Do Exposures to Aerosols Pose a Risk to Dental Professionals?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Occupational Medicine 2018;68:454–458 Advance Access publication 20 June 2018 doi:10.1093/occmed/kqy095 Do exposures to aerosols pose a risk to dental professionals? J. Kobza1, J. S. Pastuszka2,3 and E. Brągoszewska2 1Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, School of Public Health in Bytom, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland, 2Silesian University of Technology, Chair of Air Protection, Centre of New Technologies, 22B Konarskiego St, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland, 3Institute of Occupational Medicine & Environmental Health, 13 Koscielna St, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. Correspondence to: J. Kobza, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, School of Public Health in Bytom, Piekarska 18, 41-902 Bytom, Poland. Tel: +48 601389984; e-mail: [email protected] Background Dental care professionals are exposed to aerosols from the oral cavity of patients containing several pathogenic microorganisms. Bioaerosols generated during dental treatment are a potential hazard to dental staff, and there have been growing concerns about their role in transmission of various airborne infections and about reducing the risk of contamination. Aims To investigate qualitatively and quantitatively the bacterial and fungal aerosols before and during clinical sessions in two dental offices compared with controls. Methods An extra-oral evacuator system was used to measure bacterial and fungal aerosols. Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of bacterial species and fungal strains was performed and strains of bacteria and fungi were identified based on their metabolic properties using biochemical tests. Results Thirty-three bioaerosol samples were obtained. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation showed that during treatment, there is a significant increase in airborne concentration of bacteria and fungi. The microflora included mainly gram-positive organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp.), gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria and those creating endospores as well as non-porous bac- teria and mould fungi (Cladosporium and Penicillium). Conclusions Exposure to the microorganisms identified is not a significant occupational hazard for dental care professionals; however, evidence-based prevention measures are recommended. Key words Bioaerosols; dental care professionals; health risk; indoor control; occupational hazard. Introduction Other research suggests that it may be up to 4.3 E + 05 bacteria/m3 [4], generated during dental procedures. The Oral surgery is performed using a variety of hand tools small diameter of the aerosol particles (<1 micron) rep- including high-speed dental turbines, micro-motor resents a potentially high risk of inhalation of aerosolized hand pieces, ultrasonic scalers and air–water syringes. bacteria [3]. These produce a large amount of particles and splatter- The mean level of bioaerosols depends on the ing and may contain microorganisms from the oral cav- procedures; higher levels were observed for cavity prep- ity of patients. It has been suggested that these aerosols aration (24–105 CFU/m3) and for ultrasonic scaling contain bacteria and fungi, which may be a risk factor 3 for cross-infection for dental professionals. Bioaerosol (42–71 CFU/m ), and lower levels were reported for 3 compositions are heterogeneous [1]; they contain blood, extraction (9–66 CFU/m ) and for oral examination 3 microorganisms, mucosal cells, restorative materials, (24–62 CFU/m ) [5]. However, most research con- tooth particles and large quantities of saliva. Pathogenic cluded that bioaerosols return to baseline 2 h after the microorganisms and microbes from patients’ airways dental treatment [3]. may contaminate nearby surfaces and lead to a risk of The predominant microorganisms isolated from infectious agent transmission-associated diseases such as bioaerosols in dental clinics are Staphylococcus and influenza, tuberculosis, meningitis or severe acute res- Micrococcus species [5,6]. The higher concentration of piratory syndromes [2]. anti-Legionella antibodies reported in dental staff com- Some research indicates that dental professionals pared with the general population provides evidence are exposed to up to 1.86 E + 05 bacteria/m3 of air [3]. that water in dental unit waterlines may be a potential © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] J. KOBZA ET AL.: RISK OF AEROSOL EXPOSURE TO DENTAL PROFESSIONALS 455 reservoir for infection [7]. However, it has been reported Table 2. Qualitative