DOCSLIB.ORG

COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS Executive Functions and Metacognitive Monitoring Are Not Interchangeable in Educational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS Executive Functions and Metacognitive Monitoring Are Not Interchangeable in Educational COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 1 Executive Functions and Metacognitive Monitoring Are Not Interchangeable in Educational Settings: Shared and Unique Contributions to Academic Outcomes Rina Pak-ying Lai, Michelle R. Ellefson, and Claire Hughes University of Cambridge Author Notes This manuscript is under peer review. This is not the final version. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michelle R. Ellefson, University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]. A joint-council award to the authors funded this research (ES/K010225/1: Economic and Social Research Council, Research Grants Council of HK). Thinking Games website development supported by the Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A110932 to the University of Cambridge. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. Electronic access to dataset from the entire project: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/ 852570/. The full data set for the externally funded project is available through the UK Data Service at http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/852570/. Materials used for the executive function tasks are available from http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/852658/. A preprint has been uploaded to https://psyarxiv.com/4jhnz. Initial analyses for this manuscript were conducted by Rina Pak-ying Lai in partial fulfillment of a masters degree. Thanks to (1) Geoff Martin for Thinking Games website programming; (2) Florrie Ng and Qian Wang for comments on the early research design; (3) COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 2 Annabel Amodia-Bidakowska, Emma Chatzispyridou, Yiming Han, Katherine Parkin, Annie Raff, Antonia Zachariou for data collection assistance; (4) Rosie Blunt, Hannah Bush, Claudia Chu, Shehnaz Dowlet, Ellie Frank, Anton Evans, Tanya Paes, Nelly Hu-Kwo for scoring and data entry assistance and (5) Ric Parkin for proof reading. COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 3 Abstract Executive functions and metacognition are two cognitive predictors with well- established connections to academic performance. Despite sharing several theoretical characteristics, their overlap or independence concerning multiple academic outcomes remain under-researched. To address this gap, the present study applies a latent-variable approach to test a novel theoretical model that delineates the structural links between executive functions, metacognition, and academic outcomes. In whole-class sessions, 455 children aged 9 to 14 years (M = 11.92; SD = 0.93) completed four computerized executive function tasks (cognitive flexibility, inhibition, working memory, and planning), a self-reported metacognitive monitoring questionnaire, a general cognitive ability test, and three standardized tests of academic ability. The results suggest that executive functions and metacognitive monitoring are not interchangeable in the educational context and that they have both shared and unique contributions to diverse academic outcomes. The findings are important for elucidating the role between two domain-general cognitive skills (executive functions and metacognition) and domain-specific academic skills. Keywords Executive functions, metacognition, open data, open materials, inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning, metacognitive monitoring, reasoning, numeracy, literacy COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 4 Executive Functions and Metacognitive Monitoring Are Not Interchangeable in Educational Settings: Shared and Unique Contributions to Academic Outcomes Among the various cognitive abilities that help explain individual differences in academic outcomes, the constructs of executive functions and metacognition have attracted research interests from diverse disciplines. Situated within the self-regulation framework, processes such as goal-directedness, behavioral regulation, inhibition and flexibility are fundamental skills that predict academic and learning outcomes. Despite their relevance, however, theoretical and methodological concerns constrain conclusions regarding how executive functions and metacognition relate to each other and whether they show overlapping or interacting associations with academic outcomes. Traditionally, executive functions and metacognition have been examined separately in different research traditions, but recent studies have begun to consider their theoretical and developmental similarities, as well as methodological differences (e.g., Roebers, 2017; Roebers et al., 2009). Both executive functions and metacognition are considered domain- general, “multi-faceted” constructs (e.g., Friedman et al., 2008; Georghiades, 2004); both regulate and monitor lower-order processes in a top-down approach (e.g., Diamond, 2013; Roebers & Feurer, 2016); both are relevant to learning, problem-solving, and