Fisher German LLP Severn Trent Water Limited

Land west of Forest Road, Dunstall, , , DE13 8BL

Planning, Design & Access Statement

on behalf of: Severn Trent Water Limited by: Jenny Salt BA (Hons) MA MRTPI 01530 567 475 date: February 2015 revision: 001

Severn Trent Water

Severn Trent Water Limited (STWL) is a regulated business with statutory responsibilities for the provision of water and sewerage services to over eight million people in an area of 21,000 square kilometres stretching from the Bristol Channel to the Humber, and from midWales to the East Midlands.

Severn Trent Water is currently implementing its Asset Management Plan for AMP5 (April 2010 to March 2015), which is the mechanism by which the regulator OFWAT defines in a five year capital expenditure programme for all water companies. Investment during the AMP5 period is in response to a number of key drivers. These drivers include providing a continuous supply of quality water, dealing effectively with waste water, and promoting an effective regulatory regime.

Scope of Project/Background

This planning statement has been prepared for STWL to support a planning application for the change in use of the land for the provision of a sewage pumping station on land to the west of Forest Road, Dunstall Cross, Staffordshire. The development will include the provision of a new access, concrete turning head, a motor control kiosk, a septicity dosing kiosk, two bauer couplings, a vent stack, two road gullies and five bollards.

STWL/External Driver

An application has been made for first time sewerage under Section 101a of the Water Industry Act 1991, requesting that local properties are connected to the public sewer. To enable this to take place, the proposed development is required.

Site Location/Description

The site is located to the west of Forest Road, Dunstall at grid reference SK 17542 20664. The site is approximately 7.5km south west of the centre of Burton on Trent and approximately 2.5km north west of the centre of Barton Under Needwood.

The site bounds Forest Road to the east. Immediately adjacent to the site, to the south, is a garage, which does not form part of an existing dwelling in the area. Further to the south are a run of residential properties, the nearest of which is approximately 30m south of the proposed development site. To the west and north of the site, lies the remainder of the agricultural field, which is currently used for grazing.

The site is located within the National Forest, but is not subject to any other statutory designations.

Existing Use

The site currently comprises the south eastern corner of an agricultural field, which is used for grazing.

A hedgerow bounds the proposed site on the east and south edges, with the north and west boundaries open to the existing field. The site comprises grassland.

Planning History

There is no known relevant planning history for this site.

______

2 of 16

Proposed Development

It is proposed to change the use of land to the west of Forest Road to provide a new sewage pumping station. The works associated with the provision of the new sewage pumping station, which form part of this planning application, include the following:

• Change of use of the land for a sewage pumping station • Creation of a new access • Provision of concrete turning head • Provision of motor control kiosk • Provision of a septicity dosing kiosk • Provision of two bauer couplings • Provision of a vent stack • Provision of two road gullies • Provision of five bollards

It is also proposed to provide manhole/chamber covers for the wet well, combined value and flowmeter chamber and the inlet. The existing surface water chamber within the proposed access way will be rebuilt. Two road gullies will be provided at the site entrance, to replace the existing drainage grips. There will also be a davit socket provided next to the wet well. All of these elements of the works are situated below ground level, therefore they are considered to be permitted development, as they fall under Part 16, Class A(a) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995.

It is also proposed to provide a timber post and rail fence around the perimeter of the proposed site and a new access gate at the site entrance. Outside of the application site boundary, it is proposed to replace the existing field gate to the north of the proposed site replace the post and rail fence along the eastern edge of the agricultural field in which the proposed site is situated. This fence will be situated on the inner side of the existing hedgerow along Forest Road. All of these elements of the works are under 1 metre in height, therefore they are considered to be permitted development, as they fall under Part 2, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995.

Preapplication Discussions

Staffordshire County Council Highways Department Preapplication discussions have been carried out with Jake Derry of Staffordshire County Council’s Highways Department. A copy of his response is included in Appendix A.

The advice received confirmed that there is a drainage grip at the centre of the proposed access. Due to the lack of a drainage grip on the opposite site of the road, ponding occurs at this location. It is advised that any new access at this point would need to include measures to maintain highway drainage.

