DOCSLIB.ORG

Two Insulators Are Not Better Than One

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Two Insulators Are Not Better Than One © 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://structbio.nature.com news and views Two insulators are not better than one Fabien Mongelard and Victor G. Corces Chromatin insulators seem to control eukaryotic gene expression by regulating interactions between enhancers and promoters. Mounting evidence suggests that these sequences play a complex role in the regulation of transcription, perhaps mediated by changes in chromatin structure and nuclear organization. The expression of eukaryotic genes in spe- the largest collection of these sequences so structures, such as legs and antennae, are cific tissues and at particular times of far. The specialized chromatin structure changed into one another. These results development is determined by regulatory (scs and scs′ elements) flank one of the suggest that the Fab-7 insulator is required sequences called enhancers and silencers. heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) gene loci, for proper gene expression in order to Enhancers bind transcription factors, where they seem to delimit the region that avoid interference among the different reg- which then help initiate transcription of becomes transcriptionally active (or ulatory sequences of the Abd-B gene4–6. A the RNA at the promoter. Enhancers puffed) in response to heat shock. Other second example that illustrates the role of accomplish this independently of their Drosophila insulators include those found insulators in vivo is that of imprinting in distance and location with respect to the in the so-called gypsy retrovirus and the mice. Imprinting is an epigenetic trait gene. This flexibility in enhancer function Fab-7 and Fab-8 elements of the bithorax often seen as differences between paternal also gives these sequences the potential of complex, a complex containing three of and maternal inheritance. The parent-of- being highly promiscuous. Since this the Hox genes that encode important origin-specific expression of the mouse promiscuity is rarely observed, eukaryotes developmental control proteins in flies. H19 and Igf2 genes is controlled by an must have developed mechanisms to Insulators have also been studied in verte- insulator element located between the two insure that genes are not activated in the brates, where they have been found in the genes7,8. wrong tissue or at the wrong time of ribosomal RNA genes of Xenopus, the development by enhancers from a neigh- chicken β-globin genes and the human T Two possible models boring gene. Chromatin insulators may cell receptor (TCR)-α/δ locus among oth- Much of the work on chromatin insulators play the role of gatekeepers that curtail ers. The widespread distribution of insu- has centered on the characterization of enhancer promiscuity. lators is suggestive of an important role associated proteins with the goal of Boundaries or insulator elements have for these sequences in the biology of the explaining how these sequences affect © http://structbio.nature.com Group 2001 Nature Publishing been experimentally identified based on nucleus. enhancer function, however, progress in two defining characteristics. Insulators An idea of the role insulators could play the field has been hampered by the lack of interfere with interactions between in the cell can be gleaned from the analysis understanding of how enhancers activate enhancers and promoters and inhibit of their distribution in the bithorax com- transcription. Enhancers are currently enhancer-activated transcription, specifi- plex of Drosophila. The various genes of viewed as entry points for transcription cally when interposed between the affect- this complex are expressed in a paraseg- factors which, once bound, can interact ed enhancer and the promoter. Insulators ment-specific pattern (a parasegment is a with the transcription complex by looping also buffer transgenes, inserted in the metameric unit along the anterior-posteri- out intervening sequences9. More recently, genome at random sites, from chromoso- or axis of flies that is out of phase with seg- enhancer-bound transcription factors mal position effects1. Based on the first ments) by a complex set of regulatory have been shown tethered to proteins at property, insulators can be viewed as an sequences arranged in a linear fashion over the promoter region that are involved in additional class of regulatory sequences in 300 kb of DNA, corresponding to the order histone modification or other types of the arsenal of controlling elements at the of expression of the genes along the anteri- chromatin remodeling complexes10. Based service of genes to ensure their proper or-posterior axis of the animal. These on these findings, the effects of insulators spatial and temporal regulation. But the parasegment-specific regulatory