DOCSLIB.ORG

Countering Technology-Facilitated Abuse: Criminal Justice Strategies for Combating Nonconsensual Pornography, Sextortion, Doxing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Countering Technology-Facilitated Abuse: Criminal Justice Strategies for Combating Nonconsensual Pornography, Sextortion, Doxing Countering Technology-Facilitated Abuse Criminal Justice Strategies for Combating Nonconsensual Pornography, Sextortion, Doxing, and Swatting Amanda R. Witwer, Lynn Langton, Michael J. D. Vermeer, Duren Banks, Dulani Woods, Brian A. Jackson EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although digital technologies interactions might not realize that allow users to share content that they have been victim- SELECTED PRIORITY NEEDS and interact in virtual spaces ized, and justice system officials afford many conveniences in might not recognize TFA as a RESULTS day-to-day life, their growing crime. Moreover, the charac- prevalence has enabled harmful teristics of digital spaces that Implementing public education and TFA prevention efforts and abusive digital interactions, are designed to protect privacy • Basic primary education should be developed for kids including a class of behaviors also make criminal instances of and parents about consent and about the risks and termed technology-facilitated TFA difficult to investigate and consequences of sharing information online. abuse (TFA). For the purposes adjudicate. Digital anonym- • A conceptual framework or taxonomy for definitions of of this report, TFA refers to acts ity, the ability to collect digital TFA should be developed so that criminal justice practi- or courses of conduct facilitated evidence, and the involvement tioners can recognize it and respond. through digital means that com- of such technology-related Promoting awareness of TFA among criminal justice promise the victim’s privacy and entities as internet providers practitioners cause them emotional, physi- and social media platforms all • Approaches to incentivize law enforcement and pros- cal, or reputational harm. The present significant challenges ecutors to prioritize TFA cases should be identified. consequences of TFA, which to law enforcement and courts. • Training materials should be developed for law enforce- includes such acts as cyberstalk- Criminal justice practitioners ment about TFA, the impact on victims, and the associ- ing, swatting, doxing, non- have struggled to keep up with ated statutes. consensual pornography, and the rapid pace of advancements Improving criminal justice practices and policies for sextortion, extend far beyond in digital technologies, limiting addressing TFA the digital realm. These acts not efforts to bring TFA offenders • Training on interviewing techniques for delicate or trau- only can cause victims to experi- to justice and mitigate the harm matic situations should be conducted. ence serious psychological dis- done to TFA victims. tress but also can harm relation- • Specific resources for TFA should be designated so that On behalf of the National ships with family, friends, and TFA investigations do not take resources away from Institute of Justice (NIJ) and other areas. partners and disrupt educational as part of the Priority Criminal and professional pursuits. Mitigating harm and empowering TFA victims Justice Needs Initiative, RTI • Research should be conducted and data should be gath- A lack of consensus among the International and RAND Cor- ered to evaluate the harm of TFA and the effectiveness public, researchers, and civil and poration researchers convened of remedies. criminal justice practitioners on a workshop called “Countering • Coordination about what the victim wants, their fears, how to label and characterize Technology-Facilitated Abuse” and their experience should be promoted among law TFA behaviors hinders efforts to on July 17th and 18th, 2019. enforcement, crisis providers, and lawyers. identify these acts. Individuals (See RAND Corporation, who experience these harmful undated-b, for more informa- 2 tion about the Priority Crimi- scope and consequences of WHAT WE FOUND nal Justice Needs Initiative). TFA; current legal standards for The workshop was held at the addressing TFA; and techniques • Nine of the high-priority legal—to address TFA cases Office of Justice Program’s and policies to equip law enforce- needs highlighted the criti- effectively; five of the high- (OJP’s) headquarters in Wash- ment officers, prosecutors, and cal importance of raising priority needs addressed this ington, D.C., and was intended lawmakers to effectively address awareness of the prevalence, issue. Developing standards to inform NIJ’s research challenging digital crimes while costs, and harms of TFA and training around the behaviors among the general identification, collection, agenda. (See NIJ, undated, for protecting individual rights, such public and criminal justice and processing of digital more information.) RTI and as freedom of speech and privacy. practitioners. Recommenda- evidence and establishing RAND researchers assembled a After our discussions, work- tions for improving public specialized TFA units would diverse group of subject-matter shop participants identified and awareness included the enable law enforcement to experts to discuss the practical, prioritized a list of 48 potential development of a conceptual conduct thorough inves- legal, and policy challenges to framework of TFA behav- tigations of TFA crimes. strategies for addressing TFA. effectively addressing TFA. The iors and the provision of Instituting statutes specific In the context of the Priority workshop was initially titled school-based public educa- to TFA behaviors, accompa- Criminal Justice Needs Initia- “Internet-Enabled Harass- tion around internet safety. nied