The United Kingdom's Seventh National Report On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United Kingdom's Seventh National Report On THE UNITED KINGDOM’S SEVENTH NATIONAL REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY January 2017 Contributors to the United Kingdom's National Report The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) prepared this report on behalf of the Department of Energy and Climate Change, in consultation with and incorporating contributions from: Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) EDF Nuclear Generation Limited (EDF NGL) Environment Agency Natural Resources Wales (NRW) Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) NNB Genco (New Licensee - Hinkley Point C) Hitachi-GE (Generic Design Assessment - Requesting Party) Westinghouse (Generic Design Assessment - Requesting Party) Executive Summary This is the seventh report to be submitted by the United Kingdom (UK) in compliance with Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety (hereafter referred to as ‘the Convention’). Since the Convention came into force in 1996, the UK has participated in all six reporting cycles meeting its obligations under the Convention. This report focuses on the UK’s operational civil nuclear power stations. The nuclear industry in the UK continues to evolve, with plans to develop a new generation of nuclear power stations as part of the government’s energy policy in England and Wales. This report discusses new build design and licensing activities and demonstrates the application of modern safety standards and processes to those projects. Major legislative and regulatory changes In accordance with the Convention’s guidance on the scope and nature of national reports, the UK has highlighted the main developments to its legislative and regulatory framework since the Sixth Convention Review Meeting in April 2014, notably: The UK made a significant change to its regulatory organisations on 1 April 2014, when the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) vested as a standalone independent statutory public body, implemented through the Energy Act 2013. ONR is the UK regulator for nuclear safety, civil nuclear security and transport of civil radioactive materials. The Energy Act 2013 also provided ONR with the responsibility for regulating industrial health and safety on nuclear sites. Environmental regulation is the responsibility of each of the UK devolved administrations, the Environment Agency in England, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) in Scotland and Natural Resources Wales (NRW) in Wales. Post-Fukushima improvements The UK continues to report on improvements implemented to enhance nuclear safety following the Fukushima Daiichi accident and the findings from peer review missions. This includes the UK’s position in addressing the European Nuclear Safety Regulators (ENSREG) stress test findings and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) mission to the UK in 2013, which included a specific module on Fukushima. The UK’s approach to addressing the Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety is provided, along with the recommendations from the President’s Report from the Sixth Convention Review meeting. UK response to the Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety The UK can confirm it has reflected on the three principles of the Vienna Declaration during preparation of this report, which focus on ensuring: Principle 1 - New nuclear power plants are designed, sited and constructed to prevent accidents and mitigate any possible release. The UK applies the internationally endorsed principle of defence-in-depth to the design and operation of its nuclear installations and to reducing risks where reasonably practicable; these principles are firmly embedded in ONR’s Safety Assessment Principles (SAPs). There is a clear national policy on siting new reactors with a number of sites already identified. The final layer of defence-in-depth is emergency preparedness and response and the UK continues to develop and test local, regional and national plans to ensure emergency preparedness is maintained and improved. Principle 2 - Comprehensive and systematic through-life safety reviews of existing installations and making timely reasonably practicable improvements. A nuclear site licence requires the licensee to conduct periodic safety reviews at each site. This means that for many years, the UK has been regularly reviewing and re-assessing the safety of its nuclear installations, and making improvements where necessary. The UK, through ONR, maintains oversight of safety significant issues and ensures a proportionate response is taken by licensees in implementing improvements. The UK is leading a Western European Nuclear Regulatory Association (WENRA) initiated working group to establish guidance on the implementation of timely reasonably practical improvements. Principle 3 - National requirements / regulations take due account of IAEA standards and other relevant good practice. The UK actively participates in the Commission on Safety Standards and related committees. The