Cryptocurrency: a New Investment Opportunity? David Kuo Chuen LEE Singapore University of Social Sciences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cryptocurrency: a New Investment Opportunity? David Kuo Chuen LEE Singapore University of Social Sciences Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Lee Kong Chian School of Business Business 3-2018 Cryptocurrency: A new investment opportunity? David Kuo Chuen LEE Singapore University of Social Sciences Li GUO Singapore Management University, [email protected] Yu WANG Singapore University of Social Sciences DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2018.20.3.016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Citation LEE, David Kuo Chuen; GUO, Li; and WANG, Yu. Cryptocurrency: A new investment opportunity?. (2018). Journal of Alternative Investments. 20, (3), 16-40. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5784 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Published in Journal of Alternative Investments, Winter 2018, 20 (3) 16-40. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2018.20.3.016 Cryptocurrency: A New Investment Opportunity? DAVID LEE KUO CHUEN, LI GUO, AND YU WANG 1 DAVID LEE KUO he invention of Bitcoin by Satoshi will argue that their value is higher than Linux CHUEN Nakamoto (Nakamoto [2008]) and lower than the Internet—yet both are is a professor at Singapore in 2008 spurred the creation facilitators rather than an asset class. Finance University of Social Sciences in Singapore, of many new cryptocurrencies traditionalists will argue that cryptocurrency Tknown as altcoins. These altcoins use similar is just another form of value transfer that raises and 2015 Fulbright visiting scholar at Stanford cryptographhy technology but employ dif- funds globally using cryptography and creates University in Stanford, ferent algorithmic designs. Many of these little value beyond that. For perspective, with CA. altcoins were invented for different purposes US$40 billion and US$100 billion market [email protected] or to address the pain points of the Bitcoin capitalization for bitcoin and total cryptocur- LI GUO network, such as the high usage of energy rency, respectively, this investable asset class is is a PhD candidate in the caused by its proof of work (PoW) consensus minute in size compared to the US$66.8 tril- Lee Kong Chian School algorithm or the supply limit of 21 million lion and US$48.2 trillion for listed equity and of Business at Singapore coins, among others. As the network effect gold, respectively. Management University weighs in, the prices of bitcoin and its vari- Cryptocurrency is a subset of the class in Singapore. [email protected] ants have risen in tandem. These innovations of digital currency (Lee [2015]), but it has and the perceived investment potential have become an important type of digital cur- YU WANG led to rapid growth in the number of alt- rency. Unlike other digital currencies that is a research fellow at the coins and the market size of cryptocurrency. can be centrally issued, circulated within a Singapore University According to CoinMarketCap,2 nearly 869 community or geographical location, or tied of Social Science in cryptocurrencies are currently trading around to fiat currency or the organizations issuing Singapore. [email protected] the world with a combined market capital- them, cryptocurrency has very different ization of US$148.3 billion by circulating characteristics. The blockchain technology supply and US$321.5 billion by total supply used by cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, is as of October 6, 2017. The price of bitcoin an open distributed ledger that records trans- surged to US$4,780.15 on September 2, 2017. actions. This solves the double-spending Many have argued that, despite their payment problem and does not require a trusted third utility, bitcoin and cryptocurrencies have no party. Decentralization allows the block- intrinsic value and may be the perfect vehicle chain technology to have increased capacity, for forming a bubble. better security, and faster settlement. Some Even for those who believe that there is of these features are at the top of the list of intrinsic value to cryptocurrencies, when their shortcomings of traditional financial systems. prices are rising, there will be doubts about As a result, blockchains and cryptocurrencies prices running ahead of values. Technologists have become two of the most pressing topics 16 CRYPTOCURRENCY: A NEW INVESTMENT OPPORTUniTY? WINTER 2018 in the financial industry. In this article, we focus on sentiment-induced mispricing. To further explore the the diversification role of cryptocurrencies and explore sentiment effect, we use the Fama–MacBeth regression the possibility that they may generate new investment (Fama and MacBeth [1973]) to examine the cross- opportunities based on historical data. sectional premium of investor sentiment by using the We first evaluate the comovement between tra- top 100 cryptocurrencies that are components of CRIX. ditional asset classes and the cryptocurrency index After controlling trading volume and lagged return, the (CRIX) by studying their correlation coefficients (Chen Fama–MacBeth results suggest that any cryptocurrency et al. [2016]). Results suggest a very low correlation with 1% investor sentiment in excess of the average between CRIX and traditional assets based on historical cryptocurrency sentiment tends to have a 0.38% lower data. This observation suggests that cryptocurrency as an future return compared