Outcomes of Genetic Testing in Adults with a History of Venous Thromboembolism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 180 Outcomes of Genetic Testing in Adults with a History of Venous Thromboembolism Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services http://www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10061-I Prepared by: The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center Investigators Jodi B. Segal, M.D., M.P.H. Daniel J. Brotman, M.D. Ashkan Emadi, M.D., Ph.D. Alejandro J. Necochea, M.D., M.P.H. Lipika Samal, M.D. Lisa M. Wilson, M.S. Matthew T. Crim, M.Sc., M.A. Eric B. Bass, M.D., M.P.H. AHRQ Publication No. 09-E011 June 2009 i This report is based on research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10061-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment. This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied. ii This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders. Suggested Citation: Segal JB, Brotman DJ, Emadi A, Necochea AJ, Samal L, Wilson LM, Crim MT, Bass EB. Outcomes of Genetic Testing in Adults with a History of Venous Thromboembolism. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 180. (Prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence- based Practice Center under contract no. HHSA 290-2007-10061-I). AHRQ Publication No. 09- E011. Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. iii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. This report was requested and funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Office of Public Health Genomics (OPHG). The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions and new health care technologies. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments. To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations. The EPCs work with these partner organizations to ensure that the evidence reports and technology assessments they produce will become building blocks for health care quality improvement projects throughout the Nation. The reports undergo peer review prior to their release. AHRQ expects that the EPC evidence reports and technology assessments will inform individual health plans, providers, and purchasers as well as the health care system as a whole by providing important information to help improve health care quality. We welcome comments on this evidence report. They may be sent by mail to the Task Order Officer named below at: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, or by e-mail to [email protected]. Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H. Director Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Beth A. Collins Sharp, Ph.D., R.N. Gurvaneet Randhawa, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Director, EPC Program Task Order Officer, Center for Outcomes and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention iv Acknowledgments The EPC thanks Renee F. Wilson, Dr. Olaide Odelola, and Ritu Sharma for their assistance with the final assembly and formatting of this report, and Dr. Gurvaneet Randhawa for his valuable insight. v Structured Abstract Objective: To address whether Factor V Leiden (FVL) testing alone, or in combination with prothrombin G20210A testing, leads to improved clinical outcomes in adults with a personal history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or to improved clinical outcomes in adult family members of mutation-positive individuals. Data sources: Searches of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, The Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo© through December 2008. Review methods: We focused on the analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility of these tests. Each included article underwent double review for data abstraction and assessment of study quality. We pooled the results of studies addressing the clinical validity of these tests when there were sufficient data. Other evidence was summarized in evidence tables. We graded the evidence by adapting a scheme recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group by assessing the limitations affecting individual study quality, the certainty regarding the directness of the observed effects in the studies, the precision and strength of the findings, and the availability (or lack) of data to answer the relevant key question. Evidence for each sub-question was graded as high, moderate, or low. Results: We reviewed 7,777 titles and included 124 articles. No direct evidence addressed the primary objective. However, high-grade evidence supported the conclusion that tests for the detection of FVL and prothrombin G20210A have excellent analytic validity. Most clinical laboratories test for these mutations accurately. Heterozygosity [odds ratio (OR) =1.56 (95 percent confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.12)] and homozygosity [OR=2.65 (95 percent C.I. 1.2 to 6.0)] for FVL in probands are predictive of recurrent VTE. Heterozygosity for FVL predicts VTE in family members [OR=3.5 (95 percent C.I. 2.5 to 5.0)] as does homozygosity for FVL [OR=18 (95 percent C.I. 7.8 to 40)]. Heterozygosity for prothrombin G20210A is not predictive of recurrence in probands [OR=1.45 (95 percent C.I. 0.96-2.2)]. Evidence is insufficient about heterozygosity for prothrombin G20210A in family members and insufficient about homozygosity for prothrombin G20210A. A single study supported the hypothesis that clinicians might change management based on test results. There was high-grade evidence that anticoagulation reduces recurrent events in probands with FVL or prothrombin G20210A; however, there was low-grade evidence that the relative reduction with treatment is comparable to that seen in individuals without mutations. There was moderate evidence to support the conclusion that neither harms nor benefits of testing have been demonstrated conclusively. Decision-analysis models suggest that testing may be cost-effective in select individuals. Conclusions: There is no direct evidence that testing for these mutations leads to improved clinical outcomes in adults with a history of VTE or their adult family members. The literature supports the conclusion that while these assays have high analytic validity, the test results have variable clinical validity for predicting VTE in these populations and have only weak clinical utility. v Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 Evidence Report...........................................................................................................................15 Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................17 Venous Thromboembolism........................................................................................................3 Diagnosis and Treatment ...........................................................................................................4 Genetic Mutations Associated with VTE: FVL and Prothrombin G20210A............................4 Methods for Identifying Mutations............................................................................................5 Objectives of this Evidence Report............................................................................................5 Chapter 2. Methods..........................................................................................................................7 Establishing a Technical Expert Panel.......................................................................................7 Analytic Framework ..................................................................................................................7