The U.S. Banking System Laws, Regulations, and Risk Management the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The U.S. Banking System Laws, Regulations, and Risk Management the U.S Felix I. Lessambo The U.S. Banking System Laws, Regulations, and Risk Management The U.S. Banking System Felix I. Lessambo The U.S. Banking System Laws, Regulations, and Risk Management Felix I. Lessambo School of Business Central Connecticut State University New Britain, CT, USA ISBN 978-3-030-34791-8 ISBN 978-3-030-34792-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34792-5 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations. This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland CONTENTS 1 Overview of the US Banking System 1 Part I The Legal Background 2 Banking Laws 9 3 The Crypto-currency Regulations 21 4 Anti-Money Laundering Laws 37 Part II Actors: Regulators and Banks 5 The Regulators 69 6 Commercial Banks and Savings Banks 93 7 Investment Banks 99 8 Merchant Banks 115 v vi CONTENTS 9 Credit Union 125 10 Public Bank—Bank of North Dakota 139 Part III Risks and Banking Regulation 11 Risks in the Banking Industry 159 12 Banking Regulation Principles 177 13 Banks’ Capital Adequacy 185 14 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and the Dodd–Frank Stress Testing 209 Part IV Financial Statements and Statement Analysis 15 Commercial Banks’ Financial Statements 243 16 Commercial Bank’s Financial Ratios Analysis 259 Part V Auditing and Bankruptcy 17 Bank Audit Systems 279 18 Bank Bankruptcy 297 Glossary 317 Bibliography 323 Index 329 ACRONYMS AIRB Advance Internal Rating-Based Approach AMA Advanced Measurement Approach BCBS Basel Committee on Banking Supervision CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review CCF Credit Conversion Factors CECL Current Expected Credit Loss CET1 Common Equity Tier 1 CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Bureau CFTC Commodity and Futures Trading Commission CLF Central Liquidity Facility CRA Community Re-investment Act CSBC Conference of State Bank Supervisors DFA Dodd–Frank Act DFAST Dodd–Frank Act Stress Testing EBA European Bank Authority ECL Expected Credit Loss EL Expected Loss ERBA External Ratings-Based Approach FDCPA Fair Debt Collection Practices Act FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FED Federal Reserve Bank FFIEC Federal Financial Institution Examinations Council FinCEN Financial Crimes Enforcement Network FOMC Federal Open Market Committee FRBNY Federal Reserve Bank of New York FSOC Financial Stability Oversight Council vii viii ACRONYMS GSIB Global Systemically Important Banking Organization IRBA Internal Rating-Based Approach (for credit risk) ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association LCR Liquidity Coverage Ratio LIBOR London Inter-Bank Offered Rate LGD Loss Given Default MBS Money Services Business NCU National Credit Union NCUSIF National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund OCC Offce of the Comptroller of the Currency OFAC Offce of Foreign Assets Control OTS Offce of Thrift Supervision PD Probability of Default RW Risk Weight RWAs Risk-Weighted Assets SA Standardized Approach SAR Suspicious Activity Reporting SDR Special Drawing Rights SEC Securities and Exchange Commission SIPA Securities Investment Protection Act SMA Standardized Measurement Approach SOMA System Open Market Account TDF Term Deposit Facility LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 10.1 Total loan portfolio (Source BND Financial Statements [2018]) 142 Fig. 10.2 Agricultural loan portfolio (Source BND Financial Statements [2018]) 144 Fig. 10.3 Business loan portfolio (Source BND Financial Statements [2018]) 145 Fig. 10.4 Home loan portfolio (Source BND Financial Statements [2018]) 146 Fig. 10.5 Student loan portfolio (Source BND) 147 Fig. 13.1 Calibration of the capital framework (Source BIS) 200 Fig. 13.2 Basel 3-Phase-in arrangements (Source BIS) 201 Fig. 14.1 Unemployment in severely adverse and adverse scenarios 211 Fig. 14.2 GDP growth in severely adverse and adverse scenarios 214 Fig. 14.3 Aggregate common equity capital ratio/CCAR 2018 226 Fig. 15.1 Stylized bank balance sheet 244 Fig. 18.1 Bank closing summary (Source FDIC [2019]) 298 Fig. 18.2 FDIC Resolutions (Source FDIC [2019]: Resolutions Handbook) 301 ix LIST OF TABLES Table 7.1 Top investment banks in the world 101 Table 12.1 CAMELS 179 Table 12.2 Five evaluation methods 182 Table 13.1 Standardized approach 