Local Government Councils' Performance and Public Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ending CHILD MARRIAGE and TEENAGE PREGNANCY in Uganda
ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA 1 A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) gratefully acknowledges the valuable contribution of many individuals whose time, expertise and ideas made this research a success. Gratitude is extended to the Research Team Lead by Dr. Florence Kyoheirwe Muhanguzi with support from Prof. Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo and all the Research Assistants for the 10 districts for their valuable support to the research process. Lastly, UNICEF would like to acknowledge the invaluable input of all the study respondents; women, men, girls and boys and the Key Informants at national and sub national level who provided insightful information without whom the study would not have been accomplished. I ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................I -
The Imaramagambo Onchocerciasis Focus In
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 95(2), 2016, pp. 417–425 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.16-0181 Copyright © 2016 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene The Imaramagambo Onchocerciasis Focus in Southwestern Uganda: Interruption of Transmission after Disappearance of the Vector Simulium neavei and Its Associated Freshwater Crabs Moses N. Katabarwa,1* James Katamanywa,2 Thomson Lakwo,3 Peace Habomugisha,4 Edson Byamukama,4 David Oguttu,3 Christine Nahabwe,3 Monica Ngabirano,3 Ephraim Tukesiga,2 Annet Khainza,4 Edridah Tukahebwa,3 Thomas R. Unnasch,5 Frank O. Richards,1 and Rolf Garms6 1Health Programs, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia; 2Health Services, Kabarole District, Fort Portal, Uganda; 3Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; 4Health Programs, The Carter Center, Kampala, Uganda; 5University of South Florida, Global Health, Tampa, Florida; 6Tropical Medicine Department, Bernhard Nocht Institute of Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany Abstract. It was not until early 1990s that, when the Imaramagambo focus of southwest Uganda was mapped, mass treatment with a single annual dose of ivermectin for onchocerciaisis control commenced. However, comprehensive investigations on its transmission were launched after a nationwide policy for onchocerciasis elimination in 2007. Ento- mological surveys throughout the focus from 2007 to 2015 have yielded few or no freshwater crabs (Potamonautes aloysiisabaudiae), which serve as the obligate phoretic host of the larvae and pupae of the vector Simulium neavei.No S. neavei flies have been observed or collected since 2007. Skin snips (microscopy) from 294 individuals in 2008 were negative for skin microfilariae, and of the 462 persons analyzed by polymerase chain reaction skin snip poolscreen in 2009, only five (1.08%) persons were indicated as infected with onchocerciasis. -
Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report
UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation. -
Contact List for District Health O Cers & District Surveillance Focal Persons
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Contact List for District Health Ocers & District Surveillance Focal Persons THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH FIRST NAME LAST NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS DISTRICT TITLE MOBILEPHONE Adunia Anne [email protected] ADJUMANI DHO 772992437 Olony Paul [email protected] ADJUMANI DSFP 772878005 Emmanuel Otto [email protected] AGAGO DHO 772380481 Odongkara Christopher [email protected] AGAGO DSFP 782556650 Okello Quinto [email protected] AMOLATAR DHO 772586080 Mundo Okello [email protected] AMOLATAR DSFP 772934056 Sagaki Pasacle [email protected] AMUDAT DHO 772316596 Elimu Simon [email protected] AMUDAT DSFP 752728751 Wala Maggie [email protected] AMURIA DHO 784905657 Olupota Ocom [email protected] AMURIA DSFP 771457875 Odong Patrick [email protected] AMURU DHO 772840732 Okello Milton [email protected] AMURU DSFP 772969499 Emer Mathew [email protected] APAC DHO 772406695 Oceng Francis [email protected] APAC DSFP 772356034 Anguyu Patrick [email protected] ARUA DHO 772696200 Aguakua Anthony [email protected] ARUA DSFP 772198864 Immelda Tumuhairwe [email protected] BUDUDA DHO 772539170 Zelesi Wakubona [email protected] BUDUDA DSFP 782573807 Kiirya Stephen [email protected] BUGIRI DHO 772432918 Magoola Peter [email protected] BUGIRI DSFP 772574808 Peter Muwereza [email protected] BUGWERI DHO 782553147 Umar Mabodhe [email protected] BUGWERI DSFP 775581243 Turyasingura Wycliffe [email protected] BUHWEJU DHO 773098296 Bemera Amon [email protected] -
Usaid's Malaria Action Program for Districts
USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS GENDER ANALYSIS MAY 2017 Contract No.: AID-617-C-160001 June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis i USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS Gender Analysis May 2017 Contract No.: AID-617-C-160001 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis ii DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis iii Table of Contents ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... VIII 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................1 COUNTRY CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................3 USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS .................................................................6 STUDY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................6 -
E464 Volume I1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM
E464 Volume i1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM Public Disclosure Authorized Preparedfor: UGANDA A3 NILE its POWER Richmond;UK Public Disclosure Authorized Fw~~~~I \ If~t;o ,.-, I~~~~~~~ jt .4 ,. 't' . .~ Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: t~ IN),I "%4fr - - tt ?/^ ^ ,s ENVIRONMENTAL 111teinlauloln.al IMPACT i-S(. Illf STATEME- , '. vi (aietlph,t:an,.daw,,, -\S_,,y '\ /., 'cf - , X £/XL March, 2001 - - ' Public Disclosure Authorized _, ,;' m.. .'ILE COPY I U Technical Resettlement Technical Resettlement Appendices and A e i ActionPlan ,Community ApenicsAcinPla Dlevelopment (A' Action Plan (RCDAP') The compilete Bujagali Project EIA consists of 7 documents Note: Thetransmission system documentation is,for the most part, the same as fhat submittedto ihe Ugandcn National EnvironmentalManagement Authority(NEMAI in December 2000. Detailsof the changes made to the documentation betwoon Dccomber 2000 and the presentsubmission aro avoiloblo from AESN P. Only the graphics that have been changed since December, 2000 hove new dates. FILE: DOChUME[NTC ,ART.CD I 3 fOOt'ypnIp, .asod 1!A/SJV L6'.'''''' '' '.' epurf Ut tUISWXS XillJupllD 2UI1SIXg Itb L6 ... NOJIDSaS1J I2EIof (INY SISAlVNV S2IAIlVNTIuaJ bV _ b6.sanl1A Puu O...tp.s.. ZA .6san1r^A pue SD)flSUIa1DJltJJ WemlrnIn S- (7)6. .. .--D)qqnd llH S bf 68 ..............................................................--- - -- io ---QAu ( laimpod u2Vl b,-£ 6L ...................................... -SWulaue lu;DwIa:43Spuel QSI-PUU'l Z btl' 6L .............................................----- * -* -SaULepunog QAfjP.4SlUTtUPad l SL. sUOItllpuo ltUiOUOZg-OioOS V£ ££.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A2~~~~~~~~~3V s z')J -4IOfJIrN 'Et (OAIOsOa.. Isoa0 joJxxNsU uAWom osILr) 2AX)SO> IsaIo4 TO•LWN ZU£N 9s ... suotll puoD [eOT20olla E SS '' ''''''''..........''...''................................. slotNluolqur wZ S5 ' '' '' '' ' '' '' '' - - - -- -........................- puiN Z'Z'£ j7i.. .U.13 1uu7EF ................... -
Medicines Consumer Awareness Campaign Project Report
MEDICINES CONSUMER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PROJECT REPORT 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Cardno Emerging Markets USA, Ltd. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONSUMER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PROJECT REPORT Authors: Coalition for Health Promotion and Social Development (HEPS Uganda) Submitted by: Cardno Emerging Markets USA, Ltd. Submitted to: USAID/Uganda Contract No.: AID-617-C-13-00005 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Consumer Awareness Campaign Project Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATION........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Introduction -
Case Study of Rufuuha Wetland, Ntungamo District
Land Restoration Training Programme Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland Final project 2018 ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF FRINGE COMMUNITIES ON WETLAND MANAGEMENT IN UGANDA: CASE STUDY OF RUFUUHA WETLAND, NTUNGAMO DISTRICT Dinnah Tumwebaze Ntungamo District Local Government P.O Box 01 Ntungamo [email protected] Supervisor Victor Pajuelo Madrigal SVARMI [email protected] ABSTRACT To ensure the health and wellbeing of the human population, wetlands should be managed sustainably to continue the services they provide and the justifiable exploitation of the earth’s resources. Cautious action needs to be directed towards the maintenance of the significant support systems of the ecosystem services on the globe, such as wetlands. This study aimed to assess the perception of fringe communities on the management of the Rufuuha wetland, Ntungamo District in south-western Uganda. The methodologies used in this study included simple random sampling. Results indicated that the state of Rufuuha wetland has been notably influenced by a lack of awareness of the wetland laws and regulations and a high local illiteracy level on sustainable wetland management. There is a need for sensitization of the community and an encouraging bottom-up approach in formulation and implementation of wetland laws. Key words: Perception, fringe community, wetland management, Ntungamo District. UNU Land Restoration Training Programme This paper should be cited as: Tumwebaze D (2018) Assessing the perception of fringe communities on wetland management Uganda: A case study of Rufuuha wetland, Ntungamo District. United Nations University Land Restoration Training Programme [final project] http://www.unulrt.is/static/fellows/document/tumwebeze2018.pdf ii UNU Land Restoration Training Programme TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. -
Soil and Water Conservation Technologies in the Upper Rwizi Micro- Catchment of Southwestern Uganda
Soil and Water Conservation Technologies in the Upper Rwizi Micro- catchment of Southwestern Uganda he continuing decline of agricultural desertification, siltation of waterways, and flooding, productivity in many areas in Uganda, among others. Tparticularly in the Lake Victoria Basin (LVB), has been attributed to land degradation and, as The rapid land-use changes taking place in the LVB, a consequence, farmers encroach on forests, including the upper Rwizi micro-catchment, continue wetlands, and marginal steep slopes (NEMA, to contribute to land degradation. For instance, 2009; Mugonola, 2013c). Cultivation of these banana production in the Rwizi-micro catchment areas using unsustainable agricultural production of southwestern Uganda is expanding rapidly in methods contributes to increased soil erosion, response to increasing demand for cooking banana loss of buffering capacity, sediment deposition, in urban places in Uganda and neighboring