Rational Rhapsody Frameworks and Operating Systems Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Rational Rhapsody Frameworks and Operating Systems Reference Before using the information in this manual, be sure to read the “Notices” section of the Help or the PDF available from Help > List of Books. This edition applies to IBM® Rational® Rhapsody® 7.5 and to all subsequent releases and modifications until otherwise indicated in new editions. © Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2009. US Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. ii Contents Frameworks and Operating Systems . 1 Real-Time Frameworks . 1 Rational Rhapsody Statecharts . 2 The Object Execution Framework (OXF). 3 Working with the Object Execution Framework . 3 The OXF Library. 4 Rational Rhapsody Applications and the RTOS. 5 Operating System Abstraction Layer (OSAL). 5 Threads . 7 Stack Size . 7 Synchronization Services . 8 Message Queues . 8 Communication Port. 9 Timer Service . 10 Real-time Operating System (RTOS) . 11 AbstractLayer Package (OSAL) . 11 Classes . 12 OSWrappers Package . 12 Adapting Rational Rhapsody for a New RTOS . 13 Run-Time Sources . 13 Adding the New Adapter . 13 Creating the Batch File and Makefiles. 14 Sample <env>build.mak File . 15 Creating New Makefiles . 16 OXF Versions . 16 Animation Libraries. 16 Implementing the Adapter Classes . 18 Modifying rawtypes.h . 19 Other Operating System-Related Modifications . 19 Building the Framework Libraries . 20 Rational Rhapsody i Table of Contents Building the C or C++ Framework for Windows Systems . 20 Building the Ada Framework . 21 Building the Java Framework . 22 Building the Framework for Solaris Systems . 22 Creating Properties for a New RTOS . .24 Modifying the site<lang>.prp Files . 24 Setting the Environment . 26 Configuring the OXF Properties for the C++ Framework . 27 Validating the New Adapter . 30 Modifying the Framework . 31 Implementing the Abstract Factory. 31 Plugging in the Factory. 31 OSAL Methods. 34 The OSAL Classes . 37 Rational Rhapsody Developer for C . .38 RiCOSConnectionPort Class . 39 RiCOSEventFlag Interface . 45 RiCOSMessageQueue Class. .50 RiCOSMutex Class . 59 RiCOSOXF Class. 64 RiCOSSemaphore Class . 67 RiCOSSocket Class . 73 RiCOSTask Class . 80 RiCOSTimer . 93 RiCHandleCloser Class . 97 Rational Rhapsody Developer for C++ . 98 OMEventQueue Class . 98 OMMessageQueue Class . .100 OMOS Class . 100 OMOSConnectionPort Class . .102 OMOSEventFlag Class . ..

610

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Rational Rhapsody Family from IBM Collaborative Systems Engineering and Embedded Software Development 2 the Rational Rhapsody Family from IBM
IBM Software Design and Development The Rational Rhapsody family from IBM Collaborative systems engineering and embedded software development 2 The Rational Rhapsody family from IBM Model-driven development helps build a Uniﬁed Modeling Language (UML) standards. Throughout competitive edge the development process, the Rational Rhapsody family assists How do systems engineers and software developers, creating in managing complexity through visualization and helps main- embedded and real-time applications, meet the demands for tain consistency across the development life cycle to facilitate complex, robust deliverables—especially when there is little agility in response to ever changing requirements. time to produce, let alone test, the systems and software before they go into production? With its robust SysML/UML-based environment and model- driven development (MDD) approach, the Rational Rhapsody In ﬁelds such as automotive electronics, avionic controls, family of products helps in addressing the needs of both sys- next-generation wireless infrastructures, consumer electronics, tems engineers and software developers. The IBM Rational medical devices and industrial automation, systems engineers Rhapsody family of products has been recognized by engineers and software designers are facing intense global competition. and developers as the leading MDD solution in a wide variety of industries including aerospace, defense, automotive, To overcome these challenges, IBM provides the telecommunications, medical devices, consumer electronics, IBM®
[Show full text]
Com.Telelogic.Rhapsody.Core
