DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Report DRUG USE 1977– Among Ontario Students Detailed Findings from the Ontario 2019 Student Drug Use and Health Survey SUMMARY REPORT OSDUHS Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey The 2019 OSDUHS Drug Use Report Summary The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health’s This report describes the 2019 results for use of Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, illicit drugs, (OSDUHS) has been conducted every two years prescription drugs, as well as changes over since 1977, making it the longest ongoing time. Also examined are harms related to drug school survey of adolescents in Canada, and use, perceptions and attitudes, and exposure to one of the longest in the world. Between drugs. All data are based on self-reports November 2018 and June 2019, a total of derived from anonymous questionnaires 14,142 students in grades 7 to 12 from 992 completed in classrooms. The survey was classes, in 263 schools, in 47 school boards administered by the Institute for Social participated in the 2019 cycle of the OSDUHS. Research (at York University) on CAMH’s behalf. Past Year Drug Use (%) for the Total Sample, by Sex, and by Grade, 2019 OSDUHS (N=14,142) Total Males Females G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 Grades 7–12 Alcohol 41.7 40.6 42.8 7.3 15.8 30.3 45.2 57.0 66.0 * High-Caffeine Energy Drinks 32.6 38.8 26.1 * 18.9 28.9 32.7 32.3 38.1 36.4 * Electronic Cigarettes (Vapes) 22.7 23.5 21.8 1.9 5.3 19.6 25.1 30.9 34.9 * Cannabis 22.0 22.6 21.4 1.3 4.7 12.8 21.7 33.1 40.0 * Binge Drinking (5+ drinks, past month) 14.8 14.9 14.7 1.1 3.0 8.7 13.7 21.3 28.2 * Prescription Opioid Pain Relievers (NM) 11.0 10.9 11.0 9.9 11.5 10.1 9.9 11.3 12.5 Cough/Cold Medication (NM) 7.8 9.3 6.2 * 6.9 7.0 8.3 6.5 8.4 8.8 Tobacco Cigarettes 5.0 5.6 4.4 * s 0.7 2.7 3.5 7.5 10.8 * Waterpipes (Hookahs) 4.4 4.5 4.4 s s 2.4 3.7 5.3 9.4 * Smokeless (Chewing) Tobacco 3.9 6.1 1.4 * s s 2.7 2.9 5.5 7.2 * Inhalants (Glue or Solvents) 3.1 2.7 3.6 * 4.5 5.9 3.2 2.9 2.1 1.9 * ADHD Drugs (NM) 2.7 3.2 2.1 * 0.7 1.3 1.9 2.1 3.1 5.0 * Synthetic Cannabis (“Spice,” “K2”) 1.6 2.0 1.2 * s s 1.2 2.7 2.3 1.8 * Grades 9–12† Mushrooms (Psilocybin) or Mescaline 4.5 6.4 2.5 * -- -- 1.3 2.7 5.9 7.3 * Tranquillizers/Sedatives (NM) 2.9 3.1 2.6 -- -- 1.3 1.9 3.9 4.0 * Cocaine 2.6 3.3 1.8 * -- -- 0.9 0.7 2.7 5.2 * Ecstasy (MDMA) 2.3 2.9 1.6 * -- -- 0.7 1.4 2.8 3.7 * LSD 2.0 2.8 1.2 * -- -- 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.3 * Methamphetamine 0.7 0.9 s -- -- s s s s Crack 0.5 0.8 s -- -- s s s s Fentanyl 0.5 s s -- -- s s s s Any NM Use of a Prescription Drug 13.4 13.7 13.0 -- -- 11.3 11.6 13.9 15.8 * Any Drug Use 20.3 22.5 18.0 * -- -- 15.8 17.9 22.0 23.8 * Notes: † not asked of 7th and 8th graders; * statistically significant sex or grade difference (p<.05), not controlling for other factors; s=estimate suppressed due to unreliability; estimate for alcohol excludes “a sip”; estimates for tobacco cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and waterpipes exclude smoking a few puffs; binge drinking refers to drinking five or more drinks on one occasion in the past month; NM=nonmedical use, without a doctor’s prescription; “Any NM Use of a Prescription Drug” refers to the nonmedical use of opioids, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) drugs, or tranquillizers/ sedatives; “Any Drug Use” refers to use of any one of 14 drugs (excludes alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and energy drinks); estimates for heroin were suppressed due to unreliability. 2019 OSDUHS Drug Use Report — Summary i 2019 Subgroup Differences in Drug Use Differences in past year drug use according to The survey design divided the province into sex, grade, and four regions of the province four regions: Greater Toronto Area; Northern are presented in the report. Ontario (Parry Sound District, Nipissing District and farther north); Western Ontario (Dufferin ● Among the drugs asked about in the 2019 County and farther west); and Eastern Ontario survey, males are significantly more likely (Simcoe County and farther east). than females to use 10 drugs, as shown in the table below. Females are more likely ● There are significant regional differences to use inhalants. in drug use. Compared to the provincial average, students in the Greater Toronto Males are more Females are more Area are less likely to use many drugs, likely to use likely to use whereas students in the North, West, and • Energy Drinks • Inhalants East regions are more likely to