Republic of Ghana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Republic of Ghana PROJECT EVALUATION Republic of Ghana Rural Enterprises Project, Phase II International Fund for Interim Evaluation Agricultural Development Via Paolo di Dono, 44 00142 Rome, Italy Tel: +39 06 54591 Fax: +39 06 54593048 October 2011 E-mail: [email protected] www.ifad.org/evaluation Document of the International Fund for Agricultural Development Republic of Ghana Rural Enterprises Project, Phase II Interim Evaluation Report No. 2494-GH October 2011 Photo on cover page: Women‟s Gari Processing Association Source: Rural Enterprises Project, Phase II Project Coordination and Monitoring Unit Republic of Ghana Rural Enterprises Project – Phase II Loan No. 588-GH Interim Evaluation Table of Contents Currency Equivalents iii Weights and Measures iii Abbreviations and Acronyms iii Map of the Project Area v Acknowledgements vii Foreword ix Executive Summary xi Agreement at Completion Point xvii I. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS 1 II. COUNTRY AND SECTOR BACKGROUND 3 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND 6 IV. IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS 9 V. PROJECT PERFORMANCE 22 A. Relevance 22 B. Effectiveness 24 C. Efficiency 28 VI. RURAL POVERTY IMPACT 31 VII. SUSTAINABILITY, INNOVATIONS AND GENDER 37 A. Sustainability 37 B. Innovation 38 C. Gender 39 VIII. PERFORMANCE OF PARTNERS 40 IX. SUMMARY OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE 42 X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 APPENDICES 1. Bibliography 49 2. Evaluation Framework 51 3. Evaluation Main Mission Itinerary 57 4. List of Persons Met during the Evaluation Mission 59 5. Mean Annual Per Capita Income by Region 71 6. Case Studies: Businesses That Have Grown 73 7. Brief on Trade/Business Associations 79 8. Rural Enterprises Project Data 83 9. Evaluation Criteria Used by the Independent Office of Evaluation 91 BOXES 1. Multiple Income Streams Bring Prosperity 33 2. Case Study: Impact of REP II on Household Income 34 3. Case Study: Control Group 34 FIGURES 1. REP II Financial Performance 12 2. Performance of the Rural Enterprise Development Fund Disbursement 19 3. REP I and REP II Evolution 43 TABLES 1. Summary of Project Performance 11 2. Total Cost Allocation (Appraisal and Actual as of March 2010) 13 3. Participating Financial Institutions Loan Report - March 2010 18 4. Adoption Rates for Training by Business Type 25 5. Income Levels Before and After REP II Support 32 6. Evaluation Ratings Summary 42 ANNEX (*) Sociocultural, Gender and Institutional Assessment (*) The annex is available upon request from the Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD. ii Currency Equivalents Monetary Unit = Ghanaian Cedi (GHC) US$ 1 – GHC 1.438 (June 2010) Weights and Measures 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds 1,000 kg = 1 metric ton (mt) 1 kilometre (km) = 0.62 mile 1 meter = 1.09 yards 1 square meter (m2) = 10.76 square feet 1 acre = 0.405 ha Fiscal Year 1 January – 31 December Abbreviations and Acronyms AfDB African Development Bank AGI Association of Ghana Industries ARB Association of Rural Banks ASSI Association of Small-Scale Industries BAC Business Advisory Centre BDS Business Development Services CIBA Council for Indigenous Business Associations COSOP country strategic opportunities programme EMU Efficiency Monitoring Unit ERR Economic Rate of Return GHC Ghana Cedis GLSS Ghana Living Standards Survey GPRS (I) Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy GPRS (II) Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy GRATIS Ghana Regional Appropriate Technology and Industrial Services IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IOE Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD IREGE Initiative for Rural Enterprises Growth and Employment Creation LTAs local trade associations MLGRD Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development MOFA Ministry of Food and Agriculture MOTI Ministry of Trade and Industry MSEs micro and small enterprises MTR Mid-Term Review NBSSI National Board for Small-Scale Industries NGOs non-governmental organizations NVTI National Vocational Training Institute PCMU Project Coordination and Monitoring Unit PFIs participating financial institutions RAFiP Rural and Agricultural Finance Programme RCC Regional Coordinating Councils REDF Rural Enterprises Development Fund iii REP