UK applies IAEA Safety Standards and ensures consistency with its own regulations, regulatory requirements and guidance for existing and new nuclear facilities. Challenges from the Sixth Review Meeting The UK has met the five challenges identified by the Special Rapporteur in the President’s Report, which include: 1) Minimising gaps between Contracting Parties safety improvements. Oversight is maintained of the planned programmes of safety improvements, including those implemented post-Fukushima to ensure they are proportionate to the different natural conditions / extreme events predicted in the UK. Information is shared through international peer review processes, bilateral information exchange agreements with both established states and those with emerging nuclear markets, and through open and transparent reporting. 2) Achieving harmonised emergency plans and response measures. The UK takes cognisance of European and international emergency preparedness developments to harmonise and enable improvements in response capabilities. The UK shares information and participates in working groups that support implementation of the European Commission Nuclear Directives and IAEA Basic Safety Standards. The UK collaborates with key European and International bodies including Heads of the European Radiological Protection Competent Authority (HERCA) and WENRA to develop common off-site cross-border emergency approaches. 3) Making better use of operating and regulatory experience and international peer review services. The UK uses intelligence gained from its inspection, assessment and incident reports to identify areas for safety improvements and to inform regulatory strategies and plans. The UK actively participates in IAEA IRRS missions, embracing feedback to ensure continuous improvement. The UK recently hosted an IAEA Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) mission to Sizewell B, which provided a valuable opportunity to exchange technical and regulatory experience between experts and their station counterparts to achieve the common goal of excellence in operational safety. 4) Improving regulator’s independence, safety culture, openness and transparency. ONR’s independence as a regulator is legally anchored in the Energy Act 2013. The Energy Act 2013 defined the purposes and powers of the statutory ONR, enshrining ONR’s independence and key purposes in a single piece of primary legislation. ONR has a policy of presumption of disclosure of information about its activities. Information on regulatory decisions and judgements are made publicly available through the ONR website. 5) Encouraging all countries to participate in international co-operation. The UK works closely with its counterparts in other countries to ensure its approaches reflect international good practice and that lessons are learned from experience elsewhere. ONR collaborates with other national regulators on new reactors, in particular the designs, as part of the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) process through the Multinational Design Evaluation Programme (MDEP). The UK promotes multilateral co-operation through the IAEA on the development of Safety Standards and works with fellow members of the European Union through ENSREG and the wider community via groups such as WENRA. The UK has also made tangible and timely progress addressing feedback from the Special Rapporteur in 2014, notably: • ONR published a revised version of its SAPs in 2014, taking account of the lessons learned from Fukushima. • Implementation of the UK National Action Plan to improve safety post- Fukushima and resilience to beyond design basis events . Other key issues In order to deliver effective regulation of the challenges facing the nuclear industry the UK has adopted an ‘enabling’ and integrated approach to nuclear regulation. This is a constructive approach with licensees, duty holders and other relevant stakeholders that seeks effective delivery against clear and prioritised nuclear safety outcomes. Challenges relating to the regulation of an ageing fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors (AGRs) arise, notably from graphite and boiler integrity issues and in combatting the threats from cyber security. Considerable focus has been placed on ensuring adequate programmes are put in place by licensees to address ageing and obsolescence issues, notably in the area of control and instrumentation. The UK’s security and safety experts work together using integrated approaches to ensure security threats do not have a detrimental effect on safety. The integrated approach taken by ONR is reflected in the UK’s
Recommended publications
  • Development Consent Order Hinkley Point C
