Final Report

Prepared by:

December 2012

Final Report

Table of Contents Executive Summary...... 1 Introduction...... 4 Definitions ...... 4 ADA Standards...... 7 Standard Plan Review ...... 7 Washington State Agencies ...... 7 City of Lewiston ...... 8 Nez Perce County...... 9 Public Involvement Summary ...... 9 Public Involvement Plan ...... 9 Public Involvement Goals ...... 9 Tasks/Activities ...... 9 Inventory Methodology ...... 13 Inventory Plan and Coordination with Other Plans ...... 13 Needs Assessment ...... 14 Training Materials and Training Course ...... 14 Field Inventory...... 14 Quality Control of Inventory Data ...... 15 Public Access Locations ...... 15 Compiled GIS Dataset...... 16 Summary of Inventory Findings ...... 16 Curb Ramps ...... 16 Sidewalk...... 19 Transit Stops...... 21 Prioritization Criteria Recommendations ...... 23 Location Based Prioritization Criteria ...... 24 Compliance Based Prioritization Criteria...... 24 Composite Score ...... 25 Public Requests ...... 25 Next Steps for Member Agencies...... 25 Funding Opportunities ...... 26

December 2012 Final Report

References and Links...... 27 Appendix A - Standard Plan Review ...... 28 Appendix B - Public Involvement Materials ...... 41 Appendix C - Inventory Priorities ...... 73 Appendix D - Data Dictionaries ...... 76 Appendix E - Inventory Data Maps...... 80

December 2012 Final Report

Executive Summary

The Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (LCVMPO) initiated the Public ADA Facilities Inventory to identify mobility barriers within the public rights-of-way throughout the MPO boundary. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), signed into law in 1990, is a civil rights statute prohibiting discrimination against people who have disabilities. It requires that all public entities undergo a self- evaluation, or inventory, of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way. The inventoried data will be used to create an ADA Transition Plan that identifies how ADA compliance will be achieved.

The scope of work for the Public ADA Facilities Inventory included an intensive public involvement process as well as the actual field inventory and creation of a GIS dataset of pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way for future member agency use. The dataset includes sidewalks, curb ramps and transit stops in the Lewis-Clark Valley.

Public Involvement The public involvement process was characterized by community involvement that was early, continuous, meaningful, and inclusive during the life of the project. As such, the Public Involvement Plan (PIP) developed at the project startup became a “living document” that was used for quality assurance by the project team and client as a way to ensure that the public had ample opportunities to be involved. Furthermore, the public involvement effort helped create public “buy-in” and support for the Public ADA Facilities Inventory. Refer to page 10 for a table of all public involvement tasks and goals.

Public Involvement Goals:  Identify key stakeholders and obtain early feedback for the development of the PIP  Effectively communicate project purpose and public involvement opportunities to the Lewis- Clark Valley community  Employ various methods of outreach to involve the general pubic  Obtain public opinion and input  Collect and catalog data reflective of public concern and comment  Evaluate public input  Summarize the process

The project team used multiple methods to achieve the public involvement goals, including stakeholder meetings, mailings, posters, E-newsletters, newsletters, public meetings and an interactive project website.

Standard Plan Review Each member agency within the LCVMPO had the opportunity to submit their standard plans for an ADA compliance review as part of the Public ADA Facilities Inventory project. The City of Asotin, Asotin County and the City of Clarkston use WSDOT standard plans. A brief review shows that those standard

December 2012 1

Final Report

plans appear to meet ADA requirements, with two minor exceptions. Nez Perce County does not have pedestrian facility standard plans. The City of Lewiston’s plans were submitted and reviewed. The results are shown on page 8 and redlines of the plans are located in Appendix A.

Field Inventory Methodology The scope of work for the inventory portion of the project included the following:  Needs assessment (data dictionary) - page 11  Training materials and training course - page 12  Field inventory - page 12  Post processing and quality control of inventory data - page 12  Public access locations dataset - page 13  Compiled GIS database - page 13

Field Inventory Results The inventory began in May of 2012 and completed in July of 2012. Curb ramps, sidewalks, transit stops, and locations in need of sidewalk or curb ramps were measured and inventoried. Noncompliant driveways were noted as obstructions in the sidewalk during the inventory. These features and other physical obstacles that may limit accessibility were documented using GPS units. During the inventory process, 3,555 curb ramp locations, 2,872 sidewalk segments and 57 transit stops were collected. For the purpose of this project, a curb ramp location is a point where there is an existing curb ramp or there is a need for a curb ramp. A sidewalk segment is a section of existing sidewalk or a section where sidewalk is needed in order to provide a complete pedestrian access route. A segment is no longer than a block and terminates where the sidewalk intersects a roadway or the sidewalk characteristics, such as width, material or condition, change. Transit stops are locations where passengers board or depart PTBA or Lewiston Transit busses. The inventory data was post processed, checked for quality and analyzed for compliance with ADA requirements.

Of the 3,555 curb ramp locations inventoried throughout the LCVMPO, there were 2,114 locations that did not have a curb ramp, 1,435 locations that were noncompliant and 6 locations that were compliant with all ADA requirements. The most common compliance issues for curb ramps were steep running slope, insufficient landing size, steep landing slope, noncompliant or missing detectable warning, half inch or greater lip present at the transition from the ramp to the street, and steep flowline slope. For additional information refer to page 16 and Appendix D.

Of the 2,872 sidewalk segments inventoried, there were 849 locations that did not have sidewalk or a pedestrian pathway, 1,754 locations that were noncompliant and 269 locations that were compliant. The most common compliance issues for sidewalk segments were narrow sidewalk width, steep cross slope, steep grade, surface discontinuities present, and obstructions that narrow the width of the pedestrian path. For additional information refer to page 19 and Appendix D.

Of the 57 transit stops inventoried, there were 54 locations that were noncompliant and 3 locations that were compliant with all ADA requirements. The most common compliance issues for transit stops

December 2012 2

Final Report

within the LCVMPO include surface discontinuities present, noncompliant dimensions, noncompliant connection between the transit stop and sidewalk or pedestrian path, steep parallel grade, and steep perpendicular grade. For additional information refer to page 21 and Appendix D.

Prioritization Criteria Recommendations It is recommended that the member agencies within the MPO adopt a prioritization method that takes into consideration the current compliance and location of a curb ramp, sidewalk or transit stop. Pedestrian facilities that are missing should be the highest priority followed by those that are most out of compliance. Facilities that are in locations that obtain a higher pedestrian use should be a higher priority than those that are used less frequently. Citizen requests and complaints should also be evaluated and moved to high priority as appropriate. For additional information refer to page 23.

Next Steps Each member agency within the MPO will use the inventory data and public input from this report (Public ADA Facilities Inventory) to develop an agency specific prioritization method for curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops in their public right-of-way. Agencies will also need to create a Transition Plan for pedestrian facilities within the public ROW, which will outline barriers to accessibility in the public right-of-way, methods for achieving compliance, and a schedule for future improvements. These plans will be used to identify which improvements to make in a prioritized manner, as funding becomes available. For additional information refer to page 25.

December 2012 3

Final Report

Introduction

It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis-Clark Valley that all residents and visitors easily move around the region, free of obstruction. This is not limited to automobiles, but also includes bicycles and pedestrians, and individuals with disabilities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the LCVMPO, which manages transportation planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties, conducted an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way for compliance with ADA.

The MPO contracted with a team of consultants involving H.W. Lochner and J-U-B Engineers to identify, measure, and catalog pedestrian facilities to determine compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help determine which facilities are in need of reconstruction or replacement to remove barriers to accessibility. This begins a process of improvement prioritization for the local agencies within the MPO. The goal of all the agencies is to use this information to develop agency specific Transition Plans as required in the ADA and construct projects as budgets allow.

Definitions

Accessible: Describes a facility in the public right-of-way that complies with the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right of Way (Published in the Federal Register on July 26, 2011).

Alteration: A change to a facility in the public right-of-way that affects or could affect pedestrian access, circulation, or use. Alterations include, but are not limited to, resurfacing, rehabilitation, reconstruction, historic restoration, or changes or rearrangement of structural parts or elements of a facility.

Blended Transition: A raised pedestrian street crossing, depressed corner, or similar connection between the pedestrian access route at the level of the sidewalk and the level of the pedestrian street crossing that has a grade of 5 percent or less.

December 2012 4

Final Report

Cross Slope: The grade that is perpendicular to the direction of pedestrian travel.

Curb Line: A line at the face of the curb that marks the transition between the curb and the gutter, street, or highway.

Curb Ramp: A ramp that cuts through or is built up to the curb. Curb ramps can be perpendicular, parallel, diagonal or a combination of parallel and perpendicular ramps.

Parallel Curb Ramp: All or part of the sidewalk ramps down to a street level crossing.

Perpendicular Curb Ramp: Ramp connects a sidewalk level landing to the street and cuts through the curb line at right angles.

Combined Curb Ramp: Generally, a combination of a parallel ramp and a perpendicular ramp. The sidewalk ramps down to a mid-level landing at a lesser curb height, thus allowing a shorter perpendicular run to connect to the street.

December 2012 5

Final Report

Diagonal Curb Ramp: A curb ramp located at the midpoint or apex of the curb radius or return and serves two crossing directions with a single cut. (Strongly discouraged by U.S. Access Board)

Facility: All or any portion of buildings, structures, improvements, elements, and pedestrian or vehicular routes located in the public right-of-way.

Grade Break: The line where two surface planes with different grades meet.

Pedestrian Access Route: A continuous and unobstructed path of travel provided for pedestrians with disabilities within or coinciding with a pedestrian circulation path.

Pedestrian Circulation Path. A prepared exterior or interior surface provided for pedestrian travel in the public right-of-way.

Public Right-of-Way: Public land or property, usually in interconnected corridors, that is acquired for or dedicated to transportation purposes.

PROWAC: Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, developed by the US Access board to ensure that sidewalks, pedestrian street crossings, pedestrian signals, and other facilities for pedestrian circulation and use constructed or altered in the public right- of-way by state and local governments are readily accessible to and usable by pedestrians with disabilities.

Running Slope: The grade that is parallel to the direction of pedestrian travel.

Sidewalk Segment: For the purposes of this project, a sidewalk segment is a section of existing sidewalk or a section where sidewalk is needed in order to provide a complete pedestrian access route. A segment is no longer than a block and terminates where the sidewalk intersects a roadway or the sidewalk characteristics, such as width, material or condition, change.

December 2012 6

Final Report

United States Access Board: The Access Board is an independent Federal agency devoted to accessibility for people with disabilities. The Board develops and maintains design criteria for the built environment, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and for electronic and information technology. It also provides technical assistance and training on these requirements and on accessible design and continues to enforce accessibility standards that cover federally funded facilities.

Vertical Surface Discontinuities: Vertical differences in level between two adjacent surfaces.

ADA Standards

The United States Access Board has developed standards for meeting the ADA. The ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAAG) give the minimum requirements for accessibility in buildings and facilities. The public right-of-way presents challenges to accessibility that are not covered in the ADAAG. To address these issues, the Access Board developed the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way (PROWAC) to provide specific guidance for providing accessible pedestrian facilities. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) supports the use of the PROWAC as recommended best practices consistent with the ADA’s requirement that facilities be designed and constructed to be accessible and useable by people with disabilities. The PROWAC is the primary reference used in addressing the ADA within the LCVMPO member agencies’ public rights-of-way.

The PROWAC was published in the Federal Register on July 26, 2011 and can be found online here: http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.pdf

Standard Plan Review Each member agency within the LCVMPO had the opportunity to submit their standard plans for an ADA compliance review as part of the Public ADA Facilities project.

