World Happiness Report 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WORLD HAPPINESS REPORT 2013 Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs WORLD HAPPINESS REPORT 2013 Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. World Happiness: Trends, Explanations and Distribution 3. Mental Illness and Unhappiness 4. The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being 5. Restoring Virtue Ethics in the Quest for Happiness 6. Using Well-being as a Guide to Policy 7. The OECD Approach to Measuring Subjective Well-Being 8. From Capabilities to Contentment: Testing the Links Between Human Development and Life Satisfaction The World Happiness Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal agency or programme of the United Nations. WORLD HAPPINESS R EPORT 2013 Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION JOHN F. HELLIWELL, RICHARD LAYARD AND JEFFREY D. SACHS 3 23 John F. Helliwell: Vancouver School of Economics, University of British Columbia, and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) Richard Layard: Director, Well-Being Programme, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics Jeffrey D. Sachs: Director, The Earth Institute, Columbia University WORLD HAPPINESS R EPORT 2013 The world is now in the midst of a major policy terms of emotion might inadvertently diminish debate about the objectives of public policy. What society’s will to fight poverty. should be the world’s Sustainable Development Goals for the period 2015-2030? The World Fortunately, respondents to happiness surveys do Happiness Report 2013 is offered as a contribution not tend to make such confusing mistakes. As we to that crucial debate. showed in last year’s World Happiness Report and again in this year’s report, respondents to surveys In July 2011 the UN General Assembly passed a clearly recognize the difference between happiness historic resolution.1 It invited member countries as an emotion and happiness in the sense of life to measure the happiness of their people and satisfaction. The responses of individuals to these to use this to help guide their public policies. different questions are highly distinct. A very poor This was followed in April 2012 by the first UN person might report himself to be happy emotion- high-level meeting on happiness and well-being, ally at a specific time, while also reporting a much chaired by the Prime Minister of Bhutan. At the lower sense of happiness with life as a whole; and same time the first World Happiness Report was indeed, people living in extreme poverty do express published,2 followed some months later by the low levels of happiness with life as a whole. Such OECD Guidelines setting an international answers should spur our societies to work harder standard for the measurement of well-being.3 to end extreme poverty. The present Report is sponsored by the Sus- tainable Development Solutions Network. As with last year’s report, we have again assembled the available international happiness data on how people rate both their emotions and their lives as a Happiness whole. We divide the available measures into three main types: measures of positive emotions (positive The word “happiness” is not used lightly. Happiness affect) including happiness, usually asked about is an aspiration of every human being, and can the day preceding the survey; measures of negative also be a measure of social progress. America’s emotions (negative affect) again asked about the founding fathers declared the inalienable right to preceding day; and evaluations of life as a whole. pursue happiness. Yet are Americans, or citizens Together, these three types of reports constitute of other countries, happy? If they are not, what if the primary measures of subjective well-being.4 anything can be done about it? The three main life evaluations are the Cantril ladder of life,5 life satisfaction,6 and happiness with life as a whole.7 Happiness thus appears The key to proper measurement must begin twice, once as an emotional report, and once as with the meaning of the word “happiness.” The part of a life evaluation, giving us considerable problem, of course, is that happiness is used evidence about the nature and causes of happiness in at least two ways — the first as an emotion in both its major senses. (“Were you happy yesterday?”) and the second as an evaluation (“Are you happy with your life as a whole?”). If individuals were to routinely mix Outline of Report 34 up their responses to these very different questions, then measures of happiness might tell us very The first World Happiness Report presented the little. Changes in reported happiness used to widest body of happiness data available, and track social progress would perhaps reflect little explained the scientific base at hand to validate and more than transient changes in emotion. Or understand the data. Now that the scientific stage has impoverished persons who express happiness in been set, we turn this year to consider more specific issues of measurement, explanation, and policy. WORLD HAPPINESS R EPORT 2013 t In Chapter 2 we update our ranking of life supports for better lives in Sub-Saharan Africa, evaluations from all over the world, making and of continued convergence in the quality of primary use of the Gallup World Poll, since it the social fabric within greater Europe, there has continues to regularly collect and provide com- also been some progress toward equality in the parable data for the largest number of countries. distribution of well-being among global regions. We also present tentative explanations for the levels and changes of national-level and regional There have been important continental cross- averages of life evaluations. currents within this broader picture. Improvements in quality of life have been particularly notable in t In Chapter 3 we learn that mental illness is the Latin America and the Caribbean, while reductions single most important cause of unhappiness, have been the norm in the regions most affected but is largely ignored by policy makers. by the financial crisis, Western Europe and other western industrial countries; or by some combi- t Chapter 4 adopts a different perspective, looking nation of financial crisis and political and social at the many beneficial consequences of well-being instability, as in the Middle East and North Africa. (rather than its causes). Mental health and unhappiness Chapter 5 discusses values; returning to the t The next chapter focuses on mental health. It ancient insights of Buddha, Aristotle, and others shows that mental health is the single most teachers and moralists, that an individual’s values important determinant of individual happiness and character are major determinants of the (in every case where this has been studied). individual’s happiness with life as a whole. About 10% of the world’s population suffers from clinical depression or crippling anxiety disorders. t Chapter 6 looks at the way policy makers can They are the biggest single cause of disability and use well-being as a policy goal. absenteeism, with huge costs in terms of misery and economic waste. t Chapter 7 presents the OECD’s Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being and general approach, and; Cost-effective treatments exist, but even in advanced countries only a third of those who need it are in t Chapter 8 explores the link between the UN’s treatment. These treatments produce recovery rates Human Development Index and subjective of 50% or more, which mean that the treatments well-being. can have low or zero net cost after the savings they generate. Moreover human rights require that treatment should be as available for mental illness as We briefly review the main findings of each chapter. it is for physical illness. Trends, explanations and distribution Effects of well-being Chapter 2 presents data by country and continent, Chapter 4 considers the objective benefits of and for the world as a whole, showing the levels, subjective well-being. The chapter presents a broad 4 explanations, changes and equality of happiness, range of evidence showing the people who are mainly based on life evaluations from the Gallup emotionally happier, who have more satisfying lives, World Poll. Despite the obvious detrimental and who live in happier communities, are more happiness impacts of the 2007-08 financial likely both now and later to be healthy, productive, crisis, the world has become a slightly happier and socially connected. These benefits in turn flow and more generous place over the past five years. more broadly to their families, workplaces, and Because of continuing improvements in most communities, to the advantage of all. WORLD HAPPINESS R EPORT 2013 The authors of Chapter 4 show that subjective of the OECD approach are laid out more fully in well-being has an objective impact across a broad the recent OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective range of behavioral traits and life outcomes, and Well-being. The chapter also outlines progress that does not simply follow from them. They observe has been made by national statistical offices, both the existence of a dynamic relationship between before and after the release of the guidelines. happiness and other important aspects of life with effects running in both directions. Human Development Report Chapter 8 investigates the conceptual and empirical Values and happiness relationships between the human development Chapter 5 discusses a riddle in the history of and life evaluation approaches to understanding thought. In the great pre-modern traditions human progress. The chapter argues that both concerning happiness, whether Buddhism in the approaches were, at least in part, motivated by a East, Aristotelianism in the West, or the great desire to consider progress and development in religious traditions, happiness is determined not ways that went beyond GDP, and to put people at by an individual’s material conditions (wealth, the center.