    Development Consent Order Hinkley Point C Sheenier and romanticist Rodrique always anagrammatizing bronchoscopically and tread his falsettos. Unpoised Cam cane nattily. Infatuated Lorne potters gleefully, he butts his coequalities very medicinally. Please enter and technology and development consent order to contact details of the application for a fixed rate at the strategy was opposed to our work Hinkley Point C power to everything you need ever know. Like Hinkley Point C the age will be developed by EDF alongside. Hinkley Point C nuclear power station Wikipedia. Support to Hinkley Point C Somerset UK Jacobs. Planning and environmental expertise to National Grid between the Hinkley Point C. SCC Section 106 Outline Proof HPC Development. Reports EDF readies plans for 16bn Sizewell C nuclear plant. Preliminary 1A Citation and commencement 1 Interpretation Principal powers 2 Development consent etc granted by recent Order 2A Effect of the chief on. Company with powerful it is currently developing Hinkley Point C power. Hinkley Point C Connection TEP The Environment. The comments they have appropriate levels of the ability to the uk government decided that completes the company is the consent order to make a premium subscriber notes inform their design. Prepares 1st ever DCO material change application for Hinkley Point 23 January 2019 by Mark Wilding The developer of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power. Sizewell C Nuclear power station plans for Suffolk submitted. Hinkley Point C Local commission Report Appendix B17 Waste 3 May 2012 Page 1 Hinkley Point C Development Consent Order DCO WSCSDCSCC. LETTER 'Stop wasting time on Hinkley' Somerset County. The saga of Hinkley Point C Europe's key nuclear decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Consent Order Application
    Development Hinkley Point C Consent Order Application Draft Development Consent Order Doc Ref 5.3 October 2011 Explanatory Memorandum Any plans, drawings and materials submitted by EDF Energy as part of the Application to the Infrastructure Planning Commission are protected by copyright. You may only use this material (including taking copies of it) in order to (1) inspect those plans, drawings and materials at a more convenient time or place; or (2) to facilitate the exercise of a right to participate in the pre-examination or examination stages of the Application which is available under the Planning Act 2008 and related regulations. Further copies must not be taken without the prior permission of EDF Energy. edfenergy.com EDF Energy Ltd 40 Grosvenor Place London SW1X 7EN. Registered in England & Wales. Company registration number 2366852. © Copyright EDF Energy All rights reserved 2011. The official emblems of the London 2012 Games are © 2007 The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd. All rights reserved. Document 5.3 Herbert Smith LLP THE PLANNING ACT 2008 THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (APPLICATIONS: PRESCRIBED FORMS AND PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS 2009 REGULATION 5(2)(c) THE PROPOSED HINKLEY POINT C (NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION) ORDER EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This explanatory memorandum accompanies an application for development consent for a nuclear generating station and associated development (the "Application") by NNB Generation Company Limited (the "undertaker"). The memorandum explains the purpose and effect of each article of, and Schedule to, the draft Hinkley Point C (Nuclear Generating Station) Order (the "Order"), as required by Regulation 5(2)(c) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 20091.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Development Consent Order Application
    Development Consent NATIONAL GRID WILL Hinkley Point C NEED TO REVIEW FINAL Order Application DOCUMENT Application Summary Document (including Navigation Guide to documentation) Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................................1 Pre-Application Consultation ..................................................................................................................2 Summary of Proposals ..................................................................................................................................4 The New Power Station ..............................................................................................................................7 Workforce, Employment and Skills................................................................................................12 Accommodation Strategy and Proposals ................................................................................14 Transport Strategy and Proposals ..................................................................................................18 Benefits for the Local Community..................................................................................................26 Having Your Say ..............................................................................................................................................27 Navigation Guide for the Application ........................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • EDF Response Draft BL
