DOCSLIB.ORG

Transferable Development Rights in Southeast Lee County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transferable Development Rights in Southeast Lee County Transferable Development Rights In Southeast Lee County Planning for the Density Reduction / Groundwater Resource Area (DR/GR) Lee County, Florida Submitted July 2009 General Preface 1.3 Introduction 1.4 P REFACE 1 TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS IN SOUTHEAST LEE COUNTY GENERAL PREFACE In 1990, Lee County Commissioners applied a new In September 2008 the Board of County Commission- Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource (DR/GR) ers directed that implementation of this plan begin im- designation to most of southeast Lee County to pro- mediately. This implementation phase will produce five tect the area’s shallow aquifers and reduce the county’s separate reports: population capacity. The 82,560 acres of the southeast DR/GR host rural neighborhoods, limerock mines, and • Proposed Lee Plan Amendments for Southeast Lee active farms. The land also contains valuable ecological County, which contains detailed amendments to and hydrological features including panther habitat and maps and policies in the Lee Plan and a summa- public water supply wells. ry of the data and analysis upon which they are based. Since the designation of the area, the pressure to mine and to expand the urban area outward has been increas- • Transferable Development Rights in Southeast Lee ing. In the fall of 2007 the Board of County Commis- County, which analyzes the feasibility of a trans- sioners initiated a 14-point Action Plan addressing criti- ferable development rights program and provides cal mining, traffic, and land use issues in the DR/GR detailed designs for potential rural and mixed-use area. communities. A major planning effort was part of this initiative. Using • Comprehensive Hydrological Study of the Lee detailed ecological mapping and a scenario-based land County Southeastern Density Reduction/Ground- use study, a new Prospects for Southeast Lee County plan water Resource Area, which documents the cre- defined proper balances of uses for the DR/GR’s future. ation of an integrated surface and groundwater model and analyzes land-use alternatives for this Dover, Kohl & Partners led the project team, with col- area from a hydrological perspective. laboration from Spikowski Planning Associates, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., Hall Planning & En- • Natural Resource Strategies for Southeast Lee gineering, Dan Cary, Berger Singerman, David Douglas County, which addresses best farming practices, Associates, Inc., and DHI Water & Environment, Inc. land acquisition and restoration, mine reclamation standards, and innovative mining approaches. To provide oversight and additional insight into emerg- ing policy options, the Lee County Commission ap- • Proposed Land Development Code Amendments pointed a 15-member DR/GR Advisory Committee for Southeast Lee County, which contains de- that met throughout 2008 and formulated independent tailed code amendments to carry out the Lee Plan recommendations on future county policy for southeast amendments and other recommendations of these Lee County. reports. This current document analyzes the feasibility of a transferable development rights (TDR) program, pro- vides detailed designs for potential rural and mixed-use communities, and proposes a new TDR program for southeast Lee County. 1.2 PREFACE INTRODUCTION Future residential development in the DR/GR area was This report explores the creation of a new TDR program carefully considered in Prospects for Southeast Lee County. for Lee County’s DR/GR area. This program would be a Two of the eleven planning principles presented in that supplement to the current TDR program which applies report addressed residential development: only to wetlands and which does not allow those devel- opment rights to be used anywhere within the DR/GR. Reallocate Development Rights; Create Sustainable Settlements To create a TDR program, Lee County would need to • DR/GR land is too valuable to waste on inefficient amend the Lee Plan to enable the program and then land use patterns. amend the Land Development Code to provide all • Keep new residential development away from pre- the details needed to carry it out. Specific Lee Plan ferred mining areas to prevent conflicts. amendments have already been proposed in a companion • Compact and connected mixed-use communities report, Proposed Lee Plan Amendments for Southeast Lee should be the standard in the DR/GR. County. Live Lightly on the Land This report is organized into three additional chapters. • Adverse human impacts on DR/GR lands should Chapter 2, prepared by economist James C. Nicholas, be minimized. Ph. D.1 explores the history of TDR programs around • Encourage cluster development to reduce the cu- the country and the economic conditions under which mulative impact of human settlement. they can function effectively. An analysis is then pre- sented of vacant land sales in and near southeast Lee Under current regulations, future residential develop- County over five recent years to project the value