DOCSLIB.ORG

Affected Environment Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Affected Environment Technical Report IH 35 PEL Study Affected Environment Technical Report Prepared by: Texas Department of Transportation Alamo Regional Mobility Authority May 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Environmental Setting .......................................................................................... 1 2. Land Use and Planning ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Existing Conditions and Local Government Plans and Policies ..................................................... 2 2.2.1 Existing Land Uses Specific to the Study Area .............................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Local Government Plans and Policies ........................................................................................... 4 3. Socioeconomic Factors including Population, Minority Population, and Employment ................... 6 3.1 Legal and Regulatory Context ....................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Environmental Justice ................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Limited English Proficiency ........................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 9 3.3.1 Population ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3.2 Environmental Justice Populations ............................................................................................. 10 3.3.3 Limited English Proficiency Populations ..................................................................................... 12 3.3.4 Economic Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 12 4. Neighborhoods and Community Resources ................................................................................... 15 4.1 Military Land ............................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Hospitals ...................................................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Schools and Universities ............................................................................................................. 16 4.4 Places of Worship ........................................................................................................................ 17 5. Visual and Aesthetic Qualities......................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Legal and Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 20 6. Existing Transportation Infrastructure ............................................................................................ 21 6.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Roadway System ......................................................................................................................... 21 6.2.1 Existing IH 35 and IH 410 Facility Characteristics........................................................................ 21 6.2.2 Other Major Roadway Facilities in the Study Area ..................................................................... 22 IH 35 PEL Study Affected Environment Technical Report Page i 6.2.3 Facility Crossings and Entrance/Exit Ramps ............................................................................... 22 6.2.4 Major Traffic Generators ............................................................................................................ 24 6.2.5 Operational Characteristics......................................................................................................... 25 6.2.6 Future Planned Improvements ................................................................................................... 27 6.3 Rail System .................................................................................................................................. 30 6.3.1 Freight Rail System ...................................................................................................................... 30 6.3.2 At-Grade Rail Crossings ............................................................................................................... 31 6.3.3 Passenger Rail System ................................................................................................................. 32 6.4 Transit System ............................................................................................................................. 35 6.4.1 Transit Service ............................................................................................................................. 35 6.4.2 Transit Ridership ......................................................................................................................... 36 6.5 Intermodal Facilities .................................................................................................................... 38 6.5.1 Existing Intermodal Facilities .................................................................................................. 38 6.6 Air Facilities ................................................................................................................................. 39 7. Surface Water ................................................................................................................................. 40 7.1 Legal and Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................... 40 7.1.1 Federal Requirements of the Clean Water Act ........................................................................... 40 7.1.2 State Water Quality Regulations ................................................................................................. 41 7.1.3 Floodplain Regulations ................................................................................................................ 41 7.1.4 Wetlands Regulations ................................................................................................................. 42 7.2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 42 7.2.1 Existing Surface Drainage Characteristics ................................................................................... 42 7.2.2 Existing Water Quality in Surface Streams ................................................................................. 44 7.2.3 Existing Floodplains ..................................................................................................................... 45 7.2.4 Existing Wetlands ........................................................................................................................ 46 8. Groundwater ................................................................................................................................... 48 8.1 Legal and Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................... 48 8.1.1 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) ................................................................ 48 8.1.2 Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA) ................................................................................................ 48 8.1.3 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ........................................................................ 49 8.1.4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ............................................................................. 49 8.2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 49 IH 35 PEL Study Affected Environment Technical Report Page ii 9. Air Quality / Area Emissions ............................................................................................................ 50 9.1 Legal and Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................... 50 9.2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 53 10. Traffic Noise .................................................................................................................................... 54 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Archaeological Assessment of Boerne City Park, Kendall County, Texas