I Rural Enterprises Project REP II Rural Enterprise Project, Phase II RFS Rural Financial Services RTF Rural Technology Facility (REP II) RTIMP Root and Tuber Improvement and Marketing Programme TPSAT Technology Promotion and Support to Apprenticeship Training UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services WCA West and Central Africa Division (IFAD) iv v vi Acknowledgements This interim evaluation was led and prepared by Mark Keating, Evaluation Officer, with contributions by consultants Dorothy Lucks (lead consultant), Giulia Mezzi and Ana Serwaa Dapaah. Internal peer reviewers from the Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD (Ashwani Muthoo, Katrin Aidnel and Luigi Cuna) reviewed the approach paper and the draft final report. Melba E. Alvarez, Evaluation Communication Assistant, provided administrative support. The Independent Office of Evaluation is grateful to IFAD‟s West and Central Africa Division for their insightful inputs and comments at various stages of the evaluation process. Appreciation is due to the Government of Ghana for the valuable comments and support provided throughout the evaluation process and for organizing the final learning workshop held in March 2011. __________________________________________________________ Director, Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD: Luciano Lavizzari vii viii FOREWORD The overall goal of the Ghana Rural Enterprise Project, Phase II (REP II) is to alleviate poverty and improve living conditions in the rural areas and especially increase the incomes of women and vulnerable groups through increased self- and wage employment. The project was implemented in 53 districts across the ten administrative regions in Ghana. Project interventions targeted the entrepreneurial poor through a demand-driven approach. Overall, the evaluation found that REP II was relevant to the Ghana context and has performed well. It has achieved a satisfactory level of effectiveness as well as of efficiency, particularly with regard to business service provision. The evaluation has also determined that the project has made a substantial contribution to poverty reduction within each district of operation. Such impact may not be as widespread in terms of the numbers of businesses and employees originally envisaged, but it has established a sustainable foundation for current and future poverty reduction approaches in the micro and small enterprises (MSE) sector. While the core focus of REP II is MSE sector development, through rural technology and rural finance, yet it has also played an important role in governance, as it related to local economic development and private sector institutional building and private sector value chain development. Moreover, REP II has led to the emergence of a range of innovations, for instance, the creation of MSE sub-committee of the District Assemblies to mainstream MSE development in the local government system, rotational trade shows, development of industrial estates and appointment of capable clients as local service providers. Gender was a major consideration in the project targeting strategy in accordance with the project design, with a specific focus on poor/disadvantaged women. The evaluation noted that the project’s approach has been effective, bringing about changes and improvements in culture and practices in relation to gender. On a less positive note, the level of adoption from training activities has not been as high as expected, mainly due to lack of financing. More could have been done to assist businesses to move from survival level to more proactive growth, which required intensive and continued support for those clients interested in and capable of growth. In addition, project results in rural finance have been mixed, less positive in some respects and more inspiring in others. Also, the sustainability of project interventions is mixed. While the sustainability of the Business Advisory Centers model, as well as of individual MSEs, is highly likely, the sustainability of Rural Technology Facilities and of some participating financial institutions still remains a challenge. The evaluation concluded that, overall, the project was successful. REP II was implemented with the participation of a large number of institutions at different levels of operation, which required a strong coordinating mechanism to ensure its effectiveness. In this respect, impact has been exemplary