Dual Antigen-Restricted Complementation of a Two-Part Trispecific Antibody for Targeted Immunotherapy of Blood Cancer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dual Antigen-Restricted Complementation of a Two-Part Trispecific Antibody for Targeted Immunotherapy of Blood Cancer Dual Antigen-Restricted Complementation of a Two-Part Trispecific Antibody for Targeted Immunotherapy of Blood Cancer Von zwei Antigenen abhängige Komplementierung eines zweiteiligen trispezifischen Antikörpers zur gezielten Immuntherapie von Blutkrebs Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Agnes Banaszek aus Gdynia (dt. Gdingen), Polen Würzburg 2013 Declaration Declaration I hereby assure that I have carried out the presented study independently and without using any other sources or help, except where stated. Furthermore, I confirm that this thesis has not yet been submitted as part of another examination process neither in identical nor in similar form. I further declare that I have not acquired or tried to acquire any other academic degrees, except my diploma degree. Würzburg, 20 September 2013 ......................................................................... Agnes Banaszek Eingereicht am: …………………………………………………………… Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: …………………………………………………………… Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Harald Wajant (Med. Fakultät) Gutachter: Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Dandekar (Biol. Fakultät) Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: ………………………………………….. Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: ………………………………………….. Agnes Banaszek ii Acknowledgements Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Harald Wajant, who gave me the opportunity to carry out the major part of this study within his group and laboratory. Thank you for your willingness to be my supervisor, for your valuable advice and encouraging support, for always having an open door for me, for the helpful discussions and suggestions, and, finally, for proofreading. Of course, this study wouldn’t have been possible without Dr. med. Gernot Stuhler, who had the brilliant idea for this project. Thank you for guiding this project through all its ups and downs, for granting me the opportunity to work on such an innovative and challenging research issue, for giving me the freedom I needed to make my own decisions, and, finally, for providing the necessary funding. I would also like to thank Prof. Dr. Thomas Dandekar, who agreed to supervise me during this study as a second assessor. Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Gattenlöhner deserves thanks for providing the scFv against fAChR and for the good collaboration on the rhabdomyosarcoma concerning part of this study. Furthermore, I wish to thank Dr. Kurt Bommert and his group for providing me with a workplace at his laboratory for the first one and a half years of my doctoral studies, for their support and the nice working atmosphere. I am also grateful to Dr. med. Dirk Hönemann, who supervised me at the very beginning of this project, before leaving for the other side of the world. Special thanks go to Daniela Weisenberger for cloning a few fusion proteins (CD3- Gaussia Luciferase) and for the preparation and monitoring of some of the bacterial cultures for antibody expression. In addition, I am indebted to Jacqueline Maar and Hannes Schloßnagel for helping me a few times with the bacterial production and purification of the 18 antibody constructs. Furthermore, I am grateful to Nadine Vornberger for performing the cytotoxicity assays presented in this study. They all worked very diligently. Moreover, I would like to thank the members of MIM ( Molekulare Innere Medizin ) for their support, advice, the pleasant working atmosphere in the laboratory, and their friendly welcome. Special thanks go to my parents for their support throughout my entire studies and my sister Paulina, an English expert, for proofreading. I would particularly like to thank Martin for all his love, his patient and tireless support throughout my studies and work on this thesis, and for thorough proofreading. Finally, thank you to everyone else who supported me during the last one and a half years as best they could. Agnes Banaszek iii Table of Contents Table of Contents Declaration.................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................iii Table of Contents .......................................................................................................iv 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................... 1 Kurzbeschreibung ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Cancer Prevalence and Motivation for the Project ...................................................... 5 2.2 Targets in Tumour Therapy ......................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Fetal Acetylcholine Receptor and Rhabdomyosarcoma ........................................ 6 2.2.2 HLA-A2 and the Function of MHC Molecules ........................................................ 8 2.2.3 CD45 – Leucocyte-Common Antigen .................................................................. 11 2.3 Therapeutic Antibodies in Cancer Therapy ............................................................... 