With regards to visibility Mr Derry advises that visibility to the north from the proposed access is acceptable. He is of the opinion that the existing road sign to the south will not obstruct visibility but if during access works it becomes apparent there is an issue then the sign can be relocated at that stage.

In respect of the temporary working compound, Mr Derry advises that the use of the existing field access to the north is an unsuitable location due to the vertical alignment of Forest Road to the north. Whilst the proposals include the replacement of the existing field access, the temporary working compound will be served by the creation of the new access point off Forest Road to the south of the field to ensure adequate visibility.

______

3 of 16

Staffordshire County Council Environmental Specialists Preapplication advice has been received from Staffordshire County Council’s Environmental Specialists dated 19th April 2013. The response gives advice on ecology, landscape, forestry, archaeology and historic landscape character, historic built environment and rights of way. A copy of the response received is included in Appendix B.

Ecology The preapplication advice obtained advises that a survey and assessment will be required to include consideration of effects on the following: • Designated nature conservation sites, both statutory and nonstatutory; • Protected species • Species and habitats of principal importance for biodiversity (Defra list) • UK and Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species • Geological features

Landscape The preapplication advice obtained advises that the proposed development should have regard to the landscape character type, Surveyor Enclosed Plateau Farmlands in the Needwood Claylands. The proposed development should be informed by, and sympathetic to landscape character and quality and should contribute to Landscape Maintenance. Substantial emphasis should be placed on ensuring that development blends unobtrusively into the landscape and does not lead to the loss of characteristic features. The location of the pumping station and kiosk will need to be carefully considered to ensure that landscape and visual impact is minimised, and if necessary appropriate mitigation is incorporated into the proposal and submitted with the application. Where possible, the structures should be located where they would be subsequently viewed in association with existing buildings and their impacts therefore minimised, and established hedges and trees retained and protected.

Forestry The preapplication advice obtained confirms that the site is situated with the National Forest and that an outline of the improvement should be submitted so that the application can be assessed with the National Forest policies in mind.

Archaeology and Historic Landscape Character The preapplication advice obtained confirms that the Historic Environment Record does not record the presence of designated heritage assets within the area of the proposed scheme. However, it is identified that the single undesignated cropmark (PRN 55363), located approximately 100m to the south of Yew Tree Farm, does possibly relate to a medieval or earlier field boundary.

It is also identified that the proposed scheme lies within an area of planned enclosure as identified on the Historic Landscape Characterisation for the county. This probably dates to the reorganisation of the agricultural landscape in the area during the nineteenth century and may also have given rise to the development of the small regular courtyard farmstead at Yew Tree Farm identified as part of the Staffordshire Historic Farm Building Survey.

As part of the preapplication discussions, it was advised that there may be a requirement for building recording of the farmstead at Yew Tree Farm and an archaeological watching brief during groundworks. This was advised due to the scale and potential proximity of the proposed works to Yew Tree Farm and the possible medieval field boundary to the south. It was however advised that the scope of any archaeological mitigation would become clearer once design details are available at full application stage.

Historic Built Environment The preapplication advice obtained advised that there are no historic built environment constraints affecting this proposal.

______

4 of 16

Rights of Way The preapplication advice obtained advises that if the proposed works to Forest Road affect Rights of Way where they meet/cross the road, then discussions will be required with the SCC Rights of Way section.

Amount/Scale

Should planning permission be granted, the operational site area will comprise approximately 839.5m2.

It is proposed to install a new access point measuring 5.3m wide and a concrete turning head measuring a maximum of 39.1m from the highway and a maximum of 15.4m in width across the site. 6.855m of hedgerow will need to be removed in order to form the new access.

A single motor control kiosk is proposed, measuring 3.6m in length, 0.6m in width and 2m in height. The kiosk will be situated on a level plinth, measuring a maximum of 0.225m above ground level.

A single septicity dosing kiosk is proposed, measuring 2.8m in length, 2.335m in width and 2.1m in height. The kiosk will be situated on a level plinth, situated as ground level with a depth of 0.15m.

Two bauer couplings are proposed to be installed on the site. These will measure 0.9m in height to the centre of the pipe, as shown on plan ref: A5S/11276/PA/080 Rev B.

A single 0.225m diameter vent stack is proposed, measuring 3m in height.