characteristic of bacteria and fungi aerosols that sensitization and infectious hazards related to poten- in dental office no. 1 and outdoor air (control), before and during tial long-term exposure to Legionella spp. and non-tuber- treatment culous mycobacteria are minimal [4,8]. Some studies The microflora of air in Bacterial and fungal showed a low prevalence of carriers of methicillin-resist- a dental surgery contamination levels ant Staphylococcus aureus among dental patients [9]. In the present study, we measured the concentration A. Outdoor air of bacteria and fungi in aerosols, in rooms where oral Bacteria microflora % of total bacteria surgery was performed using high-speed instruments. Gram-positive granulomata 53 The aim of the study was to analyse the number of Staphylococcus xylosus 25 colony-forming units (CFUs) in bioaerosols and assess Micrococcus spp. 15 Staphylococcus lentus 10 whether exposure limits are exceeded. Kocuria rosea 3 Gram-positive rod-shaped 43 non-porous bacteria Methods Brevibacterium spp. 28 Bacterial and fungal aerosols generated during clinical Corynebacterium striatum 15 Gram-positive rod-shaped 3 work in two dental offices (a one-chair clinic and a multi- bacteria creating endospores chair clinic) were quantitatively and qualitatively ana- Bacillus pumilus 3 lysed. An extra-oral evacuator system was used. A special Fungal microflora % of total fungi filter was placed on the nozzle of the evacuator and air Mould fungi 100 was collected at distances of 30–60 cm from the surgical Cladosporium cladosporioides 39 site to measure total bioaerosol content in dentist’s, den- Cladosporium herbarum 33 tal hygienist’s and patients’ breathing zones. Penicillium griseoazureum 11 Inhalable dust samples were collected in the breath- Penicillium spp. 11 Fusarium spp. 6 ing zone of dental practitioners. Control air samples B. Before patients visit were taken outside the dental practice before and during Bacteria microflora % of total bacteria the working day. Ethical approval was not required for Gram-positive granulomata 100 this study. Staphylococcus epidermidis 52 The identification of isolated bacteria species, based Micrococcus spp. 33 on morphological analysis, was performed. For the Streptococcus spp. 11 macroscopic analysis of colonies, Tryptic Soy Agar was Staphylococcus xylosus 2 used, with cycloheximide added to inhibit fungal growth. Staphylococcus sciuri 2 Fungal microflora % of total fungi Microscopic analysis of collected bacteria was based on Mould fungi 100 Gram strain preparations and provided data on cell size Cladosporium cladosporioides 61 and shape, orientation to each cell and the appearance of Cladosporium herbarum 32 Penicillium griseoazureum 7 C. During patients visit Table 1. The concentration of bacteria and fungi in aerosols in Bacteria microflora % of total bacteria dental offices before and during patients visits Gram-positive granulomata 99 Staphylococcus epidermidis 45 Collected measurements Concentration of Micrococcus spp. 38 microorganisms (CFU/m3) Streptococcus spp. 6 Staphylococcus xylosus 5 Bacteria Fungi Staphylococcus equorum 3 Kocuria rosea 2 Mezophile ray fungi 0 A. Dental office no. 1 (multi-chair) Rhodococcus spp. 0 Outdoor air 260 190 Fungal microflora % of total fungi Dental office before 270 130 Mould fungi 100 patients visit Cladosporium cladosporioides 38 Dental office during 430 (360–500) 300 (0–330) Cladosporium herbarum 31 patients visit Penicillium spp. 15 B. Dental office no. 2 (single chair) Penicillium griseoazureum 15 Outdoor air 150 30 Dentist office before 180 60 patients visit spores. Bacteria were characterized in terms of their met- Dentist office during 490 (200–1190) 110 (40–220) patients visit abolic characteristics using the biochemical tests, API (Analytical Profile Index). Their analysis was supported 456 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Table 3. Qualitative characteristic of bacteria and fungi aerosols Table 3. Continued in dental office no. 2 and outdoor air (control), before and during Gram-negative rod-shaped 2 treatment bacteria Brevundimonas vesicularis 2 The microflora of air Bacterial and fungal Fungal microflora % of total fungi in a dental surgery contamination levels Mould fungi 100 Cladosporium cladosporioides 54 A. Outdoor air Penicillium verrucosum 27 Bacteria microflora % of total bacteria Penicillium spp. 9 Gram-positive granulomata 57 Acremonium spp. 9 Micrococcus spp. 33 Staphylococcus sciuri 12 Staphylococcus xylosus 9 Kocuria rosea 3 using the application APIweb (bioMérieux, Marcy- Gram-positive rod-shaped 15 l’Etoile, France). Bacteria were grouped as Gram- non-porous bacteria positive cocci, Gram-positive rods that form endospores,