DOCSLIB.ORG

Council File 09-2213 Re: Proposed Declaw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Council File 09-2213 Re: Proposed Declaw Re: Council File 09-2213 Re: Proposed declaw ban (scheduled for consideration on Nov 2, 2009) We request the attached information be provided to the Councilmembers. Please contact me if you need additional information. Jim Jensvold The Paw Project 818 404 1633 The Paw Project ● PO Box 445, Santa Monica, CA 90406 ● [email protected] ● (877) PAW-PROJECT Partial list of countries with laws against declawing: United Kingdom Click here: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2006/pdf/ukpga_20060045_en.pdf Section 5: Mutilation (1) A person commits an offence if— (a) he carries out a prohibited procedure on a protected animal; (b) he causes such a procedure to be carried out on such an animal. (2) A person commits an offence if— (a) he is responsible for an animal, (b) another person carries out a prohibited procedure on the animal, and (c) he permitted that to happen or failed to take such steps (whether by way of supervising the other person or otherwise) as were reasonable in all the circumstances to prevent that happening. (3) References in this section to the carrying out of a prohibited procedure on an animal are to the carrying out of a procedure which involves interference with the sensitive tissues or bone structure of the animal, otherwise than for the purpose of its medical treatment. Switzerland http://www.animallaw.info/nonus/statutes/stchapa1978.htm Section 8: Prohibited Practices Article 22. 2. It is also forbidden: g. to cut off the claws of cats and other felines, to clip or prick the ears of dogs, to remove the vocal organs or employ other methods to prevent animals from giving tongue or reacting to pain in another audible manner; Austria http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_2004_1_118/ERV_2004_1_118.pdf § 7. (1) Interventions carried out for other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes or for the expert marking of animals in accordance with legal regulations applicable, are prohibited, in particular 5. declawing and defanging, Germany http://www.animallaw.info/nonus/statutes/stdeawa1998.htm Article 6 (1) The amputation of all or part of parts of the body or the removal or destruction of all or parts of organs or tissues of a vertebrate shall be prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply if: 1. the operation in the specific case a) is necessary according to veterinary indication... Sweden http://www.sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/09/03/10/f07ee736.pdf Surgical procedures etc. Section 10 (1) Animals must not be subjected to surgical procedures or given injections except where they are necessary for veterinary medical reasons. The Paw Project ● PO Box 445, Santa Monica, CA 90406 ● [email protected] ● (877) PAW-PROJECT Croatia http://www.prijatelji-zivotinja.hr/index.en.php?id=470 Procedures prohibited for the purpose of protecting animals Article 4 (2) It is prohibited to: 17. cut off sensitive parts of the body of live animals, Interventions on animals Article 8 (1) The partial or total amputation of a sensitive part of the body of an animal shall be prohibited, including: 1. the marking of animals contrary to the provisions of special regulations, 2. ear cropping and tail docking in dogs, declawing of cats, devocalisation and other interventions aimed at changing the phenotypic appearance of the animal. (2) By way of derogation from the provision of paragraph 1 of this Article, the partial or total amputation or removal of a sensitive part of the body of an animal shall be permitted if performed with prior anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia and if an intervention: 1. is justified for animal health reasons Malta http://www.commonlii.org/mt/legis/consol_act/awa128.pdf Part V - Surgical Operations on Animals Surgical operations. 9. (1) Surgical operations for the purpose of modifying the appearance of an animal by which any part of the animal’s body is removed or damaged, other than for a curative purpose, shall be illegal. Other localities that ban declawing are: Catalonia, Spain http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0623/p15s02-woeu.html Rome, Italy http://articles.latimes.com/2005/nov/09/world/fg-pets9 Council of Europe http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/125.htm Article 10 – Surgical operations 1. Surgical operations for the purpose of modifying the appearance of a pet animal or for other non- curative purposes shall be prohibited and, in particular: a. the docking of tails; b. the cropping of ears; c. devocalisation; d. declawing and defanging; The signatories to this convention as of 6/16/2009 were: Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=125&CM=8&DF=6/16/2009&CL=E NG The Paw Project ● PO Box 445, Santa Monica, CA 90406 ● [email protected] ● (877) PAW-PROJECT