191 Table 13.2 Business lines/Beta factor 191 Table 14.1 Bank holding companies 227 Table 14.2 EU tested banks 232 xi LIST OF CITED CASES – CFTC v. McDonnell and CDM, EDNY (08/23/2018). – Securities and Exchange Commission v. REcoin Group Foundation, et al., Civil Action No Securities and Exchange Commission v. Reginald, Case 1:19-CV-04625-CBA-RER.17-cv-05725 (E.D.N.Y., fled September 29, 2017). – Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tambone, 550 F.3d 10 6 (1st Cir. 2008). – Securities and Exchange Commission v. Reginald, Case 1:19-CV-04625-CBA-RER. – Securities and Exchange Commission v. KIK Interactive Inc. Case 1:19-cv-05244. – United States v. Nurgio, SDNY (September 19, 2016). – United States v. Velastegui, 199 F.3d 590, 593 (2d Cir. 1999). xiii CHAPTER 1 Overview of the US Banking System 1.1 GENERAL The US banking system is one of the oldest, largest, and most important sectors of our overall economy. There were no modern banks in colonial America nor American banks as late as 1781.1 By the 1830s, to get away from the politicization and corruption involved in legislative charter- ing, a few states began to enact “free banking” laws. Without a central bank to provide oversight of banking and fnance, the expanding bank- ing system of the 1830s, 1840s, and 1850s suffered from some major problems, even as it supplied the country with ample loans to fnance economic growth. One problem was fnancial instability. Banking crises occurred in 1837, 1839–1842, and 1857 years when many banks had to suspend convertibility of their banknotes and deposits into coin because their coin reserves were insuffcient. A good number of these banks failed or became insolvent when borrowers defaulted on their loan payments. The banking crises led to business depressions with high unemployment.2 The passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 was a watershed in US banking history. In 1913, after three-quarters of a century without 1 Richard Sylla: The US Banking System: Origin, Development, and Regulation, the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History (2009–2019). 2 Richard Sylla: The US Banking System: Origin, Development, and Regulation, the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History (2009–2019). © The Author(s) 2020 1 F. I. Lessambo, The U.S. Banking System, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34792-5_1 2 F. I. LESSAMBO a central bank and a period punctuated by a number of banking crises, Congress created a new central bank, the Federal Reserve System. In 1927, Congress passed the McFadden Act, which allowed national banks to become competitive with state banks by granting them jurisdiction to branch out within the state they were originally located to the extent that state law permitted. The banking architectural was strengthened with the Banking Act of June 1933 (“the Glass–Steagall Act”) introduced federal deposit insurance, federal regulation of interest rates on deposits, and the separation of commercial banking from invest- ment banking. Further, the Glass–Steagall Act strengthened the Federal Reserve’s powers. The American bank regulatory system is based upon the concept of dual oversight by federal and state agencies, and the primary regulators differ based upon a specifc bank’s charter. The structure and regulation of the US banking system differs from the rest of the world. The US system is made of big commercial and small banks coexisting, with more small banks holding the larger share in number. In contrast to the US system, other developed countries such as Japan, Germany, France, and Canada’s banking systems tend to favor larger national institutions.3 The US banking industry also is less highly concentrated than the banking industries in many other industrial countries. A study on “industry con- centration ratio” by the Bank for International Settlements concluded that the fve largest banks’ US ratio was 26.6%, while the ratio for Canada was 77.1%, France stood at 70.2%, and Switzerland at 57.8%. In 1999, Congress repealed the Glass–Steagall Act that had effectively separated commercial and investment banking. The business of banking, long stifed by regulation, suddenly became more exciting. Increasingly, banks were not limited in their lending by the size of their deposit bases. They could obtain more funding to make more loans and purchase new forms of securities by accessing the Wall Street and international money markets.
