DOCSLIB.ORG

Appeals to Authenticity: Discourses on the True Self and the Politics of Identity Construction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appeals to Authenticity: Discourses on the True Self and the Politics of Identity Construction Appeals to Authenticity: Discourses on the True Self and the Politics of Identity Construction By Nina Marie Hagel A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy L. Brown, Chair Professor Sarah S. Song Professor Shannon C. Stimson Professor Hans D. Sluga Summer 2016 Abstract Appeals to Authenticity: Discourses on the True Self and the Politics of Identity Construction by Nina Marie Hagel Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy Brown, Chair My dissertation, Appeals to Authenticity: Discourses on the True Self and the Politics of Identity Construction, examines how appealing to a “true self” may have social and political value, even if such a self does not exist. Across contemporary life, individuals invoke notions of an inner self that has been maimed by oppressive norms and practices, or that would be harmed if it assimilated, conformed, or otherwise departed from who it was. From transgender individuals seeking to become the gender they feel they truly are, to indigenous groups seeking exemptions from equality laws, a variety of groups today cast their political claims in terms of authenticity. However, in the past quarter century, such appeals have been criticized by scholars from across the humanities and social sciences, who fault authenticity for stipulating regulatory notions of group identity, stigmatizing those who fall outside its norms, and relying on untenable notions of selfhood and self-knowledge. Some have even called for abandoning the term. My dissertation responds to these critiques and argues for a renewed appreciation of authenticity in political life. Through an engagement with Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, and writings from American social movements from the sixties and today, I formulate a framework for appealing to the term that departs its problematic ontological grounds and is attuned to its political risks. Each chapter responds to a particular challenge facing such appeals, from the status of the “self” they imply, to their claims of genuine self-knowledge, to the risks of exclusion, and to the ways they can blur the public/private line. In addressing these critiques, I show that there are good reasons to continue to value authenticity: appeals to the term may enable marginalized groups to counter oppressive representations of themselves, mobilize individuals around visions of selfhood and community, facilitate critiques of social norms, and animate practices of resistance. The dissertation begins by addressing those critics who claim that authenticity is too conceptually vague and too politically risky to be useful in pursuing progressive or emancipatory ends, and that political actors would be better served by parsing their claims in terms of related values, such as justice, integrity, or individualism. Chapter one examines how appeals to authenticity in American social movements in the 1960s facilitated critiques of capitalism, racism, and sexism, legitimated historically stigmatized identities, and encouraged marginalized individuals to speak truthfully about their experiences. I show that these effects were more easily elicited by appealing to authenticity than by appealing to related terms, such as sincerity or autonomy. The next chapter responds to criticisms of authenticity’s “depoliticizing” effects 1 through an engagement with the works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The third and fourth chapters look to the works of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, respectively, to address criticisms of the notions of “the self” and “self knowledge” underlying such appeals. In the fifth chapter, I address the tendencies of exclusion and marginalization that have historically attended such appeals by examining recent deployments of authenticity arising in contemporary discourses on transgender. I conclude by examining how two texts responding to the events animating the Black Lives Matter movement, in order to show how discourses on authenticity need not presuppose an essential self or transparent self-knowledge, and need not rely on essentialized notions