13 2.3.1 The Concept of Bispecific Antibodies .................................................................. 14 2.3.2 Recombinant Bispecific Antibody Formats .......................................................... 14 2.4 Bispecific Antibodies for Targeting Immune Effector Cells ........................................ 17 2.4.1 Activation of Naive T Cells ................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Primary Signal for T-Cell Activation ..................................................................... 19 2.4.3 Bispecific Antibodies for the Retargeting of T Cells ............................................. 20 2.5 Dual Targeting with Bispecific Antibodies .................................................................. 23 2.6 Thesis Aims and the Concept of a Dual Antigen-Restricted Trispecific Antibody ..... 24 3 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................27 3.1 Materials .................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.1 Instruments........................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2 Special Implements .............................................................................................. 28 3.1.3 Chemicals, Solutions, and Media ......................................................................... 28 3.1.4 Antibodies and their Working Dilution .................................................................. 30 3.1.5 Antigens, Enzymes, Kits, and Markers ................................................................ 31 3.1.6 Oligonucleotides ................................................................................................... 32 3.1.7 Vectors ................................................................................................................. 34 3.1.8 E. coli Strains ....................................................................................................... 36 3.1.9 Mammalian Cell Lines .......................................................................................... 37 3.2 Strategies for Cloning of Recombinant Antibody Constructs..................................... 38 3.2.1 Construction of Recombinant Bispecific AChR γ × CD3 taFvs ............................. 38 3.2.2 Construction of a Two-Part Trispecific HLA-A2 × CD3 × CD45 Antibody ........... 39 3.2.3 Construction of Bispecific HLA-A2 × CD3 taFvs .................................................. 41 3.3 Cloning of Recombinant Antibody Constructs ........................................................... 41 3.3.1 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) ..................................................................... 41 3.3.2 Restriction Digestion ............................................................................................ 42 3.3.3 Agarose Gel Electrophoresis and DNA Gel Extraction ........................................ 42 3.3.4 Ligation ................................................................................................................. 43 3.3.5 Preparation of Chemically Competent Cells ........................................................ 43 3.3.6 Transformation of Chemically Competent Cells................................................... 43 3.3.7 Screening of Positive Transformants by PCR ...................................................... 44 3.3.8 Plasmid DNA Isolation (Mini and Midi Preparation) ............................................. 44 3.3.9 Sequence Analysis ............................................................................................... 45 Agnes Banaszek iv Table of Contents 3.4 Expression and Purification of Recombinant Antibodies ........................................... 45 3.4.1 Periplasmic Protein Expression ........................................................................... 45 3.4.2 Immobilised-Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) ............................................ 45 3.4.3 Determination of Protein Concentration ..............................................................
Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,877,688 B2 Vasquez Et Al
    US008877688B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,877,688 B2 Vasquez et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 4, 2014 (54) RATIONALLY DESIGNED, SYNTHETIC (56) References Cited ANTIBODY LIBRARIES AND USES THEREFOR U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4.946,778 A 8, 1990 Ladner et al. (75) Inventors: Maximiliano Vasquez, Palo Alto, CA 5,118,605 A 6/1992 Urdea (US); Michael Feldhaus, Grantham, NH 5,223,409 A 6/1993 Ladner et al. 5,283,173 A 2f1994 Fields et al. (US); Tillman U. Gerngross, Hanover, 5,380,833. A 1, 1995 Urdea NH (US); K. Dane Wittrup, Chestnut 5,525.490 A 6/1996 Erickson et al. Hill, MA (US) 5,530,101 A 6/1996 Queen et al. 5,565,332 A 10/1996 Hoogenboom et al. (73) Assignee: Adimab, LLC, Lebanon, NH (US) 5,571,698 A 11/1996 Ladner et al. 5,618,920 A 4/1997 Robinson et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,658,727 A 8, 1997 Barbas et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 (Continued) U.S.C. 154(b) by 747 days. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS This patent is Subject to a terminal dis claimer. DE 19624562 A1 1, 1998 WO WO-88.01649 A1 3, 1988 (21) Appl. No.: 12/404,059 (Continued) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (22) Filed: Mar 13, 2009 Rader et al. (Jul. 21, 1998) Proceedings of the National Academy of (65) Prior Publication Data Sciences USA vol. 95 pp. 8910 to 8915.* US 201O/OO5638.6 A1 Mar. 4, 2010 (Continued) Primary Examiner — Heather Calamita Related U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phage Display Libraries for Antibody Therapeutic Discovery and Development
