DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Products Hydrogen Pipeline Project City of Carson Project Case CUP 1089-18 State Clearinghouse No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Products Hydrogen Pipeline Project City of Carson Project Case CUP 1089-18 State Clearinghouse No Draft Environmental Impact Report Air Products Hydrogen Pipeline Project City of Carson Project Case CUP 1089-18 State Clearinghouse No. SCH 2020059038 September 2020 Prepared by: City of Carson Community Development 701 East Carson Street Carson, CA 90745 Prepared with the assistance of: MRS Environmental, Inc. 1306 Santa Barbara Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 This Page Left Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. ES-3 ES.2 Description of Proposed Project ............................................................................... ES-3 ES.3 Objectives of the Proposed Project .......................................................................... ES-4 ES.4 Description of Alternatives ...................................................................................... ES-5 ES.4.1 No Project Alternative ........................................................................................ ES-5 ES.4.2 New Pipeline Alternative .................................................................................... ES-5 ES.4.3 Pipeline Modifications Alternative ..................................................................... ES-6 ES.4.4 Truck Transport from the Air Products Carson Facility Alternative .................. ES-7 ES.4.5 Hydrogen Generation Unit Alternative ............................................................... ES-7 ES.5 Current Operations ................................................................................................... ES-8 ES.6 Impacts of Proposed Project, Alternatives, and Cumulative Development ............. ES-8 ES.6.1 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project ................................................... ES-9 ES.6.2 Impacts Associated with the Alternatives ......................................................... ES-12 ES.6.3 Impacts Associated with the Cumulative Development ................................... ES-17 ES.7 Environmentally Superior Alternative ................................................................... ES-19 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Overview of Proposed Project ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 The Environmental Impact Report Process ................................................................. 1-4 1.2.1 Purpose and Intended Uses of the Environmental Impact Report ......................... 1-4 1.2.2 Agency Use of the EIR .......................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.3 Notice of Preparation and Initial Study ................................................................. 1-5 1.3 EIR Contents and Guide to the Reader ....................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 EIR Contents .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.2 Thresholds of Significance .................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 EIR Preparation and Certification Process ............................................................ 1-7 2.0 Proposed Project Description and Alternatives .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Project Location .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Background and Historic Operations ........................................................................ 2-14 2.4 Current Operations .................................................................................................... 2-14 2.5 Project Objectives ...................................................................................................... 2-14 2.6 Existing Pipeline ........................................................................................................ 2-15 2.7 New Pipeline Construction ........................................................................................ 2-16 Construction Personnel ........................................................................................ 2-16 Equipment and Staging Areas .............................................................................. 2-16 Construction Methods .......................................................................................... 2-17 Testing and Inspection ......................................................................................... 2-19 Access and Traffic Management ......................................................................... 2-20 Other Protection Measures ................................................................................... 2-20 2.8 Receiving Facilities ................................................................................................... 2-20 2.9 Pipeline Safety Measures .......................................................................................... 2-21 AIR PRODUCTS HYDROGEN PIPELINE PROJECT i PUBLIC DRAFT EIR SEPTEMBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 2-21 Leak Detection ..................................................................................................... 2-21 Cathodic Protection .............................................................................................. 2-21 Visual Inspections ................................................................................................ 2-22 One Call System .................................................................................................. 2-22 Pipeline Markings ................................................................................................ 2-22 2.10 Pipeline Operations ................................................................................................... 2-22 Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System ............................................. 2-23 Emergency Response ........................................................................................... 2-23 Emergency Flare .................................................................................................. 2-23 2.11 Applicant Proposed Avoidance and Minimization Measures ................................... 2-24 2.12 Regulatory Oversight ................................................................................................ 2-26 2.13 References ................................................................................................................. 2-27 3.0 Cumulative Scenario ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Cumulative Methodology ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Cumulative Projects .................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 References ................................................................................................................... 3-9 4.