use several • Cough/Cold Medication (NM) drugs. These regional differences are • Tobacco Cigarettes • Smokeless Tobacco shown in the table below. • ADHD Drugs (NM) • Synthetic Cannabis Use in region below Use in region above • Mushrooms/Mescaline provincial average provincial average • Cocaine • Ecstasy (MDMA) Greater Toronto Area • LSD • Alcohol & Binge Drinking NM=nonmedical use • Energy Drinks • Electronic Cigarettes • Cannabis • Cough/Cold Medication ● Past year use of many drugs significantly • Tobacco Cigarettes differs by grade, as shown in the table below. • Smokeless Tobacco Use of most drugs increases with grade, • ADHD Drugs (NM) peaking in grade 11 or 12. • Mushrooms/Mescaline • Tranquillizers (NM) • Cocaine Use increases Use decreases • Ecstasy (MDMA) with grade with grade • LSD • Alcohol & Binge Drinking • Inhalants North • Energy Drinks • Tobacco Cigarettes • Electronic Cigarettes • Cocaine • Cannabis • Ecstasy (MDMA) • Tobacco Cigarettes West • Waterpipes (Hookahs) • ADHD Drugs (NM) • Smokeless Tobacco • Ecstasy (MDMA) • ADHD Drugs (NM) • Synthetic Cannabis East • Mushrooms/Mescaline • Tobacco Cigarettes • Tranquillizers (NM) • Cough/Cold Medication • Cocaine • ADHD Drugs (NM) • Ecstasy (MDMA) NM=nonmedical use; binge drinking refers to 5+ drinks on one occasion in the past month • LSD NM=nonmedical use; binge drinking refers to 5+ drinks on one occasion in the past month 2019 OSDUHS Drug Use Report — Summary ii Trends in Drug Use 2019 vs. 2017 (e.g., Adderall, Ritalin, Concerta) has significantly increased since 2007 (the first Among the total sample of students, only one year of monitoring), from 1.0% to 2.7%. drug use measure showed an increase between the previous survey in 2017 and the The following drugs or drug use measures 2019 survey. The past year use of electronic show a significant decrease during the period cigarettes (also known as “vapes”) significantly between 1999 and 2019: increased from 10.7% to 22.7%. ● alcohol: from 66.0% to 41.7% Past year use of the following three drugs ● binge drinking: from 27.6% to 14.8% significantly decreased between 2017 and ● energy drinks: from 49.5% (2011) to 32.7% 2019: ● cannabis: from 28.0% to 22.0% ● opioids (NM): from 20.6% (2007) to 11.0% ● tobacco cigarettes (from 7.0% in 2017 to ● tobacco cigarettes: from 28.4% to 5.0% 5.0% in 2019), ● waterpipes: from 9.7% (2013) to 4.4% ● waterpipes (from 6.2% to 4.4%), and ● inhalants: from 8.9% to 3.1% ● ecstasy (MDMA) (from 3.4% to 2.3%). ● mushrooms:∗ from 17.1% to 4.5% ● ecstasy (MDMA):* from 7.9% (2001) to 2.3% ● cocaine:* from 5.7% (2003) to 2.6% 2017 2019 ● LSD:* from 8.8% to 2.0% past year past year ● methamphetamine:*from 6.3% to 0.7% use use ● crack:* from 3.2% to 0.5% Tobacco Cigarettes 7.0% 5.0% ● heroin:* from 2.1% to < 0.5%. Waterpipes (Hookahs) 6.2% 4.4% ● Any nonmedical use of a prescription drug Ecstasy (MDMA) 3.4% 2.3% decreased between 2007 and 2019 (from 23.5% to 13.4%) among grades 9–12. Electronic Cigarettes 10.7% 22.7% ● Any use of at least one of eight drugs measured in all survey cycles (mushrooms, ecstasy, cocaine, LSD, 1999–2019 methamphetamine, crack, heroin, and tranquillizers/sedatives) significantly The study was redesigned in 1999 to include all decreased between 1999 and 2019, from grades between 7 and 12. As such, 1999 is a key 22.8% to 7.8%, among grades 9–12. marker in the study’s history. In this section, we highlight significant changes during the period Drugs that remained relatively stable and between 1999 and 2019. show no dominant trend since their use was first monitored include smokeless tobacco, In general, most past year drug use measures synthetic cannabis (“spice”), cough/cold show a significant downward trend over time, medication (nonmedical use), and with two exceptions. Use of electronic tranquillizers/sedatives (nonmedical use). cigarettes has significantly increased since 2015 (the first year of monitoring) from 11.7% to 22.7%. The nonmedical use of ADHD drugs ∗ among grades 9-12 only (not asked of grade 7 and 8 students) 2019 OSDUHS Drug Use Report — Summary iii Trends by Sex Long-Term Trends in Drug Use, 1977–2019 (Grades 7, 9, and 11 only) Both males and females show a significant increase in past year use of electronic The OSDUHS has been monitoring student cigarettes since the previous survey in 2017, drug use for over 40 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (COVID-19) Epidemiology Update
