Divine Fellowship in the Gospel of John: a Trinitarian Spirituality
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 12 Original Research Divine fellowship in the Gospel of John: A Trinitarian spirituality Author: This article investigates how Trinity features are presented in the Gospel of John and how the 1 Dirk Van der Merwe early Christians experienced the Trinity in their daily lives. The immanence and ‘lived Affiliation: experiences’ of the divine are fostered by how the immanence of the divine is expounded in 1Faculty of Theology, terms of the familia Dei: God as Father, the Logos as Son of God, believers as Children of God North-West University, and the Spirit-Paraclete as the one who constitutes the family and educates the children in the Potchefstroom, South Africa family. Therefore, in this article, the familia Dei will be the facilitating hermeneutical principle Corresponding author: used to examine the divine fellowship as well as the ‘lived experiences’ and immanence of the Dirk Van der Merwe, divine in early Christian everyday living. John’s reflection on perichoresis lies embedded in a [email protected] ‘fellowship’ perspective. The divine fellowship is investigated from the four perspectives of how the divine is identified in John: life in thefamilia Dei, love in the familia Dei, unity in the Dates: Received: 06 Jan 2019 familia Dei and glorification in the familia Dei. Accepted: 22 May 2019 Published: 30 Oct. 2019 Keywords: Trinity; Divine-Fellowship; Familia Dei; Identity; Love; Life; Unity; Glorification. How to cite this article: Van der Merwe, D., 2019, Introduction ‘Divine fellowship in the Gospel of John: A Trinitarian From the beginning of the early Church onwards, the early Christians embraced decisively spirituality’, HTS Teologiese exclusive monotheism and the veneration of Jesus. Both forms of Christian worship were already Studies/Theological Studies absolute when Christianity emerged from its original Jewish context (Bauckham 2008:294). Weiss 75(1), a5375. https://doi. org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5375 (1937:I, 37; quoted by Bauckham 2009:232) called the emergence of the worship of Jesus ‘the most significant step of all in the history of the origins of Christianity’. Just more than three decades Copyright: later, Aune (1972:5) made a corresponding consent: ‘[p]erhaps the single most important historical © 2019. The Authors. development within the early church was the rise of the cultic worship of the exalted Jesus within Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the the primitive Palestinian church’. For Hurtado (2003): Creative Commons The accommodation of Jesus as recipient of cultic worship with God is unparalleled and signals a major Attribution License. development in monotheistic cultic practice and belief. This variant form of monotheism appeared among circles who insisted that they maintained faithfulness to the monotheistic stance of the Jewish tradition.1 (pp. 53, 64) After this statement, Hurtado (2003:53) further concluded that ‘[a]ny theory of the origins and development of Jesus-devotion must, therefore, grant a significant role to this monotheistic concern’. Spinks (2008:31), in resonance with the above statements, extended to Jesus the sort of reverence reserved for the one God in biblical tradition. This reverence was not extended to any other figure. Indeed, the early Christians considered this reverence to Jesus as indispensable. Spinks located these views about reverence to Jesus in early Christianity as being reflected in the New Testament.2 John 5:23 is perhaps the most explicit expression of this attitude, declaring that according to God’s will the Son should be reverenced [τιμῶσι] analogously to the reverence of the Father, and that ‘[a]nyone who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him’ (Jn 5:23, NRSV). 1.Prior the advent of Christianity, Judaism demanded the sole worship of its God. This was exclusive among the religions of the Graeco- Roman world. Their perception of God has to be understood in terms of how they regarded the shema: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one’ (Dt 6:4). Jewish monotheism was defined by its adherence to the first two commandments. The God of Israel was the one and only God. This implies that, because he was the sole Creator and only Ruler (supreme) of the universe, only He alone might be worshipped. This fixed Jewish monotheism, which condemned all other religions as idolatrous, also made Christianity an abhorrent oddness in the Roman world. This Jewish attitude in Old Testament monotheism concerned the identity of God and not the nature of God (Bauckham 2008:316–317). 