DOCSLIB.ORG

WP 147 Natter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WP 147 Natter UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Autocratic immigration policymaking The illiberal paradox hypothesis Natter, K. Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Natter, K. (2018). Autocratic immigration policymaking: The illiberal paradox hypothesis. (IMIn Working Papers; No. 147), (MADE project paper ; No. 4). International Migration Institute Network. https://www.migrationinstitute.org/publications/autocratic-immigration-policymaking- the-illiberal-paradox-hypothesis General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 Working Papers Paper 147, November 2018 Autocratic immigration policymaking: The illiberal paradox hypothesis Katharina Natter MADE project paper 4 This paper is published by the International Migration Institute Network (IMIn). IMIn does not have an institutional view and does not aim to present one. The views expressed in this document are those of its independent author. its independent authors. The IMIn Working Papers Series The IMIn working paper series presents current research in the field of international migration. The series was initiated by the International Migration Institute (IMI) since its foundation at the University in Oxford in 2006, and has been continued since 2017 by the International Migration Institute network (IMIn).The papers in this series (1) analyse migration as part of broader global change, (2) contribute to new theoretical approaches, and (3) advance understanding of the multi-level forces driving migration and experiences of migration. Abstract Open immigration policy changes are often cast as a feature of democracy and restrictive immigration policy changes as a feature of autocracy. This paper shows that the relationship between political regime type and immigration policy change is not as clear cut. Empirical evidence suggests that the substance of immigration policy change — in terms of openness or restrictiveness — does not significantly differ between democracies and autocracies. However, political regimes shape immigration policy dynamics, with autocracies having more leeway than democracies to open (or restrict) immigration according to their economic, geopolitical, or domestic priorities. Autocracies can more easily enact open immigration policy reforms compared to democracies if they wish to do so, a dynamic I call the ‘illiberal paradox’ and illustrate with empirical examples from across the globe. I also outline the limits of the autocratic openings on immigration, related to policy implementation, sudden policy backlashes and migrants’ integration rights. To move towards more global immigration policy theories, this paper suggests combining analyses that identify ideal types of democratic or autocratic immigration policymaking with studies of the nuances of real-life political practices. This would allow scholars to conceptualise immigration policy dynamics across the entire democracy- autocracy spectrum, for instance by capturing authoritarian practices within formal democracies and democratic practices within formal autocracies. Keywords: immigration policy, policymaking, political regimes, political practices, democracy, autocracy Author: Katharina Natter, Sociology Department, University of Amsterdam, [email protected] Funding: the research leading to these results is part of the MADE (Migration as Development) Consolidator Grant project and has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020/2015‐2020)/ERC Grant. IMIn Working Papers Series 2018, No. 147 2 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Defining key concepts ......................................... 5 1.2 Outlining the argument ........................................ 6 2 The substance of immigration policy change ........................................................................... 7 2.1 Declared immigration policy objectives ........................ 7 2.2 Enacted migration policy changes ............................. 10 3 The dynamics of immigration policy change .......................................................................... 13 3.1 The liberal paradox .......................................... 13 3.2 The illiberal paradox ........................................ 15 3.3 Empirical illustrations ...................................... 17 4 Concluding thoughts: Where to go next? .............................................................................. 20 4.1 Integrating analyses of political practices and ideal-typical regime dynamics .............................................. 20 4.2 Towards a global theorization of immigration policymaking .... 22 References ................................................................................................................................. 