self-regulation (e.g., Diamond, 2013; Zimmerman 2011); and both are underpinned by similar neuro- mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex (e.g., Ardila, 2008; Fleming et al., 2012). Reflecting these commonalities, they are often considered as similar conceptual phenomena. Empirically, however, their unique and shared contributions to academic performance have yet to be examined. Addressing this gap is important from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Theoretically, it is necessary to establish whether executive functions and metacognition are simply different terms for the same phenomenon in the education context. Practically, understanding the independence or interplay of effects is helpful for designing executive functions or metacognition interventions, which currently have quite modest results (e.g., Serpell & Esposito, 2016). COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 5 The interdisciplinary nature of studying executive functions and metacognition raises a methodological challenge as these cognitive constructs have different historical roots (Fernandez-Duque et al., 2000). The concept of executive functions stems from neuro- psychological research that relies on performance-based tasks and experimental methods. In contrast, metacognition, particularly procedural metacognition, is rooted in developmental/ educational psychological research that often utilizes school-related assessment methods within a classroom setting (Roebers, 2017). As such, examining both constructs in an educationally valid context might help identify the difference between their research philosophies. More specifically, does the different measurement methods most appropriate for each respective construct drive different theories? In this study, we apply an interdisciplinary approach by combining an experimental method to measure executive functions and an educational psychology method to assess metacognition. This approach can inform current theoretical and applied perspectives on the links between executive functions and metacognition as well as their individual contribution to educational outcomes (Garner, 2009). Executive Functions Executive functions are multifaceted and encompass a set of self-regulatory processes that are key to controlling thoughts and behaviors in novel or challenging situations (Hughes et al., 2010). These include many higher-order cognitive abilities, such as having mental flexibility, suppressing irrelevant information and responses (inhibition), manipulating and updating information in mind (working memory), and thinking ahead (planning) (Chan et al., 2008). Numerous studies have linked executive function skills to academic success; indeed, individual differences in executive functions explain 20-60% of the variance in learner’s academic outcomes (Roebers, 2017). The predictiveness of executive functions on literacy and numeracy achievement appears consistent across many studies (e.g., Jacob & Parkinson, 2015; Mulder et al., 2017; Schmitt et al., 2017). The association between executive functions and academic outcomes is strong across measurement tools, academic COGNITIVE PREDICTORS ACADEMIC SKILLS 6 subjects, and developmental stages (Blair & Razza, 2007; Blair et al., 2014). However, these links are not always consistent after controlling for other factors. For example, Schmitt et al. (2017) found that executive functions were predictive of both literacy and numeracy skills even after controlling for age and socioeconomic status. In contrast, Jacob & Parkinson (2015) did not find these links after age, socioeconomic status, and general cognitive ability are controlled. In younger children, executive functions contribute between 5% to 36% of the variance in early academic outcomes (Roebers, 2017). By and large, executive function skills explain about 25% of the variance in numeracy skills and 16% of the variance in literacy skills in preschooler and kindergarteners (Roebers, 2017). However, given that different components of executive functions develop rapidly and become progressively distinct with age (e.g., Best & Miller, 2010; Huizinga et al., 2006), the links with academic domains could vary between early childhood and late childhood. To date, however, fewer studies have explored these links in late childhood and early adolescence, a developmental stage where components of these constructs improved significantly (Pureza et al., 2013). It remains ambiguous whether these links are also observed in these age groups that are less well researched albeit mark an important stage of cognitive development. Ellefson et al. (2020) found strong links
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Big Five Predictors of Academic Achievement