at the national and district levels. Notably, the project has led to significant policy change in support to the MSE sector and implementation of major national policies related to MSEs in the rural areas. The present completion evaluation report includes an agreement at completion point summarizing the main evaluation findings. It also presents the recommendations that were discussed and agreed to by IFAD and the Government of Ghana, together with proposals as to how and by whom they should be implemented. Luciano Lavizzari Director, Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD ix x Republic of Ghana Rural Enterprises Project – Phase II Interim Evaluation Executive Summary 1. Introduction. The interim evaluation of the Ghana Rural Enterprises Project, Phase II (REP II) was conducted by the Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD (IOE) in line with the provisions set out in the IFAD Evaluation Policy and IFAD Evaluation Manual.1 The main objectives of the evaluation were to: (i) assess the performance and impact of
Recommended publications
  • Ghana Gazette
    GHANA GAZETTE Published by Authority CONTENTS PAGE Facility with Long Term Licence … … … … … … … … … … … … 1236 Facility with Provisional Licence … … … … … … … … … … … … 201 Page | 1 HEALTH FACILITIES WITH LONG TERM LICENCE AS AT 12/01/2021 (ACCORDING TO THE HEALTH INSTITUTIONS AND FACILITIES ACT 829, 2011) TYPE OF PRACTITIONER DATE OF DATE NO NAME OF FACILITY TYPE OF FACILITY LICENCE REGION TOWN DISTRICT IN-CHARGE ISSUE EXPIRY DR. THOMAS PRIMUS 1 A1 HOSPITAL PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG TERM ASHANTI KUMASI KUMASI METROPOLITAN KPADENOU 19 June 2019 18 June 2022 PROF. JOSEPH WOAHEN 2 ACADEMY CLINIC LIMITED CLINIC LONG TERM ASHANTI ASOKORE MAMPONG KUMASI METROPOLITAN ACHEAMPONG 05 October 2018 04 October 2021 MADAM PAULINA 3 ADAB SAB MATERNITY HOME MATERNITY HOME LONG TERM ASHANTI BOHYEN KUMASI METRO NTOW SAKYIBEA 04 April 2018 03 April 2021 DR. BEN BLAY OFOSU- 4 ADIEBEBA HOSPITAL LIMITED PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG-TERM ASHANTI ADIEBEBA KUMASI METROPOLITAN BARKO 07 August 2019 06 August 2022 5 ADOM MMROSO MATERNITY HOME HEALTH CENTRE LONG TERM ASHANTI BROFOYEDU-KENYASI KWABRE MR. FELIX ATANGA 23 August 2018 22 August 2021 DR. EMMANUEL 6 AFARI COMMUNITY HOSPITAL LIMITED PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG TERM ASHANTI AFARI ATWIMA NWABIAGYA MENSAH OSEI 04 January 2019 03 January 2022 AFRICAN DIASPORA CLINIC & MATERNITY MADAM PATRICIA 7 HOME HEALTH CENTRE LONG TERM ASHANTI ABIREM NEWTOWN KWABRE DISTRICT IJEOMA OGU 08 March 2019 07 March 2022 DR. JAMES K. BARNIE- 8 AGA HEALTH FOUNDATION PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG TERM ASHANTI OBUASI OBUASI MUNICIPAL ASENSO 30 July 2018 29 July 2021 DR. JOSEPH YAW 9 AGAPE MEDICAL CENTRE PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG TERM ASHANTI EJISU EJISU JUABEN MUNICIPAL MANU 15 March 2019 14 March 2022 10 AHMADIYYA MUSLIM MISSION -ASOKORE PRIMARY HOSPITAL LONG TERM ASHANTI ASOKORE KUMASI METROPOLITAN 30 July 2018 29 July 2021 AHMADIYYA MUSLIM MISSION HOSPITAL- DR.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 29055 GHANA COUNTRY PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT 2003 ANNEXES 1- 7 Vol. 3 June 2003 Ghana Country Department Africa Region List of Main Annexes ANNEX 1: PERSONS WHO WORKED ON THE CPAR ............................................... 2 ANNEX 2: LIST OF PERSONS MET .............................................................................. 3 ANNEX 3: LIST OF REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ....................................................... 5 ANNEX 4: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS TO THE CPAR NATIONAL WORKSHOP OF MARCH 17-21, 2003..................................................................................... 6 ANNEX 5: CPAR MISSION – AIDE MEMOIRE .......................................................... 9 ANNEX 5A: LIST OF MISSION MEMBERS ............................................................... 14 ANNEX 5B: COMMENTS ON THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT BILL...................... 15 ANNEX 5C OPENING ADDRESS BY DR. G.A. AGAMBILA, DEPUTY MINISTER OF FINANCE AT THE CPAR NATIONAL WORKSHOP, M-PLAZA HOTEL, ACCRA, MARCH 18, 2003 ......................................................... 22 ANNEX 6: SUMMARY ASSESSMENT FORMS.........................................................24 ANNEX 7 : CPPR 2002 ACTION PLAN ....................................................................... 43 ANNEX 10: CUSTOMS AND PORTS CLEARANCE PROCEDURES .......................46 ANNEX 11: LIST OF PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Profitability of On-Farm and Institutional Storage of Maize in the Ejura Sekyere-Dumase District of Ghana
