DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Management Strategy Coyote Springs Desert Wildlife Management Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Management Strategy Coyote Springs Desert Wildlife Management Area Conservation Management Strategy Coyote Springs Desert Wildlife Management Area Clark County, Nevada February 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Mojave Desert population of desert tortoises has been declining since the 1970s and was declared threatened under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. Impacts of urban growth, agriculture, recreation, and other human activities—coupled with the rise of predators and disease—are thought to be the major causes of tortoise decline. Over the past 16 years, several attempts to define and implement specific Conservation Actions (CAs), strategies, and plans have been proposed to protect the tortoise and other species considered imperiled. Clark County and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) entered into the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) as a binding commitment to protect 78 species, including the tortoise, by providing a commitment to implement specific CAs. Subsequent to the MSHCP, a site-specific conservation management strategy (CMS) is required for each of four areas in Clark County known as Desert Wildlife Management Areas (DWMAs). The intent of the CMS is to guide management actions and to unite federal, state, and local agencies in coordinated, adaptive management for each DWMA. This document is a CMS for the Coyote Springs DWMA, which encompasses the Desert National Wildlife Refuge, Coyote Springs Investment, and Coyote Springs area of critical environmental concern (ACEC), and is almost entirely preferred desert tortoise habitat of creosote- bursage vegetation on gentle plains and bajadas. Along its northern boundary, a large residential and resort development has the potential to impact conservation efforts. Construction of roads and utility rights-of-way (ROWs), as well as increased human activity, may introduce serious threats to the future viability of desert tortoise populations in the DWMA. The purpose of this CMS is to consolidate and prioritize CAs and guide their implementation. This document consists of eight chapters: • Chapter 1 reviews the background leading to the present situation, the need for and purpose of the CMS, and the process of its development. It also details steps that will be taken to involve and educate the public in conservation efforts. • Chapter 2 describes the Coyote Springs planning area. It identifies gaps in the knowledge base needed to complete the CMS, reviews the existing environment and the current status of desert tortoise populations, and presents current land uses and future potential scenarios. • Chapter 3 defines the purpose of the CMS and provides conservation objectives to achieve that purpose in the context of existing federal and state policies and mandates. • Chapter 4 reviews a suite of previously proposed CAs. It assesses funding sources and staffing necessary to implement them, describes their potential effects, and ranks them based on cost–benefit ratios. • Chapter 5 recommends, in order of priority, 12 new CAs that build on the existing base to evaluate the current status of recovery in the DWMA, address gaps in knowledge, and provide a long-term research, monitoring, and management plan. Specific projects, tasks, and performance measures for each action are included. • Chapter 6 describes the implementation plan for the 12 new CAs and provides a timeline for CMS review and assessment. • Chapter 7 lists references. COYOTE SPRINGS DESERT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY iii E XECUTIVE S UMMARY • Chapter 8 lists frequently used acronyms in the CMS. The following is a summary of the 12 new CAs described in Chapter 5. Priority CA 1—Identify where, how many, and to what extent CAs previously defined in the Clark County MSHCP have been implemented. Priority CA 2—Determine whether current levels of law enforcement staffing are sufficient to identify and quickly remedy human behaviors that negatively impact conservation. Priority CA 3—Provide managers with specific information on how and where outreach and education programs and materials are being used, whether they are effective, and how they need to be improved. Priority CA 4—Immediately establish monitoring programs for species about which very little is known concerning their distribution and abundance. Priority CA 5—Collect the results of existing research and monitoring efforts and investigate new methods of assessing threats to determine the extent and severity of human activities on sensitive species and habitats. Priority CA 6—Develop a comprehensive, centralized database to track the status of conservation efforts. Priority CA 7—Provide managers with reliable quantitative measures to more effectively evaluate conservation success using methods such as remote sensing and satellite imagery. Priority CA 8—Develop a monitoring program to determine the effectiveness of each CA. Monitoring should consist of hypothesis-based studies that measure tortoise and habitat responses before and after implementation of recovery actions. Priority CA 9—Establish a timeline for review and update of the CMS as the results of research and monitoring become available. Priority CA 10—Pursue a research program to identify tortoise movement patterns. Priority CA 11—Conduct long-term research studies on the biology and ecology of juvenile and hatchling tortoises and relate their survival rates to tortoise population viability and persistence. Priority CA 12—Pursue research aimed at recognizing, diagnosing, and treating tortoise diseases and establishing clear standards to accurately determine the health status of the tortoise population. The implementation plan of this CMS is meant to act as a guide for carrying out the CAs in consecutive steps. Changes to the CAs, to their priority ranking, and to the time frame for their implementation may occur as additional information is collected and analyzed and as funding and resources fluctuate. The adaptive management approach followed by this plan, and required by the MSHCP, links conservation strategies to the findings of research and monitoring activities over time. This CMS recommends continuous periodic review and revision of the CMS to produce the most effective plan over the long term. iv COYOTE SPRINGS DESERT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY CONTENTS Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................iii 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Need................