Rriving 6 September

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rriving 6 September MISCELLANEOUS PAPER GL-82-8 GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGES OBSERVED IN THE SOVIET UNION, 6-29 SEPTEMBER 1979 by Paul A. Gilbert Geotechnical Laboratory U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station P. O. Box 631, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180 August 1982 Final Report Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited .W34m GL-82-8 1982 prepared for Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army Washington, D. C. 20314 Under Civil Works Work Unit 31173, Task 30 LIBRARY. NOV 0 8 W - Buteau oi Reclamation ripnu0fe Colpffiin Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. The findings in this report are not to be construed as an officia Department of the Army position unless so designated, by other authorized documents. The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. ïj? BUREAU OF RECLAMATION DENVER LIBRARY v £ « 92016795 Unr.1 a s s i fie ri Ci T20]ib7T5 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered) 'V»«a ' READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM n 1. R E P O R T N U M B ER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER Miscellaneous ,Paper GL-82-8 /j 4. • T I T L E (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGES OBSERVED IN THE SOVIET r ) UNION, 6-29 SEPTEMBER 1979 ( Final report J^ ~6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTHOR*» 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER*» Paul A. Gilbert^ 9. PEWp^MING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK A R E A & WORK UNIT NUMBERS U. S.*Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station^, Geotechnical Laboratory Civil Works Work Unit 31173, P. 0. Box 631, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180 ¿Task 30 11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE t Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army ^August 1982 Washington, D. C. 20314 13. NUMBER OF P^LGES 69 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS*?/ different from Controlling Office) 15. S E C U R IT Y C L A S S , (of this report) Unclassified 15a. DECL ASSI FI CATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE 16. D IS T R IB U T IO N S T A T E M E N T (of thie Report) Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 17. D IS T R IB U T IO N S T A T E M E N T (of the abstract entered in Block 20, it different from Report) 18. S U P P L E M E N T A R Y N O T E S Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Va. 22151. 19. K E Y W ORDS (Continue on reverse side if necessary and identify by block number) Centrifuges Soil mechanics Soil tests (Laboratory) 2Qv ABSTRACT fCootCout eta re v e rse alxts if necessary and identify by block number) In 1979 a team of U. S. geotechnical engineers visited the U.S.S.R. to observe demonstrations of centrifuge devices and to discuss soil modeling tech­ niques with representatives of the Soviet Union. This report presents details of the visit and an assessment of centrifuge modeling research in the Soviet Union. FORM EDITION OF 1 MOV 65 IS OBSOLETE DD , JAM 73 1473 Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered) SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfWTfn D a ta B n terme/) SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEflWjen Data Entered) PREFACE In accordance with the Protocol signed in Washington, D. C., on 28 March 1977 by the Cochairmen of the U. S./USSR Joint Working Group 16.05 "Building for Extreme Climates and Unusual Geologic Conditions," representatives of the U. S. participated in a study visit to the Soviet Union during the period 6-29 September 1979. This report was published under Civil Works Work Unit 31173 "Special Studies for Civil Works Soils Problems," Task 30, "Centrifuge Modeling for Geotechnical Applications," for the Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army. Special thanks are given to the Russian interpreters Ms. Natasha A. Nelubina, Mr. Valarie A. Alexandrovitch, Mr. Yuri Ivanov, and Mrs. Gala Barvasho, without whose help the exchange would not have been possible. Special thanks are also given to the companion to and organizer for the U. S. team, Mr. S. V. Dovnarovich. This report was written by Mr. Paul A. Gilbert, Soil Mechanics Division (SMD), Geotechnical Laboratory (GL), U. S. Army Engineer Water­ ways Experiment Station (WES), under the general supervision of Mr. Clifford L. McAnear, Chief, SMD, and Dr. William F. Marcuson III, Chief, GL. The Commander and Director of WES during the preparation of this report was COL Tilford C. Creel, CE. Mr. Fred R. Brown was Technical Director. 1 Contents Page P r e f a c e ......................... .............. .............. 1 Introduction............... ....................................... 3 Background......... ....................................... 4 Program and Itinerary ........ ........ .......... 4 Centrifuges Observed in the Soviet Union. .... 5 Hydroproject. ........ .................... 5 NIIOSP. .......................................... 