24 IMIn Working Papers Series 2018, No. 147 3 1 Introduction Immigration policies have received growing attention from academia over the past decades. Today, the literature offers various theories of immigration policymaking. However, their applicability is almost always restricted — explicitly or implicitly — to so-called Western liberal democracies (Boswell, 2007; Castles, 2004a; Freeman, 1995, 2006; Hampshire, 2013; Hollifield, 1992; Joppke, 1998a, 1998b; Meyers, 2000; Sassen, 1996).1 Among the most prominent and widely cited theories features the ‘liberal paradox’. Hollifield (1992) pioneered the term to explain why, despite growing politicization of immigration and popular calls for restrictions, open immigration policies have prevailed across ‘Western liberal-democracies’. He argued that liberal democracies are confronted with contradictory drivers when elaborating their immigration policies. On the one hand, the dominant ideology of economic liberalism pushes (labour) markets to globalise and immigration regimes to open up. On the other hand, the political logic of democratic nation-states is dominated by electoral objectives and national identity concerns and therefore seeks to limit immigration. Complementing this argument, other researchers have pointed to the fact that immigration policies in liberal democracies have a built-in tendency to liberalise because powerful employer lobbies succeed in pushing governments to open immigration (Freeman, 1995). Also, legal constraints, such as constitutional or international norms and their enforcement through national courts, limit the extent to which liberal democracies can restrict immigration (Joppke, 1998a; Sassen, 1996). As a result of these dynamics, discourses about immigration, which respond mainly to national audiences, tend to be more restrictive than policies in practice — policies that also have to integrate the demands of markets and international norms. Immigration policy is therefore often characterised by a ‘discursive gap’ (Boswell, 2007; Joppke, 1998a). By linking the liberal-democratic character of Western states to the open nature of their immigration policies, the literature has suggested a ‘regime effect’: Despite restrictive discourses, democracy is said to align with de-facto open immigration policies. The reverse assumption, namely that autocracies go together with restrictive immigration policies, has received less academic attention. Yet it seems intuitive: If autocratic state curtail their citizens’ socio-political rights, why should they grant them to foreigners? For a long time, studies that examine immigration policymaking in autocracies have been lacking or have remained apart from theoretical discussions. This is partly because autocratic policymaking is assumed to be centralized and devoid of negotiations dynamics — and thus of minor interest to scientific investigation — and partly because scholars have presumed that apart from the wealthy Oil monarchies of the Gulf, few people migrate to autocracies, as these are usually places people leave.2 Therefore, the ‘regime effect’ — linking democracy and open immigration policies — has largely remained at the level of an educated guess. This paper explores the existence of a ‘regime effect’ in immigration policy and in particular the ways in which autocracy shapes states’ immigration policy dynamics. In doing so, it draws on the 1 The term ‘Western liberal democracy’ is rarely (if ever) explicitly defined in the migration literature, which is highly problematic. In fact, authors use the term as a shortcut to set the boundary condition of their theory, applicable to an ‘exclusive club’ of ‘rich, developed’ countries (for a more thorough literature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Brazilian Foreign Policy Towards South America During The
    Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional ISSN: 0034-7329 [email protected] Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasil Gomes Saraiva, Miriam Brazilian foreign policy towards South America during the Lula administration: caught between South America and Mercosur Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 53, diciembre, 2010, pp. 151-168 Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasília, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35817453009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Artigo Brazilian foreign policy towards South America during the Lula Administration: caught between South America and Mercosur Política externa brasileira para a América do Sul durante o governo Lula: entre América do Sul e Mercosul MIRIam GOMES SARAIVA* Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 53 (special edition): 151-168 [2010] Since 1991, Brazil’s foreign policy towards South America has developed along two lines that share some common ground. Brazil’s diplomatic efforts have centred on two movements with regard to its South American neighbours and in the effort to build Brazilian leadership in the region. On the one hand, Brazilian government has developed and consolidated a process of regional integration along the lines of open regionalism: the Common Market of the South, i.e. Mercosur1. Meanwhile, it has also fostered less structured cooperation and integration initiatives in the region.2 The significance of these two movements, the way they have been coordinated and the relative weight given to one or the other have varied from administration to administration as a function of each one’s respective foreign policy strategies, the country’s international standing and the behaviour of its neighbouring States.