sequences on enhancers could be explained by latter property seems to suggest a more appear to be separated by insulator ele- assuming that the insulator acts as a barri- complex role, perhaps involving the orga- ments, one of which is called Fab-7. The er that inhibits the processivity of a signal nization and compartmentalization of the Fab-7 insulator is located between two traveling from the enhancer to the pro- chromatin fiber within the nucleus. Two enhancers named iab-6 and iab-7 that con- moter, without inactivating either. The papers recently published in Science trol expression of the Abdominal-B leitmotiv of this scenario, sometimes appear to support this interpretation2,3. (Abd-B) gene in parasegments PS11 and dubbed the ‘transcriptional model’, is that PS12, respectively. Deletion of the Fab-7 the insulator acts as a promoter decoy, Properties of an insulator insulator eliminates the gatekeeper nor- confusing the enhancer-bound transcrip- Insulator elements have been described in mally ensuring that the iab-6 and iab-7 tion factor into interacting with the insu- many organisms, including yeast, enhancers activate transcription of the lator instead of the transcription Drosophila and vertebrates1. In yeast, insu- Abd-B gene in the appropriate tissues. complex11. This would result in the insula- lators appear to delimit the boundaries of Without the Fab-7 insulator, the iab-7 tor trapping the enhancer, which then silenced chromatin at telomeres and the enhancer activates expression of Abd-B in would not be able to interact with the pro- mating-type loci HML and HMR. the wrong cells, causing homeotic pheno- moter, thus precluding transcriptional Drosophila insulators were the first to be types in the adult fly. Homeotic pheno- activation. Another explanation, termed characterized and this organism displays types are those in which homologous the ‘structural model’ envisions insulators 192 nature structural biology • volume 8 number 3 • march 2001 © 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://structbio.nature.com news and views a the VRE enhancer is more efficiently blocked (Fig. 1c). Similar observations were made by Muravyova et al.3 in their companion paper. Using yellow and white as reporter genes, they show that a tandem repeat of b gypsy insulators does not have any insu- lating properties (Fig. 1b). Indeed, the authors note that enhancer–promoter communication in this configuration is improved. This holds true even when a c 1.5 kilo base pair spacer was present between the two insulators, ruling out the trivial possibility of some steric hindrance between insulators. These authors con- tribute an additional important result. d One of the constructs tested carried two copies of the gypsy insulator between the enhancers and the yellow gene, and an additional copy between yellow and white. In such a configuration both genes are Fig. 1 Effects of insulators on enhancer–promoter interactions. The diagrams represent a generic fully active (Fig. 1d). gene, depicted in blue, with a series of proteins forming the transcription complex present in the promoter region. Two enhancers, named Enhancer1 and Enhancer2, serve as binding sites for Role of insulators in chromatin transcription factors depicted in pink and purple, respectively. An insulator is shown in brown with two protein components represented as blue and green ovals. Green arrows indicate transcrip- domain organization tional activation by a specific enhancer. a, An insulator present between Enhancer1 and It is difficult to reconcile these observa- Enhancer2 affects the ability of the former to activate transcription (indicated by a red X) but not tions with a transcriptional insulator the latter. b, When an additional insulator is present between the two enhancers, the dual insula- tor cannot interfere with transcription activation by Enhancer1. c, The simple duplication of insu- model. For example, a reasonable pre- lators is not responsible for their loss of function, since when Enhancer1 is present between the diction from the decoy model is that two tandemly repeated insulator it is unable to activate transcription. d, In a more complex situation, a insulators would be better than one. second reporter gene is present downstream from the first one. Transcription of this gene can also That is, a tandem repeat of insulators be activated by Enhancer1. When tandemly repeated insulators are present and an additional insulator is present between the two genes, both genes are transcribed. would reinforce the trapping of the © http://structbio.nature.com Group 2001 Nature Publishing enhancer. Similarly, if insulators were entry points for chromatin modifying enzymatic complexes, the presence of as sequences that organize the chromatin This insulator has been shown to contain two insulators should result in a dou-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 422.Full.Pdf