7 UkrNIIproject ........................................... 10 Soviet Soil Testing Equipment ..... ........................... 14 General Impressions ......................... 15 Summary Remarks .................................................. 17 Conclusions . ..................................................... 18 References......................................................... 20 APPENDIX A: SCHEDULE AT HYDROPROJECT........... ........... .. A1 APPENDIX B: LIST OF ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS AT HYDROPROJECT . B1 APPENDIX C: SCHEDULE AT UkrNIIproject (IN RU S S I A N ) ............. Cl APPENDIX D: SYNOPSIS OF VISIT................................... D1 APPENDIX E: ACTUAL SCHEDULE OF EVENTS......................... El APPENDIX F: APPENDICES D AND E IN RUSSIAN...................... FI APPENDIX G: REFERENCE LIST, ARTICLES RELATED TO RAILROAD ENGINEERING SOIL MECHANICS (IN RUSSIAN).............. G1 2 GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGES OBSERVED IN THE SOVIET UNION, 6-29 SEPTEMBER 1979 Introduction 1. During the period 6-29 September 1979, a team of U. S. geotech­ nical engineers visited the U.S.S.R. to observe demonstrations of centri­ fuge devices and to discuss soil modeling techniques with representatives of the Soviet Union. The visit was conducted in accordance with the March 1977 Protocol under Working Group 10.05 Project 2 entitled "Centri­ fuge Modeling Used for Foundation Design." 2. The U. S. team participating in the visit and the agency af­ filiation of the members are as follows: a_. Paul A. Gilbert, Research Civil Engineer, Geotechnical Laboratory, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Id. James A. Cheney, Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis, Calif. 3. Members of the U. S. team departed the U. S. on 4 September from their individual cities and met in London, England, on 5 September from which they continued on to Moscow, arriving 6 September. They were met at the airport by A. A. Vaselevskii and Candidate of Science (Cand. Sc.) S. V. Dovnorovich, the technical contact who served as companion to and organizer for the U. S. team. 4. A schedule was given the U. S. team indicating that three in­ stallations were to be visited during the stay, two in Moscow and one in Kiev. The U. S. team noted that a visit to the installation at Baku in the Province of Azerbaijan was not included in the itinerary and re­ quested that it be added. The request was denied with the explanation that enough would be learned from visits to the installations on the schedule. 5. The three installations scheduled to be visited were: a.. Hydroproject Institute— an installation dealing with the investigation, survey, and design, as well as testing and analysis associated with water power and water resources in the U.S.S.R. 3 b_. NIIOSP, Research Institute of Bases and Underground Structures— an installation dealing with experimental and theoretical problems in basic soil mechanics, foundation design, performance and evaluation, stabilization of soils, problems in soil dynamics, as well as theoretical and ex­ perimental investigations of the behavior of frozen soils. c.. UkrNIIproject— an installation dealing with soil mechanics problems associated with the mining industry in the Ukraine. Background 6. The technique of centrifuge modeling was originally proposed in the U. S. by P. B. Bucky in the early 1930fs, but the concept was not exploited for geotechnical uses by U. S. engineers. The Soviets, how­ ever, picked up the technique and have used it with apparent success for almost 50 years. According to sources at NIIOSP, there are approximately 50 centrifuges with a rotation radius of at least 1 m in the Soviet Union today; twelve of the devices are currently functional and operating. Three centrifuges were observed during this visit, two in Moscow at Hydroproject and NIIOSP and one in Kiev at UkrNIIproject. Two of these centrifuges were operating; the device at NIIOSP was inactive at the time of the visit because of the recent death of the researcher, N. Ya. Rudnitsky. Program and Itinerary 7. Except for NIIOSP, each installation visited gave the U. S. team a tentative schedule of events. These schedules are included in the appendices. Appendix A shows the proposed schedule at Hydroproject, Appendix B shows the list of engineers and scientists at Hydroproject scheduled to meet with the U. S. team, Appendix C shows the proposed schedule (in Russian) at UkrNIIproject, Appendix D is a synopsis of the visit prepared by the Soviet hosts, Appendix E is the actual schedule of events of the visit also prepared by the Soviet hosts, and Appendix F is a copy of Appendices D and E in the Russian language; copies of these 4 documents were given to the U. S. team. Centrifuges Observed in the Soviet Union Hydroproject 8. The centrifuge at Hydroproject was perhaps the most capable and well instrumented device observed during the visit. Its operation was directed by Cand. Sc. (Eng.) Senior Scientific Worker of Rock and Earthfill Dams and Foundation Department (R&EDFD) V.