    Journal of Research in Personality 35, 78±90 (2001) doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2309, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Big Five Predictors of Academic Achievement Sampo V. Paunonen University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada and Michael C. Ashton Brock University, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada A large-sample study (N ϭ 717) is described in which two broad Big Five factor measures were compared with two narrow personality trait measures in the predic- tion of ®nal grades in an undergraduate psychology course. The Big Five factors evaluated as predictors were Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience (or Intellect). The traits evaluated, which were constituents of the respective factors, were need for Achievement and need for Understanding. In each comparison, the lower level trait measure did better than its higher level factor measure in the predic- tion of course grades. We conclude that the aggregation of narrow trait measures into broad factor measures can be counterproductive from the points of view of both behavior prediction and behavior explanation. 2001 Academic Press Some researchers believe that the variation in human behavior can be ade- quately summarized in terms of ®ve broad dimensions of personality. Those dimensions, known as the Big Five personality factors, are typically labeled as Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism (vs Emo- tional Stability), and Openness to Experience (or Intellect). The Big Five have been recovered in many studies and in many cultures, with the analysis of both comprehensive lists of personality-descriptive adjectives (e.g., De Raad, Perugini, HrebõÂckovaÂ, & Szarota, 1998) and numerous questionnaires comprising diverse personality trait scales (see McCrae & John, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Paying Attention in Classroom on Students' Academic Achievement in Terms of Their Comprehension and Recall Ability
    2-4 February 2015- Istanbul, Turkey 684 Proceedings of INTCESS15- 2nd International Conference on Education and Social Sciences THE INFLUENCE OF PAYING ATTENTION IN CLASSROOM ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN TERMS OF THEIR COMPREHENSION AND RECALL ABILITY Turkiya Al’Omairi1*, Husam Al Balushi2 1Ms. Assistant Lecturer, Sultanate of Oman, [email protected] 2Mr. English Teacher, Sultanate of Oman, [email protected]. * Corresponding Author Abstract Students' attention in classroom and their academic achievement are two related variables, and they are reflected in students' comprehension and recall ability. However, most of the studies referred to comprehension and recall ability interchangeably and mainly used recall tasks to measure working memory capacity. Adding to that, to the best of my knowledge, there are not many studies that combine the three main variables, but they relate each one of attention and working memory capacity to achievement in an indirect way. Thus, this paper was conducted to investigate whether paying attention in class affect students' academic achievement in terms of their comprehension and recall ability. In order to measure the three main variables, which are comprehension, recall ability and attention, three different tests were used, and they were applied on a sample of two hundred English Education students in counseling psychology class. The comprehension test had three questions related to the previous lesson of counselling psychology class. For the recall ability, a task had three parts, each of which included lists of pictures or letters that the participants needed to recall their order, and the attention task was mainly adapted from the Stroop colour naming task.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association Between School-Based Physical Activity, Including Physical Education, and Academic Performance
    The Association Between School-Based Physical Activity, Including Physical Education, and Academic Performance U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Adolescent and School Health www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth Revised Version — July 2010 (Replaces April 2010 Early Release) Acknowledgments: This publication was developed for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of Adolescent and School Health (DASH) under contract #200 -2002-00800 with ETR Associates. Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The association between school- based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 5 Introduction . 8 Methods 10 Conceptual Definitions . 10 Inclusion Criteria . 10 Identification of Studies that Met the Inclusion Criteria . 11 Classification of Studies . 11 Study Coding Process . 12 Data Analysis . 13 Results . 14 School-Based Physical Education Studies . 16 Recess Studies . 19 Classroom Physical Activity Studies . 21 Extracurricular Physical Activity Studies . 24 Summary . 28 Overall Findings . 28 Findings for Physical Activity by Context . 29 Findings by Gender, Other Demographic Characteristics, and Research Design . 30 Strengths and Limitations of Review . 30 Implications for Future Research or Evaluation . 31 Implications for Schools . 32 References . 34 Appendices . 39 Appendix A: Database Search Terms . 39 Appendix B: Coding Sheet . 41 Appendix C: Glossary of Research Design Terms . 51 Appendix D: School-Based Physical Education Summary Matrix . 52 Appendix E: Recess Summary Matrix . 62 Appendix F: Classroom Physical Activity Summary Matrix . 67 Appendix G: Extracurricular Physical Activity Summary Matrix .