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BOERNE CITY PARK, KENDALL COUNTY, TEXAS Thomas C. Kelly and Thomas R. Hester Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio Archaeological Survey Report, No. 21 1976 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BOERNE CITY PARK, KENDALL COUNTY, TEXAS Thomas C. Kelly and Thomas R. Hester Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio Archaeological Survey Report, No. 21 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 The Survey 1 Results of the Survey 3 Conclusions and Recommendations 6 References Cited 8 INTRODUCTION As part of its planning for development of Boerne City Park, the Advisory Board of the Boerne Parks and Recreation Department authorized an archaeological assessment of the park area in May, 1976. The assessment was carried out by the Center for Archaeological Research at The University of Texas at San Antonio, and was supervised by the authors. We wish to thank Dr. Dewey D. Davis, Chairman, Park Advisory Board, for his assistance during this project. THE SURVEY The scope of our investigation at Boerne City Park can be best described as "cultural resources reconnaissance" (General Rules of Practice and Procedure 1976), to determine the presence and signifi­ cance of any archaeological or historical resources that might lie within the park boundaries. Particular attention was paid to those areas of the park that might be modified through future development. Previous archaeological research in Kendall County has been summarized by Bass and Hester (1975; see also Kelly and Hester 1976); a check of the Center1s files and those of the Texas Archaeological Research Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, revealed that no archaeological or historical sites had been previously documented in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrologic Data for the Lower San Antonio River Sub-Basin
    Technical Study Summaries: Lower San Antonio River Hydrologic Data Median flows in Lower San Antonio River have increased over 60 years The amount of water flowing in the Lower San Antonio River during median flow conditions has increased over the past 60 years, according to data collected from a gage maintained by the US Geological Survey. As shown in the figure below, the median flow of the river at Goliad, TX has increased for each day of the year when comparing values from the time periods 1940-1969 and 1970- 2007. The hydrologic character of the basin can be analyzed using similar techniques and data from a network of USGS gages within the Lower San Antonio River system. The relative location of gages currently maintained by the USGS is shown in the map below. A list of current and historical gages of interest to this is study is also provided. 800 1970 to 2007 700 1940 to 1969 600 500 400 [cfs] Discharge 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc t Nov Dec Figure 1. Median of daily discharge values for USGS gage #08188500, San Antonio River at Goliad. Figure 2. Relative location of current USGS stream gages in the San Antonio River Basin. Table 1. Historical and Current USGS Gages of Interest in the Lower San Antonio River Sub-basin. Earliest Latest Median Drainage Gage # Gage Name Record Record Flow (cfs) Area (mi2) 08181800 San Antonio Rv nr Elmendorf , TX 1962 Present 326 1,743 08182500 Calaveras Ck nr Elmendorf, TX 1954 1971 77.2 08183200 San Antonio Rv nr Floresville, TX 2006 Present 1,964 08183000 San Antonio Rv at
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Trans-Pecos Wildlife Conference
    Proceedings of the Trans-Pecos Wildlife Conference August 1-2, 2002 Sul Ross State University Alpine, Texas Edited by: Louis A. Harveson, Patricia M. Harveson, and Calvin Richardson Recommended Citation Formats: Entire volume: Harveson, L. A., P. M. Harveson, and C. Richardson. eds. 2002. Proceedings of the Trans-Pecos Wildlife Conference. Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas. For individual papers: Richardson, C. 2002. Comparison of deer survey techniques in west Texas. Pages 62- 72 in L. A. Harveson, P. M. Harveson, and C. Richardson, eds. Proceedings of the Trans-Pecos Wildlife Conference. Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas. © 2002. Sul Ross State University P.O. Box C-16 Alpine, TX 79832 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TRANS-PECOS WILDLIFE CONFERENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS PLENARY: MANAGING WEST TEXAS WILDLIFE ........................................................................... 2 TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE'S PRIVATE LANDS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM...................................................3 UPLAND GAME BIRD MANAGEMENT............................................................................................. 8 ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GAMBEL’S QUAIL IN TEXAS ..............................................................9 ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF MONTEZUMA QUAIL ........................................................................11 IMPROVING WILD TURKEY HABITAT ON YOUR RANCH ........................................................................15 PANEL DICUSSION: CAN WE MAINTAIN BLUE QUAIL NUMBERS DURING DROUGHT? .........................21
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cibolo Creek, Final Report, Volume 1
    Impairment Verification Monitoring—Volume 1: Physical, and Chemical Components Segment 1908 Upper Cibolo Creek Prepared for Total Maximum Daily Load Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 13087, MC - 150 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 By James S. Bonner, Ph.D., Principal Investigator F.J. Kelly, M. Beaman and R. Wilkinson Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 Under Texas Engineering Experiment Station Project No. 32525-60880 CC Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Contract No.582-4-58897, Amendment 1 Questions concerning this quality assurance project plan should be directed to: Jim Bonner, Ph.D., P.E., Executive Director Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503 (361) 825-2646 [email protected] Impairment Verification Monitoring—Volume 1: Physical, and Chemical Components Segment 1908 Upper Cibolo EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes water quality data collected on Upper Cibolo Creek (Segment 1908) during the period from August 2002 through July 2004. It has been prepared for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) by the Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science (CBI) at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi under an inter-agency contract between the TCEQ and the Texas Engineering Experiment Station. Upper Cibolo Creek is a 66-mile freshwater stream in the San Antonio River Basin that extends from the Missouri-Pacific railroad Bridge west of Bracken in Comal County to a point 0.9 miles (1.5 km) upstream of the confluence of Champee Springs in Kendall County.