Recommended publications
  • Soviet Technological Projects and Technological Aid in Africa and Cuba, 1960S-1980S
    Elena Kochetkova, David Damtar, Lilia Boliachevets, Polina Slyusarchuk, Julia Lajus SOVIET TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS AND TECHNOLOGICAL AID IN AFRICA AND CUBA, 1960S-1980S BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: HUMANITIES WP BRP 143/HUM/2017 This Working Paper is an output of a research project implemented within NRU HSE’s Annual Thematic Plan for Basic and Applied Research. Any opinions or claims contained in this Working Paper do not necessarily reflect the views of HSE. Elena Kochetkova1, David Damtar,2 Lilia Boliachevets,3 Polina Slyusarchuk4 and Julia Lajus5 6 SOVIET TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS AND TECHNOLOGICAL AID IN AFRICA AND CUBA, 1960S- 1980S7 8 This paper examines Soviet development projects in African countries and Cuba during the Cold War. We analyze types of projects led by Soviet specialists and engage into the question of how Soviets, both leadership and engineers, viewed their roles and impacts as well as challenges on African territory and Cuba. In so doing, this paper analyzes differences and similarities in Soviet penetration to lands with newly established governments in Africa and Cuba. JEL Classification: N60, N67, N97. Keywords: technology, technological aid, Soviet Union, Africa, Cuba, decolonization. 1 National Research University Higher School of Economics. Laboratory for Environmental and Technological History. Department of History. E-mail: [email protected] 2 National Research University Higher School of Economics. Laboratory for Environmental and Technological History. Department of History. E-mail: «[email protected]» 3 National Research University Higher School of Economics. Department of History. E-mail: [email protected] 4 National Research University Higher School of Economics. Department of History. E-mail: [email protected] 5 National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Good and Bad Dams
    Latin America and Caribbean Region 1 Sustainable Development Working Paper 16 Public Disclosure Authorized Good Dams and Bad Dams: Environmental Criteria for Site Selection of Hydroelectric Projects November 2003 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized George Ledec Public Disclosure Authorized Juan David Quintero The World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Region Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Department (LCSES) Latin America and the Caribbean Region Sustainable Development Working Paper No. 16 Good Dams and Bad Dams: Environmental Criteria for Site Selection of Hydroelectric Projects November 2003 George Ledec Juan David Quintero The World Bank Latin America and the Caribbean Region Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Sector Management Unit George Ledec has worked with the World Bank since 1982, and is presently Lead Ecologist for the Environmen- tally and Socially Sustainable Development Unit (LCSES) of the World Bank’s Latin America and Caribbean Re- gional Office. He specializes in the environmental assessment of development projects, with particular focus on biodiversity and related conservation concerns. He has worked extensively with the environmental aspects of dams, roads, oil and gas, forest management, and protected areas, and is one of the main authors of the World Bank’s Natural Habitats Policy. Dr. Ledec earned a Ph.D. in Wildland Resource Science from the University of California-Berkeley, a Masters in Public Affairs from Princeton University, and a Bachelors in Biology and Envi- ronmental Studies from Dartmouth College. Juan David Quintero joined the World Bank in 1993 and is presently Lead Environmental Specialist for LCSES and Coordinator of the Bank’s Latin America and Caribbean Quality Assurance Team, which monitors compli- ance with environmental and social safeguard policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 6. Flood Risk Management September 29, 2016 Room 424
    Session 6. Flood risk management September 29, 2016 Room 424 6.1 Theories, methods and technologies of hydrological forecasts 14.00–14.201. The new paradigm in hydrological forecasting (ensemble predictions and their improving based on assimilation of observation data) Lev Kuchment, Victor Demidov (RAS Institute of Water Problem, Russia) 14.20–14.402. The hydrological forecast models of the Siberian rivers water regime Dmitry Burakov (Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, Krasnoyarsk Center for Hydrometeorology and Monitoring of the Environment, Russia), Evgeniya Karepova (Institute of Computational Modeling, Siberian Branch of RAS, Russia) 14.40–15.003. Short-term forecasts method of water inflow into Bureyskaya reservoir Yury Motovilov (RAS Institute of Water Problems, Russia), Victor Balyberdin (SKM