    Otterhampton Parish Council’s Response to EDF’s Preferred Proposals For Hinkley Point C Combwich Photograph of wharf and village from across the River Parrett Index Page Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………… 3 Section 1 Freight Logistics and Storage Facility at Combwich ……………………….. 4 Section 2 Buildings for storage and fabrication purposes ……………………………... 7 Section 3 Combwich Road Freight Depot ……………………………………………… 8 Section 4 Bus Depot at Freight Logistics Site Combwich ……………………………... 10 Section 5 Combwich Wharf – Refurbishment ………………………………………….. 11 Section 6 Transport Assessment of the EDF Stage 2 Proposals ……………………….. 16 for Hinkley Point C Section 7 Flood Risk Issues ……………………………………………………………. 20 Section 8 Mitigation …………………………………………………………………… 24 Section 9 Adequacy of Consultation …………………………………………………… 26 Section 10 Archaeology ……………………………………………………………….. 28 Section 11 The Natural Environment …………………………………………………. 29 Section 12 Quality of Life Issues ……………………………………………………… 30 Section 13 Compensation ……………………………………………………………... 31 Section 14 Planning Issues…………………………………………………………….. 33 Section 15 Conclusions ………………………………………………………………. 34 Parish Council Contacts ……………………………………………………………….. 34 Appendix 1. Otterhampton Parish Council Questionnaire ………………………………. 36 2. Failure of Consultation Document …………………………………………. 38 3. Initial Letter to EDF 26th August 2010 …………………………………….. 43 4. Statement to Somerset County Council Scrutiny Committee …………....... 45 5. Statement to Somerset County Council Cabinet……………………………. 46 6. Comments from OPC Questionnaire
    [Show full text]
  • “Burnham Evolution” Business Plan: 2018-2023
    “Burnham Evolution” Business Plan: 2018-2023 Burnham-on-Sea & Highbridge Town Council Version record 1st draft (working draft for Project Team) 4th May 2018 2nd draft (working draft to inform consultation material) 18th May 2018 3rd draft (shaped by consultation response) 12th June 2018 4th draft (for Town Council sign-off) 15th June 2018 Final 19th June 2018 Produced in partnership with Burnham Evolution Project Team by: Stuart Todd, Director (BA(Hons), Dip. TRP, MRTPI) Office: SASP Office Suite, Chelston Business Park, Castle Road, Wellington, Somerset, TA21 9JQ. Stuart Todd Associates Ltd. - Registered Company no. 8284517. t: 07964 944920 e: [email protected] w: www.stuarttoddassociates.co.uk Images copyright Stuart Todd Associates Ltd. apart from Low Lighthouse (BoS&HTC), Princess Theatre in project section (Princess Theatre), consultation pictures in section 9 and Pavilion (close-up) (BoS&HTC) All icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com Burnham Evolution Business Plan Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Project Team ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. About Burnham-on-Sea .................................................................................................................. 7 2.1. Location and Connectivity ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Project Hinkley Point C Project SPD - Sustainability Appraisal Report
    West Somerset Council & Sedgemoor District Council Hinkley Point C Project Hinkley Point C Project SPD - Sustainability Appraisal Report Final Version | October 2011 This report takes into account the particular instructions and expectations of our client. Ove Arup & Partners Ltd It is not intended for and should not be relied 63 St Thomas Street upon by any third party and no responsibility is Bristol undertaken to any third party. BS1 6JZ United Kingdom www.arup.com Job number 210482-00 Document Verification Job title Hinkley Point C Project Job number 210482-00 Document title Hinkley Point C Project SPD - Sustainability Appraisal File reference Report Consultation Draft Document ref 210482 -00 Revision Date Filename Draft 1 05/01/11 Description First draft for comment Prepared by Checked by Approved by Ann Cousins / Ben Name Peter Hulson Mark Smith Walmsley Signature Issue 03/02/11 Filename Hinkley_SA_Report_Dr aft1_2011-002-03_.docx Description For review by West Somerset Council and Sedgemoor District Council Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Ben Walmsley / Tim Durant / Peter Mark Smith Ruairi Revell Hulson Signature Rev A 25/02/11 Filename HPC SPD SA report_2011-02-25_for comment.docx Description Draft for final comment Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Ben Walmsley / Tim Durant / Peter Mark Smith Ruairi Revell Hulson Signature Final Filename HPC_S PD_SA_Final_Draft_2011-10-14 Draft Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document 210482-00 | Final Version October
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point
    Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Hinkley Point EN-6: Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation Planning for new energy infrastructure October 2010 2 Preface: Appraisal of Sustainability of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement The Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS), incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement (Nuclear NPS) has been undertaken at a strategic level. It considers the effects of the proposed policy at a national level and the sites to be assessed for their suitability for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025. These strategic appraisals are part of an ongoing assessment process that started in March 2008 and, following completion of this AoS, will continue with project level assessments when developers make applications for development consent in relation to specific projects. Applications for development consents to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) will need to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement having been the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The AoS/SEA Reports are presented in the following documents: AoS Non-Technical Summary Main AoS Report of revised draft Nuclear NPS Introduction Approach and Methods Alternatives Radioactive Waste Findings Summary of Sites Technical Appendices Annexes to Main AoS Report: Reports on Sites Site AoS Reports Technical Appendices All documents are available on the website of the Department of Energy and Climate Change at http://www.energynpsconsultation.decc.gov.uk This document is the Appraisal of Sustainability: Site Report for Hinkley. This report has been prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change with expert input from a team of specialist planning and environmental consultancies led by MWH UK Ltd with Enfusion Ltd, Nicholas Pearson Associates Ltd, Studsvik UK Ltd and Metoc plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point B Power Station
    Hinkley Point B Power Station Emergency information for local residents © EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd 2019 Barnett Way Barnwood Gloucester GL4 3RS Published by: EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd in accordance with the Radiation [Emergency Preparedness & Public Information] Regulations 2001. Off site nuclear emergency information You have received this calendar because your residential / business premises lie within 3.5km/2.2 miles (the detailed emergency planning zone) of Hinkley Point B Power Station. Please refer to the location map inside the front cover of this calendar. This calendar describes how the emergency arrangements might affect you as a local resident, visitor or worker. It has been issued by the site operator in accordance with the Radiation [Emergency Preparedness & Public Information] Regulations 2001 (REPPIR). Please retain this calendar. • Nuclear power stations are designed, operated and regulated to ensure that accidents are highly unlikely. However, it is prudent to have arrangements to deal with such a situation should it occur. • The information contained in this calendar tells you about these arrangements and explains what you need to do in the event of an emergency to protect you from exposure to radiation and radioactive material. Initially Go in Stay in Tune in Contents 1. Actions 2. Information 3. Further information 4. Location of rest centres 5. Registration card If you occupy a residential or business premises within the area, you will have been issued with a supply of stable iodine tablets. These need to be kept in a safe place, which should be recorded here in case you need to find them. Safe place: _________________________________________________________________ Hinkley Point B Power Station 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Pre-Application Consultation
    HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION 2 NEW NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT AT HINKLEY POINT 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Need for Nuclear 2.3 The Suitability of the Hinkley Point Site 2.4 Local Site Selection HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTAtion – CONTENTS 2 NEW NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT AT HINKLEY POINT 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 The Government’s draft Nuclear NPS will consider the need for and siting of new nuclear power stations at a strategic level. EDF Energy's DCO application will therefore not address these issues, but will focus on the potential local impact of the proposed development and the measures taken to minimise these so far as is reasonably practicable. EDF Energy will address this by providing detailed information on the development proposals together with a full assessment of environmental impacts in the Environmental Statement. Responses to this pre- application consultation will also play a key part in helping the IPC assess whether the development proposals on and off-site are appropriate to grant consent. 2.1.2 However, although this consultation is not about national energy policy or strategic site selection, EDF Energy believes it will be helpful to those reading this document to have a summary of these issues and the processes under way which address them. This section sets out to provide this. 2.2 The Need for Nuclear 2.2.1 EDF Energy believes there is a strong case for new nuclear development in the UK. The challenges of energy security and climate change pose enormous threats to society. Government has recognised the importance of tackling these challenges and has set out a course for transition to a low carbon economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgwater Threat to Nuclear Waste Store