    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROFITABILITY OF ON-FARM AND INSTITUTIONAL STORAGE OF MAIZE IN THE EJURA SEKYERE-DUMASE DISTRICT OF GHANA BY APENTENG PEPRAH THIS DISSERTATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON, IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE IN AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND AGRIBUSINESS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON DECEMBER, 2004 ( O 7 9 7 0 0 'X h f X W L t c c . ■ I DECLARATION I, Apenteng Peprah, author of this dissertation do hereby declare that the work presented in this dissertation “Comparative Analysis of the Profitability of On-farm and Institutional Storage of Maize in the Ejura Sekyere-Dumase District of Ghana” was done by me in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Ghana, Legon, from March 2004 to December 2004. This dissertation has never been presented either in whole or in part for any other degree of the University or elsewhere. Studies by other authors which serve as source of information have fully been acknowledged. (Student) Dr. (Mrs.) Ramatu M. Al-Hassan (Supervisor) DEDICATION To the Glory of the Almighty God, this dissertation is dedicated to my beloved wife, Mrs. Alexandra Aseidu Apenteng for her contributions in various ways for my education at this level. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work has assumed its present form through the direction and assistance by some well meaningful people. It is, therefore, fitting to express my heartfelt appreciation for their effort. I would like to acknowledge in particular my gratefulness to my dissertation supervisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mampong Municipal Assembly
    . REPUBLIC OF GHANA THE COMPOSITE BUDGET of the MAMPONG MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY for the 2016 FISCAL YEAR Mampong Municipal Assembly Page 1 For Copies of this MMDA’s Composite Budget, please contact the address below: The Coordinating Director, Mampong Municipal Assembly Ashanti Region This 2015 Composite Budget is also available on the internet at: www.mofep.gov.gh or www.ghanadistricts.com Mampong Municipal Assembly Page 2 Table of Content INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………...6 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 The Municipal Assembly .......................................................................................................................... 7 Area of Coverage ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Population ................................................................................................................................................. 7 The Municipal Economy ........................................................................................................................... 8 Culture ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Education .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Health .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralisation and Environmental Sustainability in Ghana: the Case of Obuasi Municipal Assembly in the Ashanti Region
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF GHANA DECENTRALISATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN GHANA: THE CASE OF OBUASI MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY IN THE ASHANTI REGION BY CHARLES OWUSU-ADUOMI BOTCHWEY (10395722) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MPHIL IN HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT DEGREE JUNE, 2015 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I do hereby declare that this study is the result of my own research and that no part of this work has been presented for another degree in the University of Ghana or elsewhere. All references have been duly acknowledged. I bear sole responsibility for any shortcomings. ………………………………. ………………………………. (CHARLES OWUSU-ADUOMI BOTCHWEY) DATE (10395722) i University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this Thesis was