Market Predictor, Russia), Boris Gartsman, Alexander Gelfan (RAS Institute of Water Problems, Russia), Timur Khaziakhmetov (RusHydro Group, Russia), Vsevolod Moreydo (RAS Institute of Water Problems, Russia), Oleg Sokolov (Far Eastern Regional Hydrometeorological Research Institute, Russia) 15.00–15.204. Forecast of spring floods on the upper Ob river Alexander Zinoviev, Vladimir Galаkhov, Konstantin Koshelev (Institute of Water and Environmental Problems, Siberian Branch of RAS, Russia) 15.20–15.405. Regional hydrological model: the infrastructure and framework for hydrological prediction and forecasting Andrei Bugaets (RAS Institute of Water Problems, Far Eastern Regional Research Hydrometeorological Institute, Russia), Boris Gartsman
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th International Conference DEBRIS FLOWS
    First announcement 6th International Conference DEBRIS FLOWS: DISASTERS, RISK, FORECAST, PROTECTION Dushanbe – Khorog, Tajikistan September 21-27, 2020 Конфронси байналхалқии Шашум 6-я международная "Селҳо: конференция Фалокатҳо, Хатар, Пешгӯи, СЕЛЕВЫЕ ПОТОКИ: Муҳофизат" КАТАСТРОФЫ, РИСК, ПРОГНОЗ, Душанбе – Хоруғ, Тоҷикистон, ЗАЩИТА 21-27 сентябри соли 2020 Душанбе – Хорог, Таджикистан 21-27 сентября 2020 г. www.debrisflow.ru/en/df20 6th International Conference “DEBRIS FLOWS: DISASTERS, RISK, FORECAST, PROTECTION” (Dushanbe – Khorog, Tajikistan, September 21-27, 2020) The Debris Flow Association, the National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan, and the Aga Khan Agency for Habitat invite you and your colleagues to participate in the 6th International Conference on Debris Flows: Disasters, Risks, Forecast, Protection which will take place September 21-27, 2020 in Dushanbe and Khorog, Tajikistan. Debris flows in mountain regions cause significant damage for the economy and often lead to victims among local people. To solve the debris flow problems, experts from different countries are required to work together. The conferences on Debris Flows: Disasters, Risks, Forecast, Protection are among the forms of the international cooperation. This conference in Tajikistan is the sixth, it continues a series of conferences with the same name held in Pyatigorsk (2008), Moscow (2012), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk (2014), Irkutsk and Arshan (2016), Tbilisi (2018). The Conference is held with the participation of government ministries of Tajikistan, international
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement, Displacement and Agrarian Change in Northern Uplands of Vietnam
    RESETTLEMENT, DISPLACEMENT AND AGRARIAN CHANGE IN NORTHERN UPLANDS OF VIETNAM NGA THI VIET DAO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GEOGRAPHY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO July 2012 ©Nga Dao2012 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-92814-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-92814-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement of Consultant Annexes
    PUBLIC ANNEXES Annex 1 Total Value and Number of Consultancy Contract Awards by Funding Source (Technical Cooperation Funds, Bank Budget and Loan Funded) Annex 2 a. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards by Consultant Selection Method (Value and Number) b. Consultancy Contract Awards by Contract Type Annex 3 Top-10 TC Funded Contracts under Section 5.9 of the Bank’s PP&R, 2014 Annex 4 a. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards Funded by TC and Special Funds by Funding Agreement b. Distribution of Contracts funded from “Tied” TC Funds by Donor Country, 2014 Annex 5 Competitively Awarded Assignments Restricted to Consultants from TC Donor Country, 2014 Annex 6 a. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards by Consultant Nationality (Value and Number) b. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards by Consultant Nationality and Selection Method (Value and Number) c. Consultants’ Participation in Competitive Selection by Bidders’ Nationality for Consultancy Contract Awards by TC Team in 2014 d. Contract Awards for Top 35 Firms (Value and Number) Annex 7 Consultants from EBRD Countries of Operations in 2014 and 2013 Annex 8 a. Total Value and Number of Consultancy Contract Awards by Contracting Department b. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards by Country of Operations (Value and Number) c. 2014 Consultancy Contract Awards by EBRD Department (Value and Number) Annex 9 Framework Agreements Awarded in 2014 Annex 10 Framework Contracts Awarded in 2014 Annex 11 a. Call-Off Notices greater than €75,000 Awarded under Framework Agreements, 2014 b. Top-10 Firms by Number of Call-off Notices
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Evaluation 2020