    Bridgwater Don’t Panic! says our local MP Thebastian Blinkerton Courier page 7 Tuesday 6th October 2112 www.stophinkley.org Est. 1986 20p Hinkley on fire! Threat to nuclear waste store After two days of fires, smoke and This article is a glimpse into what could happen if the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station is built. We hope it never is. evacuation, emergency workers are To find out why Hinkley C is a bad idea – for safety, economic still not in control. Tanya Howitz reports: and environmental reasons – see www.stophinkley.org A heavy black cloud of smoke The waste storage vaults, The original plan was for the Hinkley C: A Very hung over the Hinkley Point site located next to the now defunct Flooding risk spent fuel from Hinkley C to be near Bridgwater yesterday as Hinkley Point C nuclear power There is also a threat of flooding transferred to a national waste Expensive Mistake firefighters fought to contain a station, contain an estimated from the Bristol Channel, only a disposal site. This was supposed The Hinkley C power station blaze near storage vaults for 3,000 tonnes of “spent fuel” – few hundred metres from the to open soon after 2040. But never worked properly, mainly highly radioactive waste. used fuel assemblies regularly vaults. there are still ongoing because of computing error The fire is believed to have removed from the two reactors In 2100 the sea, whose level arguments about where it will breakdowns. After cracks started in spilled diesel oil from over their 40 year operating life.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinkley Point C Pre-Construction Safety Report 3
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page No.: i / iii REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION HPC PCSR3 – Sub-chapter 2.1 – Reference: HPC-NNBOSL-U0-000-RES- Site Description and Data 100006 NNB GENERATION COMPANY LTD REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION HPC PCSR3: CHAPTER 2 – SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND LAYOUT SUB-CHAPTER 2.1 – SITE DESCRIPTION AND DATA { PI Removed } © 2017 Published in the United Kingdom by NNB Generation Company Limited (NNB GenCo), 90 Whitfield Street – London, W1T 4EZ. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording,APPROVED without the written permission of the copyright holder NNB GenCo, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Requests for copies of this document should be referred to Head of Business Architecture, NNB Generation Company Limited (NNB GenCo), 90 Whitfield Street – London, W1T 4EZ. The electronic copy is the current issue and printing renders this document uncontrolled. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page No.: ii / iii REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION HPC PCSR3 – Sub-chapter 2.1 – Reference: Site Description and Data HPC-NNBOSL-U0-000-RES- 100006 APPROVAL SIGN-OFF: { PI Removed } DOCUMENT CONTROL { PI Removed } REVISION HISTORY { PI Removed } Text within this document that is enclosed within brackets {…} is Sensitive Nuclear Information, Sensitive Commercial Information or Personal Information and has been removed. APPROVED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page No.: iii / iii REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION HPC PCSR3 – Sub-chapter 2.1 – Reference: Site Description and Data HPC-NNBOSL-U0-000-RES- 100006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Bridgwater Port Operations Manual Revision 9 February 2021
    Port of Bridgwater PORT OPERATIONS MANUAL Revision 9 – February 2021 Prepared by: Capt. K Badsey Sedgemoor District Council Bridgwater House King Square Bridgwater Somerset TA6 3AR Tel: 44 (0)300 303 7799 email: [email protected] Website www.sedgemoor.gov.uk/portofbridgwater REVISION RECORD Received & inserted Date Remove Pages Insert Pages into plan by: Original - - - Oct 2006 November 2007 Not recorded Not recorded Not recorded Update May - Various Details - 2008 Updated 9, 11, 14, 20, 22, 9, 11, 14, 20, 22, July 2009 26, 28,30, 37, 26, 28,30, 37, 47, 47, 55, 57 55, 57 August 2014 Plan reviewed and re-issued as Revision 6 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 August 2015 K.Badsey 2014 2015 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 August 2016 K.Badsey 2015 2016 August 2016 (Amend 1 to 1, 6, 8 1, 6, 8 K.Badsey 2014 Plan) Sept 2017 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 K.Badsey 2016 2017 July 2018 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 K.Badsey 2017 2018 Sept 2019 Plan reviewed and re-issued as Revision 7 Aug 2020 (Amend 1 to v,1,3,8 v,1,3,8 K.Badsey 2019 Plan) August 2020 Plan updated to meet accessibility requirements February 2021 Plan updated regarding Max vessel dimensions Combwich (Page 7) Contents: Page Part 1 - Introduction 1.1 Statutory Harbour Authority 1 1.2 Competent Harbour Authority 1 1.3 Duty Holder 1 1.4 Designated Person 1 1.5 Policies 1.5.1 General Policies 2 1.5.2 Marine Safety Policy 2 Part 2 – Management of the Port 2.1 Local Legislation and general description 2.1.1 Geography 3 2.1.2 Local Acts 3 2.1.3 Port Limits 4 2.1.4 Tides and Tidal Ranges 5 2.1.5 Anchorages 5 2.1.6
    [Show full text]