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Dioxin receptor and SLUG transcription factors regulate the insulator activity of B1 SINE retrotransposons via an RNA polymerase switch Angel Carlos Roma´n,1 Francisco J. Gonza´lez-Rico,1 Eduardo Molto´,2,3 Henar Hernando,4 Ana Neto,5 Cristina Vicente-Garcia,2,3 Esteban Ballestar,4 Jose´ L. Go´mez-Skarmeta,5 Jana Vavrova-Anderson,6 Robert J. White,6,7 Lluı´s Montoliu,2,3 and Pedro M. Ferna´ndez-Salguero1,8 1Departamento de Bioquı´mica y Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain; 2Centro Nacional de Biotecnologı´a (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas (CSIC), Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain; 3Centro de Investigacio´n Biome´dica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; 4Chromatin and Disease Group, Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Programme, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08907, Spain; 5Centro Andaluz de Biologı´a del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; 6College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; 7Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom Complex genomes utilize insulators and boundary elements to help define spatial and temporal gene expression patterns. We report that a genome-wide B1 SINE (Short Interspersed Nuclear Element) retrotransposon (B1-X35S) has potent in- trinsic insulator activity in cultured cells and live animals. This insulation is mediated by binding of the transcription factors dioxin receptor (AHR) and SLUG (SNAI2) to consensus elements present in the SINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatin Insulators and Topological Domains: Adding New Dimensions to 3D Genome Architecture
    Genes 2015, 6, 790-811; doi:10.3390/genes6030790 OPEN ACCESS genes ISSN 2073-4425 www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Review Chromatin Insulators and Topological Domains: Adding New Dimensions to 3D Genome Architecture Navneet K. Matharu 1,* and Sajad H. Ahanger 2,* 1 Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Lab for Retinal Cell Biology, University of Zurich, Wagistrasse 14, Zurich 8952, Switzerland * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (N.K.M.); [email protected] (S.H.A.). Academic Editor: Jessica Tyler Received: 8 June 2015 / Accepted: 20 August 2015 / Published: 1 September 2015 Abstract: The spatial organization of metazoan genomes has a direct influence on fundamental nuclear processes that include transcription, replication, and DNA repair. It is imperative to understand the mechanisms that shape the 3D organization of the eukaryotic genomes. Chromatin insulators have emerged as one of the central components of the genome organization tool-kit across species. Recent advancements in chromatin conformation capture technologies have provided important insights into the architectural role of insulators in genomic structuring. Insulators are involved in 3D genome organization at multiple spatial scales and are important for dynamic reorganization of chromatin structure during reprogramming and differentiation. In this review, we will discuss the classical view and our renewed understanding of insulators as global genome organizers. We will also discuss the plasticity of chromatin structure and its re-organization during pluripotency and differentiation and in situations of cellular stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers
    cells Review Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers 1,2, 1, 1,3, Airat N. Ibragimov y, Oleg V. Bylino y and Yulii V. Shidlovskii * 1 Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (A.N.I.); [email protected] (O.V.B.) 2 Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia 3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8, bldg. 2 Trubetskaya St., 119048 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-4991354096 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Transcriptional enhancers are major genomic elements that control gene activity in eukaryotes. Recent studies provided deeper insight into the temporal and spatial organization of transcription in the nucleus, the role of non-coding RNAs in the process, and the epigenetic control of gene expression. Thus, multiple molecular details of enhancer functioning were revealed. Here, we describe the recent data and models of molecular organization of enhancer-driven transcription. Keywords: enhancer; promoter; chromatin; transcriptional bursting; transcription factories; enhancer RNA; epigenetic marks 1. Introduction Gene transcription is precisely organized in time and space. The process requires the participation of hundreds of molecules, which form an extensive interaction network. Substantial progress was achieved recently in our understanding of the molecular processes that take place in the cell nucleus (e.g., see [1–9]).
