DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Draft Visitor Services Plan and Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Draft Visitor Services Plan and Environmental Assessment Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Draft Visitor Services Plan and Environmental Assessment __________________________________________________________ Project Leader / Refuge Manager Date __________________________________________________________ Refuge Supervisor Date _________________________________________________________ Chief, Division of Visitor Services Date _________________________________________________________ Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System Date Florida Panther NWR Draft Visitor Services Plan Page 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION A. VISITOR SERVICES PLAN .................................................................................. 6 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 6 A. Refuge History, Purposes, and Resources .................................................................. 7 B. Visitor Services Program Purpose and Scope of Plan ................................................16 C. History of the Refuge Visitor Services Program ..........................................................17 D. Visitor Services Issues, Concerns, and Factors To Consider .....................................18 E. Themes, Messages, and Topics .................................................................................19 F. Visitor Facilities and Services .....................................................................................20 G. Visitor Services Maps .................................................................................................24 H. Refuge Visitation Trends and Identifying Audiences ....................................................32 I. Visitor Capacity ...........................................................................................................35 II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ......................................................................................36 Standard 1: Develop a Visitor Services Plan ....................................................................41 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................41 Standard 1: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................41 Monitor and evaluate: .............................................................................................41 Standard 2: Welcome and Orient Visitors ........................................................................42 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................42 Standard 2: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies: ......................................................43 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................44 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................44 Standard 3: Hunting .........................................................................................................45 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................45 Standard 3: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................45 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................46 Standard 4: Fishing ..........................................................................................................47 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................47 Standard 4: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................47 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................48 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................48 Standard 5: Wildlife Observation and Wildlife Photography .............................................49 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................49 Standard 5: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................49 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................51 Standard 6: Environmental Education ..............................................................................51 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................52 Standard 6: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................53 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................55 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................55 Standard 7: Interpretation ................................................................................................56 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................56 Standard 7: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................57 Florida Panther NWR Draft Visitor Services Plan Page 2 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................58 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................58 Standard 8: Manage for Other Recreational Use Opportunities .......................................59 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................59 Standard 8: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................59 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................60 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................62 Standard 9: Outreach ......................................................................................................63 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................63 Standard 9: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................64 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................65 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................66 Standard 10: Volunteers and Friends ...............................................................................67 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................67 Standard 10: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .....................................................68 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................69 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................70 11: Recreation Fee Program ............................................................................................71 Current Program Discussion: ..................................................................................71 Standard 11. Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .....................................................71 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................72 12: Concessions ..............................................................................................................73 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................73 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................73 13: Commercial Recreational Uses ..................................................................................74 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................74 Standard 13: Goals, Objectives, and strategies ......................................................74 Proposed Program Changes ..................................................................................75 Monitor and evaluate ..............................................................................................75 14: Wilderness .................................................................................................................76 Current Program Discussion ...................................................................................76 III. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ........................................................................................77 IV. VISITOR SERVICES ANNUAL WORK PLAN .....................................................................79 V. VISITOR SERVICES ANNUAL PARTNERSHIP PLANNING ...............................................81 VI. LITERATURE CITED ..........................................................................................................86 SECTION B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Kestrel, Falco Sparverius
    American Kestrel, Falco sparverius Status: State: Threatened Federal: Not listed Identification The American kestrel is the smallest and most widely distributed falcon in North America (Smallwood & Bird 2002, Hawk Mountain n.d.). At first glance, kestrels are often confused with other small birds such as mourning doves because of their propensity to perch on utility lines (Hawk Mountain n.d.). Kestrels however, have larger more roundish heads and often tip or “bob” their tails while perched. In flight, kestrels have a diagnostic flight pattern of quickly alternating between rapid wing beating and gliding. With proper lighting, their colorful plumage can further aid in positive identification. Kestrels are both sexually dimorphic and dichromatic; therefore sexing can be done at a distance and in chicks as young as three weeks (Hawk Mountain n.d.). Males are on average 10% smaller than females though this may be hard to ascertain in the field (Hawk Mountain 1997, Smallwood & Bird 2002). Males are more colorful, with bluish- gray wings (with or without black barring) and rufous (reddish-brown) tails. A single black bar tipped in white extends across the terminal end of the largely unmarked tail. Females are rufous on their wings and tails, often with multiple black bars extending horizontally along the length (Hawk Male American Kestrel Mountain n.d.). Plumage is highly variable © Jim Gilbert among individuals (Smallwood & Bird 2002). Both sexes exhibit grayish crowns and rufous crown patches with two vertical black stripes down their white cheeks. Black “eyespots on the back of their heads are thought to aid in reducing predation on kestrels by larger birds of prey- giving the illusion of predator awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Department Of
    STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Herschel T. Vinyard Jr., Secretary REGULATORY PROGRAMS Jeff Littlejohn, Deputy Secretary FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Jonathan D. Arthur, State Geologist and Director OPEN-FILE REPORT 97 Text to accompany geologic map of the western portion of the USGS Inverness 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, central Florida By Christopher P. Williams and Richard C. Green 2012 ISSN (1058-1391) This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program under assistance award number G11AC20418 in Federal fiscal year 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Previous Work ................................................................................................................................ 5 GEOLOGIC SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 5 Structure .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Geomorphology ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife of the North Hills: Birds, Animals, Butterflies
    Wildlife of the North Hills: Birds, Animals, Butterflies Oakland, California 2005 About this Booklet The idea for this booklet grew out of a suggestion from Anne Seasons, President of the North Hills Phoenix Association, that I compile pictures of local birds in a form that could be made available to residents of the north hills. I expanded on that idea to include other local wildlife. For purposes of this booklet, the “North Hills” is defined as that area on the Berkeley/Oakland border bounded by Claremont Avenue on the north, Tunnel Road on the south, Grizzly Peak Blvd. on the east, and Domingo Avenue on the west. The species shown here are observed, heard or tracked with some regularity in this area. The lists are not a complete record of species found: more than 50 additional bird species have been observed here, smaller rodents were included without visual verification, and the compiler lacks the training to identify reptiles, bats or additional butterflies. We would like to include additional species: advice from local experts is welcome and will speed the process. A few of the species listed fall into the category of pests; but most - whether resident or visitor - are desirable additions to the neighborhood. We hope you will enjoy using this booklet to identify the wildlife you see around you. Kay Loughman November 2005 2 Contents Birds Turkey Vulture Bewick’s Wren Red-tailed Hawk Wrentit American Kestrel Ruby-crowned Kinglet California Quail American Robin Mourning Dove Hermit thrush Rock Pigeon Northern Mockingbird Band-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Success of Southeastern American Kestrels Associated with Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers in Old-Growth Longleaf Pine Habitat in Northwest Florida