to the entire cryptocurrency asset class is a good diversifier in a traditional portfolio. portfolio. As a result, we identify potential profits from We then employ a multivariate dynamic conditional using daily trading strategies based on investor senti- correlation (DCC) model to examine dynamic comove- ment. The strategy that buys low-sentiment and sells ments for robustness (Engle [2002]). Consistent with our high-sentiment cryptocurrencies generates an annual- expectations, cryptocurrencies are considered a poten- ized return of 8.54 with a Sharpe ratio of 11.64. We also tially better portfolio diversifier under the DCC setting. conduct two analyses to assess the robustness of our find- The largest DCC was between CRIX and gold, with a ings. Our sentiment strategy survives after assuming rea- value of 0.24. Next, we investigate whether the inclusion sonable transaction costs from 1 to 10 bps per trade. The of cryptocurrencies in a traditional portfolio will lead to result is not sensitive to the selection of formation period additional benefits in terms of risk-adjusted returns. Our of investor sentiment. The average annualized return empirical results show that CRIX not only expands the remains more than 11% with a t-value >15. Overall, efficient frontier of an initial portfolio consisting only our results provide some evidence of cryptocurrencies of traditional assets, it also provides additional utility to being a potential candidate as a new investment vehicle. investors, as evidenced by the mean–variance spanning The rest of the article is organized as follows. We first test. However, it seems that cryptocurrencies may not introduce the background of the cryptocurrency market. lead to a large improvement in the utility of a mean– The next section presents empirical results on the diver- variance investor. There are various explanations for this sification role of cryptocurrencies, and the following sec- finding. First, the current sample period of CRIX is tion explains the sentiment impact on the cryptocurrency too short to fully explore the investment opportunity market with robustness checks. The last section concludes. of cryptocurrencies. Second, over the sample period, the cryptocurrency market is too volatile, with a daily CRYPTOCURRENCY maximum drawdown of 22%. Hence, it is important for investors to understand the return–risk structure of From Centralization to Decentralization cryptocurrencies before making an investment com- mitment. In this article, we conjecture that the high The major drawback of the traditional fiat cur- volatility of cryptocurrency is driven mainly by investor rency payment system is high transaction fees with a sentiment, not by a change in fundamentals. We do not long settlement period, which has led people to alterna- argue that there are no fundamentals, but rather that tive currencies that allow for shorter peer-to-peer (P2P) there has not been any meaningful interpretation using processing time without intermediaries, resulting in a traditional fundamental analysis. Either the old economy thriving market for digital currencies that have lower framework is not suitable for a new and complex tech- settlement risk. Prior to the creation of cryptocurrencies, nology such as cryptocurrency, or immeasurable fun- there were many other types of digital currencies. The damentals are proxied by sentiments. most common example is a digital currency created by We then propose an investor sentiment measure an institution and transacted on a platform. Such curren- based on the past average returns for the cryptocur- cies can be loyalty points created by companies or digital rency market. Our measure
Recommended publications
  • YEUNG-DOCUMENT-2019.Pdf (478.1Kb)
    Useful Computation on the Block Chain The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Yeung, Fuk. 2019. Useful Computation on the Block Chain. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37364565 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 111 Useful Computation on the Block Chain Fuk Yeung A Thesis in the Field of Information Technology for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2019 Copyright 2019 [Fuk Yeung] Abstract The recent growth of blockchain technology and its usage has increased the size of cryptocurrency networks. However, this increase has come at the cost of high energy consumption due to the processing power needed to maintain large cryptocurrency networks. In the largest networks, this processing power is attributed to wasted computations centered around solving a Proof of Work algorithm. There have been several attempts to address this problem and it is an area of continuing improvement. We will present a summary of proposed solutions as well as an in-depth look at a promising alternative algorithm known as Proof of Useful Work. This solution will redirect wasted computation towards useful work. We will show that this is a viable alternative to Proof of Work. Dedication Thank you to everyone who has supported me throughout the process of writing this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Complementary Currencies: Mutual Credit Currency Systems and the Challenge of Globalization