Two road gullies will be provided at the site entrance, to replace the existing drainage grips.

Five bollard are proposed on site. These will measure 0.75m in height, as shown on plan ref: A5S/11276/PA/079 Rev B.

Layout

The layout of the proposed scheme is identified on plan ref: A5S/11276/PA/078 Rev F, submitted in support of this planning application.

The site is located adjacent to the highway (Forest Road) within a pasture field. There is an existing mature hedge on the eastern and southern boundary, however in order to further screen the site, a landscaping hedge will be planted to the northern and western boundary of the proposed operational site. The operational equipment on site is the minimum necessary for operational purposes, and is designed to be as unobtrusive as possible.

A new access will be created directly off Forest Road into the site. A turning head will be provided within the site, as shown on plan ref: A5S/11276/PA/078 Rev F.

The septicity dosing kiosk and monitor control kiosk will be located adjacent to the northern boundary of the site, alongside the proposed hedgerow.

A bauer coupling will be provided upon the combined valve and flowmeter chamber and another upon the inlet manhole.

The proposed vent stack will be located immediately to the east of the motor control kiosk, adjacent to the northern boundary of the site.

______

5 of 16

The two road gullies will be provided at the site entrance, to replace the existing drainage grips.

The five bollards are located along the kerbing of the turning head, to ensure vehicles do not accidentally drive into the wells/chambers on site.

Appearance

Access to the site will be via a new gateway. The access to the site from the highway will be concrete which will continue into the site itself. The proposed turning head within the site will also be concrete with the remaining area being gravel.

The two proposed kiosks and the vent stack will be holly green in colour (BS 4800: 14C39).

The proposed bauer couplings will be galvanised mild steel with a ductile iron pipe. The bauer couplings will have a ruby red epoxy coating.

The proposed bollards will be constructed from concrete, therefore they will be a grey colour in appearance.

A timber post and rail fence will be provided around the perimeter of the site. The timber fence will also continue along the eastern boundary of the field to the existing field access.

Access/Accessibility

Access to the proposed site will be achieved directly from Forest Road via a new entrance gate.

The internal access will be consist of a concrete turning area within the site, and is designed to allow STWL vehicles to enter and exit the site in forward gear. The turning area is required to allow tankers to manoeuvre on site, when visiting.

Landscaping

The existing indigenous hedgerow along the east and south boundaries of the proposed site are to be retained, apart from a small section along the east boundary to accommodate the new entrance and the drainage pipes. The existing hedgerow to be retained will be protected during the construction works.

At the proposed site entrance, a small section of hedgerow will be reinstated once the works are complete. The proposed hedge mix is identified on the Detailed Landscape Proposals plan (ref: 398.01) submitted with this application.

A mixed indigenous hedge will be planted along the northern and western boundaries of the site. A rabbit proof mesh will be attached to the proposed timber post and rail fence to the outside of the hedgerow and to a 1m high post and wire fence on the inside of the hedgerow, to ensure successful growth of the hedgerow.

Flood risk

The site is located within Flood Zone 1, which is not susceptible to flooding. A flood risk assessment has therefore not been provided with this application.

______

6 of 16

Ecology

As advised within the preapplication advice obtained from Staffordshire County Council’s Environmental Specialists in April 2013, an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was carried out by Milner Ecology in October 2013. This report has since been updated in February 2015.

The report includes details of the proposed sewage pumping station as well as the associated pipework, which does not form part of this planning application as it is permitted development.

The report identifies that the hedgerow, which is to be removed to provide the sewage pumping station, has low species diversity present. The loss of the hedgerow, therefore, will require no specific mitigation beyond that required for breeding birds. The report advises that the hedgerow planting around the proposed sewage pumping station will more than compensate for the loss of this small section of existing hedgerow. As best practice any hedgerow planting should be done using native species of local provenance.

The report advises that as a significant period of time has elapsed since the ecological survey was undertaken it is recommended that a preconstruction check for badgers is undertaken to ensure that the species has not excavated any setts in the interim period. The pre construction check would also need to check for breeding birds.

It is recommended that the hedgerow is removed outside of bird breeding season. If this is not practicable, a visual inspection of the shrub by a suitably experienced ecologist would be required to ensure that no birds are nesting within the impacted sections. Guidance is provided within the report in the case of a nest being discovered.

