Proceedings of the Topical Workshop on Forward Production of High-Mass Flavours Ii at Collider Energies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the Topical Workshop on Forward Production of High-Mass Flavours Ii at Collider Energies L.RC.8013 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TOPICAL WORKSHOP ON FORWARD PRODUCTION OF HIGH-MASS FLAVOURS II AT COLLIDER ENERGIES HELD IN PARIS COLLEGE DE FRANCE November 28-30 1979 'J3° iCfcr9. QyM*Sl)k\f / H Edited by G. Fontaine Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire College de Frinct 11. PUce Marcelin Bcrthclot . F75S31 PARIS Cedex 05 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TOPICAL WORKSHOP ON FORWARD PRODUCTION OF HIGH-MASS FLAVOURS AT COLLIDER ENERGIES HELD IN PARIS COLLEGE DE FRANCE November 28-30 1979 I S 1 M G C 0 M H 1 T E E : FONTAINE, M. 'ROISSART, C. GHESQUIERE, J. PRENTKI, G. INTRODUCTION. Tin.- present volume contains the proceed! n^s of the "Topical Workshop on forward production of hifih-rr.ass flavours at collider energies" held in Paris, ('...lene do France, November JS-10, 1979. The aim of this workshop was to discuss all the aspects (both experimental and theoretical) of this new domain of Physics recently opened up by the obser­ vation ni" a penetrating component i n cosmic-ray i nternr i ions and of charmed ::I-S.MIS and baryons in the forward d i reel ion a I l he I.S.I;.. These rel" 1 exi uns weiv further motivated by the preparation of new ;>p colliding facilities of II'.IH b higher energy and where experiments conii :m soon could prof i t ably cover | this field of interest. This workshop gathered about 90 participants from 11 countries and gave them the opportunity to exchange information and opinions in a rather informal a trios pi: ere. It is a p ieasure to thank warxl y all of them for thei r cone ri but ion to Lhe success of this meeting, and specially the speakers and those who pré­ parée1 the workshop in specialised working groups. A particular mention has to be made of Dr. M.K. GALI.I.AK1) and R. PETRONE 10 who have led a fruitful round taille discussion on theoretical aspects, which unfortunately could not be reported i n these proceed i nus. All papers included in the present publicat inn have been reproduced as rhey were prepared by the authors. They are divided into three subjects : - experimental results - Theoretical aspects - New experiments. The orjvï:iÎ5ins commî(Coe also wishes to acknowledge the precious help ^i all those who have directly or indirectly contributed to the preparation of cne workshop and of these proceedings : M. KELLER, (C.E.R.N.); M.S. DETOEUF and M.F. CHICANNE, (I.N2.P3.), C. BREON, E. BROCHET, G. MASSEl, Y. RUELLE, Y. GIRAUU-HERAUD, T). KRYN, G. ARBOUSSE-BASTIDE, X. LE TAN and J. ORILLON, (Collège de France). G. FONTAINE 1 A/ KXl'KKIMKNÏAL RKSl'LTS. Forward Production ol low m.iss flavours at Liu- C.K.R.N. I.S.R. V. Ci: I ST Kxper iment.i I ri'V i ew of charm hadroproduct ion y. Mn.i.HK Comments mi 1 prnilucl i nn at the T . S.R. B5 Kq K. SOSNOU'SKI St rue Lure of I1 rnL on-Pro tun sions with a c harried hadron pr.uîureti. A. iHAMANT-Br.RCKK Study of the forward production of ti i^h-mnss .systems .-H the I.S.R. 99 ^1 I>. CLINK High energy particLe interactions from 10-1000 TiiV"': Cosmic ray data and Proton- (Awtrff Proton col l.ûJ-c'rs". 109 V . ML'RAKI Cosni c my s and new ace el crator experiments. l2tJ qa i!/ THKORI-TICAI. ASPECTS. II. FRITZSCH B particles. i43 q^, C. PKTKKSON TheDrelica] Predictions for hifih-mass flavour production in Hadron-Hadron collisions. 155 q 4 P. KKSSLLCR YY versus Drell Yan effect in pp or pp •storage rin^s. 187 4 ST (7 NEW EXPERIMENTS. in pp interactions at 540 GeV .n energy 195 <j€ W.G. SCOTT Particle identification using dE/dx 209 ^ F. C'.ERADINI fl flavour production in the forward aria of the UA1 experiment. 229 Cff Muon detection and background from normal events for a possible forward muon detector. 257 <3>^> C. GHESQUIERE Study of a muon forward trigger in UAI experiment. 280 | &0 C. KUBBIA Instrumentation developments and potential impact on collider detectors. 297 |0| pp collider at Fermi]ab. 3°9 | Oil LIST OF PARTICIPANTS. ( rOKU'ASD PRODUCTION OF LOW MASS FLAVOURS AT THE CKRN/ISR J.C. Sens 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this cent ri but ion is three* fa Id : 1) To .show that in a subset of al l-hadro:iic processes, i.e. the ones in wiii ch a large fraction ol Lhe incident energy is transferred to one single secundary the dominant mechanism may hi- ^lunn exchange. 