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 116th meeting Geneva, 17 May 2021 Item 6 Informal Document No. 2021/10 Annual report on evaluation 2020 (For information) Informal document No. 2021/10 Note by the Secretariat 1. INTRODUCTION 1. The present report is submitted to the Executive Committee (EXCOM) for information. EXCOM requested the Secretariat to prepare an annual report on evaluation at the ninety-first Meeting on 24 March 20171, beginning with an annual report for 2017. The purpose of the report is to inform the UNECE member States on evaluation efforts conducted during the past year, future evaluation plans, the status and information on completed, ongoing evaluations, and changes generated by the implementation of relevant recommendations. 2. As per the UNECE Evaluation Policy, the Secretariat undertakes evaluations for the purpose of learning, as well as to improve the future work of the organization. The present report consolidates and analyses the outcome of all evaluations conducted in 2020 to support this objective. The Executive Secretary, through the Programme Management Unit (PMU), ensures the consistent application of evaluation norms and standards across UNECE, and ensures the application of the key outcomes of evaluations into the future planning of the UNECE programme of work. 3. The analysis is based on the results of all evaluations conducted and/or commissioned by UNECE, relevant external and/or system-wide evaluations, and the UN System Wide Action Plan (UN-SWAP) to implement the Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) Policy on gender 2 equality and the empowerment of women. 2. BACKGROUND ON EVALUATION IN THE UN SECRETARIAT 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Document No.2 Agenda Item 6 (C) Presented by Belarus
    Informal document No.2 Agenda item 6 (c) Presented by Belarus Summary report on establishment of “the Daugava - Dnieper waterway link and, as an option, its connection to the White Sea Nowadays there’s sustainable tendency in the world economy to share the labour and to be specialised in certain fields of production. Under such circumstances special attention is paid to the transport. Its basic mission is to fill geographic gap between the sources of mineral resources, industries and their consumers, for the supplier and the customer could exchange goods and services to mutual benefit. Economic growth after the WW II has facilitated development of transport and in particular of the rail and road ones. It resulted in overloading of European countries with means of transport which negatively affect ecology. Due to this growth the development of alternative to the road and rail transport is getting urgent. At recent European forums it was stressed that priority should be given to inland shipping because of its ecological and economic advantages over other types of transport and due to overloading of European transport infrastructure. The tasks which have been set forth by them could be solved in two ways that is by increasing traffic capacity of existing European infrastructure and by creating new transit waterways. Based on the study of cargo flows the priority should be given to transit waterways which would link the Baltic and the Black Seas. There are various options of the link. In the file attached to this report there are comparison data on the Pripyat-the Nieman and the Dnieper - the Dvina options of the waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Eastern Europe Hydropower Forum 3Rd Eastern Europe Hydropower Forum
    3rd Eastern Europe Hydropower Forum 3rd Eastern Europe Hydropower Forum Concept Session I: Overview of the region and country reports (UNIDO Report, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Macedonia) Session II: Experiences and best practice in hydropower development within the region: challenges, tasks and investment opportunities (erection & rehabilitation contracts, hidden hydropower potential) Session III: Plenary Discussion The future for Hydropower in Eastern and South Eastern Europe (existing potential and new opportunities following from national climate & energy policies) European subregions according to the UN geoscheme Eastern Europe in the Salzburger Hydropower Debate Subregions EE9: Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine EE10 = EE9 + Russian Federation Baltic States Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania Western Balkans Albania, Greece, Bosnia&Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Montenegro, Northern Macedonia, Serbia Caucasus Republics Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia Topography & rivers Danube (technical potential 43 TWh/a) Volga (economic potential 42 TWh/a) Dnieper Pechora, Northern Dvina, Kama, Terek and Sulak Daugava (Western Dvina), Nemunas Vistula, Oder and Elbe Vah, Sava Prut and Dniester Eastern Europe in the Salzburger Hydropower Debate Item EE 21 Europe % Caucasus Population, mln 310 014 710 491 41,8 % 13 320 Surf. area, thousand km2 6 292 8 897 70,2 % 156 GDP, billion € 3 307 19 672 16,8 % 51 Installed power, TW Total 368 1 386 26,5 % 12 Hydropower 65 221 29,3 % 4 Generation, TWh Total 1 445 4 684