com.telelogic.rhapsody.core Package Class Use Tree Serialized Deprecated Index Help PREV PACKAGE NEXT PACKAGE FRAMES NO FRAMES All Classes Package com.telelogic.rhapsody.core Interface Summary The IRPAcceptEventAction interface represents Accept Event IRPAcceptEventAction Action elements in a statechart or activity diagram. The IRPAcceptTimeEvent interface represents Accept Time Event IRPAcceptTimeEvent elements in activity diagrams and statecharts. The IRPAction interface represents the action defined for a IRPAction transition in a statechart. The IRPActionBlock interface represents action blocks in IRPActionBlock sequence diagrams. The IRPActivityDiagram interface represents activity diagrams in IRPActivityDiagram Rational Rhapsody models. IRPActor The IRPActor interface represents actors in Rhapsody models. The IRPAnnotation interface represents the different types of IRPAnnotation annotations you can add to your model - notes, comments, constraints, and requirements. The IRPApplication interface represents the Rhapsody application, IRPApplication and its methods reflect many of the commands that you can access from the Rhapsody menu bar. The IRPArgument interface represents an argument of an IRPArgument operation or an event. IRPASCIIFile The IRPAssociationClass interface represents association classes IRPAssociationClass in Rational Rhapsody models. The IRPAssociationRole interface represents the association roles IRPAssociationRole that link objects in communication diagrams. The IRPAttribute interface represents attributes of
[Show full text]
IBM Rational Rhapsody Case Studies
IBM Rational Rhapsody IBM Rational Rhapsody Case Studies © 2011 IBM Corporation Software and Systems Engineering | Rational Tap into Pools of Productivity To free up time for innovation with automation & integration IBM Collaborative Average Developer time lost to delays in designDesign completion Management Traditional approach 55.3 person-months World Model-driven 29.6 person-months Project savings $257,000 development (MDD) World MDD with 20.0 person-months Project savings $353,000 IBM Rational Source: 2011 EMF Study A move to architecture & design best practices and integrated solutions will significantly free up time for innovation © 2011 IBM Corporation Software and Systems Engineering | Rational Embedded Market Leadership VDC data shows IBM/Rational as the market leader of standard language-based, embedded software / system modeling tools for the 2011 calendar year*. IBM/Rational 74% Others 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% percent of dollars 2011 •Source: 2012 Software & System Lifecycle Management Tools Market Intelligence Service, Volume 1: Software & System Modeling Tools – April 2012, VDC Research © 2011 IBM Corporation 3 4 Software and Systems Engineering | Rational The Quantified RoI (1 of 2) Business Challenge Rational Solution Business benefit Examples in italics below, Customer Examples (Product/Feature) (links to references) Improve productivity across product Automated generation of full production code for C, C++, Java, and - Speed and time to value Alps Electric Co., Ltd. development team Ada allows developers to focus on model level structural and behavioral design - Development cut by 50-60% - Faster delivery of software components that are in Seamless host/target development enabling development and test synch with the design before hardware available Valtech India Systems Pvt.
[Show full text]
The Rational Rhapsody Family from IBM Collaborative Systems Engineering and Embedded Software Development 2 the Rational Rhapsody Family from IBM
IBM Software December 2012 Complex and Embedded Systems The Rational Rhapsody family from IBM Collaborative systems engineering and embedded software development 2 The Rational Rhapsody family from IBM Break down engineering and Building innovative products requires collaboration from development silos cross-discipline teams, which may include mechanical, electrical, How do systems engineers and software developers, creating management, quality assurance and many others. Central embedded and real-time applications in fields such as automo- design-sharing through IBM Rational Rhapsody Design tive, electronics, avionic controls, next-generation wireless Manager software helps the extended team to share, trace, infrastructures, consumer electronics, medical devices and indus- review and analyze design and lifecycle information earlier trial automation, collaborate across multiple disciplines and meet to avoid costly integration errors later. the complex requirements to deliver safe and robust systems— especially when there is little time to produce, let alone test, Additionally, support is available for advanced requirements the systems and software before they go into production? management and analysis, customizable documentation genera- tion, graphical prototyping, automated model-based unit testing, To overcome these challenges, IBM provides the The MathWork Simulink integration and more. IBM® Rational® Rhapsody® family of products, delivering key capabilities for the IBM Rational Solution for Systems & Collaboration for faster, more agile design Software Engineering. and development Defining solid architectures and designs help teams address The powerful, flexible design and development capabilities of the growing complexity of today’s embedded systems. Getting the Rational Rhapsody family of products provide a systems the design right is critical to helping teams break down the engineering and embedded software development solution complexity to manageable pieces and reduce costly rework later.