of in- ment in the DR/GR area is limited to 1 dwelling unit creased development intensity (and thus the economic per 10 acres. This low density cap could result in an feasibility of a TDR program). Keys to successful TDR unnecessary loss of agriculture if owners of large tracts programs are then presented. choose to create a profusion of 10-acre lots. Large-lot development can fragment natural habitats and require Chapter 3 identifies the best locations in the DR/GR for excessive travel for residents who regularly drive to jobs, development rights to be concentrated and sets forth shopping, and entertainment. basic design principles for traditional walkable neigh- borhoods. These principles are applied to each location Opportunities exist for development rights within the to demonstrate ideal ways for this concentration of de- DR/GR to be used without creating additional large-lot velopment rights to take place. subdivisions. Chapter 4 proposes a new TDR program that accom- On large tracts of land, allowable development rights plishes the principles and recommendations from Pros- can be shifted and concentrated fairly easily; the same pects for Southeast Lee County. This program would be car- number of units can be constructed in compact form on ried out through amendments to the Lee Plan and the a fraction of the acreage. When parcels are smaller or Land Development Code. non-contiguous tracts are involved, this shifting requires a transferable development rights (TDR) program. Such a program could create mixed-use communities that also provide commercial and employment opportunities to help balance Lehigh Acres’ abundance of single-family lots and severe shortage of land for all other purposes. 1 Emeritus Professor of Urban & Regional Planning and Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Florida 1.3 TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS IN SOUTHEAST LEE COUNTY 1.4 Introduction 2.3 Transferable Development Rights 2.7 Empirical Results 2.12 Keys to a Successful TDR Program 2.25 HISTORY & ECONOMICS OF TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 2 This chapter prepared by: James C. Nicholas, Ph. D. HISTORY & ECONOMICS OF TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS INTRODUCTION THE ISSUE The conversion of lands from one use to another has would place “inordinate burdens” on private property been a matter of concern in many areas around the may require monetary compensation or other com- country. The economic pressures for converting from pensatory actions by local government even if they are one, less intensive use such as agriculture, to another, not unconstitutional takings. Local governments are more intensive use, such as suburban or urban develop- caught between a duty to protect public health, safety, ment, are well known.1 Land in Lee County commonly and welfare and the potential to be ordered to compen- tends to be more valuable in development than in farm- sate landowners whose property has been taken or inor- ing or laying fallow, thus converting from low value to dinately burdened even by regulations that are justified higher value uses tends to be rewarded with profit. for the protection to public health, safety, or welfare.5 Regulatory measures, such as land use plans and zoning, There has been a great deal of experimentation around can retard and even stop such conversions. However, the country with land management techniques that such regulatory measures have their own problems. The permanently retain lands in existing low intensity uses. most obvious consequence of conversion ending regula- In some cases these techniques are applied at the same tory programs is the inability of developers, speculators, time new regulations are imposed in an effort to retain or landowners to profit from the increase in land value low intensity uses without destroying the developmen- when development potential cannot be realized because tal values of that land. In other cases these techniques of the regulatory program. are applied independently of new regulations, either to substitute permanent protection for land that had been Thus, land use planning agencies find themselves in the protected only by regulations, or to encourage landown- middle of a conflict between two competing interests. ers to voluntarily exercise their existing development On the one hand, there is a desire to protect and pre- rights in a different manner than allowed by existing serve agricultural or environmentally sensitive land and regulations. to prevent, or at least control, certain environmental and social costs commonly associated with land conversion. The most notable of these programs are purchase of On the other hand, development regulatory bodies are development rights (PDR) and transfer of development faced with vocal protests against any perceived diminu- rights (TDR).6 Both of these programs share the tion of property rights. These protests are particularly vocal if a new regulation is being imposed which would See Chapter 70, Florida Statutes, known as the Bert J. Harris Pri- further restrict land conversion; but they are heard even vate Property Rights Protection Act. Pursuant to the Harris Act, when a long standing regulation is not lifted during a there are ten means proposed in that are possible means to com- pensation a property owner for an inordinate burden: 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vermont Housing & Conservation Board Coronavirus Relief Fund