    Public Health Sudbury & Districts Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemiology Update All information in this report is based on data available from Public Health Sudbury & Districts as of 4:00 PM August 29, 2021, unless otherwise specified. Highlights Active COVID-19 Cases and Outbreaks Public Health Sudbury & Districts is currently reporting: • 38 active cases of COVID-19, of which 19 (50.0%) have screened positive for a COVID-19 variant of concern (VOC) ○ 18 active cases (47.4%) are 19 years old or younger ○ 0 active cases (0.0%) are 60 years old or older ○ 0 active cases (0.0%) are linked to an outbreak ○ 16 active cases (42.1%) have no known epidemiological link (unknown exposure) • 0 new hospitalizations due to COVID-19 in the past 7 days, with 3 cases in hospital at some point during that time. • 0 active outbreaks declared in local hospitals, long-term care homes and retirement homes • 0 active outbreaks declared in local schools and licensed daycares • 2 active outbreaks declared in other community settings Total COVID-19 Cases and Outbreaks Since the beginning of the pandemic, Public Health Sudbury & Districts has reported: • 2,278 cases of COVID-19, of which 1,065 (46.8%) have screened positive for a COVID-19 variant of concern (VOC) ○ 554 cases (24.3%) were 19 years old or younger ○ 401 cases (17.6%) were 60 years old or older ○ 524 cases (23.0%) are linked to an outbreak ○ 341 cases (14.9%) have no known epidemiological link (unknown exposure) • 159 hospitalizations due to COVID-19 • 31 deaths due to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for a Boiler Supply & Servicing Company with The
    Service Area Volume 49 • June 2017 South West tel: 519 884 0600 505 Dotzert Court, fax: 519 884 0213 Unit 1 toll free: 1 800 265 8809 Waterloo, ON N2L 6A7 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca East tel: 613 228 3597 19 Grenfell Crescent, Bay 1 fax: 613 225 0116 Ottawa (Nepean) ON toll free: 1 800 265 8809 K2G 0G3 www.waterloomanufacturing.ca Looking For A Boiler Supply & Servicing Company With The Knowledge & Experience To Get It Right? We are that company and we want to help you optimize your boiler room. Established in 1850, Waterloo Manufacturing Ltd. has a long history of growth and evolution that continues to this day. In our early days we began as a manufacturer of farm machinery equipment, steam engines, pulp and paper rolls, and in 1947, became an authorized Cleaver Brooks Representative for South West Ontario. In 1984, we streamlined the company to further focus on solely providing boiler room equipment solutions in South West Ontario. In 2015, a unique opportunity arose to expand our company to include the Eastern Ontario region formerly covered by John M. Schermerhorn Ltd. In 2017, a further opportunity arose to expand our company to include the territory formerly represented by Johnson Paterson, Inc. to be the sole representative for Cleaver Brooks in the province of Ontario. *Refer to Map on Page 4. Ontario West Central Ontario Ontario East • Brant County • Algoma District • Carleton County • Bruce County • Cochrane District • Dundas County • Dufferin County • Durham County • Frontenac County • Elgin County • Haliburton County • Glengarry
    [Show full text]
  • The Northeastern Ontario Recreation
    The Northeastern Ontario Recreation Association (NeORA), is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life, health and well- being of people and to promote the value and benefits of parks and recreation to the public in their environments throughout Northeastern Ontario. “Our goal is to keep recreation in Northeastern Ontario a priority!” The Northeastern Ontario Recreation Association, in collaboration with its many partners provides training and development; and acts as the representative voice for community sport, recreation and fitness organizations in Northeastern Ontario “Healthier Minds-Healthier Bodies- Healthier Communities” WHAT WE DO! District Hosting the Brokering Training based Annual Partner on Northern Conference Training needs Advocating-the Marketing/ Voice for Promoting the Recreation Networking including Benefits of volunteers Recreation Consulting- Local recognition Promote Provide of recreation Member Assistance to volunteers Benefits Municipalities NEORA’s COMMITMENT Partner with various Work with different levels of stakeholders in the delivery of government in representing training & development community sport, culture, opportunities for community recreation & fitness sport, culture, recreation & organizations. fitness organizations. Partner with the private sector in achieving self-sustainability in its delivery of services to its membership. Student $10 Individual/Community Volunteer $20 Community Group $30 BENEFITS FOR MEMBERS - Host training and workshops - Membership fee is embedded in the conference fee -Listing