Washington State Agencies The City of Asotin, Asotin County and the City of Clarkston use WSDOT standard plans. A brief review shows that the standard plans appear to meet ADA requirements, with two minor exceptions.  Although the plans require that the curb ramp be located within the width of the associated crosswalk, the plans do not specify that there must be a 4.0 ft. minimum by 4.0 ft. minimum clear space wholly within the pedestrian street crossing and wholly outside the parallel vehicle travel lane. (PROWAC R304.5.5)  In the July 2011 version of the PROWAC, the landing or turning space dimensions were changed to be 4.0 ft. minimum by 5.0 ft. minimum when the landing is constrained at the back of sidewalk on perpendicular curb ramps and when the landing is constrained on two or more sides on a parallel curb ramp. (PROWAC R304.2.1 and R304.3.1)

December 2012 7

Final Report

City of Lewiston The following comments address the City of Lewiston’s standard plans: Drawing PROWAC Number Comment Reference Specify that the 2 ft. width of the detectable warning is in the direction of R305.1.4 2-5 pedestrian travel. Page 85 2-10 Checked - appears to meet ADA requirements. - The PROWAC is now calling the “landing” a “turning space.” The current General - wording should be fine, as it is what contractors are familiar with. Insert Note: WHERE THE LANDING IS CONSTRAINED AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK, R304.2.1 2-11 THE LANDING SHALL BE 4’ MIN BY 5’ MIN. THE 5’ DIMENSION SHALL BE Page 79 PROVIDED IN THE DIRECTION OF THE RAMP RUN. R304.2.3 2-11 Flares should be 10% max, because they are in the pedestrian path. Page 80 Insert Note: R304.5.5 2-12 THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A 4’ X 4’ CLEAR SPACE OUTSIDE Page 83 VEHICLE TRAVEL LANES. Insert Note: WHERE THE LANDING IS CONSTRAINED ON 2 OR MORE SIDES, THE R304.3.1 2-12 LANDING SHALL BE 4’ MIN BY 5’ MIN. THE 5’ DIMENSION SHALL BE Page 80 PROVIDED IN THE DIRECTION OF THE PEDESTRIAN STREET CROSSING. Insert Note: WHERE THE LANDING IS CONSTRAINED AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK, R304.2.1 2-13 THE LANDING SHALL BE 4’ MIN BY 5’ MIN. THE 5’ DIMENSION SHALL BE Page 79 PROVIDED IN THE DIRECTION OF THE RAMP RUN. Insert Note: WHERE THE DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM GRADE BREAK TO THE BACK OF R305.2.1 2-14 CURB, X, IS MORE THAN 5’, THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL BE Page 86 PLACED ON THE LOWER LANDING AT THE BACK OF CURB. Insert Note: WHERE THE DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM GRADE BREAK TO THE BACK OF R305.2.1 2-15 CURB, X, IS MORE THAN 5’, THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL BE Page 86 PLACED ON THE LOWER LANDING AT THE BACK OF CURB. 2-16 Checked – appears to meet ADA requirements. - 2-17 Checked – appears to meet ADA requirements. - R304.2.3 2-18 Flares should be 10% max, because they are in the pedestrian path. Page 80 R304.2.3 2-19 Flares should be 10% max, because they are in the pedestrian path. Page 80 2-20 Checked – appears to meet ADA requirements. -

December 2012 8

Final Report

Redlines of the City of Lewiston standard plans are located in Appendix A.

Nez Perce County Nez Perce County does not have pedestrian facility standard plans. They currently use the latest copy of the American Association of State and Transportation Officials – A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, State of Idaho Transportation Department Standards and Policies, and the Manual of Highway and Street Standards prepared by the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council for road designs.

Public Involvement Summary

Public Involvement Plan The public involvement process was characterized by community involvement that was early, continuous, meaningful, and inclusive during the life of the project. As such, the Public Involvement Plan (PIP) developed at the project startup became a “living document” that was used for quality assurance by the project team and client as a way to ensure that the public had multiple opportunities to be involved. Furthermore, the public involvement effort helped create public “buy-in” and support for the Public ADA Facilities Inventory.

Public Involvement Goals  Identify key stakeholders and obtain early feedback for the development of the PI Plan  Effectively communicate project purpose and public involvement opportunities to the Lewis- Clark Valley Community  Employ various methods of outreach to Involve the general pubic  Obtain public opinion and input  Collect and catalog data reflective of public concern and comment  Evaluate public input  Summarize the process

Tasks/Activities Public involvement tasks and activities that were used for this project are summarized in Table 1. The task and associated public involvement goal are listed in the first column. The second column shows the schedule and the outcome for each public involvement activity.

December 2012 9

Final Report

Table 1. Public Involvement Tasks, Activities and Outcomes Task/Goal Schedule/Outcome Task: Initial Stakeholder Schedule: May 2012 Interviews Conducted with: Goal: Identify key  Robbie Barrutia, Idaho State Independent Living Council Executive stakeholders and obtain early Director feedback for the  Matt Jensen, LCVMPO Executive Director development of the PI Plan  Jim Martin, City of Clarkston Public Works Director  Sandi Hagemann, City of Lewiston Public Works  Julie Waltermire, Disability Action Center Northwest - Lewiston  Sherry Greenup and Reta Newman, Aging and Long Term Care – Clarkston  David Knittel, Community Action Network - Area Agency on Aging – Clarkston

Outcome: Identified issues that may be lingering below the surface, identified additional key stakeholders, determined what outreach techniques have been effective in the past, and drew out concerns up- front and early (See Appendix B).

Task: Project Kick Off Schedule: Kickoff Meeting - May 15, 2012 Meeting & Agency Participants: Representative Update  Matt Jensen, LCVMPO Executive Director  Sandi Hagemann, City of Lewiston Public Works  Julie Waltermire, Disability Action Center Northwest – Lewiston Goals: Identify key  Tanner Bramell, Disability Action Center Northwest – Lewiston stakeholders and obtain early  Reta Newman, Aging and Long Term Care – Clarkston feedback for the development of the PI Plan Outcome: Formalized the project purpose, message and public and provide a project status involvement activities, and identified additional stakeholders (See update. Appendix B)

Schedule: Agency Representative Update - July 25, 2012

Participants:  Matt Jensen, LCVMPO Executive Director  Sandi Hagemann, City of Lewiston Public Works  Jim Martin, City of Clarkston  Matt Layborn, Asotin County  Shawn Stubbers, City of Lewiston  Paul Goneseth, Washington State Department of Transportation

Outcome: Updated agencies on inventory and public involvement processes

December 2012 10

Final Report

Task: Project Information Schedule: Materials  Informational Mailer #1 (over 130 recipients) – 6/22/12  Informational Poster #1 (over 200 posted/distributed) – June 2012 Goal: Effectively  Informational Mailer #2 mailed (over 130 recipients) – 7/9/12 communicate project  Informational Poster #2 (over 200 posted/distributed) – July 2012 purpose and public  Informational Mailer #3 mailed (over 130 recipients) – 8/9/12 involvement opportunities to the Lewis-Clark Valley Outcome: Key project messages were carefully crafted and agreed Community upon by LCVMPO and consultants, and provided the base message for all communications materials. The brand for the project was developed for consistency in outreach materials. Distribution methods included:  Posting at public locations and community boards  Distribution by key stakeholder groups (groups identified below)  Distribution by inventory interns  Availability at agency offices

Messages focused on project education and public involvement opportunities (mailer/poster #1), public open houses (mailer/poster #2) and project completion/next steps (mailer #3).

Task: Website Schedule: (LCValleyADA.com)  50% complete - 6/5/12 (for review)  100% complete - 6/11/12 Goals:  Employ various Outcome: TLG developed a customized project website branded methods of outreach consistently with all project information material. The website to Involve the included: general pubic  Background  Obtain public opinion  Contact Information and input  Interactive Map  Collect and catalog  Public involvement opportunities data reflective of  Opportunity to provide comment public concern and  Public open house materials comment  Update information at key project milestones

Task: Media Outreach Schedule:  News Release #1 – 6/13/12 Goal: Employ various  News Release #2 – 7/17/12 methods of outreach to  Lewiston Morning Tribune public open houses advertisement – Involve the general pubic 7/22/12  Lewiston Morning Tribune public open houses advertisement – 7/25/12  LMTribune.com online banner open house advertisement - 7/16- 7/25/12

December 2012 11

Final Report

Task: Media Outreach Outcome: In addition to the two paper advertisements and the online (continued) advertisement, the Lewiston Morning Tribune ran print articles on 7/24/12 and 7/25/12. KLEW TV conducted an on-site story and

interview at the 7/25/12 Public Open House which ran on the 7/25/12 evening and 7/26/12 morning newscasts. Additionally, information was posted on the Tribune and KLEW Facebook pages on 6/18/12 and 7/23/12.

Task: E-Newsletter Schedule:  E-Newsletter #1 (36 emailed) – 6/12/12 Goal: Employ various  E-Newsletter #2 (36 emailed) – 7/20/12 methods of outreach to  E-Newsletter #3 (43 emailed) – 8/20/12 Involve the general pubic Outcome: The email newsletter provided interested community members with updates at key milestones and prior to all public involvement opportunities. Recipients included:  Existing key stakeholder distribution lists (groups identified below)  Interested parties that signed up through the website and other methods Messages focused on project education and public involvement opportunities (#1), public open houses (#2) and project completion/next steps (#3).

Task: Public Open Houses Schedule:  Draft materials for review by 7/18/12 Goals:  Idaho Public Open House (4-7 pm) – Lewiston Community Center -  Employ various 7/25/12 methods of outreach  Washington Public Open House (11 am-1 pm) – Asotin County to Involve the Library – 7/26/12 general pubic  Obtain public opinion Outcome: Two public open house-style meetings were held in and input Lewiston and Clarkston during the day and evening to accommodate  Collect and catalog as many people as possible. Fourteen total people attended the two data reflective of meetings and one comment form was submitted prior to the 8/9/12 public concern and comment deadline (See comment form and sign in sheets in Appendix comment B). Methods of notification included:  Inform the public  E-Newsletter about the inventory  Mailer process  Media outreach (coverage and advertising)  Public postings

December 2012 12

Final Report

Task: Stakeholder Database Schedule: Developed and completed

Goal: Collect and catalog Outcome: A database recorded all stakeholder interaction and contact data reflective of public information and was used throughout the project. concern and comment

Task: Stakeholder Schedule: Ongoing Availability Outcome: Point-of-contact for public inquiries, concerns and Goals: comments by email, phone or personal visit, worked closely with  Employ various LCVMPO to facilitate solutions and formulate responses. methods of outreach to Involve the general pubic  Obtain public opinion and input

Task: Final Report Schedule: Deliverable submitted at completion

Goals: Outcome: Public involvement summary  Evaluate public input Public involvement materials are located in Appendix B.  Summarize the process

Inventory Methodology

The scope of work for the inventory portion of the project included the following (see below for details):  Inventory Plan and coordination with other plans  Needs assessment  Training materials and training course  Field inventory  Quality control of inventory data  Public access locations  Compiled GIS database

Inventory Plan and Coordination with Other Plans Developing an inventory plan prior to field work is essential to the success of any ADA inventory. This included determining what feature characteristics would be recorded and how measurements were to be taken. The inventory plan helped maintain project-wide consistency and reduced the need for future field visits.

December 2012 13

Final Report

Existing plans, data, and other resources were reviewed and used to set inventory boundaries and develop priorities for the inventory work. Due to a limited budget, not all pedestrian facilities within the LCVMPO boundary could be inventoried at this time. It was important to use the available funding wisely and inventory those areas that would be most valuable to the member agencies.

Information from the following resources was used to determine the high priority areas within the inventory area and the order in which the inventory was to be completed:

 Asotin County Bike/Pedestrian Plan  Lewiston-Clarkston Downtown Circulation Study  Lewiston Sidewalk Master Plan Map of Network Connectivity  Additional information from member agency representatives

The inventory area and inventory priorities are located in Appendix C.

Needs Assessment A Needs Assessment, or Data Dictionary, was developed for the handheld GPS units and provided a streamlined form to assess curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops for potential ADA compliance issues. This allowed the inventory staff to effectively record the compliance of all necessary characteristics at each location, including slopes, widths and other components governed by ADA requirements. Drop- down menus and check boxes were built into the form to help make data collection more efficient and reduce human error.

Member agencies within the MPO will be able to use the data dictionary for inventorying future sidewalk, curb ramp and transit stop improvements. The data dictionary documentation is located in Appendix D.

