DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of a Meeting of the Hook Parish Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of a Meeting of the Hook Parish Council MINUTES OF A MEETING OF HOOK PARISH COUNCIL HELD at the conclusion of the Planning Committee on Tuesday evening 7 August 1990 in the Community Hall off Ravenscroft Hook PRESENT: Councillors P Boswell R Diacon J Morgan P Jennions Mrs M Winwood D J Deadman 80. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were submitted from Councillors P Edmonds, Mrs R Flowers, Mrs J Bonnin and County Councillor P Balmer. 81. TEN MINUTE RULE The Chairman invited members of the public present to speak upon Parish matters relative to the meeting. Mrs Bezant of 'Hollies' Reading Road made the following statements : a) She questioned why the 40 MPH speed limit was still in existence down Reading Road when that road was designated as 'Access Only' route. Parish Councillor P Boswell gave a suitable reply to Mrs Bezant. b) She made a further comment relating to the Parish Council's decision not to support Odiham Parish Council in a motion that they were putting forward to the National Association of Parish Councils. Parish Councillor J Morgan gave a suitable response to Mrs Bezant. Mr J Clements of 25 Bell Meadow Road requested to know whether or not Hook Parish Council should have sought compulsory purchase powers for the cemetery in a similar manner to that action now being taken by South Warnborough Parish Council. The Clerk gave an explanation of the situation relating to the purchase of land at Hook and the purchase of land at South Warnborough. 82. MINUTES The Minutes of the meeting held on 10 July 1990 were confirmed and signed as a correct record. 83. HOOK JUNIOR SCHOOL - FOOTPATH With reference to Minute No. 58 (10.7.90) the Clerk confirmed that he had written a further letter to the Director of Technical Services together with a letter to the County Council relating to the improvement to the public right of way which crossed this land. 84. GRAND PARADE - OBSTRUCTION With reference to Minute No. 61 (10.7.90) the Clerk confirmed that he had written to Prudential but had not received any information back._ The situation was noted. 85. ADMINISTRATION OF LEISURE FACILITIES Further to Minute No. 76c(10.7.90) Parish Councillor J Morgan confirmed that a meeting to discuss the terms of reference would be called in the not too distant future. 86. HIGHWAY MATTERS With reference to Minute No. 77 (10.7.90) the Clerk confirmed that he had invited the Chief Inspector Johnson of Hampshire Constabulary to a meeting dates of which he had supplied for September, October and November. That with regard to the destination boards in Station Road he understood the Hi hw y Authority would be removing these and he was yet to talk to Mr R Percival in the Planning Office in relation to the missing footpath beside the relief road. ../0VER 2 87. REPORT OF DISTRICT COUNCILLOR P JENNIONS District Councillor P Jennions reported that at the latest District Council Development Control meeting, although he had argued that the industrial units at Murrell Green complex should not be sub-divided, the case had been lost because the Highway Authority could see no objection to the proposal. He commented that the only consolation in the discussion was that the Highway Authority were still considering some road improvement in this location for vehicles travelling from Hartley Wintney and turning left into the site. 88. REPORT OF CHAIRMEN a) Planning Committee - the Minutes of the meeting held on 24 July 1990 were confirmed b) Amenity Committee - the Minutes of the Amenity Committee meeting held on 24 July 1990 were confirmed 89. STREET LIGHTING Further to Minute No. 56 (10.7.90) the Clerk reported that he had met Mr Coughlin on site and submitted a letter which referred to the recent meeting and the Southern Electricity Board were confirming that they would have to install a cable across the open space from existing street lights within the development. He had requested for a set of low voltage cable drawings to see if there were any IV cables in the vicinity that might be of more use and the Clerk confirmed that they were looking at the preparation of a quotation for 3 lighting points. Referring back to the lights along Station Road it was confirmed that a number of lights had been jointed and were in good working order and that Southern Electricity would made every effort to make sure the remaining jointing work was completed by the end of August. That a new path light had been installed between Holt Way and the A30 and should now be in working order. Members noted the situation. 