supervised in accordance with the procedures laid down by the university. ………………………………… …………………………. (DR. ALBERT AHENKAN) DATE (SUPERVISOR) ii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my caring and loving mother, Christiana Ama Afrane for sacrificing to drive me to school amid several pickles. Similarly, to my heart-felt daughter Nana Akosua Boahemaa Botchwey. iii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my deepest heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Albert Ahenkan for his guidance, expertise and immense contributions and support throughout this study. I wish to also express my deepest appreciation to my Head of Department, Dr. Justice N. Bawole for his sincerest support and encouragement. Also, I want to use this opportunity to express my thoughtful indebtedness to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Concentrations of Hazardous Metals in Medicinal Plants from Four Selected Districts in Ashanti Region of Ghana
    International Journal of Medicinal Plant Research Vol. 1 (3), pp. 012-019, August, 2012. Available online at www.internationalscholarsjournals.org © International Scholars Journals Full Length Research Paper Assessing concentrations of hazardous metals in medicinal plants from four selected districts in Ashanti region of Ghana Kofi Sarpong1, Emmanuel Dartey1 , Harrison Dapaah2 1Faculty of Science and Environment Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana. 2Faculty of Agriculture Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana. Received 21 July, 2012; Accepted 31 July, 2012 Hazardous metals such as lead, cadmium and arsenic are potential biaccumulative toxins of medicinal plants. The hazardous metal amounts of medicinal plants, however, remains poorly documented in Ghana. The study was carried out to assess the amounts of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As) in thirty-six (36) selected medicinal plant samples obtained from four (4) districts (Mampong, Sekyedumase, Ejisu and Oyoko) whose inhabitants are noted for extensive use of medicinal plants in the management of ailments. Dry Ashing method of digestion and analysis was adopted for the determination of amounts of hazardous metals and concentration per sample was expressed in µgg-1. The study revealed that all the samples contained the assessed hazardous metals except the bark of Ceiba pentandera (B) which had no As. Pb was also not detected in the fruit of Cola nitida while the rhizome of Zingiber officinale contained no Pb and Cd. The highest concentrations of Pb, Cd and As were detected in the bark of Mangifera indica (12.96 µgg-1) at Ejisu, the bark of Pycnanthus angolensis L (2.03 µgg-1 ) at Mampong and the leaves of Alchornea cordiforlia (16.35 µgg-1) at Sekyedumase, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Ghana
    GOVERNMENT OF GHANA MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT MEDIUM TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN UNDER THE GHANA SHARED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA II (GSGDA II), 2014-2017 PREPARED BY: SEKYERE CENTRAL DISTRICT ASSEMBLY DECEMBER, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENT CONTENT PAGE Table of content i List of Tables x List of Figures xiii Abbreviations & Acronyms xiv Executive Summary xviii CHAPTER ONE: PERFORMANCE REVIEW/ PROFILE/ CURRENT SITUATION 1.1.0 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Vision of the Assembly 1 1.1.2 Mission of the Assembly 1 1.1.3 Functions of the Sekyere Central District Assembly 1 1.2.0 Performance review of DMTDP (2010-2013) 3 1.2.1 Reasons for the non-achievement of all the plan Goals and Objectives 23 1.2.2 Problems/Constraints encountered during the plan implementation 23 1 2.3 Lessons Learnt 23 1.3.0 District Profile 24 1.3.1 Physical and Natural Environment 24 1.3.1.1 Location and Size 24 1.3.1.2 Climate 28 1.3.1.3 Vegetation 28 1.3.1.4 Conditions of the Natural Environment 28 1.3.1.5 Forest Reserve 29 1.3.1.6 Relief and Drainage 29 i 1.3.1.7 Soil and Agricultural Land Use 29 1.3.1.8 Impact on Human Activities 31 1.3.1.9 Geology and Minerals 31 1.3.1.10 Implication of the Physical and Natural Environment for Development 31 1.3.2.0 Culture 32 1.3.2.1 Traditional Set-up 32 1.3.2.2 Ethnic Diversity 32 1.3.2.3 Festival 33 1.3.2.4 Ethnic / Chieftaincy Conflict 33 1.3.2.5 Religious Composition 33 1.3.3.0 Settlement System 34 1.3.3.1 Introduction 34 1.3.3.2 Distribution of Service and Infrastructure 34 1.3.3.3 Functional Hierarchy of Settlement