Training Materials and Training Course Before beginning the inventory, an extensive training effort was conducted to ensure that the inventory data would be collected correctly and consistently throughout the LCVMPO boundaries. A project specific training manual was developed using the inventory plan. Each member of the inventory team completed a two-day training course where they learned the ADA requirements for the public right-of- way, how to measure all components of a ramp that pertain to compliance, and the correct operation of the inventory equipment and GPS units. The training course provided both classroom instruction and hands-on inventory training in the field. Member agencies were also invited to attend the training course and received training materials.

Field Inventory The inventory began May of 2012 and completed July 2012. This was conducted according to the inventory plan and priorities. Curb ramps, sidewalks, transit stops, and locations in need of sidewalk or curb ramps were measured and inventoried. Noncompliant driveways were noted as obstructions in the sidewalk during the inventory. These features and other physical obstacles that may limit accessibility

December 2012 14

Final Report

were documented using the custom data dictionary on the GPS units. Locations with no pedestrian facilities were not inventoried unless it was a gap in an existing facility or requested by the MPO or individual member agency.

During the inventory process, the inventory team downloaded the collected data and provided weekly progress reports to the project manager. When questions arose in the field, issues were resolved quickly via phone or text message. Weekly conference calls were also held throughout the process to ensure that field work was going smoothly and inventory protocol was being followed.

Once the data was collected, it was downloaded and differential correction was completed using GPS Pathfinder Office. The raw files were exported to shape files and merged into datasets for each of the LCVMPO’s member agencies using ArcGIS 10.0. Photos taken during inventory were compiled and linked to the final shape files.

Maps of the final inventory data are located in Appendix E.

Quality Control of Inventory Data Once the field data was processed, it went through a thorough in-office quality control review to identify missing or incorrect data to ensure that locations were correct to the greatest extent possible. In addition, during the initial stages of the inventory process, a portion of locations were field checked by a third party to ensure that the inventory data was being collected accurately and ADA compliance determinations were being made correctly. The field checks yielded good results for accuracy, with most inconsistencies likely being the result of level tolerance or slight difference in where the level was placed. There were very few blatant errors, but they were data entry errors rather than errors from lack of understanding and ADA requirement or measurement technique. The data quality continued to improve as the inventory process continued.

Public Access Locations The ADA (28 CFR 35.150 (d) (2)) states that priority should be given to ramps near state and local government offices and facilities, transportation facilities, places of public accommodation, and employers. These are locations that would receive higher pedestrian use or demand.

The LCVMPO and member agencies provided a list of local places of public access that were important to the communities within the MPO boundaries. These locations were geocoded to create shape files that each member agency can use in future prioritization efforts.

December 2012 15

Final Report

Compiled GIS Dataset The Lochner Team compiled the inventory data into GIS format and provided the following GIS shape files to LCVMPO:  One set of curb ramp and sidewalk shape files for each agency within the MPO. Each shape file only covers the extent of the specific agency.  One transit stop shape file that includes all transit stops in the Lewis‐Clark Valley.  One set of curb ramp and sidewalk shape files for each state (Idaho and Washington).  One shape file for each public access type (government, transportation, public accommodation, and employers) within the MPO. Each shape file will cover the entire MPO.

A map was also created, showing curb ramp locations, sidewaalks, and transit stops within the MPO boundary.

Summary of Inventory Findings

A large amount of data was collected during the Public ADA Facilities Inveentory. The table below shows how many curb ramps, sidewalk segments and transit stop locations were inventoried for each member agency.

Table 2. Number of Locations Inventoried by Agency Curb Sidewalk Transit Agency Ramps Segments SStops Asotin City 187 139 2 Asotin County 301 212 4 Clarkston 954 923 24 Lewiston 2113 1598 27 Total 3555 2872 57

Because Nez Perce County does not have any public pedestrian facilities within the LCVMPO boundary, it is not included in the tables and summaries.

Once the GIS datasets were compiled for curb ramps, sidewaalk segments aand transit stops, the data was analyzed for compliance with the ADA requirements. Each of the components in Table 3, Table 5, and Table 7 was reviewed. Overall, compliance with requirements was low, especially in older areas that were built before the current ADA standards.

Curb Ramps Curb ramp components related to ADA compliance were measured and examined during the field inventory. Compliance determinations were made in the field, using the technical requirements listed in the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right‐of‐Way, which was published on the Federal Register on July 26, 2011.

Table 3 shows the components of a curb ramp that were measured during the inventory. December 2012 16

Final Report

Table 3. Curb Ramp Components Measured During Inventory for Compliance Evaluation

Component ADA Requirement Ramp Ramp Width 48 inches minimum Running Slope 8.3% maximum Cross Slope 2.0% maximum with exception from R302.6.1 Flare Slope A 10.0% maximum if in pedestrian path Flare Slope B 10.0% maximum if in pedestrian path No discontinuities greater than half an inch vertical or horizontal. Vertical surface discontinuities between 0.25 in and 0.5 in shall be Discontinuities beveled with a slope not steeper than 50%. Landing Landing Size 4.0 ft. by 4.0 ft. minimum Maximum Slope 2.0% maximum Detectable Warning/Truncated Domes Depth 24 inches minimum in the direction of travel Width Must extend the full width of the curb cut Distance to Curb Line Within 8 inches of the curb line Color Contrast Contrast visually with surrounding area Base diameter of 0.9 in. minimum to 1.4 in. maximum; top diameter of 50% of base diameter minimum to 65% of base diameter Dome Dimensions maximum; height of 0.2 in; center to center spacing 1.6 in. minimum to 2.4 in. maximum; base to base spacing of 0.65 in. minimum. Transition Lip No surface discontinuities Gutter Counter Slope 5.0% maximum Gutter Flowline Slope 2.0% maximum Clear Space 4.0 ft. by 4.0 ft. minimum clear space within crosswalk Pedestrian Signal Pushbutton Height Pushbutton height within 15 to 48 inches of landing surface Distance from Landing Pushbutton within 10 horizontal inches of landing Median or Island Island Compliance Island Compliant with Section R305.4

Curb Ramp Summary Of the 3,555 curb ramp locations inventoried throughout the LCVMPO, there were 2,114 locations that did not have a curb ramp, 1,435 locations that were noncompliant and 6 locations that were compliant with all ADA requirements reviewed.

December 2012 17

Final Report

The distribution for curb ramp compliance among the member agencies is shown in Figure 1.

Number of Curb Ramps by Member Agency

1343 1400

1200

1000 767 Compliant 800 Noncompliant 554 600 No Ramp 399 400 169 131 200 100 86 1 1 1 3 0 City of Asotin Asotin City of City of County Clarkston Lewiston

Figure 1. Number of Curb Ramps by Member Agency

Locations that had a curb ramp were reviewed to determine what components appeared to have the most compliance issues. It varied slightly between member agencies, but the most common problems for curb ramps within the LCVMPO include:  Steep running slope  Steep cross slope  Insufficient landing size  Steep landing slope  Noncompliant or missing detectable warning  Half inch or greater lip present at the transition from the ramp to the street  Steep flowline slope

Table 4 shows the number of curb ramps with the deficiencies listed above for each member agency. It also shows the percentage of curb ramps with the deficiency.

December 2012 18

Final Report

Table 4. Common Noncompliant Curb Ramp Components Noncompliant Curb Rammp Component Running Cross Landing Lannding Detectable Half Inch Flowline Slope Slope Size Slope Waarning Lip Present Slope 55 76 55 75 90 77 72 City of Asotin 54.5% 75.2% 54.5% 74.3% 89.1% 76.2% 71.3% 99 108 118 146 153 76 86 Asotin County 58.2% 63.5% 69.4% 85.9% 90.0% 44.7% 50.6% City of 288 256 289 343 309 252 167 Clarkston 72.0% 64.0% 72.3% 85.8% 77.3% 63.0% 41.8% 471 504 371 649 700 453 392 City of Lewiston 61.2% 65.5% 48.2% 84.3% 90.9% 58.8% 50.9% 913 944 833 1213 1252 858 717 LCVMPO Total 63.4% 65.5% 57.8% 84.2% 86.9% 59.5% 49.8%

Sidewalk Sidewalk components related to ADA compliance were measured and examined during the field inventory. Determinations were made in the field about which components were compliant or noncompliant, using the technical requirements listed in the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right‐of‐Way. Noncompliant driveways within sidewalk segments were noted as obstructions during the inventory.

Table 5 shows the sidewalk components that were measured during the inventory.

Table 5. Sidewalk Components Measured During Inventory for Compliance Evaluation

Component ADA Requirement Sidewalk Sidewalk Width 48 inches minimum Grade Not to exceed the grade of the adjacennt road Cross Slope 2.0% maximum with exception from R302.6.1 No discontinuities greater than half an inch vertical or horizontal. Vertical surface discontinuities between 0.25 in and 0.5 in shall be Discontinuities beveled with a slope not ssteeper than 50%. No objects, including but not limited to poles, signs, vegetation, street furniture and driveeways that restrict to width or compliant Obstructions walking space to less than 48 inches Surface Must be stable, firm, and slip resistant

December 2012 19

Final Report

Sidewalk Summary Of the 2,872 sidewalk segments inventoried throughout the LCVMPO, there were 849 locations that did not have sidewalk or a pedestrian pathway, 1,754 locations that were noncompliant and 269 locations that were compliant with all ADA requirements reviewed.

The distribution for sidewalk compliance among the member agencies is shown in Figure 2.

Number of Sidewalk Segments by Member Agency

988 1000

900

800

700 599 600 Compliant 455 Noncompliant 500 No Sidewalk 400 274 300 155 200 102 65 78 100 32 42 32 50

0 City of Asotin Asotin City of City of County Clarkston Lewiston

Figure 2. Number of Sidewalk Segments by Member Agency

Locations that had a sidewalk or a pedestrian path were reviewed to determine what components appeared to have the most compliance issues. The most common problems for sidewalk segments within the LCVMPO include:  Narrow sidewalk width  Steep cross slope  Steep grade  Surface discontinuities present  Obstructions that narrow the width of the pedestrian path

Table 6 shows the number of sidewalk segments with the deficiencies listed above for each member agency. It also shows the percentage of sidewalk segments with the deficiency.

December 2012 20

Final Report

Table 6. Common Noncompliant Sidewalk Components Noncompliant Sidewalk Component Sidewalk Discontinuities Obstructions Width Cross Slope Grade Present Present 8 29 10 44 45 City of Asotin 8.2% 29.9% 10.3% 45.4% 46.4% 1 86 8 58 82 Asotin County 0.7% 64.2% 6.0% 43.3% 61.2% 38 471 27 487 528 City of Clarkston 5.9% 72.6% 4.2% 75.0% 81.4% 33 598 63 819 731 City of Lewiston 2.9% 52.3% 5.5% 71.7% 64.0% 80 1184 108 1408 1386 LCVMPO Total 4.0% 58.5% 5.3% 69.6% 68.5%

Transit Stops Transit Stop components related to ADA compliance were measured and examined during the field inventory. Determinations were made in the field about which components were compliant or noncompliant, using the technical requirements listed in the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Table 7 shows the components that were measured during the inventory.

Table 7. Transit Stop Components Measured During Inventory for Compliance Evaluation

Component ADA Requirement Transit stop Length 8 ft. minimum Depth 5 ft. minimum Cross Slope 2.0% maximum with exception from R302.6.1 Surface Must be firm, stable and slip resistant The grade of the boarding and alighting area parallel to curb is the Parallel Grade same and the street grade The grade of the boarding and alighting area perpendicular to the Perpendicular Grade curb is 2.0% or less. No discontinuities greater than half an inch vertical or horizontal. Vertical surface discontinuities between 0.25 in and 0.5 in shall be Discontinuities beveled with a slope not steeper than 50%.

There must be a connection between the boarding and alighting

Connection area and the surrounding sidewalk and it must comply with the

requirements for a pedestrian access route (R302).

Maximum Slope 2.0% maximum Shelter If present, must comply with R308.2

December 2012 21

Final Report

Transit Stop Summary Of the 57 transit stops inventoried throughout the LCVMPO, there were 54 locations that were noncompliant and 3 locations that were compliant with all ADA requirements reviewed.