of “blackness” in order to advance social critiques. My dissertation departs from contemporary philosophical accounts of the value of authenticity, which tend to treat it at an almost exclusively conceptual level. Whether providing an intellectual history, a conceptual analysis, or an exegesis of an early articulator, these thinkers largely focus on what appeals to authenticity mean rather than what they do. As a result, they incompletely answer those critics who are concerned with injuries wrought in pursuit of authenticity—for instance, the tendency to marginalize the experiences of middle-class blacks in definitions of “blackness.” By examining authenticity’s effects, my dissertation responds directly to these critiques, and provides a more complete account of why it continues to compel. I show that invoking authenticity does not always or necessarily give rise to detrimental political effects, and that refraining from such appeals may foreclose the potentially emancipatory futures they can help bring into being. Thus, my dissertation provides a more complete picture of why appeals to authenticity have been politicized, why they continue to compel, and why they need not replicate the injuries and regulation frequently associated with essentialism. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..………ii Introduction: The Politics of Authenticity…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..………1 Chapter 1: Truth, the Self, and Political Critique: Authenticity in 1960s America..……….35 Chapter 2: Between Nature and Artifice: Rousseau and the Roots of Authenticity..………62 Chapter 3: Disassembling the Self: Authenticity After Foucault..…………………………97 Chapter 4: Resignifying Authenticity: Butler’s Conceptions of Truth and the Psyche……136 Chapter 5: Alternative Authenticities: Thinking Transgender Without Essence..…………177 Conclusion: W(h)ither Authenticity? …….…...…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..……….213 Bibliography..….…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..…..….…..…..…..…..…..…..……224 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have benefited enormously from having an intellectually demanding and supportive committee. My deepest gratitude goes to Wendy Brown, whose teaching and whose own work disclosed new worlds for me. I’d like to thank her for everything she’s done to help me develop as a scholar and teacher, and for constantly encouraging me to reach towards something greater. I don’t know where I’d be without her guidance and generosity. Sarah Song read many drafts and outlines over the years, and our conversations decisively shaped the project at key points. I’d like to thank her for all of her feedback, and for her various discussion groups, which were rich sources of intellectual community and enjoyment. My conversations with Shannon Stimson helped sharpen my claims and my thinking, and I am grateful for how demanding and staunchly supportive she’s been. Many thanks go to Hans Sluga, who read the entire manuscript with care, offered key distinctions, and revealed new lines of argument that I hadn’t seen for myself. Eight years ago, one of my teachers told me that if I went to Berkeley, I’d be blessed with great colleagues, and this has proved truer than I could have imagined. Richard Ashcroft, Ali Bond, Quinlan Bowman, Yasmeen Daifallah, Mark Fisher, Tim Fisken, Andrius Galisanka, Katie Heard, Nura Hossainzadeh, Jean-Michel Landry, Paul Martorelli, Sibbyl Nickerson, Tacuma Peters, Ryan Phillips, Nathan Pippenger, Jesse Cordes Selbin, Toby Reiner, Geoff Upton, Elena Wang and Sherry Zaks were all extremely generous with their criticism, encouragement and friendship throughout the years. Berkeley is unimaginable without them. In particular, I am especially lucky to have found in Nura a true friend and confidante. I’d also like to thank Kinch Hoekstra and Daniel Lee for their advice and guidance along the way, and Hanna Pitkin for her ii willingness to teach me how to speak Ordinary, and for the copious feedback she provided on my early chapter drafts. This project has its roots in my undergrad years at Johns Hopkins, where I was incredibly fortunate to find friends and teachers who have continued to read and support my work. I’d like to thank Adam Culver, Simon Glezos, Daniel Levine, Mina Suk, and especially Luke Plotica for their conversations, feedback, and