Recommended publications
  • Nonprofit and Mutual Firms in the Development of the U.S. Personal Finance Industry
    Organizational Form and Industry Emergence: Nonprofit and Mutual Firms in the Development of the U.S. Personal Finance Industry R. Daniel Wadhwani Eberhardt School of Business University of the Pacific [email protected] This article examines historical variations in the ownership and governance of firms in the U.S. personal finance industry between the early nineteenth century and the Great Depression. It focuses, in particular, on mutual savings banks and their role in the development of the intermediated market for savings accounts. Economic theories of commercial nonprofits and mutuals usually emphasise the advantages of such ownership and governance structures in reducing agency and monitoring costs in markets that suffer from information asymmetries in exchanges between firms and their customers. While I find some evidence to support these theories, I also find that mutual savings banks predominated in the early years of the industry because the form offered entrepreneurial advantages over investor-owned corporations and because in some states they benefitted from regulatory and political advantages that joint-stock savings banks lacked. Their relative decline by the early twentieth century was the result of increasing competition in the market for savings deposits, the loosening of regulatory barriers to entry, and changes in public policy that reduced the transaction, innovation and regulatory advantages that the mutual savings bank form had once held. The article draws out the theoretical implications for our understanding of the historical role of nonprofit and mutual firms. Keywords: nonprofit; trusteeship; mutual; cooperative; savings banks; governance; ownership; organizational form; entrepreneurship; innovation. 1 Introduction In recent years, business historians have devoted increasing attention to understanding variation in the organizational forms of modern enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Technological Change by Committee: Adoption of Computers in Spanish and British Savings Banks (Circa 1960-1988)
    MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Managing technological change by committee: Adoption of computers in Spanish and British savings banks (circa 1960-1988) Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo and Maixe-Altes, J. Carles Bangor Business School, Universidad A Coru~na (Spain) June 2009 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27086/ MPRA Paper No. 27086, posted 29. November 2010 / 09:02 MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE BY COMMITTEE: ADOPTION OF COMPUTERS IN SPANISH AND BRITISH SAVINGS BANKS (circa 1960-1988) Bernardo Bátiz-Lazo is Professor of Business History and Bank Management at Bangor Business School, Bangor University, College Road, Bangor Gwynedd LL57 2DG, United Kingdom (tel +44 (0)1248 382277; e-mail: [email protected]. J. Carles Maixé-Altés is Profesor Titular de Universidad, Economic History at the Department of Applied Economics I - University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain (ph. +34 981 167000 ext. 2569; fax +34 981 167070); e-mail: [email protected] 1 MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE BY COMMITTEE: ADOPTION OF COMPUTERS IN SPANISH AND BRITISH SAVINGS BANKS (circa 1960-1988) Abstract - This article explores how savings banks managed the process of computerization through ad hoc management committees articulated under the aegis of national associations (with an emphasis on developments in Spain). The combination of cash payments (and low penetration of cheques) in the Spanish retail sector together with increasing administrative costs, acted as incentives for Spanish savings banks embracing applications of computer technology (and specifically data processing infrastructure) to articulate viable solutions for cost reductions, offer alternative payment systems to cash and facilitate greater diversification of their business portfolio within retail banking.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross, D.M. (2002) 'Penny Banks' in Glasgow, 1850-1914
    Ross, D.M. (2002) 'Penny banks' in Glasgow, 1850-1914. Financial History Review, 9 (1). pp. 21-39. ISSN 0968-5650 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/6739/ Deposited on: 27 August 2009 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Financial History Review 9 (2002), pp. 21–39 Printed in the United Kingdom © 2002 Cambridge University Press. ‘Penny banks’ in Glasgow, 1850–19141 DUNCAN M. ROSS University of Glasgow When William Callender of Royal Bank of Scotland’s Glasgow office died in May 1868, there was found, folded in the pocket of his greatcoat, a handwritten list of those ‘penny banks’ that he had played a significant role helping to create.2 It begins with Barony Penny Bank, opened on 15 May 1852, and concludes with Working Men’s Provident Bank in Partick, that commenced on 18 March 1865. Over the intervening period, Callender had been involved in the promotion of 23 others, including some located far from Glasgow, such as at Broughty Ferry, Dundee; Padiham, Yorkshire; and Greenwich, Kent. That Callender contributed so much to the ‘penny bank’ movement and appeared to value these institutions so highly that he carried this note about with him at all times supports the Glasgow Herald’s 1860 description of his relationship to ‘penny banks’ as one of ‘the first who made the principle a living fact’.3 It also reveals something of the commitment of bank officers working in other institutions to the ‘penny bank’ cause. This was very much part of the middle-class and philanthropic attitude that sustained ‘penny banks’ and saw them develop as one of the most remarkable social phenomena of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyds TSB Group Archives: Catalogue