The distribution for transit stop compliance among the transit agencies and member agencies is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

Number of Transit Stops by Transit Agency

29 30 25 25

20 Compliant Noncompliant 15

10 3 5 0 0 Lewiston Transit PTBA

Figure 3. Number of Transit Stops by Transit Agency

Number of Transit Stops by Member Agency

30 27

25 23

20 Compliant 15 Noncompliant

5 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 City of Asotin City of City of Asotin County Clarkston Lewiston

Figure 4. Number of Transit Stops by Member Agency

December 2012 22

Final Report

Transit Stop locations were reviewed to determine what components appeared to have the most compliance issues. The most common problems for transit stops within the LCVMPO include:  Surface discontinuities present  Noncompliant dimensions (Most commonly the 8’ depth requirement was not met.)  Noncompliant connection between the transit stop and sidewalk or pedestrian path  Steep parallel grade  Steep perpendicular grade

Table 8 shows the number of transit stops with the deficiencies listed above for each member agency. It also shows the percentage of sidewalk segments with the deficiency.

Table 8. Common Noncompliant Transit Stop Components Noncompliant Transit Stop Component Discontinuities Parallel Perpendicular Present Dimensions Connection Grade Grade 0 1 0 0 0 City of Asotin 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 1 1 0 2 Asotin County 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 4 9 1 1 20 City of Clarkston 16.7% 37.5% 4.2% 4.2% 83.3% 8 12 5 2 19 City of Lewiston 29.6% 44.4% 18.5% 7.4% 70.4% 12 23 7 3 41 LCVMPO Total 21.1% 40.4% 12.3% 5.3% 71.9%

Prioritization Criteria Recommendations

Development of prioritization criteria is essential to achieving ADA compliance in the public right-of- way. In addition, the prioritization of noncompliant locations allows agencies to make the most effective use of future funding. Most public agencies use a location based system, a compliance based system, or a combination of both systems. In a location based system, curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops are prioritized based on where they are located relative to locations with higher pedestrian demand. Pedestrian facilities located in areas of high pedestrian use, such as downtown, would be higher priority and features located in areas of low pedestrian use would be lower priority. In a compliance based system, curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops are prioritized based on how compliant they are. The most noncompliant facilities would be highest priority. A combination of these two systems provides the most comprehensive prioritization method.

December 2012 23

Final Report

It is recommended that the member agencies within the MPO adopt a prioritization method that takes into consideration both the current compliance and location of a curb ramp, sidewalk or transit stop. Pedestrian facilities that are missing should have the highest priority followed by those that are most out of compliance. Also, facilities that are in locations that have a higher pedestrian demand should have a higher priority than those that are used less frequently. Citizen requests and complaints need to be evaluated and incorporated into the prioritization process.

Location Based Prioritization Criteria The ADA (28 CFR 35.150 (d) (2)) states that priority should be given to ramps near state and local government offices and facilities, transportation facilities, places of public accommodation, and employers. These are locations that would receive higher pedestrian use or demand.  Government offices and facilities include post offices, city halls, courthouses, police departments, fire stations, and libraries.  Transportation facilities include bus stops, shuttle stops, train stations and airports. Fixed stop locations were obtained from several transit agencies throughout the state.  Places of public accommodation included hospitals and medical clinics, nursing homes, schools, amusement parks, fairgrounds, museums, senior centers, and community centers.  Employers include industrial, manufacturing, and commercial. A list compiled by the Idaho Department of Labor of the top 50 private employers in the state was used to identify major employment locations.

A dataset of public access locations was created as part of the Public ADA Facilities Inventory project. The LCVMPO member agencies can compare the curb ramp, sidewalk and transit stop datasets to the public facilities dataset using spatial analysis, and develop a scoring or ranking system. More public locations in the vicinity of a curb ramp or other feature would indicate a higher demand and would receive a higher priority.

The types of public access locations could be ranked according to the order given in the ADA, be ranked based on ratings from public involvement efforts, or some other method. A survey given at the open house meetings and online asked for input regarding how public access locations should be ranked, but no comments were received.

Compliance Based Prioritization Criteria Compliance ratings are based on a quantitative analysis of compliance. Locations with no curb ramp and where sidewalk or a pedestrian path exists are the highest priority, followed by existing ramps that are the most out of compliance.

During the compliance analysis of inventoried data, each curb ramp, sidewalk segment and transit stop was evaluated based on the number of components out of compliance; one point was given for each component out of compliance. The components reviewed for curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops are located in Table 3, Table 5 and Table 7. If there was no curb ramp or sidewalk at a location, all

December 2012 24

Final Report

components were considered out of compliance and therefore that location received a point for each component out of compliance and would be included in the high priority category.

Composite Score Each agency will have the opportunity to select how they want to use the location/demand and compliance analyses to develop a composite score. The composite score can be used to rank curb ramps, sidewalk segments and transit stops into high, medium and low priorities for a future ADA Transition Plan and future ADA improvement projects.

Public Requests In addition to the analysis methods above, a public request or complaint process should be set up by each member agency to handle ADA compliance issues that are brought up by the public. Because it can be difficult to determine the usage of particular curb ramps or sidewalk segments by people with disabilities or the importance of specific locations to these individuals, input from people with disabilities, representative organizations, and concerned citizens should be taken into consideration during prioritization. Citizen requests and complaints need to be evaluated and appropriate action taken.

Next Steps for Member Agencies

Each agency within the MPO will use the inventory data and public input from this report to develop an agency specific prioritization method for ramps and sidewalks in their public right-of-way. Agencies will also create a Transition Plan for pedestrian facilities within the public ROW, which will outline barriers to accessibility in the public right-of-way, methods for achieving compliance, and a schedule for future improvements. These plans will be used to identify which improvements to make in a prioritized manner as funding becomes available.

Next steps for the individual member agencies include:  Designate an ADA Coordinator  Provide notice to the public about ADA requirements  Establish an ADA grievance procedure  Develop or update internal design standards, specifications and details  Develop prioritization criteria for curb ramps, sidewalks, and transit stops  Develop a Transition Plan for Pedestrian Facilities (correction program)  Approve a schedule and budget for the Transition Plan  Develop a method for updating inventory data and monitoring progress on the implementation of the Transition Plan

The ADA requires public entities with 50 or more employees to create a Transition Plan identifying how compliance will be achieved on all agency facilities. The Public ADA Facilities Inventory project data aids

December 2012 25

Final Report

in the development of a partial transition plan as it only looked at facilities within the public ROW. For a complete Transition Plan each member agency will need to include all agency owned buildings and facilities and evaluate them for ADA compliance.

The Transition Plan shall, at a minimum:  Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities  Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible  Specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance with this section and, if the time period of the transition plan is longer than one year, identify steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period  Indicate the official responsible for implementation of the plan.

The Transition Plan for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way shall be reviewed and updated annually to account for completed projects and include additional planned projects to address ADA requirements. The Transition Plan should also be on file and available for public Inspection and will be available in alternate formats if requested. The NCHRP report, ADA Transition Plans: A Guide to Best Management Practices (NCHRP Project Number 20-7 (232), 2009) is an excellent resource for developing a transition plan.

Funding Opportunities

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Map-21) was signed into law in July of 2012. MAP-21 has a new approach to core formula program funding, authorizing a lump sum total instead of individual authorizations for each program. Once each state's share of the total is calculated, it is divided up by program within the state. It is up to each state to determine how their funding is allocated. The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) and Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) have programs in place may be used to fund pedestrian facility improvement projects.

ITD may have funding available through the Cash for Towns program or the Safe Routes to School program (SR2S). The Cash for Towns program provides up to $50,000 per project and must be used on the state system. The Safe Routes to School program funds infrastructure projects in conjunction with school route safety programs up to $100,000.

WSDOT may have funding available through the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Funding program, SR2S program or Small City Sidewalk program. The SR2S program is to be used on projects within two miles of primary and middle schools. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety program funds improvements to enhance safety and mobility for people who choose to walk or bike. The Small City Sidewalk program funds projects to improve safety, access, connectivity and address system continuity. To be eligible for the Small City Sidewalk program, the intent of the project must be transportation and not recreation. The project must also be on or related to a Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Small City Arterial.

December 2012 26

Final Report

Contact information for each of the programs above is shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Funding Program Contacts

Agency Program Contact Phone Email ITD Cash For Towns Ken Helm 208-799-4223 [email protected] Shauna ITD Safe Routes to School DeMeritt 208-334-8533 [email protected] Pedestrian and Bicycle WSDOT Safety Program Ian Macek 360-705-7596 [email protected] Charlotte WSDOT Safe Routes to School Claybrooke 360-705-7302 [email protected] Small City Sidewalk WSDOT Program John Dorffeld 360-586-1147 [email protected]

References and Links

LCVMPO http://www.lewisclarkmpo.org/

Project Website http://www.lcvalleyada.com/

Americans with Disabilities Act, 28 CFR Part 35 http://www2.ed.gov/policy/rights/reg/ocr/28cfr35.pdf

PROWAC http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.pdf

US Access Board http://www.access-board.gov/

US Department of Justice http://www.ada.gov/

December 2012 27

Final Report

Appendix A - Standard Plan Review

Appendix A includes the standard plans that were submitted for an ADA compliance review as part of the Public ADA Facilities Inventory project. The comments in red were made by Lochner to show changes necessary to complying with the current requirements of the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way.

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Final Report

Appendix B - Public Involvement Materials

Appendix B includes the public involvement materials developed as part of the Public ADA Facilities Inventory project.

 Newsletter 1 - June 2012  Newsletter 2 - July 2012  Newsletter 3 - August 2012  Poster 1 - 11x17  Poster 2 - 8.5x11  Screenshot of Project Website  Press Release 1  Press Release 2  Lewiston Tribune Website Banner Advertisement of Open Houses  Lewiston Tribune Newspaper Advertisement  KLEW News Story  Lewiston Tribune Newspaper Story  Facebook Posts  Open House Displays  Open House Sign In Sheets  Comment Forms  Project Mailing List

41 June 2012

HOW CAN I GET BACKGROUND INVOLVED? It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis Clark Valley that all residents and visitors can easily move around the region, free of Providing the best possible obstruction. This effort is not limited to automobiles but also includes bicycles disability access is of the and pedestrians, and specifically individuals with disabilities. utmost importance to In compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA), The Lewis-Clark Valley the agencies of the Lewis Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which manages transportation Clark Valley. Data gathered planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and through the inventory will Asotin Counties, has initiated an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the paint half the picture of public right-of-way for compliance with ADA. where improvements are most needed. It is equally WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? important to learn from Pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way (ROW) primarily consist the public that uses these of sidewalks, curb ramps, and pedestrian paths and transit stops. Private facilities every day what properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the curb ramps and sidewalks MPO’s jurisdiction and have their own ADA compliance requirements. are particularly difficult or unsafe to navigate. Knowing HOW IS THE INVENTORY BEING CONDUCTED? what routes are most The MPO has hired a team of consultants from H.W. Lochner and J-U-B commonly used will also Engineers that will be canvassing the region this summer with the purpose of help guide the prioritization identifying, measuring and cataloging pedestrian facilities to determine their to ensure that sidewalks level of compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help determine and paths at the top of which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement, beginning a process of improvement prioritization for the local agencies the list are in areas where within the MPO. It is the goal of all the agencies to use this information to improvements will have the construct projects as budgets allow. most benefit. Please see the reverse side of this handout to learn more about the different way you can participate in this important project.

42 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

The Langdon Group, a regional public involvement company, will be managing public outreach throughout the project with the goal of engaging as many interested citizens as possible. Community members can get involved by: VISIT WWW.LCVALLEYADA.COM At www.LCValleyADA.com you will find more information about this project and have the opportunity to navigate through a map of the MPO to help identify where improvements are needed. Every two weeks the project team will update the map to indicate where visitors have identified areas for needed improvement.