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2012 Newsletter
    The Indianapolis Radio Club Newsletter Founded 1914 “The oldest continuously operating Amateur Radio Club in the United States” Summer 2012 Newsletter Upcoming Meetings: September 14: Experiences of the New Mexico Field Day Gang October 12: Tentative Antenna Discussion Highlights from the June Meeting: This was the annual auction. There were around 45 in attendance. Eight sellers made just under $400, with over $250 being donated to the club. Ham Radio News: WA5LOU IS NEW INDIANA SECTION MANAGER The incumbent Indiana Section Manager -- John Poindexter, W3ML, of Knox, who has served as Section Manager since 2009 -- decided not to run for a new term of office. Two radio amateurs vied for the open position, with Lou Everett Sr, WA5LOU, of Indianapolis, being declared the winner with 596 votes. His opponent Brian Jenks, W9BGJ, of Fort Wayne, received 429 votes. Everett has been serving in the Indiana Field Organization as the Indiana Section Traffic Manager, a Net Manger, Official Relay Station and as an Official Observer. VANITY CALL SIGN FEE TO INCREASE SEPTEMBER 4 On August 3, the FCC announced via a Final Rule in the Federal Register that the cost of an Amateur Radio vanity call sign will increase 80 cents, from $14.20 to $15. The new fees take effect 30 days after publication, making September 4, 2012, the first day the new fee is in effect. Earlier this year, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order (NPRM), seeking to raise the fee for Amateur Radio vanity call signs. The vanity call sign regulatory fee is payable not only when applying for a new vanity call sign, but also upon renewing a vanity call sign for a new 10 year term.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: the Case of Chatham-Kent
    Western Public Health Casebooks Volume 2018 2018 Article 19 2018 Case 14 : Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The aC se of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner Western University Stanley Ing Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Laura Zettler Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Gerald McKinley Western University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/westernpublichealthcases Recommended Citation Turner, T., Ing, S., Zettler, L., McKinley, G. (2018). Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The asC e of Chatham-Kent. in: McKinley, G. & Sibbald, S.L. [eds] Western Public Health Casebook 2018. London, ON: Public Health Casebook Publishing. This Case is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Public Health Casebooks by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health CASE 14 Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The Case of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner, BSc, MPH (MPH Class of 2017) Stanley Ing, MPH, CPHI(c) (Epidemiologist, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Laura Zettler, MSc (Epidemiologist/Program Manager, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Gerald McKinley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Western University) Today’s generation is likely the first to be less healthy and die sooner than their parents’ generation (Heart & Stroke, 2017). This statement should activate the critical and analytical parts of one’s thinking to ask: “Are certain populations more affected than others?”; “What are the social, ethical, medical, and economical implications?”; and ultimately; “Why?” To evaluate a population’s health requires an understanding of the population itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatham-Kent's Fast Intervention Risk Specific
    CHATHAM-KENT’S FAST INTERVENTION RISK SPECIFIC TEAMS FINAL EVALUATION REPORT Submitted to: Sgt. Jim Lynds Chatham-Kent Police Service & Marjorie Crew Family Service Kent Submitted by: Dr. Chad Nilson Vice President of Research and Evaluation (306) 953-8384 [email protected] November 2016 This project has been funded by an Ontario Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services Proceeds of Crime Frontline Policing Grant. It has also been supported with funding by Chatham-Kent Employment and Social Services. This report was prepared at the request of Chatham-Kent Police Service, in partnership with Family Service Kent. For more information on Chatham-Kent’s FIRST Strategy, please contact: Marjorie Crew, Coordinator 