    Complementary Currencies: Mutual Credit Currency Systems and the Challenge of Globalization Clare Lascelles1 Abstract Complementary currencies—currencies operating alongside the official currency—have taken many forms throughout the last century or so. While their existence has a rich history, complementary currencies are increasingly viewed as anachronistic in a world where the forces of globalization promote further integration between economies and societies. Even so, towns across the globe have recently witnessed the introduction of complementary currencies in their region, which connotes a renewed emphasis on local identity. This paper explores the rationale behind the modern-day adoption of complementary currencies in a globalized system. I. Introduction Coined money has two sides: heads and tails. ‘Heads’ represents the state authority that issued the coin, while ‘tails’ displays the value of the coin as a medium of exchange. This duality—the “product of social organization both from the top down (‘states’) and from the bottom up (‘markets’)”—reveals the coin as “both a token of authority and a commodity with a price” (Hart, 1986). Yet, even as side ‘heads’ reminds us of the central authority that underwrote the coin, currency can exist outside state control. Indeed, as globalization exerts pressure toward financial integration, complementary currencies—currencies existing alongside the official currency—have become common in small towns and regions. This paper examines the rationale behind complementary currencies, with a focus on mutual credit currency, and concludes that the modern-day adoption of complementary currencies can be attributed to the depersonalizing force of globalization. II. Literature Review Money is certainly not a topic unstudied.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence Integrated Blockchain Technology for Decentralized Applications and Smart Contracts
    International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No.02, (2020), pp. 1023-1031 Artificial Intelligence Integrated Blockchain Technology for Decentralized Applications and Smart Contracts MAAN NAWAF ABBOOD Al-Imam Al-Adham college Abstract In the present period, Blockchain Technology is one of the key regions of research just as execution explicitly in the space of Cryptocurrency. Presently days, various advanced digital forms of money are very conspicuous and shared all through the world in spite of enormous analysis and debates. These cryptographic forms of money incorporate BitCoin, Ethereum, LiteCoin, PeerCoin, GridCoin, PrimeCoin, Ripple, Nxt, DogeCoin, NameCoin, AuroraCoin, Dash, Neo, NEM, PotCoin, TitCoin, Verge, Stellar, VertCoin, Tether, Zcash and numerous others. These blockchain based digital forms of money don't have any middle of the road bank or installment passage to record the log of the transactions. That is the primary reason in light of which numerous nations are not permitting the cryptographic forms of money as legitimate cash transaction. In any case, these blockchain based cryptographic forms of money are extremely celebrated and utilized as a result of colossal security highlights. This manuscript is focusing on the blockchain technology that is directly associated as the application domain of artificial intelligence. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, AI, AI based Blockchain, Blockchain Security Introduction The blockchain organize is having a square of records in which every single record is related with the dynamic cryptography so every one of the transactions can be scrambled with no likelihood of sniffing or hacking endeavors [1, 2]. In current situation, the blockchain innovation is progressively engaged towards cryptographic forms of money in which the disseminated record is kept up for the transactions [3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Review A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets Nikolaos A. Kyriazis Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece; [email protected] Abstract: This study is an integrated survey of GARCH methodologies applications on 67 empirical papers that focus on cryptocurrencies. More sophisticated GARCH models are found to better explain the fluctuations in the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The main characteristics and the optimal approaches for modeling returns and volatility of cryptocurrencies are under scrutiny. Moreover, emphasis is placed on interconnectedness and hedging and/or diversifying abilities, measurement of profit-making and risk, efficiency and herding behavior. This leads to fruitful results and sheds light on a broad spectrum of aspects. In-depth analysis is provided of the speculative character of digital currencies and the possibility of improvement of the risk–return trade-off in investors’ portfolios. Overall, it is found that the inclusion of Bitcoin in portfolios with conventional assets could significantly improve the risk–return trade-off of investors’ decisions. Results on whether Bitcoin resembles gold are split. The same is true about whether Bitcoins volatility presents larger reactions to positive or negative shocks. Cryptocurrency markets are found not to be efficient. This study provides a roadmap for researchers and investors as well as authorities. Keywords: decentralized cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; survey; volatility modelling Citation: Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2021. A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets. Journal of Risk and 1. Introduction Financial Management 14: 293. The continuing evolution of cryptocurrency markets and exchanges during the last few https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm years has aroused sparkling interest amid academic researchers, monetary policymakers, 14070293 regulators, investors and the financial press.