    [Show full text]
  • CWQM Updates Cibolo Creek—A Success Story
    HDR-00070541 Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Background...........................................................................................................................................ES-1 ES.1.1 Water Quality Standards..................................................................................................................ES-1 ES.1.2 Wastewater Treatment .....................................................................................................................ES-2 ES.2 Cibolo Creek Monitoring......................................................................................................................ES-2 ES.3 Water Quality Modeling.......................................................................................................................ES-3 ES.3.1 Modeling Results .............................................................................................................................ES-4 ES.4 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................................ES-4 Section 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Study ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation of Public Meetings
    Documentation of Public Meetings Project Location Bexar County, Guadalupe County Interstate 10 (I-10) 0535-01-074; 0025-02-215; 0025-03-097 Project Limits Loop 1604 to State Highway (SH) 130 Meeting Locations Ray D. Corbett Junior High School 12000 Ray Corbett Dr. Schertz, TX 78154 Seguin City Coliseum 950 S. Austin St. Seguin, TX 78155 Meeting Date and Time October 24, 2017; 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. November 6, 2017; 5 to 7 p.m. Translation Services Spanish (upon request) Elected Officials in Attendance All attended second meeting Chris Rangel, City of Seguin Fonda Mathis, City of Seguin Don Keil, City of Seguin Jeannette “Jet” Crabb, City of Seguin Donna Dodgen, City of Seguin Kyle Kutscher, Guadalupe County John Harrison, office of State Representative Barbara Gervin-Hawkins Total Number of Attendees (approx.) 128, Meeting 1: 50, Meeting 2: 71 Total Number of Commenters 35 760.07.TEM Contents A. Comment/response matrix B. Notices a. Mailed elected official letter and fact sheet b. Elected official mailing list c. Mailed adjacent property owner postcard d. Adjacent property owners mailing list e. Mailed/emailed notifications to stakeholder groups f. Stakeholder group contact list g. Newspaper ads h. Online i. Venue message sign j. TxDOT changeable message boards C. Sign-in sheets D. Comments received E. Open House materials a. Exhibit boards b. Rolling presentation slides c. Meeting photos F. Description of project modifications resulting from public meeting 760.07.TEM A. Comment/response Matrix 760.07.TEM Commenter Commenter Date Source Comment Topic Response Number Name Received Access to FM 78 seems not too good.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cibolo Creek Factsheet Update
    Upper Cibolo Creek Watershed Partnership Upper Cibolo Creek Cibolo Creek originates in the hills west of Boerne in southern Kendall County, Texas. The upper segment (Segment 1908) of Cibolo Creek flows for 23 miles from its headwaters to the confluence of Balcones Creek near the Comal and Kendall County line in Fair Oaks Ranch. Upper Cibolo Creek is fed by numerous tributaries within it’s 76 square-mile watershed and lies within the San Antonio River Basin. Cibolo Creek as a whole, stretches southeast for almost 100 miles before it merges with the San Antonio River. Upper Cibolo Creek is home to Guadalupe bass, the State Fish of Texas, and many other wildlife species who utilize healthy aquatic systems. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has determined Segment 1908 supports high levels of aquatic life and the lower reach has been described The Upper Cibolo Creek Watershed Partnership as an exceptional water body. However, a history of water quality concerns, coupled with trends in To address these concerns, the Upper Cibolo Creek Watershed population growth and changes in land use practices Partnership, a collaboration between local citizens, the City of within the watershed, have created an interest in the Boerne, the Cibolo Nature Center, and state and federal agencies long-term health of the Cibolo. has been formed. The purpose of the Partnership is to develop and implement a voluntary Watershed Protection Plan (WPP). • Anyone can be a member of the Partnership and participate in work groups. • A Steering Committee will be formed as the decision making body for the Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • As a New Century Approaches, the Immense Difficulties Ahead