formative impact on my thinking for over the course of a decade. I have an abundance of gratitude for Bill Connolly, who gave me the best possible introduction to political theory, and whose teaching and friendship infuse my thinking to this day. Outside the realms of Berkeley and Hopkins, I am deeply indebted to Ashleigh Campi, Bogdan Popa, Shalini Satkunanandan, George Shulman and Libby Anker for their intellectual engagement, support, and good counsel. E.R. Ramzipoor read this work in its entirety when I needed a fresh pair of eyes, and I am tremendously grateful that she spotted errors in my thinking and grammar. For years, I enjoyed the guidance and good company of Suzan Nunes, who helped me navigate the ins and outs of Berkeley. I continue to be indebted to Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger for her warmth and wisdom, and for having welcomed me as one of her own. My warmest thanks go to Gabriel Landau, Lydia Rieck, Heather Griffith, Jessica Cimoch, Rachel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creativity in Nietzsche and Heidegger: the Relation of Art and Artist
    Creativity in Nietzsche and Heidegger: The Relation of Art and Artist Justin Hauver Philosophy and German Mentor: Hans Sluga, Philosophy August 22, 2011 I began my research this summer with a simple goal in mind: I wanted to out- line the ways in which the thoughts of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger complement one another with respect to art. I had taken a few courses on each philosopher beforehand, so I had some inclination as to how their works might be brought into agreement. However, I almost immediately ran into difficulty. It turns out that Heidegger, who lived and thought two or three generations after Nietzsche, had actually lectured on the topic of Nietzsche's philosophy of art and had placed Nietzsche firmly in a long tradition characterized by its mis- understanding of art and of the work of art. This means that Heidegger himself did not agree with me|he did not see his thoughts on art as complementary with Nietzsche's. Rather, Heidegger saw his work as an improvement over the misguided aesthetic tradition. Fortunately for me, Heidegger was simply mistaken. At least, that's my thesis. Heidegger did not see his affinity with Nietzsche because he was misled by his own misinterpretation. Nevertheless, his thoughts on art balance nicely with those of Nietzsche. To support this claim, I will make three moves today. First, I will set up Heidegger's critique, which is really a challenge to the entire tradition that begins with Plato and runs its course up to Nietzsche. Next, I will turn to Heidegger's views on art to see how he overcomes the tradition and answers his own criticism of aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 Philosophy in a Dark Time: Martin Heidegger and the Third Reich
    52 Philosophy in a Dark Time: Martin Heidegger and the Third Reich TIMOTHY O’HAGAN Like Oscar Wilde I can resist everything except temptation. So when I re- ceived Anne Meylan’s tempting invitation to contribute to this Festschrift for Pascal Engel I accepted without hesitation, before I had time to think whether I had anything for the occasion. Finally I suggested to Anne the text of a pub- lic lecture which I delivered in 2008 and which I had shown to Pascal, who responded to it with his customary enthusiasm and barrage of papers of his own on similar topics. But when I re-read it, I realized that it had been written for the general public rather than the professional philosophers who would be likely to read this collection of essays. So what was I to do with it? I’ve decided to present it in two parts. In Part One I reproduce the original lecture, unchanged except for a few minor corrections. In Part Two I engage with a tiny fraction of the vast secondary literature which has built up over the years and which shows no sign of abating. 1. Part One: The 2008 Lecture Curtain-Raiser Let us start with two dates, 1927 and 1933. In 1927 Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (volume II) was published. So too was Martin Heidegger’s magnum opus Being and Time. In 1933 two appointments were made: Hitler as Chancellor of the German Reich and Heidegger as Rector of Freiburg University. In 1927 it was a case of sheer coincidence; in 1933 the two events were closely linked.