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 4.1-1 4.1.1 Environmental Setting .......................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.1.1.1 Meteorological Conditions............................................................................ 4.1-1 4.1.1.2 Temperature and Rainfall ............................................................................. 4.1-2 4.1.1.3 Wind Flow Patterns....................................................................................... 4.1-2 4.1.1.4 Air Quality Monitoring ................................................................................. 4.1-5 4.1.2 Baseline Operational Emissions ........................................................................... 4.1-7 4.1.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................ 4.1-8 4.1.3.1 Federal Authority .......................................................................................... 4.1-8 4.1.3.2 State Authority .............................................................................................. 4.1-8 4.1.3.3 Local Authority SCAQMD ........................................................................... 4.1-8 4.1.4 Significance Thresholds ........................................................................................ 4.1-9 4.1.5 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures........................................................... 4.1-10 4.1.5.1 Construction Emissions .............................................................................. 4.1-10 4.1.5.2 Operational Emissions ................................................................................ 4.1-14 4.1.6 Impact Discussion ............................................................................................... 4.1-16 4.1.7 Cumulative Effects.............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mar-Apr (1093 MB
    OMNILORE NEWS March 2012 1 Volume 21 Issue 2 www.omnilore.org March 2012 OLLI AT CSUDH “Libraries of the Future” at the Spring Forum OMNILORE by Carol Kerster mniloreans are fortunate! We have heard a OMNILORE NEWS is a publication of variety of experts entertain, enlighten, and/or OMNILORE, a Learning-in-Retirement educate us at our quarterly Forum meetings. Organization, a program of the Osher Life- O While most of our speakers have followed a direct long Learning Institute at the California State University Dominguez Hills course from their education and experience to their current occupations, this is not the case for the BOARD OF DIRECTORS speaker at our next Forum on April 30: Katherine R. Gould, director of the Palos Verdes Library District, Elected Officers whose eclectic background enhances her qualifica- President Bill Gargaro tions to share her ideas about how our traditionally paper-based library systems are transitioning into VP - Academics Jade Suzanne Neely Katherine Gould VP - Administration Howard Korman the digital world. Treasurer Jim Slattery Armed with a magna cum laude B.A. from Brandon University in Manitoba, Recording Secretary RosaLee Saikley Canada, and an M.S. in Library and Information Management from USC, Past President Ruth Hart Ms. Gould has traveled huge distances, both professionally and geograph- Member-at-Large Don Johnson ically. She started out as a reference librarian in Pasadena, then in 1989 Member-at-Large Mary Louise Mavian moved to Queensland, Australia, to lead a multi-disciplinary team on a $20 million project to redesign and implement business processes, the first of Member-at-Large Jill McKenzie three positions she held on that continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan
    Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan April 2005 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee Ann Dalkey and Travis Longcore, Co-Chairs Editor’s Note This document includes text prepared by several authors. Julie Stephenson and Dr. Antony Orme completed research and text on geomorphology (Appendix A). Dr. Ronald Davidson researched and reported South Bay history (Appendix B). Sarah Casia and Leann Ortmann completed biological fieldwork, supervised by Dr. Rudi Mattoni. All photographs © Travis Longcore. GreenInfo Network prepared maps under the direction of Aubrey Dugger (http://www.greeninfo.org). You may download a copy of this plan from: http://www.urbanwildlands.org/bbrp.html This plan was prepared with funding from California Proposition 12, administered by the California Coastal Conservancy and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission through a grant to the Los Angeles Conservation Corps and The Urban Wildlands Group. Significant additional funding was provided by a grant from the City of Redondo Beach. Preferred Citation Longcore, T. (ed.). 2005. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee, Redondo Beach, California. 2 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction .........................................................................................................................5 Goals.....................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection, 1902-2004
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3s20214f No online items RANCHO SAN PEDRO REFERENCE COLLECTION, 1902-2004 Finding aid prepared by Jennifer Allan Goldman California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ ©2006 RANCHO SAN PEDRO REFERENCE Consult repository. 1 COLLECTION, 1902-2004 Descriptive Summary Title: Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection Dates: 1905-2004 Collection Number: Consult repository. Collector: California State University, Dominguez Hills Extent: 2 boxes(1 linear foot) Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ Abstract: This collection includes correspondence, brochures, newsclippings, papers, and copies of historical documents related to the Rancho San Pedro. Subjects include the Dominguez Adobe and Claretian Seminary, families descended from the Dominguez sisters, companies owned by these descendants, and the history of the Rancho San Pedro. Language: Collection material is in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical materials and not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. Preferred Citation [Title of item], Rancho San Pedro Reference Collection, Courtesy of the Department of Archives and Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • White Point Nature Preserve Master Plan