    [Show full text]
  • Impossibility of Full Decentralization in Permissionless Blockchains
    Impossibility of Full Decentralization in Permissionless Blockchains Yujin Kwon*, Jian Liuy, Minjeong Kim*, Dawn Songy, Yongdae Kim* *KAIST {dbwls8724,mjkim9394,yongdaek}@kaist.ac.kr yUC Berkeley [email protected],[email protected] ABSTRACT between achieving good decentralization in the consensus protocol Bitcoin uses the proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism where nodes earn and not relying on a TTP exists. rewards in return for the use of their computing resources. Although this incentive system has attracted many participants, power has, CCS CONCEPTS at the same time, been significantly biased towards a few nodes, • Security and privacy → Economics of security and privacy; called mining pools. In addition, poor decentralization appears not Distributed systems security; only in PoW-based coins but also in coins that adopt proof-of-stake (PoS) and delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) mechanisms. KEYWORDS In this paper, we address the issue of centralization in the consen- Blockchain; Consensus Protocol; Decentralization sus protocol. To this end, we first define ¹m; ε; δº-decentralization as a state satisfying that 1) there are at least m participants running 1 INTRODUCTION a node, and 2) the ratio between the total resource power of nodes Traditional currencies have a centralized structure, and thus there run by the richest and the δ-th percentile participants is less than exist several problems such as a single point of failure and corrup- or equal to 1 + ε. Therefore, when m is sufficiently large, and ε and tion. For example, the global financial crisis in 2008 was aggravated δ are 0, ¹m; ε; δº-decentralization represents full decentralization, by the flawed policies of banks that eventually led to many bank which is an ideal state.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 23 - Issue 2
    IJCCR International Journal of Community Currency Research SUMMER 2019 VOLUME 23 - ISSUE 2 www.ijccr.net IJCCR 23 (Summer 2019) – ISSUE 2 Editorial 1 Georgina M. Gómez Transforming or reproducing an unequal economy? Solidarity and inequality 2-16 in a community currency Ester Barinaga Key Factors for the Durability of Community Currencies: An NPO Management 17-34 Perspective Jeremy September Sidechain and volatility of cryptocurrencies based on the blockchain 35-44 technology Olivier Hueber Social representations of money: contrast between citizens and local 45-62 complementary currency members Ariane Tichit INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY CURRENCY RESEARCH 2017 VOLUME 23 (SUMMER) 1 International Journal of Community Currency Research VOLUME 23 (SUMMER) 1 EDITORIAL Georgina M. Gómez (*) Chief Editor International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (*) [email protected] The International Journal of Community Currency Research was founded 23 years ago, when researchers on this topic found a hard time in getting published in other peer reviewed journals. In these two decades the academic publishing industry has exploded and most papers can be published internationally with a minimal peer-review scrutiny, for a fee. Moreover, complementary currency research is not perceived as extravagant as it used to be, so it has now become possible to get published in journals with excellent reputation. In that context, the IJCCR is still the first point of contact of practitioners and new researchers on this topic. It offers open access, free publication, and it is run on a voluntary basis by established scholars in the field. In any of the last five years, it has received about 25000 views.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Applied Perspective to Blockchain Technology: a Comprehensive Survey
    applied sciences Review Research and Applied Perspective to Blockchain Technology: A Comprehensive Survey Sumaira Johar 1,* , Naveed Ahmad 1, Warda Asher 1, Haitham Cruickshank 2 and Amad Durrani 1 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan; [email protected] (N.A.); [email protected] (W.A.); [email protected] (A.D.) 2 Institute of Communication Systems, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7JP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Blockchain being a leading technology in the 21st century is revolutionizing each sector of life. Services are being provided and upgraded using its salient features and fruitful characteristics. Businesses are being enhanced by using this technology. Countries are shifting towards digital cur- rencies i.e., an initial application of blockchain application. It omits the need of central authority by its