DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Program November 6–9, 2014 Chicago Hilton & Towers | Chicago, IL USA Meeting Program www.asdp.org/AM14 #ASDP2014 Chicago Hilton and Towers Mini Course First Floor Young Physicians’ Reception Second Floor Registration/ASDP Art Show/Posters/ Dermatopathology Bookstore/ ASDP Career Center Short Courses/Young Physicians’ Forum/ Duel in Dermatopathology/Basic Science Course/ Helwig Lecture/Fellows’ Case Presentations/ Evening Slide Symposium/Oral Abstract Sessions Self-Assessment Discussion/ Membership Business Meeting and Luncheon Evening Slide Symposium Preview Consultations in Dermatopathology Third Floor Speaker Ready Room Self-Assessment in Dermatopathology/ ASDP Quality and Performance Improvement Program/Slide Library Meeting Program Table of Contents General Information General General .......................................................................4 – 14 Information Information Faculty Disclosures .......................................................................10 – 11 2014 Founders’ and Nickel Award Recipients ...............................12 – 13 Corporate Partners and Sponsors......................................................... 14 Program-at-a-Glance ...................................................................15 – 22 Glance Plenary Program ..........................................................................23 – 51 Program-at-a- Thursday, November 6 .............................................................23 – 31 Friday, November 7 ..................................................................32 – 37 Saturday, November 8 .............................................................38 – 47 Thursday, Sunday, November 9 ...............................................................48 – 51 November 6 Optional Courses & Events ........................................................52 – 64 Consultations in Dermatopathology ........................................52 – 56 Mini-Course: Soft Tissue Pathology .........................................57 – 58 Friday, Self-Assessment in Dermatopathology ....................................59 – 61 November 7 ASDP Quality and Performance Improvement Program .........62 – 63 President’s Reception & Banquet .................................................. 64 Index of Faculty ..............................................................................66 – 68 Saturday, November 8 2014 Program Committee Noreen M.G. Walsh, MD, FRCP(c), Ronald P. Rapini, MD FRCPath, Chair University of Texas Medical School Sunday, Dalhousie University, Halifax and MD Anderson Cancer November 9 Klaus J. Busam, MD Center Memorial Sloan-Kettering Tammie C. Ferringer, MD Cancer Center Geisinger Medical Center Steven D. Billings, MD & Events Cleveland Clinic Optional Courses Index of Faculty #ASDP2014 www.asdp.org/AM14 3 The American Society of Dermatopathology General Information Continuing Medical Education The American Society of Dermatopathology is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical edu- cation for physicians. The American Society of Dermatopathology designates this live activity for a maximum of 35 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. The American Society of Dermatopathology Annual Meeting (Program #254100) is recognized by the American Academy of Dermatology for 35 AAD Recog- nized Credits and may be used toward the American Academy of Dermatology’s Continuing Medical Education Award. Continuing Medical Education Policy The American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) is accredited by the Ac- creditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). As such, we are required to meet the ACCME’s expectations for our practice of continuing medical education. It is the policy of the ASDP to ensure balance, independence, objectivity and scientific rigor in all of its educational activities. Faculty participating in and plan- ning the Annual Meeting must comply with all procedures governing disclosure. The ASDP has implemented a process where everyone in a position to control the content of an educational activity will present evidence-based content, disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest and dis- cussion of unlabeled/investigational uses of a commercial product. In addition, presentations must be free of commercial bias and any information regarding commercial products/services must be based on scientific methods generally accepted by the medical community. Conflicts were resolved prior to this edu- cational activity. Faculty who refused to disclose relevant financial relationships and discussion of unlabeled/investigational uses of a commercial product would have been disqualified from being a part of the planning and implementation of this CME activity. Presenters who qualified for the implementation of this activity are required to verbally disclose to the audience, immediately prior to the scientific presenta- tion, any of the relationships mentioned above. Faculty relationships are also disclosed to audiences