    OCTOBER 1999 Texas Water Crisis PUBLICATION 1341 A Reprint from Tierra Grande, the Real Estate Center Journal undertake a proactive planning approach in dealing with water policy before those shortages reach a crisis stage in some future drought. Earlier this century, the United States met looming shortages with ambitious public projects that expanded current supplies through construction of large reservoirs. Dam building spread through- out the country, bringing life to the deserts of the arid West. Those projects, however, involved sub- stantial investments of public funds and, unquestionably, altered the environment. As the century draws to a close, public support for such projects has waned, and water policy has shifted from supply aug- mentation strategies to planning for more effective use of existing supplies. Drafted in this atmosphere, the Texas Water Plan described in Water For Texas, published by the Texas Water Develop- ment Board, seeks primarily to facilitate the transfer of water from agricultural irrigation to urban uses. The plan also strives to provide for geographic move- ment of water from areas with surplus supplies to areas facing chronic shortages while minimizing adverse impacts on the environment. Despite the current aversion to new dam construction, the plan includes provisions for eight new reservoirs and provides for conveyance of water from surplus water locales to areas facing shortages. These envisioned solutions imply many changes including projects that create new infrastructure, with the potential for recreation as well as envi- ronmental implications. Looming Water Shortages The state-wide water plan establishes estimates of current usage as well as projected requirements through 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Surveys
    1-> STREAM SURVEYS OF THE ?// Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers BY ROBERT A. KUEHNE Aquatic Biologist TEXAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION H. D. Dodgen, Executive Secretary Austin, 'Texas 659-1054-1500-L150 SECTION I of this report deals with the survey conducted of the Guadalupe River SECTION II of the report deals with the survey conducted of the San Antonio River Division of Inland Fisheries TEXAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Austin, Texas Marion Toole, Director IF Report Series—No. 1 January 1955 FOREWORD This is the first of a series of surveys on lakes and streams in Texas. These surveys are being conducted by the Division of Inland Fish- eries of the Texas Game and Fish Commission in order to determine the status of the state's fresh waters. The series of surveys was begun in July 1951. The two surveys in- cluded in this report were financed by state funds. More recent sur- veys are being conducted under the provisions of the Dingell-Johnson Federal Aid Program. Under the provisions of this program the Fed- eral Government contributes 75 percent of the overall cost of the project, and the State Game and Fish Commission contributes 25 percent of the total cost. MARION TOOLE Division of Intand Fisheries TEXAS GAME 8C FISH COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is gratefully extended to landowners, depart- mental personnel, and other persons who aided in the progress of the San Antonio and Guadalupe River surveys through their interest and cooperation. Special recognition is due Game Wardens Clarence Beezley, Charles Edmondson, and William Sumbling for their assist- ance, and to the late Henry Hahn, Game Biologist, for descriptive information and various courtesies.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You 2018 Supporters