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Executive Functions on Academic Performance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 11 (2011) 240–244 Teachers for the Knowledge Society Cognitive control goes to school: The impact of executive functions on academic performance Laura Visu-Petraa,*, Lavinia Cheiea, Oana Bengaa,b, Mircea Micleab aDevelopmental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University bApplied Cognitive Psychology Center, Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University Abstract The general aim of the present study was to investigate EF in relation to academic performance. We chose tasks evaluating three EF dimensions: working memory (WM), inhibition (resistance to interference and negative priming), and set-shifting. Subjects (N = 70) were school-aged children in the 5th and the 8th Grades. Regression models supported the contribution of individual differences in EF performance to explaining over half of total variance in school performance, revealing the main role of WM in predicting Mathematics performance. Results are discussed in terms of relevance of meaningful assessment practices and for educational interventions. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd . Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of Masterprof team. Keywords: cognitive control, executive functions, academic performance, predictors, school-age children 1. Problem statement and motivation Executive functions (EFs) play a central role in sustaining and calibrating the development of academic skills and in school performance in general; however, few studies have directly targeted EF as a predictor and/or correlate of school readiness and achievement. According to the EF model proposed by Miyake and collaborators (2000), which received the largest empirical support for adults and children after the age of 5 (Best, Miller, & Jones, 2009; Visu-Petra, Benga, & Miclea, 2007), there are three main EF dimensions: updating, set-shifting, and inhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Conscientiousness and Academic Performance: a Mediational Analysis Nicole Conrad Saint Mary’S University, [email protected]
    International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Volume 6 | Number 1 Article 8 1-2012 Conscientiousness and Academic Performance: A Mediational Analysis Nicole Conrad Saint Mary’s University, [email protected] Marc W. Patry Saint Mary’s University, [email protected] Recommended Citation Conrad, Nicole and Patry, Marc W. (2012) "Conscientiousness and Academic Performance: A Mediational Analysis," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Vol. 6: No. 1, Article 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060108 Conscientiousness and Academic Performance: A Mediational Analysis Abstract Previous research has established that a relationship exists between the personality trait of conscientiousness and academic achievement. The current study extends prior research by using a path analysis model to explore various proximal traits that may mediate this relationship in a sample of two hundred and twenty three undergraduate university students. Consistent with previous research, a strong positive relationship was found between conscientiousness and academic performance as measured by final grades. Of greater importance, two factors were found to mediate this relationship: Academic Self-Efficacy and Test Anxiety. The current study illustrates the complex nature of the relation between personality traits and academic achievement and indicates that personality likely has a distal effect on academic performance through more proximal characteristics. Keywords Big five, Personality, Conscientiousness, Academic achievement;, Academic performance Creative Commons License Creative ThiCommons works is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 LAicttreinbutse.ion- Noncommercial- No Derivative Works 4.0 License IJ-SoTL, Vol. 6 [2012], No. 1, Art. 8 Conscientiousness and Academic Performance: A Mediational Analysis Nicole Conrad Saint Mary’s University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada [email protected] Marc W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Academic Achievement and Mental Health of the Special School Students
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 21, Issue12, Ver. 7 (December. 2016) PP 49-52 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org A Study of Academic Achievement and Mental Health of the Special School Students M.Sathiyaraj1, and Dr. R.Babu2. 1. Research scholar, Department of Education, Annamalai University, India. 2. Professor of Education & Dean, Faculty of Education, Annamalai University, India. ABSTRACT:- An attempt has been made to construct and validate the academic achievement and mental health scales among the special school students. Well structured scales were administered among them. The sample consists of 750 special school student randomly selected from the schools situated in Tamilnadu state. The scales were validated using‘t’ test and ‘F’ test. The present research discusses about the level of academic achievement and mental health among the special school students. Keywords: academic achievement, mental health, special school student. I. INTRODUCTION It is known fact that the special school students dependent status and expressing the emotions in an unbalanced way participating in social process like competition, rivalry, assimilating social skill and values, participating actively in sharing problems of the family obviously the individual at this stage are confronted with problems due to emerging self. Special education (also known as special needs education, aided education, vocational education, and limb care authority education) is the practice of educating students with special educational needs in a way that addresses their differences and needs. Ideally, this process involves the individually planned and systematically monitored arrangement of teaching procedures, adapted equipment and materials and accessible settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Function As a Mediator Between SES and Academic Achievement Throughout Childhood