    [Show full text]
  • Workers, Soldiers, Activists: Black Mobilization in Brazil and Spanish America, 1800-2000 GEORGE REID a NDREWS University of Pittsburgh
    Workers, Soldiers, Activists: Black Mobilization in Brazil and Spanish America, 1800-2000 GEORGE REID A NDREWS University of Pittsburgh Comparisons of race relations in Brazil and North America (United States) have a long history. As Thomas Skidmore’s classic Black into White made clear, Brazilian writers and intellectuals were already drawing such comparisons by the late 1800s; and Gilberto Freyre’s direct observations of Jim Crow segregation in the United States south provided the implicit backdrop to his seminal portrait of Brazilian race relations in Casa grande e senzala (1933) and Sobrados e mocambos (1936). Meanwhile North American observers, ranging from former President Theodore Roosevelt to African-American writers and journalists, were commenting on patterns of race in Brazil and contrasting those patterns, either implicitly or explicitly, to race relations in the United States. 1 Such comparisons continued into the second half of the 1900s, generating an important body of scholarly literature to which Skidmore has been a major contributor. Beginning in 1972, at the same moment that Carl Degler was win- ning acclaim for his analysis of the “mulatto escape hatch” and his assertion that the “the mulatto was the key” to understanding differences between Brazil and the United States, Skidmore acknowledged the importance of the mulatto racial group but insisted that there was much more to the (comparative) story. In order to understand race in the two countries, he suggested, we have to move beyond race per se to consider multiple historical factors (“contrasting socio- economic contexts,” demography, regional differences within each country, the role of the free black population during slavery) and “ how these factors have fitted together.” 2 [email protected] E.I.A.L., Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Presences Joaquim Nabuco, the Memoirist1
    Presences Joaquim Nabuco, the memoirist1 ALFREDO BOSI To Laura Gouvêa Vieira Gonçalves N THE centenary of Joaquim Nabuco’s death, everything invites us to reread My Formative Years (Minha Formação). It is a book of memories of a lifetime, I although it does not follow the traditional linear structure of works of the genre: birth, childhood, youth, adulthood ... the composition resembles more an archipel- ago than a continent. The chapters are islands that the seemingly infinite sea of the memory sometimes brings closer, and others pushes away. Like in the movements of our subjective life, there are memories so far and frayed that they seem to have already left us, and it takes some effort to recompose them and tell them; and there are others that take us by storm, invade the deepest recesses of our mind, leaving signs, some- times scars in our character and perhaps in our own destiny. Nietzsche was convinced that “experiences last a long time in profound people. “My Formative Years” is an archipelago of these experiences that herme- neutics has taught us to call “Erlebnisse”, life experiences, a term rarely used today, but still essential when one wants to talk about a link between feeling and memory. In other words, the memory of what one has lived. According to the reconstruction of the history of Erlebnis’ concept devel- oped ​​by Gadamer in Truth and Method, the word only entered the philosophi- cal vocabulary from Schleiermacher’s biography written by Dilthey in 1870. Within the meaning of lived experience, the expression denotes something that survives in us individually and persistently.