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Public Participation ........................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Website.................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.2 Stakeholder Mailing List......................................................................................... 4 1.4.3 Electronic Newsletters ............................................................................................ 4 1.4.4 Press Releases ......................................................................................................... 5 1.4.5 Public Scoping Meetings......................................................................................... 5 1.5 Document Structure........................................................................................................... 5 2. Background, Inventory, and Assessment....................................................................................... 7 2.1 Planning Area .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Gaps in Information Needed to Complete Strategy........................................................... 8 2.3 Existing Environment........................................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Desert Tortoise Listing............................................................................................ 9 2.3.2 Relevant Plans and Literature ................................................................................. 9 2.3.3 Land Ownership and Resource Management........................................................ 11 2.3.4 Human Use and Condition.................................................................................... 16 2.3.5 Biotic and Abiotic Factors .................................................................................... 21 2.4 Species Conditions .......................................................................................................... 25 2.4.1 Habitat Description ............................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Habitat Condition.................................................................................................. 25 2.4.3 Tortoise Population Estimates............................................................................... 26 2.4.4 Landscape Context...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helping Wild Lands Heal
    FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS Keeping Nevvvada Wild Since 1984 WINTER 2005 Wilderness stewardship enters a new phase Helping Wild Lands Heal By Brian Beffort Because wilderness designation does not guaran- Wilderness Restoration tee landscapes will remain free of human impacts, In coordination with the BLM, we have sched- invasive plant species and other threats, Friends of uled wilderness restoration trips to help wildlands Nevada Wilderness is committed to working on the heal from impacts. These trips get volunteers out to ground to ensure a wilderness legacy for the future. wildlands, where they can enjoy the area’s beauty We accomplish this with our three Wilderness and help restore damaged habitat. Friends and the Stewardship programs: Adopt A Wilder- BLM will also be offering a series of Leave No ness, Leave No Trace and Wilderness Trace trips, to teach people how to travel Restoration. We invite you to become a Adopt a lightly on the land. Often these trips in- “Wilderness Warrior” and join us in the wilderness clude an opportunity to camp in the wild wild. Not only will you help us achieve today, and with other fun and like-minded volun- results on the ground, but you’ll meet teers. There’s often work for all skill and other dedicated wilderness defenders help keep ability levels. The only essential qualifica- and get to know wild Nevada. Nevada tion you need is a passion for wilderness. wild. A schedule of projects is listed below. Adopt A Wilderness Nevada is a big state with a lot of wilderness- Leave No Trace Happy quality lands, and there simply aren’t enough of us Developed over decades by National Outdoor Birthday here at Friends of Nevada Wilderness to keep tabs Leadership School and the Leave No Trace Center on all wild lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Zone, Southwestern Utah: Implications for Initiation of a Major Miocene Transfer Zone
    Paleomagnetic results from the eastern Caliente- Enterprise zone, southwestern Utah: Implications for initiation of a major Miocene transfer zone Michael S. Petronis1,*, Daniel K. Holm2, John W. Geissman3, David B. Hacker2, and Billie J. Arnold2 1Environmental Geology, Natural Resource Management Department, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, New Mexico 87701, USA 2Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA 3Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, ROC 21, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080-3021, USA ABSTRACT large and statistically signifi cant. For exam- defi ne the CEZ after Axen (1998) as the region ple, site P-18 from the Bauers Tuff yields an encompassing all transverse structures whether The Miocene Caliente-Enterprise zone R = –61.1° ± 5.3° and F = –0.6° ± 5.0°. Rela- or not they include evidence for counterclock- (CEZ) in southwestern Utah (USA) is a tive to the expected Miocene direction, in situ wise vertical axis rotation. Displacement