    City of Alpine Paloma Blanca, San Antonio Dr. Ray Allen, Alpine Jeff and Donna Gore, Coleman C.G. Morrison, Alpine Magoo’s Place, Alpine Capital Farm Credit, Alpine Fort Davis State Bank, Fort Davis B&S Services, Alpine West Texas National Bank, Alpine Davis Mountain Dispatch, Fort Davis Stewart Schmidt, Alpine Big Bend Saddlery, Alpine Marfa National Bank, Marfa George Johnson, Alpine Alpine Vet Clinic, Alpine McCoy’s Building Supply Gary Dunshee, Alpine Porter’s Thriftway, Alpine Maverick Inn, Alpine Zesch and Pickett, San Angelo Johnson Feed&WesternWear,Alpine Joy and Apache Adams, Bronte Bob Dillard, Fort Davis Oasis Tire, Alpine Something Special, Alpine Lynne and Larry Baldwin, Fort Davis Highland Inn, Alpine Weaver Leather, Oh. KVLF/KALP, Alpine Flying W Ranch, Alpine John Pace & Assoc, Alpine Big Bend Trailers, Fort Davis Dixon Water Foundation, Dallas Quarter Circle Seven Hotel, Alpine Anza Knives Stacey and Kit Wood, Alpine WTG/Uncle’s Convenience Stores Wayne Baize, Fort Davis Yarborough Ranches, LLP, Alpine, Midland Liz Rogers, Alpine King Saddlery Candice Tijerinia, Alpine Livestock Weekly, San Angelo LaCasita, Alpine, Alpine Visitor’s Center Isabelle Blair, Alpine Dodson Guns, Alpine Cibolo Creek Ranch, Marfa El Patio, Alpine Big Bend Concrete, Alpine Boot Ranch, Alpine Elaina Sharron, Alpine Double K Flowers, Alpine Emison/Y- Ranch, Alpine McCoy Remme Ranches, Fort Davis Spradley Hats, Alpine PeeWee Peebles, Marathon’ Surber Ade Feed, Marfa Stephanie Brooks, Alpine Parker & Parker Cattle Co, Alpine M5 Ranch, Alpine Gail Yovanavich, Alpine Power Pipe and Tank, Amarillo WR Ranch, Alpine Irion Munson Ranch, Barnhart Dr. Bonnie Warnock, Alpine Anne Calaway, Alpine 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Locations
    SAN ANTONIO 1 The Ecumenical Center - HQ TWENTY-ONE LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT 8310 Ewing Halsell Drive SAN ANTONIO AND SOUTH TEXAS. San Antonio, Texas 78229 2 Chapel Hill United Methodist Church 4114 SW Loop 410 6 San Antonio, Texas 78227 BOERNE 46 46 Christ Episcopal Church 3 46 46 510 Belknap Place FAIR OAKS 4 RANCH San Antonio, Texas 78212 Cibolo Creek Community Church 46 46 4 30395 Ralph Fair Road Fair Oaks Ranch, Texas 78015 SAN ANTONIO 5 First Baptist Church of San Antonio 515 McCullough Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78215 12 35 Hill Country Mission for Health 1604 6 HOLLYWOOD PARK 122 Commerce Avenue SHAVANO PARK SELMA HELOTES 281 Boerne, Texas 78006 10 CIBOLO LIVE OAKUNIVERSAL SCHERTZ CITY Mount Zion First Baptist Church SAN ANTONIO 13 INTERNATIONAL 35 333 Martin Luther King Drive RANDOLPH 7 AIRPORT 10 1 AIR FORCE BASE San Antonio, Texas 78203 410 LEON VALLEY Sacred Heart Church 16 ALAMO HEIGHTS 8 BALCONES 78 2114 West Houston Street HEIGHTS 10 1604 11 San Antonio, Texas 78207 1604 281 KIRBY 151 3 410 10 Saint Margaret Mary Catholic Church 9 8 1314 Fair Avenue 7 San Antonio, Texas 78223 35 5 87 2 10 90 410 Schertz United Methodist Church PORT SAN ANTONIO 10 37 3460 Roy Richard Drive 9 LA VERNIA 13 Schertz, Texas 78154 87 Second Baptist Church 410 11 3310 East Commerce Street 1604 ST HEDWIG San Antonio, Texas 78220 Adkins 539 The 181 CARPENTER 539 37 SUTHERLAND Center US Northern Hills United 16 281 SPRINGS La Vernia ELMENDORF 12 87 15 Methodist Church 19 286 3703 North Loop 1604 East 87 18 San Antonio, Texas 78247 14 River Oaks 358 KICASTER
    [Show full text]
  • City of Schertz Notice of General Election 2020
    NOTICE OF GENERAL ELECTION To the registered voters of the City of Schertz: Notice is hereby given that the polling places listed below will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., November 3, 2020, for voting in the general election to elect Councilmembers for Place 3, Place 4 and Place 5. Locations of Early Voting Polling Places: Early voting by personal appearance will be conducted as listed below: Applications for ballot by mail shall be mailed to: Comal County Early Voting Clerk, Bobbie Koepp, 396 N. Seguin Ave., New Braunfels, Texas 78130; Guadalupe County Early Voting Clerk, Lisa Hayes, P.O. Box 1346, Seguin, Texas 78156- 1346; Bexar County Early Voting Clerk, Jacque Callanen, 1103 S. Frio, Ste. 100, San Antonio, Texas 78207-9950. Applications for ballots by mail must be received no later than the close of business on October 23, 2020. AVISO DE ELECCIÓN GENERAL A los votantes registrados de la Ciudad de Schertz: Se hace saber que las casillas electorales citadas abajo se abrirán desde las 7:00 am a 7:00 pm 3 de noviembre de 2020, para votar en las elecciones generales para elegir a los Miembros del Consejo para el lugar 3, para el lugar 4 y para el lugar 5. La aplicación para votar en ausencia por correo deberán enviarse a: Secretaria de Votación Adelantada para el Condado de Comal, Bobie Koepp, 396 N. Seguin Ave., New Braunfels, Texas 78130; Secretaria de Votación Adelanta para el Condado de Guadalupe, Lisa Hayes, P.O. Box 1346, Seguin, Texas 78156-1346; Secretaria de Votación Adelanta para el Condado de Bexar, Jacque Callanen, 1103 S.
    [Show full text]