The Child's Right to Participation – Reality Or Rhetoric? 301 Pp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Law and Contemporary Forms of Slavery: an Economic and Social Rights-Based Approach A
Penn State International Law Review Volume 23 Article 15 Number 4 Penn State International Law Review 5-1-2005 International Law and Contemporary Forms of Slavery: An Economic and Social Rights-Based Approach A. Yasmine Rassam Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Recommended Citation Rassam, A. Yasmine (2005) "International Law and Contemporary Forms of Slavery: An Economic and Social Rights-Based Approach," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 23: No. 4, Article 15. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol23/iss4/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I Articles I International Law and Contemporary Forms of Slavery: An Economic and Social Rights-Based Approach A. Yasmine Rassam* I. Introduction The prohibition of slavery is non-derogable under comprehensive international and regional human rights treaties, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights'; the International Covenant on Civil and * J.S.D. Candidate, Columbia University School of Law. LL.M. 1998, Columbia University School of Law; J.D., magna cum laude, 1994, Indiana University, Bloomington; B.A. 1988, University of Virginia. I would like to thank the Columbia Law School for their financial support. I would also like to thank Mark Barenberg, Lori Damrosch, Alice Miller, and Peter Rosenblum for their comments and guidance on earlier drafts of this article. I am grateful for the editorial support of Clara Schlesinger. -
Contemporary Slavery and Its Definition In
Contemporary Slavery 2 and Its Definition in Law Jean Allain Had Olaudah Equiano, Abraham Lincoln, or William Wilberforce been able to look into the future to the twenty-first century, what they may have been most struck by was not how far we had come in ending slav- ery and suppressing human exploitation but, rather, that we had yet to agree on what in fact the term “slavery” means. This is a rather intrigu- ing puzzle, as a consensus has existed for more than eighty-five years among states as to the legal definition of slavery. Yet, this definition has failed to take hold among the general public or to “speak” to those in- stitutions interested in the ending of slavery. At first blush, this is not so hard to understand since the definition, drafted in the mid-1920s by legal experts, is rather opaque and seems to hark back to a bygone era. The definition found in the 1926 Slavery Convention reads: “Slavery is the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership is exercised.”1 At first sight, the definition really does not convey much to the reader, but for the fact that it appears to require that a person own another. As the ownership of one person by another has been legislated out of existence – again – it appears that this definition would have no traction in the contemporary world. Yet, this is not so since the legal definition of slavery established in 1926 has been confirmed twice: first, by being included in substance in the 1956 Supplementary Convention Contemporary Slavery -
The Determinants of Child Labor: Theory and Evidence
RESEARCH SEMINAR IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS School of Public Policy The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1220 Discussion Paper No. 486 The Determinants of Child Labor: Theory and Evidence Drusilla K. Brown Tufts University Alan V. Deardorff and Robert M. Stern University of Michigan September, 2002 Recent RSIE Discussion Papers are available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.spp.umich.edu/rsie/workingpapers/wp.html 2 THE DETERMINANTS OF CHILD LABOR: THEORY AND EVIDENCE By Drusilla K. Brown Tufts University Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan and Robert M. Stern University of Michigan September 2002 I. Introduction The specter of small children toiling long hours under dehumanizing conditions has precipitated an intense debate concerning child labor over the past decade and a half. As during the midst of the 19th century industrial revolution, policymakers and the public have attempted to come to grips with the causes and consequences of child labor. Coordinating a policy response has revealed the complexity and moral ambiguity of the phenomenon of working children. Although child labor has been the norm throughout history, the fact of children working and the difficult conditions under which children work occasionally become more evident. In the midst of the 19th century, child labor became more visible because children were drawn into an industrial setting. Currently, child labor has become more visible because of the increase in the number of children producing goods for export. Our purpose here is not to provide a definitive diagnosis of the causes and consequences of child labor, but rather to review the existing theoretical, empirical, and historical literature as to why and when children work. -
The Ilo's Shifts in Child Labour Policy: Regulation and Abolition
Chapter 7 The ilo’s Shifts in Child Labour Policy: Regulation and Abolition Edward van Daalen and Karl Hanson Abstract After wwii the International Labour Organization (ilo) slowly but surely developed a ‘two plank’ approach to child labour, aimed at harmonising the need to protect chil- dren who do work, with the long-term goal of abolishing all forms of child labour. Dur- ing the 1990s the ‘two plank’ approach, which included the regulation and humanisa- tion of children’s work, gradually evolved into a more singular approach aimed only at the full eradication of all child labour, starting with the ‘worst forms’. Based on an anal- ysis of the relevant legal and policy documents produced by the ilo and other inter- national Organizations, completed with in-depth interviews with key informants, we examine the internal and external developments that made the ‘abolitionist’ approach now the only perspective that shapes the ilo’s child labour policies. We conclude that, after a century of ilo child labour policy, the intermediate objective of improving chil- dren’s working conditions is now just as relevant as it was before the turn away from the ‘two plank’ approach. For the ilo to shift its position at this time, it needs to reach out to the research community, international development actors as well as local gov- ernments and social movements to develop locally relevant, evidence-based policies for dealing with the diversity of children’s work in the world’s fast changing formal and informal economies. 1 Introduction The abolition of child labour has been one of the principle objectives of the International Labour Organization (ilo) ever since its inception in 1919. -