by sentencing guide- tive, these strategies for advanc- ment,” but the workshop Participants determined that lines that acknowledge the ing promising innovations or participants determined that TFA legislation, empiri- harms to and vulnerabilities potential solutions to problems cal measurements of the of TFA victims, would allow technology-facilitated abuse was are referred to as needs. Needs profound harms and costs prosecutors to ensure that a more-comprehensive and were ranked by participants of TFA behaviors, and pri- TFA sentences are commen- more-accurate term to describe according to whether they were oritization by leadership are surate with harm and that the full variety of platforms high (Tier 1), medium (Tier 2), key to ensuring that TFA victims’ needs are met. that can facilitate the harmful or lower (Tier 3) priority (see cases are prioritized by law interactions that include sextor- enforcement and courts. • A core theme of the partici- the technical appendix for tion, doxing, and other forms pant discussion articulated more details on the method- of abuse perpetrated through • Several high-priority in four high-priority needs ology used to prioritize the needs emphasized the was the critical importance technological media. Although needs). Twenty-one of the need for trauma-informed of efforts to mitigate the the number of participants was identified strategies (or needs) approaches to investigating significant, irreparable, and restricted to facilitate construc- stemming from the workshop and adjudicating TFA cases. persistent harm experienced tive discussion, participants were deemed to be high prior- These approaches would by TFA victims. Participants were intended to represent key acknowledge the profound called for research to evaluate ity (Tier 1). The high-priority perspectives on the challenges harm done to TFA victims. the extent to which exist- needs reflect four key themes associated with preventing Participants observed that ing remedies mitigate harm, that arose in participant and punishing TFA, includ- TFA cases require greater tools for early detection of discussions: (1) implement- ing considerations related to engagement with victims by TFA, and methods for miti- ing public education and TFA victims’ rights and freedom criminal justice practitio- gating the effects of TFA and prevention efforts, (2) promot- ners. Increased coordination empowering victims. of speech. The 12 workshop ing awareness of TFA among among law enforcement, participants, who were selected criminal justice practitioners, lawyers, victims’ rights orga- • Participants agreed that based on their expertise about deterrence must be at the (3) improving criminal justice nizations, and service pro- and experience with TFA, core of efforts to address TFA practices and policies for viders would encourage TFA comprised three researchers, and they highly prioritized addressing TFA, and (4) miti- victims to come forward two law enforcement officials, with their cases and would needs related to deterrence. gating harm and empowering three representatives of victim empower them to make Statutes that criminalize TFA TFA victims. In this report, services and advocacy organi- decisions about what path of behaviors might serve as a we discuss the 21 high-priority deterrent for some types of zations, and four legal profes- recourse (i.e., criminal, civil, needs that emerged through TFA perpetrators, although sionals (one judge, two federal or otherwise) to take. our ranking exercise (see research is needed to better trial attorneys, and one private Table 1) and provide additional • Criminal justice practitio- understand TFA perpetrators attorney). Topics discussed context based on participant ners often lack the tools— and the effectiveness of deter- by participants included the both investigative and rence approaches. discussions. 3 INTRODUCTION PARTICIPANTS Although the growing prevalence of digital technologies has afforded many benefits, it also has provided new media for Elisa D’Amico harmful and abusive behaviors. Websites, social media plat- Cyber Civil Rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silenced by Free Speech: How Cyberabuse Affects Debate and Democracy
    Silenced by Free Speech: How cyberabuse affects debate and democracy Chapter in: Rethinking Cybercrime, Palgrave Macmillan. In press, publication date January 2017 Editors: Tim Owen, Wayne Noble, Faye Speed The early days of the internet promised much. Posting online seemed to offer a freedom from expectation and prejudice. In the words of the New Yorker cartoon, on the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog. We believed nobody knew your gender, age or race either. Your beauty or lack of it was of no account, your mind was disembodied, pure spirit, freed from the hidebound judgements of society. You could remove the mask you wear every day, revealing your true nature online to other disembodied spirits in a way that you never could to your family or colleagues. Perhaps you would find a new community to live in online, a community that thinks and feels as you do. Or instead of revealing yourself, you could create a new self. You could play with your identity more easily than playing with your hair colour, you could have a whole wardrobe of new selves if you want them. The internet offered freedom from the space constraints and word counts of newspapers, as well as from their gatekeepers, political stances and editorial guidelines. Here, anyone could be their own publisher for free, and could be heard all over the world without having their opinions edited down to fit a hole at the bottom of a column or a gap in a 90-second feature. You can’t fill the internet, so you could say everything you always wanted to say, as many times as you like.
