The Two FIGO Systems for Normal and Abnormal Uterine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Received: 18 May 2018 | Revised: 23 July 2018 | Accepted: 6 September 2018 | First published online: 10 October 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12666 FIGO SPECIAL ARTICLE Gynecology The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions Malcolm G. Munro1,2,* | Hilary O.D. Critchley3 | Ian S. Fraser4 | for the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee 1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Abstract University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Background: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) sys- 2 Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical tems for nomenclature of symptoms of normal and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA in the reproductive years (FIGO AUB System 1) and for classification of causes of AUB 3MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, The Queen’s Medical (FIGO AUB System 2; PALM- COEIN) were first published together in 2011. The pur- Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK pose was to harmonize the definitions of normal and abnormal bleeding symptoms 4School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Royal Hospital for Women, University of New and to classify and subclassify underlying potential causes of AUB in the reproductive South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia years to facilitate research, education, and clinical care. The systems were designed to *Correspondence be flexible and to be periodically reviewed and modified as appropriate. Malcolm G. Munro, Kaiser Permanente, Objectives: To review, clarify, and, where appropriate, revise the previously Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. published systems. Email: [email protected] Methodology and outcome: To a large extent, the process has been an iterative one Participating Members of the FIGO Menstrual involving the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee, as well as a number of invited Disorders Committee, 2015–2018 are listed contributions from epidemiologists, gynecologists, and other experts in the field from at the end of the paper. around the world between 2012 and 2017. Face- to- face meetings have been held in Rome, Vancouver, and Singapore, and have been augmented by a number of telecon- ferences and other communications designed to evaluate various aspects of the sys- tems. Where substantial change was considered, anonymous voting, in some instances using a modified RAND Delphi technique, was utilized. KEYWORDS Abnormal uterine bleeding; Adenomyosis; Anovulatory bleeding; Arteriovenous malformation; Coagulopathy; Endometrial hyperplasia; Endometrial polyp; FIGO; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Heavy uterine bleeding; Intermenstrual bleeding; Irregular menstrual bleeding; Irregular uterine bleeding; Isthmocele; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Metrorrhagia; PALM-COEIN 1 | INTRODUCTION origin.1–9 Approximately one third of women are affected at some time in their life.3,6 Many of the published studies are restricted to estimates The worldwide impact of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in the repro- of the prevalence of the symptoms of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); ductive years is substantial, with a prevalence of approximately 3%–30% when other symptoms, particularly those of irregular and intermenstrual among reproductive aged women. The reasons for the wide spectrum bleeding are included, the prevalence rises to 35% or higher.9 of estimates are unclear but vary with age, being higher in adolescents Available evidence suggests that as many as half of affected women and in the fifth decade of life, and varying somewhat with country of do not seek medical care, even if they have access to a healthcare Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018; 143: 393–408 wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ijgo © 2018 International Federation of | 393 Gynecology and Obstetrics 394 | MUNRO ET AL. provider,4,5,8 a circumstance that may explain the variation in reported and management, but also to be flexible enough to provide effective prevalence. The manifestations vary from modest to severe disruption linkages with laboratory and research aspects. of work productivity and quality of life,10,11 and increasing maternal The present report updates the FIGO recommendations for both morbidity and mortality for pregnant women with pre- existing AUB- FIGO- AUB Systems 1 and 2, including clarifications on terminologies related anemia.12,13 and definitions, as well as modifications in the PALM- COEIN system In 2011, recognizing the international need created by the impact that include reassignment of some entities, and guidance for subclas- of AUB, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics sification of leiomyomas, much of which has been preliminarily pub- (FIGO), published a pair of systems and a set of clinical recommenda- lished.18–20 These changes represent structured deliberative processes tions with the aim of informing and aiding clinicians and investigators in that include use of a modified RAND Delphi process applied to the the design and interpretation of investigations into AUB in the repro- attendees of a series of FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee (MDC) ductive years, as well as the provision of evidence- based clinical care.14 sponsored expert meetings. To allow this report to function inde- The present manuscript was designed to provide a detailed update pendently, and to provide context, there exists substantial but neces- on the FIGO recommendations concerning terminologies, definitions, sary overlap with the original publication,14 and with other subsequent and underlying causes of AUB in the reproductive years. Revised ter- and related publications produced by the MDC since 2011.18–24 minologies and definitions of normal menstrual parameters, and the The FIGO MDC is currently working on subclassification systems for symptoms of AUB were initially published in 2007,15,16 while the sem- adenomyosis and endometrial polyps. The adenomyosis subclassifica- inal 2011 publication14 presented both systems—Terminology and tion system is the most advanced and will be published soon in prelimi- Definitions (FIGO- AUB System 1) and Classification of Causes of AUB in nary form with planned validation studies to follow. The polyp system is the Reproductive Years, the PALM- COEIN system (FIGO- AUB System being developed but a release date has not yet been determined. There 2). From the beginning, it was determined that these recommendations is consideration for subclassification systems for AUB- C, - O, - E, and –I, should be flexible and subject to ongoing regular review to incorpo- but these initiatives are still in the very early stages of development. rate results of new research and analysis. These review periods were It is important that clinicians recognize that these FIGO systems relate intended to broadly coincide with the triennial FIGO World Congresses. solely to assessment and management of nongestational AUB. There are The first key recommendations, published simultaneously in 2007 other causes of genital tract bleeding and urinary tract or gastrointestinal in Fertility Sterility and Human Reproduction,15,16 recommended a bleeding that do not come from the uterus. These can usually be identi- substantial revision of existing terminologies and definitions for the fied by an appropriate case history and physical examination. description of AUB features and, by doing so, redefined the normal parameters of menstrual bleeding. Recommended was the abolition of terms (largely of Latin and Greek origin) such as menorrhagia, metror- 2 | ACUTE VERSUS CHRONIC rhagia, and dysfunctional uterine bleeding, which were poorly defined, NONGESTATIONAL AUB IN THE used internationally in a disparate manner, and had no consistent REPRODUCTIVE YEARS meaning for the general and academic communities.15–17 The second key publication14 presented a novel and pragmatic In the original system,14 FIGO introduced the concept of nonges- approach to classification of the underlying causes of AUB in non- tational acute AUB in the reproductive years, distinguishing it from pregnant women. No such systematic classification of underlying chronic AUB—an approach endorsed by the American College causes existed at that time. This 2011 manuscript introduced the of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.25 These definitions remain PALM- COEIN classification based on clinical- and imaging- based unchanged for 2018. Chronic nongestational AUB in the reproductive stratification of causes into “structural” pathologies that can be years is defined as bleeding from the uterine corpus that is abnormal “imaged” and/or defined histopathologically (Polyps, Adenomyosis, in duration, volume, frequency, and/or regularity, and has been pre- Leiomyomas and Malignancy or atypical endometrial hyperplasia; sent for the majority of the preceding 6 months. Acute AUB, on the PALM). The remaining causes were categorized as “non- structural”, other hand, is defined as an episode of heavy bleeding that, in the in that they cannot be imaged, but clinical assessment with detailed opinion of the clinician, is of sufficient quantity to require immediate history and appropriate physical examination, sometimes supported intervention to minimize or prevent further blood loss. Acute heavy by laboratory testing, can largely imply or make a diagnosis of cause menstrual bleeding may present in the context of existing chronic (Coagulopathies, Ovulatory disorders, primary Endometrial disorders, AUB or can occur in the absence of such a background history.