Biograhphy of Louise Arbour
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US Scholars on Arrest and Trial of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda
US scholars on arrest and trial of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda November 30, 2020 November 18, 2020 United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 423 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510-6225 Phone : (202) 224-4651 US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs 2170 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone : (202) 225-5021 Letter re : Arrest and Trial of Paul Rusesabagina for Supporting Terrorist Attacks Against Rwanda We, College President, university professors, researchers, lawyers, engi- neers, and professionals in other areas, as American citizens and US residents, are writing this letter to draw your attention to the interests of the United States that are implicated in the arrest of Paul Rusesabagina on terrorism charges and his ongoing trial in Rwanda. Paul Rusesabagina was arrested in Rwanda on August 31, 2020, and he is being tried for terrorism in Rwandan criminal courts. Since his arrest, a number of news outlets, social media, human rights organizations, and com- mentators have consistently referred to him as “Hotel Rwanda hero” without going beyond that label created by a fictional movie and so conveniently without mentioning the real reason of his arrest and trial. The heroism attributed to Paul Rusesabagina was created by the 2004 Hollywood movie Hotel Rwanda, in which the main character allegedly saved 1 2 more than 1200 Tutsi who had sought refuge at Hôtel des Mille Collines du- ring the Genocide against the Tutsi. As a work of art and a call of worldwide attention to the genocide, the movie was effective but the characterization of Rusesabagina as a hero has been discredited. -
Louise Arbour and Marie Henein Share Their Personal Reflections on Unconscious Bias in Litigation December 9, 2020
Louise Arbour and Marie Henein Share Their Personal Reflections on Unconscious Bias in Litigation December 9, 2020 In this transformative age when actions against unconscious bias and social injustice have swiftly gathered momentum, two legal phenoms engage in an enlightening Q & A on what this means for us as people, as a profession, and as propellers for change. Hear Louise Arbour and Marie Henein tell us how they have approached unconscious bias and how to combat it. Topics will include the following: • personal experiences with power, privilege and unconscious bias • how to prevent bias and discrimination in workplaces • bias, discrimination and underrepresentation as viewed through a judicial lens • why the existence and consequences of unconscious bias are important to the bench and bar. Speakers The Honourable Louise Arbour, C.C., G.O.Q., Senior Counsel at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP The Honourable Louise Arbour is Senior Counsel and jurist in residence at BLG in Montreal. She provides strategic advice on litigation, governance and international disputes. She is an active mentor of younger lawyers. She recently completed her mandate at the UN as Special Representative of the Secretary- General on International Migration, which led to the adoption of the Global Compact for Migration. She has also held other senior positions at the United Nations, including High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004-2008) and Chief Prosecutor for The International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda (1996 to 1999). She formerly sat as a justice of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1999 to 2004, on the Court of Appeal for Ontario and the Supreme Court of Ontario. -
SFU Thesis Template Files
Security/Development in the Neoliberal Age: Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the United Nation’s Security/Development Dispositif by Rina Kashyap M.A. (Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding), Eastern Mennonite University, 2007 M.Phil. (Diplomacy), Jawaharlal Nehru University, 1991 M.A. (International Studies), Jawaharlal Nehru University, 1989 B.A. (Hons., Political Science), University of Delhi, 1987 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Rina Kashyap 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Rina Kashyap Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: Security/Development in the Neoliberal Age: Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the United Nation’s Security/Development Dispositif Examining Committee: Chair: Anil Hira Professor James Busumtwi-Sam Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Laurent Dobuzinskis Supervisor Associate Professor Genevieve Fuji Johnson Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Internal Examiner Professor School of Communication Rob Walker External Examiner Professor Department of Political Science University of Victoria Date Defended/Approved: March 30, 2016 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract The concept of ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) as a response to situations of violent conflict and insecurity, was first formally articulated by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) in 2001, and subsequently endorsed by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly through the Summit Outcome Document (SOD) in 2005. Since then, various UN agencies appear to have accepted R2P by incorporating aspects of the concept into their institutional and operational mandates. Literature on the subject places R2P in the security realm where it is either heralded as a ‘paradigm shift’ towards progressive humanitarianism or denounced as a mask for imperial militarism. -
Annual Report
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R. -
Carissima Mathen*
C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench. -
