UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Voyager in Question: Histories of Travel, 1930-2010 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bq7p5cc Author Yoshioka-Maxwell, Olivia Chidori Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Voyager in Question: Histories of Travel, 1930-2010 By Olivia Chidori Yoshioka-Maxwell A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Suzanne Guerlac, Co-chair Professor Karl Britto, Co-chair Professor Tyler Stovall Spring 2014 The Voyager in Question: Histories of Travel, 1930-2010 Copyright 2014 By Olivia Chidori Yoshioka-Maxwell Abstract The Voyager in Question: Histories of Travel, 1930-2010 by Olivia Chidori Yoshioka-Maxwell Doctor of Philosophy in French University of California, Berkeley Professor Suzanne Guerlac and Professor Karl Britto, Co-Chairs This dissertation is situated within a field of cultural studies that seeks to develop a broader understanding of the political stakes of twentieth- and twenty-first century debates over who can travel. This line of inquiry responds to the persistent tendency in travel writing over the course of the century to exclude certain subjects in movement from the role of the traveler. The question, “What is travel?” is often treated in both literary texts and criticism as a philosophical or abstract question, stripped of its historical and political implications. I ask, what is the relationship between this effort to restrict the identity of the traveler and France’s imperialist history? How and why are non-European subjects denied the status of traveler, and how does the debate over the traveler / tourist binary, which has received more critical attention, relate to the reification of colonial and postcolonial subjects in the role of the “sedentary native”? Taking these questions as a point of departure, this dissertation explores how the theoretical opposition between the dynamic traveler and the passive travelee is constructed, undermined, and directly challenged in texts belonging to a wide variety of genres, from the historical novel to the Oulipian literary exercise to autofiction. The first part of the dissertation considers representations of travel at the “apogee” of the French Empire in the early 1930s. In Chapter One, I analyze how the 1931 Colonial Exposition, in framing a visit to the fair as a voyage around the world, both reifies the identity of the European visitor to the fair (indigenous to the metropole) as a traveler and reinforces the notion that the colonial subjects imported to perform the role of the “natives” at the fair (many of whom had traveled thousands of miles to reach Paris) could never occupy the role of the traveler. Chapter Two moves across genres to André Malraux’s adventure novel La voie royale (1930). I show how this modernist text—while continuing to exclude colonial subjects from the role of the traveler—nevertheless challenges the association of Europeans with dynamism and progress so central to the rhetoric of the mission civilisatrice. The second part of the dissertation analyzes texts from the last quarter of the century that reconfigure ideas of travel. In Chapter Three, I demonstrate how Maryse Condé’s two-volume historical novel Ségou (1984-85) challenges the myth of African ahistoricity that emerges from both colonial historiographies and certain Negritude discourses through its narration of histories 1 of travel in West Africa and throughout the Diaspora. In contrast to the representation of West African cultural spaces at the Exposition through an essentialized, monolithic architecture, the figure of the city in Ségou is a site of cultural exchange and hybridity. Chapter Four turns to two works published during the mid-1970s: a watershed moment for the history of tourism and immigration in the twentieth century. I juxtapose Georges Perec’s Tentative d’épuisement d’un lieu parisien (1975)—an account of several days spent sitting in the Place Saint-Sulpice—with Rachid Boudjedra’s Topographie idéale pour une agression caractérisée (1975), which narrates an unnamed emigrant’s struggle to navigate the subterranean labyrinth of the Paris metro. I explore how Perec’s encounters with tourists circulating through the Place Saint-Sulpice can shed light on the ways in which native Parisians respond to the presence of Boudjedra’s protagonist in the metropolitan capital. In both texts, interactions between Parisians and travelers to Paris are shaped by the natives’ anxiety over the perceived globalization of mobility in the 1970s. In Chapter Five, I examine a pair of texts representing urban itineraries in the French capital at the turn of the century: Bessora’s 53 cm (1999) and Patrick Modiano’s Dora Bruder (1999). By reimagining Paris as a site of travel, the location of multiple histories and cultures, the texts read in this last chapter fundamentally undermine the oppositions between “here” and “elsewhere,” home and abroad, traveler and native, and more broadly speaking, between travel and dwelling, which have defined colonial and neocolonial ideas of travel throughout the twentieth century. Finally, in the Afterword, I suggest how an approach to travel literature structured around close attention to historical context can inform contemporary debates over the disciplinary boundaries of French / Francophone Studies. 