ATTEND AN OPEN HOUSE At www.LCValleyADA.com, visitors have the opportunity to identify areas of concern on a map. All input received will Public meetings will be held in Lewiston and Clarkston during be uploaded to the map allowing visitors to view comments the day and evening, the week of July 23-27, 2012. This will be a received. great opportunity to learn more about the project, identify where improvements are need on a map, and discuss the project with agency and consultant staff. Additional information will be forthcoming as specific dates, times and locations are determined. CONTACT US SCHEDULE A PRESENTATION We want to hear from you If you are a member of a group that would be interested in learning more about this project, let us know and we will do our best to accommodate an informative presentation and group discussion. www.LCValleyADA.com SIGN UP TO RECEIVE MORE INFORMATION Sign-up to receive more information: As the project reaches milestones 208.746.9010 and public outreach opportunities become available, the project team wants to be sure all interested community members are notified in advance. At www.LCValleyADA.com you can sign up to receive email updates, or contact us via phone or mail. LCVMPO Public ADA Inventory c/o J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A SHARE THIS INFORMATION Lewiston, ID 83501 Share this information: We encourage all interested community members to talk about this effort with your friends, neighbors and co- workers, and guide them to the project website. The more input and comments we gather, the more reflective the results of the inventory will be of the community’s concerns.

After the inventory is complete, all MPO agencies encourage their communities to stay involved and continue providing input when warranted.

43 UPDATE: July 2012 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES: JULY 25 & 26, 2012 The project team wants to learn from the community what curb ramps and sidewalks in the Lewis-Clark Valley are in need of improvement and difficult to navigate, particularly for people with disabilities. Knowing what routes are most commonly used will also help guide the prioritization to ensure that sidewalks and paths at the top of the list are in areas where improvements will have the most benefit. Two public open houses are scheduled in Idaho and Washington: WEDNESDAY | July 25 | 4 - 7 pm Lewiston Community Center, 1424 Main Street, Lewiston

THURSDAY | July 26 | 11 am - 1 pm Asotin County Library, 417 Sycamore Street, Clarkston

The public is invited to stop by anytime within the Open House hours. Project team members will be on hand to answer questions and provide information. Maps and comment forms will be available to help identify where improvements are most needed and in determining criteria for curb ramp improvement prioritization.

CAN’T MAKE AN OPEN HOUSE? At www.LCValleyADA.com navigate through a map of the MPO to help identify where improvements are needed. Every two weeks the project team will update the map to indicate where visitors have identified areas for needed improvement.

As the project reaches milestones and public outreach opportunities become available, the project team wants to be sure all interested community members are notified in advance. At www.LCValleyADA.com At www.LCValleyADA.com, visitors have the opportunity to identify areas of concern on a map. All input received will you can sign up to receive email updates. be uploaded to the map allowing visitors to view comments received.

Project information on the reverse

44 PROJECT INFORMATION

It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis-Clark Valley that all residents and visitors can easily move around the region, free of obstruction. This is not limited to automobiles but also includes bicycles and pedestrians, and individuals with disabilities.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which manages transportation planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties, has initiated an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the public right- of-way. WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE INVENTORY? Pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way primarily consist of sidewalks, curb ramps, and pedestrian paths and transit stops. Private properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the MPO’s jurisdiction and have their own ADA compliance requirements. CONTACT US HOW IS THE INVENTORY BEING CONDUCTED? We want to hear from you The MPO has hired a team of consultants from H.W. Lochner and J-U-B Engineers who are canvassing the region to identify, measure and catalog pedestrian www.LCValleyADA.com facilities to determine compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help determine which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement. This begins a process of improvement 208.746.9010 prioritization for the local agencies within the MPO. The goal of all the agencies to use this information to construct projects as budgets allow. LCVMPO Public ADA Inventory c/o J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A The inventory began in May 2012 and is anticipated for Lewiston, ID 83501 substantial completion by late summer 2012.

45 UPDATE: August 2012

PUBLIC INVENTORY COMPLETE INVOLVEMENT More than 3,500 curb ramps, 2,800 sidewalks segments and 57 transit stops were measured and catalogued this spring and summer. Data collected will PRODUCED help determine which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement, beginning a process of improvement prioritization for the local VALUABLE INSIGHT agencies within the MPO. It is the goal of all the agencies to use this information to develop Transition Through an extensive Plans in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and public involvement process construct projects as budgets allow. Maps of the inventoried areas can be including a project website, viewed on the Public Involvement page of LCValleyADA.com. media coverage, two public open house meetings and BACKGROUND information distribution In compliance with ADA, the Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning through email, mail and Organization (MPO), which manages transportation planning for Lewiston, public postings, the project Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties, has team gathered valuable initiated an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way. input that will help guide the Pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way primarily consist of prioritization to ensure that sidewalks, curb ramps, and pedestrian paths and transit stops. Private sidewalks and paths at the top properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the of the list are in areas where MPO’s jurisdiction and have their own ADA compliance requirements. improvements will have the The MPO has hired a team of consultants from H.W. Lochner and J-U-B Engineers to identify, measure and catalog pedestrian facilities to determine most benefit. compliance with ADA requirements. This begins a process of improvement All MPO agencies encourage prioritization for the local agencies within the MPO. their communities to stay involved and continue providing NEXT STEPS input when warranted. Each agency within the MPO will use the inventory data and public input to Public Open House display develop an agency specific prioritization method for ramps and sidewalks in their public right-of-way. Agencies will also create a Transition Plan, which boards can be viewed at will outline barriers to accessibility in the public right-of-way, methods for LCValleyADA.com. achieving compliance, and a schedule for future improvements. These plans will be used to make the most needed improvements as funding becomes available.

46 ABOUT THE PROJECT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis Clark Providing the best possible disability access is of the utmost importance to the agencies of the Lewis Valley that all residents and visitors can easily move around the region, Clark Valley. Data gathered through the inventory will paint half the picture of where improvements are free of obstruction. This effort is not limited to automobiles but also most needed. It is equally important to learn from the public that uses these facilities every day what includes bicycles and pedestrians, and specifically individuals with curb ramps and sidewalks are particularly difficult or unsafe to navigate. Knowing what routes are most disabilities. commonly used will also help guide the prioritization to ensure that sidewalks and paths at the top of the list are in areas where improvements will have the most benefit. In compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA), The Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which manages transportation The Langdon Group, a regional public involvement company, will be managing public outreach throughout planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and the project with the goal of engaging as many interested citizens as possible. Community members can get involved by: Asotin Counties, has initiated an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way for compliance with ADA. VISIT WWW.LCVALLEYADA.COM

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? At www.LCValleyADA.com you will find more information about this project and have the opportunity to At www.LCValleyADA.com, visitors have the opportunity to navigate through a map of the MPO to help identify where improvements are needed. Every two weeks the identify areas of concern on a map. All input received will Pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way (ROW) primarily consist project team will update the map to indicate where visitors have identified areas for needed improvement. be uploaded to the map allowing visitors to view comments of sidewalks, curb ramps, and pedestrian paths and transit stops. Private received. properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the MPO’s jurisdiction and have their own ADA compliance requirements. ATTEND AN OPEN HOUSE Public meetings will be held in Lewiston and Clarkston during the day and evening, the week of July 23-27, 2012. This will be a great opportunity to learn more about the project, identify where improvements are need CONTACT US HOW IS THE INVENTORY BEING CONDUCTED? on a map, and discuss the project with agency and consultant staff. Additional information will be forthcoming as specific dates, times and locations are determined. We want to hear from you The MPO has hired a team of consultants from H.W. Lochner and J-U-B Engineers that will be canvassing the region this summer with the purpose of identifying, measuring and cataloging pedestrian facilities to determine their SCHEDULE A PRESENTATION level of compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help determine If you are a member of a group that would be interested in learning more about this project, let us know and we www.LCValleyADA.com which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement, will do our best to accommodate an informative presentation and group discussion. beginning a process of improvement prioritization for the local agencies within the MPO. It is the goal of all the agencies to use this information to SIGN UP TO RECEIVE MORE INFORMATION construct projects as budgets allow. 208.746.9010 Sign-up to receive more information: As the project reaches milestones and public outreach opportunities become available, the project team wants to be sure all interested community members are notified in advance. At www.LCValleyADA.com you can sign up to receive email updates, or contact us via phone or mail. LCVMPO Public ADA Inventory c/o J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. SHARE THIS INFORMATION 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A Lewiston, ID 83501 Share this information: We encourage all interested community members to talk about this effort with your friends, neighbors and co-workers, and guide them to the project website. The more input and comments we gather, the more reflective the results of the inventory will be of the community’s concerns.

After the inventory is complete, all MPO agencies encourage their communities to stay involved and continue providing input when warranted. 47 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES: JULY 25 & 26, 2012

WEDNESDAY | July 25 | 4 - 7 pm Lewiston Community Center, 1424 Main Street, Lewiston THURSDAY | July 26 | 11 am - 1 pm Asotin County Library, 417 Sycamore Street, Clarkston Two public Open Houses have been scheduled to learn from the community what curb ramps and sidewalks in the Lewis-Clark Valley are in need of improvement and difficult to navigate, particularly for people with disabilities. Knowing what routes are most commonly used will also help guide the prioritization to ensure that sidewalks and paths at the top of the list are in areas where improvements will have the most benefit. The public is invited to stop by anytime within the Open House hours. Project team members will be on hand to answer questions and provide information. Maps and comment forms will be available to help identify where improvements are most needed and in determining criteria for curb ramp improvement prioritization.

CAN’T MAKE AN OPEN HOUSE? CONTACT US At www.LCValleyADA.com navigate through a map of the MPO to help identify where improvements are We want to hear from you needed. Every two weeks the project team will update the map to indicate where visitors have identified areas for needed improvement. www.LCValleyADA.com As the project reaches milestones and public outreach opportunities become available, the project team wants to be sure all interested community members are notified 208.746.9010 in advance. At www.LCValleyADA.com you can sign up to receive email updates and learn more about this important project. LCVMPO Public ADA Inventory c/o J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A Lewiston, ID 83501

48 Project website www.LCValleyADA.com

49 June 14, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Bryant Kuechle (Kee-Klee), The Langdon Group 208-739-3048, [email protected]

Public ADA facilities inventory will help identify pedestrian improvements in Lewis-Clark Valley

Public can help determine where improvements are needed most at www.LCValleyADA.com

It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis-Clark Valley that all residents and visitors, including those with disabilities, can easily move around the region, free of obstruction. The Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Public Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Facilities Inventory will help determine where improvements to pedestrian facilities within the valley’s public right-of-way are most needed in compliance with the ADA.

“Our public sidewalks, curb ramps, pedestrian paths and transit stops need to be accessible to everyone, including those with disabilities,” said Matt Jensen, MPO Director.

Consultant staff will be canvassing the region this summer to identify, measure and catalog pedestrian facilities to determine compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help identify which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement, beginning a process of improvement prioritization for local agencies within the MPO. The agencies will use this information to construct improvement projects as budgets allow.

“Data gathered through the inventory will paint half the picture of where improvements are most needed,” said Jensen. “It is equally important to learn from the people who use these facilities every day what curb ramps and sidewalks are particularly difficult or unsafe to navigate. Knowing what routes are most commonly used will also help set priorities to ensure that sidewalks and paths at the top of the list are in areas where improvements will have the most benefit.”

The project website (www.LCValleyADA.com) provides visitors the opportunity to navigate through a map and identify where improvements are needed. The MPO manages transportation planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties.

Private properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the MPO’s jurisdiction and have separate ADA compliance requirements.

Later this summer, public open houses will be scheduled in Lewiston and Clarkston to provide citizens the opportunity to learn more about the project, identify needed improvements on a map, and discuss the project with staff. Additional information will be forthcoming as specific dates, times and locations are determined.

Anyone interested in received information about the project and public involvement opportunities can sign up for email updates at www.LCValleyADA.com or contact the project team at 208-736-9010, [email protected], or 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A; Lewiston, Idaho; 83501.