Living Philanthropic Values: Maintaining a “Listening Ear”
2015 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2015 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, the World Affairs Council of Northern California or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at the World Affairs Council. Special thanks go to the GPF team — Suzy Antounian, Britt-Marie Alm, Pearl Darko, Brett Dobbs, Sylvia Hacaj, Ashlee Rea, Sawako Sonoyama, and Nicole Wood — for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. FOUNDATION PARTNERS NoVo Foundation Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The David & Lucile Packard Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation Foundation Skoll Foundation SUPPORTING MEMBERS Skoll Global Threats Fund Citi Foundation International Finance Corporation Dangote Foundation The World Bank Ford Foundation The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley MEMBERS Charitable Trust AbbVie Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United The Aspen Institute Inter-American Development Bank Mr. & Mrs. William H. Draper III Maja Kristin Omidyar Network John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Salesforce.com Foundation Foundation Sall Family Foundation Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Waggener Edstrom Communications Newman’s Own Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of the World Affairs Council of Northern California. -
Songs of Soldiers
SONGS OF SOLDIERS DECOLONIZING POLITICAL MEMORY THROUGH POETRY AND SONG by Juliane Okot Bitek BFA, University of British Columbia, 1995 MA, University of British Columbia, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Interdisciplinary Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) November 2019 © Juliane Okot Bitek, 2019 ii The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Songs of Soldiers: Decolonizing Political Memory Through Poetry And Song submitted by Juliane Okot Bitek in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studies Examining Committee: Prof. Pilar Riaño-Alcalá, (Social Justice) Co-supervisor Prof. Erin Baines, (Public Policy, Global Affairs) Co-supervisor Prof. Ashok Mathur, (graduate Studies) OCAD University, Toronto Supervisory Committee Member Prof. Denise Ferreira da Silva (Social Justice) University Examiner Prof. Phanuel Antwi (English) University Examiner iii Abstract In January 1979, a ship ferrying armed Ugandan exiles and members of the Tanzanian army sank on Lake Victoria. Up to three hundred people are believed to have died on that ship, at least one hundred and eleven of them Ugandan. There is no commemoration or social memory of the account. This event is uncanny, incomplete and yet is an insistent memory of the 1978-79 Liberation war, during which the ship sank. From interviews with Ugandan war veterans, and in the tradition of the Luo-speaking Acholi people of Uganda, I present wer, song or poetry, an already existing form of resistance and reclamation, as a decolonizing project. -
Background About Paul Rusesabagina and the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation ! ! This Year Marks the 20Th Anniversary of the Rwandan Genocide
!Background about Paul Rusesabagina and the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation ! ! This year marks the 20th Anniversary of the Rwandan Genocide. After the Genocide, Paul Rusesabagina and his family had to leave Rwanda for their safety because the current !Rwandan leadership under President Paul Kagame, does not take criticism very well. ! Paul and his wife Taciana reside part time in Brussels where they have two married daughters and four grandchildren. They also reside in San Antonio, Texas. They have four children in !college and graduate school in the U.S. ! Paul started his the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation to care for widows and orphans after the Genocide. Just as Paul had spoken up about the problems with the pre Genocide Rwandan Hutu leadership, he has continued to speak out about the civil rights abuses and !crimes against humanity being perpetrated by the President Kagame in Rwanda and the Congo. ! A few years ago Kagame’s people kicked the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation (HRRF) out of the country and Paul Rusesabagina focused his efforts on trying to heal a nation and build a sustainable peace in the Great Lakes region of Africa. Today the area is like a simmering volcano and Rusesabagina hopes to get the US to intervene before another war !breaks out in Rwanda. ! Rusesabagina travels the world to educate people about the Genocide and the need for an internationally sanctioned Truth and Reconciliation process for Rwanda and the Great Lakes region to prevent another war in Rwanda and to stop the violence and atrocities in the Congo. ! He speaks to governments to advocate to prevent some of the violence and crimes being committed in the region now rather than waiting until more millions are killed. -
Gosselin V. Que´Bec (Attorney General)
Gosselin v. Que´bec (Attorney General) Gwen Brodsky, Rachel Cox, Shelagh Day and Kate Stephenson Authors’ Note Some of the authors of this judgment have a history with Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General) that pre-dates the creation of the Women’s Court of Canada. Rachel Cox and Gwen Brodsky were co-counsel to the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL) in its 2001 intervention in Gosselin at the Supreme Court of Canada. Shelagh Day was an advisor to NAWL’s legal team in that litigation. Kate Stephenson was not directly involved in the Gosselin case, but her work as a leading anti-poverty litigator makes her intimately familiar with the reasoning and outcome. Each of the authors has been affected by the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision. Rachel Cox, who lived in Montre´ al in the 1980s when the Social Aid Regulation reduced young people’s welfare benefit by two-thirds, felt keenly the gulf between the reality of the time and the Supreme Court of Canada’s characterization of the scheme as ‘‘an affirmation of [young people’s] potential’’ and dignity. For those living in Que´ bec in the 1980s, the reason for the reduced rate was clear: to save the government money. Even if people disagreed about whether that was right or wrong, no one believed at the time that the government had designed the scheme in a sincere effort to help young people on welfare. There was a recession and somebody had to pay. Simply put, the court case was about whether or not it was legal for the government to make already very poor welfare recipients pay so much of the cost. -