90. HIGHWAY MATTERS a) Station Road - Street Signing A letter was submitted from the Area Surveyor, Hampshire County Council, which indicated that so far as the broken sign Station Road Hook was concerned, the sign was defunct and would be removed as soon as possible. b) Flooding on A30 Holt Way In this same letter from the Area Surveyor he indicated that the flooding on the A30 at the junction of Holt Way appeared to occur by the A30 discharging down Holt Way and as this was not a public highway the Area Surveyor felt he could not progress this matter but he confirmed that it was a public right of way on foot being Footpath No. 18 and although maintenance of a ditch alongside this length of footpath was normally held to be the responsibility of adjoining landowners, he would write to the Recreation Officer at Winchester to see if it could be included in the maintenance programme. His letter concluded by saying that the overgrown nature of the speed limit signs on road in Hook would be dealt with. 91. STREET NAMING AND NUMBERING a) Office Development Osborn Way Hook A letter was submitted from the Chief Executive, Hart District Council, which indicated that the District Council were not in a position to name private roads therefore the name suggested by the Parish Council could not be used in this instance. Members noted the situation. b) Middle Mead Hook - A letter was submitted from the Director of Technical Services, Hart District Council, which indicated that he could not erect signs showing house numbers in Middle Mead. Members noted the situation and requested the Clerk should respond to the letter; that they felt numbering should be provided together with notices relating to 'Leading to' on street naming signs where roads led from one to another. ../OVER 3 92. GRANT APPLICATIONS Members considering applications for grants as set out below and comments and decisions were made as stated: a) Hook Community Playgroup - RESOLVED that no grant be provided b) Operation Romanian Villages - RESOLVED that a grant of £10 be made to this organization c) Wessex Cancer Trust - RESOLVED that no grant be made to this organization d) National Assoication of Parish Councils - RESOLVED that no grant be made to this organization 93. DEVELOPMENT AT JUNCTION OF A30/EIMS ROAD HOOK A copy letter was submitted from the solicitors (Messrs Simons and Simons) who acted on behalf of Landene Development. They stated their client had had seats made and that seats would be installed early in September. The letter explained that their clients were anxious to design and install a seat that would be sufficiently robust to withstand any attacks which might be due to local vandalism and for this reason their clients had spent some time in formulating the design which would be satisfactory in this respect. Members noted the situation. 94. AUDIT YEAR ENDED 31.3.90 The Clerk reported that the Council's auditors, Messrs Peat, Marwick, McLintock, had completed the audit and he had signed the statement which would be returned to them. 95. COMMUNITY ADVISORY SCHEME (C A ) HAMPSHIRE A letter was submitted from the Hampshire County Council which stated, inter alia, that following major reassessment of the workload imposed on the small emergency planning team to more effectively apply the limited resources they had decided not to embark on a structured training programme for the forthcoming academic year starting in September 1990 but that support would continue to be given to Parishes and/or Community Groups which had identified a viable and sustainable community volunteer organization within their areas which was provided for in the Home Office document 'Emergency Planning Guidance for Local Authorities'. The letter stated it was the intention of the County Council to leave the making of local arrangements to the leaders within the Communities and that if it were intended to undertake any training or exercise activities these should be communicated_ to the County Council for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses for those volunteers involved. Similarly the emergency planning team would be on hand to provide assistance to the local training programme when requested. The letter also indicated that each Community Adviser remaining active in Hampshire had been advised separately and in this connection Mr John Clements of 25 Bell Meadow, who was in attendance, confirmed he had received a similar letter. A short discussion ensued from which it was RESOLVED that the Clerk should write a suitable letter back to Hampshire County Council thanking them for their letter, expressing concern at the turn of events and explaining that as the Hook Parish Council had an active Community Adviser the Parish Council would be claiming reimbursement of any expenses incurred as set out in their letter. 96. LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSALS - HOOK COMMON A letter from the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Naturalists' Trust to all Commoners was read to the meeting from which it was noted that Crest Homes who were developing land to the north of Bartley Heath had put an application to the Department of the Environment to exchange land at Bartley Heath, Hook.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas
    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan for Hart 2018 – 2023
    Biodiversity Action Plan for Hart 2018 – 2023 Contents Introduction………………………………………,,,,,,………………… 3 Purpose of this Action plan………………………………..…………… 4 Biodiversity Achievements 2012-17……………………….….…...…… 5 What is biodiversity and why is it important? …………..…………….. 7 Overview of the biodiversity resource in Hart …………..…...………. 9 Designated sites in Hart…………………………...……..…………… 11 Nature conservation sites managed by HDC………….………..….… 17 Action Plan 2018-23………………………………….…………….…. 19 2 1. Introduction 1.1 The natural environment in Hart has experienced large changes over the past century, in common with most of south eastern England. However, there remains an extremely diverse natural environment in the district, rich in different habitats and species. Hart is characterised by a mosaic of farmland, ancient woodlands, lowland heathlands and water courses. There is also a varied built environment from newer towns such as Fleet and Yateley to rural towns and villages such as Odiham and Hartley Wintney which all contain features which contribute to overall biodiversity resource. 1.2 The publication of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act in 2006 makes biodiversity an important consideration for all local authorities. Section 40 of this act sets out the duty to conserve biodiversity: “Every public authority must, in exercising its functions, have regard, so far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity”. 1.3 The adoption of the first Hart Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) in 2012 helped translate national and regional targets into local action, whilst also highlighting species and areas of local importance. The first Hart BAP was implemented by the Council’s Biodiversity Officer in partnership with other groups such as the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre (HBIC), Hart Countryside Services, Parish Councils, friends of groups and other council departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Odiham and North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2032
    Odiham and North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2032 Final Strategic Environmental Assessment Report Published by Odiham Parish Council for consultation in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42 July 2016 Non Technical Summary 1. The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of any significant environmental effects of the policies and proposals of the Submission version of the Odiham & North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42 on strategic environmental assessment (SEA). The Neighbourhood Plan has been submitted by Odiham Parish Council to Hart District Council for its independent examination. The District Council has issued a screening opinion requiring an SEA of the Neighbourhood Plan under the Environmental Assessment of Plans & Programmes Regulations 2004. 2. The Final SEA report therefore provides an assessment of the Neighbourhood Plan in a way that is proportionate to this task and that recognises the limitations of the available data and means of measuring direct impacts. 3. The Neighbourhood Plan contains a number of policies for the use and development of land in the Parish in the plan period up to 2032. These policies, together with the policies of the development plan - that is the Hart District Local Plan(Replacement) 1996- 2006 and First Alterations -Saved Policies will be used by the District Council to help determine planning applications once the Neighbourhood Plan is made. The District Council is preparing a new Local Plan but the Neighbourhood Plan will be examined before the adoption of that Plan. In which case, the Neighbourhood Plan is being prepared to be in general conformity with the strategic policies of the adopted Local Plan but is being informed by the reasoning and evidence base of the emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Study 2016