    PHOTO COURTESY OF SALLY MCCAY Vermont Housing & Conservation Board Coronavirus Relief Fund: Vermont’s Statewide Initiative WRITTEN BY MARY TINGERTHAL FOR THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS Brief Description of the Program In June 2020, as the pandemic drove a surge of homelessness, the Vermont Legislature turned to the Vermont Housing & Conservation Board (VHCB) to manage $33 million in federal CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). The goal was to keep people safe while also securing and rehabilitating permanent housing for households experiencing homelessness, and to make virus- protecting improvements in existing homeless shelters. By April 2020 there were more than 2,000 Vermonters reported as homeless, but most traditional shelters had temporarily closed because they were unable to meet Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) safety protocols. As with many other states and localities, Vermont’s Agency of Human Services quickly began using federal emergency relief funds to lease space in hotels and motels to provide safe emergency shelter. Non-profit housing developers and service providers in Vermont had already tested the idea of converting hotel and motel properties into supportive housing before the start of the pandemic. They had learned that buying hotels and converting them into housing, supported by payments from the State and from hospitals, was more cost effective than leasing hotel rooms, especially for medical recovery purposes. With this experience, VHCB quickly worked with these non-profit partners to develop a proposal to the State Legislature to use Coronavirus Relief Funds to create permanent housing for those who had none and to improve existing congregate shelters to comply with CDC COVID-19 guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment
    Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment DECEMBER 2020 DRAFT - 1 - Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment Special Thanks This report would not be what it is without the help of the project Steering Committee. They reviewed documents, attended meetings, provided information pertaining to their areas of expertise, and made time to provide relevant and applicable input throughout this entire process. For their comments, questions, thoughtful consideration, and critical feedback we say thank you! Steering Committee Members LaDonna Dunn, Town of Westfield Pat Sagui, Town of Westfield Alison Low, Northeastern Vermont Development Association Patrick Shattuck, RuralEdge Brian Pickard, RuralEdge Camoin 310 Project Team Rachel Selsky, AICP, Project Principal Amie Collins, Project Manager & Analyst This report was funded by a Municipal Planning Grant from the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development. Cover photo by LaDonna Dunn. - ii - Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment Town of Westfield Housing Needs Assessment DECEMBER 2020 Contents Executive Report ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Demographic Trends ...................................................................................................................................................................13 Housing Supply Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Housing & Conservation Board MINUTES Thursday, June 21
    Vermont Housing & Conservation Board MINUTES Thursday, June 21, 2018 Middlebury Regional Emergency Medical Services Conference Room 55 Collins Drive, Middlebury Board Members: Neil Mickenberg, David Marvin, Emily Wadhams, Maura Collins (designee for Sarah Carpenter, VHFA), Angus Chaney (designee of Al Gobeille, AHS), Billy Coster (designee of Julie Moore, ANR), Hannah Sessions, Tom Yahn, Diane Bothfeld (designee of Anson Tebbetts, VAAFM), Josh Laughlin, Kate McCarthy VHCB Staff: Gus Seelig, Karen Freeman, Elizabeth Egan, Anne Duffy, Marcy Christian, Larry Mires, Martin Hahn, Nancy Everhart, Jen Hollar, Hannah Phillips, Gretchen Rittenhouse, Craig Peltier, Kathleen Kanz, Beth Schwarz, Jenny Hyslop, Mark Martin, Pam Boyd, Rick DeAngelis, Ben Canellys Others Present: Samantha Dunn (Housing Vermont); Allen Karnatz, Tracy Zschau, Jon Ramsay, Donald Campbell, Nick Richardson, Britt Haselton, Joan Weir (Vermont Land Trust); Chris Boget (LCLT); Jeff Kantor; Brian Pickard and Becky Masure (Rural Edge); Jon Cohen (Prospect Mountain Association), Sarah Fisher (Wilmington Select board member) and Bridget Keenan (former Mt. Anthony Union High School Nordic team member); Nick Warner (Winooski Valley Park District); Jeff Kantor (Consultant), Brian Pickard, Becky Masure (Rural Edge) Neil Mickenberg called the meeting to order at 10:20 am. PROJECT PRESENTATIONS Prospect Mountain Ski Area, Woodford – Vermont Land Trust 2018-068-001 Vermont Land Trust is requesting a grant of $300,000 to assist in acquiring the Prospect Mountain Nordic Ski Center in Woodford, Vermont. The staff recommendation is $285,000. The Prospect Mountain Association, a fledgling nonprofit group, is working with the Vermont Land Trust to buy the recreation area in southern Vermont from the longtime owners Steve Whitham and Andrea Amodeo.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Plan Draft