    [Show full text]
  • A Subset of Drosophila Myc Sites Remain Associated with Mitotic Chromosomes Colocalized with Insulator Proteins
    ARTICLE Received 16 Aug 2012 | Accepted 7 Jan 2013 | Published 12 Feb 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2469 A subset of Drosophila Myc sites remain associated with mitotic chromosomes colocalized with insulator proteins Jingping Yang1, Elizabeth Sung1, Paul G. Donlin-Asp1 & Victor G. Corces1 Myc has been characterized as a transcription factor that activates expression of genes involved in pluripotency and cancer, and as a component of the replication complex. Here we find that Myc is present at promoters and enhancers of Drosophila melanogaster genes during interphase. Myc colocalizes with Orc2, which is part of the prereplication complex, during G1. As is the case in mammals, Myc associates preferentially with paused genes, suggesting that it may also be involved in the release of RNA polymerase II from the promoter-proximal pausing in Drosophila. Interestingly, about 40% of Myc sites present in interphase persists during mitosis. None of the Myc mitotic sites correspond to enhancers, and only some correspond to promoters. The rest of the mitotic Myc sites overlap with binding sites for multiple insulator proteins that are also maintained in mitosis. These results suggest alternative mechanisms to explain the role of Myc in pluripotency and cancer. 1 Department of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressedto V.G.C. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:1464 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2469 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2469 yc has been extensively studied as an oncogene that has Results critical roles in cancer initiation and metastasis of many Myc is present at the promoters of paused genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Insulator for Preventing Influence by Another Gene Promoter Susheng Gan University of Kentucky
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Plant and Soil Sciences Faculty Patents Plant and Soil Sciences 10-20-2009 Genetic Insulator for Preventing Influence by Another Gene Promoter Susheng Gan University of Kentucky Mingtang Xie Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_patents Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gan, Susheng and Xie, Mingtang, "Genetic Insulator for Preventing Influence by Another Gene Promoter" (2009). Plant and Soil Sciences Faculty Patents. 35. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_patents/35 This Patent is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Plant and Soil Sciences Faculty Patents by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. US007605300B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,605,300 B2 Gan et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 20, 2009 (54) GENETIC INSULATOR FOR PREVENTING Gan, S. Ph.D. Thesis; Molecular characterization and genetic INFLUENCE BY ANOTHER GENE manipulation of plant senescence (University of Wisconsin-Madi PROMOTER son, Madison, 1995).* Millar et al., The Plant Cell, vol. 11, pp. 825-838, May 1999. (75) Inventors: Susheng Gan, Lexington, KY (U S); NCBI, GenBank, AF129511, 2000. An G, “Binary Ti vectors for plant transformation and promoter Mingtang Xie, Burnaby (CA) analysis.” In Methods in Enzymology.‘ RecombinantDNA, R. Wu, and L. Grossman, eds, 292-305 (San Diego, Academic Press, 1987). (73) Assignee: University of Kentucky Research Bechtold N et al., “In Planta Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer Foundation, Lexington, KY (U S) by in?ltration of adult Arabidopsis plants”, C R Acad Sci Paris 316, 1194-1199 (1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Classic the Insulator Activity of CTCF
    Annotated Classic The Insulator Activity of CTCF Victor G. Corces1,* 1Department of Biology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] We are pleased to present a series of Annotated Classics celebrating 40 years of exciting biology in the pages of Cell. This install- ment revisits “The Protein CTCF Is Required for the Enhancer Blocking Activity of Vertebrate Insulators” by Dr. Gary Felsenfeld and his colleagues. Here, Dr. Victor G. Corces comments on the landmark discovery of the insulator activity of CTCF from Felsenfeld, who has pioneered the work decoding the function of CTCF in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Each Annotated Classic offers a personal perspective on a groundbreaking Cell paper from a leader in the field with notes on what stood out at the time of first reading and retrospective comments regarding the longer term influence of the work. To see Victor G. Corces’ thoughts on different parts of the manuscript, just download the PDF and then hover over or double-click the highlighted text and comment boxes on the following pages. You can also view Corces’ annotation by opening the Comments navigation panel in Acrobat. Cell 158, August 14, 2014, 2014 ©2014 Elsevier Inc. Cell, Vol. 98, 387±396, August 6, 1999, Copyright 1999 by Cell Press The Protein CTCF Is Required for the Enhancer Blocking Activity of Vertebrate Insulators Adam C. Bell, Adam G. West, and Gary Felsenfeld* al., 1985). When scs elements are placed on either side Laboratory of Molecular Biology of a gene for eye color and introduced into Drosophila, National Institute of Diabetes and the resulting flies all have similar eye color independent Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the transgene's site of integration, an indication that National Institutes of Health scs has protected the reporter gene from both negative Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0540 and positive endogenous influences, or ªposition ef- fectsº (Kellum and Schedl, 1991, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Dimensional Genome Architecture: Players and Mechanisms