###

50 July 17, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Bryant Kuechle (Kee-Klee), The Langdon Group 208-739-3048, [email protected]

Public can help identify ADA improvements in Lewis-Clark Valley at July 25, 26 open houses

Community can get involved through online interactive map: www.LCValleyADA.com

Public participation at two open house meetings will help the communities of the Lewis-Clark Valley determine where improvements to pedestrian facilities within the valley’s public right-of-way are most needed in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

“Our public sidewalks, curb ramps, pedestrian paths and transit stops need to be accessible to everyone, including those with disabilities,” said Matt Jensen, Director of the Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO manages transportation planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties, and is overseeing the ADA Facilities Inventory.

Public open houses will be held:

 Wednesday, July 25 (4-7 pm): Lewiston Community Center, 1424 Main Street, Lewiston  Thursday, July 26 (11 am-1 pm): Asotin County Library, 417 Sycamore Street, Clarkston

Beginning in May, consultant staff has canvassed the region to identify, measure and catalog pedestrian facilities to determine compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help identify which facilities are in the greatest need of reconstruction or replacement, beginning a process of improvement prioritization for MPO cities and counties. The agencies will use this information to construct improvement projects as budgets allow.

In addition to the open houses, the project website (www.LCValleyADA.com) provides community members the opportunity to learn more about the project and provide input. On the site, visitors can navigate through a map and identify where improvements are needed.

Private properties, such as apartment complexes and businesses, are outside of the MPO’s jurisdiction and have separate ADA compliance requirements.

Anyone interested in receiving information about the project and public involvement opportunities can sign up for email updates at www.LCValleyADA.com or contact the project team at 208-736-9010, [email protected], or 1630 23rd Ave. #1101A; Lewiston, Idaho; 83501.

### 51 Lewiston Tribune Page Banner Advertisement of Open Houses

Lewiston Tribune Newspaper Advertisement - 7/22/12

53 KLEW News Story - 7/27/12

Lewiston Tribune Article - 7/24/12

55 Facebook Post on KLEW News Page - 6/18/12

56 Facebook Post on Lewiston Tribune Page - 6/18/12

Facebook Post on Lewiston Tribune Page - 7/23/12

57 Facebook Post on Lewiston Public Works Page

58 Lewis-Clark Valley MPO PUBLIC ADA Facilities Inventory Public Open House WELCOME

59 Background It is of primary importance to the cities and counties of the Lewis-Clark Valley that all residents and visitors can easily move around the region, free of obstruction. This is not limited to automobiles, but also includes bicycles and pedestrians, and individuals with disabilities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Lewis-Clark Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which manages transportation planning for Lewiston, Clarkston, Asotin and urbanized areas of Nez Perce and Asotin Counties, has initiated an inventory of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way.

How is the Inventory being conducted? The MPO has hired a team of consultants from H.W. Lochner and J-U-B Engineers who are canvassing the region to identify, measure and catalog pedestrian facilities to determine compliance with ADA requirements. Data collected will help determine which facilities are in need of reconstruction or replacement. This begins a process of improvement prioritization for the local agencies within the MPO. The goal of all the agencies is to use this information to develop agency specific Transition Plans as required in the ADA and construct projects as budgets allow.

The inventory began in May 2012 and is anticipated for substantial completion by late summer 2012.

60 How you can participate The purpose of this meeting is to help our team learn about the public ADA needs in the Lewis-Clark Valley from those who live, work and travel in the area. t Talk with project staff to learn more t Look at the project maps and identify areas of concern t Fill out a comment form and leave it in the comment box t Take a form home for yourself, friends, family or neighbors to complete t Email comments to [email protected] t Visit www.LCValleyADA.com and identify where improvements are needed on the interactive map Comments are always welcome, but must be received by August 9, 2012 to allow our team to review and incorporate comments within the project schedule. After the inventory is complete, all MPO agencies encourage their communities to stay involved and continue providing input when warranted.

61 Curb Ramp Features What is most important to you? t Ramp Width t Ramp Running Slope t Ramp Cross Slope t Flare Slopes t Landing Width and Depth t Maximum Landing Slope t Detectable Warning Type and Placement t Pedestrian Push-button Location

62 Curb Ramp Locations Where are improvements needed the most? ADA provides Near Government Offices guidance for City & County Offices | Post Offices | Libraries prioritization: “The transition plan shall include a Near Transportation Facilities schedule for providing curb ramps, giving Busses | Shuttles | Commuter Vans priority to walkways serving... State and local government Places of Public Accommodation offices and facilities, transportation, Schools | Hospitals | Museums places of public accommodation and employers, followed by Near Employers walkways serving other Major Businesses | Industrial Centers areas.”

63 Lewiston Inventoried area

Curb ramp present No curb ramp Sidewalk present No sidewalk MPO urbanized area

64 Clarkston & Asotin County Inventoried area

Curb ramp present No curb ramp Sidewalk present No sidewalk MPO urbanized area

65 Asotin City Inventoried area

Curb ramp present No curb ramp Sidewalk present No sidewalk MPO urbanized area

66 67 68 69 70 71 Mailing List First Name Last Name Affiliation Address City State Zip Robbi Barrutia State Independent Living Council 816 W Bannock Suite 202 Boise ID 83702 Roger Howard Living Independence Network Corporation 1878 West Overland Road Boise ID 83705

Sherry Greenup Aging and Long Term Care 744 5th St. Suite C Clarkston WA 99403 Sam Olson Clarkston Shelter 2499 19th Street Clarkston WA 99403 Margret Cole Preferred Care 1545 7th Ave Clarkston WA 99403 Brady O'Kelley Riverview 1842 Golfview Drive Clarkston WA 99403 Sharee Kromrei Sycamore Glen 1587 Sycamore Street Clarkston WA 99403 Suzzane Daly Sycamore Glen 1587 Sycamore Street Clarkston WA 99403 Peggy Adamek Evergreen Estates 1215 Evergreen Court Clarkston WA 99403 Donna Robinson Clarkston Care Center 1242 11th Street Clarkston WA 99403 Home Care Services 549 5th St Ste E Clarkston WA 399403 Katherine Spindler Katherine's Harmony House 1358 Sycamore Street Clarkston WA 99403 Vivian Forner Hugo Pautler Senior Center 549 5th St. #F Clarkston WA 99403 Asotin County Community Servcies 549 5th St. Suite A Clarkston WA 99403 Darcy Weisner Clarkston School District PO BOX 70 Clarkston WA 99403 Molly Curtiss Clarkston School District PO BOX 70 Clarkston WA 99403 Richard Goodwin Habitat for Humanity PO BOX 317 Clarkston WA 99403

Ray Rosch Executive Director 817 A 6th Street Clarkston WA 99403

Kim Gates PTBA 733 5th St. Clarkston WA 99403

Maryette Bender 1033 McCarroll Street Clarkston ID 99403

David Knittel Community Action Network - Area Agency on Aging 124 New 6th St. Lewiston ID 83501 Linda Vestal Guardian Angel Homes 2221 Vineyard Avenue Lewiston ID 83501 Joy Cook Joyce's Residential Care 615 Cedar Avenue Lewiston ID 83501 Casey Rail Joyce's Residential Care 615 Cedar Ave Lewiston ID 83501 Juniper Meadows 2975 Juniper Drive Lewiston ID 83501 Ron Stoffer Lewis-Clark Care Center 1633 10th Avenue Lewiston ID 83501 Mindy Shepard Royal Plaza Retirement and Care Center 2870 Juniper Drive Lewiston ID 83501 Connie Borgen Royal Plaza Retirement and Care Center 2870 Juniper Drive Lewiston ID 83501 Amy Knapp Unique Senior Care Assisted Living 1639 Birch Avenue Lewiston ID 83501 Becky Faller Wedgewood Terrace 2114 Vinyard Avenue Lewiston ID 83501 Jerry Bolin Wedgewood Terrace 2114 Vinyard Ave Lewiston ID 83501 Alternative Nursing Services 1827 8th St. Lewiston ID 83501 Lewiston Independent School District 3317 12th St. Lewiston ID 83501 Scott Douglas Idaho Dept. of Corrections 908 Idaho Street Lewiston ID 83501 Gary Grothe Idaho Dept. of Health and Welfare 1118 F Street, PO Drawer B Lewiston ID 83501 LeeLee Mendenhall Interlink 651 21st Ave. Lewiston ID 83501 Main Street Lighting 628 Main St. Lewiston ID 83501 Vocation Rehabilitation PO BOX 1164 Lewiston ID 83501 Mike Naccarato Lewiston Transportation Advisory Committee 2328 12th Ave. Lewiston ID 83501 Shane Hyde Idaho Commision for the Blind 1118 F Street Lewiston ID 83501 Lewiston Morning Tribune PO BOX 957 Lewiston ID 83051 KLEW PO BOX 615 Lewiston ID 83501 KATW/KVAB/KCLK 403 C Street Lewiston ID 83501 KOZE 2560 Snake River Ave. Lewiston ID 83501 KRLC/KMOK/KVTY 805 Stewart Ave. Lewiston ID 83501 Disability Action Center, Northwest 307 19th St. Suite A-1 Lewiston ID 83501 Mark Leeper Disability Action Center, Northwest 404 N Main St. Moscow ID 83843 Lois King Coalition of Responsible Disabled 612 N Maple Spokane WA 99201 Paul Gonseth WSDOT P.O. Box 12560 Yakima WA 98909

72 Final Report

Appendix C - Inventory Priorities

Appendix C shows the priority areas for the field inventory that were established during the initial stages of the Public ADA Facilities Inventory project. The following maps were used to determine the high priority areas for the inventory work and the order in which the inventory was to be completed.

Washington: Roadways highlighted in yellow are first priority. Roadways highlighted in orange are second priority.

Idaho: Downtown Lewiston is first priority. Roadways outside of downtown highlighted in pink are second priority and will be inventoried from NW to SE as funding allows.

73 74 CITY OF LEWISTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 inch = 3,333.33 feet µ

LEVEE BYP

D ST MILL RD

MAIN ST 9TH ST E MAIN ST

LAPWAI RD

MEMORIAL BRIDGE MEMORIAL

18TH ST

8TH ST

SNAKE RIVERAVE

21ST ST 16TH AVE

SOUTHWAY AVE 17TH ST LINDSAY CREEK RD THAIN GRADE

ON RAMP

GUN CLUB RD

BRYDEN CANYON RD

5TH ST

BRYDEN AVE ST10TH THAIN RD

SOUTHPORT AVE

RIPON AVE BARR ST

14TH ST 75 Final Report

Appendix D - Data Dictionaries

Appendix D includes the data dictionaries for the GPS units. The tables show what components were collected, the field types, and the ADA requirements associated with each component of curb ramps, sidewalks and transit stops.