    Master Plan for the White Point Nature Preserve Page 1 Master Plan for the White Point Nature Preserve Prepared for the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy in cooperation with the OS VER L D White Point Nature Preserve Steering A E P S Land Committee Conservancy P E A N L I N S U August 27, 2001 Master Plan for the White Point Nature Preserve Page 2 White Point Nature Preserve Steering Committee Community Members Veralee Bassler Bruce Biesman-Simons R. Travis Brooks George Gonzalez Robert Grantham Leah Marinkovich Danna McDonough Rodger Paige Noel Park Beth Sohngen June Burlingame-Smith Larry Vivian Members in Official Capacity – Non-Voting Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy William Ailor, President Keith Lenard, Executive Director Loren DeRoy, Project Manager/ Steering Committee Chairman Stephan Heyn, Stewardship Director John Nieto, Education Programs Manager Angelika Brinkmann-Busi, Land Management Consultant City of Los Angeles Eric Moody, Deputy Councilman to Rudy Svorinich, Councilman, 15th District Gat Lum, Acting Superintendent for the Pacific Region, Dept. of Rec. & Parks Maile Marquand, Superintendent of Recreation, Dept. of Rec. & Parks David Wood, Sr. Park Maintenance Supervisor, Dept. Of Rec. & Parks Julian Jimenez, Park Maintenance Supervisor, Dept. of Rec. & Parks Los Angeles Air Force Base John Ryan, Public Affairs Officer, Los Angeles Air Force Base Master Plan for the White Point Nature Preserve Page 3 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. Gillingham Working Papers, 1932-1983
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt367nc7q2 No online items ROBERT C. GILLINGHAM WORKING PAPERS, 1932-1983 Finding aid prepared by Jennifer Allan Goldman California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ ©2006 ROBERT C. GILLINGHAM WORKING Consult repository. 1 PAPERS, 1932-1983 Descriptive Summary Title: Robert C. Gillingham Working Papers Dates: 1932-1983 Collection Number: Consult repository. Creator: Gillingham, Robert C. (Robert Cameron), 1896- Extent: 1 linear foot (2 boxes) Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://archives.csudh.edu/ Abstract: Robert C. Gillingham was a historian who focused on the South Bay, specifically the Rancho San Pedro, the Dominguez family, and Compton. This collection consists of correspondence, drafts, and manuscript copies related to his work on The Rancho San Pedro and Yesterdays of Compton. Language: Collection material is in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical materials and not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. Preferred Citation [Title of item], Robert C. Gillingham Working Papers, Courtesy of the Department of Archives and Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey Report
    F.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE SAN PEDRO WATERFRONT PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Los Angeles Harbor Department Environmental Management Division 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, California 90733 Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90017 213/627-5376 August 2008 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2 II. REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................ 3 FEDERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 3 STATE REGULATIONS ...................................................................................... 4 LOCAL REGULATIONS ..................................................................................... 6 III. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 7 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 7 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SETTING .............................................................. 7 ETHNOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 9 HISTORIC BACKGROUND .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, and the Colonial Roots of California, 1846 – 1879
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879 Camille Alexandrite Suárez University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Suárez, Camille Alexandrite, "How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3491. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3491 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3491 For more information, please contact [email protected]. How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879 Abstract The construction of California as an American state was a colonial project premised upon Indigenous removal, state-supported land dispossession, the perpetuation of unfree labor systems and legal, race- based discrimination alongside successful Anglo-American settlement. This dissertation, entitled “How the West was Won: Race, Citizenship, and the Colonial Roots of California, 1849 - 1879” argues that the incorporation of California and its diverse peoples into the U.S. depended on processes of colonization that produced and justified an adaptable acialr hierarchy that protected white privilege and supported a racially-exclusive conception of citizenship. In the first section, I trace how the California Constitution and federal and state legislation violated the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This legal system empowered Anglo-American migrants seeking territorial, political, and economic control of the region by allowing for the dispossession of Californio and Indigenous communities and legal discrimination against Californio, Indigenous, Black, and Chinese persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HIST Dominguez Ranch Adobe AND/OR COMMON Rancho San Pedro/Dominguez Ranch Homesite LOCATION STREET& NUMBER 18127 South Alameda Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Compton VICINITY OF 32nd Congressional District STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 37 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE X.MUSEUM ^PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK STRUCTURE —BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS OBJECT _IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY _OTHER: NAME The Congregation of Missionary Sons of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Western Province / Claretian Fathftrs____________,______ STREET & NUMBER ___18127 South Alameda Street___________________.____________ CITY. TOWN VICINITY OF I LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Los Angeles County Courthouse STREET& NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY, TOWN STATE Los Angeles California____90012 I REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE April 25, lQij5 -FEDERAL X-STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Department of Parks & Recreation CITY. TOWN STATE Sacramento California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE ^.EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED __UNALTERED .X.ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD —RUINS ^ALTERED _MOVED DATE_ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED The original 1830 structure was a one-story, L-shaped adobe in the early California ranchhouse style, containing six large rooms. It measured over 80 feet from north to south and more than 70 feet west, comprising a total area of over 3,000 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • RANCHO SAN PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, Bulk 1900-1960