Chapter Iii Children; Easy to Target
CHAPTER III CHILDREN; EASY TO TARGET CHILD TRAFFICKING III CHAPTER 3 CHILDREN;139 EASY TO TARGET Globally, one in every three victims detected is a child. FIG. 49 Shares of detected victims of traf- Patterns about the age profile of the victims, however, ap- ficking, by age group and national pear to change drastically across different regions. Coun- income,* 2018 (or most recent) tries in West Africa, South Asia and Central America and 100% the Caribbean typically present a much higher share of 90% children among total victims detected. 80% More broadly, differences in the age composition of de- 50 70% tected victims appear to be related to the income level of 67 63 60% the country of detection. The detection of children ac- 86 count for a significantly higher proportion in low income 50% countries when compared to high income countries. As 40% such, wealthier countries tend to detect more adults than 30% children among the trafficking victims. 50 20% These differences could be the result of varying criminal 33 37 justice focuses in different parts of the world. At the same 10% 14 time, however, they may reflect different trafficking pat- 0% terns according to countries’ socio-economic conditions. High Upper Lower Low Income Income Middle Middle Countries Countries Income Income This chapter provides an overview of the dynamics relat- Countries Countries ed to the trafficking of children. The first section discuss- es the main forms of child trafficking, namely trafficking Share of adult victims detected (18 years old or above) for forced labour and trafficking for sexual exploitation. -
Unfree Labor, Capitalism and Contemporary Forms of Slavery
Unfree Labor, Capitalism and Contemporary Forms of Slavery Siobhán McGrath Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science, New School University Economic Development & Global Governance and Independent Study: William Milberg Spring 2005 1. Introduction It is widely accepted that capitalism is characterized by “free” wage labor. But what is “free wage labor”? According to Marx a “free” laborer is “free in the double sense, that as a free man he can dispose of his labour power as his own commodity, and that on the other hand he has no other commodity for sale” – thus obliging the laborer to sell this labor power to an employer, who possesses the means of production. Yet, instances of “unfree labor” – where the worker cannot even “dispose of his labor power as his own commodity1” – abound under capitalism. The question posed by this paper is why. What factors can account for the existence of unfree labor? What role does it play in an economy? Why does it exist in certain forms? In terms of the broadest answers to the question of why unfree labor exists under capitalism, there appear to be various potential hypotheses. ¾ Unfree labor may be theorized as a “pre-capitalist” form of labor that has lingered on, a “vestige” of a formerly dominant mode of production. Similarly, it may be viewed as a “non-capitalist” form of labor that can come into existence under capitalism, but can never become the central form of labor. ¾ An alternate explanation of the relationship between unfree labor and capitalism is that it is part of a process of primary accumulation. -
The Barefoot Lawyers: Prosecuting Child Labour in the Supreme Court of India
THE BAREFOOT LAWYERS: PROSECUTING CHILD LABOUR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Ranjan K. Agarwal* I. INTRODUCTION On the eve of India’s independence from British rule, India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, issued a challenge to the constituent assembly: “We end today a period of ill fortune and India discovers herself again. The achievement we celebrate today is but a step, an opening of opportunity, to the greater triumphs and achievements that await us. Are we brave enough and wise enough to grasp this opportunity and accept the challenge of the future?”1 For the most part, this challenge has gone unmet in the fifty-seven years since India’s independence. In 1999, twenty-six percent of Indians lived below the poverty line; sixteen percent of the population was officially “destitute” in 1998.2 As of 1997, India’s literacy rate was fifty-two percent, amongst the lowest in the world.3 Indians respond that their country is the largest democracy in the world, and one of the few democracies in Asia. In the face of economic hardship, communal and religious strife, the horrors of partition and the legacy of colonialism, India has remained a democratic country. Even then, democracy has not achieved for India the position of influence in the world and the more widely shared prosperity that its citizens hoped for their country. Too many Indians are poor, hungry, illiterate and view their government with contempt. For example, Indian newspapers estimate that hundreds of suspected criminals stood for election in the 1997 municipal votes in Delhi and Mumbai.4 Transparency International, a German anti-corruption organization, ranks India amongst the most corrupt * B.A. -
Analysis of the Definition of Trafficking in Human Beings in the Palermo Protocol