    antibodies Review Phage Display Libraries for Antibody Therapeutic Discovery and Development Juan C. Almagro 1,2,* , Martha Pedraza-Escalona 3, Hugo Iván Arrieta 3 and Sonia Mayra Pérez-Tapia 3 1 GlobalBio, Inc., 320, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 UDIBI, ENCB, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico 11340, Mexico 3 CONACyT-UDIBI, ENCB, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomas, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico 11340, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 June 2019; Accepted: 15 August 2019; Published: 23 August 2019 Abstract: Phage display technology has played a key role in the remarkable progress of discovering and optimizing antibodies for diverse applications, particularly antibody-based drugs. This technology was initially developed by George Smith in the mid-1980s and applied by John McCafferty and Gregory Winter to antibody engineering at the beginning of 1990s. Here, we compare nine phage display antibody libraries published in the last decade, which represent the state of the art in the discovery and development of therapeutic antibodies using phage display. We first discuss the quality of the libraries and the diverse types of antibody repertoires used as substrates to build the libraries, i.e., naïve, synthetic, and semisynthetic. Second, we review the performance of the libraries in terms of the number of positive clones per panning, hit rate, affinity, and developability of the selected antibodies. Finally, we highlight current opportunities and challenges pertaining to phage display platforms and related display technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generation of Synthetic Antibody Reagents for Clostridium Difficile Toxins
    The Generation of Synthetic Antibody Reagents for Clostridium difficile Toxins by Sylvia Cien Man Wong A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto © Copyright by Sylvia Wong 2013 The Generation of Synthetic Antibody Reagents for Clostridium difficile Toxins Sylvia Cien Man Wong Master of Science Graduate Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto 2013 Abstract The symptoms of C. difficile infection are primarily caused by two toxins, toxin A and toxin B. Some strains produce a third known toxin, C. difficile transferase (CDT) toxin; however, its role in virulence remains unclear. I aimed to develop synthetic antibodies using phage display technology to block toxin entry by binding to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the toxins. I first described the generation of anti-toxin A and anti-toxin B Fabs. I presented Fab A3, which bound to the full-length toxin, but did not functionally inhibit toxin entry. In chapter 2, I described the generation of novel anti-CDTb antibodies. I further demonstrated that five of the anti-CDTb antibodies could functionally inhibit CDTb binding in an ELISA-based assay and on cultured cells. These antibodies can be used as tools to understand the toxins’ role in human disease and potentially be used as therapeutics. ii Acknowledgments I am very thankful for having the chance to work with many great scientists in Dr. Jason Moffat’s and Dr. Sachdev Sidhu’s labs. These people made the lab a very motivating, supportive, and intellectually stimulating environment, where I was able to learn and expand my critical thinking skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2008/048970 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date (10) International Publication Number 24 April 2008 (24.04.2008) PCT WO 2008/048970 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (72) Inventors; and A61K 39/395 (2006 01) (75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): JOHNSTON, Stephen, Albert [US/US], 8606 S Dorsey Lane, Tempe, (21) International Application Number: AZ 85284 (US) WOODBURY, Neal [US/US], 1001 S PCT/US2007/081536 McAllister Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287 (US) CHAPUT, John, C. [US/US], 3069 E Dry Creed Road, Phoenix, AZ (22) International Filing Date: 16 October 2007 (16 10 2007) 85048 (US) DIEHNELT, Chris, W. [US/US], 20941 N Leona Boulevard, Maπ copa, AZ 85239 (US) YAN, Hao (25) Filing Language: English [CN/US], 1300 N Brentwood Place, Chandler, AZ 85224 (26) Publication Language: English (US) (74) Agent: LIEBESCHUETZ, Joe, Townsend and Townsend (30) Priority Data: and Crew LLP , 8th floor, Two Embarcadero Center, San 60/852,040 16 October 2006 (16 10 2006) US Francisco, CA 941 11-3834 (US) 60/975,442 26 September 2007 (26 09 2007) US (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): THE kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, A BODY COR¬ AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, PORATE OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA acting for CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, and on behalf