World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) There are also a number of national veterinary associations that are signatories to the WSAVA Conventions. In those countries veterinarians find declawing, as it is commonly performed in the US, unethical. http://www.wsava.org/Conventi.htm Section 10 Non-therapeutic surgical operations on companion animals i) Surgical operations for the purpose of modifying the appearance of a companion animal for non-therapeutic purposes should be actively discouraged. ii) Where possible legislation should be enacted to prohibit the performance of non-therapeutic surgical procedures for purely cosmetic purposes, in particular; a. Docking of tails; b. Cropping of ears; c. Devocalisation; d. Declawing and defanging. iii) Exceptions to these prohibitions should be permitted only: a. If a veterinarian considers that the particular surgical procedure is necessary, either for veterinary medical reasons or where euthanasia is the only alternative.... These are the signatory organizations (note: the AVMA is not a signatory): Argentina - AVEACA Asociación de Veterinarios Especialistas en Animales de Compañía de Argentina Australia - AVA Australian Veterinary Association Austria - VOEK Vereinigung Oesterreichischer Kleintiermadiziner Belgium - SAVAB Small Animal Veterinary Association Belgium Bosnia Herzegovina - BHSAVA Bosnia-Herzegovina Small Animal Veterinary Association British Columbia - BCVMA British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association Columbia - VEPA Columbias Croatia - CSAVS Croatian Small Animal Veterinary Section Czech Republic - CSAVA Czech Small Animal Veterinary Association Denmark - DSAVA Danish Small Animal Veterinary Association Estonia - ESAVA Estonian Small Animal Veterinary Association Finland - FAVP Finnish Association of Veterinary Practitioners Greece - HVMS Hellenic Veterinary Multinational Society Hong Kong - HKVA Hong Kong Veterinary Association Hungary - HSAVA Hungarian Small Animal Veterinary Association Ireland - VICAS Veterinary Ireland Companion Animal Society Israel - ICAVA Israel Companion Animal Veterinary Association Italy - AIVPA Associazione Italiana Veterinari Piccoli Animali Italy - SCIVAC Società Culturale Italiana Veterinari per Animali da Compagnia Japan - JSAVA Japanese Small Animal Veterinary Association Lithhuania - LSAVA Lithuanian Small Animal Veterinary Association Malaysia - Malaysia Small Animal Veterinary Association (MSAVA) Mexico - AMMVEPE Asociación Mexicana de Médicos Veterinarios Especialistas en Pequeñas Especies Netherlands - NACAM Netherlands Association for Companion Animal Medicine New Zealand - NZVA CAS New Zealand Veterinary Association - Companion Animal Society Norway - NSAVA Norwegian Small Animal Veterinary Association Poland - PSAVA Polish Small Animal Veterinary Association South Africa - SAVA South African Veterinary Association Spain - AVEPA Asociación de Veterinarios Españoles Especialistas en Pequeños Animales Taiwan - TVMA Taipei Veterinary Medical Association United Kingdom - BSAVA British Small Animal Veterinary Association Uruguay - SUVEPA La Sociedad Uruguaya de Veterinarios Especialistas en Pequeños Animales IVENTA International Veterinary Ear Nose and Throat Association The Paw Project ● PO Box 445, Santa Monica, CA 90406 ● [email protected] ● (877) PAW-PROJECT POSITIONS ON DECLAWING Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association (HSVMA) "The Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association is opposed to cosmetic surgeries and to those performed to correct 'vices.' Declawing generally is unacceptable because the suffering and disfigurement it causes is not offset by any benefits to the cat. Declawing is done strictly to provide convenience for people." American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) "Declawing is expensive, painful surgery. Think of it as having the first joint of all your fingers removed. And because their first line of defense has been taken away, declawed cats may resort to biting more often than their intact counterparts. Some veterinarians around the country refuse to perform declawing surgery." Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) "The pain and expense of this surgical procedure are unnecessary. Educated cat owners can easily train their cats to use their claws in a manner that allows cat and owner to happily coexist" San Francisco Animal Care and Control Department "Cats use their claws to exercise, play, stretch, climb, hunt, and mark their territory. Although your cat might use your hands or furniture for these activities, declawing is NOT the answer. Declawing is a painful and difficult operation. It is the same as removing the first joint on all your fingers. It impairs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislation Prohibiting the Declawing of Cats and Other Animals