Analysis of the definition of trafficking in human beings in the Palermo Protocol October 2005 Marjan Wijers (LL.M, MA) Table of content General introduction Part I The Palermo Protocol 1. Introduction 2. Definition of trafficking in human beings in the Palermo Protocol 3. Background 4. The concept of “exploitation” 5. Relation between trafficking in human beings and prostitution 5.1 The concept of forced prostitution: can prostitutes be trafficked? 6. The issue of consent 7. Relation between trafficking in human beings and smuggling 8. Relation between trafficking in human beings and the forced labour or slavery-like outcomes of trafficking 9. Relation with the parent Convention: the crossing of borders and the involvement of organised crime 10. Intent, attempting, participating, organising and directing 11. Definition of victim Part II Explanation of the different elements of the definition 1. Introduction 2. The “acts” 3. The “means” 3.1 The issue of consent 4. The “purposes”: the concept of exploitation Exploitation of the prostitution of others and sexual exploitation Removal of organs Illegal adoption Part III Interpreting the Protocol: meaning and interpretation of the various prohibitions on forced labour, slavery and related practices 1. Introduction 2. Universal Declaration on Human Rights, 1948 2 3. Slavery Convention, 1926, amended by Protocol, 1953 4. UN Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade and Practices similar to Slavery, 1956 5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966 6. ILO Conventions on Forced Labour No. 29, 1930, and No. 105, 1957 7. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 8. -
Hazardous Child Labor
Child Labor Module Series UI Center for Human Rights Child Labor Research Initiative Hazardous Child Labor by Lois Crowley and Marlene Johnson SETPEMBER 2004 Series Editors Gregory Hamot, Chivy Sok, Carol Brown Hazardous child labour is a betrayal of every child’s rights as a human being and is an offence against our civilization. UNICEF State of the World’s Children 1997 The UI Center for Human Rights 300 Communications Center * The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 Tel (319) 335-3900 Fax (319) 335-1340 http://clri.uichr.org/ and www.uichr.org © Copyright 2004 by The University of Iowa Center for Human Rights. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce this publication, in whole or in part, provided that The University of Iowa Center for Human Rights is identified as the sponsor and proper notice of copyright as stated above is affixed to each copy. The University of Iowa prohibits discrimination in employment and in its educational programs and activities on the basis of race, national origin, color, creed, religion, sex, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or as associational preference. The University also affirms its commitment to providing equal opportunities and equal access to University facilities. For additional information on nondiscrimination policies, contact the Coordinator of Title IX, Section 504, and the ADA in the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (319) 335-0705 (voice) and (319) 335-0697 (text), 202 Jessup Hall, The University of Iowa, Iowa 52242-1316. Disclaimer ] Funding for the Child Labor Research Initiative (Contract Number: J-9-K-1-0019) was secured by U.S. -
Child-Slavery-Fact-Sheet-2016.Pdf
Fact sheet Child slavery Despite the fact that many people Why do children work? believe that slavery no longer exists, the International Labour Most children work because their Organization (ILO) estimated that families are poor and their labour is there are some 5.5 million children necessary for their survival. in slavery across the world. Children are often employed Child slavery is often confused with because, compared to adults, they child labour, but is much worse. are more easily controlled and are Whilst child labour is harmful for unlikely to demand higher wages or children and hinders their education better working conditions. and development, child slavery For many children, school is not an occurs when a child’s labour is option. Education can be expensive, exploited for someone’s else gain. Said (13) and Yarg (16) or schoola are physically The brothers were born into slavery inaccessible. in a wealthy family in Mauritania. They worked all day from a very As well as being a result of poverty, early age whilst their master’s child labour also perpetuates children went to school and played poverty. Many working children do football. not have the opportunity to go to school and often grow up to be “We weren’t allowed to eat the unskilled adults trapped in poorly same food as the rest of the family, paid jobs. or sleep in the same rooms, or wear the same clothes. They would beat Photo: Child bonded labourer in India’s brick kiln I had to work seventeen hours Credit: Bharat Patel us for any reason at all.” a day and they gave me no time This group of children includes: The boys managed to escape five off. -
Childrens' Rights in the South African Constitution
CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN THE SOUTH-AFRICAN CONSTITUTION* Prof JA Robinson 1. INTRODUCTION It is a truism that both the history of a country and its peoples and the dispensation the country aspires to be, is to some degree reflected in its Constitution. South Africa is certainly no exception. The constitutional dispensation that came into effect in South Africa on the 27th April 1994 was designed to innovate social, political and legal structures that would be radically different from those of the country's past history.1 The Constitution not only recognises the injustices of the past, but also depicts the new South Africa as an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom.2 To this end the constitutional Bill of Rights provides the legally enforceable backing. In the new dispensation any institution associated with the discrimination and repression practices of apartheid South Africa is * This contribution will also be published in the series Forum Juris Internationalis presented by the Faculty of Law, Justus Liebig Universität, Gießen, Germany. 1 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993 (hereafter referred to as the Interim Constitution) came into force on the 27th April 1994. It effected radical changes in the sense that henceforth the franchise and associated political and civil rights would be accorded to all citizens without racial qualification and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty was now replaced by the doctrine of constitutional supremacy. The Interim Constitution was formally adopted as an Act of the pre- democratic Tricameral Parliament and was only meant to be a transitional Constitution. -
2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor
From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.