trans- 20–50-km-wide east-northeast–trending left- paleomagnetic data from the Iron Axis lac- fer systems, or accommodation zones, are often lateral transfer zone that displaces north- coliths, specifi cally the Three Peaks laccolith, subvertical fault systems that transfer displace- south–trending crustal blocks of the eastern yield a mean that is discordant in declination, ment from one region of the crust to another Basin and Range Province to the west. Pre- with estimated R = –22.2° and F = –8.8° val- (Moustafa, 1976; Bosworth, 1985, 1986; Lister vious paleomagnetic results from the central ues. These rotation and fl attening estimates, et al., 1986; Rosendahl, 1987; Chapin, 1989; and western CEZ show signifi cant counter- although consistent with the overall data set Faulds et al., 1990; Faulds and Varga, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada Reno Hydrogeologic Significance Of
    University of Nevada Reno Hydrogeologic Significance Of Landsat Thematic Mapper Lineament Analyses In The Great Basin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Hydrology/Hydrogeology by Paul Edward McBeth Jr. MINE* l ibr ar y 1^1 ;£3i 5 The thesis of Paul E. McBeth Jr. is approved: A ) 3 5 ____ /.'i Thesis Advisor University of Nevada Reno July, 1986 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank his advisors for their technical guidance, literary critiques and encouragement. Dr. Clarence Skau, Dr. Steve Wheatcraft, Dean James Taranik and Michael Dettinger spent a considerable amount of their time throughout the two years of my Masters program providing direction and advice. In addition, I would like to recognize and thank my wife, Sharon. Her love and support allowed me to dedicate one hundred percent of my time towards graduate school. Finally, I must thank my daughter Andrea, who unknowingly provided excellent encouragement through the last several months of work on this thesis. IV ABSTRACT Hydrogeologic Significance of Landsat Thematic Mapper Lineament Analyses In The Great Basin Paul E. MeBeth Jr. University of Nevada, Reno July, 1986 Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper digital data covering the Coyote Spring Valley area of southeastern Nevada was enhanced to produce a false color composite image that highlighted lineaments. Lineaments were analyzed based on their statistical distribution and with correlations to geologic maps, regional ^ geophysics (aeromagnetics and gravity) and field discontinuity data to produce a conceptual model of aquifer conditions of the southern White River Flow System.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Spring Valley Hydrographic Basin 13-210
    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES TIM WILSON, P.E. STATE ENGINEER COYOTE SPRING VALLEY HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN 13-210 GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE INVENTORY CALENDAR YEAR 2019 Field Investigated by: Christi Cooper Report Prepared by: Christi Cooper TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 1 HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................ 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ..................................................................................... 3 GROUNDWATER LEVELS ......................................................................................................... 3 METHODS TO ESTIMATE PUMPAGE ...................................................................................... 4 TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ 6 APPENDIX A. COYOTE SPRING VALLEY 2019 GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE BY APPLICATION NUMBER. ............................................................................................. 10 APPENDIX B. COYOTE
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    B L M U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Issuance of Authorizations to Nevada Department of Wildlife for Wildlife Water Development Inspection, Maintenance and Repairs within BLM Wilderness Areas in Nevada DRAFT: December 1, 2011 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Lead Office — Ely District Office Southern Nevada District Office Environmental Assessment: Issuance of Authorizations to Nevada Department of Wildlife for Wildlife Water Development Inspection, Maintenance and Repairs within BLM Wilderness Areas in Nevada: DOI-BLM-NV- L030–2012–0003–EA DRAFT: December 1, 2011 Environmental Assessment iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Identifying Information: ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Title, EA number, and type of project: .................................................................. 1 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action: ................................................................................ 1 1.1.3. Name and Location of Preparing Offices: ............................................................. 1 1.1.4. Identify the subject function code, lease, serial, or case file number: ................... 1 1.1.5. Applicant Name: ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology and Potential for Ground-Water Development, Carbonate-Rock Aquifers, Southern Nevada and Southeastern California
    Hydrogeology and Potential for Ground-Water Development, Carbonate-Rock Aquifers, Southern Nevada and Southeastern California By Thomas J. Burbey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 95-4168 Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF NEVADA Carson City, Nevada 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0286 email: [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract.........................................................................................................................._^ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrogeology of Southern Nevada ........................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................^^ 6 Potential
    [Show full text]