in this program book. 4 www.asdp.org/AM14 #ASDP2014 Meeting Program CME Claims and Verification of Attendance New This Year! Attendees will be able to claim their CME credits online via General the ASDP website after the meeting. You must submit your CME credit online Information in order to receive appropriate CME credit. The number of CME credit avail- able for each course is indicated by the course title in this program and on the online CME submission site. An official CME certificate will be available to print immediately after completing the online CME claim form and evaluation. Paper certificates will no longer be mailed. Appropriate credit for attendance should be ascertained and reported by individual physicians to the particular state or medical society to which he/she belongs. For those registered in the AAD CME Transcript/Award Program, you should log in to the AAD Online CME Transcript Program to enter credits for this AAD Recognized program. ASDP’s AAD program number is 254100. MOC Claims and Verification MOC credit for the Self-Assessment in Dermatopathology sessions will not be included on the Annual Meeting CME Certificates. Participants must complete the post-course online self-assessment with a 50 percent pass rate or better in order to claim MOC credit for Self-Assessment in Dermatopathology. A MOC certificate will be available to print upon successful completion of the post- course online self-assessment. MOC credit for the ASDP Quality and Performance Improvement Program will not be included on the ASDP Annual Meeting CME Certificates. Participants must complete the follow-up survey six months after completion of the Quality and Performance Improvement Program at the annual meeting. MOC certificates will be available to print immediately upon completion of the follow-up survey. #ASDP2014 www.asdp.org/AM14 5 The American Society of Dermatopathology Learning Objectives The educational mission of the American Society of Dermatopathology is to teach, aid in the dissemination of knowledge and encourage research to improve the quality of the practice of dermatopathology. The annual meeting is primarily an educational one, offering members, fellows, residents and medical students lectures on current topics in dermatopathology, interactive sessions at the microscope, a self-assessment course, and opportunities for poster and abstract presentations. After attending the 2014 Annual Meeting, participants should be able to: • Develop overall diagnostic skills in dermatopathology following exposure to clinical and histopathological aspects of a broad range of dermatologic diseases. • Describe recent advances in diagnosing soft tissue pathology and their impact on the practice of dermatopathology. • Diagnose a wide range of challenging areas of dermatopathology, such as the pathology of the nail and hair follicle/alopecia, and develop a practical approach to handling such cases. • Evaluate relevance and appropriate utilization of innovative diagnostic tools in the investigation of inflammatory and neoplastic dermatopathology cases. • Identify molecular tests for diagnosis and prognosis of cutaneous neo- plasms with emphasis on melanocytic, hematopoietic and soft tissue tumors. • Utilize sophisticated technology in the realm of dermatopathology through an informed and fiscally responsible approach. • Outline new scientific dermatopathologic endeavors and discoveries, con- veyed by junior and senior colleagues involved in research. • Identify the challenges and rewards of an academic career in dermato- pathology through exposure to relevant role models and establishment of fruitful professional connections. • Identify national policies relevant to the practice of dermatopathology and gain awareness of how professionals in the field can influence decision making. • Demonstrate an approach toward diagnosis of various challenging skin biopsies and generate relevant differential diagnoses. 6 www.asdp.org/AM14 #ASDP2014 Meeting Program Poster Presentations International South Ballroom, 2nd Floor General 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CME CreditTM Information 1 AAD Recognized Credit Participants will earn .5 CME credit for each Poster Defense Session attended. Basic research, practical techniques and new clinical or histopathologic entities will be presented in this traditional and popular format. Posters will be on display in two poster sessions Thursday afternoon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE a Clinical and Histopathological Study of Lichenoid Eruption of Skin in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals of Dhaka