    CONTACT POLICY DEPARTMENT MARIA CILENTI 212.382.6655 | [email protected] ELIZABETH KOCIENDA 212.382.4788 | [email protected] REPORT ON LEGISLATION BY THE ANIMAL LAW COMMITTEE A.1303 -B M. of A. L. Rosenthal S.5532-B Sen. Gianaris AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to the declawing of cats. THIS LEGISLATION IS APPROVED I. INTRODUCTION Since 2014, the Animal Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association (“City Bar”) has been studying the controversial veterinary procedures of onychectomy, phalangectomy, and tendonectomy that are performed on cats; these procedures are commonly referred to as “declawing.” We have made significant efforts to learn about and consider arguments in favor of and against a law prohibiting these procedures, including studying international, federal, and local laws that prohibit declawing, reviewing opinions of veterinary medical associations and animal welfare organizations, consulting with veterinarians and shelters, screening a documentary film for public discussion, reviewing briefs and opinions of governmental entities and other bar associations, and speaking to owners of declawed cats. On February 5, 2018, the Animal Law Committee held a public program in which we invited speakers on both sides of the issue to discuss the practice and the prospect of banning these procedures by law. All of the speakers agreed that alternatives exist that can spare cats from this serious medical procedure, though some in the field think that a cat owner should have the right to declaw if that owner would otherwise relinquish the cat.1 Since 2014 when the Animal Law Committee began considering declawing, there have been significant developments that influenced our decision to support legislation to ban the procedure at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cat Lover's Anti-Declawing Handbook by Jean Hofve, DVM
    1 This book is dedicated to the tens of millions of cats who have suffered due to ignorance and greed… and to the advocates who are working tirelessly to make sure that the cruelty stops. 2 The Cat Lover's Anti-Declawing Handbook By Jean Hofve, DVM Important Stuff, please read! This ebook was written to help cat lovers in the United States and Canada get the barbaric procedure of declawing banned by law. Please feel free to copy and share this ebook with other cat lovers! I am happy to give this ebook away for free, but please understand that it took hundreds of hours of research and hard work to produce. If you find it helpful, please consider donating to Little Big Cat (www.littlebigcat.com), COP Cats Initiative (www.copcats.org), or the Paw Project (www.pawproject.org) to support these efforts to stop declawing. This ebook does not constitute veterinary advice; readers should consult their veterinarian for specific advice concerning their cat’s health. The author and the publisher shall not be liable for any loss or injury to any party resulting from reliance on any information contained in this book, or with respect to any information on any websites to which this book may refer, or be related, or link to. If you have questions about your cat’s health or behavior, or if your cat has a medical issue, please consult your veterinarian. © 2017 Jean Hofve, DVM. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Hb466 Testimony Cpc 02-02-15
    TO: Honorable Chair McKelvey, Vice-Chair Woodson and Committee Members House Consumer Protection and Commerce Committee, 2-2-15, 2pm RE: SUPPORT for HB 466; Relating to Cruelty to Animals Submitted by: Inga Gibson, Hawaii State Director, The Humane Society of the United States, P.O. Box 89131, Honolulu, HI 96830, [email protected], 808-922-9910 _____________________________________________________________________________________ On behalf of our members and supporters of The Humane Society of the United States in Hawaii, we thank you for the opportunity to speak in support of HB 466, and your consideration of the below amendments. HB466 would prohibit veterinarians and non-veterinarians from performing declawing on cats except for medical reasons. Too often, people think that declawing is a simple surgery that removes a cat's nails—the equivalent of having your fingernails trimmed. Sadly, this is far from the truth. Declawing involves the amputation of the last bone of each toe. If performed on a human being, it would be like cutting off each finger at the last knuckle. Declawed cats often exhibit negative physical and behavioral problems long after the procedure. Declawing has long been prohibited in the European Union, Israel, Japan, Australia and other countries. In addition, it has long been illegal to declaw wild cats in the U.S. Unfortunately, an even more prevalent “procedure” is being performed on pets across Hawaii; painful ear-cropping, by unlicensed persons, and without the use of necessary anesthetics or infection prevention medications. We respectfully request the Committee amend HB 466, suggested below, to also include a prohibition on ear-cropping.