Archaeology

It was identified as part of the preapplication advice obtained from Staffordshire County Council’s Environmental Specialists that the Historic Environment Record (HER) does not record the presence of designated heritage assets within the area of the proposed scheme. However, a single undesignated crop mark (PRN 55363) approximately 100m to the south of Yew Tree Farm does possibly relate to a medieval or earlier field boundary. The proposed scheme lies within an area of planned enclosure as identified on the Historic Landscape Characterisation for the county. This probably dates to the reorganisation of the agricultural landscape in this area during the nineteenth century and may also have given rise to the development of the small regular courtyard farmstead at Yew Tree Farm identified as part of the Staffordshire Historic Farm Building Survey.

Given the scale of the proposed development and siting of the proposal over 100m from the undesignated cropmark, it is not considered that an archaeological works are required.

Listed Buildings

The nearest listed building is Grade II listed Old Hall Farmhouse, which is located approximately 770m south east of the proposed site. Given there are no designated heritage assets within immediate proximity of the proposed site, the proposal will not result in an adverse impact on any Scheduled Ancient Monuments or listed properties.

Amenity The nearest property is located 30m to the south of the proposed development site. There is an existing garage located adjacent to the proposed site in addition to an established hedgerow. These will help to screen the proposed development from the nearest property.

______

7 of 16

The next nearest property is located approximately 60m to the north of the proposed pumping station. The proposed hedgerow along the northern and western boundary of the site, in addition to the existing mature hedgerow to the southern and eastern boundaries, will provide sufficient screening of the above ground structures on the site, when viewed from the property, and therefore will not negatively impact on the amenities of the occupiers.

Further Information

Please refer to the following drawings and reports when reading this statement: • Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey (Milner Ecology) – February 2015 • Planning application drawings: o Location plan – A5S/11276/PA/076 Rev A o Existing Site Layout – A5S/11276/PA/077 Rev A o Proposed Site Layout – A5S/11276/PA/078 Rev F o Septicity Dosing Kiosk A5S/11276/PA/079 Rev B o Motor Control Kiosk A5S/11276/PA/080 Rev B o Detailed Landscaping Proposals – 398.01

Planning Policy

Development proposals are required to comply with relevant development plan policies unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The following policies are considered pertinent to this proposal:

National Planning Policy

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in March 2012 and outlines the Government’s planning policies for . It identifies sustainable development as the key principle underpinning planning and highlights that there are three dimensions to sustainable development – economic, social and environmental. The document also outlines 12 ‘core planning principles’ including securing high quality design; supporting a low carbon future, including the consideration of flood risk; taking account of the different roles and characters of different areas; and encouraging the effective use of land.

National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) The NPPG provides guidance on water supply, wastewater and water quality. It states that adequate water and wastewater infrastructure is needed to support sustainable development. A healthy water environment will also deliver multiple benefits, such as helping to enhance the natural environment generally and adapting to climate change.

Local Planning Policy

The relevant local planning policy comprises:

Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy 2010 – 2026 (2013) The Staffordshire and StokeonTrent Joint Waste Core Strategy was published in March 2013 and provides a framework for decision making for waste related development within the Council’s jurisdiction.

Policy 1.1 – General Principles: The policy states that the development of new sustainable waste management facilities will be granted where it is demonstrated that the proposal will lead to the protection of human health and the environment. Furthermore, the overall benefits of the scheme such as environmental, social or economic must outweigh any material planning objections. ______

8 of 16

Policy 2.3 - Broad Locations: Identifies that waste is to be dealt with as close as possible to where it arises – reducing the requirement to transport waste great distances. Section B of the policy states that proposals of a local scale will be supported if they are located in or close to the ‘other significant settlements’.

Policy 3.1 - General Requirements for New and Enhanced Facilities: Proposals must be fully contained within well designed purpose built buildings, be appropriate in scale and character to their surroundings and be compatible with nearby uses.

Policy 4.1 Sustainable Design: The policy outlines that proposals for waste management facilities should be designed and operated to high environmental standards, avoiding unacceptable adverse impacts and minimising adverse impacts.

