2020 Annual Report Dear NARAL Massachusetts Community
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ronald Reagan, SDI, and the Nuclear Freeze: Reordering the Ethics of Mass Destruction
Ronald Reagan, SDI, and the Nuclear Freeze: Reordering the Ethics of Mass Destruction A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of History Jacqueline Jones, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Joseph Brown July 2008 Copyright by Joseph Brown July 2008 ABSTRACT Ronald Reagan, SDI, and the Nuclear Freeze: Reordering the Ethics of Mass Destruction A master’s thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts by Joseph Brown By proposing the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), Ronald Reagan co-opted the rhetoric of the nuclear freeze movement and reversed the relationship that had previously existed between himself and his anti-nuclear opponents. Prior to Reagan’s announcement of SDI, the nuclear freeze movement played the role of the ethically principled critic, denouncing Reagan for perpetuating the nuclear arms race and the policy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). By adopting a proposal for space-based missile defenses, Reagan took on the role of the peace-loving nuclear critic. The Strategic Defense Initiative eclipsed the ethical appeals of the nuclear freeze movement, promising the eventual abolition of nuclear weapons. Ironically, the nuclear freeze movement found itself promoting MAD, because its own proposal to halt the arms race would do nothing to change the dynamic of offensive nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Soviet Union. Although Reagan openly advocated the expansion of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, he was able to justify his strategic modernization plan as a temporary measure, necessary to preserve America’s security until his missile shield could be put in place. -
Appendix 1, Greg Howard, July 12, 2018 Pitching Interview
Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 03/11/2019 1:49:33 PM Appendix 1, Greg Howard, July 12, 2018 Pitching interview opportunities for Houston Consul General [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 03/11/2019 1:49:33 PM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 03/11/2019 1:49:33 PM Appendix 2, Ekaterina Myagkova, June 7, 2018: Mercury emailed a media advisory for an Iftar dinner co-hosted by the Turkish Consulate General in Miami to the following addresses on June 7 and June 8, 2018: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 03/11/2019 -
An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families
________________________________________________________________________________________________ Everyone Needs ID: An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 Sponsored by Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Lead Sponsors: Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Senate Cosponsors: Senators Will Brownsberger, Jo Comerford, Julian Cyr, Sal DiDomenico, Jamie Eldridge, Cindy Friedman, Pat Jehlen, Jason Lewis, Mike Moore, and Becca Rausch House Cosponsors: Representatives Ruth Balser, Natalie Blais, Daniel Carey, Mike Connolly, Dan Donahue, Marjorie Decker, Mindy Domb, Carolyn Dykema, Nika Elugardo, Tricia Farley-Bouvier, Sean Garballey, Carmine Gentile, Carlos González, Tami Gouveia, James Hawkins, Kevin Honan, Mary Keefe, David LeBoeuf, Jack Patrick Lewis, David Linsky, Adrian Madaro, Liz Malia, Paul Mark, Paul McMurtry, Liz Miranda, Jim O’Day, Elizabeth Poirier, Denise Provost, Dave Rogers, Lindsay Sabadosa, Jon Santiago, Tom Stanley, José Tosado, Steve Ultino, Aaron Vega, and Bud Williams Bill History: Both Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 were refiled in January 2019, and were reported out favorably by the Joint Committee on Transportation in November 2019. S. 2043 was sent to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, and may come up for a vote by the full Senate soon. H. 3066 was sent to the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, and is awaiting action. Last session, the bill (Senate Bill 2568) passed the Senate unanimously. Importance of -
Members on NOAA-Related Congressional Committees
Membership of NOAA-Related U.S. Senate and House of Representatives Committees and Subcommittees 115th Congress: 2017-2018 The following is a list of the Members who have been officially confirmed by a vote of the Senate or House (as of February 28, 2017) to be a Member on a NOAA-related, congressional committee and subcommittee that has primary oversight over our budget, mission, programs, and activities. Additional announcements related to positions within the committees are also noted (as of February 28, 2017). When more assignments are formalized, an updated list will be distributed, or you may visit House.gov and Senate.gov. Please note that some committee assignments may not be formalized until February or March. The Members highlighted in yellow