    Lloyds TSB Group Archives: Catalogue TD/495/d/2 Brass name plate (TSB of Eastern England 1975 record) [nd] Level: Item TD/495/d/3 Book-type home safes (2 blue, 2 green, 1 red) 1940 (East Anglian TSB records) [nd] Level: Item TD/495/d/4 Book-type home safe (black) (Norfolk and 1930 Norwich Savings Bank record) [nd] Level: Item TD/498 Records of Guildford branch Level: Fonds TD/498/a Operation 1816-1825 Level: Series TD/498/a/1 Depositors' ledger (indexed). Gives name; place 1816-1825 of residence; occupation; date; amount deposited; amount withdrawn; interest; and balance. (Guildford Savings Bank record) Level: Item TD/503 Records of Halford Street branch, Leicester Level: Fonds TD/503/b Publicity Level: Series TD/503/b/1 Press cutting from 'Leicester Evening Mail' 1958 concerning opening of branch by Alderman Sidney Brown, lord mayor of Leicester. Includes photograph of exterior of branch (Leicester Savings Bank record) Level: Item TD/513 Records of Hanley branch, Stoke-on-Trent Lloyds TSB Group Archives: Catalogue Level: Fonds TD/513/b Publicity Level: Series TD/513/b/1 Black and white photographs of exterior of 1965 branch (North Staffordshire Trustee Savings Bank record) Level: Item TD/513/b/2 Black and white photographs of interior showing 1965 views of banking hall and counter (North Staffordshire Trustee Savings Bank record) Level: Item TD/513/b/3 Photograph Level: Item TD/515 Records of Hardshaw Street branch, Saint Helens Level: Fonds TD/515/a Operation Level: Series TD/515/a/1 Depositors' ledger, numbered '0 and 1'.
    [Show full text]
  • We're Here to Help the Smaller, Independent Businesses of Britain Start, Run and Grow
    Superbrands UK Annual Vol.20 TSB Brand History 1810 The Trustee Savings Bank is established by Reverend Henry Duncan of Ruthwell. 1986 TSB Group plc is founded. 1995 TSB is bought by Lloyds Bank. TSB disappears as a separate brand, living only as part of the name LloydsTSB. In 1810 the Reverend Henry Duncan did something revolutionary. 2013 TSB separates from Lloyds Banking He built the Trustees Savings Bank, whose sole purpose was to help hard-working Group and becomes an independent entity, tasked by the EU with increasing local people thrive. Six years ago, TSB, Britain’s challenger bank, was re-born based competition in the British banking sector after the banking crisis. on his values, to make banking better for all UK consumers 2014 TSB Bank plc goes public with successful IPO. 2015 TSB is bought by Sabadell, Market DID YOU KNOW? But celebrating isn’t enough. Through the Spain’s fi fth largest banking group. In 2013 the big fi ve banks controlled more than TSB Local Charity Partnership programme, 85% of all UK bank accounts. Following the every branch and site supports a local, The Classic Plus 2016 TSB is recognised as Britain’s banking crisis, TSB was created to bring more independently registered community group most recommended high competition to UK banking and actively make current account appeared with fundraising and volunteering. TSB Partners street bank. banking better for all consumers. and customers raise more than £500,000 for in independently produced 450 causes every year. Furthermore, on Local TSB delivers a different kind of retail banking that Best Buy Charities Day 2018 TSB celebrated the great It’s notoriously diffi cult to get customers it calls ‘Local Banking’.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Services Integration Worldwide: Promises and Pitfalls
    FINANCIAL SERVICES INTEGRATION WORLDWIDE: PROMISES AND PITFALLS Harold D. Skipper, Jr. Thomas P. Bowles Chair of Actuarial Science C.V. Starr Chair of International Insurance Georgia State University Atlanta, GA/USA 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................3 THE MULTIPLE MEANINGS AND FORMS OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INTEGRATION................3 The Meaning of Financial Services Integration.........................................................................................3 Structures for Delivering Integrated Financial Services............................................................................5 THE ECONOMICS OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INTEGRATION..........................................................8 Cost Effects ...............................................................................................................................................8 Revenue Effects.......................................................................................................................................10 Relationship between Effects and Operational Structure ........................................................................11 MANAGEMENT ISSUES IN INTEGRATION ........................................................................................11 Group Structure .......................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland's Public Sector Balance Sheet April 2021