    Housing Plan Draft I. HOUSING OVERVIEW According to the 2010 Census, there are 37,123 housing units in the Northeast Kingdom, an increase of 9.4% from 33,939 units in the previous decade. The Census defines a “housing unit” as a house, apartment, mobile home, group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the Northeast Kingdom’s population in 2010 was 64,692, which represents a modest increase of 3.6% from the 2000 Census, Figure 5.1: Population and Housing Changes far slower rate of growth than the region in the Northeast Kingdom, 2000-2010 has seen in prior decades. The increase in housing units significantly outpaced the 15.0% 9.9% 10.0% rate of population change, even in Essex 9.6% 10.0% 6.3% County, which saw a net loss in 4.9% 3.6% population. (Figure 5.1) 5.0% 2.8% Municipalities throughout the Northeast 0.0% Kingdom that lost population still saw in Caledonia Essex Orleans Vermont -5.0% -2.2% an increase in housing units: Bloomfield, Brighton, Danville, East Haven, Population Change (%) Housing Change (%) Hardwick, Guildhall, Lemington, Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census Lunenburg, Sheffield, and Victory. The exceptions to the rule were Canaan, Greensboro, Norton, and Newport City. Figure 5.2: Caledonia Changes in Population & Housing Units, 2000-2010 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% Pop change % Housing Change % Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census Regional Housing Plan Page 1 Figure 5.3: Essex Changes in Population & Housing Units, 2000-2010 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% Pop change % Housing Change % Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census Figure 5.4: Orleans Changes in Population & Housing Units, 2000-2010 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% Pop change % Housing Change % Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census Seasonal Housing A partial explanation for the discrepancy between population growth rates and housing units is the disproportionate share of seasonal and vacation housing.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Housing Future: Challenges and Opportunities Public Draft
    California's Housing Future: Challenges and Opportunities Public Draft Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents.....................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Snapshot: The Current State of Housing Affordability in California .......................................................... 5 Projected Housing Needs Through 2025 ............................................................................................. 5 1.8 Million New Homes Needed by 2025 .......................................................................................... 5 Past Production ................................................................................................................................ 5 Demographic Trends Drive Housing Needs......................................................................................... 6 Population Household Growth ......................................................................................................... 7 Race and Ethnicity Population Trends .............................................................................................. 8 Vulnerable Populations ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of LYNDON PLANNING COMMISSION June 12, 2019 Meeting Minutes Approved 6/26/19
    TOWN OF LYNDON PLANNING COMMISSION June 12, 2019 Meeting Minutes Approved 6/26/19 Planning Commissioners: Sean McFeeley, Sylvia Dodge, Emily Irwin, Tammy Martel Public Official(s): Annie McLean Press: None Public: Peter Morrissette, Sherlyn Morrissette, Steve Gray, Marty Feltus, Joe Buzzi, Bob Howland, Brian Pickard, Patrick Shattuck, Peter H. Blair, Jay Iselin, James Mayer Sean McFeeley chaired the meeting, which was called to order at 6:05 p.m. and introduced the Envision Lyndon 2020 Town Plan Housing Community Planning Workshop. Annie McLean provided some background information on the structure of the Town Plan and facilitated a series of breakout activities designed to capture community input for the Town Plan Update. Sean McFeeley made a motion to approve the minutes of May 29, 2019. Sylvia Dodge seconded the motion. The Commission voted 4-0. Annie McLean noted that the Envision Lyndon – 2020 Town Plan Update town-wide mailing had been sent out. Sylvia Dodge inquired about submissions for the photo/artwork contest. Ms. McLean noted that some interest had been expressed but that no entries had been received at this point. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for June 26th at 6:00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: AMclean ~PC_minutes_061219 Page 1 of 1 HOUSING Statewide Housing Goals: To plan development so as to maintain the historic settlement pattern of compact village and urban centers separated by rural countryside. • Intensive residential development should be encouraged primarily in areas related to community centers, and strip development along highways should be discouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruraledge Rental Application Updated 2 September 2021.Pdf