Policy 4.2 – Protection of Environmental Quality: Support will be given to the development of waste management facilities which do not give rise to materially harmful impacts.

East Staffordshire Council Core Strategy The New Local Plan for Borough Council began to be examined in October 2014. The Inspectors issued his initial findings, to which amendments have been resubmitted by East Staffordshire Borough Council. The Council is currently awaiting the dates for the examination process to recommence.

East Staffordshire Local Plan Saved Policies Policy CSP6: National Forest encourages the enhancement of built development through related landscaping and ensures new development relates well to its National Forest setting.

Policy NE1: Development outside Development Boundaries states that in order for development outside development boundaries to be acceptable, the development must be close to an existing settlement and providing facilities for the general public or local community which are reasonably accessible on foot, by bicycle or by public transport. Within this category, the proposed development much not adversely affect the amenities enjoyed by existing land users; the siting and environmental impact are compatible with the character of the surrounding area; the design of the structures relate satisfactorily to the proposed site and its setting; landscaping associated with the proposal takes into account both the immediate impact and distant views; and the access roads can accommodate traffic likely to be generated by the proposed development in terms of number, size and type of vehicles.

Policy NE14: National Forest Planting Schemes states that in assessing the adequacy of a planting scheme for individual development proposals within the boundary of the National Forest, the Borough Council will have regard to the aims of the National Forest Strategy and criteria including, the existing landscape character of the site and the surrounding locality, the extent to which National Forest planting guidelines have been followed and, any physical, ecological, archaeological or environmental constraints affecting the site.

Policy NE15: National Forest Implementation of Planting Schemes states that the implementation of planting and landscaping schemes for approved new development in the National Forest will be secured by means of conditions, or the negotiation of a planning obligation, or a combination of those measures appropriate to the individual circumstances of the application.

Planning Policy Summary

______

9 of 16

The proposal is required in order to comply with an application made by local residents for first time sewerage under Section 101a of the Water Industry Act 1991, requesting that local properties are connected to the public sewer. The proposed siting of the new sewage pumping station is therefore located as close as appropriate to the affected houses, whilst also sited in the corner of an existing field to minimise its impact on the surrounding landscape. The proposal therefore complies with policies 2.3 of the Joint Waste Core Strategy and NE1 of the Local Plan Saved Policies.

The proposed above ground structures have been sited around the perimeter of the proposed operational site to minimise their visual impact on the neighbouring properties and the surrounding landscape. The above ground kiosks are also coloured holly green in order for the development to blend into the hedgerow adjacent. The design and appearance of the proposed development is considered to comply with policies 3.1 and 4.1 of the Joint Waste Core Strategy and NE1 of the Local Plan Saved Policies.

It is proposed to retain the hedgerows along the south and east boundaries of the proposed sewage pumping station. A new hedgerow will be planted along the north and west boundaries of the site to help screen the development from the wider area. The proposed landscaping is considered to comply with policies CSP6, NE1, NE14 and NE15 of the Local Plan Saved Policies.

Summary

This planning application proposes the following, in order to connect nearby residential properties to the public sewer, following an application under section 101a of the Water Industry Act 1991:

• Change of use of the land for sewerage works • Creation of a new access • Provision of concrete turning head • Provision of motor control kiosk • Provision of a septicity dosing kiosk • Provision of two bauer couplings • Provision of a vent stack • Provision of two road gullies • Provision of five bollards

In light of the supporting evidence provided in this statement, it is considered that the proposed development is in full compliance with both national and local planning policy. It is therefore respectfully requested that planning permission is granted for the proposed works.

______

10 of 16

Appendix A

Preapplication advice received from Staffordshire County Council’s Highways Team

______

11 of 16

______

12 of 16

Appendix B

Preapplication advice received from Staffordshire County Council’s Environmental Specialists

______

13 of 16

════════════════════════════════════════════════ Staffordshire Directorate of Place County Council Internal Memorandum ════════════════════════════════════════════════

To: Julie Castree-Denton From: Ali Glaisher DATE RECEIVED

Principal Ecologist A OR I

ACTION BY RECEIVED ACTIONED Date: 19/04/13 Ext: x7254 INITIALS FILE REF

Your Ref: PAD1073 My Ref: EC3410ES/AMG

════════════════════════════════════════════════ Copies to: ECU Consultations ════════════════════════════════════════════════ Subject: PAD1073; Dunstall Cross - Change of use of land to a Sewage Pumping Station ════════════════════════════════════════════════

In response to your email dated April 5 th 2013 the submission has been assessed in regard of Waste and Structure Plan policies and legal requirements and information/consideration of issues will be required as detailed below.