    [Show full text]
  • Austin Andrews Curriculum Vitae March 30Th, 2020 [email protected] Department of Philosophy Washington University, St
    Austin Andrews Curriculum Vitae March 30th, 2020 [email protected] Department of Philosophy http://aandrews.net Washington University, St. Louis One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Employment McDonnell Postdoctoral Fellow Philosophy, Neuroscience, Psychology Program, Washington University, St. Louis (2018 - present) Education University of California Berkeley PhD, Philosophy (August, 2017) University of California, Santa Barbara BA, Philosophy (2009, high honors, distinction in major) Areas of specialization Philosophy of mind, philosophy of perception, epistemology Areas of competence Philosophy of cognitive science, political philosophy, ancient Greek philosophy Publications Acquiring a concept of visual experience (The Philosophical Quarterly) Research Paper on spatiality and mind-independence in visual experience (title redacted, under review) Paper on how not to explain some visual illusions (title redacted, under review) Presentations Sense-data and visual phenomenology, Central APA, 2020 Sense-data and visual phenomenology, Philosurfer Convergance, San Diego, 2019 Acquiring a concept of visual experience, Central APA, 2019 The importance of illusion, Philosurfer Convergence, San Diego, California, 2018 The importance of illusion, Invited talk, Work in Progress Lunch Series, UC Berkeley, spring 2018 Acquiring a concept of visual experience, Philosurfer Convergence, Tofno, Canada, summer 2017
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Towards a Reconsideration of Neo-Kantianism Nicolas De Warren and Andrea Staiti
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03257-6 - New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism Edited by Nicolas De Warren and Andrea Staiti Excerpt More information Introduction: towards a reconsideration of Neo-Kantianism Nicolas de Warren and Andrea Staiti In the summer of 1914, T. S. Eliot arrived in Marburg from Harvard University to attend a summer course in philosophy before taking up residency at Merton College, Oxford, for a year of study with Harold Joachim, F. H. Bradley’s successor. At the University of Marburg, Eliot met Paul Natorp, who assisted him in finding affordable accommodation and lectured in his course on philosophy. The outbreak of the First World War would cut short Eliot’s stay in Marburg, but not before he had the chance to sketch a portrait of the venerable Neo-Kantian Professor. Natorp strikes a professorial pose, one arm tucked behind his back, the other slung across his waist. With elven ears and bald cranium, the philosopher appears endearing in his otherworldliness. Natorp’s face is hidden behind oval glasses, so large that they seem to constitute a hindrance rather than an aid to seeing reality. Eliot’s sketch can be seen as a visual epitome for how Neo-Kantianism appeared to a younger generation of intellectuals and philosophers who would come of age in the aftermath of a Europe laid waste through the cataclysm of the Great War. Eliot’s amusing sketch is an apt illustration for what Hans-Georg Gadamer, who wrote his PhD dissertation on Plato under Natorp in 1922, characterized as the Neo-Kantian “calm and 1 confident aloofness” engrossed in “complacent system-building.” With slightly more bite, Hannah Arendt charged Neo-Kantianism with drown- ing philosophy “in a sea of boredom,” thereby offering a softer version of the same hostility that spirited Martin Heidegger’s confrontation with 2 Ernst Cassirer at Davos in 1929.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Nordic Wittgenstein Review 1 (2012) INTERVIEW Analytical Philosophy and Its Forgetfulness of the Continent Gottfried Gabriel in conversation with Todor Polimenov POLIMENOV: In one of his essays, Michael Dummett defines analytic philosophy as post-Fregean philosophy (1977: 441). What he means by this is that for Frege, philosophy of language is the foundation of all philosophy. According to Frege (as is apparent especially in his way of approaching philosophy of mathematics), we can only properly analyze thoughts through the analysis of language. Elsewhere, Dummett states that Frege has been the first to rightly emphasize that we cannot have a thought without expressing it in language (1978: 116). Finally, in his book on the origins of analytic philosophy, he speaks of Frege’s legacy to analytic philosophy: the linguistic turn. This legacy, according to Dummett, consists not so much in the “details of Frege’s philosophy” (which have, among others, influenced Russell, Wittgenstein, and Carnap in many respects), but rather in a basic idea which Dummett summarizes as “the extrusion of thoughts from the mind” (1993: 22). Accordingly, already in his first book This conversation took place on May 14th, 2009 in Paris at the international conference “Carnap’s Ideal of Explication: Logic, Metalogic, and ‘Wissenschaftslogik’” (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne). It was first published as “Die analytische Philosophie und ihre Kontingentvergessenheit. Gottfried Gabriel im Gespräch mit Todor Polimenov” (in German, with a Bulgarian translation) in Critique & Humanism vol. 31, 1/2010, Special Issue: Analytic Philosophy. Guest editors: A. Beshkova, E. Latinov and T. Polimenov, pp. 8–35. 155 Gottfried Gabriel & Todor Polimenov BY-NC-SA on Frege, Dummett compared Frege’s place in the history of philosophy to the philosophical revolution that started with Descartes’ epistemological turn towards the subject (1973: 665 ff).