    48 Elm Street P.O. Box 259 Lyndonville, VT 05851 800.234.0560 TTY 800.253.0191 ruraledge.org Please find the enclosed application for RuralEdge Property Management. Thank you for your interest in our properties. Applicants will be placed on a waitlist for the properties and bedroom sizes they choose. We will send a letter to the mailing address on file to the top applicants on the waitlist once we have a vacant unit. It is VERY IMPORTANT that you answer each question on the application. DO NOT LEAVE ANY QUESTIONS BLANK. If the question does not apply to you, please write N/A. If you leave questions unanswered, the application will be returned for you to complete. Each person over 18 on the application must sign on the signature pages. Each household member, including children, are required to submit a copy of their social security card and a copy of a birth certificate, driver’s license, and/or passport. If you have questions, do not hesitate to call us at 802-535-3555. Thank you, Rural Edge Property Management FORM REVISED Form Common Rental RENT SEPTEMBER State of Vermont’s Application for Housing in Housing Community Vermont 2021 Instructions (not for tenant-based vouchers) Please type or print in ink the information requested on this form. If you need language translation or an interpreter, notify the FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date/time received: management company. Please read through this application carefully. Incomplete or unsigned applications will be returned. Use additional sheets if necessary. Please return completed application to: Management company Agent name I wish to apply for housing at (Property name): Location FAMILY COMPOSITION Complete the following information for each person who will live in your apartment.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Assistance Return Parts II and III to VSHA
    Equal Housing Opportunity Provider Vermont State Housing Authority One Prospect Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802-828-1991; Fax: 802-828-2111; Message Line: 1-800-820-5119; TTY: 1-800-798-3118 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Application for Assistance Thank you for your interest in the Housing Choice Voucher Program. Please make sure to read the instructions below prior to submitting your application as there is important information of which you should be aware. PLEASE KEEP THESE INSTURCTIONS FOR YOUR RECORDS Return Parts II and III to VSHA Vermont State Housing Authority operates the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program primarily through telephone, mail and electronic correspondence. If you have questions feel free to contact the Intake Department directly. If you would like to meet with staff it is best to call for an appointment to insure availability. If you or anyone in your family is a person with disabilities and you need a reasonable accommodation to complete this application, please refer to the “Notice of Right to Reasonable Accommodation” on page 2. Vermont State Housing Authority will provide free interpretation services to clients who have limited English Proficiency. If you move and do not update your address, your file may be inactivated during our update. You will need to re-apply. Please answer all questions on the application form. Do not leave any questions blank. If a question does not apply to you, please write “none”. All Yes or No questions must be checked (√). If you need more space to answer a question, please attach one or more pages to the application.
    [Show full text]
  • NVRH Community Health Needs Assessment
    2015 NVRH Community Health Needs Assessment Laural Ruggles MPH, MBA Marketing and Community Health Improvement [email protected] Table of Contents The Communities We Serve 1. A description of our service area and basic demographics Process and Methods 2. A description of the process and methods used for the assessment Community Input 3. A description of the input received from those who represent the broad interests of the community Priority Areas 5. A description of the process and criteria used in prioritizing health needs in the area Data Tables 6. Resource Inventory and Partners by Health Priority 9. Summary of County Health Rankings for Caledonia County 10. Appendix: List of Secondary Data Sources Community Windshield Survey Description of Community Visit Process Essex County Environmental Scan 1 Northeastern Vermont Regional Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment 2015 The Communities We Serve Northeastern Vermont Regional Hospital is located in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom; an area known for its rugged rural beauty, and equally rugged and independently spirited people. The area is a mix of rolling hills, mountains, and river valleys. The primary service area for NVRH is just over 30,000 people. (Vermont State Data Center, 2013) The area is quite rural with a population density in Caledonia county of 48.1 persons per square mile and only 9.5 persons per square mile in Essex county (US Census Quick Facts). Both counties are bordered by the Connecticut River to the east. State regulators define the service area as the 18 towns and their villages in Caledonia and s. Essex counties in northeastern Vermont: Barnet town, Burke town, Danville town, Kirby town, Lyndon town, Newark town, Sheffield town, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Organizations