[Show full text]
IJIR Paper Template
Vol-2 Issue-3 2016 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396 Analysis of Design Patterns in Java with Rational Rhapsody as the New Building Blocks of Software Engineering Bhushan Bharat Ghatkar1, Amruta Ramchandra Pandhare2 1 Student, MCA SEM VI, DES’s NMITD, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2 Student, MCA SEM VI, DES’s NMITD, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India ABSTRACT The use of object-oriented design patterns in Software development is being analysis in this paper. Design patterns are solutions to common problems that developers faced during software development. In this study, we analysis Design Patterns by using Rhapsody in Java. We show how Java language features affect the implementation of Design Patterns using Rhapsody, analysis some potential Java programming patterns, and demonstration of how studying design patterns can contribute to provide the reusable solution to a commonly occurring problem within a given idea in software design. Keywords: Design Patterns, Java, Rational Rhapsody, Object-Oriented. 1. INTRODUCTION s we developed more complex computer systems, we are going to face difficulties in construction rather A than difficulties in analysis. The difficulties in developments are solved by designing programming solutions for such difficulty in the context of the software application we are trying to develop . Some constructional problems occur over and over again across a wide range of different Software. Obviously, we can design a common solution to such repeating problems, and then try to adjust such a common solution to the specific need of the software we are currently building. Such common solutions are usually referred to as design patterns. Design Patterns are very popular among software developers.
[Show full text]
Interpretation Problems in Code Generation from UML State Machines - a Comparative Study
Interpretation Problems in Code Generation from UML State Machines - a Comparative Study Anna Derezi ńska, Marian Szczykulski Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland A.Derezinska @ii.pw.edu.pl Abstract. A practical utilisation of a model-driven approach to an information system development is hampered by inconsistencies causing interpretation problems. This paper focuses on the state machine that is a common means for modelling behaviour. A transformation of classes with their state machines into a code assists in the efficient development of reliable applications. A set of interpretation problems of state machines was revisited in accordance with the UML specification and examined on model examples transformed to an executable code. The paper compares the implementation of the problems regarding to two tools that support the transformation and takes into account the most comprehensive set of the UML behavioural state machine concepts. The tools are the IBM Rational Rhapsody, which transforms state machines to C, C++, Java, Ada and the Framework for eXecutable UML (FXU) dealing with the C# code. The basic information about the FXU tool is also given. Keywords: UML state machines, statecharts, semantic variation points, UML model to code transformation 1 Introduction The Unified Modelling Language (UML) is a notation commonly used in different phases of an information system development. UML models can be employed to describe static and dynamic aspects of a system from different viewpoints. They constitute a basis for Model Driven Engineering (MDE) [1], where model transformations are used for system development and verification. Building applications based not only on structural models, like class diagrams, but also on behavioural models is considered to be an issue of a sheer practical importance.
[Show full text]
Unified Modeling Language (UML)
Annals of the University of North Carolina Wilmington Master of Science in Computer Science and Information Systems A UML BASED COMPARISON OF MODEL TRANSFORMATION TOOLS Adalia C. Hiltebeitel A Capstone Project Submitted to the University of North Carolina Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Computer Science Department of Information Systems and Operations Management University of North Carolina Wilmington 2013 Approved by Advisory Committee ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Devon Simmonds Dr. Bryan Reinicke _______________________________ Dr. Ronald Vetter _______________________________ Dr. Laurie J. Patterson, Chair Abstract A UML Based Comparison of Model Transformation Tools. Hiltebeitel, Adalia C. 2013. Capstone Paper, University of North Carolina Wilmington. This Capstone provides an overview of Model Design Engineering (MDE) and identifies some transformation tools for the Model Driven Architecture (MDA) approach. This capstone report provides an overview of the main MDE concepts with a focus on Unified Modeling Language (UML). It provides an overview of various model transformation tools, and selects three from the group for further evaluation. The findings of this report confirm that MOLA and BOTL are still in the developmental stages and do not satisfy identified ideal requirements of a robust model transformation tool. The third tool, Rational Rhapsody Developer is fully developed and can assist a system architect in building