    International Journal of Behavioral Development 2017, Vol. 41(1) 94–104 Executive function as a mediator ª The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: between SES and academic achievement sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0165025415603489 throughout childhood journals.sagepub.com/home/ijbd Gwendolyn M. Lawson and Martha J. Farah Abstract Childhood socioeconomic status (SES), as measured by parental education and family income, is highly predictive of academic achievement, but little is known about how specific cognitive systems shape SES disparities in achievement outcomes. This study investigated the extent to which executive function (EF) mediated associations between parental education and family income and changes in reading and math achievement in a sample of 336 children between the ages of 6 and 15 years from the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development. Verbal memory was simultaneously modeled as a comparison candidate mediator. SES predicted significant changes in reading and math achievement over a two-year time period. Furthermore, executive function, but not verbal memory, was found to partially mediate the relationship between SES variables and change in math achievement. Collectively, these results suggest that executive function may be an important link between childhood SES and academic achievement Keywords academic achievement, executive functions, socioeconomic status Childhood socioeconomic status (SES) is a powerful predictor of opposed to ‘hot’) EF, that is EF in emotionally neutral contexts academic achievement throughout childhood and adolescence (Zelazo & Carlson, 2002), and further subdivide EF into working (e.g., Bradley & Corwyn, 2002; Reardon, 2011). Research aimed memory, attention shifting, and response inhibition (Miyake at understanding the SES achievement gap in terms of child cogni- et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Variations on Children's Performance on the Marshmallow Test Across Age, Socioeconomic Status, Ethnicity and Body Mass Index
    Variations on cperformance on the marshmallow test across age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and body mass index Submitted by Jeffrey P. Salik Student No: 412112 Supervised by Professors Rumen Pozharliev and Willem Verbeke In partial fulfillment of the requirements To obtain a degree in MSc in Business and Economics (Specialization in Marketing) Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam June 2016 Abstract Better self-regulatory competency in children had been closely linked with better academic performance, better adjustment, and the ability to cope with frustration and stress, among many others. Self-regulation among (N=159) preschoolers aged 41.0 to 84.9 months of various socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds living in the Netherlands, the Philippines and United Arab Emirates were evaluated using W. Although significant difference on the performance on the marshmallow test was detected on age and income, there were no significant differences across ethnic backgrounds, income-to-needs ratio and body mass index (BMI). Correlation between performance index and ethnicity was also found to be significant. Pertinent policy implications of these findings were thoroughly presented towards the end of this paper. Keywords: Self-regulation, age, income, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) Acknowledgements Heartfelt thanks and appreciation are extended to Professors Rumen Pozharliev and Willem Verbeke and for their invaluable support and assistance in making this study possible. Their openness in giving advice and suggestions, and their tireless dedication to promote and advance research on this subject have greatly motivated me to work hard towards the timely completion of this paper. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the following school administrators who welcomed me to their respective schools Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Extent Can the Big Five and Learning Styles Predict Academic Achievement
    Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.7, No.30, 2016 To What Extent Can the Big Five and Learning Styles Predict Academic Achievement Yaman Köseoğlu Lecturer; Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract Personality traits and learning styles play defining roles in shaping academic achievement. 202 university students completed the Big Five personality traits questionnaire and the Inventory of Learning Processes Scale and self-reported their grade point averages. Conscientiousness and agreeableness, two of the Big Five personality traits, related positively with all four learning styles, namely synthesis-analysis, methodical study, fact retention and elaborative processing. On the other hand, neuroticism was found to have a negative relationship with all four learning styles. Furthermore, both extraversion and openness appeared to have positive relationships with elaborative processing. The results of the Big Five personality traits explained 17% of the variance in grade point average and learning style added 5% , indicating that both contribute to academic performance. Further, the relationship between openness and GPA was mediated by synthesis-analysis and elaborative processing, both reflective learning styles. These findings suggest that when students process information thoroughly and meticulously and combine such an approach with intellectual curiosity, their academic performance will be enhanced. The impacts of these findings on teaching techniques and curriculum design are also deliberated. Keywords: Learning styles, reflective, synthesis-analysis, Big Five, conscientiousness, openness, academic achievement, 1. Introduction The way of processing, encoding, recalling, organizing and applying the knowledge assimilated changes from student to student in universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Cognitive G and Academic Achievement G One and the Same G? an Exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman Tests