2) To show that gluon exchange provides a natural explanation for the [acL that baryons (n, :'i, .'. ) rosp. mesons (-, K) are produced with distributions in momentum which decrease slowly, rcsp. rapidly with increasing momentum. 3) To provide a recipe for calculating the distribution in x and p of t\ and \, states which D the SPS pp collider. The data on which the conclusions are based have been obtained witli single and double arm spectrometers placed at very small angle with res­ pect to the primary beams at the CERN/ISR. Fig. I shows the old, con­ servatively designed spectrometer dating back to 1970 of exp. R201 ; Fig. 2 shows the stream lined spectrometer operational since 1978 of R607. Typical solid angles are 10 - 10 sr, typical, momentum resolution -£ *= 0.5 - 1 % at 25 - 30 GeV. A typical particle spectrum obtained in 2 minutes ISR time is shown in fig. 3, positives on the ri^ht, negatives on the left. The main features are apparent at once: A rapidly falling specirum of negatives, essentially n , and, at the positive side, an InviLed talk at the workshop on the production of high mass flavours, Paris, November I960. Present address: S1.AC, P.O. Box 4349, Stanford CA 94305 U.S.A. assymetric peak, corresponding to ;lastically and quasi-elastically scattered protons, and at lower momenta a spectrum which is (after subtracting the IT spectrum {=* s pec" rum) from it) flat and consists mostly of protons. Fig. 4, 5 show samples of production spectra obtained with 2. 7T /TT = 2 -* 5 for x = 0.5 - 0.9 3. K+/K~ > 50 for x ? 0.7 U. o(K ) > affr ) for x > 0.7: crossover 5. Perfect scaling (fig. 5) II. GLOBAL COMPARISON pp - MESON/ep -<• eX Assuming a fast v to consist of a valence u quark from the proton, coupled to a slow d quark from the sea we may expect, in first instance, the following relations between the x dependence of the inclusive cross section for ^ , K , " production and the momentum distribution u(x) and d(x): <-.T(/Tr,;t) * T(/C>) xufx.) Vie can then relate the production of fast pions to deep-inelastic lep- ton scattering by noting that for high x, to a good approximation: x ' ? ' '/ Corcp;it i us t ïic (J(.N) ;ind d f .\) from deep-i ne List i c data we obtain l lu1 ivsiil Ls of £ i gs. 6, 7, 8, whuru the 1 ir.es are the computed u(x) and d(>:}, aparC frofl îr.e p-dependent normal iz.it ion constant per particle tvpe. The agreement is good up to x * 0.7( for x • 0.7 there are large tU-vi at ions, as ill us traced also in fig. 9 where various rat j ns are cotn- p.uvd i.i th the computed ration of the quark di st r i butions. V.'c shal 1 sec in-1 ow that these discrepancies can be complete ly removed in a more de~ t.ii l^-c rcodei . III. COL'NTK.'G RULES, OLD AN'D NI-;',; Counting rules are based on :;-ie notion of equiparriLion of energy giver. of f ts tiif proLon by the ether protsr. in the ac:_ of an ini e race ion producing a final state particle. We can classify this process by noting that in an interaction we have an exchange and that we have a number of spectators, who, as spectators do, share in the exci teraent while watching the parade. We have 3 types of exchange: exchange of gluons (g) , valence quarks (qt ) or ^ea quarks (c . ). And there arc two ways of sharing the energy: 1) it gets shared among al1 (valence and sea) quarks standing by while the produced particle leaves the proton (/The Brodsky-Gunion Counting rule") or 2) it gets shared among the valence quarks only ("The valence counting rule"). There is of course the third possib) '. : *-y of sharing among sea quarks only but sea quarks are known (from pp -* -,. ->voerinencs e.g.) to have very small average momenta and steeply falling sea distributions, so chey do not enter into this picture of high x mesonproduction. So with 3 exchanges and 2 ways oî counting the spectators we have 6 possible cases. How do we know whicii is which? The ans'-'er is we don't for sure buL we can try and make the plausible ;is.-un'.pLi'on that the Larger the number of spectators .\' the lower the energy K'f!: for the - will be on average. Thus the rnonenturr: spectrin of titu ~ ::IUSL decrease faster with increasing x, the larger the nuT.bri: ,\". Brod.sky .znd Cimion liave shown from field theory arguments that for N spectators the dependence on x is given by (/-*-)" * = *#-/ & For example tiie inclusive production of ~ mesons of high x and srcalî _ ) ) - n = 2 n=2 n = 1 v v v n = ] n = 0 n » I s s s n=3 n=2 n =2 where n , n is the number of valence and sea spectators and n = n + n • V S ^ V S From eq.