    Hart Open Space Study Pepared by LUC October 2016 Project title: Hart open space study Client: Hart District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 5.0 14/10/16 Revised Final Report Matthew Matthew Philip Smith Parkhill Parkhill Hart Open Space Study 20151218 Last saved: 07/06/2016 16:20 Hart Open Space Study Prepared by LUC June 2016 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Introduction 1 Scope and objectives for the study and strategy 1 2 Approach to the study 2 Approach to the assessment of open space provision in Hart 2 3 Policy and strategic context 6 National planning policy context 6 Regional planning policy 6 Local planning policy context 9 4 Local Needs Assessment 12 Local Authority Profile 12 Key findings from open space consultation 15 5 Existing open space provision 34 Management and Ownership 35 Classification by Type 38 6 Developing a hierarchy 41 A. Parks and Gardens 42 B. Natural and Semi-natural Greenspace 44 C. Green Corridors 46 D. Amenity Greenspace 47 E. Allotments 48 F. Cemeteries and Churchyards 49 G. Provision for Children and Young People 50 H. Roadside Verges 52 I. Outdoor Sports Facilities 52 J. Civic Space 52 7 Setting future provision standards 53 Accessibility standard 53 Quantity standards for open space provision 58 Quality and value standards for open space provision 62 8 Applying the standards 66 A.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH WARNBOROUGH Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals MARCH 2009
    NORTH WARNBOROUGH Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals MARCH 2009 Prepared by The Conservation Studio 1 Querns Lane, Cirencester, GLOS, GL7 1RL Tel: 01285 642428 Fax: 01285 642488 Email: [email protected] www.theconservationstudio.co.uk Contents THE CHARACTER APPRAISAL 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The North Warnborough Conservation area 1 1.2 Summary of key characteristics and recommendations 1 1.3 The planning policy context 3 1.4 The local policy framework 3 1.5 Article 4 Directions 4 1.6 Community involvement 4 2 Location and landscape setting 5 2.1 Location and activities 5 2.2 Topography and geology 5 2.3 Relationship of the conservation area to its surroundings 6 2.4 Biodiversity 6 3 Historic development and archaeology 9 3.1 Historic development 9 3.2 Archaeology 12 4 Spatial analysis 13 4.1 Layout and street pattern 13 4.2 Open spaces, trees and landscape 13 4.3 Focal points, focal buildings, views and vistas 14 4.4 Boundaries 16 4.5 Public realm 16 5 The buildings of the conservation area 17 5.1 Building types 17 5.2 Listed buildings 17 5.3 Locally listed buildings 18 5.4 Positive buildings 19 5.5 Architectural styles, materials and detailing 20 6 Character Areas 21 7 Issues 25 7.1 Summary of Issues 25 7.2 The quality of new development 25 7.3 Traffi c management and car parking 25 7.4 Article 4 Direction and the control of unlisted buildings 25 7.5 Front boundary treatments 25 7.6 Trees and landscape 25 7.7 Overhead wires and telegraph poles 25 7.8 Conservation area boundary review 25 North Warnborough
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting
    minutes of the Parish CounCil meeting Date Monday 10th September 2018 Commencing 7.40pm Venue Clubroom Present: Councillors June James (Chairman) John Ashworth, Paul Gaskell, Pauline Hedges, Gareth Wilson; Clerk Susan Turner; Guest PC Reid. 1 WelCome 2 DeClarations of interest None 3 PC reiD rePort 3.1 Crime Prevention evening Organised by PC Reid at Mapledurwell & Up Nately Village Hall – including Trading Standards – a very good evening. Attended by Pauline Hedges. To consider a similar evening for the residents of WaterEnd Park hosted in the Y-Knot. Visits from Trading Standards to WaterEnd Park residents suggested, also involve Blue Lamp Trust. 3.2 items since last meeting Newnham 12.07 Three people seen with balaclavas – AIO 13.07 Theft of caravan 19.07 Suspected theft of plant machinery 03.08 Damage road traffic incident – mirrors 03.08 Sudden death at Rowan Lodge. Nately Scures 13.07 Cyclist A30 hit by car wing mirror 27.07 Abandoned 999 call – children playing 31.07 Cows loose on the Baredown 09.08 Traffic cones moved during roadworks 12.08 Traffic lights out A30 10.09 Damage road accident Blackstocks Lane – car in ditch. 3.3 Crime Newnham Non-dwelling burglary II. Criminal Damage III Theft I Nately Scures Vehicle crime I Hotel V Assault III Theft from Motor Vehicle I Theft I Drugs I. PC Reid noted the caravan was found at Gerards Cross. Not passed any cameras so locations of these are know. Tracking devises are excellent. Show time, route, location. 4 minutes of PreVious meeting of Monday 9th July agreed and signed.