  • The Nevada Mining Association's Lincoln County Wilderness Study
    The Nevada Mining Association’s Lincoln County Wilderness Study Area Position Paper A Review of Wilderness Study Areas in Lincoln County Nevada. Part: 1 Lincoln County Land Use Patterns Part: 2 Individual WSA’s EXHIBIT E1 Wilderness Document consists of 72 pages. ; Entire document provided. 1 Due to size limitations, only three panels are provided. A copy of the complete document is available through the Research Library (775/684-6827) or e-mail [email protected]). Meeting Date: 01-23-04 Lincoln County L L NMA L L NMA CLOVER MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA 1. THE STUDY AREA - 84,935 acres The Clover Mountains WSA (NV-050-139) is located in southern Lincoln County, Nevada, approximately twelve miles south of Caliente, Nevada, in the western Clover Mountains. The WSA contains 84,935 acres of BLM land with no split estate lands or private inholdings. Along the southwest side, from the intersection of Pennsylvania Canyon and Meadow Valley Wash southerly, the boundary is formed by the Union Pacific Railroad tracks or the adjoining access road, whichever is more easterly, except for a tract of private land. At the private land, the boundary is formed by a combination of the private land and the access road. The southern boundary is formed by extending a line easterly from the midline of Section 3, T.8S., R.67E., approximately along a ridgeline, to the approximate center of Section 4, T.8S., R.68E., at map elevation 4,671'. From there the line extends southeasterly, point to point, to the northern slopes of Garden Mountain, thence northerly and easterly across the lower slopes of the Clover Mountains, point to point, to a point about one mile north of Sam's Camp Well.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley, and Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuges
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley, and Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Volume I – August 2009 National Wildlife Refuge System Mission To administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-1832 Sacramento, CA 95825 August 2009 Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley, and Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Ren Loeheffner, Regional Director, Region 8 For Further Information: Cynthia Martinez, Project Leader Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 (702) 515-5450 Abstract: The Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Final CCP/EIS) provides a description of the preferred alternative and other alternatives developed for each refuge, the refuges’ affected environments, and environmental consequences of implementing the alternatives. The alternatives for each refuge address wildlife, habitat, and cultural resources management and opportunities for compatible recreation to help achieve refuge purposes, visions, and goals. The Final CCP/EIS includes revisions to the Draft CCP/EIS, which was circulated for public review and comment between July 11 and September 9, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Geologic Cross Sections of Parts of the Colorado, White River, and Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow Systems, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Revised Geologic Cross Sections of Parts of the Colorado, White River, and Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow Systems, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona By William R. Page, Daniel S. Scheirer, Victoria E. Langenheim, and Mary A. Berger Open-File Report 2006–1040 Revised June, 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NCA - 000543 U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, SECRETARY U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, 2011 Revised June, 2011 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Page, W.R., Scheirer, D.S., Langenheim, V.E., and Berger, M.A., 2011, Revised geologic cross sections of parts of the Colorado, White River, and Death Valley regional groundwater flow systems, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1040, Denver, CO, 80225. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. NCA - 000544 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Spring Valley, White Pine County, Nevada
    Effects of Groundwater Transport from Cave, Delamar, and Dry Lake Valleys on Terrestrial Ecosystems of Lincoln and adjacent Nye and White Pine Counties, Nevada 12 November 2007 David Charlet, Ph.D. Professor of Biology College Southern Nevada Henderson NV 89002 Location and Physical Setting Cave, Delamar, and Dry Lake Valleys are large, high, dry valleys in southeastern Nevada (Figure 1). Collectively, the valleys are about 10-15 km from west to east throughout most of their 170 km north to south length. The valleys are topographically connected, and run parallel to and east of the White River and Pahranagat Valleys. The North and South Pahroc Ranges and the Hiko Range separate Delamar and Dry Lake Valleys from the White River and Pahranagat Valleys. The southern tip of the Egan Range separates Cave Valley from the White River Valley. The system lies mainly within Lincoln County, except for portions of western Cave Valley which extends into Nye County and northern Cave Valley, which extends into White Pine County, Nevada. Cave, Delamar, and Dry Lake Valleys are like most Nevada valleys in that they trend from north to south and are situated between mountain ranges. These valleys are considerably higher than those to west, and like those to the west, are progressively lower from north to south (Table 1). Few springs flow in these valleys. In Delamar Valley, aside from water that accumulates at the playa, the nearest free-flowing water is 8 km from the valley floor and 500m in elevation above in the Delamar Mountains at Jumbo Springs. The water from a few springs in the mountains around Dry Lake Valley is diverted to tiny reservoirs at valley low points in the south (Point of Rocks Reservoir) and in the north (Bullfrog Reservoir).