    2004SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 3(2):191–204 Nest Success of Southeastern American Kestrels Associated with Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers in Old-Growth Longleaf Pine Habitat in Northwest Florida 1,* 2 1,3 KATHLEEN E. GAULT , JEFFREY R. WALTERS , JOSEPH TOMCHO, JR. , 1,4 1,5 LOUIS F. PHILLIPS, JR. , AND ANDREW BUTLER Abstract - The Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus), a non-migratory subspecies of the widespread American Kestrel, has declined to the point that it is listed as threatened in Florida, the state in which it is most common. We studied the nesting biology of Southeastern American Kestrels in 1999 and 2000 at Eglin Air Force Base, FL, in old-growth longleaf pine sa- vanna, a habitat type historically widely occupied by the kestrels. Most of the nest cavities we observed were in old-growth trees, both living and dead, and were originally excavated by Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) and then enlarged by other woodpecker species. Nesting success was 70% in 1999 and 56% in 2000. In 1999, 67% of eggs survived to become fledglings in successful nests, as did 58% in 2000. Nests in live pines and snags were equally successful, and nest success was positively related to cavity height in 1999. Reduced nesting success in 2000 may have been related to severe drought conditions. High nesting concentrations of up to 4 pairs per km2 were observed. We suggest that stands of old-growth longleaf pine, with little or no hardwood midstory and a relatively high number of snags, inhabited by Red-cockaded Woodpeckers, may constitute high quality habitat for Southeastern American Kestrels.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Predatory and Caching Behavior of American Kestrels in Central Missouri
    UNUSUAL PREDATORY AND CACHING BEHAVIOR OF AMERICAN KESTRELS IN CENTRAL MISSOURI BRIAN TOLAND ABSTRACT- Caching behavior of the AmericanKestrel (Falco sparver/us) was studied 1981-1983 in BooneCounty, Missouri.Both wild prey and quarry thrown from car windowswere cached.Kestrels cached food 116 timesand retrievedit 77.5%of thetime. Males cached food in elevatedsites (at least 4 m high)64% of thetime while females did so only20%. During spring and summer, 93% of the preyitems were cached uneaten. During fall andwinter, only 42% of the foodcached was uneaten. When a surplusof preywas created by releasingseveral mice at a time,kestrels killed them whileflying to theircache sites. These prey items were stored in the samecache site. Apparently, caching behavior of AmericanKestrels is not directlycorrelated with the lengthof time betweenfeedings, and cachingbehavior operates independentlyof fooddeprivation, especially in springand summer. Many reptorshave been observed caching prey. cache,weather conditions, time of day, and durationof caching Mueller(1974) provided a reviewof foodstoring in sequence.Additional live prey was thrown from my carwindow to kestrelsperched within 25 m of roads.The prey thrown were severalcaptive species.Among the falconiforms, brown,gray, white and blackHouse Mouse (Mus musculus) and preycaching seems to be mostdeveloped and wide- HouseSparrows (Passer domesticus) with several primaries pulled to spreadin falcons.Published records of cachingin- ensuretheir captureby kestrels. clude those for the Merlin (Falco columbarius) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Greaves1968; Oliphant and Thompson 1976; Pitcheret al. 1982),American Kestrel (F. sparverius) During the 2 yr study 1210 h of observationof (Pierce 1937; Tordoff 1955; Roest 1957; Stendell kestrels were made and 30 kestrels were seen cach- and Waian 1968; Balgooyen1976; Collopy1977), ing prey a total of 116 times.
    [Show full text]
  • American Kestrel: Falco Sparverius, EC 1578 (Oregon State University Extension Service)
    Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/ec1578 EC 1578 • December 2005 $1.00 American Kestrel Falco sparverius by J. Jones and S. Sells id you know that the American easy to attract them to your area. Kestrels kestrel is the smallest falcon in live near open fi elds and meadows. They D North America and the second hunt in open areas and fi nd shelter in smallest falcon in the world? The aver- nearby trees. They are found throughout age length of the American kestrel is 9 to North, South, and Central America. 12 inches, about the size of a robin. Kestrels have some interesting antics A falcon is a bird of prey, or raptor, that make them easy to identify. Look for which in Latin means “to seize.” Raptors kestrels on telephone wires along open have very good eyesight, a hooked beak, fi elds. If a robin-size bird is bobbing its and eight very sharp talons, all of which head and pumping its tail, it might be help them hunt and catch their prey. a kestrel. Their calls sound like a shrill Kestrels are one of the most abundant “killy killy killy.” raptors in North America, so it should be Photo: Noah Strycker Photo: Pete Albers, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Photo: Pete Albers, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research American kestrels like to perch on fence A nest box can provide a home for kestrels if tree posts or tree limbs while searching for cavities aren’t available. prey. Jenelle Jones and Sarah Sells, students in Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University.