    REVIEWS Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms Ana Pombo1 and Niall Dillon2 Abstract | The different cell types of an organism share the same DNA, but during cell differentiation their genomes undergo diverse structural and organizational changes that affect gene expression and other cellular functions. These can range from large-scale folding of whole chromosomes or of smaller genomic regions, to the re-organization of local interactions between enhancers and promoters, mediated by the binding of transcription factors and chromatin looping. The higher-order organization of chromatin is also influenced by the specificity of the contacts that it makes with nuclear structures such as the lamina. Sophisticated methods for mapping chromatin contacts are generating genome-wide data that provide deep insights into the formation of chromatin interactions, and into their roles in the organization and function of the eukaryotic cell nucleus. Chromatin The 2-metre length of DNA in a mammalian cell is more than 30 years ago, it has become clear that this type immunoprecipitation organized into chromosomes, which are packaged and of genetic element can regulate gene trans­cription over A method in which chromatin folded through various mechanisms and occupy discrete large distances. Looping out of the DNA that separates bound by a protein is positions in the nucleus. The multiple levels of DNA promoters and distally located enhancers was proposed immunoprecipitated with an antibody against that protein, folding generate extensive contacts between different as a mechanism by which factors that are bound to to allow the extraction and genomic regions. These contacts are influenced by the enhancers can directly contact their target promoters analysis of the bound DNA proximity of DNA sequences to one another, by the fold- and influence the composition of transcription initiation by quantitative PCR or ing architecture of local and long-range chromatin con- complexes (FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Boosting Gene Expression Through Enhanced Mrna Stability and Translational Efficiency
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/787127; this version posted September 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Pseudomonas mRNA 2.0: Boosting Gene Expression Through 2 Enhanced mRNA Stability and Translational Efficiency. 3 Dário Neves1, Stefan Vos1, Lars M. Blank1, and Birgitta E. Ebert1,*† 4 1Institute of Applied Microbiology-iAMB, Aachen Biology and Biotechnology-ABBt, RWTH 5 Aachen University, Germany 6 † present address: Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of 7 Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 8 * Correspondence: 9 Dr. Birgitta E. Ebert 10 [email protected] 11 12 Abstract 13 High gene expression of enzymes partaking in recombinant production pathways is a desirable trait 14 among cell factories belonging to all different kingdoms of life. High enzyme abundance is generally 15 aimed for by utilizing strong promoters, which ramp up gene transcription and mRNA levels. 16 Increased protein abundance can alternatively be achieved by optimizing the expression on the post- 17 transcriptional level. Here, we evaluated protein synthesis with a previously proposed optimized gene 18 expression architecture, in which mRNA stability and translation initiation are modulated by genetic 19 parts such as self-cleaving ribozymes and a bicistronic design, which have initially been described to 20 support the standardization of gene expression. The optimized gene expression architecture was 21 tested in Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120, a promising, novel microbial cell factory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Drosophila Insulator Interacting Protein Suppresses Enhancer
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/661041; this version posted June 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. A Drosophila Insulator Interacting Protein Suppresses Enhancer-Blocking Function and Modulates Replication Timing Emily C. Stow, Ran An, Todd A. Schoborg†, Nastasya M. Davenport, James R. Simmons, and Mariano Labrador1 Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Authors affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 1Author for correspondence ([email protected]) †Current address: Laboratory of Molecular Machines and Tissue Architecture, Cell Biology and Physiology CenterNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA Running title: Insulator function and replication timing Keywords: Chromatin insulators, chromatin boundaries, gypsy, suppressor of Hairy wing, Su(Hw), HIPP1, Drosophila, DNA damage response, double strand breaks (DSBs), DNA replication, replication timing, Genome instability. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/661041; this version posted June 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Insulators play important roles in genome structure and function in Drosophila and mammals. More than six different insulator proteins are required in Drosophila for normal genome function, whereas CTCF is the only identified protein contributing to insulator function in mammals. Interactions between a DNA binding insulator protein and its interacting partner proteins define the properties of each insulator site.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation Dysregulates and Silences the HLA-DQ Locus by Altering Chromatin Architecture