    [Show full text]
  • The Speargrass (Imperata Cylindrica (L) Beauv.) Menace in Ghana
    The Speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L) Beauv.) Menace in Ghana: Incidence, Farmer Perceptions and Control Practices in the Forest and Forest-Savanna Transition Agro-ecological Zones of Ghana G. E.-K. Bolfrey-Arku1*, O. U. Onokpise2, A. G. Carson3, D. G. Shilling4 and C. C. Coultas2 1CSIR-Crops Research Institute, P. O. Box 3785, Kumasi, Ghana 2Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, Fl, USA 3School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana 4University of Georgia, Atlanta, USA *Corresponding author Abstract Surveys to determine farmers’ practices, perceptions and the incidence of speargrass were conducted in the forest and forest-savanna transition zones of Ghana in 1996 and 2000. Mean farm size was 1.2 ha, fallow and cropping length was 4.7 and 4.5 years, respectively, with a mean cropping intensity factor (CIF) of 49%. Speargrass had been present in the area for over 40 years and was perceived as the most noxious weed. Eighty- six percent of fields that relied on slash-burn method of land preparation had severe speargrass infestation. Infestations > 50% cover, mean density of 33 plants m-2 and shoot height range of 15–300 cm were observed on 60% of the fields. Fifty-one percent of farmers reported of inadequate level of control with current control practices. Glyphosate was applied on fields with > 50% speargrass cover. Speargrass becomes a problem after 3 years continuous cropping from fallow and, under severe infestation, most farmers abandon fields to natural fallow. A dense regrowth of Chromolaena odorata is indicative of a speargrass-suppressed field. Follow-up weed control could be 3-6 times/season depending on initial land preparation, type of crop and/or level of infestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Document of the International Fund for Agricultural Development for Official Use Only
    Document of The International Fund for Agricultural Development For Official Use Only REPUBLIC OF GHANA RURAL ENTERPRISES PROJECT (SRS-38-GH) INTERIM EVALUATION Volume I: Main Report & Appendices Report No. 1097 December 2000 Office of Evaluation and Studies RURAL ENTERPRISES PROJECT INTERIM EVALUATION AGREEMENT AT COMPLETION POINT* * The Agreement at Completion Point was prepared in conformity with members of the Core Learning Partnership, viz: Chief Director, Mr. E.P.D. Barnes, Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology; Mr. K Attah-Antwi, Project Coordinator, Rural Enterprises Project; Deputy Director, Mr. K. Okyere , National Development Planning Commission; Mr. M. Manssouri (replacing Mr P. Saint Ange), Country Portfolio Manager, IFAD; Mr. F. Sarassoro, SPMO, UNOPS; and Ms. C. Palmeri, Senior Evaluation Officer, IFAD. In preparation for a possible second phase of the Rural Enterprises Project requested by the Government of Ghana (GOG), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) undertook an Interim Evaluation (IE) of the Project in June - July 2000 using the new IFAD approach to evaluation. A Core Learning Partnership of stakeholders set the objectives and key questions for the IE. The members of the Core Learning Partnership, having reviewed the results of the IE, have come to agreement on the following findings, recommendations and follow-up actions. GENERAL FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND AGREED FOLLOW-UP 1. Small-scale enterprise development reduces poverty. New and existing businesses assisted by the Project have contributed to increased economic activity, increased employment and poverty reduction in rural areas. The performance and impact of the Project’s technology and business skills training and counselling programmes to create new businesses and employment demonstrate that they can be used as a model for reducing rural poverty in Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite Budget for 2018-2021 Programme Based