2 For Dad and Mabs i Table of Contents Dedication i Table of Contents ii Acknowledgements iii Introduction iv The Traveler’s Other Other: Critical Re-negotiations of Travel in the Twentieth Century Chapter One The 1931 Exposition Coloniale de Paris and its Travelers 1 Chapter Two White Men and Medusas: Arrested Motion in André Malraux’s La voie royale 29 Chapter Three Murailles / chemin: Cultures of Travel and Dwelling in Maryse Condé’s Ségou 54 Chapter Four Photophages / Lotophages: Tourism, Migration, and Proximate Ethnography in 1970s Paris 81 Chapter Five Race, National Identity, and Bureaucratic Alterity in Patrick Modiano’s Dora Bruder and Bessora’s 53 cm 108 Afterword 120 References 123 ii Acknowledgments I am endlessly grateful to my co-directors, Suzanne Guerlac and Karl Britto, for their incredible support and guidance; it would be impossible to fully recognize all that I have learned from them. Many thanks to Tyler Stovall, whose mind-opening seminar on “French Colonialism” began to shape my research interests in the earliest days of grad school. I would also like to express my gratitude to the many teachers, friends, and colleagues who have shared their knowledge and offered support throughout this process: the professors and graduate students who attended my Work in Progress talks and extended thoughtful advice and feedback; Timothy Hampton, for his support and brilliant teaching, and for expanding my knowledge of Rabelais beyond The Music Man; Debarati Sanyal, whose recommendation of texts by Perec and Modiano allowed me to see Parisian urban spaces in new and exciting ways; Eglantine Colon, for her valuable help in articulating the links between different chapters; Zack Geballe, thanks to whom the rush to the finish line was surprisingly delightful; Chelsea Collonge, my Plymouth Rock; Toby Warner, for sharing his intricate knowledge of the ANOM; the members of the Francophone Studies Working Group, especially Caitlin Scholl, Sarah Johnson, and Amanda Leonard, for their intellectual verve and skillful editing; my Dwinelle comrades—Sokrat Postoli, Elyse Ritchey, Juan Caballero, Mike Arrigo, Corine Stofle, Billy Heidenfelt, Matthew Evans, Brock Imel, Matt Smith, and many more—for the pop culture interludes, advice, peer-editing!, and occasional intellectual exchange; Travis Wilds, for sharing my passion for taxonomy and the Jardin des Plantes; Maïa Beyler-Noily, for her humor, faith, and for betting it all; Celine Piser, whose generous feedback and unflagging enthusiasm sustained me through many swamps of sadness dotting the grad school landscape; Linda Louie, GD, for her friendship and expert puzzling, and for being the Ariadne to my analytical labyrinth; Anna Skrzypczynska, for her graceful erudition and puns; Jonathon Repinecz, my Book! of Gibraltar, for his dignity and the brilliant and generous feedback; Maya Smith, for her boundless intellectual and emotional support, and for our academic adventures, past, present, and future (may we ever defy the drop- down menu!); the wholly amazing colleagues in my writing group, for putting professionalism and prose before all else: Margo Meyer, who held the light at the end of the tunnel; Stacey Battis, my cherished sister-in-travel and punctuation queen; and Maria Vendetti, my Academic Coach, for her encouragement, example, and wit. Excelsior! My most long-standing debt is to Carol Dolcini, who convinced a freshman that pursuing French Studies was a solid investment in the future, and who has supported me ever since. Mary Ajideh’s gracious guidance sustained me through many years of this difficult process. To my family: my aunties Claudia Nakamura and Kay Higa, my beloved grandmothers, and many, many others whose faith kept me going; my grandfather, for whom I endeavored to study hard; Bonnie Maxwell and Gary Wheeler, for their support, encouragement, and humor; Amanda Yoshioka-Maxwell, my sister and role model; and my brother Seth, who speaks my language