    [Show full text]
  • Soa 3 2005.Fin
    Indoor Cats, Scratching, and the Debate over Declawing: When 3CHAPTER Normal Pet Behavior Becomes a Problem Katherine C. (Kasey) Grier and Nancy Peterson hen pet animals share to stress that they enjoy the com- mousers. The U.S. Post Office our living spaces, their panionship of pet animals in their owned what one observer called Wneeds and natural behav- homes; pointing out the complexi- “quite an army of cats” to protect iors sometimes are at odds with ties and contradictions in living the mail; postmasters in large the varying standards for house- with pet cats is intended to cities even had budgets for “cat hold appearance, sanitation, and acknowledge the historical, socially meat” (this being food for cats, not polite social life that Americans constructed, and changeable char- food from cats). Around markets have established over time. How acter of pet keeping and to encour- and stables and anywhere grain pet owners have resolved these age people involved in companion was stored to service livestock, issues provides insight into their animal welfare work to consider cats were present (Grier, in press). changing ideas about the role of why some practices can be promot- Although the majority of Ameri- animals in their households and ed or simply tolerated, while others can cats still worked for a living as suggests how much, or how little, are problematic. late as the 1940s (Jones 2003), people may actually know about some families enjoyed the compa- the biological behaviors and psy- ny of what memoirist Samuel chological needs of the creatures The History of Canby Rumford of Wilmington, they care for.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Declawing and Tooth· Removal (Issued in August 2006)
    USDA Information Sheet on Declawing and Tooth· Removal (Issued in August 2006) Declawing or the removal ofthe canine teeth (fangs) in wild or exotic carnivores or nonhuman primates is no longer considered to be appropriate veterinary care unless prescribed by the attending veterinarian for treatment ofindividual medical problems ofthe paws or teeth. These procedures are no longer considered to be acceptable when performed solely for handling or husbandry purposes since they can cause considerable pain and discomfort to the animal and may result in chronic health problems. These procedures are no longer allowed under the Animal Welfare Act. This notice is consistent with the current position statement issued by the American Veterinary Medical Association. L.- -'-__-J What animals does this apply to? This applies to all regulated nonhuman primates and captive wild or exotic carnivores, including, but not limited to, big cats, canid species, and bears. Who does this apply to? This policy applies to all AWA licensees (breeders, dealers, and exhibitors) and registrants (research facilities). What does this mean to the licensee or registrant? All AWA licensees must no longer routinely perform these procedures (declawing and removal ofcanine teeth) on their wild or exotic carnivores and nonhuman primates. Continuing to routinely use these procedures may subject the licensee to citation for noncompliance with the AWA, and may result in enforcement action. Treatment ofindividual animals with documented medical problems as prescribed by the attending veterinarian is not subject to these restrictions. Registrants may use such procedures only as part ofa research protocol that has been reviewed and approved by the IACUC at the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • CE V6 N23 Dolby
    Critical Education Volume 6 Number 23 December 15, 2015 ISSN 1920-4125 The Paw Project Animals and Critical Education in the Public Sphere Nadine Dolby Purdue University Citation: Dolby, N. (2015). The paw project: Animals and critical education in the public sphere Critical Education, 6(23). Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/186000 Abstract The practice of cat declawing is intertwined with how both veterinarians and the public are educated and socialized to make sense of non-human animals and the relationship between humans and non-human animals. In this article, I first discuss critical education in the public sphere and then review the history of the veterinary profession and how its hidden curriculum has intersected with three different ways of valuing animals through the lenses of animal health, animal welfare and animal rights. In recent years, successful critical public education efforts are changing the way that people think about non-human animals and their use (and abuse) for human ends. I then describe the history of cat declawing in the United States and how The Paw Project is reshaping the public conversation around this controversial practice, examining how it can be understood as an important critical education project in the public sphere. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute this article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Critical Education, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. More details of this Creative Commons license are available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/3.0/.
    [Show full text]