76 ADA Ramp Inventory Data Dictionary Field Name Field Alias Field Type ADA Requirement Agency Agency Menu None - Inventory Information Route Route Text None - Inventory Information CrossSt Cross Street Text None - Inventory Information LocType Location Type Menu None - Inventory Information Corner Corner/Side Menu None - Inventory Information Photo Photo Text None - Inventory Information InvDate Inventory Date Date - Auto Entry None - Inventory Information

Location and Inventory InvBy Inventoried By Menu None - Inventory Information Compliant: Yes Ramp Ramp Yes/No Noncompliant: No RampType Ramp Type Menu None - Indirectly Related to Compliance, QC Check Ramp Width(s) Compliant: 48 Inches or Greater RampWidth Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Less than 48 Inches Running Slope(s) Compliant: 8.3% or Less Running Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 8.3% Ramp Cross Slope(s) Compliant: 2.0% or Less Cross Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 2.0% Flare Slope(s) Compliant: 10.0% or Less if in Pedestrian Path Flare Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 10.0% if in Pedestrian Path Surface Compliant: No Discont Discontinuities Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Yes Compliant: Yes Landing Landing Provided Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: No Landing 4'x4' Compliant: Yes Landing4x4 Minimum Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: No Landing Maximum Slope Compliant: 2.0% or Less MaxSlope Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 2.0% Truncated Domes Compliant: Yes TrunDomes Present Yes/No Noncompliant: No

DW Detectable Warning DWCompliant Compliant Yes, No or N/A Complaint with R304 Lip Greater Than Half Compliant: No HalfinLip an Inch Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Yes Gutter Counter Compliant: 5.0% or Less GutterSl Slope(s) Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 5.0% Flowline Slope(s) Compliant: 2.0% or Less FlowlineSl Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 2.0% Transition MarkCross Marked Crosswalk Yes/No None - Indirectly Related to Compliance Clear Space Within Compliant: Yes ClearSpace Crosswalk Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: No

Pushbutton Ped Signal Pushbutton Yes/No None - Indirectly Related to Compliance Compliant: Yes Ped Sig PushBComp Pushbutton Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: No RComments Ramp Comments Text None - Comments

77 Sidewalk Inventory Data Dictionary Field Name Field Alias Field Type ADA Requirement Agency Agency Menu None - Inventory Information Route Route Name Text None - Inventory Information Side Side Menu None - Inventory Information Photo Photo Text None - Inventory Information InvDate Inventory Date Date - Auto Entry None - Inventory Information InvBy Inventoried By Menu None - Inventory Information Compliant: Yes Sidewalk Sidewalk Yes/No Noncompliant: No SWMaterial Sidewalk Material Menu None - Inventory Information Sidewalk Width Compliant: 48 Inches or greater SWWidth Compliant Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Less than 48 inches Compliant: 2.0% or Less SteepCross Steep Cross Slope Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Greater than 2.0% Compliant: Same as roadway grade SteepGrade Steep Grade Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Steeper than roadway grade Surface Compliant: No Discont Discontinuities Yes, No or N/A Noncompliant: Yes Checkboxes for: Mailboxes Driveways Fire Hydrants Poles Signs Vegetation Street Furniture Manholes Obstruct Obstructions Other Other Text

Comments Sidewalk Comments Text None - Comments

78 Transit Stop Inventory Data Dictionary Field Name Field Alias Field Type ADA Requirement TransitCo Transit Company Menu None - Inventory Information StopName Stop Name Text None - Inventory Information Side Side Menu None - Inventory Information Photo Photo Number Text None - Inventory Information InvDate Inventory Date Date - Auto Entry None - Inventory Information InvBy Inventoried By Menu None - Inventory Information Clear Length of 8 ft, measured perpendicular to curb and clear width Dim8x5 Dimensions 8x5 Yes/No of 5 ft min, measured parallel to curb. (R410.1.2) Length Length Numeric Compliant: 8 ft or greater Depth Depth Numeric Compliant: 5 ft or greater Surface Surface Compliant Yes/No Surface firm, stable, and slip resistant. (R410.1.1) Parallel Grade ParGrade Compliant Yes/No Compliant: Same as street grade

PerpGrade Perpendicular Grade Numeric Compliant: 2.0% or less Surface Compliant: No Discont Discontinuities Yes or No Noncompliant: Yes Boarding area shall be connected to streets sidewalks or ped path by Connection Connection Compliant Yes/No a pedestrian access route complying with R301. (R410.1.3) Shelter Shelter Present Yes/No

Bus shelters shall provide a minimum clear space complying with R402 entirely within the shelter. Bus shelters shall be connected by ShelterCom Shelter Compliant Yes/No pedestrian access route complying with R301 to the boarding area. Comments Comments Text None - Comments

79 Final Report

Appendix E - Inventory Data Maps

Appendix E includes maps of the final inventory data for the City of Asotin, Asotin County, the City of Clarkston, and the City of Lewiston.

80 R e d W Port Way

o 9

lf t C h ro S

s Port Dr t s in g (S Fair St R Fair St 6 2) 1 t US1 h ( 2 Bridge 8 tate ) S Inters

t Bridge St (US12) R

5 t v plar S t Po i

h e

B r

4 1 d

St 2 l e St t l v 6 ap M l h n U S d S t a

h d 12 1 t n t Ash S S

1 o 3

St S g t 4 t a h t t i

S 1 St h Elm 1 D B

St 7 R

1 7 2 8

t e 1 t t Golfv h t ie h w h h Dr 1 a t

St h

1 2 ch

St St St 1 0 9

St r 9 e 6th S v t

t e h h i

e t nut St t B Ches Dr St

St w U

1 t Chestnut St e

i n

5 n B b Park St

t j e v l h a

e 1 r F M t neland m Adams S t i St r 6

y r

c s

V t a 4 S i rch 5 t Bi

i h C D B

n t t t

h t y h S o y c S a s r Ea S

i s r S S S t s t r

t o t t o ls Dr Libby St S il l H n 3 ling l l t Ro

S r

V S d

St ak St O a t t d n S da L l h Lin l t R e t

Way y 6 on m ingt Florence Ln V a em R i D nd Ave r e Highla lain Ct u Chamber g w s n M t I L a D a o rily n lo n r L W L mp t n a p -W Ra p F C y Sceni NS am le n c Way -E R sh o S ma d t And N ve n Ly reas n 16th A W r S Foster L en D a D d y r r e 3 F Rd r d hnson 2 o i Ben Jo 2nd Ave r s t rs P D L Ryegate t e Ln o n v D S e i

w n e R h e t Pound Ln e

re 0 D r

a e 2 R v P Ave r A 3rd h i 8th o d 1

S C Rd g H i n h W e i al s l k te L e v l n n i y l e a a l D e w

v S 2 r t y 0 d r 1 th E h D Av

9 L e

4th Ave a r

J t

n d u h r

a o n H

harnita Dr S C o i k et Ct Dr l Suns t l e

w v s c t A t r 21s o

s e

n s e e v t A inda Vista D l W d L W l n r 2 26 5th Ave H a 2 Hi y

r n ig t i S h h

D k

u l l n i S

l r 1 n

d n a fer D e e t R 9t c R chae

s Dr S r r h

oir e t

v u e 24 r s v S A th Av

e 2 S B h e t t th Ave 6 6 t 1 0 es D 6th Ave h e Po 8 Av t th R t 7 C

h r s t

t 7

h t n ri L 2 1

S L S

y n t S b 2 ch t o

h T n

t t

d 5 f

e 2 S

t t n

e 8th Av L d R e 10th Av y R d 2 r

H th S th r r i 1 7 o a s 9th Ave

2 v r l lg t Pe e S 9th Ave s 10th Ave r

e e R t n

12th Ave D r 2 4 Scenic Hills Dr th S t D Ch o n uk v L ar L e e n D p r o Sl r r h D wood D H t uail u Q eim o e ark

S g Ct

ri l

i M t a

a s C t e u r t s D

s Q r e r N D

s s u w a o l l l k a c w Ni d S R e iv s r n r t D a s D e r m c n er r e iv o R b Cl s t Legend O rry S Greco Che Dr Ramp No

Ma Yes rshal Ct River Canyon S Dr k y

l Sidewalk i n

No r Yes TransitCo Lewiston Transit PTBA

t t 1st S t t r S e

r S D S o 2 r Alley n nd St e t m ol on s and l l i c

i St

W e e n F Kin 3rd St i gs

Ln g m er L f i

u ev f l R in a l s

e id d o

B r St ge J 4th

n a

v S ie H w t n D r L r yde Sn R ive S r R n idg a e D k r e d R R d i reek an R v Asotin County, CityC of Asotinorg e in M r sot R A d

& City of Clarkston 9 12 ± SR 81

D 82 V

D L

R B

K S N R A L

W C A R

S E A

E ST

D R 3

2 O H

N P P L L

IL KNOL D D T A S D N 2

QU 2

E R

No Yes No Yes Lewiston Transit PTBA

T S

ND 2 D 2

E D R WHEATLANDS AV

E R

V Lewiston

A K

D A

R ST

ST 1 9 2 H

Legend Ramp Sidewalk TransitCo

D A

C Y

L R

Y N I

A R

I L

B U

W D

Y Q

R L R

H A

H N E

F D

G A

I P

I T S H H T 0 R E 2 R H M

P D R M

B S N DG D I A

U R I R T

R T O D IT

H C

R N

P N

IG A L

B O T

S GA H N 19T

W C

O L OU I

T L

POWERS DR B C Y

P A

R E L TI D V

I HE

P L

A A

W T A T S

H T 8 1 S

E City of Lewiston ARR

A B

T R

S V A

E H A

7T V

1 N

O T S C H T 7 L 1

L CEDAR DR

D BURRELL DR BURRELL

R R

V C T S H T 6 ± 1

S H H H T 6 1 C T S H H T 6 1 R

E T S H T 5 1 E

T S H H T 5 E 1

A DR

N R R R A

D E

P D E DE

V T S

H T 5 P 1

I E

Y L

V D A

R R A

K DR BURRELL E I T S

TH Y 4 E E 1

E A

C T S

H T 4 R 1

A C RN

Y A

R T S

H T 4 A 1

E S W D N D

I L

T S H H T 3 1

D T S H H T 3 1

13TH ST 13TH T S H H T 3 1

TAMMANY CREEK RD TAMMANY F

T S H H T 2 1

T S H H T 3 1

V C

T S H H T 2

1 A

T S

H H T 2 1 T S H H T 2

L 1 E ON L

V P I

VE A

M R

D A

T N S H T 1

R 1 C T S H T 1

1 K R O N R

I N

D S

A L

O P H

D T S H H T 1 T 1 K

E L Y

R W E

V E

A V

EM E

T S

H T 0 1 H

E O

N H

K V I

M C LN E

L A

R U E

D R

A B

U L

C A N N E

U G H N S S T

H T 0 ST 1

IN P

N L

D T

E N R P Y C E E

T S

H AI 9T Y L

M V R

A E

E B S

DR DG

TA R

V E T S

E H T 9 R

E O

T N

S L

AV I

Y H

F S

H T 8

F T T V S H H

T T

T 8

P E

O S H

8T N D R

E R T C S

IL D 8

A A

E S

R A

T RE 8

O T

S V H 30T C

T S

M H T E 8 E

R P A G

NI V M

T S E

H T 9 2

IL R A

N R U A

S H A T T J 8

E E D L

R S T L

E E

A A E T

2 H 7 T

R W

N T S

H R T 6

2 R T R N E E

N D

A U R V V

E PER

E V

E T

T B

VE A

N E E D

T A S

H T A V 7

T S

L 24T D

E S A E

A N

H E

A C EZ H S

A V R A R

A E

E N N T

T T

EN LE

I G

T D A N

N T

T V 7

V L TO R Y

5 N D

D A T S H H T N 6 I S

1 A

S H A

I A L E T S A A

2 YD

SU E

1 M T H L S

R E

R H

H T R W

RDA H 9 V

E T T R T

T S

T S 1 G

3 2 B

E D D E A 6 D IR

T 8 S H H T 6 R

TE V

V R

1 A

T R S L

H T

2 AY

A S

N T S T

H H K T B 0

2 U

N E Z P E R C

E 4 G

R W A D H E E E B

T TH

V E

V CT N N

R A G

2 N

T 3

S A

N TH

8 R 1

1 1 B

T S H T T S 5 H H T 8 1 E

H A

E C

T V

E V E

T S T

TH H 5 8 E Y T S H H T 7 1 R A

S A

V N

S A

E E

V E

9 A H

A E N A P

E T T S

S H T H H 6 V V T 4

I G 1 1 V T

T A

TH V

A A

H M

A 5

D T

S H 4

5 T A

S D TH

T C

S H 4 A T T S

T H 2 T 5 1 1 M M H H 1

E H

T T A

2 2

11 T

T T T S

7 0 H T

1 2 A 4

T T

H D 4T

S 1

N 2

2 R OL

T S

H H

13T R C V

D N I

L AV

T N

N O

1 2 T H

S T

H I

E L Y

TH Y

R N

2 K T S

H T 1 8 1 T

S A AV D

ST 1 1

S C

T E

D T S H H T 0 1 T S

H 10T N

S A N

R E

F A

A D T

S H AHO 9T 1 T

S H H T 9 T T

S H

D T 9T Y Y D

I S

R R E

ST E T S H T 8 1 B

R V N TH E

9 2

E I

E O A

T S V H

7 V

R N D

R R V I AV A F T Y A A

E M N AV E Y

R E Y T S O H P T V W E 6 V K H

V A H C

R O E

A M

A A

TH O P A T

A P

V AV 7 W

E H P 5

ST H

1 H R

T 2

AV E E

T T N

TH E

2 U

S O 5 U T S H H T EY 4

A E A

T H 2 1 E

H V O

T 2

S 5

E D

S S T

S A D R T T 3 A

D ND

T E E

S V A

T C ND E 2 2 P S O R

1 P

T S

BEAC 1

4 R D L L O R A C T

S T S 1 P 13

Y A W

F S

P AM R

O L A K E V I E W

O R

L L

O O LN

E H

R S

DR D

B B

U L

Y Y

A Y

R U

O R

D A R

E F

R R

E R

T E

I E

E D

V L

K E EW I

H T G U A

G N

D A

R S

A R

R T

NY P

TE A

A TAMM G EK RD

Y CRE

LLS AN

E TAMM H

A LOOP E N 7TH AV

R e d W Port Way

o 9

lf t C h

ro S

L s Port Dr t ITAL ST s E CAP in C V g D ST T o E ( n S S f lu E R r St 6 e H Fai n 1 t B T 2 h ce Y 8 8 W AVE S 1ST ) a P F MA t y S IN R Bridge St (US12) 2ND AVE T ST