    [Show full text]
  • White Hegemony in the Land of Carnival
    White Hegemony in the Land of Carnival The (Apparent) Paradox of Racism and Hybridity in Brazil Benito Cao Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics School of History and Politics University of Adelaide October 2008 for Adela ii Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………..… v Declaration …………………………………………………………………………... vi Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………...…… vii Notes on Language and Bibliography ……………………………………………. ix Introduction: Brazil(ianness) ………………………………………………………. 1 The Myth of (Brazilian) Racial Democracy …………………………………...…... 2 The (De)Colonisation of the (Brazilian) Imagination …………………………… 11 (Eurocentric) History and the Writing of (White) Hegemony …………………. 20 The (Re)Invention of the (Brazilian) Nation ……………………………………... 29 Supplements to the Initial Basic Approach ………………………………………. 45 The Indian (Other) …………………………………………………………… 46 The Female (Other) ………………………………………………………….. 46 The Popular (Culture) ……………………………………………………….. 48 (De)Constructing Brazil(ianness) …………………………………………………. 50 Chapter One: Discovery …………………………………………………………... 52 Vision and Power in the Birth Certificate of Brazil ……………………………... 53 Objects and Subjects in the Birth Certificate of Brazil …………………………... 60 Marriage as Metaphor of the Origins of Brazil(ianness) ………………………... 66 (Re)Discovering Brazil: (Re)Visions of the Nation ……………………………… 74 Voyage: Modernity ………………………………………………………….. 75 Encounter: Cordiality ……………………………………………………….. 81 Other (Re)Visions ……………………………………………………………. 85 Conclusion: The First
    [Show full text]
  • EGM/National Machinery/2004/Inf
    EGM/EPWD/2005/EP.12 12 December 2005 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Expert Group Meeting on Equal participation of women and men in decision-making processes, with particular emphasis on political participation and leadership 24 to 27 October 2005 Cross-party alliances around gender agendas: critical mass, critical actors, critical structures, or critical junctures?* Prepared by: Dr Fiona J. Macaulay University of Bradford UK * The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations. Introduction It is self-evident that women in political life will exert more influence on the decision- making processes if they manage to engage in collective action both within their own party- political groupings as well as with those of other persuasions. However, it is not at all self- evident which conditions are most propitious to the formation of such alliances to further progressive gender equity and equality policies. This paper therefore investigates the conditions under which women work across party lines, with both men and women who, under other circumstances, are their electoral competitors. The paper focuses principally on the experience of Latin America, and examines in detail the case of a successful cross-party women’s alliance in Brazil.1 It begins by examining the validity of one of the key arguments of the proponents of gender quotas: that of critical mass. It then proposes that we should perhaps look at more at other ‘critical’ variables, such as the characteristics and strategies of critical actors who have been successful in forging strategic alliances.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism in Brazil · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: https://journaltalk.net/articles/6019 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 17(2) September 2020: 405–441 Liberalism in Brazil Lucas Berlanza1 LINK TO ABSTRACT Brazil is the largest country in South America and the fifth-largest in the world by area, sixth by population. It is noted for its soccer and popular celebrations. It is also known for its undeniable problems. And it is one of the most closed and regulated economies on the planet. The Economic Freedom Index published by the Fraser Institute rates 162 countries for the year 2017. In that listing, Brazil comes in 120th place (Gwartney et al. 2019, 9). Brazil was under Portugal’s power for centuries, becoming a united kingdom under a traditional monarchy in 1815. It became a constitutional monarchy after its independence in 1822; a republic controlled by oligarchies after a coup d’état in 1889; a dictatorship in the 1930s; it tried to maintain a constitutional democracy between 1946 and 1964; and it was a military regime between 1964 and 1985. Then the current democratic period began, called the New Republic. Regardless of the period, the same kinds of challenges were experienced, varying only by degree. Economic problems like inflation, public debt, and excessive regulation are a constant in Brazilian history, appearing in all of its historical periods and political regimes. Brazilian intellectuals have blamed Brazil’s troubles on several cultural char- acteristics. One of them is the prevalence of patrimonialism, a system “in which the leader organizes his political power as the exercise of his domestic management” (Medard 1991, 326).2 Brazil’s history is marked by many military coups, dictatorial cycles, and chronic economic statism.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economies
    Fabio Fossati Political economies [email protected] Universidad de Trieste and decision-making processes in Latin America Italy Politiche economiche e processi decisionali nellAmerica Latina Recibido: 10/10/ 2020 Aceptado: 09/11/2020 Abstract In this article, political economies have been linked to the decision-making processes of Latin American countries, before and after 1989. Conservative and liberal reforms have usually been applied through neo-oligarchic decision-making processes. Social-dem- ocrat economic policies have often been implemented with neo-corporatism. When “soft” populism prevailed, partitocrazia was the typical political instrument of lef tist gov- ernments, either if they governed or if they were at the opposition. Thus, they usual ly ve- toed rightist presidents’ market reforms. The political consequence of “hard” populism has been authoritarianism, like in Venezuela with Chavez and Maduro. In “hybrid” eco- nomic policies, combining different models of political economies, there is not a stable decision-making process, and political conflict is usually strong. Keywords Political Economy, Decision-Making Process, Populism, Technocracies, Party Government. Riassunto In questo articolo, le politiche economiche sono state collegate ai processi decisionali dei paesi dell’America latina. Le riforme conservatrici e liberali sono state di solito appli- cate con processi decisionali neo-oligarchici. Le politiche economiche social-democra- tiche sono state attuate grazie al neo-corporativismo. Quando il populismo moderato ha prevalso, la partitocrazia è stato il tipico strumento politico dei governi di sinistra: sia al governo che all’opposizione (nel secondo caso scattava il veto verso presidenti filo liberisti). La conseguenza politica del populismo radicale è stato l’autoritarismo (vedi il Venezuela di Chavez e Maduro).
