Report for Italy for the Third Review and Appraisal Cycle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Real World Use of Antidiabetic Drugs in the Years 2011–2017: a Population-Based Study from Southern Italy
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Real World Use of Antidiabetic Drugs in the Years 2011–2017: A Population-Based Study from Southern Italy Ylenia Ingrasciotta 1,* , Maria Paola Bertuccio 1 , Salvatore Crisafulli 1, Valentina Ientile 1, Marco Muscianisi 2 , Luca L’Abbate 1, Maurizio Pastorello 3, Vincenzo Provenzano 4, Alessandro Scorsone 4, Salvatore Scondotto 5 and Gianluca Trifirò 6 1 Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (M.P.B.); [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (V.I.); [email protected] (L.L.) 2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy; [email protected] 3 Palermo Local Health Unit, Department of Pharmacy, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 4 Regional Referral Centre for Insulin Pump Implantation and Diabetes, Civic Hospital, Partinico, 90047 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (V.P.); [email protected] (A.S.) 5 Department of Epidemiologic Observatory, Health Department of Sicily, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 6 Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; gianluca.trifi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-090-2213877 Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 18 December 2020 Abstract: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia. The availability of new antidiabetic drugs (ADs) has led to complex treatment patterns and to changes in the patterns of specific drug utilization. The aim of this population-based study was to describe the pattern of antidiabetic drugs (ADs) use in Southern Italy in the years 2011–2017, in relation to the updated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) therapy guidelines. -
Research and Innovation Policy in Italy
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Research and innovation policy in Italy Nascia, Leopoldo and Pianta, Mario Università Roma Tre, Scuola Normale Superiore, Istat 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89510/ MPRA Paper No. 89510, posted 24 Oct 2018 06:25 UTC Article for Economia Politica, October 2018 Research and innovation policy in Italy Leopoldo Nascia, Mario Pianta Leopoldo Nascia: Istat, Roma. Mario Pianta: Scuola Normale Superiore, [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract Italy’s research and innovation are examined in this article moving from the structure of the country’s economy and innovation system, examining the dynamics of private and public activities and the impact of policies. As a result of the long recession started in 2008, industrial production and investment experienced dramatic reductions, weakening business performances in R&D and innovation; policies have relied on ‘horizontal’ tax incentives for R&D, patenting and new machinery, with limited effects. Austerity-driven reduction of public expenditure has led to major cuts in public R&D and university budgets, combined with new rules for evaluation and merit- based financing. As a result, gaps between Italy’s research and innovation and EU average performances have increased. Four key policy questions are identified: the possibility for Italians firms to grow with modest technological activities; the longer term impact of underfunding the public R&D and university system; the consequences of a low presence of university graduates in the labour force; the sustainability of the increasing regional divergence within Italy’s research and innovation system. Keywords: R&D, innovation, technology policy, Italy JEL codes: L6, L8, O31, O33, O52 1. -
Italy 2017 Including an In-Depth Review on the Prevention and Correction of Macroeconomic Imbalances
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.2.2017 SWD(2017) 77 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Italy 2017 Including an In-Depth Review on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2017 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 {COM(2017) 90 final} {SWD(2017) 67 final to SWD(2017) 93 final} EN EN CONTENTS Executive summary 1 1. Economic situation and outlook 5 2. Progress with country-specific recommendations 13 3. Summary of the main findings from the MIP in-depth review 19 4. Reform priorities 26 4.1. Public finances and taxation 26 4.2. Financial sector 31 4.3. Labour market, education and social policies 40 4.4. Investment 48 4.5. Sectoral policies 52 4.6. Public administration 57 A. Overview table 61 B. MIP Scoreboard 69 C. Standard tables 70 References 75 LIST OF TABLES 1.1 Key economic, financial and social indicators for Italy social indicators for Ital 13 2.1 Summary table on 2016 CSR assessment 16 3.1. MIP Assessment Matrix (*) - Italy 24 4.2.1. Italian banking sector key indicators 32 4.2.2. Key indicators on the Italian banking sector by segment, Q2 2016 33 4.2.3. Bank bonds by seniority, holding sector and size of issuing bank, Q2 2016 34 B.1. MIP scoreboard - Italy 69 C.1. Financial market indicators 70 C.2. -
Department of Political Science the Italian Parliamentarism and The
Department of Political Science Master’s Degree in International Relations Chair of Comparative Public Law The Italian Parliamentarism and the Romanian Semi-presidentialism in a comparative perspective. Interesting similarities in two different forms of government. Prof. Cristina Fasone Prof. Giovanni Piccirilli SUPERVISOR CO - SUPERVISOR Teodora Ioana Vulpe ID 636682 CANDIDATE Academic Year 2019/2020 Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 2 Forms of Government, definition, classification and a comparative analysis of Parliamentarism and Semi-presidentialism ................................ 7 2.1 Definition and classifying principles ...................................................... 7 2.1.1 Separation of powers, the basis of forms of government classification ............. 7 2.1.2 Definition and contemporary classification principles ........................................ 9 2.1.3 Classification principles of questionable effectiveness ..................................... 16 2.2 Parliamentarism and Semi-presidentialism in comparative perspective 20 2.2.1 A more in-depth analysis of the parliamentary form of government ............... 20 2.2.2 The parliamentary process of rationalization and its misinterpretations ......... 28 2.2.3 A more in-depth analysis of the semi-presidential form of government .......... 32 2.2.4 Underlining similarities -
Research and Innovation Policy in Italy
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Munich RePEc Personal Archive MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Research and innovation policy in Italy Leopoldo Nascia and Mario Pianta Universit`aRoma Tre, Scuola Normale Superiore, Istat 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89510/ MPRA Paper No. 89510, posted 24 October 2018 06:25 UTC Article for Economia Politica, October 2018 Research and innovation policy in Italy Leopoldo Nascia, Mario Pianta Leopoldo Nascia: Istat, Roma. Mario Pianta: Scuola Normale Superiore, [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract Italy’s research and innovation are examined in this article moving from the structure of the country’s economy and innovation system, examining the dynamics of private and public activities and the impact of policies. As a result of the long recession started in 2008, industrial production and investment experienced dramatic reductions, weakening business performances in R&D and innovation; policies have relied on ‘horizontal’ tax incentives for R&D, patenting and new machinery, with limited effects. Austerity-driven reduction of public expenditure has led to major cuts in public R&D and university budgets, combined with new rules for evaluation and merit- based financing. As a result, gaps between Italy’s research and innovation and EU average performances have increased. Four key policy questions are identified: the possibility for Italians firms to grow with modest technological activities; the longer term impact of underfunding the public R&D and university system; the consequences of a low presence of university graduates in the labour force; the sustainability of the increasing regional divergence within Italy’s research and innovation system.