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Economic Analysis of Power Sector Projects
    99506 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Volume 2: Guidelines for Economic Analysis of Power Sector Projects TECHNICAL NOTES September 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Economic Analysis Guidance Note and this Annex Volume of Technical Notes were prepared under the Direction of Vivien Foster (Practice Manager, PMSO) and Gabriela Elizondo Azuela (Task Team Leader, PMSO), and guided by an Advisory Committee that included Jamie Fergusson, Brian Casabianca (CNGSF), Kseniya Lvovsky (GENDR), Wendy Hughes, Todd Johnson, Fanny Missfeldt-Ringius, Demetrios Papathanasiou (GEEDR), and Grzegorz Peszko (GCCPT). The peer reviewers were Morgan Bazilian, Richard Spencer, Ashish Khanna (GEEDR) and Efstratios Tavoulereas (IFC). Important contributions and suggestions were made by Marianne Fay (GCCPT), Michael Toman (DECEE), Gevorg Sargsyan, Deb Chattopadhyay, Natsuko Toba (GEEDR), Laura Bonzanigo, Julie Rozenberg, and Adrien Vogt-Schilb (GCCPT). The report was prepared by Peter Meier (Consultant). September 2015 i CONTENTS Part I: Basic Concepts ................................................................................................... 1 C1 Costs .................................................................................................................. 1 C2 Benefits .............................................................................................................17 C3 Externalities .....................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Khudoni Hydro Power Project (702 MW)
    Khudoni Hydro Power Project (702 MW) Scoping Document October 2011 Table of contents Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................4 1.0 Description of the Khudoni Hydro Power Project .............................................................................5 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Project Development ....................................................................................................................5 1.3 Need for Project ............................................................................................................................7 1.4 Project proponent .........................................................................................................................7 1.5 Main technical characteristics of the Khudoni Hydro Power Project ...........................................8 1.6 Construction Schedule and costs ............................................................................................... 12 2.0 Alternatives for the Khudoni Hydro Power Project .............................................................................. 13 3.0 ESIA for the Khudoni Hydro Power Project .................................................................................... 20 3.1 ESIA Process ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aswan Dam Construction History Aswan Low
    Aswan Dam The Aswan Dam may refer to either of two dams situated across the Nile River in Aswan, Egypt. Since the 1950s, the name commonly refers to the High Dam, which is the larger and newer of the two. The Old Aswan Dam, or Aswan Low Dam, was first completed in 1902 and then was raised twice, during the British colonial period. Following Egypt's independence from the United Kingdom, the High Dam was constructed between 1960 and 1970. Both projects aimed to increase economic production by regulating the annual riverflooding and providing storage of water for agriculture, and later, to generate hydroelectricity. Both have had significant impact on theeconomy and culture of Egypt. The Old Aswan Dam was built at the former first cataract of the Nile, and is located about 1000 km up-river and 690 km (direct distance) south- southeast of Cairo. The newer Aswan High Dam is located 7.3 km upriver from the older dam. Before the dams were built, the River Nile flooded each year during late summer, as water flowed down the valley from its East Africandrainage basin. These floods brought high water and natural nutrients and minerals that annually enriched the fertile soil along thefloodplain and delta; this made the Nile valley ideal for farming since ancient times. Because floods vary, in high-water years, the wholecrop might be wiped out, while in low-water years widespread drought and famine occasionally occurred. As Egypt's population grew and conditions changed, both a desire and ability developed to control the floods, and thus both protect and support farmland and the economically important cotton crop.
    [Show full text]