    [Show full text]
  • American Kestrel Mountain Region
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service Rocky for the American Kestrel Mountain Region Black Hills in the Black Hills National National Forest Custer, Forest, South Dakota and South Dakota December 2002 Wyoming Aran S. Johnson and Stanley H. Anderson Conservation Assessment for the American Kestrel in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming. Aran S. Johnson and Stanley H. Anderson Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Wyoming P.O. Box 3166 Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Aran S. Johnson is a Research Scientist in the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Wyoming. He received his B.Sc. in 1995 at the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay and his M.Sc. in 2001 at the University of Wyoming. His master’s project investigated logging effects on riparian and upland songbird species. Raptor projects that Aran has been involved with have included studies on Northern Harriers, American Kestrels, Northern Goshawks, Golden Eagles, Ferruginous Hawks and Burrowing Owls. Stanley H. Anderson is the leader of the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. He received his Ph.D. from Oregon State University in 1970 and his B.Sc. from the University of Redlands in 1961. During his career at Kenyon College, Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Patuxent Research Center and the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit he has worked extensively on wildlife habitat, publishing as author or co-author more than 230 scientific articles. Stan has done extensive work on raptors throughout the United States, South America, and Australia. He has worked with nearly 100 graduate students at the Coop and presented courses in ornithology and wildlife management.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptors in New Hampshire Orchards
    Bringing information and education into the communities of the Granite State Raptors in New Hampshire Orchards Dr. Alan T. Eaton, Extension Specialist, Entomology You may be able to enhance your rodent management program by careful placement of nest boxes for hawks and owls. Each species varies in its nest site preferences and box dimensions, so it is critical to construct and place the boxes according to what species are likely to live in the available habitat. Some boxes may require annual You may be able to enhance your cleaning and careful placement to attract the desired residents. rodent management program by There are three raptors here that accept nest boxes, and prey on careful placement of nest boxes for voles (sparrow hawk, saw-whet owl, barred owl). Two others may hawks and owls. be of interest (great horned owl, screech owl). Sparrow Hawk or American Kestrel This species is a daytime hunter. It commonly forages in fields, meadows, and semi-open habitats like orchards. It prefers open sites for its nest (on a fence row for example). Place nest boxes on an isolated tree or free standing post, 15 to 30 feet up. A high, undisturbed spot on the side of a barn may be appropriate. Make the entry hole three inches in diameter and face it south or west. Place two to three inches of wood chips on the bottom. Starlings frequently take up residence in these boxes, so regular checking and removal of starling nests would increase chances of kestrels using them. Use box plan A. Saw-Whet Owl The saw-whet owl is night active.
    [Show full text]
  • Hickey Creek Mitigation Park Land Management Plan - Third Edition 17980 Palm Beach Blvd
    Hickey Creek Mitigation Park & Hickey Creek Greenbriar Connector Preserve Land Management Plan 2016 – 2026 i Hickey Creek Mitigation Park Land Management Plan - Third Edition 17980 Palm Beach Blvd. Alva, FL. 33920 & Hickey Creek Greenbriar Connector Preserve Land Management Plan - Second Edition Lee County Lee County Florida Fish and Florida Department of Department of Wildlife Communities Parks and Parks and Conservation Trust Recreation Recreation’s Commission Conservation 20/20 Lands Program Photo credits for cover page: Carolyn Babb (Florida Scrub-jay); Joseph Dodds (large tickseed); Annisa Karim (all other photos). Prepared by the Conservation Lands Section of the Lee County Department of Parks and Recreation in Cooperation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Approved by the Lee County Board of County Commissioners on August 16, 2016. Appendix E Approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of State Lands - Office of Environmental Services on April 6, 2016. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their time and sharing their knowledge in assisting me with the development of the Hickey Creek Mitigation Park & Hickey Creek Greenbriar Connector Preserve Land Management Plan: Steven Shattler, Cathy Olson, Robert Repenning, Teresa Cain, Heather Gienapp, Joseph Dodds, Mary Ellen Harper, Rudy Lampron, and Karen Bledsoe. Annisa Karim Manager Lyonia lucida shiny fetterbush iii Table of Contents Vision Statement ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Paleontology and Stratigraphy of the Suwannee River Basin of North Florida and South Georgia