    DIRECTORY OF ORGANIZATIONS STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Summer 2021 (Updated June 1, 2021) Table of Contents Federal and State Housing Agencies ............................................. 1 Public Housing Authorities ............................................................ 2 Community Land Trusts and Housing Development Corps. ....... 3 Regional Planning Commissions ................................................... 5 Regional Development Corporations ............................................. 7 Community Action Agencies .......................................................... 9 Agencies on Aging .........................................................................11 Related Housing Organizations ................................................... 12 NeighborWorks® Organizations and Homeownership Centers.. 13 Vermont's Congressional Delegation .......................................... 14 Federal and State Housing Agencies Vermont Department of Housing and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Community Development (DHCD) Development (HUD) Josh Hanford, Commissioner Sean Thomas, Field Office Director 1 National Life Drive Vermont State Office Deane C. Davis Building, 6th floor 95 Saint Paul Street, Suite 440 Montpelier, VT 05620-0501 Burlington, VT 05401-4486 Phone: (802) 828-3211 Phone: (802) 951-6290 Fax: (802) 828-3258 Fax: (802) 951-6298 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: accd.vermont.gov/housing U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Vermont Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan Conditions and Issues Volume Recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission: January 27, 2015 (P&Z Res
    Village of DeForest Comprehensive Plan Conditions and Issues Volume Recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission: January 27, 2015 (P&Z Res. 2015-903) Adopted by Village Board: March 3, 2015 (Ord. 2015-011) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VILLAGE OF DEFOREST BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Judd Blau, President Jason Kramer, Trustee Paul Blount Ken Clark, Trustee Ken Clark Scott Reigstad Jeff Miller Lee Fritz Dick Josephson Bob Noonan Jason Kramar Mike Raether Chip Van Meter Jim Simpson PLANNING CONSULTANT MAPPING CONSULTANT ENGINEERING CONSULTANT MDRoffers Consulting LLC Vandewalle and Associates, Inc. Vierbicher Associates, Inc. 4324 Upland Drive 120 East Lakeside St. 999 Fourier Drive, Suite 201 Madison, WI 53705 Madison, WI 53715 Madison, WI 53717 (608) 770-0338 (608) 255-3988 www.mdroffers.com www.vandewalle.com VILLAGE STAFF VILLAGE OF DEFOREST Rachel Holloway, Planning & Zoning Administrator 306 DeForest Street Mike Centinario, Former Planning & Zoning Administrator DeForest, WI 53532 Steve Fahlgren, Village Administrator/Finance Director http://www.vi.deforest.wi.us/ Deane Baker, Director of Public Works Kelli Bialkowski, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Sam Blahnik, Community Development Director LuAnn Leggett, Village Clerk & Deputy Administrator Adopted: March 3, 2015 Page | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Code City of Tehachapi, CA
    Zoning Code City of Tehachapi, CA Hearing Draft October 2014 Prepared by Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. This page intentionally left blank Contents Article 1 Intent Chapter 1.10 Purpose and Application 1-3 1.10.010 Purpose of Zoning Code 1-3 1.10.020 Applicability of the Zoning Code 1-3 1.10.020 Compliance 1-4 Chapter 1.20 Authority and Administration of Zoning Code 1-5 1.20.010 Authority of Zoning Code 1-5 1.20.020 Responsibility for Administration 1-5 1.20.030 Rules of Interpretation [new] 1-6 Article 2 General to All Chapter 2.10 Traditional Neighborhood Development Site Planning Standards 2-3 2.10.010 Purpose 2-3 2.10.020 Applicability 2-3 2.10.030 Site Planning Standards for Walkable Neighborhoods 2-3 Article 3 Specific to Zones Chapter 3.10 Purpose and Application 3-3 3.10.010 Purpose 3-3 3.10.020 Official Regulating Plan and Zones 3-4 3.10.030 Transect Zones 3-4 3.10.040 Non-Transect Zones 3-5 3.10.050 Zone Annexation 3-5 3.10.060 Change of Zone Designation 3-5 Tehachapi Zoning Code | June 2014 Public Review Draft | iii Contents Chapter 3.20 Transect Zones 3-7 3.20.010 Purpose 3-7 3.20.020 Applicability 3-7 3.20.030 Rural Edge (T2) Zone 3-10 3.20.040 Rural General (T2.5) Zone 3-14 3.20.050 Neighborhood Edge (T3) Zone 3-18 3.20.060 Neighborhood General (T4) Zone 3-22 3.20.070 Neighborhood Center (T4.5) Zone 3-26 3.20.080 Downtown (T5) Zone 3-30 3.20.090 Tehachapi Blvd.
    [Show full text]