    [Show full text]
  • Odiham and North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2032
    ODIHAM AND NORTH WARNBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2014 - 2032 CONSULTATION STATEMENT Published by Odiham Parish Council for consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations July 2016 1 ODIHAM AND NORTH WARNBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN: CONSULTATION STATEMENT JULY 2016 CONTENTS Page 1. Compliance with Regulation 15 3 2. Background to consultation 4 Housing Sites’ Survey 2012 4 InOdiham Open Day 5 Preparations towards a neighbourhood development plan 5 Professional guidance 6 Hart Local Plan 6 3. Aims of engagement and consultation 7 4. Overview of engagement and consultation methods 8 Information sharing and consultation methods 9 Summary log of consultation activity 11 Consulting widely 11 Harder-to-reach groups 11 Providing feedback throughout the process 12 5. Developing and testing the options 12 (non-statutory consultation) Raising awareness and understanding the issues 12 Consultation one: scoping policy content (Jan 2015) 13 Consultation two: testing draft policy proposals (May 2015) 15 6. Pre-Submission Consultation (Regulation 14) 16 7. Conclusion 18 Appendices to the Consultation Statement Appendix 1: Summary Log of Engagement and Consultation Activity 19 Appendix 2: Consultation Evidence File references 30 Appendix 3: Consultation letter to Statutory Bodies (Reg 14) 31 Appendix 4: List of all Consultees 33 Appendix 5: Summary log of Pre-Submission Representations 39 (Regulation 14 Consultation) Appendix 6: rCOH Pre-Submission (Regulation 14) Report 159 Appendix 7: NPSG Pre-Submission (Regulation 14) Report 166 2 ODIHAM AND NORTH WARNBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN: CONSULTATION STATEMENT JULY 2016 1. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION 15 (Neighbourhood Plan Regulations 2012) 1.1 Odiham Parish Council submits its Neighbourhood Plan for Odiham and North Warnborough (NP) to Hart District Council in July 2016 for independent examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Hook to Winchfield Walk
    Saturday Walkers Club www.walkingclub.org.uk Hook to Winchfield walk The River Whitewater and some rural stretches of the Basingstoke Canal, passing the ruins of a medieval castle and visiting an attractive Hampshire town. Length Main Walk: 20 km (12.4 miles). Four hours 30 minutes walking time. For the whole excursion including trains, sights and meals, allow at least 9½ hours. Short Walk, omitting Dogmersfield Park: 16¼ km (10.1 miles). Three hours 35 minutes walking time. Long Walk, extended via Dogmersfield: 24¼ km (15.1 miles). Five hours 30 minutes walking time. Circular Walk, starting from Winchfield: 13¾ km (8.5 miles). Three hours walking time. OS Map Explorer 144. Hook, map reference SU725540, is in Hampshire, 9 km E of Basingstoke. Toughness 3 out of 10 (4 for the Long Walk, 2 for the shorter walks). Features The start of this walk is affected by Hook's proximity to the noisy M3, but after crossing it on the edge of Bartley Heath nature reserve the motorway is soon out of earshot. The walk then alternates between stretches alongside the River Whitewater and the Basingstoke Canal, with the weatherbeaten ruins of Odiham Castle at their intersection. After passing through the attractive village of Greywell with its ancient church and mill the route doubles back to a lunchtime stop in the elegant town of Odiham, with its wide Georgian-fronted High Street. https://www.walkingclub.org.uk/walk/hook-to-winchfield/ 1/12 In the afternoon the walk rejoins the canal at Odiham Wharf and continues along the towpath to Broad Oak Bridge, where there is a choice of routes (see Walk Options below).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Desk Study Results
    APPENDIX A Desk Study Results Odiham Deer Park/Ecological Appraisal/703.13/SD/June 2020 Internationally Designated Areas - 10km Legend Ramsar Sites (England) Special Areas of Conservation (England) Special Protection Areas (England) 0 1.5 3 km Projection = OSGB36 xmin = 441200 0 2.5 5 ymin = 136200 xmax = 505500 km ymax = 167700 Map produced by MAGIC on 22 February, 2019. Copyright resides with the data suppliers and the map must not be reproduced without their permission. Some information in MAGIC is a snapshot of the information (c) Crown Copyright and database rights 2019. Ordnance Survey 100022861. that is being maintained or continually updated by the originating organisation. Please refer to the metadata for details as information may be illustrative or representative rather than definitive at this stage. Nationally Designated Areas - 5km Legend Local Nature Reserves (England) National Nature Reserves (England) Sites of Special Scientific Interest (England) 0 0.6 1.2 km Projection = OSGB36 xmin = 