    [Show full text]
  • Civility, Safety & Interaction Online
    Civility, Safety & Interaction Online February 2020 1 Study Methodology Adults 18-74, Teens 13-17 The 2019 report is based on the views of 12,520 14-minute Web survey adults and teens questioned across 25 countries Interviews conducted May 1-31, 2019 Argentina 502 Belgium 501 Brazil 502 Canada 500 Chile 503 Colombia 502 France 502 Germany 501 Hungary 500 India 502 Indonesia 501 Ireland 500 Italy 500 Malaysia 500 Mexico 500 Netherlands 504 Peru 500 Poland 500 Russia 500 Singapore 500 South Africa 500 Turkey 500 United Kingdom 500 Countries in Bold United States 500 new in 2019 Vietnam 500 2 42,000+ Interviews since 2016 25 Countries 21 Online Risks 2019 22 Countries 21 Online Risks 2018 23 Countries 2017 20 Online Risks 14 Countries 17 Online Risks 2016 3 3 Key Research Questions Core Trends New questions Digital Civility Index Current & future state of digital civility Sources of online risk Consumer’s aspirations for digital civility Pain caused by online risks Topics that generate uncivil behavior Consequences & Actions taken The number of times a risk has occurred Know where to find help 4 The Rising Tide of Incivility Pessimism and Hope The Digital Civility Index increased 4-points to 70%. About half of the twenty-five country DCI scores rose significantly, with fifteen countries registering their worst DCI since the study began in 2016. Many countries in the study have seen a rise of populist movements or politicians who employ incendiary rhetoric, fueling confrontational discourse that extends into the online world. Nearly four in ten adults said politics was at the center of rude, uncivil or abusive interactions online.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls
    CYBER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS A WORLD-WIDE WAKE-UP CALL 2015 Photo credits:Shutterstock A REPORT BY THE UN BROADBAND COMMISSION FOR DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP ON BROADBAND AND GENDER CYBER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS: A WORLD-WIDE WAKE-UP CALL Acknowledgements This Report has been written collaboratively, drawing on insights and rich contributions from a range of Commissioners and Expert Members of the Working Group on Broadband and Gender. It has been researched and compiled by lead author Nidhi Tandon, assisted by Shannon Pritchard, with editorial inputs by teams from UN Women, UNDP and ITU. Design concepts were developed by Céline Desthomas of ITU. We wish to thank the following people for their contributions and kind review and comments (listed in alphabetical order of institution, followed by alphabetical order of surname): Dafne Sabanes Plou, Jac sm Kee and Chat Garcia Ramilo (APC); Dr Nancy Hafkin; Minerva Novero- Belec (UNDP); Corat Suniye Gulser (UNESCO); Jennifer Breslin and team (UN Women); Samia Melhem and team (World Bank). About the Commission The Broadband Commission for Digital Development was launched by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in response to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s call to step up efforts to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Established in May 2010, the Commission unites top industry executives with government leaders, thought leaders and policy pioneers and international agencies and organizations concerned with development. The Broadband Commission embraces a range of different perspectives in a multi-stakeholder approach to promoting the roll-out of broadband, as well as providing a fresh approach to UN and business engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Senate Passes Anti-Doxing Legislation
    OREGON SENATE DEMOCRATS Salem, Oregon Oregon State Legislature PRESS RELEASE June 7, 2021 CONTACT: Amanda Kraus, 503-986-1074 [email protected] Oregon Senate Passes Anti-Doxing Legislation SALEM – The Oregon Senate passed House Bill 3047 today, a bill to provide a civil remedy to a person who has experienced “doxing.” Doxing is a general term used to describe a situation in which someone deliberately shares another individual’s private information on the internet with an intent to incite harassment. “Throughout the past year we’ve seen a renewed effort of individuals and communities making their voices heard to call out racist systems and improve police accountability,” said Senator James I. Manning Jr. (D-Eugene), who carried House Bill 3047. “We have also seen the astounding efforts of our local journalists on the ground – sometimes in precarious situations to provide thorough reporting on these events, even during a public health crisis.” “Unfortunately, we have also seen people exercising hate and harassment against those with different views. Publishing a person’s private information online implicitly encourages hate and harassment against those individuals. It’s happened to my colleagues in the Legislature, it’s happened to teachers exercising their right as independent individuals to peacefully assemble and it affects safety as well as a person’s ability to earn a living,” added Senator Manning. “Doxing is a tool used to hurt. House Bill 3047 will ensure those who choose to cause that hurt know they can be held accountable and will give tools to victims of this bullying tool to seek financial remedy.” The bill allows an individual to sue for damages when someone deliberately releases a person’s private information online, such as work address or personal email, with the intent to incite harassment if their information is released without consent, and sharing that information results or could result in stalking, harassment, or injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Harassment and Bullying Prevention Policy