distributed ledger functionality. This distributed ledger is achieved by using a consensus mechanism in blockchain. A consensus algorithm plays a core role in the implementation of blockchain. Any application implementing blockchain uses consensus algorithms to achieve its desired task. In this paper, we focus on provisioning of a comparative analysis of blockchain’s consensus algorithms with respect to the type of application. Furthermore, we discuss the development platforms as well as technologies of blockchain. The aim of the paper is to provide knowledge from basic to extensive from blockchain architecture to consensus methods, from applications to development platform, from challenges and issues to blockchain research gaps in various areas. Citation: Johar, S.; Ahmad, N.; Keywords: blockchain; applications; consensus mechanisms Asher, W.; Cruickshank, H.; Durrani, A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macro-Economics of Crypto-Currencies: Balancing Entrepreneurialism and Monetary Policy
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP & POLICY WORKING PAPER SERIES The Macro-Economics of Crypto-Currencies: Balancing Entrepreneurialism and Monetary Policy Eli Noam In 2016, the Nasdaq Educational Foundation awarded the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) a multi-year grant to support initiatives at the intersection of digital entrepreneurship and public policy. Over the past three years, SIPA has undertaken new research, introduced new pedagogy, launched student venture competitions, and convened policy forums that have engaged scholars across Columbia University as well as entrepreneurs and leaders from both the public and private sectors. New research has covered three broad areas: Cities & Innovation; Digital Innovation & Entrepreneurial Solutions; and Emerging Global Digital Policy. Specific topics have included global education technology; cryptocurrencies and the new technologies of money; the urban innovation environment, with a focus on New York City; government measures to support the digital economy in Brazil, Shenzhen, China, and India; and entrepreneurship focused on addressing misinformation. With special thanks to the Nasdaq Educational Foundation for its support of SIPA’s Entrepreneurship and Policy Initiative. Table of Contents Abstract . 1 1. Introduction . 2. 2. A History of Governmental and Private Moneys . 2 A. United States . 3 . B. Other Examples of Private Moneys . .4 . 3. The Emergence of Electronic Moneys . 5 A. Electronic Moneys . 5 B. Distributed Ledger Technology . 6. C. Blockchain Technology . 6 D. Cryptocurrencies. 8 E. An Illustration of a Bitcoin Transaction . 9 4. Advantages and Drawbacks of Crypto-Currencies . 10 A. Advantages . 10 B. Problems . 11 C. The Potential for Improvements . 15 5. The Impact of Cryptocurrencies on Macro-Economic Policy .
    [Show full text]
  • New Kids on the Blocks: an Analysis of Modern Blockchains
    New kids on the block: an analysis of modern blockchains Luke Anderson∗, Ralph Holz∗, Alexander Ponomarev†, Paul Rimba†, Ingo Weber† ∗University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia †Data61/CSIRO, Sydney, Australia ∗{l.anderson,ralph.holz}@sydney.edu.au †fi[email protected] ABSTRACT a network of untrusted nodes. A majority of these nodes Half a decade after Bitcoin became the first widely used need to act faithfully to the respective blockchain pro- cryptocurrency, blockchains are receiving considerable in- tocol in order to secure the operation of the blockchain terest from industry and the research community. Modern as a whole. blockchains feature services such as name registration and Bitcoin’s asset is the Bitcoin currency (BTC) and the smart contracts. Some employ new forms of consensus, such trusted centralised entity it attempts to replace is the as proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work. However, these traditional bank. Newer blockchains provide more intri- blockchains are so far relatively poorly investigated, despite cate features, such as Namecoin’s attempt at providing the fact that they move considerable assets. In this paper, we decentralised name registration, or Ethereum’s globally explore three representative, modern blockchains—Ethereum, distributed Ethereum Virtual Machine that allows ex- Namecoin, and Peercoin. Our focus is on the features that ecuting code in the form of so-called smart contracts set them apart from the pure currency use case of Bitcoin. on the Ethereum network. Perceptions of blockchains We investigate the blockchains’ activity in terms of trans- are varied, with opinions ranging from highly sceptical actions and usage patterns, identifying some curiosities in to enthusiastic.