50 Adelaide St S. Chatham-Kent, ON N7M 6K7 (519) 354-6221 [email protected] For further information on Global Network for Community Safety, please contact: The Global Network for Community Safety, Inc. 192 Spadina Ave. Suite 401 Toronto, ON M5T C2C (905) 767-3467 [email protected] To reference this report, please use the following citation: Nilson, C. (2016). Chatham-Kent’s Fast Intervention Risk Specific Teams: Final Evaluation Report. Toronto, ON: Global Network for Community Safety. Chatham-Kent FIRST - Final Evaluation Report 1 To the human service professionals leading collaborative risk-driven intervention in Chatham-Kent, thank you for all that you contributed to this evaluation process. - CN Chatham-Kent FIRST - Final Evaluation Report 2 CHATHAM-KENT’S FAST INTERVENTION RISK SPECIFIC TEAMS FINAL EVALUATION REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ABOUT FIRST Launched in February of 2016, Chatham-Kent’s Fast Intervention Risk Specific Teams (FIRST) Strategy provides an opportunity for human service providers to mitigate risk before harm occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Areas Serviced by the NBPSDHU B-G-001
    Geographic Areas Serviced by the North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit – B-G-001 Board of Health Policy 1.0 Policy Statement The Board of Health for the North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit (Health Unit) provides its programs and services in the geographic areas determined by Ontario legislation and/or funding criteria. 2.0 Purpose This policy describes the geographic areas serviced by the Health Unit as legislated by the Province of Ontario. 3.0 Scope / Responsibility This policy sets out the geographic areas serviced by the Health Unit. The Board of Health through the Medical Officer of Health/Executive Officer ensures that this policy is followed. 4.0 Procedure Areas serviced by the Health Unit include (see maps on pages 3 and 4 below): a) The City of North Bay b) The areas in East Nipissing, including, the Municipalities of Calvin, East Ferris, and Mattawan, the Town of Mattawa, the Townships of Bonfield, Chisholm, and Papineau-Cameron. c) The Municipality of West Nipissing. d) The areas in North East Parry Sound District, including, the Municipalities of Powassan and Callander, the Villages of South River and Sundridge, and the Townships of Machar and Nipissing. e) The areas in South East Parry Sound District, including, the Municipality of Magnetawan, the Town of Kearney, the Village of Burk’s Falls, the Townships of Armour, Joly, McMurrich/Monteith, Perry, Ryerson, and Strong. f) The areas in West Parry Sound District, including, the Municipalities of McDougall and Whitestone, the Town of Parry Sound, the Townships of Carling, McKellar, Seguin, and The Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • New Documentary Series Features Local History Visual Heritage Project fi Lms to Air on TVO
    B4 THE FORESTER, Wednesday, December 23, 2009 The Huntsville Forester DINING & ENTERTAINMENT New documentary series features local history Visual Heritage Project fi lms to air on TVO Beginning on Saturday, Jan. 9 the Ontario Kent. While regional television stations have The Ontario Trillium Foundation is an OTF continues to strengthen the capac- Visual Heritage Project series The Shield shown many of the projects, The Shield will agency of the government of Ontario. For ity of the volunteer sector through invest- will premiere on TVOntario. This eight- be the first to be broadcast to a provincial over 25 years, the foundation has supported ments in community-based initiatives. part documentary series on the history of audience. the growth and vitality of communities For more information, please visit www. Muskoka, the West Parry Sound District, “TVO is committed to programming that across the province. trilliumfoundation.org. the City of Greater Sudbury and Manitoulin explores all aspects of Ontario’s history and Island will air on Saturdays at 4 p.m. and culture. We are particularly pleased to bring run until Feb. 27. our audience these fascinating, comprehen- This dynamic series was shot in high sive films that really bring our province’s definition and is the work of professionals rich local history to life,” said Christine Lee, and local volunteers who gave their time to head of history acquisitions at TVOntario. re-enact historic events, research local sto- When discussing the series, director ries, make excursions to historic sites, and Zach Melnick noted that his team is “always give interviews about their past.