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt109nc51t No online items INVENTORY OF THE RANCHO SAN PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, bulk 1900-1960 Finding aid prepared by Thomas Philo. California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html ©2006 INVENTORY OF THE RANCHO SAN Consult repository. 1 PEDRO COLLECTION, 1769-1972, bulk 1900-1960 Descriptive Summary Title: Rancho San Pedro Collection Dates: 1769-1972 Bulk: 1900-1960 Collection Number: Consult repository. Collector: California State University, Dominguez Hills Extent: 301 boxes, [155 linear ft.] Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room G-145 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html Abstract: This collection contains legal and business papers related to the Rancho San Pedro and to its owners, the Dominguez family. The Spanish crown gave the Southern California lands of the Rancho San Pedro to Juan Jose Dominguez in 1784, and in 1858 the United States government granted a patent confirming Dominguez family ownership of the Rancho. A few items predate the 1858 patent, but the bulk of the collection is from 1880-1960. Some materials concern the Rancho San Pedro itself, including partitions of land among family members, farming, oil and water development, and legal issues with neighboring cities, including Los Angeles and Long Beach. Much of the collection comprises records of the business, water, and real estate companies established by Dominguez heirs in and around the Los Angeles area.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth and Reality in the Redondo Beach Public Library, 1895-1924
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2013 Made Marian: Myth and Reality in the Redondo Beach Public Library, 1895-1924 Lisa Blank San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Blank, Lisa, "Made Marian: Myth and Reality in the Redondo Beach Public Library, 1895-1924" (2013). Master's Theses. 4261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.pzph-m24n https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4261 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MADE MARIAN: MYTH AND REALITY IN THE REDONDO BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY, 1895-1924 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Library and Information Science San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Library and Information Science by Lisa Blank May 2013 © 2013 Lisa Blank ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled MADE MARIAN: MYTH AND REALITY IN THE REDONDO BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY, 1895-1924 by Lisa Blank APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY May 2013 Dr. Debra Hansen School of Library and Information Science Dr. Judith Weedman School of Library and Information Science Dr. Anthony Bernier School of Library and Information Science ABSTRACT MADE MARIAN: MYTH AND REALITY IN THE REDONDO BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY, 1895-1924 by Lisa Blank Librarians have been depicted in the literature as missionaries, apostles, and crusaders, militant maid Marians spreading the gospel of the library spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5 Cultural Resources
    3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.5.1 Introduction This section analyzes the Program’s potential impacts on architectural, archeological, and paleolontogical resources, and human remains. The Environmental Setting (Section 3.5.2) provides an overview of the history of the Los Angeles area and the LAUSD. The applicable regulations section (Section 3.5.3) identifies federal, State and local laws, policies, and regulations relating to cultural and historical resources. The Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures section (Section 3.5.4) examines Program impacts and identifies feasible mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. 3.5.2 Environmental Setting Historical Context of the Los Angeles Area. The Los Angeles area has a rich and varied prehistoric past as well as a history that dates back to the 1700s. Prehistorically, the ancestors of the Gabrielino-Tongva occupied the entire Los Angeles Basin and practiced a hunters and gatherers form of survival. Small encampments to large village sites have been identified throughout the area, some dating back over 5,000 years. Historically, the occupation of Los Angeles County by non-natives began with the colonization of California, the expedition in 1769 to build a series of missions along the coast, and in 1781 when a group of 44 settlers founded the town of Our Lady the Queen of the Angel (El Pueblo de Nuestra Senor la Reina de Los Angeles de Prociuncula). This rich history has resulted in many significant archaeological and built environment resources within the Los Angeles area. Table 3.5-1 provides a chronology of key events in history for the greater Los Angeles basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Cultural Resources Comprise Archaeological and Historical Resources
    SOLANA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT EIR CITY OF TORRANCE 5. Environmental Analysis 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Cultural resources comprise archaeological and historical resources. Archaeological resources are prehistoric or historic evidence of past human activities, including structural ruins and buried resources. Historical resources include sites, structures, objects, or places that are at least 50 years old and are significant for their engineering, architecture, cultural use or association, etc. In California, historic resources cover human activities over the past 12,000 years. Cultural resources provide information on scientific progress, environmental adaptations, group ideology, or other human advancements. Native American tribal cultural resources are addressed in Section 5.13, Tribal Cultural Resources, of this DEIR. Paleontological resources are addressed in Section 5.5, Geology and Soils, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Update approved in December 2018. This section of the DEIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the Project to impact cultural resources in the City of Torrance. The analysis in this section is based in part on the following information: . Cultural Records Investigation Report, Solana Residential Development, within the City of Torrance, Los Angeles County, California, Paleo Solutions, Inc., November 12, 2018. A complete copy of the Cultural Records Investigation Report is in the technical appendices of this DEIR (Appendix D). 5.4.1 Environmental Setting 5.4.1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND Federal and State Regulations National Historic Preservation Act The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) coordinates public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect the nation’s historic and archaeological resources. The act authorized the National Register of Historic Places, which lists districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture.
    [Show full text]