Ecology

Survey and assessment will be required in line with Staffordshire County Council requirements for biodiversity for planning application validation, see http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/environment/eLand/planners- developers/biodiversity/development/biodiversitysurvey/BiodiversitySurveyandAsses sment.aspx

In line with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and relevant legislation, the assessment should include consideration of effects on the following: • Designated nature conservation sites, both statutory and non-statutory; • Protected species • Species and habitats of principal importance for biodiversity (Defra list) • UK and Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species • Geological features Ecological survey and assessment should follow published guidelines, e.g. IEEM Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment and should be based on up-to-date information. Survey should be carried out by appropriately experienced and qualified personnel at appropriate times of year for the habitats and species covered and using published/accepted methodologies. Survey and impact assessment should be informed by records search including Staffordshire Ecological Record. The assessment should include proposals for mitigation of adverse impacts and for enhancement of biodiversity, in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. Regard should be had to how the proposal might contribute to meeting UK and

______

14 of 16

Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan targets and to emerging national and local policy regarding Green Infrastructure and ecological connectivity.

There are extensive records of farmland birds, a UKBAP priority, in this area, therefore impacts on this species group should be considered.

Landscape

Developments in this area should have regard to the relevant landscape character type (in this case, Surveyor Enclosed Plateau Farmlands in the Needwood Claylands given in Planning for Landscape Change – Supplementary Planning Guidance to the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan, 1996-2011. Development should be informed by, and sympathetic to landscape character and quality, in order to conform to Structure Plan Policy NC2, and should contribute to Landscape Maintenance (the landscape policy objective for this area). Planning for Landscape Change (the User’s Guide) advises that where the policy objective is Landscape Maintenance this indicates a high quality landscape and substantial emphasis should be placed on ensuring that development blends unobtrusively into the landscape and does not lead to the loss of characteristic features. For this reason the location of the pumping station and kiosk will need to be carefully considered to ensure that landscape and visual impact is minimised, and if necessary appropriate mitigation is incorporated into the proposal and submitted with the application. Where possible I suggest that structures are located where they would be subsequently viewed in association with existing buildings and their impacts therefore minimised, and established hedges and trees retained and protected.

Forestry

The site lies within the National Forest, although the “change of use” application may not directly be affected by Planning Policies relating to the National Forest, the implications of the necessary works required, will be. Therefore at the point on assessing change of use, an outline of the improvements should be submitted so that the application can be assessed with these policies in mind.

Archaeology and Historic Landscape Character

The Historic Environment Record (HER) does not record the presence of designated heritage assets within the area of the proposed scheme although a single undesignated cropmark (PRN 55363) approximately 100m to the south of Yew Tree Farm does possibly relate to a medieval or earlier field boundary. The proposed scheme lies within an area of planned enclosure as identified on the Historic Landscape Characterisation for the county. This probably dates to the reorganisation of the agricultural landscape in this area during the nineteenth century and may also have given rise to the development of the small regular courtyard farmstead at Yew Tree Farm identified as part of the Staffordshire |Historic Farm Building Survey.

Taking into consideration the scale of the proposed scheme and potential impacts upon the historic Yew Tree Farm and the possible medieval field boundary to the south, there may be a requirement for building recording (of the farmstead) and an ______

15 of 16

archaeological watching brief during groundworks. The need for and scope of any archaeological mitigation would become clearer once design details are available presumably at the full application stage. In the interim the Principal Archaeologist Stephen Dean would welcome the opportunity to discuss this scheme further with representatives of Severn Trent Water.

Historic Built Environment

There are no historic built environment constraints affecting this proposal

Rights of Way

Should proposed works to Forest Road affect Rights of Way where they meet/cross the road discussions will be required with the SCC Rights of Way section – contact is Paul Rochfort Principal Rights of Way Officer.

______

16 of 16