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Design of Peptide Ligands Based on Antibody-Antigen Interface Properties
    Computational design of peptide ligands based on antibody-antigen interface properties By Benjamin Thomas VIART Thesis Advisor Prof. Dra. Liza Figueiredo Felicori Vilela Thesis Co-advisor Dr. Franck Molina Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioinformática Avenida Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 Pampulha 31270-901 Belo Horizonte - MG To my parents, ii Acknowledgments • Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Prof. Liza Figueiredo Felicori Vilela for the continuous support of my Ph.D study, for her patience, motivation and knowledge. Her advices and guidance helped me better understand the scientific gait, the rules of research, the importance of the details. I would like to thank her as well for making feel welcome in Brazil, helping me with the transition to this new culture that is now part of me as the French culture is part of her. • Secondly, I would like to deeply thank my co-advisor Dr Franck Molina, without whom I would never have done this PhD. I am forever grateful to him for believing in me and helping me achieve this goal. • From the department, I would like to thanks Prof. Jader, Prof. Vasco, Prof. Miguel, Prof. Lucas, Prof. Gloria as well as Sheila. • This thesis is dedicated to my parents, Frédéric and Françoise Viart, who helped me throughout my life to become a good person. I thank them for their unconditional love and support. • I would like to thank all my family, especially my sisters, Sophie and Lisa, for their smiles and grimaces; my grand-parents, Bob, Nanou and Mémé for their support and love and also my uncle, Bruno, for all his help when I was in first year of medical school.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanobodies and Recombinant Binders in Cell Biology
    JCB: Review Nanobodies and recombinant binders in cell biology Jonas Helma,1 M. Cristina Cardoso,2 Serge Muyldermans,3 and Heinrich Leonhardt1 1Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany 2Department of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany 3Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Antibodies are key reagents to investigate cellular pro- exclusive to small and stable binding molecules and cannot cesses. The development of recombinant antibodies and be performed easily with full-length antibodies, as a result of crucial inter- and intramolecular disulphide bridges that do not binders derived from natural protein scaffolds has ex- form in the cytoplasm. Thus, researchers have found a plethora panded traditional applications, such as immunofluores- of new applications in which binders have been combined with cence, binding arrays, and immunoprecipitation. In enzymatic or structural functionalities in living systems. addition, their small size and high stability in ectopic en- The development of in vitro screening techniques has been a decisive step for the rise and generation of recombinant vironments have enabled their use in all areas of cell re- binding reagents. These methods include classic phage display Downloaded from search, including structural biology, advanced microscopy, but also bacterial and yeast display as well as ribosomal and and intracellular expression. Understanding these novel mRNA display. With such in vitro display techniques at hand, directed evolution strategies and genetic manipulation of binder reagents as genetic modules that can be integrated into sequences allow targeted engineering of key features, such as cellular pathways opens up a broad experimental spec- specificity, valence, affinity, and stability, enable derivatization trum to monitor and manipulate cellular processes.
    [Show full text]
  • EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies
    EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies EUR 30185 EN Joint Research Centre This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. EURL ECVAM Recommendations The aim of a EURL ECVAM Recommendation is to provide the views of the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) on the scientific validity of alternative test methods, to advise on possible applications and implications, and to suggest follow-up activities to promote alternative methods and address knowledge gaps. During the development of its Recommendation, EURL ECVAM typically mandates the EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) to carry out an independent scientific peer review which is communicated as an ESAC Opinion and Working Group report. In addition, EURL ECVAM consults with other Commission services, EURL ECVAM’s advisory body for Preliminary Assessment of Regulatory Relevance (PARERE), the EURL ECVAM Stakeholder Forum (ESTAF) and with partner organisations of the International Collaboration on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). Contact information European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Chemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit (F3) Address: via E.