are new to the committee. The Members with the word NEW after their name are new to Congress, are former Members who have been elected again, or hold a new office in Congress, such as Members of the House who won Senate seats in the November 2016 election. Senate Committee on Appropriations *The Chair and Ranking Member are ex officio (by virtue of their position) members of all Subcommittees. S-128 Capitol Building, Washington, DC 20510 Tel: (202) 224-7257 Click here to visit this organization's website Click here to visit this organization's website (Minority) Click here to read this organization's latest press releases Committee Calendar Committee Legislation - 115th Congress Committee Legislation - 114th Congress Majority - The Majority Members were confirmed by the full Senate on January -
Massachusetts 2012 Senate Poll
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 2, 2010 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Scott Brown looking good for 2012 re-election Raleigh, N.C. – In a look ahead to 2012, PPP tested five different Democrats against freshman Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown, who surprised the world by taking Ted Kennedy’s old seat in a January 2010 special election that was a precursor to November’s midterm drubbings. But Brown is still so popular even in a wider electorate that even in this heavily blue state, none of the five can come closer than a seven-point deficit. Brown tops recently re-elected Governor Deval Patrick, 49-42; Kennedy’s widow Vicki, 48-41; 34-year representative of the 7th congressional district, Ed Markey, 49-39; 8th- district Congressman Mike Capuano, 52-36; and 9th-district Congressman Stephen Lynch, 49-30. The varying deficits are largely a function of name recognition, but there is clearly a ceiling for a Democrat right now in an unlikely place. Brown gets 22-28% of Democrats, something usually only seen in Southern Democratic states like North Carolina. He maintains 85-89% of his own party, and holds 29- to 34-point leads with independents, who make up almost as much of the electorate (38%) as Democrats (42%). In a sign of how moderate and mainstream Brown’s image is, 53% say his views are “about right,” something only 32% say of the GOP as a whole. -
MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN for State Representative • Dedicated • Independent • Devoted
Everett • State Representative Everett • State Representative Democrat JOE GETSDemocrat THEJ OEJ OBGETS THE DONE! JOB DONE! Joe State Rep. Joe McGonagleJoe securedState Rep. over Joe McGonagle $13 Millionsecured over $13in Million State in State McGonagle Funding for Everett McGonagl duringe theFunding COVID-19 for Everett during Pandemic! the COVID-19 Pandemic! Paid Political Ad Vote by Mail, Early Vote, or In-PersonPaid Political Ad Vote on by Mail,Tuesday, Early Vote, or In-PersonSeptember on Tuesday, September1st. 1st. Everett IndependentPublished by the Independent Newspaper Co. Wednesday, August 26, 2020 Football, fall sports will move to February along with GBL pact By Seth Daniel ty in the red (high-risk for COVID-19) and in Everett Imagine Everett Veterans we are in the red, you’ll be Memorial Stadium emp- moved to the floating sea- ty on a Friday night in the son, which starts on Feb. fall – no touchdowns, no 22,” Turner told the School cheerleaders, no marching Committee Monday. “We band, no hard-nosed tack- are a district that is in the les, and no journeys to a red and so we don’t have The past seven days have been a very exciting – and unusual – time to campaign and vote in Everett for the Sept. 1 State Super Bowl title at Gillette a choice. All fall sports Primary Election. Between mail-in voting, socially-distanced rallies and statewide bus tours, Everett has been a stop for all. Stadium in early December. will be moved to Feb. 22. Shown here are U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (above left) in Everett Square with State Sen. -
Letter from Legislators 7/14/20
July 14, 2020 His Excellency Governor Charles D. Baker State House, Room #280 24 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02133 The Honorable Secretary Marylou Sudders Executive Office of Health and Human Services One Ashburton Place 11th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Re: Support to Accelerate Improvements in the Local Health System Dear Governor Baker and Secretary Sudders: Thank you for your all of your work on behalf of the Commonwealth, and especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. If this pandemic has taught us anything, it is that government can take broad scale action quickly when we make it a priority. The pandemic has highlighted our Commonwealth’s many strengths, and also its weaknesses. It has shown us that government can rise to the occasion and create powerful, positive change to address those weaknesses and build for a better tomorrow. It has become exceedingly clear that our local public health system presents us with an opportunity for taking that broad scale action quickly in order to build a stronger Commonwealth for everyone. We were pleased to pass Chapter 72 of the Acts of 2020, An Act Relative to Strengthening the Local and Regional Public Health System (also known as the State Action for Public Health Excellence, or SAPHE, Act), this past April, and we are grateful that you signed this important legislation into law. In light of lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that we must now accelerate progress more quickly toward the goals of the law. During this crisis, our local boards of health have been on the front lines of our state’s response. -