    Sexual Harassment and Bullying Prevention Policy Purpose: The Sacramento Gay Men’s Chorus (SGMC) is committed to providing an environment that is safe and welcoming, and free from all forms of conduct that can be considered discriminatory, intimidating, or disruptive to Chorus functions, including behavior defined as sexual harassment or bullying. General Policy: During SGMC functions, Chorus singing members, non-singing members, volunteers, employees, vendors, contractors, and Board members (all of which are included hereafter in the term “members”) shall maintain safe, enjoyable and welcoming spaces by showing respect in their actions and words. Outside of SGMC functions, members shall interact with each other in ways that will preserve a safe, enjoyable, and welcoming space at SGMC functions. When making public statements about SGMC, members shall express themselves in ways that represent the organization as a safe, enjoyable, and welcoming space. SGMC recognizes that the culture of LGBTQIA+ people includes awareness and acceptance of sexual expression, gender identity, and social and political activism that is different than traditional “heteronormative” culture. Thus, during interactions between SGMC members, or when engaging the public on behalf of SGMC, topics of conversation, humor, and expressions of camaraderie may include sexual and political overtones that reflect the culture, rather than being an attempt to harass or bully someone. SGMC expects that members will interact with each other, but only to the degree that all parties in an interaction are comfortable. During SGMC functions, members support each other musically, and participate in conversation, expressions of friendship, joking, physical touch, and other signs of camaraderie. Outside of SGMC functions, SGMC neither promotes nor limits interactions between members, but will intervene in the context of a chorus function if those interactions affect the environment of a SGMC function.
    [Show full text]
  • Staying Safe Online: Gender and Safety on the Internet
    MEDITERRANEAN INSTITUTE OF GENDER STUDIES (MIGS) Staying Safe Online: Gender and Safety on the Internet Experiences of Young Women and Men in Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus November 2014 Staying Safe Online: Gender and Safety on the Internet © 2014, Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies, all rights reserved. 46 Makedonitissas Ave. P.O. Box 24005, Nicosia 1703 Cyprus Authors: Elena Rousou, Christina Kaili Edited by Susana Elisa Pavlou Published by the Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies (M.I.G.S.) on December 2014 Coordinated by Gender Studies, o.p.s., Czech Republic Partner Organisations Feminoteka , Poland ProFem, Czech Republic Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies (M.I.G.S.), Cyprus This publication has been produced with the financial support of the DAPHNE III Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies (M.I.G.S.) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. 1 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 SCOPE, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................... 4 1.2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting Online Harassment and Abuse Reporting Policies
    crafting online harassment and abuse reporting policies Amanda Levendowski Internet Law & Policy Foundry Fellow Data & Society Databite December 17, 2015 1 CRAFTING HARP what’s the problem? 2 CRAFTING HARP “We suck at dealing with abuse and trolls on the platform and we’ve sucked at it for years. It’s no secret and the rest of the world talks about it every day. We lose core user after core user by not addressing simple trolling issues that they face every day.” - Dick Costolo, CEO of Twitter 3 CRAFTING HARP 40% 4 CRAFTING HARP According to a 2014 survey, over 40% of online adults report being targets one or more types of harassment: called offensive names 7% purposefully embarassed 8% 27% stalked 6% 8% sexually harassed 22% physically threatened sustained harassment Maeve Duggan, Online Harassment, PEW Research Internet Project (Oct. 22, 2014), http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/ 5 CRAFTING HARP WHO 6 CRAFTING HARP There may be a correlation between the types of people who engage in harassment and where that behavior is likely to occur: co-worker 7% former partner 10% family 12% friend 23% acquaintance 24% unknown 26% stranger 38% 7 CRAFTING HARP WHERE 8 CRAFTING HARP There may be a correlation between the types of people who engage in harassment and where that behavior is likely to occur: online dating site 6% co-worker 7% forum 10% former partner 10% family 12% email 16% friend 23% online gaming 16% acquaintance 24% the comments 22% unknown 26% stranger 38% social media 66% 9 platform permeability matrix CRAFTING
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Doxxing, Swatting and the New Trends in Online Harassment 22 April 2015, by Andrew Quodling