Recommended publications
  • DPF NEWSLETTER - July 1, 1994
    DPF NEWSLETTER - July 1, 1994 To: Members of the Division of Particles and Fields From: Robert N. Cahn, Secretary-Treasurer, [email protected] HEPAP Subpanel Reports The HEPAP Subpanel on Vision for the Future of High-Energy Physics has issued its report, which was endorsed by HEPAP itself. The Conclusions and Recommendations are given below: Conclusion 1 We have inherited a great tradition of scientific inquiry. The field of particle physics has made dramatic progress in understanding the fundamental structure of matter. Recent discoveries and technological advances enable us to address such compelling scientific issues as the origin of mass, the underlying cause of the preponderance of matter over antimatter, and the nature of the invisible matter that accounts for up to 90% of the mass of the universe. Recommendation 1 As befitting a great nation with a rich and successful history of leadership in science and technology, the United States should continue to be among the leaders in the worldwide pursuit of the answers to fundamental questions of particle physics. Conclusion 2 To sustain excellence in the U.S. high-energy physics program for two decades and beyond, three elements are essential. a flexible, diverse, and dynamic ongoing research effort to address scientifically compelling questions. This implies strong support for university groups, effective use and timely upgrades of domestic accelerators, and an active program of nonaccelerator-based inquiries. vigorous studies to develop and master the technologies for future accelerators and detectors, and significant participation at the highest energy frontier, for which the best current opportunity beyond the Tevatron is through international collaboration on the LHC at CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Department of Physics & Astronomy Phone
    Dr. Darrel W. Smith Curriculum Vitae Email: [email protected] Department of Physics & Astronomy Phone: 928.777.6663 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Fax: 928.777.3827 3700 Willow Creek Rd. Prescott, AZ 86301 Education 1975–1979 Ph.D, Physics (specialization in high-energy physics) UC Irvine (Dissertation: “Antiproton-deuteron production of L’s below 1 GeV/c” PI—Jonas Schultz 1972–1975 M.A. Physics UC Irvine 1970–1972 B.A. Physics UC Irvine Employment: 2018—present Professor of Physics, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 1996–2017 Professor of Physics, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (tenured) Department Chair, Department of Physics & Astronomy 1990–1996 Associate Professor Physics, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 1985–1990 Associate Research Physicist, UC Riverside 1982–1985 Visiting Scientist, CERN and Assistant Research Physicist, UC Riverside 1979–1982 Post-Doc, UC Irvine Research Activities 2018—present Search for Sterile Neutrinos using the Coherent Captain Mills (CCM) detector at Los Alamos National Lab. 2009–2018 UG cosmic ray research lab at ERAU. Investigating how cosmic ray muons interact with the hydrogen and carbon nuclei. 2007–Present Exotic Propulsion for future space missions (e.g., manned mission to Mars) 2000–2013 MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab, search for massive neutrinos 1990–1999 LSND (Large Scintillator Neutrino Detector) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, search for massive neutrinos (dark matter) 1985–1990 DZero experiment at Fermilab, construction of the silicon vertex detector for discovering the top quark. PI—Anne Kernan 1982–1985 UA1 experiment at CERN, discovery of the W± and Zo particle, first evidence for the unification of electromagnetic and weak interactions. PI—Carlo Rubbia and Anne Kernan 1979–1982 IMB proton decay, search for proton decay, and neutrino astrophysics PI—Fred Reines 1975–1979 Lambda production in antiproton-deuteron collisions.