    [Show full text]
  • Parry Sound District…A Destination for Secondary Migrants?
    For Immediate Release Parry Sound District…a destination for secondary migrants? March 30, 2017 – Northern Policy Institute, in partnership with the Northern Ontario Workforce Planning Boards, has released the sixth report of their joint effort; Northern Projections: Human Capital Series. The report, authored by James Cuddy and Bakhtiar Moazzami, focuses on the Parry Sound District, proposing secondary migration from the Greater Toronto Area as a solution to slow-growth population numbers. The population in Parry Sound is growing, but very slowly. According to the most recent 2016 Statistics Canada census numbers, the district grew from 33,828 to 42,824 – a 26.6 percent increase from 1986 to 2016. Authors of the report project that the district’s total population is expected to slightly increase by only 0.6 percent from 2013 to 2041. At the same time, the Parry Sound district has experienced positive intraprovincial migration for the past decade as individuals from Ontario have moved into the region from other parts of the province. So, while the projected numbers may look dim, opportunities to increase the population can be found in marketing the district of Parry Sound as a desirable destination for secondary migrants who are looking to move north. Even more promising is the fact that the human capital indexes, level of knowledge and skills that affect productivity, for immigrants in the district are higher than the total working-age population across all jurisdictions. “With significant numbers of unemployed and underemployed new Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area, and Parry Sound district's relative proximity to this part of the province, there is a real opportunity for the Parry Sound district to address its population challenges by playing to its demonstrated strength in supporting newcomer success,” stated Stacie Fiddler, Executive Director, The Labour Market Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Parry Sound Area: Structural Features, Landsat Images
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Courier the GREY, BRUCE, DUFFERIN & SIMCOE POSTAL HISTORY STUDY GROUP No
    The Georgian Courier THE GREY, BRUCE, DUFFERIN & SIMCOE POSTAL HISTORY STUDY GROUP No. 54 • Vol. 11, No. 4 ISSN 1481-9511 May 2014 The Early Years [ref. 273] other form of industry, the majority of the workers and BYNG INLET their families left. The steamers Waubuno and Northern Belle provided Parry Sound District local service on the bay. The lumber merchants built their own steamer the Magnetawan at Byng Inlet in 1877 to com- W. Bruce Graham pete for the local trade. Until the arrival of the C.P.R. in 1908, lumber was trans- ported by various ships, The Lily Kerr, Minnie Hall, The yng inlet is situated in Wallbridge Township, Parry Resolute, Julien V. O'Brien, Mohegan and the tug John Junior. Sound District at the mouth of the Magnetawan Byng Inlet depended on steamers for mail delivery dur- RiverB on Georgian Bay. The post office opened on July 1, ing the navigation season, the winter route was overland. 1868, with Charles Little as postmaster. (Fig. 1) One of the earliest industries in the Georgian Bay area was lumbering. The abundance of timber and the many rivers and streams leading to the bay at Byng Inlet made it an ideal location for sawmills. By 1871 there were two lumber companies which had sawmills at the town. By 1890 Byng Inlet cut more lumber than all the mills com- bined on Georgian Bay. The town grew quickly and by 1900 the population was 5000. The Graves and Bigwood Company became the domi- nant sawmill operation by 1906 and lasted until resources dried up around 1927.
    [Show full text]