    Genes and Immunity (2011) 12, 291–299 & 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1466-4879/11 www.nature.com/gene ORIGINAL ARTICLE DNA methylation dysregulates and silences the HLA-DQ locus by altering chromatin architecture P Majumder and JM Boss Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School Of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA The major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) locus encodes a cluster of highly polymorphic genes HLA-DR, -DQ and -DP that are co-expressed in mature B lymphocytes. Two cell lines were established over 30 years ago from a patient diagnosed with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Laz221 represented the leukemic cells of the patient; whereas Laz388 represented the normal B cells of the patient. Although Laz388 expressed both HLA-DR and HLA-DQ surface and gene products, Laz221 expressed only HLA-DR genes. The discordant expression of HLA-DR and HLA-DQ genes was due to epigenetic silencing of the HLA-DQ region CCCTC transcription factor (CTCF)-binding insulators that separate the MHC-II sub-regions by DNA methylation. These epigenetic modifications resulted in the loss of binding of the insulator protein CTCF to the HLA-DQ flanking insulator regions and the MHC-II-specific transcription factors to the HLA-DQ promoter regions. These events led to the inability of the HLA-DQ promoter regions to interact with flanking insulators that control HLA-DQ expression. Inhibition of DNA methylation by treatment with 50-deoxyazacytidine reversed each of these changes and restored expression of the HLA-DQ locus. These results highlight the consequence of disrupting an insulator within the MHC-II region and may be a normal developmental mechanism or one used by tumor cells to escape immune surveillance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insulator Protein CTCF Is Required for Correct Hox Gene Expression, but Not for Embryonic Development in Drosophila
    | COMMUNICATIONS The Insulator Protein CTCF Is Required for Correct Hox Gene Expression, but Not for Embryonic Development in Drosophila Maria Cristina Gambetta1,2 and Eileen E. M. Furlong2 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany ORCID IDs: 0000-0002-9450-3551 (M.C.G.); 0000-0002-9544-8339 (E.E.F.) ABSTRACT Insulator binding proteins (IBPs) play an important role in regulating gene expression by binding to specific DNA sites to facilitate appropriate gene regulation. There are several IBPs in Drosophila, each defined by their ability to insulate target gene promoters in transgenic assays from the activating or silencing effects of neighboring regulatory elements. Of these, only CCCTC- binding factor (CTCF) has an obvious ortholog in mammals. CTCF is essential for mammalian cell viability and is an important regulator of genome architecture. In flies, CTCF is both maternally deposited and zygotically expressed. Flies lacking zygotic CTCF die as young adults with homeotic defects, suggesting that specific Hox genes are misexpressed in inappropriate body segments. The lack of any major embryonic defects was assumed to be due to the maternal supply of CTCF protein, as maternally contributed factors are often sufficient to progress through much of embryogenesis. Here, we definitively determined the requirement of CTCF for developmental progression in Drosophila. We generated animals that completely lack both maternal and zygotic CTCF and found that, contrary to expectation, these mutants progress through embryogenesis and larval life. They develop to pharate adults, which fail to eclose from their pupal case. These mutants show exacerbated homeotic defects compared to zygotic mutants, misexpressing the Hox gene Abdominal-B outside of its normal expression domain early in development.
    [Show full text]
  • An Insulator Element and Condensed Chromatin Region Separate the Chicken Β-Globin Locus from an Independently Regulated Erythroid-Specific Folate Receptor Gene
    The EMBO Journal Vol.18 No.14 pp.4035–4048, 1999 An insulator element and condensed chromatin region separate the chicken β-globin locus from an independently regulated erythroid-specific folate receptor gene Marie-Noe¨ lle Prioleau1, Pascale Nony2, (Stalder et al., 1980; Lawson et al., 1982; Jantzen et al., Melanie Simpson and Gary Felsenfeld3 1986; Stratling et al., 1986; Levy-Wilson and Fortier, 1989). Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and For a domain to be a truly independent unit, it should Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, contain all of the regulatory elements necessary for the Bethesda, MD 20892-0540, USA correct expression of the genes located within; some well 1 Present address: Laboratoire de Ge´ne´tique Mole´culaire, characterized domains do maintain a higher level of tissue- CNRS URA 1302, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France 2Present address: Laboratoire de The´rapie Ge´nique, and stage-specific expression when integrated into the Baˆtiment Jean Monnet-Hoˆtel Dieu 30, boulevard Jean Monnet, genome than constructs containing only proximal cis- 44035 Nantes Cedex 1, France regulatory elements (Greaves et al., 1989; Bonifer et al., 3Corresponding author 1994; Mason et al., 1995; Dillon et al., 1997). DNA e-mail: [email protected] sequences that induce efficient gene expression independ- ently of the site of integration have been identified in a We have identified a folate receptor gene upstream of number of different domains. Usually they are marked by the chicken β-globin locus and separated from it by a a series of DNase I hypersensitive sites.
    [Show full text]