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Clinical and Histopathological study of Lichenoid Eruption of Skin in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals of Dhaka. Khaled A1, Banu SG 2, Kamal M 3, Manzoor J 4, Nasir TA 5 Introduction studies from other countries. Skin diseases manifested by lichenoid eruption, With this background, this present study was is common in our country. Patients usually undertaken to know the clinical and attend the skin disease clinic in advanced stage histopathological pattern of lichenoid eruption, of disease because of improper treatment due to age and sex distribution of the diseases and to difficulties in differentiation of myriads of well assess the clinical diagnostic accuracy by established diseases which present as lichenoid histopathology. eruption. When we call a clinical eruption lichenoid, we Materials and Method usually mean it resembles lichen planus1, the A total of 134 cases were included in this study prototype of this group of disease. The term and these cases were collected from lichenoid used clinically to describe a flat Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University topped, shiny papular eruption resembling 2 (Jan 2003 to Feb 2005) and Apollo Hospitals lichen planus. Histopathologically these Dhaka (Oct 2006 to May 2008), both of these are diseases show lichenoid tissue reaction. The large tertiary care hospitals in Dhaka. Biopsy lichenoid tissue reaction is characterized by specimen from patients of all age group having epidermal basal cell damage that is intimately lichenoid eruption was included in this study. associated with massive infiltration of T cells in 3 Detailed clinical history including age, sex, upper dermis. distribution of lesions, presence of itching, The spectrum of clinical diseases related to exacerbating factors, drug history, family history lichenoid tissue reaction is wider and usually and any systemic manifestation were noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Eruptions- When to Worry
    3/17/2017 Drug reactions: Drug Eruptions‐ When to Worry 3 things you need to know 1. Type of drug reaction 2. Statistics: – Which drugs are most likely to cause that type of Lindy P. Fox, MD reaction? Associate Professor 3. Timing: Director, Hospital Consultation Service – How long after the drug started did the reaction Department of Dermatology University of California, San Francisco begin? [email protected] I have no conflicts of interest to disclose 1 Drug Eruptions: Common Causes of Cutaneous Drug Degrees of Severity Eruptions • Antibiotics Simple Complex • NSAIDs Morbilliform drug eruption Drug hypersensitivity reaction Stevens-Johnson syndrome •Sulfa (SJS) Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) • Allopurinol Minimal systemic symptoms Systemic involvement • Anticonvulsants Potentially life threatening 1 3/17/2017 Morbilliform (Simple) Drug Eruption Morbilliform (Simple) Drug Eruption Per the drug chart, the most likely culprit is: Per the drug chart, the most likely culprit is: Day Day Day ‐> ‐8 ‐7 ‐6 ‐5 ‐4 ‐3 ‐2 ‐1 0 1 Day ‐> ‐8 ‐7 ‐6 ‐5 ‐4 ‐3 ‐2 ‐1 0 1 A vancomycin x x x x A vancomycin x x x x B metronidazole x x B metronidazole x x C ceftriaxone x x x C ceftriaxone x x x D norepinephrine x x x D norepinephrine x x x E omeprazole x x x x E omeprazole x x x x F SQ heparin x x x x F SQ heparin x x x x trimethoprim/ trimethoprim/ G xxxxxxx G xxxxxxx sulfamethoxazole sulfamethoxazole Admit day Rash onset Admit day Rash onset Morbilliform (Simple) Drug Eruption Drug Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome • Begins 5‐10 days after drug started
    [Show full text]
  • Psoriasiform Drug Eruption Induced by Anti-Tuberculosis Medication: Potential Role of Plasma­ Cytoid Dendritic Cells
    Letters to the Editor 305 Psoriasiform Drug Eruption Induced by Anti-tuberculosis Medication: Potential Role of Plasma- cytoid Dendritic Cells Jae-Jeong Park1, Yoo Duk Choi2, Jee-Bum Lee1, Seong-Jin Kim1, Seung-Chul Lee1, Young Ho Won1 and Sook Jung Yun1* Departments of 1Dermatology and 2Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. *E mail: [email protected] Accepted November 23, 2009. Psoriasiform drug eruptions can be induced by several one month earlier, and treated with bicalutamide and tamsulosin drugs (1). Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease hydrochloride, which were started one week after the skin eruption began. The skin lesions spread from his arms to the trunk and lower characterized by T-cell-mediated cytokine production extremities. On physical examination, erythematous papulosqua- that drives the hyperproliferation and abnormal differen- mous lesions were found, scattered on his trunk, arms, hands, legs, tiation of keratinocytes (2). Drugs can cause new lesions and buttocks (Fig. 1). Other than an elevated eosinophil count (731/ when there is no history or family history of psoriasis. mm3, normal range 0–483/mm3; 10.6%, normal range 0–7%) and Based on the psoriatic drug eruption probability score, IgE level (361 IU/ml, normal range 0–100 IU/ml), the laboratory findings were within normal limits, including a complete blood β‑blockers, synthetic anti‑malaria drugs, non‑steroidal cell count, liver and renal function tests, and urinalysis. Syphilis anti‑inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), lithium, digoxin, and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) and Treponema tetracycline antibiotics are relevant in psoriasis (1, 3–5).