    Ireland’s Public Sector Balance Sheet April 2021 Department of Finance | Ireland’s Public Sector Balance Sheet Page | i Contents Page 1 Introduction 2 2 Ireland’s Static Public Sector Balance Sheet 2000-2019 3 2.1 Overview of Ireland’s static public sector balance sheet 3 2.2 Structure of Ireland’s public sector balance sheet 4 2.3 Non-financial assets 6 2.4 Public sector investment 7 2.5 Financial net worth 8 2.6 Evolution of public sector net worth 2000 12 2.7 Other economic flows 14 2.8 Ireland’s public sector metrics in an international context 16 2.9 Summary 17 3 Public corporations 18 3.1 Overview of Ireland’s public corporations 18 3.2 Financial performance 19 3.21 Non-financial corporations 20 3.22 Financial corporations 21 3.3 Potential fiscal risk 22 3.4 Summary 24 4 Intertemporal Public Sector Balance Sheet 25 4.1 Overview 25 4.2 Medium-term fiscal path 26 4.3 Long-term fiscal path 27 4.4 Summary 29 5 Conclusion 30 Tables, Figures, Boxes and Annexes Tables XX Table 1 Ireland’s public sector balance sheet, end-2019 4 Table A1 The coverage of Ireland’s public corporations 31 Table A2 Non-financial corporations high-level financial assessment metrics 32 Table A3 Financial corporations high-level financial assessment metrics 32 Table A4 Key variables under baseline assumptions 34 Figures Figure 1 Public sector balance sheet 3 Figure 2 Public sector total assets and liabilities by sector, end-2019 5 Figure 3 Composition of non-financial assets for the public sector, end-2019 6 Figure 4 Public sector investment 8 Figure 5 Public
    [Show full text]
  • A Dozen Reasons to a Dozen Reasons to Sbarclays Is the Only
    A Dozen Reasons To A Dozen Reasons To SBarclays is the only British highstreetbankwith a ajorinvestment in South Africa. Barclays own 40% of Barclays National, South Africa's biggest bank, which controls 30% of the country's banking business. * arclays in London has constantly participated in massive international loans to South Africa state agencies, including the electricity corporation EScOM which built the Koeberg nuclear power plant, a crucial element in the development of South Africa's nuclear weapons capability. fl Barclays National operates in Namibia, although the South African military occupation of Namibia is illegal according.to the United Nations and international law. SBarclays National backs the South African armed forces. The bank services the troops occupying Namibia and advertises in South African military publications. ~ Barclays National operates in the bantustans, thereby giving recognition to these barren territories arbitrarily allocated to the black community which have been recognised by no government other than South Africa. B arclays National has undermined the international oil embargo against South Africa through funding the strategically vital Sasol plants which make oil from coal. ~ arclays National is one of the largest taxpayers to the South African government. f Several directors of Barclays National serve as trustees to the South African Foundation which distributes South African propaganda internationally. MM Barclays has financed arms sales to South Africa. * Barclays is one of the most active members of the UK-South Africa Trade Association and is the largest financer of trade between the two countries. SBarclays is the largest distributor of Krugerrands in theUK. These gold coins are a vital source of foreign exchange for the South African authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in UK Payment Clearing Systems
    Recent developments in UK payment clearing systems The past three years have seen a major reorganisation of the administration of the London-based payment clearing systems. The most significant and far-reaching development has been a change from a system run by a smaff number of large 'clearing' banks to one owned and controffed by a wider membership and open to any appropriately regulated financial institution which meets explicit and objective criteria for entry. This article describes this new structure, and touches upon some other payment system developments in the United Kingdom. The need for change money transmission services have not been able to enter the market on equitable terms, the government should A payment clearing system has existed in London for then consider whether the joint ownership of the clearing some two hundred years and for much of that time it has systems for cheques and electronic payments by the been based in premises known as the Bankers' Clearing members of the CLCB ...is stit! appropriate'. House. For