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted for Privacy. Abstract Approved: "T/ Dr
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Daniel Glenn Carpenter for the degree ofMaster of Science in the Department of Geology presented onjj February 1989 Title: GEOLOGY OF THE NORTH MUDDY MOUNTAINS.CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA AND REGIONAL STRUCTURAL SYNTHESIS: FOLD-THRUST AND BASIN-RANGE STRUCTURE IN SOUTHERN NEVADA.SOUTHWEST UTAH, AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract approved: "T/ Dr. R. S. Yeats The North Muddy Mountains are locatedin southern Nevada, about 65 km northeast of Las Vegasand near the eastern boundary of the Basin and Rangeprovince. The north-south-trending range block is bounded on theeast and west, respectively, by east- and west-dipping,high-angle normal faults. Sevier age contractional and Cenozoic age extensional structures are present in the range. The Summit thrust and Willow Tankthrust crop out, respectively, on the southwest and northeastsides of the North Muddy Mountains. A newly mapped thrustsegment connects the Summit and Willow Tank thrusts. It juxtaposed Jurassic on Cretaceous age rocks.The most recent displacement on the thrust is bracketed between95.8+1-3.5 Ma (age of youngest deformed rocks) and 93.1+/- 3.4 Ma (age of oldest overlying undefornied beds). These numbers indicate an Albian to Turonian(?) age rangefor the thrust. The Summit-Willow Tank thrust sheet waslater folded by a northwest-southeast-trending, southwest inclined foldtrain by displacement on the Arrowhead fault, aMiocefle and possibly younger(?) extensional structure. The oldest (Albian) synorogenicdeposits in the area contain exotic clasts of formations that werenot involved in local thrusting; the debris was transportedeastward from older thrust sheets. Younger (Cenoinanian) synorogenicbeds are composed of Mesozoic age clastsat the base of the section, grading to early paleozoic age clasts nearthe top (reverse clast stratigraphy).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the East-Central Meadow Valley Mountains, and Implications for Reconstruction of the Mormon Peak Detachment Fault, Nevada
    48 CHAPTER 3 Geologic map of the east-central Meadow Valley Mountains, and implications for reconstruction of the Mormon Peak detachment fault, Nevada Swanson, E.M., and Wernicke, B.P. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 For submission to Geosphere 49 ABSTRACT The role of low-angle faults in accommodating extension within the upper crust remains controversial, because their existence markedly defies extant continuum theories of how crustal faults form, and once initiated, how they continue to slip. Accordingly, for many proposed examples, basic kinematic problems like slip direction, dip angle while active, and magnitude of offset are keenly debated. A prime example is the Mormon Peak detachment and overlying Mormon Peak allochthon of southern Nevada, whose origin and evolution have been debated for several decades. Here, we use geologic mapping in the Meadow Valley Mountains to define the geometry and kinematics of emplacement of the Mormon Peak allochthon, the hanging wall of the Mormon Peak detachment. Identifiable structures well suited to constrain the geometry and kinematics of the detachment include a newly mapped, Sevier-age monoclinal flexure in the hanging wall of the detachment. The bounding axial surfaces of the flexure can be readily matched to the base and top of the frontal Sevier thrust ramp, which is exposed in the footwall of the detachment to the east, in the Mormon Mountains and Tule Springs Hills. Multiple proxies, including the mean tilt direction of hanging wall fault blocks, the trend of striations measured on the fault plane, and other structural features, indicate that the slip direction along the detachment is approximately S75W (255°).
    [Show full text]