    [Show full text]
  • Artists Post 1990 in Turkey
    WHY HAVE THERE BEEN NO MEN ARTISTS? ANALYZING AWARENESS OF MASCULINITIES THROUGH THE ARTWORKS OF "MEN" ARTISTS POST 1990 IN TURKEY by ÇAĞLAR ÇETİN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art Sabancı University Spring 2013 © Çağlar Çetin 2013 All Rights Reserved iii << For Gezi Park protestors >> iv ABSTRACT WHY HAVE THERE BEEN NO MEN ARTISTS? ANALYZING AWARENESS OF MASCULINITIES THROUGH THE ARTWORKS OF "MEN" ARTISTS POST 1990 IN TURKEY Çağlar Çetin Visual Arts and Visual Communication Design, M.A. Thesis, 2013 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Lanfranco Aceti Keywords: Gender, Masculinities, Feminism, Contemporary Art, Turkey. In parallel with feminist, LGBT and queer discussions, this research examines critical awareness of masculinities in the works of men artists in Turkish contemporary art after 1990. The research discusses criteria for critical masculinities that men artists can develop against the gender order, as well as the necessity and possibility of such an opposition. The main criteria of choosing the works of men artists, which present or do not present critical awareness of masculinities, are that these works have to have been produced and exhibited after 1990, and they discuss gender regimes through masculinities. Artworks are questioned if and how the gender order and artists' own masculinities are problematized and/or cooperation of the artists with masculine domination through their artistic visualization and conceptualization. Criticisms about the works and the statements of the artists are also referred in the examination. The thesis concerns embracing criticaly that 'men identities' are only temporarily necessary for 'men artists,' who are usually referred to as only 'artists,' unlike 'women artists.' It suggests that men should start seeking subversive strategies to transform the gender order by making their beneficiary gender visible and their agencies questionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Authenticity in the Performing Arts: a Foolish Quest? Maud Derbaix, University of Namur, Belgium Alain Decrop, University of Namur, Belgium
    ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH Labovitz School of Business & Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 11 E. Superior Street, Suite 210, Duluth, MN 55802 Authenticity in the Performing Arts: a Foolish Quest? Maud Derbaix, University of Namur, Belgium Alain Decrop, University of Namur, Belgium This research is about authenticity in the performing arts. Departing from the hyperreal condition of postmodernism, we attempt to argue that some performing arts’ spectators look for and experience a kind of authenticity when attending such shows. Looking at the different dimensions of authenticity, a series of propositions is made about its applications to the performing arts. We namely rely on a “constructivist” perspective supporting that the distinction between the authentic and the inauthentic can be socially or personally constructed. We argue that authenticity in performing arts remains in the communion of honest and true artists with a passionate audience. [to cite]: Maud Derbaix and Alain Decrop (2007) ,"Authenticity in the Performing Arts: a Foolish Quest?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 75-80. [url]: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/12741/volumes/v34/NA-34 [copyright notice]: This work is copyrighted by The Association for Consumer Research. For permission to copy or use this work in whole or in part, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at http://www.copyright.com/. Authenticity in the Performing Arts: A Foolish Quest? Maud Derbaix, University of Namur, Belgium Alain Decrop, University of Namur, Belgium Although philosophers (Benjamin [1936] 1973), anthropolo- tourism, products such as souvenirs or works of art are usually gists and sociologists (MacCannell 1973) have examined the con- described as authentic or inauthentic depending on whether they are cept of authenticity decades ago, it has been neglected by consumer made or performed by locals according to local traditions (Reisinger researchers for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation: a Journal of Political Philosophy