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Eruptions
    DRUG ERUPTIONS http://www.aocd.org A drug eruption is an adverse skin reaction to a drug. Many medications can cause reactions, especially antimicrobial agents, sulfa drugs, NSAIDs, chemotherapy agents, anticonvulsants, and psychotropic drugs. Drug eruptions can imitate a variety of other skin conditions and therefore should be considered in any patient taking medications or that has changed medications. The onset of drug eruptions is usually within 2 weeks of beginning a new drug or within days if it is due to re-exposure to a certain drug. Itching is the most common symptom. Drug eruptions occur in approximately 2-5% of hospitalized patients and in greater than 1% of the outpatient population. Adverse reactions to drugs are more prevalent in women, in the elderly, and in immunocompromised patients. Drug eruptions may be immunologically or non-immunologically mediated. There are 4 types of immunologically mediated reactions, with Type IV being the most common. Type I is immunoglobulin-E dependent and can result in anaphylaxis, angioedema, and urticaria. Type II is cytotoxic and can result in purpura. Type III reactions are immune complex reactions which can result in vasculitis and type IV is a delayed-type reaction which results in contact dermatitis and photoallergic reactions. This is important as different medications are associated with different types of reactions. For example, insulin is related with type I reactions whereas penicillin, cephalosporins, and sulfonamides cause type II reactions. Quinines and salicylates can cause type III reactions and topical medications such as neomycin can cause type IV reactions. The most common drugs that may potentially cause drug eruptions include amoxicillin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, penicillin, cephalosporins, quinidine and gentamicin sulfate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Approach to Superficial Inflammatory Dermatoses K O Alsaad, D Ghazarian
    1233 J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.2005.027151 on 25 November 2005. Downloaded from REVIEW My approach to superficial inflammatory dermatoses K O Alsaad, D Ghazarian ............................................................................................................................... J Clin Pathol 2005;58:1233–1241. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.027151 Superficial inflammatory dermatoses are very common and diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases, there are limitations to this approach. The size of the comprise a wide, complex variety of clinical conditions. skin biopsy should be adequate and representa- Accurate histological diagnosis, although it can sometimes tive of all four compartments and should also be difficult to establish, is essential for clinical include hair follicles. A 2 mm punch biopsy is too small to represent all compartments, and often management. Knowledge of the microanatomy of the skin insufficient to demonstrate a recognisable pat- is important to recognise the variable histological patterns tern. A 4 mm punch biopsy is preferred, and of inflammatory skin diseases. This article reviews the non- usually adequate for the histological evaluation of most inflammatory dermatoses. However, a vesiculobullous/pustular inflammatory superficial larger biopsy (6 mm punch biopsy), or even an dermatoses based on the compartmental microanatomy of incisional biopsy, might be necessary in panni- the skin. culitis or cutaneous lymphoproliferative disor- ders. A superficial or shave biopsy should be ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Eruption
    Drug eruption March 25,2015 Outline • Clinical features • Pathogenesis • How to approach? • Management? Need to know • Urticaria • Exanthematous rash • DRESS • Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TEN • Fix drug eruptions • Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis • Photoallergic/Phototoxic. • Chemotherapy induced.. Generalized erythematous and slightly edematous maculopapular rashes Erythema and edema of face and periorbital area Investigations 28/8/47 30/8/47 2/9//47 Total 1110 1690 2024 Eosinophil SGOT 42 98 69 SGPT 130 108 88 Your Dx is D R E S S ? Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms DRESS • Aromatic antiepileptic agents (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital) • Sulfonamides, allopurinol, gold salts, dapsone, and minocycline. 5 days after prednisolone 30mg/d 5 days after prednisolone 30mg/d Gout after 2 weeks of allopurinol Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis from allopurinol Approach to the Acute Generalized Blistering Patient History : Onset ,underlying disease, New Drug ,other symptoms? ( fever,sore throat ) Physical examination : target lesion nikolsky sign, epidermal necrolysis, mucosal involvement Investigation : baseline lab,skin biopsy + Direct Immonofluorescence Differential diagnosis of TEN • SSSS (Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome ) • Autoimmune blistering disease ( pemphigus,linear IgA dermatosis.. ) • Erythema multiforme Generalized exanthem Blistering ,denudation Generalized Cutaneous tenderness Nikolsky sign + desquamation Apoptosis desmoglein-1 TEN SSSS Pemphigus vulgaris Bullous pemphigoid Erythema multiforme Take
    [Show full text]
  • UC Davis Dermatology Online Journal