Poverty Law and Society Series W
Poverty Law and Society Series W. Wesley Pue, General Editor The Law and Society Series explores law as a socially embedded phenom- enon. It is premised on the understanding that the conventional division of law from society creates false dichotomies in thinking, scholarship, educational practice, and social life. Books in the series treat law and society as mutually constitutive and seek to bridge scholarship emerging from interdisciplinary engagement of law with disciplines such as politics, social theory, history, political economy, and gender studies. A list of the titles in this series is available at http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/ series_law.html Edited by Margot Young, Susan B. Boyd, Gwen Brodsky, and Shelagh Day Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism © UBC Press 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the publisher, or, in Canada, in the case of photocopying or other reprographic copying, a licence from Access Copyright (Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency), www.accesscopyright.ca. 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in Canada on ancient-forest-free paper (100% post-consumer recycled) that is processed chlorine- and acid-free, with vegetable-based inks. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Poverty : rights, social citizenship, and legal activism / edited by Margot Young [et al.]. (Law and Society, ISSN 1496-4953) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7748-1287-0 1. Public welfare – Law and legislation – Canada. -
Trialwatch Report on the Trial of Paul Rusesabagina Questions the Fairness of Any Conviction
TRIALWATCH REPORT ON THE TRIAL OF PAUL RUSESABAGINA QUESTIONS THE FAIRNESS OF ANY CONVICTION This statement can be attributed to a spokesperson for the Clooney Foundation for Justice. For further inquiries, please contact [email protected]. Photo Source: Amnesty International June 17, 2021 CHARGE “Has the court in Rwanda predetermined Mr. Rusesabagina’s Terrorism-Related Crimes guilt?” asks Geoffrey Robertson QC, the TrialWatch Expert who is assessing the fairness of the trial of the ‘Hotel Rwanda’ figure and will assign it a grade. POTENTIAL SENTENCE A TrialWatch report, by Mr. Robertson and the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights, finds numerous violations of Life imprisonment Paul Rusesabagina’s rights. These include denial of the facilities necessary for him to prepare his defense and violation of his right to confidential communication with his lawyers. The report stresses that TRIAL MONITOR although Mr. Rusesabagina has withdrawn from the trial, it remains essential that his fair trial rights be protected. The report calls into American Bar Association question the fairness of any convicting verdict. Center for Human Rights Trials in absentia require scrupulous respect for defendants’ rights. However, Geoffrey Robertson QC said: “The trial of Paul Rusesabagina has degenerated into a ‘show trial,’ in which no challenge is permitted to undermine the state’s story.” He explained: • “Even before Mr. Rusesabagina withdrew, the court protected a key witness by disallowing cross-examination and refusing even to require him to testify on oath. This witness—Bishop Constantin Niyomwungeri, the man who allegedly tricked Mr. Rusesabagina into boarding a flight to Rwanda—was key to the court’s finding that Mr. -
Genocide Or Just Another “Casualty of War”?: the Implications of the Memo Attributed to President Yoweri K
Genocide or Just Another “Casualty of War”?: The Implications of the Memo Attributed to President Yoweri K. Museveni of Uganda1 Todd David Whitmore University of Notre Dame n one occasion during the course of my fieldwork in Uganda, a person passed to me a document that purported to be a memo from Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni to Ohis brother Salim Saleh. The author of the memo refers to the Acholi people of northern Uganda as “Chimpanzees” and “Monkeys” and wants to “drastically reduce the population” so that he can obtain their abundant and fertile land (“I have now realized that the Monkeys called Acholis are sitting upon Gold Mine”). Given the potential importance of the memo, I had the document assessed as to its possible authenticity by two experts on Uganda’s political history and one scholar on African political leaders. Based on their judgments and further investigation of my own into the possible authenticity of the document, I have decided to make the memo public. It is available for viewing at musevenimemo.org. In the present article, I provide my own analysis of the memo. In the first major section of the article, I describe the context within which I received it. All documents have their social set- tings, and understanding those settings is important for interpreting the documents. The broader social context in which I received the memo is one of intrigue. Although I came to Uganda to study traditional Acholi culture and its interaction with Christianity (I am a theologian by train- ing), from the start I have been closely monitored and even followed by government operatives.