462100 0 0.9 5 1.9 ymin = 145800 xmax = 486600 km ymax = 157800 Map produced by MAGIC on 22 February, 2019. Copyright resides with the data suppliers and the map must not be reproduced without their permission. Some information in MAGIC is a snapshot of the information (c) Crown Copyright and database rights 2019. Ordnance Survey 100022861. that is being maintained or continually updated by the originating organisation. Please refer to the metadata for details as information may be illustrative or representative rather than definitive at this stage. Ancient Woodland - 2km Legend Ancient Woodland (England) Ancient and Semi-Natural Woodland Ancient Replanted Woodland 0 0.25 0.5 km Projection = OSGB36 xmin = 468600 0 0.4 0.8 ymin = 149000 xmax = 479200 km ymax = 154300 Map produced by MAGIC on 27 February, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Odiham and North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2032
    ODIHAM AND NORTH WARNBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2014 - 2032 Adopted June 2017 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 4 -14 2. VISION AND OBJECTIVES 15 -17 3. LAND USE PLANNING POLICIES 18 - 59 4. AIMS AND PROPOSALS 60 – 62 5. POLICIES MAP (with insets) 63 – 65 APPENDIX 1: 66 - 68 Schedule of Evidence APPENDIX 2: 69 - 80 Parish Profile INDEX OF POLICIES Policy number Page number Policy 1 - Spatial Plan for Parish 19 Policy 2 - Housing Development Sites 22 Policy 3 – Local Gap 35 Policy 4 - Housing Mix 37 Policy 5 – General Design Principles 38 Policy 6 – Odiham Conservation Area 39 Policy 7 – North Warnborough Conservation Area 43 Policy 8 – Basingstoke Canal Conservation Area 46 Policy 9 - Odiham High Street 49 Policy 10 – Education 51 Policy 11 – Local Green Spaces 52 Policy 12 – Natural Environment 54 Policy 13 – Assets of Community Value 57 Policy 14 – Dunleys Hill Open Space 58 ODIHAM AND NORTH WARNBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN ADOPTED JUNE 2017 2 FOREWORD As the Chairman of Odiham Parish Council, it is my honour and pleasure to present you with a copy of this Neighbourhood Plan that covers Odiham, North Warnborough and RAF Odiham. The Neighbourhood Plan stems from the Government’s determination to provide the opportunity for local communities to become closely involved in the decisions which affect them. In the formal process of developing a Neighbourhood Plan that must be followed, the Parish Council has to bring the Neighbourhood Plan to the attention of the people who live, work or carry on business within the Parish as well as any qualifying body that might be affected by the proposed Neighbourhood Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Strategy the Loddon Catchment
    Biodiversity Strategy The Loddon catchment Biodiversity Strategy: The Loddon catchment 2003 Protecting Wildlife for the Future Cover photograph: Foxlease and Ancells Meadow SSSI Acknowledgements Courtesy of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust This strategy has been produced by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust with funding from Dormouse by Phil McLean the Environment Agency. Support and advice was Adder by Phil McLean provided by the Loddon catchment Biodiversity Silver Studded Blue by David Purslow Strategy Steering Group, comprising the following Lapwing by Dennis Garratt organisations: ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Surrey Wildlife Trust Data for the strategy was provided by: ! Hampshire County Council ! Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Surrey Wildlife Trust ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Hampshire Ornithological Society ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust This data has been analysed for the purposes of this project but remains the copyright of the data providers. Maps within the strategy have been produced by Naomi Ewald and remain the copyright of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust and the Environment Agency. Written by: Naomi Ewald, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Published by: Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Beechcroft House, Vicarage Lane, Curdridge, Hampshire, SO32 2DP. Company limited by guarantee and registered in England, no. 676313. Registered charity no. 201081. Maps have been reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives Index
    Commons, Greens and Allotments Archives Index DEFRA, HLRO and The National Archives February 2007 Contents Introductory Note Introductory Note .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Website Details .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Main Index Contents of Main Index ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 County Listings ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 General References Royal
    [Show full text]