v e E IDA V 6 r D A H 5 3R O v t T S plar S t Po i T

h e H 3

E w TH AV r 4

d 5 S

4 E

B T

T t t S 1 V E h H AV 2 5T l t S H e S 9 l v 6 ap M t A l n

U S P T d S t a S VE h d TH A 1 1 t n 6 S R sh H t 2 A R 1 1

o 8 3 T

7 S S E g 0 4 O

TH t S a T h t t T t i V

S S 1 St h I T Elm 1 H D B H

S 7 R

1 7 PEC 2 8 R

S S e t

t 1 S t t h t Golfv S ie h w t h h 1 D a T r E t T T

h S T

1 2 c

S K S S t

h 1 0 9 T r S 9

t A e 6 t t v t

t 3 e t h A h i h N VE

e H A TH T R 10 t t nut S V t B Ches Dr S S 4 S S w

U 6

L D E 1 t e ut S T t hestn t C t

i n AVE 5 n TH B 11 b Park St H S and i t j e v l h a

v T E e V S A 1 r F M t 12TH m ms S nel Ada d t i S r 6

y r T

c s V t a VE S i rch 5 A t Bi 3TH t 1 n t i h C D B

n t t h

t y h S o y c S a VE s r H A Ea S 14T

i s r S S t s t VE r TH A t 14 t

t o t o ls Dr Libby St S 3 N ST il l H n g l AVE

in r 15TH l t l t Ro d S

V S S

ak St O t a S VE t H A d n 16T E da L l h AV t 9 Lin l t Y R e A

W T

6 1 H Way y UT on S O H m t S ming Florence Ln V 17TH AVE T a e R i D Ave nd S r e Highla erlain Ct u Chamb S g w s 18TH AVE T

n M t T I L a D a o ril n lo yn r 19TH AVE L W L amp p t n ay p S-W R m Fl C E Scenic Way N Ra es n 20TH AV S-E hm do 1ST AVE t N a y 2 L V

A n R n Ave r 2 S dre 16th W

a r Ln I te D s os N e F a N n y D d Dr

D r L e P AVE E 3 F 22ND

6 Y

d O Rd r M nson 2 o i S h T

Jo ve r s A n s R

d A A Be 2n 7 t r T P H R D T

L A R Ryegate t e Ln o n

v H D

S e D S i C w

N n T e A R ST h e

t Pound Ln O e V

re 0 D r

a e E 2 R v P Ave r A 3rd h ANYON RD h YDEN C R d i 8t BR o d 1

S C H R g D i

n h W e i al s l k Y te L e v l n O n i y E l e a l a F D e w L

S r v 2 I t F y 0 d r 1 th

E h D A A

C v 9 L e R

th Ave a r R 4 B

J t

n d u h A r D

a o n H M

harnita Dr S K C o i k t Ct D l e R P Suns t l e

w v s c t A

t A r r 21s o

s e L

n s e e v t A

inda Vista D l W d OW L W il n r 2 D 2 5th Ave H a 2 H A 6 y

r n ig E t i S h h

D k M

u l l n i S l n Dr d n a er f S R e e e t R a c R ch s S r E D D

i r r

o e

L t r v u e 2 r 1 s v 4 B A th Av W

e 2 S B h e t 9 t Ave 6 s th U 6 1 0 D A e t h P R Ave L 6th h e 8 Av t th t 7 o R Y C h r

s D t t

7 C

S h t

n r

L D 2 1 S L

y A

t n Y t S b 2 c t o R O

h T G n R t t h C

d T N 5 f O I i N e 2 N S N R l

d U t t n O Y

ve R

8th A L S R O

S d e R 10th Av y d C h R 2 D r

H t r r i 1 7 o a N s 9th Ave

2 v r l L lg t Pe

D L 9th Ave e S Ave s 10th A r R V

e e t

L R E K n

B E

V 2th Ave N E 1 I r I

A E

2 R W 4 TH Dr t s U Scenic Hill h D R S D R R t D D D C n L o hu R L ka R v r L Ln D I e e E

D p T H o Y r l A A T

S r W O r W

h D D

wood H E t l ai O Qu e R u im I o e ar G F THPORT AVE

k A OU g S S C D

t I F d

ri R l

i M t a

a s C t e u r t s D

s Q r e r N D

s s u w a o l l l k a ic w N d S R Legend e s iv T r n D r D A t a s D R M e r m M

c n E r r e Ramp Compliance e l iv o T A C

R b A N s

G Y P Compliant O St

ry Gr e S P her co Dr O

C L T

L L

S Noncompliant E AGE A B H RUS H LN No Ramp

C TAM MA Sidewalk Compliance M L NY CRE a O EK rshal Ct RD Rive O r Can S yon P Compliant Dr k y

l i n

e Noncompliant D

r No Sidewalk Transit Stop Compliance

I Compliant V E

Noncompliant R O

t t 1st S t t

S e r S

r D S d o 2 r Alley n nd St

e n t t m ol on s a l l i c

i S

W e e n F Kin 3rd St i gs

Ln g m v er

L f

i n

u e f l R i a l s

e i d d o C

B r St g J 4th n

e a v S ie H w t n D r L r yde Sn R ive S r R n idg a e D k r e d R R d i reek an R v Asotin County, CityC of Asotinorg e M r in sot R A d

& City of Clarkston 9 12 ± R S 83

D 84 V

D L

R B

K S N R A L

W C A R

P S E

A A

E T S

D R 3

2 O H

N P P L L

IL KNOL D D

T S A D N 2

QU 2 E

Compliant No Ramp Noncompliant Compliant No Sidewalk Noncompliant Compliant Noncompliant R

T S

D N 2 D 2

I Lewiston E D R WHEATLANDS AV

E R

A K

Legend D Compliance Ramp Compliance Sidewalk Stop Compliance Transit

T R S

T S 1 9 2 H

D A

C Y

L R

Y N I

A R

I L

B U

W D

± Y

Y Q

R L R

H A

H N E

F D

I P

I T S H H T 0 R E 2 R H M

P D R M

B S N DG D

I A

U R I R T

R T T O D I

H C

R N

P N

IG A A L

B O T

S H G T 9 N 1

W C

U M

O L O I

T L

POWERS DR B C Y

P A

R E L TI D V

I HE

P L

City of Lewiston A

W T A T S

H T 8 1 S

V E ARR

A B

T R

S V A

E H A

7T V

1 N

O T S C H T 7 L 1

L CEDAR DR ±

D BURRELL DR BURRELL

R R

V L C

T S

H T 6 1 A

T S

H H T 6 1 C T S

H T 6 1 R

V R

T S

H T 5 1 E

T S H H T 5 E 1

A D

N R R A

D E

P D E D

V T S

H T 5 P 1

I E

Y L

V D A

R R A

K DR BURRELL E I T S

TH Y 4 E E 1

E A

C T S

H T 4 R 1

A C RN

Y A

R T S

H T 4 A 1

E S W D N D

I L

T S H H T 3 1

D T S H H T 3 1

13TH ST 13TH T S H H T 3 1

TAMMANY CREEK RD TAMMANY F

T S

H T 2 1

T S H H T 3 1

V C

T S

H T 2

1 A

T S

H T 2 1 T S H H T 2

L 1 E ON L E

V P I

V A

M R

D A

T N S H

T 1 R 1 C

T S H T 1

K R O N R

I N

D S

A D L

O P H

D T S H H T 1 T 1 K

E L Y

R W E

V E

A V O

E E

T S

H T 0 1 H

E O

N H

K V N I

M C L E

L A

R U E

D R

A T B U

L C

A N E

U G H N S N S T

H T 0 S 1

I P

N L

D I T

E N R P Y C E E

T S

H T A 9 Y L

M V R

A E

E B R G S

D D

TA R

V E T S

E H T

9 R

E O

V I

T N

S L

A I

Y H

F S

H T 8

F T S T V

T T

T 8

P E

O S H T 8 N D R

R T C S

H T

L 8

I D E

A A

E S

R A

T R 8

O T

S V H T 0 3 C

T S

M H T E 8 E

R P

A I G

V M

L N

T S E

H N T 9 2

I R A

R U A

S H A T T J 8

E E D L

R S

T L

A A E T

2 H 7 T

S C

R W

N R T S

H R T 6 2

R T R N E

E E D

A U E R V V

E P

E V

E T

T B

V A

N E E D

E V

T A S

H T A V 7

T S

H T 4

L 2 Z D

E S A E

A A N H

C E E H S

A V R A R

A E

E N N T

V O

E L

I G

T D A N

N T

T V 7 D

V A L T R Y

5 N D

D T A

S H T N 6 I S

1 A

S H A

I A

L E T S A A

2 Y

SU E

M S 1 T H L

R E

R H

H T R W

R H 9 V

E T D T R T

T S

1 G

3 2 B

R E D E A 6 D I

T S

8 H T 6 R

V Y V R

1 A

T R S L

H T

2 A

A S

N T S T

H H K T B 0

2 U

N E Z

P E R C

4 G

R W A D H E E E B

T TH R

V E

CT N

R A G

2 N

T 3

S A

N TH

8 R 1

1 1 B

T S

H T T S 5 H H T 8 1 E

H A

E C

T V

E V E

T S T

TH H 5 8 E Y T S H H T 7 1 R A

S A

N V

S A

E E

V E

9 A H

A E H N A P

E T T S

S H T H 6 V V T 4 G 1

I A 1 V T

T V

A A

H M

A 5 A

D T

S H 4

5 T

S D A TH

T C

S H 4 T T S

T H 2 T 5 1 1 M M H H 1

E H

T T A

2 2

11 T

T T T S

7 0 H T

1 2 A 4

T T

H D T 4

S 1

N 2

2 R OL

T S

H V H T 3

1 R C V

D N I

L A

T N

N O

1 2 T H

S T

H I

E L Y

TH Y

V R N

T 2 K T S

H T 1 8 1 T

S A A D

S 1 1

S C

T E

D T S H H T 0 1 T O S

H T 0 1 N

S A N

H R E

A D T

S H T A 9

1 T S

H T 9 T T

S H T T 9 Y Y D

D T I S

R R E

S E T S

H T H 8 1 B

R V N T E

9 2

E I

E O A

T S V H

7 V V R N D

R V I A A F T Y A A

E M N A E Y

R E Y T S O H P T V W E 6 V K H

V A H C

R O A E

A M V

TH O P A T

A P

V T A 7 W

E H P 5

V R A

S H

1 H

T 2

Y V

A E E

T T N

Y E A

2 U

S O 5 U T

S H T E 4

A E A

T H 2 1 E

H V O V

T 2

S 5

E D

D S S T

S A D R T 3 A C 4

D N

3 T E E

S V A

T C ND E 2 2 P S

O R

1 P

E T S

B 1 3

4 R D

L O R A C T

S T S 1 P 1

R D

Y A W

F S

P M A R

O L A K E V I E W

O R

I N H

O O L

E H

R S

DR D

U L

A Y

R U

O R

D A R

E F

R R

E R

T E

I E

E D

V L

K E E I

H T G U A

G N

S D A

N S

A R

E NY

T MA

A TAM G EK RD

Y CRE

LLS AN

E TAMM H

A LOOP