Suffolk University/7NEWS Massachusetts Registered Voters Races
Suffolk University/7NEWS Massachusetts Registered Voters Suffolk/7NEWS Marginals GEOC N= 500 100% Worcester/West ................................. 1 ( 1/ 86) 120 24% NE ............................................. 2 175 35% Suffolk ........................................ 3 40 8% SE Mass/Cape ................................... 4 165 33% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for 7NEWS/Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some questions? N= 500 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/ 88) 500 100% S1 Thank You. S1. Are you currently registered to vote? N= 500 100% Yes ............................................ 1 ( 1/ 90) 500 100% NO/DK/RF ....................................... 2 0 0% GENDR Gender N= 500 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/ 89) 239 48% Female ......................................... 2 261 52% S2. Are you currently registered as a Democrat, Republican, or Unenrolled/ Independent? N= 500 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/ 93) 186 37% Republican ..................................... 2 62 12% Unenrolled/Ind ................................. 3 242 48% Other .......................................... 4 10 2% Und/Ref/Not reg ................................ 5 0 0% S3. What is your age category? N= 500 100% 18-34 Yrs ...................................... 1 ( 1/ 96) 66 13% 35-44 Yrs ...................................... 2 92 18% -
Bristol County
YOUTH JUSTICE VOTER GUIDE AND LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD: MASSACHUSETTS 2020 BRISTOL COUNTY WELCOME LETTER Each year, thousands of young people in Massachusetts come in contact with the juvenile justice system. These young people are disproportionately children of color, children from the child welfare system, children coming from areas of concentrated poverty, and LGBTQ children. For the majority of these young people, interactions with the juvenile justice system are overwhelmingly negative, and lead to poor outcomes and even increased delinquency. Progress in reforming our legal system into one that is fair and works to create positive outcomes for all system-involved youth, creating stronger and safer communities for everyone, is dependent on elected officials who support or oppose these reforms. This non-partisan voter guide is intended to ensure that you, as a voter, know your rights and are informed in our decisions. The primary focus of this voter guide is to provide the voting record of state elected officials currently in office. We also compiled information on resources from MassVOTE and the Massachusetts Chapter of the League of Women Voters regarding candidate forums in contested elections. This voter guide is intended for educational purposes. The above not-for-profit, non-partisan organizations do not endorse any candidates or political parties for public office. Table of Contents WELCOME LETTER IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION IMPORTANT ELECTION DATES SPECIAL COVID-19 ELECTION LAWS: VOTE SAFELY BY MAIL THE KEY ISSUES QUESTIONS TO ASK CANDIDATES IN CONTESTED ELECTIONS VOTING RECORD METHODOLOGY KEY TO THE SCORECARD Bristol County State Senators Bristol County State Representatives PARTNERS IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION Am I eligible to vote? You must be at least 18 years old, a US citizen on election day and registered to vote at least 10 days before the election. -
Welcome to the New England Circle/Citizens Roundtable. This Evening's Discussion, Affirmative Action and Its Impact on Society Is Led by JUDGE A
