1 United States of America Before The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 United States of America Before The 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, ) ) Docket No. EL16-___-000 Complainant, ) ) v. ) ) Entergy Texas, Inc. ) ) Respondent. ) COMPLAINT OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AGAINST ENTERGY TEXAS, INC., REQUEST FOR FAST TRACK PROCESSING, REQUEST FOR SHORTENED ANSWER PERIOD, AND MOTION FOR STAY Pursuant to Section 306 of the Federal Power Act,1 the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (“PURPA”),2 Section 206 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”),3 and Section 292.303 of the Commission’s regulations,4 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear,” or “Complainant”) submits this Complaint against Entergy Texas, Inc. (“ETI”). For the reasons set forth below, Complainant requests that the Commission process this Complaint utilizing Fast Track procedures in accordance with Rule 206(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure5 and issue an order (1) granting the Complaint and (2) finding that ETI’s proposed termination of the Agreement for 1 16 U.S.C. § 825e (2012). 2 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3(a). 3 18 C.F.R. § 385.206 (2016). 4 18 C.F.R. § 292.303. 5 18 C.F.R. § 385.206(h). 1 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM Purchased Power between Goodyear and ETI (the “PPA”)6 is contrary to ETI’s obligation to purchase energy and capacity from Goodyear pursuant to Section 292.303 of Commission’s regulations7 implementing PURPA, and the Commission’s January 21, 2016, order (“January 21 Order”) granting, in part, ETI’s application to terminate its mandatory purchase obligation.8 As further set forth below, ETI acknowledged in its Commission filings requesting the January 21 Order that the Goodyear qualifying facility (“QF”) subject to the PPA is an under-20 MW QF from which ETI remains obligated to purchase energy and capacity. However, ETI now seeks to revise its position after the January 21 Order issued and to improperly terminate the PPA; Goodyear respectfully requests an order granting this Complaint and preventing such termination. In addition, in the event the Commission does not issue an order granting the relief requested in the Complaint on or before August 31, 2016, Goodyear requests the Commission stay ETI’s proposed termination of the sales of QF energy by Goodyear described herein until such time as either (1) the Complaint is granted or (2) the Complaint is denied and Goodyear has had a reasonable opportunity to register with the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”) and enter into alternate arrangements for the sale of Goodyear’s QF energy in MISO. 6 The Agreement for Purchase of Energy from Qualifying Facilities was originally between Goodyear and Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (formerly Gulf States Utilities), and dated December 10, 1999, but fully executed as of December 14, 1999. ETI is the successor-in-interest to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. under the PPA. The PPA is provided herewith in confidential Attachment 1. The PPA contains privileged and confidential information consisting of commercial arrangements between Goodyear and ETI, and Goodyear respectfully requests that Attachment 1 be treated as confidential subject to the protective order provided herewith as Attachment 9. 7 Id. 8 Entergy Services, Inc., et al., 154 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2016) (“January 21 Order”). The application was filed by Entergy Services, Inc. on behalf of ETI and other subsidiaries; this complaint refers to the application as being filed by ETI. 2 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM I. SUMMARY Complainant and ETI are parties to a PPA pursuant to which ETI purchases QF energy from Goodyear as required by PURPA and the Commission’s rules and regulations implementing PURPA. On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order granting ETI’s September 29, 2014, application seeking to terminate, on a service territory-wide basis, the requirement imposed on ETI under PURPA and the Commission’s implementing rules and regulations to enter into new power purchase obligations or contracts to purchase electric energy and capacity from QFs and small power production facilities with a net capacity in excess of 20 MW. While ETI was thus relieved of its obligation to purchase energy and capacity from QFs with a net capacity in excess of 20 MW, the January 21 Order did not relieve ETI of its statutory obligation to purchase energy and capacity from QFs like Goodyear’s with a net capacity of 20 MW or less. Goodyear has engaged in multiple communications with ETI to inform ETI of Goodyear’s position that the net capacity of the Goodyear QF at issue is less than 20 MW and thus the January 21 order is not applicable to the PPA. Nevertheless, on June 1, 2016, ETI notified Goodyear of its unwarranted and therefore unexpected intent to terminate the PPA effective September 1, 2016, “in light of” the relief granted by the Commission in the January 21 Order.9 Goodyear now files this Complaint with the Commission to remedy ETI’s erroneous interpretation and application of the Commission’s order as relieving ETI of the obligation to purchase energy and capacity from Goodyear. In addition, at this point there is insufficient time for Goodyear to 9 The June 1, 2016, notice of termination, which was received by Goodyear on June 6, 2016, is included herewith as Attachment 7. 3 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM register with MISO and obtain Commission authorizations required in order to sell energy to other counterparties as of September 1.10 Accordingly, Goodyear seeks Fast Track processing of this Complaint pursuant to the Commission’s regulations and the issuance of an order on the Complaint on or before August 31, 2016. Finally, in the event the Commission does not issue an order granting the Complaint on or before August 31, 2016, Goodyear requests the Commission issue a stay of the application of its January 21 Order to sales of QF energy by Goodyear until such time as either (1) the Complaint is granted or (2) the Complaint is denied and Goodyear has had a reasonable opportunity to register with MISO and enter into alternate arrangements for the sale of Goodyear’s QF energy into MISO. II. COMMUNICATIONS Communications regarding this Complaint should be directed to the following individuals: John S. Decker Damien R. Lyster Vinson & Elkins LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20037-1701 Tel: (202) 639-6599 [email protected] 10 As explained further below, due to the timing of the unexpected attempt by ETI to terminate the PPA, Goodyear is unable to become a participant in the MISO markets until December 1, 2016, at the earliest. 