    INTELL-00687; No of Pages 16 Intelligence xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Intelligence Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests Scott Barry Kaufman a,⁎, Matthew R. Reynolds b, Xin Liu c, Alan S. Kaufman d, Kevin S. McGrew e,f a Psychology Department, New York University, USA b The University of Kansas, USA c NCS Pearson, Clinical Assessment, Bloomington, MN, USA d Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA e Woodcock-Muñoz Foundation, USA f University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA article info abstract Article history: We examined the degree to which the conventional notion of g associated with IQ tests and Received 13 January 2011 general cognitive ability tests (COG-g) relate to the general ability that underlies tests of read- Received in revised form 14 January 2012 ing, math, and writing achievement (ACH-g). Two large, nationally representative data sets Accepted 14 January 2012 and two independent individually-administered set of test batteries were analyzed using con- Available online xxxx firmatory factor analysis procedures: (a) the Kaufman-II sample (N=2520), organized into six age groups between 4–5 and 16–19 years, tested on both the Kaufman Assessment Battery Keywords: for Children-2nd ed. (KABC-II) and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-2nd ed. Intelligence (KTEA-II) Comprehensive Form; and (b) the WJ III sample (N=4969), organized into four General cognitive ability age groups between 5–6 and 14–19 years, tested on both the Cognitive and Achievement Academic achievement batteries of the Woodcock–Johnson-3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence and Verbal Short-Term Memory/Working Memory: Their Interrelationships from Childhood to Young Adulthood and Their Impact on Academic Achievement
    Journal of Intelligence Article Intelligence and Verbal Short-Term Memory/Working Memory: Their Interrelationships from Childhood to Young Adulthood and Their Impact on Academic Achievement Wolfgang Schneider * and Frank Niklas Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg 97070, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-931-3182352 Received: 22 February 2017; Accepted: 7 June 2017; Published: 16 June 2017 Abstract: Although recent developmental studies exploring the predictive power of intelligence and working memory (WM) for educational achievement in children have provided evidence for the importance of both variables, findings concerning the relative impact of IQ and WM on achievement have been inconsistent. Whereas IQ has been identified as the major predictor variable in a few studies, results from several other developmental investigations suggest that WM may be the stronger predictor of academic achievement. In the present study, data from the Munich Longitudinal Study on the Genesis of Individual Competencies (LOGIC) were used to explore this issue further. The secondary data analysis included data from about 200 participants whose IQ and WM was first assessed at the age of six and repeatedly measured until the ages of 18 and 23. Measures of reading, spelling, and math were also repeatedly assessed for this age range. Both regression analyses based on observed variables and latent variable structural equation modeling (SEM) were carried out to explore whether the predictive power of IQ and WM would differ as a function of time point of measurement (i.e., early vs. late assessment). As a main result of various regression analyses, IQ and WM turned out to be reliable predictors of academic achievement, both in early and later developmental stages, when previous domain knowledge was not included as additional predictor.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Academic Achievement in Adolescents: the Role of Maturity, Intelligence and Personality
    Fabia Morales-Vives, Elisa Camps, and Jorge Manuel Dueñas Psicothema 2020, Vol. 32, No. 1, 84-91 ISSN 0214 - 9915 CODEN PSOTEG Copyright © 2020 Psicothema doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.262 www.psicothema.com Predicting academic achievement in adolescents: The role of maturity, intelligence and personality Fabia Morales-Vives, Elisa Camps, and Jorge Manuel Dueñas Universitat Rovira i Virgili Abstract Resumen Background: Very few studies have examined whether the degree of Predicción del rendimiento académico en adolescentes: el papel de adolescents’ maturity has any effect on their academic performance. la madurez, la inteligencia y la personalidad. Antecedentes: se han Moreover, there are no studies that show whether maturity explains realizado muy pocos estudios sobre la posible infl uencia de la madurez variance additional to that explained by intelligence and personality. sobre el rendimiento académico. Además, no hay estudios que muestren si For this reason, the main aim of the current study was to determine how la madurez explica varianza adicional a la explicada por la inteligencia y la psychological maturity, the Big Five personality traits and mental aptitudes personalidad. Por ello, el principal objetivo de este estudio es determinar contribute to the prediction of adolescent academic performance. Method: cómo la madurez, los Cinco Grandes y las aptitudes mentales contribuyen 305 adolescents took part in the study. We performed correlations, a la predicción del rendimiento académico en adolescentes. Método: la multiple regression analysis and structural equation analysis. Results: As muestra está formada por 305 adolescentes. Calculamos correlaciones, expected, results show that the main predictor is intelligence. The results análisis de regresión múltiple y ecuaciones estructurales.
    [Show full text]