    MIOCENE PALEONTOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SUWANNEE RIVER BASIN OF NORTH FLORIDA AND SOUTH GEORGIA SOUTHEASTERN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebook Number 30 October 7, 1989 MIOCENE PALEONTOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SUWANNEE RIVER BASIN OF NORTH FLORIDA AND SOUTH GEORGIA Compiled and edit e d by GARY S . MORGAN GUIDEBOOK NUMBER 30 A Guidebook for the Annual Field Trip of the Southeastern Geological Society October 7, 1989 Published by the Southeastern Geological Society P. 0 . Box 1634 Tallahassee, Florida 32303 TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of field trip area ...... ... ................................... 1 Road log . ....................................... ..... ..... ... .... 2 Preface . .................. ....................................... 4 The lithostratigraphy of the sediments exposed along the Suwannee River in the vicinity of White Springs by Thomas M. scott ........................................... 6 Fossil invertebrates from the banks of the Suwannee River at White Springs, Florida by Roger W. Portell ...... ......................... ......... 14 Miocene vertebrate faunas from the Suwannee River Basin of North Florida and South Georgia by Gary s. Morgan .................................. ........ 2 6 Fossil sirenians from the Suwannee River, Florida and Georgia by Daryl P. Damning . .................................... .... 54 1 HAMIL TON CO. MAP OF FIELD TRIP AREA 2 ROAD LOG Total Mileage from Reference Points Mileage Last Point 0.0 0.0 Begin at Holiday Inn, Lake City, intersection of I-75 and US 90. 7.3 7.3 Pass under I-10. 12 . 6 5.3 Turn right (east) on SR 136. 15.8 3 . 2 SR 136 Bridge over Suwannee River. 16.0 0.2 Turn left (west) on us 41. 19 . 5 3 . 5 Turn right (northeast) on CR 137. 23.1 3.6 On right-main office of Occidental Chemical Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds Seen in Ridgefield Open Spaces in 2020
    Birds of Ridgefield Seen in 2020 in open spaces around town. BELTED KINGFISHER Seen in October 2020 at Mar-Joy Pond. The Belted Kingfisher has a wild rattling call. It may be seen perched on a high branch, or hovering over the water, wings beating rapidly, then plunging headfirst into the water to grab a fish. Photo: Matt Sharp. Seen in November 2020 at Bennets Pond Pond. Photo: Matt Sharp. WOOD DUCK Seen at Mar-Joy Pond in October 2020 The wood duck is found in woodland ponds and river swamps, where they nest in holes in trees or in nest boxes put up around lake margins. In the late 19th century it's numbers were declining. Its recovery to healthy numbers was an early triumph of wildlife management. They are one of the few duck species equipped with strong claws that can grip bark and perch on branches. Photo: Matt Sharp YELLOW RUMPED WARBLER Seen at McKeon farm in November 2020. The yellow rumped warbler is the best known warbler found all over North America. Most warblers migrate to the tropics in fall, but the Yellow-rump remains as far north as New England and Seattle; it is the main winter warbler in North America eating berries. It is the only warbler able to digest the waxes found in bayberries and wax myrtles. As it flies away you catch a glimpse of its trademark yellow rump patch. Photo: Matt Sharp PALM WARBLER Seen at McKeon farm in October 2020. This is a song bird often seen low to the ground feeding on insects and small berries.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Origin and Evolution of Tampa Bay 37
    Chapter 3. Origin and Evolution of Tampa Bay 37 Chapter 3. Origin and Evolution of Tampa Bay By Gerold Morrison (AMEC-BCI) and Kimberly K. Yates (U.S. Geological Survey–St. Petersburg, Florida) TAMPA BAY HAS AN UNUSUAL geologic history when compared to many other estuaries in the eastern U.S. (Brooks and Doyle, 1998; Hine and others, 2009). It lies near the center of the carbonate Florida Platform (fig. 3–1), and is associated with a buried “shelf valley system” (including a paleo-channel feature located beneath the modern Egmont Channel) that formed in the early Miocene, about 20 million years ago (Ma) (Hine, 1997; Donahue and others, 2003; Duncan and others, 2003). Since that time the area has been subject to substantial fluctuations in sea level and alternating periods of sediment deposition and removal. These events have produced a complex distribution of siliciclastic and carbonate-based sediments within the bay, its associated barrier islands, and the inner Florida shelf (Brooks and Doyle, 1998; Brooks and others, 2003; Duncan and others, 2003; Ferguson and Davis, 2003). Sinkholes and other karst features in the underlying carbonate strata, which are common throughout the west-central Florida region, have been important factors underlying the development of both Tampa Bay (Brooks and Doyle, 1998; Donahue and others, 2003) and Charlotte Harbor, a geologically similar estuary located about 100 mi to the south (Hine and others, 2009). In the case of Tampa Bay, the underlying shelf valley system consists of multiple karst controlled subbasins (separated by bedrock highs) that have been filled by sediments, some of which were deposited fluvially (Hine and others, 2009).
    [Show full text]