    [Show full text]
  • Complementary Currencies: an Analysis of the Creation Process Based on Sustainable Local Development Principles
    sustainability Article Complementary Currencies: An Analysis of the Creation Process Based on Sustainable Local Development Principles Francisco Javier García-Corral 1,* , Jaime de Pablo-Valenciano 2 , Juan Milán-García 2 and José Antonio Cordero-García 3 1 Research Group: Almeria Group of Applied Economy (SEJ-147), University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain 2 Department of Business and Economics, Applied Economic Area, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain; [email protected] (J.d.P.-V.); [email protected] (J.M.-G.) 3 Department of Law, Financial and Tax Law, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 July 2020; Accepted: 13 July 2020; Published: 15 July 2020 Abstract: Complementary currencies are a reality and are being applied both globally and locally. The aim of this article is to explain the viability of this type of currency and its application in local development, in this case, in a rural mountain municipality in the province of Almería (Spain) called Almócita. The Plus, Minus, Interesting (PMI); “Flying Balloon”; and Strength, Weakness, Opportunity (SWOT) analysis methodologies will be used to carry out the study. Finally, a ranking of success factors will be carried out with a brainstorming exercise. As to the results, there are, a priori, more advantages than disadvantages of implementing these currencies, but the local population has clarified that their main concern is depopulation along with a lack of varied work. As a counterpart to this and strengths or advantages, almost all the participants mention the support from the Almócita city council and the initiatives that are constantly being promoted.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin & Other Virtual Currencies
    Delaware Attorney General Investor Protection Unit Investor Advisory: Bitcoin & Other Virtual Currencies Virtual currencies, which include digital and crypto-currencies, are gaining in both popularity and controversy. Virtual currencies can offer lower transaction fees and greater anonymity. However, virtual currencies can carry substantial risk. Virtual currencies have fluctuated wildly in value, investors have had their investments in virtual currencies stolen by hackers, and MtGox, previously the largest virtual currency exchange, recently shut down after losing more than $350 million of Bitcoin. What is Virtual Currency? Virtual currency is an electronic medium of exchange that, unlike real money, is not controlled or backed by a central government or central bank. Virtual currencies include crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin, Ripple, Litecoin, Peercoin, and Dogecoin. Such currencies can be bought or sold through virtual currency exchanges and used to purchase goods or services where accepted. Even though some companies and individuals may accept a virtual currency as a monetary equivalent, the Internal Revenue Service has announced that it would treat virtual currency as “property” and not “currency” for tax purposes. Risks Associated with Virtual Currency As with all investments, those tied to virtual currency have risk. However, buying and trading in virtual currencies carries unique risks that are not found in other investments. Some common concerns and issues you should consider before investing in any virtual currency include: Virtual currencies are not legal tender, so stores, internal controls and may be more susceptible to websites or people do not have to accept them as a fraud and theft than regulated financial institutions. form a payment.
    [Show full text]
  • D5.5 Implementation of Digital Social Currency Infrastructure
    FP7 – CAPS - 2013 D-CENT D5.5 Implementation of digital social currency infrastructure Project no. 610349 D-CENT Decentralised Citizens ENgagement Technologies Specific Targeted Research Project Collective Awareness Platforms D5.5 Implementation of digital social currency infrastructure Version Number: V1 Lead beneficiary: Dyne Due Date: 30 Sept 2015 Author(s): Denis Roio, Marco Sachy Editors and reviewers: Harry Halpin, Robert Bjarnason Dissemination level: PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Approved by: Francesca Bria Date: 30 September 2015 This report is currently awaiting approval from the EC and cannot be not considered to be a final version. Page 1 of 35 FP7 – CAPS - 2013 D-CENT D5.5 Implementation of digital social currency infrastructure Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Overview of features ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Why a toolkit ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Basic workflow ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]