    UC Davis Dermatology Online Journal Title Morbilliform eruption related to eltrombopag: emerging data on the cutaneous toxicity of thrombopoietin receptor agonists Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pk3534w Journal Dermatology Online Journal, 22(6) Authors Kazemi, Tiana Martin, Sabrina Worswick, Scott Publication Date 2016 DOI 10.5070/D3226031325 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Volume 22 Number 6 June 2016 Case presentation Morbilliform eruption related to eltrombopag: emerging data on the cutaneous toxicity of thrombopoietin receptor agonists Tiana Kazemi BA1, Sabrina Martin MD2, Scott Worswick MD2 Dermatology Online Journal 22 (6): 13 1 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 2 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Correspondence: Scott Worswick 200 Medical Plaza Suite 450 Los Angeles CA, 90095 Tel. (310) 917-3376 [email protected] Abstract Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin mimetic used for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, hepatitis C patients undergoing antiviral therapy, and thrombocytopenia secondary to aplastic anemia that is refractory to immunosuppressive therapy. We report a case of a 25-year-old man with a history of aplastic anemia who presented with fever and a monomorphic papular rash. Subsequent labs, biopsy, and clinical course favored drug-induced cutaneous toxicity, with eltrombopag as the likely culprit. Eltrombopag is generally well-tolerated; however, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of dose-independent drug-induced cutaneous toxicity with this medication. This report reviews the mechanism and use of eltrombopag along with a summary of associated adverse cutaneous reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Psoriasiform Drug Eruption Secondary to Sorafenib: Case Series and Review of the Literature
    CASE REPORT Psoriasiform Drug Eruption Secondary to Sorafenib: Case Series and Review of the Literature Courtney J. Ensslin, MD; Pei-han Kao, MD; Ming-ying Wu, MD; Yao-yu Chang, MD; Tseng-tong Kuo, MD, PhD; Chia-hsun Hsieh, MD, MS; Sen-yung Hsieh, MD, PhD; Chih-hsun Yang, MD; Lloyd S. Miller, MD, PhD he expanded use of targeted anticancer agents PRACTICE POINTS such as sorafenibcopy has revealed a growing spec- • The use of targeted anticancer agents continues T trum of adverse cutaneous eruptions. We describe to expand. With this expansion, the number and 3 patients with sorafenib-induced psoriasiform dermatitis type of cutaneous adverse events continues and review the literature of only 10 other similar reported to increase. cases based on a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and • Although sorafenib is known to cause various Americannot Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts using the dermatologic side effects, there are few reports of terms psoriasis or psoriasiform dermatitis and sorafenib.1-10 psoriasiform dermatitis. We seek to increase awareness of this particular drug • Increased awareness of sorafenib-induced pso- Doeruption in response to sorafenib and to describe poten- riasiform dermatitis and its management is vital to tial effective treatment options, especially when sorafenib prevent discontinuation of potentially life-saving anti- cannot be discontinued. cancer therapy. Case Reports Patient 1—A 68-year-old man with chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was started The expanding use of novel targeted anticancer agents such as sorafenib has led to an increasing number of dermatologic on sorafenib 400 mg daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: a Paradigm for Bedside-To-Bench Patient-Oriented Translational Clinical Investigation
    Arch Dermatol Res (2009) 301:65–70 DOI 10.1007/s00403-008-0890-x REVIEW Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a paradigm for bedside-to-bench patient-oriented translational clinical investigation Richard D. Sontheimer Æ Clifford L. Henderson Æ Renee H. Grau Received: 15 August 2008 / Accepted: 22 August 2008 / Published online: 17 September 2008 Ó Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract At least 71 patients have been reported in which blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, their otherwise typical subacute cutaneous lupus erythe- beta-blockers). An approach to the management of DI- matosus (SCLE) skin lesions were felt to have been SCLE is presented. Ro/SS-A autoantibodies tended to temporally associated with the systemic administration of a remain present in the blood after resolution of drug-induced drug. The mean age of this cohort of drug-induced SCLE SCLE skin lesions. A common link between the disparate (DI-SCLE) patients was 59 years of age which is somewhat group of drug structures implicated in triggering SCLE is older than the mean age of previously reported idiopathic their tendencies to produce photosensitivity and lichenoid SCLE patient cohorts. Patients had been taking the sus- drug reactions. This leads to the speculation that DI-SCLE pected triggering drug for weeks to years before the onset of could represent a photo-induced isomorphic/Ko¨ebner SCLE skin lesions. In addition, it was not unusual for 2– response in an immunogenetically predisposed host. 3 months to be required for resolution of the SCLE skin lesions following discontinuation of the triggering drug. A Keywords relatively large number of drugs representing different Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus Á pharmacological classes have been implicated in the Bedside-to-bench patient-oriented translational clinical induction of SCLE.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Eruptions by the Numbers