    [Show full text]
  • May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50Th Anniverarsary Physics Department Had 21 Faculty by 1973‐ 74
    UCR Physics: The Early Years (1953-1973) May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary Physics Department had 21 faculty by 1973‐ 74 May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary Ground was broken on July 30, Campus Construction 1952. Five new buildings were constructed: Library, Weber Hall (life sciences), Physical Education (pool & gym), Physical Science (now Geology) and Social Science & Humanities. Of course, the “Barn” was remodeled in 1959 and served Citrus Experiment Station 1916 as the campus cafeteria. May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary 1954‐59 1959‐61 Div. Physical Science (B.S. 1970 College of Physical College of Letters & Science in Physics, Ph.D. 1961) Sciences B.A. in Physical Science Div. Life Offered, Science Div. Social 1969 College of Biological Science & Agricultural Science Div. 1970 College Social & Humanities Behavioral Science Citrus Experiment 1960 1970 College of Station Graduate Division— Humanities College of Agriculture (Ph.D.) M.A. in Physics Graduate Division May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary The present Physics Building was completed in 1965, with 53,000 asf. In addition, the Magnet Lab was completed with NSF matching funds. Physical Science #3 (after Geology and Pierce) May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary 1956 UCR Highlander Football Team: 1‐4‐1 Record. Lost 40‐0 to Redlands Univ. Constructing and painting the Big “C” Edward Teller came to UCR for UC Charter Day (92nd Birthday) in 1960 Physical Science Faculty (1961) (Can you spot Bob Wild and D. C. McCollum? May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary Physics 2000 Lecture Demonstrations May 28, 2011 UCR Physics 50th Anniverarsary Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • DPF NEWSLETTER - November 15, 1995
    DPF NEWSLETTER - November 15, 1995 To: Members of the Division of Particles and Fields From: Jonathan Bagger, Secretary-Treasurer, [email protected] DPF Elections A ballot for the DPF elections is enclosed with this newsletter. This year we will elect a Vice-Chair, a Division Councillor, and two regular members of the Executive Committee. The current members of the DPF Executive Committee and the final years of their terms are Chair: David Cassel (1995) Chair-Elect: Frank Sciulli (1995) Vice-Chair: Paul Grannis (1995) Past Chair: Michael Zeller (1995) Secretary-Treasurer: Jonathan Bagger (1997) Division Councillor: Anne Kernan (1995), Henry Frisch (1997) Executive Board: Sally Dawson (1996), Martin Einhorn (1997), Vera Luth (1995), John Rutherfoord (1997), Michael Shaevitz (1996), Bruce Winstein (1995) The nominees for Vice-Chair are Howard Georgi (Harvard) and Bill Willis (Columbia). Drew Baden (Maryland) and George Trilling (U.C. Berkeley) are the candidates for Division Councillor. The nominees for regular members of the Executive Committee are Dan Amidei (Michigan), Thomas Devlin (Rutgers), John Gunion (U.C. Davis), William Molzon (U.C. Irvine), Harry Nelson (U.C. Santa Barbara) and Heidi Schellman (Northwestern). The statements from the candidates are appended at the end of the newsletter. The deadline for receipt of completed ballots is December 31, 1995. Snowmass 1996: New Directions for High Energy Physics This summer there will be a Snowmass workshop in Snowmass, Colorado, from June 24 to July 12, 1996. Arrival, registration, and a reception are planned for June 24. Full-day plenary sessions will be held on June 25 & 26 and July 11 & 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Pions to Quarks
    NEWS from the Summer Conferences will appear in our next issue. data last year, the noise seems to discussed evidence for the exist• The Symposium, which was un• be abating.) ence of the top quark based on der the auspices of Tel Aviv Uni• New preliminary results coming UA1 data. The quoted mass limits, versity, was ably organized by from the UA5 detector at the between 30 and 50 GeV, were de• Jacob Grunhaus, and all the par• CERN Collider caused a great stir. termined from semileptonic de• ticipants owe him a vote of thanks. The data was taken while operat• cays of W bosons. From Errol Gotsman ing the Collider in a pulsed mode John Ellis held the attention of at a record collision energy of 900 the audience with his talk on 'Su- GeV (see May issue, page 131). persymmetry and anything be• Pions to quarks John Rushbrooke made a beautiful yond the Standard Model in This was the title of an interna• presentation of the data, stressing hadron interactions,' however in tional symposium on particle the new features that are seen. the light of the new UA1 and UA2 physics in the 1950s, held at Fer- These include the fast increase of data presented by Peter Watkins milab from 1-4 May and which at• the average number of charged and Michele Livan, this lecture tracted 170 participants from ten particles with energy, and viola• took on a speculative tone. countries, as well as other visitors tion of so-called 'KNO' scaling Arnon Dar gave a fascinating from Fermilab and the surround• over the collision energy range survey of Cosmic Accelerators, a ing area.
    [Show full text]