    Table of Contents PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 3 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................................... 3 2. POPULATION STRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 3 3. GOVERNANCE .......................................................................................................................... 5 REPUBLIC OF GHANA 4. DISTRICT ECONOMY ............................................................................................................. 5 4.1. AGRICULTURE ................................................................................................................. 5 COMPOSITE BUDGET 4.2. FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ............................................................................................. 7 4.3. MARKET CENTRE............................................................................................................ 7 4.4. ROAD NETWORK ............................................................................................................. 7 FOR 2018-2021 4.5. EDUCATION ....................................................................................................................... 7 4.6. HEALTH .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.7. WATER AND SANITATION ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Intensity of Chemical Control of Capsid Among Cocoa
    MODELLING COCOA FARMER BEHAVIOUR CONCERNING THE CHEMICAL CONTROL OF CAPSID IN THE SEKYERE AREA ASHANTI REGION, GHANA by Eric Asare A Thesis submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY, AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS Faculty of Agriculture College of agribusiness and Natural Resources June, 2011 DECLARATION AND APPROVAL I, Eric Asare, hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the M.Phil degree and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material previously published by another person nor material which has been accepted for the award of any degree of the University, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. …………………………………. DATE……………………. ERIC ASARE (STUDENT) CERTIFIED BY: …………………………………… DATE…………………… DR. K. OHENE-YANKYERA (SUPERVISOR) ………………………………………. DATE…………………….. DR. S.C. FIALOR (HEAD OF DEPARTMENT) ii DEDICATION This study is dedicated to the Lord Almighty, from him my help comes from. Secondly, it is dedicated to George Essel, Dorcas Donkor and my entire family. Eric Asare June, 2011 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I thank God for His guidance, grace and steadfast love and for making this Thesis a success. To Dr. Ohene-Yankyera, I say thank you for your patience, fatherly attitude, guidance, and useful and constructive criticisms in making this theses a success. May the good Lord reward you exceedingly abundantly and bless you with more wisdom and mercy so that you can continue to do the good things you have been doing. I am also indebted greatly to the Ghana Sustainable and Cocoa Competitive Systems (SCCS) Project, for their material support.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashanti Region Report 2005.Pdf
    INTRODUCTION 1.0 REGIONAL BACKGROUND Ashanti Region has a land size of 24,390sq km, which is about 10.2% of the land area of Ghana. The region in its nodal structure share common boundaries, to the north with Brong Ahafo; to the south with Central Region, to the east with Eastern Region and to the west with Western Region. It lies approximately between longitude 0.15’ to 2.25’ west and latitude 5.50’ to 7.40’ north. Ashanti is the most heavily populated region in Ghana, with a population of 4, 270, 302 for 2005 (Projection from the 2000 Housing and Population Census, Ghana Statistical Service). About 47% of the population are in the rural areas. The region has a large proportion of hard to reach areas especially in the Afram Plains sections of Sekyere East, Ejura Sekyedumase, Sekyere West and Asante Akim North districts. Three new districts namely Adansi North, Atwima Mponua and Amansie Central were created. This has raised the number of districts to twenty-one (21) districts with 114 sub-districts. There are five hundred and twenty five (525) health facilities in the region. The Ghana Health Service operates about 40% of all health facilities in the region. Kumasi has the highest number of facilities (42%) with Amansie Central district having the least (Source: Service Availability Mapping Survey). 1.1 Focus of the region at the beginning of the year The focus of the region at the beginning of the year was on the following: i. Human Resource Issues The need to improve staff capacity and retention in the region by sponsoring nurses and doctors and other health staff for training.
    [Show full text]