    [Show full text]
  • Monobodies and Other Synthetic Binding Proteins for Expanding Protein Science
    Reviews Protein Science DOI 10.1002/pro.3148 Monobodies and Other Synthetic Binding Proteins for Expanding Protein Science Fern Sha,1,4 Gabriel Salzman,1 Ankit Gupta1,2 and Shohei Koide1,2,3* 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 2Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA 4Present address, Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20148, USA *Correspondence to: Shohei Koide, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Synthetic binding proteins are constructed using non-antibody molecular scaffolds. Over the last two decades, in-depth structural and functional analyses of synthetic binding proteins have improved combinatorial library designs and selection strategies, which have resulted in potent platforms that consistently generate binding proteins to diverse targets with affinity and specificity that rival those of antibodies. Favorable attributes of synthetic binding proteins, such as small size, freedom from disulfide bond formation and ease of making fusion proteins, have enabled their unique applications in protein science, cell biology and beyond. Here, we review recent studies that illustrate how synthetic binding proteins are powerful probes that can directly link structure and function,
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Tortoitu Muutuu Tononi Mitin
    THETWO TORTOITUUS MUUTUU20180022800A1 TONONI MITIN ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication (10 ) Pub. No. : US 2018/ 0022800 A1 West et al. (43 ) Pub . Date : Jan . 25 , 2018 (54 ) BIOMARKER Publication Classification ( 51) Int. Ci. ( 71) Applicant: ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED , CO7K 16 /24 ( 2006 . 01 ) Oxford (GB ) A61K 31 / 56 ( 2006 .01 ) A61K 38 / 17 ( 2006 .01 ) GOIN 33868 (2006 . 01 ) (72 ) Inventors : Nathaniel Richard West, Oxford (GB ) ; A61K 38 /20 ( 2006 .01 ) Benjamin Michael Joseph Owens, (52 ) U . S . CI. Oxford (GB ) ; Ahmed Nabil Hegazy , CPC . .. CO7K 16 / 248 ( 2013 .01 ) ; GOIN 33 /6869 Oxford (GB ) ; Fiona Margaret Powrie , ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 38 / 204 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; A61K Oxford (GB ) 38 / 1793 ( 2013 .01 ) ; CO7K 16 / 241 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31 /56 ( 2013 .01 ) ; GOIN 2800 / 52 (2013 .01 ) ; GOIN 2800 /065 (2013 .01 ) ; COZK ( 21) Appl . No. : 15 /547 , 154 2317 / 76 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; GOIN 2333 / 5412 ( 2013. 01 ) ; CO7K 2317 / 24 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K ( 22 ) PCT Filed : Jan . 28 , 2016 2039 / 505 ( 2013 .01 ) ( 86 ) PCT No .: PCT /GB2016 /050185 (57 ) ABSTRACT The invention relates to methods of treating chronic intes $ 371 (c ) ( 1 ) , tinal inflammation and /or inflammatory bowel disease by ( 2 ) Date : Jul . 28 , 2017 administering an antagonist of oncostatin - M (OSM ) and / or OSM receptor - B (OSMR ) . The invention also relates to ( 30 ) Foreign Application Priority Data methods for diagnosing or prognosing chronic intestinal inflammation and /or inflammatory bowel disease in an indi Jan . 29 , 2015 (GB ) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1501480 .6 vidual and for predicting whether or not an individual will Jan . 29 , 2015 (GB )) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1501511 . 8 respond to an anti - TNFa therapy .