    Doxxing, swatting and the new trends in online harassment 22 April 2015, by Andrew Quodling citizens about "swatting" (see below) since 2008. It has become common to see articles about how these attacks have affected politicians (both Republican and Democrat in the US), celebrities, journalists, businesses, video game streamers and public servants. What is doxxing? Doxxing – named for "documents" or "docs" – is the act of release of someone's personal and/or When the SWAT team bursts into your bedroom, it’s not identifiable information without their consent. This only unpleasant but potentially deadly. Credit: Jason can include things like their full legal name, social Eppink/Flickr, CC BY security numbers, home or work addresses and contact information. There's no set format for a "dox"; the doxxer simply Imagine this: there's a knock at your door. "Pizza publishes whatever information they've managed to delivery!" It's the fifth time in the last hour that turn up in their searches. Sometimes this even you've had to say to a delivery-person: "No, I really includes the names and details of their target's didn't order anything." That's irritating. family or close friends. Half an hour later, there's another noise at the As a tactic of harassment, doxxing serves two door. This time it's forced open as your house is purposes: it intimidates the people targeted by stormed by the heavily armed and aggressive invading and disrupting their expectations of special response unit of your local police force. privacy; and it provides an avenue for the They're responding to a tip off that warned them of perpetuation of that person's harassment by a hostage situation at your address.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Social Engineering Attacks: Issues and Recommendations
    (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2020 Coronavirus Social Engineering Attacks: Issues and Recommendations Ahmed Alzahrani Faculty of Computing and Information Technology King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah Saudia Arabia Abstract—During the current coronavirus pandemic, Social engineering attacks fall into four types: physical, cybercriminals are exploiting people’s anxieties to steal technical, social, and socio-technical [3]. In general, there are confidential information, distribute malicious software, perform two methods of social engineering attacks, human-based and ransomware attacks and use other social engineering attacks. computer-based. Human-based social engineering requires The number of social engineering attacks is increasing day by interaction with humans to gain the desired information. day due to people's failure to recognize the attacks. Therefore, Impersonation is the most common approach for this type, via there is an urgent need for solutions to help people understand a phone call or text message (see Fig. 2), online, or even in social engineering attacks and techniques. This paper helps person. Computer-based social engineering uses computer individuals and industry by reviewing the most common software to try to gain the required information. This attack coronavirus social engineering attacks and provides includes sending scam emails asking the user to open an recommendations for responding to such an attack. The paper also discusses the psychology behind social engineering and attachment to check the latest statistics about coronavirus or introduces security awareness as a solution to reduce the risk of information about coronavirus safety measures (see Fig. 1). social engineering attacks. Cybercriminals can also create a fake website to trick users into downloading malware to steal users' credentials and online Keywords—Social engineering; coronavirus; COVID-19; banking information.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Cyberbullying?
    Cyberbullying Contents 1. What Is Cyberbullying 2. The Dangers Of Cyberbullying 3. How Is Cyberbullying Different From Regular Bullying 4. How To Tell If Your Child Is Being Cyberbullied 5. How To Tell If Your Child Is Cyberbullying Someone Else 6. Why Do Children Cyberbully 7. What To Do If Your Child Is Cyberbullying 8. What To Do If Your Child Is Being Cyberbullied 9. Parents Top 10 Questions About Cyberbullying 10. Statistics Of Cyberbullying 2015 Page 2 www.keepchildrensafeonline.com 1. What Is Cyberbullying? The definition of Cyberbullying is ‘the use of electronic communication to bully a person, typically by sending 1 messages of an intimidating or threatening nature’. As the definition suggests, Cyberbullying can take many forms. Just about any type of electronic communication can be used to bully or intimidate somebody, whether it’s via texting, email, instant messengers, chat rooms, multiplayer games and so forth. Here is a list of some (but by no means all) of the possible sources of Cyberbullying: • Texting • Phone Calls • Social Media • Chatrooms • Forums • Messaging & Photo Apps like WhatsApp and Snapchat • Online Multiplayer 1 Oxford English Dictionary Page 3 www.keepchildrensafeonline.com Of course, it can be tricky to know what is and isn’t Cyberbullying, as sometimes children say mean things to each other online, but one wouldn’t consider it any more than childish name-calling. The key distinction to make is that Cyberbullying is generally characterised by repeatedly causing harm, whether that is through repeated incidents or a single malicious incident that has lasting repercussions. Some examples of Cyberbullying include: Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is where somebody ‘stalks’ the victim online, usually sending multiple messages or just making it clear that they are watching the victim’s online life.
    [Show full text]