2.To some extent, about 15 years after the crucifixion of Jesus, Paul the Apostle in the first chapter of his First undisputed letter to the Thessalonians already referred explicitly to all three members of the Trinity, God, the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, as being Read online: involved in the lives of the converts in Thessalonica. About two or three years later, he wrote in his undisputed First letter to the Scan this QR Corinthians, ‘Although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth – as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords” – yet for code with your us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all smart phone or things and through whom we exist’ (1 Cor 8:5–6), to summarise the distinctive nature of early Christian devotion. mobile device to read online. Note: The collection entitled ‘God as One’, sub-edited by Erna Oliver (University of South Africa) and Willem Oliver (University of South Africa). http://www.hts.org.za Open Access Page 2 of 12 Original Research Each of the canonical Gospels – Matthew, Mark, Luke and Secondly, a Trinitarian spirituality approach will look into John – portrays an idiosyncratic picture of Jesus Christ. these divine identity characteristics: life in the familia Dei, love Individually, they present distinctive discernments of who in the familia Dei, unity in the familia Dei and, finally, glorification Jesus is and what he accomplished. A comparison between in the familia Dei. The fellowship that occurs within the Trinity these four canonical gospels exhibits both unity and diversity. (deduced from Jn 17:21–23, ἐν and ἕν) should become evident Their witness concerns the same Jesus (unity) but, viewing and experiential in the Johannine community (Jn 15:1–8, him from idiosyncratic perspectives (diversity). In fact, it can μείνατε ἐν) so ‘that the world may believe’ (πιστεύῃ, Jn 17:21) be deduced that they, through their authors, express four and ‘that the world may know’ (γινώσκῃ, Jn 17:23) that the unique ‘lived experiences’ (spiritualities) of Jesus. Father has sent the Son into the world. ‘Matthew presents Jesus as the Jewish Messiah, the fulfillment Perichoresis in the familia Dei of Old Testament’ expectations (Combrink 1980:85; Strauss When reading John, the reader is presented with the concept 2007:171–211); ‘Mark portrays him as the suffering (Servant), of monotheism as early as in the prologue. The author uses Son of God, who offers himself as a sacrifice for sins’ (Strauss the singular form every time when referring to God: in John 2007:213–258; Vorster 1980:131); ‘Luke depicts Jesus as the 1:1 (‘καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν’) and John 1:18 (‘Θεὸν οὐδεὶς Savior for all people. He conveys salvation to all nations’ ἑώρακεν πώποτε’). Simultaneously, the Logos, referred to later (Du Plessis 1980:171–172; Strauss 2007:259–296); and in John, in the prologue as Jesus Christ and the one and only Son/ Jesus is the Christ, eternal Son of God, the self-revelation of God (μονογενὴς υἱός/θεός, Jn 1:18),5 is also depicted as being God the Father (Coetzee 1993:57; Strauss 2007:297–343; in a close relationship with God when he is referred to as God cf. Köstenberger 2013:23). What is important here is that (‘θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος’, Jn 1:1, 18), through the use of ‘the Word was these four perspectives (experiences) of Jesus complement with God’ (‘ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν’, Jn 1:1) and through the one another. use of ‘being in the bosom of the Father’ (‘ὁ ὢν εἰς τὸν κόλπον τοῦ πατρὸς’, Jn 1:18). In John, the veneration of Jesus is distinctly evident,3 and even the divine identity of the Spirit-Paraclete is Then, at the end of the prologue, John states that ‘nobody has acknowledged. For John, the three divine Persons are within ever seen6 God’ (Jn 1:18; see also Jn 5:38; 6:46; 1 Jn 4:12, 20). If themselves a ‘familia Dei’ prior to any inclusion of disciples of this is so, how can humans speak about or even communicate Jesus. These three divine Persons constitute by themselves a with this (monotheistic) God? John then, influenced by the ‘family’ characterised by their ‘lived experiences’ of one Old Testament7 and the early Christian church,8 identifies another expressed as mutual ‘life, unity, love and glorification’. God with ‘Father’ (Jn 1:18), Jesus as ‘Son’ (Jn 1:18) and This is the dynamism for John’s understanding of who God believers as ‘children of God’ (Jn 1:12) to constitute the familia is, and which explains Stamatovic’s ‘perichoresis’4 (Stamatovic ́ Dei in John. To become part of the familia Dei, people have to 2016:304). be born from God (by the Spirit, Jn 1:13; cf. also Jn 3:5, 6, 8).9 These metaphors not only objectify the divine10 but also The choice of ‘divine fellowship’ in the title of the article is enable believers to talk about the divine, to communicate because of the fact that, in John, the three persons of the with the divine and to experience the divine.