OMNI PARKER HOUSE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS APRIL 25,1995 Welcome to the New England Circle/Citizens Roundtable. This evening's discussion, Affirmative Action and Its Impact on Society is led by JUDGE A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM JR. Professor of Jurisprudence at The John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Until he retired in 1993, Judge Higginbotham served as Circuit Judge and as Chief Judge Emeritus of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. He was appointed a district court judge in 1964 and a court of appeals judge in 1977. In addition, he has many years of experience as an attorney, and he held numerous teaching appointments at such universities as the University of Pennsylvania, New York University and Harvard Law School. His book, In the Matter of Color: Race and the American Legal Process, was published in 1978 with the hope that "...this volume will help us better understand the history we cannot escape and cause us to assume the responsibility we owe to our future." Judge Higginbotham is a graduate of Anitoch College and Yale Law School, as well as the recipient of more than 60 honorary degrees. He is married to Dr. Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham, a professor of African American Studies at Harvard. They reside in Newton, Massachusetts and have four children. This evening's moderator is MARTY LINSKY a counselor to Governor William Weld and adjunct lecturer at the John F. Kennedy School of Government. He came to the Governor's office from the Kennedy School, where he was a full-time faculty member teaching about press, leadership, politics, and public management. -
An Act to Promote Public Safety and Better Outcomes for Young Adults – S.825/H.3420
An Act to Promote Public Safety and Better Outcomes for Young Adults – S.825/H.3420 Lead Sponsors MASSACHUSETTS CURRENTLY SPENDS THE MOST MONEY ON Sen. Joseph Boncore (Winthrop) YOUNG ADULTS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AND GETS THE Rep. James O'Day (West Boylston) Rep. Kay Khan (Newton) WORST OUTCOMES Co-Sponsors Shifting 18- to 20-year-olds into the juvenile system, where Rep. Ruth Balser (Newton) they must attend school and participate in rehabilitative Rep. Christine Barber (Somerville) programming, would lower recidivism. The young adult Sen. Michael Brady (Brockton) brain is still developing making them highly amenable to Rep. Mike Connolly (Cambridge) rehabilitation. This development is influenced – Sen. Brendan Crighton (Lynn) positively or negatively – by their environment. Rep. Daniel Cullinane (Dorchester) Sen. Julian Cyr (Truro) An overly punitive approach can actually cause more Rep. Marjorie Decker (Cambridge) Rep. Marcos Devers (Lawrence) offending: Most young people "age out" of offending by their Sen. Sal DiDomenico (Everett) mid-twenties, particularly with developmentally appropriate Rep. Daniel Donahue (Worcester) interventions. Exposure to toxic environments, like adult jails Rep. Carolyn Dykema (Holliston) and prisons, entrenches young people in problematic Sen. James Eldridge (Acton) behaviors, increasing probability of recidivism. Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier (Pittsfield) Sen. Cindy Friedman (Arlington) Recidivism among young people incarcerated in the adult Rep. Sean Garballey (Arlington) corrections is more than double similar youth released Rep. Carlos González (Springfield) from department of youth services commitment Rep. Tami Gouveia (Acton) Teens and young adults incarcerated in Massachusetts’ adult Rep. Jim Hawkins (Attleboro) correctional facilities have a 55% re-conviction rate, Rep. Stephan Hay (Fitchburg) compared to a similar profile of teens whose re-conviction Rep. -
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, MA 02133 Secretary Thomas Turco Executive
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE GENERAL COURT STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, MA 02133 Secretary Thomas Turco Executive Office of Public Safety and Security C/O John H. Melander, Jr. 1 Ashburton Pl., Room 2133 Boston, MA 02133 September 16, 2020 Dear Secretary Turco, We write again with disappointment and distress at the recently redrafted regulations for the Medical Parole Program, 501 CMR 17.00. After a lengthy hearing last year only some edits were adopted. The Supreme Judicial Court invalidated previous regulations in early 2020. It is troubling that the newest regulations continue to undermine and again seem to attempt to dismantle the program. Since its adoption in April of 2018, the program has been only occasionally successful. According to your March 2020 annual report, there were 24 petitions to the program from June 2018 until July 2019. While 12 incarcerated people were diagnosed with cancer, and 8 others with “end stage” disorders, only 4 people were released during this time. The Baker/Polito administration seems to approach this program with an attitude of, at best, indifference to its effectiveness, or, at worst, open opposition to its goals. Despite repeated opportunities to get its regulations right, explicit instruction from the Supreme Judicial Court, and specific guidance from the drafters of the statute, the regulations continue to raise new barriers to release for permanently incapacitated and terminally ill incarcerated people that are entirely out of context for the law. We concentrate our criticisms on some key areas: 1. Administrative hurdles have no basis in law and were invalidated by Supreme Judicial Court When regulations are explicitly released to respond to the Buckman v.