countries. and pollution of water bodies. Degradation of farm This rapid expansion leads to changing land use and and rangeland has on-farm and off-farm effects. conversion of marginal areas (wetlands, steep slopes, On-farm, it leads to reduced current and future valley bottoms) for agricultural production. However, land productivity and land values, while off-farm, these new areas may not sustainably support soil erosion results in environmental degradation, crop production because they are prone to land degradation through soil erosion. Soil losses through swamps and finally discharges into Lake Victoria erosion leads to loss of the topsoil, organic matter, through River Bukora, the Sanga plains, and Lake and inadequate water penetration and retention. Mburo National Park. River Rwizi is drained by The resulting effect is crop failure and reduced the Itojo wetland systems in Ntungamo District, productivity due to nutrient and moisture stresses. -
Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC and RESISTIVITY PROFILING (16/20)
Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (15/20) A - 65 Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (16/20) A - 66 Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (17/20) A - 67 Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (18/20) A - 68 Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (19/20) A - 69 Fig. A6.3 MAGNETIC AND RESISTIVITY PROFILING (20/20) A - 70 FIG. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (1/20) A - 71 FIG. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (2/20) A - 72 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (3/20) A - 73 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (4/20) A - 74 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (5/20) A - 75 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (6/20) A - 76 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (7/20) A - 77 A - 77 (8/20) Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDINGA - 78 LAYER ANALYSIS A - 78 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (9/20) A - 79 A - 79 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (10/20) A - 80 A - 80 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (11/20) A - 81 A - 81 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (12/20) A - 82 A - 82 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (13/20) A - 83 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (14/20) A - 84 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (15/20) A - 85 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (16/20) A - 86 Fig. A6.4 VERTICAL SOUNDING LAYER ANALYSIS (17/20) A - 87 Fig. -
Rcdf Projects in Jinja District, Uganda
Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN JINJA DISTRICT, UGANDA MAP O F JINJA DIS TR ICT S HO W ING S UB CO U NTIES N B uw enge T C B uy engo B uta gaya B uw enge Bus ed de B udon do K ak ira Mafubira Mpum udd e/ K im ak a Masese/ Ce ntral wa lukub a Div ision 20 0 20 40 Kms UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....………3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……..………4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….……….…...4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……....5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Jinja district………………l….…….….5 2- Map of Uganda showing Jinja district………..………………….………………....…….14 10- Map of Jinja district showing sub counties………..…………………………………..15 11- Table showing the population of Jinja district by sub counties……………….15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Jinja District…………………………………….………..…..…16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1. Foreword ICTs are a key factor for socio-economic development. -
A Review of Land Tenure and Land Use Planning in the Six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda
A Review of Land Tenure and Land use Planning in the six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda BdBernard BhBashaas ha School of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University. Outline of Presentation Background Objective and Methodology Research Questions PliiPreliminary Fi Fidindings Land tenure structure Background KLKey Laws and regu lati ons rel ati ng t o th e ownership, management and transfer of land and re ltdlated resources i n Ug Uand a. The Constitution • The Land Act (1998), • The Land regulations of 2004 • The Physical planning Act of 2010. This act specifically provides for the design and implementation of land use plans. Background cont’d Other Relevant Laws: • The land acquisition Act, • The Water Act and associated water resources regulati on s, • The National Forestry and tree planting Act (2003), • The National Environment Regulations (2001), • The mortgage Act, • the registration of titles Act and the rent restriction Act. Objective & Methodology Object ive To achieve a deeper understanding of the land tenure structure andld land use p lanni ng i n th e six Kagera TAMP districts Highlight the constraints and identify the opportun ities f or pri ority it acti on. Methodology A combination of literature review and key informant interviews with district level staff. Research Questions What is the current land tenure structure and its distribution in Uganda and in the six districts of the Kagera TAMP project? What are the strategies and plans in place to improve the land tenure structure in Uganda and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts, in particular? Do land use plans exist at the National level and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts? HdhiildHow do the existing land use pl ans compare (i n content, design process (approach) and coordination arrangements) with best practices.