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY SKIN DISEASE BRIEFS Drug eruptions by the numbers Drug eruptions are among 24 skin diseases or disease categories examined in the Burden of Skin Disease report commissioned by the American Academy of Dermatology. The report examined prevalence, economic burdens, and mortality for skin disease in the U.S. using 2013 health care claims data drawn from insurance enrollment and claims databases and found that: • 84.5 million Americans — one in four — were impacted by skin disease; 50% of them are over 65 and have an average of 2.2 skin conditions. • Skin disease cost the U.S. healthcare system $75 billion in medical, preventative, and prescription and non-prescription drug costs. • One in three Americans with skin disease were seen by a dermatologist, who collaborate with other physicians throughout the health care system in caring for these patients. Drug eruptions on the skin primarily affected children and young adults, with those age 44 or younger accounting for approximately 62% of the more than 773,000 Americans who sought medical treatment in 2013. Drug eruptions: • Cost patients an average of nearly $343 in 2013, surpassing the cost per patient for vitiligo, pruritus and urticaria combined, and non-cancerous skin growths. • Cost the health care system a total of $266 million and resulted in lost productivity costs of $44 million in 2013. • Caused more than 100 deaths in 2013, with patients lives potentially shortened by 11 years due to the disease. The charts that follow provide topline data on how drug eruptions contribute to the overall burden of skin disease.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Side Effect Seen Due to the Use of Apixaban: Palmoplantar Psoriasiform Drug Eruption
    Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 212-5 Case Reports 213 with “normal” P waves on ECG. P-wave morphology is usually 4. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Ferrari R. Ivabradine for patients similar or identical to sinus rhythm. In general, IST is a diagno- with stable coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic sis made by exclusion. The treatment for IST has been limited dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a randomized, double- blind, placebo- to calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, antiarrhythmic controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372 :807-16. 5. Mason PK, Di Marco JP. New pharmacological agents for arrhyth- drugs, and sometimes, radiofrequency ablation. Although mias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2: 588-97. metoprolol, verapamil, and digoxin were used in maximum 6. Rakovec P. Treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia with iva- doses in our patient, the control of HR was not achieved and bradine. Wien Klin Wochensch 2009; 121: 716-8. LVEF deteriorated each day, which led to the development of 7. Babic Z, Gabric ID, Pintaric H. Successful primary percutaneous symptomatic HF. coronary intervention in the first trimester of pregnancy. Catheter The most popular choice for patients with drug-refractory Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 522–5. IST is sinus node modification using radiofrequency ablation (2, 8. Winum PF, Cayla G, Rubini M, Beck L, Messner-Pellenc P. A case of cardiomyopathy induced by inappropriate sinus tachycardia 3). However, our patient did not agree to undergo the procedure and cured by ivabradine. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009; 32: because of risks such as ionizing radiation, phrenic nerve injury, 942-4. requirement for permanent pacing, and pericarditis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Chronic Lichenoid Dermatitis Manifesting As Hypopigmented, Flat-Topped Papules
    A case of chronic lichenoid dermatitis manifesting as hypopigmented, flat-topped papules Ann Mazor Reed, DO,* Jennifer David, DO,** Stanley Skopit, DO, MSE, FAOCD*** * Dermatology resident, 2nd year, NSU-COM/Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, FL ** Dermatology resident, 1st year, NSU-COM/Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, FL *** Program Director, Dermatology Residency, NSU-COM/Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, FL Abstract We report a case of a 65-year-old African American female with chronic lichenoid dermatitis that manifested as hypopigmented, flat-topped papules. The lesions were initially thought to be flat warts based on their clinical appearance. Histology of a lesion revealed resolving lichenoid dermatitis with some features suggesting a possible histological differential diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. However, molecular studies showed oligoclonal results, which was insufficient to meet the criteria of a clonal process. We present a possible new subtype of lichen planus, the hypopigmented variant. After previous therapy with topical corticosteroid cream, our patient improved with clobetasol ointment twice daily, an intramuscular triamcinolone injection and narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) three times a week for six weeks. Introduction for this condition included a “steroid cream” with features raised the possibility of a histological Lichen planus (LP) is an idiopathic inflammatory no improvement. The patient’s past medical and differential diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell disease of the skin, nails, hair, and mucous surgical history were non-contributory. She had lymphoma. However, molecular studies showed 1 no known drug or environmental allergies and oligoclonal results, which was insufficient to meet membranes. The pathogenesis and etiology of denied taking any medications, including over- the criteria of a clonal process.
    [Show full text]