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Delivery of Polymer Prodrug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy
    Investigator: Prashant Raj Bhattarai Targeted Delivery of Polymer Prodrug conjugates for Cancer therapy Doctoral Thesis Dissertation Presented by Prashant Raj Bhattarai To The Bouvé Graduate School of Health Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmaceutical Science NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS August 2018 i Investigator: Prashant Raj Bhattarai Northeastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences Dissertation Approval Dissertation title: Targeted Delivery of Polymer Prodrug conjugates for Cancer therapy Author: Prashant Raj Bhattarai Program: PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences Approval for dissertation requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in: Pharmaceutical Science Dissertation Committee (Chairman): Dr. Ban-An Khaw Date: 8/07/2018 Other committee members: Dr. Vladimir Torchilin Date: 8/07/2018 Dr. Jonghan Kim Date: 8/07/2018 Dr. Eugene Bernstein Date: 8/07/2018 Dr. Joel Berniac Date: 8/07/2018 Dean of the Bouvé College Graduate School of Health Sciences: Date: ii Investigator: Prashant Raj Bhattarai TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS v LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF ACRONYMNS x 1) INTRODUCTION 1.1 Antibody targeted therapies 1 1.2 Bispecific Antibodies and Pretargeting Approach 1 1.3 Rationale for using Antibody fragments 3 1.4 Rationale for using Affibody: 5 1.5 Rationale for using biotin as a second cancer-targeting agent 6 1.6 Polymer prodrug conjugates for Cancer Therapy 7 1.7 Multidrug Resistance in tumor 8 1.8 Combination therapy 9 1.9 Spheroid Cell Culture 10 2) SPECIFIC AIMS 12 3) MATERIALS AND METHODS 14 3.1 Purification and Characterization of anti-HER2/neu Affibodies 3.2 Preparation and Characterization of anti-HER2/neu X anti-DTPA Fab bispecific 18 complex 3.3 Preparation and characterization of biotinylated anti-DTPA bispecific antibody 21 complex 23 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Ubiquitin Recognition and Generating Affinity Reagents
    Ubiquitin Engineering: Understanding Ubiquitin Recognition and Generating Affinity Reagents by Isabel Leung A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto © Copyright by Isabel Leung 2017 Abstract Ubiquitin Engineering: Understanding Ubiquitin Recognition and Generating Affinity Reagents Isabel Leung Doctor of Philosophy Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto 2016 Protein-protein interactions are necessary for virtually all biological processes. There have been tremendous efforts to document the diversity of molecular recognition, and to understand how molecular recognition occurs. The understanding of molecular interaction has also served as the foundation for designing novel protein interactions for use in therapeutics, diagnostics and basic sciences. An attractive system for studying protein-protein interactions is the ubiquitin (Ub) system. Ub is a protein modifier that is combinatorially ligated onto substrate proteins to influence substrate turnover and function. Ub uses a common surface to interact with more than 1000 proteins and plays pivotal roles in cell physiology. Despite the substantial structural information on Ub mediated interactions, there is no clear understanding of how individual Ub residues contribute to Ub’s broad scope of interactions. To address this question, I used affinity enhanced Ub variants (Ubvs) as proxies of native Ub in saturation scanning. Using saturation scanning, I studied the interactions between Ubvs and two Ub specific proteases (USP), USP2 and USP21, and elucidated a common functional epitope that is critical for USP recognition. The functional epitope recognizes USP residues that are conserved among the human USP family, suggesting it may make functional contributions in many other USP interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Avidin As an Alternative Scaffold Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2305
    SOILI LEHTONEN Avidin as an Alternative Scaffold Alternative Scaffold as an Avidin SOILI LEHTONEN Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2305 SOILI LEHTONEN Avidin as an Alternative Scaffold Development of avidin-based small molecule binding proteins, antidins AUT 2305 AUT SOILI LEHTONEN Avidin as an Alternative Scaffold Development of avidin-based small molecule binding proteins, antidins ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty Council of the Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences of the University of Tampere, for public discussion in the auditorium F115 of the Arvo building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, Tampere, on 15 September 2017, at 12 o’clock. UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE SOILI LEHTONEN Avidin as an Alternative Scaffold Development of avidin-based small molecule binding proteins, antidins Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2305 Tampere University Press Tampere 2017 ACADEMIC DISSERTATION University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences National Doctoral Programme in Informational and Structural Biology (ISB) Doctoral Programme in Biomedicine and Biotechnology Finland Supervised by Reviewed by Professor Emeritus Markku Kulomaa Docent Urpo Lamminmäki University of Tampere Tampere University of Technology Finland Finland Associate Professor Vesa Hytönen Professor Stefan Ståhl University of Tampere KTH Biotechnology Royal Institute of Technology Finland Sweden The originality of this thesis has been checked using the Turnitin OriginalityCheck service in accordance with the quality management system of the University of Tampere. Copyright ©2017 Tampere University Press and the author Cover design by Mikko Reinikka Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2305 Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 1809 ISBN 978-952-03-0513-0 (print) ISBN 978-952-03-0514-7 (pdf) ISSN-L 1455-1616 ISSN 1456-954X ISSN 1455-1616 http://tampub.uta.fi Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy – Juvenes Print Tampere 2017 441 729 Painotuote This PhD thesis is dedicated to our dear children: Juho, you are the sunshine of my life.
    [Show full text]