[Show full text]
Systems Engineering
December 2009 | Volume 12 Issue 4 A PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING What’s Inside Model-Based Systems Engineering: The New Paradigm President’s Corner SysML Tools Inclusive Thinking for INCOSE’s Future 3 RSA/E+/SysML No Magic/SysML RSA/E+/SysML Operational Factory Excavator Excavator Model System Model Scenario Executable Special Feature Scenario Introduction to this Special Edition on Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) 7 Interface & Transformation Tools SysML: Lessons from Early Applications and Future Directions 10 (VIATRA, XaiTools,…) Model-based Systems Engineering for Systems of Systems 12 Traditional Traditional Descriptive Tools Simulation & Analysis Tools MBSE Methodology Survey 16 Model Center NX/MCAD Tool Optimization Using Model-based Systems Engineering to Supplement the Excavator Model Certification-and-Accreditation Process of the U.S. Boom Model Ansys Mathematica Department of Defense 19 Reliability Factory CAD FEA Model Model Factory Executable and Integrative Whole-System Modeling via the Layout Model Application of OpEMCSS and Holons for Model-based Excel Dymola Dig Cycle Cost Model Systems Engineering 21 Excel Model Production MBSE in Telescope Modeling 24 Ramps eM-Plant Factory Model-based Systems Praxis for Intelligent Enterprises 34 Simulation 2009-02-25a The Challenge of Model-based Systems Engineering for Space Systems, Year 2 36 Integrating System Design with Simulation and Analysis The Use of Systems Engineering Methods to Explain the Using SysML 40 Success of an Enterprise
[Show full text]
A Standard Methodology Enabling Execution of Models Described in Sysml Demonstrated in a Model Based Systems Engineering Approac
A Standard Methodology Enabling Execution of Models Described in Sysml Demonstrated in a Model Based Systems Engineering Approach Toward Developing a Space Situational Awareness System Implemented in Cubesats Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Lutfi, Mostafa Citation Lutfi, Mostafa. (2020). A Standard Methodology Enabling Execution of Models Described in Sysml Demonstrated in a Model Based Systems Engineering Approach Toward Developing a Space Situational Awareness System Implemented in Cubesats (Master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 09:21:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/648677 A STANDARD METHODOLOGY ENABLING EXECUTION OF MODELS DESCRIBED IN SYSML DEMONSTRATED IN A MODEL BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH TOWARD DEVELOPING A SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED IN CUBESATS by Mostafa Lutfi ____________________________ Copyright © Mostafa Lutfi 2020 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2020 2 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis has been made successful through constant advice and guidance of my advisor Dr. Ricardo Valerdi, Professor in Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, The University of Arizona. In this regard, I would like to pay my heartfelt gratitude to him for his time and constant encouragement throughout my work.
[Show full text]
Ada-Europe 2010 That Will Take Place June 2010 in Valencia, Spain
ADA Volume 30 USER Number 2 June 2009 JOURNAL Contents Page Editorial Policy for Ada User Journal 66 Editorial 67 News 69 Conference Calendar 98 Forthcoming Events 106 K. Fairlamb “Ada UK Conference 2009” 111 Articles from the Industrial Track of Ada-Europe 2009 J. S. Harbaugh “Pattern-Based Refactoring Shrinks Maintenance Costs” 115 Ada-Europe 2009 Tutorials Q. Ochem “Building Cross Language Applications with Ada” 119 R. I. Davis, I. Broster “Execution Time: Analysis, Verification and Optimization for Reliable Systems” 121 P. Rogers “Software Fault Tolerance” 125 Ada Gems 129 Ada-Europe Associate Members (National Ada Organizations) 132 Ada-Europe 2009 Sponsors Inside Back Cover Ada User Journal Volume 30, Number 2, June 2009 66 Editorial Policy for Ada User Journal Publication Original Papers Commentaries Ada User Journal — The Journal for Manuscripts should be submitted in We publish commentaries on Ada and the international Ada Community — is accordance with the submission software engineering topics. These published by Ada-Europe. It appears guidelines (below). may represent the views either of four times a year, on the last days of individuals or of organisations. Such March, June, September and All original technical contributions are articles can be of any length – December. Copy date is the last day of submitted to refereeing by at least two inclusion is at the discretion of the the month of publication. people. Names of referees will be kept Editor. confidential, but their comments will Opinions expressed within the Ada Aims be relayed to the authors at the discretion of the Editor. User Journal do not necessarily Ada User Journal aims to inform represent the views of the Editor, Ada- readers of developments in the Ada The first named author will receive a Europe or its directors.
[Show full text]