many years this institution was owned and controlled by the major retail banks through the The outcome of this growing pressure was agreement, in Committee of London Clearing Bankers (CLCB). March 1984, by all ten participating banks(4)in the Bankers' Participation in the clearings was also granted to other Clearing House to set up a working party of senior bankers banks, including the Bank ofEngland in 1864, the under the chairmanship of Denis Child, Director and Co-operative Bank and the Central Trustee Savings Bank Deputy Group ChiefExecutive of National Westminster in 1975 and the National Girobank in 1983, but these Bank, to review the organisation, membership and control banks did not share in the ownership of the Clearing of the payment clearing systems in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    Price range prospectus 9 June 2014 This prospectus (the “Prospectus”) comprises a prospectus relating to TSB Banking Group plc (the “Company”) prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) made under section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) (the “FSMA”). The Prospectus has been filed with the FCA and has been made available to the public in accordance with section 3.2 of the Prospectus Rules. Application will be made to the FCA acting in its capacity as competent authority for the purpose of Part VI of the FSMA (the “UK Listing Authority”) for all of the Ordinary Shares of the Company to be admitted to the premium segment of the Official List of the FCA (the “Official List”) and to trading on the London Stock Exchange plc’s (the “London Stock Exchange”) main market for listed securities (together, “Admission”). Admission to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities constitutes admission to trading on a regulated market. Conditional dealings in the Ordinary Shares are expected to commence on the London Stock Exchange on 20 June 2014. It is expected that Admission will become effective, and that unconditional dealings in the Ordinary Shares will commence, on 25 June 2014. All dealings in Ordinary Shares before the commencement of unconditional dealings will be of no effect if Admission does not take place and such dealings will be on a “when issued” basis and at the sole risk of the parties concerned. No application has been, or is currently intended to be, made for the Ordinary Shares to be admitted to listing or trading on any other exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath School of Management July 2007
    University of Bath PHD A comparison of British and German banking strategies in the context of European financial integration between 1993 and 2003 Janssen, Sven Award date: 2007 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 A comparison of British and German banking strategies in the context of European financial integration between 1993 and 2003 Sven Janssen A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath School of Management July 2007 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisational Change and the Computerisation of British and Spanish Savings Banks, 1965-1985
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Organisational change and the computerisation of British and Spanish savings banks, 1965-1985 Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo and Maixe-Altes, J. Carles June 2006 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/804/ MPRA Paper No. 804, posted 13 Nov 2006 UTC The computerisation of British and Spanish savings banks, 1960-2000 Bernardo Bátiz-Lazo and J. Carles Maixé-Altés Bernardo Bátiz-Lazo is a senior lecturer at the Bristol Business School, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom (tel +44 (0)117 328 36 10; fax +44 (0)117 328 22 89); e-mail: [email protected]. J. Carles Maixé-Altés is a senior lecturer of Economic History at Departamento de Economía Aplicada I - Universidad de A Coruña , Campus de Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain (tel +34 981 167000 ext. 2569; fax +34 981 167070); e-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this article we explore organisational changes associated with the automation of financial intermediaries in Spain and the UK. This international comparison looks at the evolution of the same organisational form in two distinct competitive environments. Changes in regulation and technological developments (particularly applications of information technology) are said to be responsible for enhancing competitiveness of retail finance. Archival research on the evolution of savings banks helps to ascertain how, prior to competitive changes taking place, participants in bank markets had to develop capabilities to compete. Keywords : comparative financial markets, United Kingdom, Spain, market structure, technological change, regulatory change, savings banks, banks. * WORK IN PROGRESS. DO NOT QUOTE * 1 Introduction Alton Gilbert’s landmark compilation warned that, conspicuously absent from the analysis of structure-conduct-performance in banking, was an assessment of the effects regulatory change has had in determining bank performance (Gilbert, 1984).
    [Show full text]