    Interpretation A JOURNAL J. OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Fall 1998 Volume 26 Number 1 3 Cameron Wybrow The Significance of the City in Genesis 1-11 21 Robert D. Sacks The Book of Job: Translation and Commentary on Chapters 39-42 65 Andrew Reece Drama, Narrative, and Socratic Eros in Plato's Charmides 77 Mark Kremer Liberty and Revolution in Burke's Letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol 99 Steven Berg Interpreting the Twofold Presentation of the Will to Power Doctrine in Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra Review Essays 121 Frank Schalow Heidegger, the Polity, and National Socialism 137 Bruce W. Ballard Whose Pluralism? Interpretation Editor-in-Chief Hilail Gildin, Dept. of Philosophy, Queens College Executive Editor Leonard Grey General Editors Seth G. Benardete Charles E. Butterworth * Hilail Gildin Robert Horwitz (d. 1987) Howard B. White (d. 1974) Consulting Editors Christopher Bruell Joseph Cropsey Ernest L. Fortin John Hallowell (d. 1992) Harry V. Jaffa David Lowenthal Muhsin Mahdi Harvey C. Mansfield Arnaldo Momigliano (d. 1987) Michael Oakeshott (d. 1990) Ellis Sandoz Leo Strauss (d. 1973) Kenneth W. Thompson International Editors Terence E. Marshall Heinrich Meier Editors Wayne Ambler Maurice Auerbach Fred Baumann Amy Bonnette Patrick Coby Elizabeth C de Baca Eastman - Thomas S. Engeman Edward J. Erler Maureen Feder-Marcus Pamela K. Jensen Ken Masugi Will Morrisey Susan Orr Charles T. Rubin Leslie G. Rubin Susan Meld Shell Bradford P. Wilson Michael P. Zuckert Catherine H. Zuckert Manuscript Editor Lucia B. Prochnow Subscriptions Subscription rates per volume (3 issues): individuals $29 libraries and all other institutions $48 students (four-year limit) $18 Single copies available.
    [Show full text]
  • Fakers and Forgers, Deception and Dishonesty: an Exploration of the Murky World of Art Fraud†
    Fakers and Forgers, Deception and Dishonesty: An Exploration of the Murky World of Art Fraud† Duncan Chappell and Kenneth Polk Abstract This article examines the problem of fraud in the contemporary art market. It addresses two major cases where persons have been convicted of art fraud in recent years in Australia, examining the legal context within which the prosecutions took place. It then examines problems in common terms such as ‘forgery’ and ‘fakery’. The final sections review the different ways that issues of authenticity in art are addressed in possible cases of art fraud, and examines the question of why so little art fraud comes to the attention of the criminal justice system. Introduction Art fraud, especially allegations of the circulation of spurious works of art, seems a common topic for contemporary mass media. Certainly, the present writers, as criminologists, have encountered numerous allegations of false works in the art market in our many interviews and contacts with leading figures in the Australian context over the past decade. At the same time, as we shall see, almost no cases of art fraud work their way through the court system, either in this country or overseas. This suggests that there may be significant barriers within the criminal justice system that make it difficult to prosecute successfully this form of fraud. The purpose of the present discussion is to examine the crime of art fraud in terms of the major elements that have to be established for a prosecution of the crime, based in large part upon two recent Australian prosecutions of this type which have been successful, and then go on to examine some of the reasons why such prosecutions are so rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Frege in Context
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9(3) 2001:557– 570 REVIEW ARTICLE FREGE IN CONTEXT Nikolay Milkov Gottfried Gabriel und Wolfgang Kienzler (eds). Frege in Jena. Beiträge zur Spurensicherung . (Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie , Band 2). Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1997, pp.161. Pb. DM 28. ISBN 3826014405 Gottfried Gabriel und Uwe Dathe (eds). Gottlob Frege. Werk und Wirkung. Paderborn, Mentis, 2000, pp.313. Pb. DM 30. ISBN 3897850850 REWRITING FREGE’S BIOGRAPHY English-speaking philosophers know little about Frege’s life. In 1972 T. W. Bynum published ‘On the Life and Work of Gottlob Frege’, an introduction of fty-four pages to his translation of the Begriffsschrift , in which various facts about Frege’s life were cited. These notes are still being used as a guide to Frege’s biography today – as in Anthony Kenny’s recent book Frege (see Kenny 1995, p. 1 n.). Apparently, many writers on Frege have never heard about a complete revolution in investigating Frege’s biography that took place in the 1990s in Germany, falsifying almost every sentence in Bynum’s piece. The two volumes under review – I shall refer to them as Spurensicherung and Wirkung for brevity – which are the outcome of two symposia on Frege held at the University of Jena, form the pinnacle of this biographical makeover. Indeed, from 1979 on, four such symposia had already taken place in Jena, resulting in three volumes of proceedings in each of which new data pertaining to Frege’s biography were contained. What is new in 1 I use the term ‘East German’ here, following the tradition established during the Cold War, when Germany was divided into two parts, usually known in English as East and West Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Vienna Circle Institute Library
    Vienna Circle Institute Library Volume 4 Series editor Friedrich Stadler University of Vienna, Institute Vienna Circle, Wien, Austria Institut Wiener Kreis Society for the Advancement of the Scientifi c World Conception Advisory Editorial Board: Ilkka Niiniluoto, University of Helsinki, Finland Jacques Bouveresse, Collège de France, Paris, Otto Pfersmann, Université Paris I Panthéon – France Sorbonne, France Martin Carrier, University of Bielefeld, Germany Miklós Rédei, London School of Economics, UK Nancy Cartwright, London School of Alan Richardson, University of British Economics, UK Columbia, CDN Richard Creath, Arizona State University, USA Gerhard Schurz, University of Düsseldorf, Massimo Ferrari, University of Torino, Italy Germany Michael Friedman, Stanford University, USA Peter Schuster, University of Vienna, Austria Maria Carla Galavotti, University of Bologna, Karl Sigmund, University of Vienna, Austria Italy Hans Sluga, University of California at Berkeley, Peter Galison, Harvard University, USA USA Malachi Hacohen, Duke University, USA Elliott Sober, University of Wisconsin, USA Rainer Hegselmann, University of Bayreuth, Antonia Soulez, Université de Paris 8, France Germany Wolfgang Spohn, University of Konstanz, Michael Heidelberger, University of Tübingen, Germany Germany Thomas E. Uebel, University of Manchester, UK Don Howard, University of Notre Dame, USA Pierre Wagner, Université de Paris 1, Sorbonne, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, University of Hanover, France Germany C. Kenneth Waters, University of Minnesota, USA Clemens Jabloner,
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein and Nietzsche: Two Critics of Philosophy
    Wittgenstein and Nietzsche: Two Critics of Philosophy by Anu Koshal Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date: July 23, 2010 Approved: ___________________________ Toril Moi, Supervisor __________________________ Richard Fleming __________________________ V.Y. Mudimbe __________________________ Michael Hardt Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 ABSTRACT Wittgenstein and Nietzsche: Two Critics of Philosophy by Anu Koshal Graduate Program in Literature Duke University Date: July 23, 2010 Approved: ___________________________ Toril Moi, Supervisor __________________________ Richard Fleming __________________________ V.Y. Mudimbe __________________________ Michael Hardt An abstract submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Literature in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 ii Copyright by Anu Koshal 2010 iii ABSTRACT Few philosophers have been more critical of the Western philosophical tradition than Friedrich Nietzsche and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Nietzsche and Wittgenstein did not just reject the conclusions of their philosophical predecessors; they rejected their most basic assumptions. They rejected the very idea of philosophy as the attempt to rationally develop objective theories of the world. And yet Wittgenstein and Nietzsche have now been absorbed into the discipline they wanted to abolish. This dissertation attempts to recapture the force and extent of their respective criticisms of philosophy, and evaluate their conceptions of what philosophy should be. I begin by examining Wittgenstein’s claim that philosophical problems rest on a misunderstanding of language. I show that this claim does not entail a quietist refusal to engage in philosophical problems, as many have argued.
    [Show full text]