    [Show full text]
  • Confrontation Cinema in the Age of Neoliberalism; Where Brazil and the United States Meet Rachel F
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2008 Confrontation Cinema in the Age of Neoliberalism; Where Brazil and the United States Meet Rachel F. Rosenfeld Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Rosenfeld, Rachel F., "Confrontation Cinema in the Age of Neoliberalism; Where Brazil and the United States Meet" (2008). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 222. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/222 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE CONFRONTATION CINEMA IN THE AGE OF NEOLIBERALISM; WHERE BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES MEET SUBMITTED TO SALVADOR VELAZCO AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY RACHEL FAYE ROSENFELD FOR SENIOR THESIS Academic Year 2007-2008 28 APRIL 2008 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all of the individuals who have helped to shape this International Relations Honors Thesis. It is an immense work, and I could not have done it without your help. Much thanks to Professor Velazco for his patience and kindness with my many drafts and changes in film choice. I came to him only knowing that I loved Brazilian film and studied politics; from this he has introduced me to an inspiring and remarkable myriad of films and artists. His immense knowledge of and love for film has been extremely valuable and without his guidance, I would never have found such significant sources in my research nor understood their full importance. I would also like to thank Professor Haley, my dedicated advisor, without whom I would never have found Professor Velazco nor my love for Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Liberalism in Brazil of the 19Th Century O
    The “place” of liberalism in Brazil of the 19th century THE “PLACE” OF LIBERALISM IN BRAZIL OF THE 19TH CENTURY O “LUGAR” DO LIBERALISMO NO BRASIL DO SÉCULO XIX EL "LUGAR" DEL LIBERALISMO EN EL BRASIL DEL SIGLO XIX Lucas Flôres VASQUES1 ABSTRACT: The “place” of liberalism in Brazil of the 19th century had been the subject of major debates in the Social Sciences. Thus, we aim to map this debate and provide a summary of these positions. To do this, we will first make a return to the context of the emergence of liberalism in England, then we will advance to its philosophical principles in John Locke. Then, we will demonstrate how these philosophical principles were interpreted in Brazil in three positions: First as an “idea out of place” (SCHWARZ, 2000; NOGUEIRA, 1976), second as “an idea tends to find its place” (COUTINHO, 2000) and third as an “idea that is in its right place” (FRANCO, 1976; BOSI, 2010). KEYWORDS: Liberalism. Political philosophy. Freedom. 19th century. RESUMO: O “lugar” do liberalismo no Brasil do século XIX é alvo de grandes debates na filosofia política (RICUPERO, 2007). Assim, temos como objetivo mapear esse debate e fornecer uma síntese dessas posições. Para isso, faremos, primeiro, um retorno ao contexto de surgimento do liberalismo na Inglaterra e, posteriormente, avançaremos para seus princípios filosóficos em John Locke. Em seguida, demonstraremos como esses princípios filosóficos foram interpretados no Brasil em três posições: primeiro como “ideia fora do lugar” (SCHWARZ, 2000; NOGUEIRA, 1976), segundo como “uma ideia tende a encontrar seu lugar” (COUTINHO, 2000) e terceiro como uma “ideia que está em seu devido lugar” (FRANCO, 1976; BOSI, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Globalization and Democratization in Brazil An
    Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais ISSN: 1519-6089 [email protected] Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Brasil Oliveira, Nythamar de Globalization and democratization in Brazil an interpretation... Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, vol. 4, núm. 1, janeiro-junho, 2004, pp. 39-55 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=74240104 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Globalization and democratization in Brazil an interpretation of Rawls's political liberalism Nythamar de Oliveira * As it was bluntly stated on the homepage of the Carnegie Council Program on Justice and Global Economy, “[g]lobalization has become a buzzword for the overarching economic, political, social, and cultural trends of the late twentieth century. Considered from the perspective of social and economic justice, however, globalization has had a mixed record of success, at best.” 1 The mixed blessings of globalization came under attack on several occasions such as the latest international summits in Europe and the Americas, and three editions of the World Social Forum, held at Porto Alegre, Brazil, at the ____________ * A first draft of this paper was read at the Philosophisches Forum of the Universität Kassel, in a seminar organized by Prof. Hans-Georg Flickinger in February 2003 and supported by the CAPES- DAAD exchange program on “Social Movements and the Struggle for Citizenship Rights: A Comparison between Brazil and Germany.” 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enigma of Liberalism in Imperial Brazil, 1822 to 1889
    The Enigma of Liberalism in Imperial Brazil, 1822 to 1889 Roderick J. Barman Professor Emeritus, Department of History University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC Canada1 On December 31, 1861, after some twenty years as ruler, Pedro II, Emperor of Brazil, began a new diary. The opening entry, an exercise in self-explanation, contained the passage: “I have sworn the Constitution and, even if I had not sworn it, it would be for me a second religion”.2 This quotation by Pedro II goes far to explain why I entitled this presentation “The Enigma of Liberalism in Imperial Brazil, 1822-1889”. This talk has four parts. It first considers those attributes of the ideology of Liberalism which constituted its greatest strengths and its principal weaknesses. The second part discusses, in the context of those aspects, the rise of Liberalism in Brazil. It analyzes, thirdly, the complex relationship of Liberalism and Monarchy in Brazil during the thirty years after Pedro II’s majority in 1840 and, finally, it identifies the factors that caused the parallel decline and fall of Liberalism and Monarchy from 1870 to 1889. The North American saying, “you can’t nail Jell-O – that is jelly – to the wall”, seems appropriate to any attempt to analyze Liberalism of the nineteenth century, the protean nature of which gave it a very diverse appeal and meaning. Despite these obstacles, I want to suggest that 1 I would like to thank Dr. Deborah Toner for inviting me to give a presentation on February 10, 2012 as part of the ISA series on “Liberalism in the Americas”.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Nationalism and Energy Integration in Latin America: the Ap Radox of Populism Brian Hollingsworth [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 6-20-2018 Resource Nationalism and Energy Integration in Latin America: The aP radox of Populism Brian Hollingsworth [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC006843 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Economics Commons, International Relations Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Political Economy Commons, and the Regional Economics Commons Recommended Citation Hollingsworth, Brian, "Resource Nationalism and Energy Integration in Latin America: The aP radox of Populism" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3790. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3790 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida RESOURCE NATIONALISM AND ENERGY INTEGRATION IN LATIN AMERICA: THE PARADOX OF POPULISM A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Brian Edward Hollingsworth 2018 To: Dean John F. Stack, Jr. Steven J. Green School of International and Public Affairs This dissertation, written by Brian Edward Hollingsworth, and entitled Resource Nationalism and Energy Integration in Latin America: The Paradox of Populism, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgement. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved.
    [Show full text]