4 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES A. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Complainant) The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business located at 200 Innovation Way, Akron, Ohio 44316-0001. Goodyear is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of tires, engaging in operations in most regions of the world. As further explained herein, Goodyear owns and operates a chemical plant located in Beaumont, Texas, that produces synthetic rubber. As further explained below, the Beaumont plant is served by two QFs owned and operated by Goodyear: a cogeneration facility self-certified as a QF in Commission Docket No. QF87-116-000 and a separate cogeneration facility self-certified as a QF in Commission Docket No. QF99- 85-000. Goodyear’s Beaumont chemical plant and QFs are located within the area served by Entergy Texas, Inc. B. Entergy Texas, Inc. (Respondent) Entergy Texas, Inc. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business located at 350 Pine Street, Beaumont, Texas, 77701. ETI is a vertically integrated electric utility located in the MISO regional transmission organization market and provides wholesale and retail electric power service in Texas, including Beaumont where Complainant’s QFs are located. Specifically, ETI is the successor-in-interest to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (formerly Gulf States Utilities) under the PPA. ETI is a subsidiary and utility operating company of Entergy Corporation, which is an electric utility holding 5 20160809-5208 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/9/2016 4:07:59 PM company that consists of, in part, the Entergy Operating Companies11 and various service and support subsidiaries, including Entergy Services, Inc. (“ESI”). IV. BACKGROUND A. Goodyear QFs Goodyear owns and operates The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Chemical Plant in Beaumont, Texas, which produces a portion of Goodyear’s global synthetic rubber requirements. The Beaumont plant consists of the original western portion of the plant and, as discussed below, the Beaumont/East expansion. In addition, Goodyear owns and operates two QFs, a cogeneration facility self-certified as a QF in Commission Docket No. QF87-11612 (the “1987 Beaumont/West QF”) and a separate cogeneration facility self-certified as a QF in Commission Docket No. QF99-8513 (the “1999 Beaumont/East QF”). As explained in the 1987 Beaumont/West QF Self-certification, the 1987 Beaumont/West QF includes multiple direct-fired boilers that produce steam for use in Goodyear’s west chemical facility at Beaumont, Texas. Steam is delivered from the boilers, through a turbine, and on to the chemical plant for use in heat exchangers for hydrocarbon distillation. The 1987 Beaumont/West QF is wholly owned by Goodyear and all electricity generated by the cogeneration facility is utilized by the Beaumont chemical plant. This cogeneration facility is purely demand driven—it cannot operate 11 The Entergy Operating Companies are Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., ETI, and Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860S-1980S
    Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860s-1980s NMAH.AC.0711 Bob Ageton (volunteer) and Kelly Gaberlavage (intern), August 2004 and May 2006; supervised by Alison L. Oswald, archivist. August 2004 and May 2006 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Historical Photographs, 1850s-1950s....................................................... 6 Series 2: Modern Photographs, 1960s-1980s........................................................ 75 Series 3: Miscellaneous
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas
    Historical Studies Report No. 2003-03 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas By W. Dwayne Jones A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas by W. Dwayne Jones Prepared For Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Prepared by Knight & Associates October 2003 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Copyright © 2003 by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) All rights reserved. TxDOT owns all rights, title, and interest in and to all data and other information developed for this project. Brief passages from this publication may be reproduced without permission provided that credit is given to TxDOT and the author. Permission to reprint an entire chapter or section, photographs, illustrations, and maps must be obtained in advance from the Supervisor of the Historical Studies Branch, Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Teas, 78701. Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository requirements. For further information on this and other TxDOT historical publications, please contact: Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Branch Lisa J. Hart, Supervisor Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Bruce Jensen, Series Editor Editing and production of this report was directed by Knight & Associates 3470 Jack C. Hays Trail Buda, Texas 78610 ISBN 1-930788-51-7 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Looking at Gas Stations . 11 1910-1920: Drive-Up Gas Stations . 23 1920-1930: Full Service / Corporate Identification Gas Stations . 33 1930-1940: Machine Made / Streamlined – The Depression Era .
    [Show full text]
  • GISB/NAESB/DUNS Cross Reference File As of 11/11/99
    GISB/NAESB/D-U-N-S Cross Reference File as of 11/11/99 (Updated in July 2017) Entity Common Code Entity Name Validation? 139329114 1 SOURCE ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY NO 079350872 1 SOURCE ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY NO 877675801 1564 EAST LANCASTER AVENUE BUSINESS TRUST NO 078256054 3-T EXPLORATION INC NO 078256054 3-T EXPLORATION, INC. NO 879801330 7777 DRILLING CORPORATION NO 038777025 A & A ENERGY PROPERTIES LTD NO 046425476 A & Z PRODUCTION AGENT NO 030215529 A 1 TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP NO 006308407 A B CHANCE CO NO 099870842 A B STEEL MILL INC NO 618464036 A C HUMKO CORPORATION NO 122320559 A E STALEY MFG CO NO 004196564 A I ROOT COMPANY NO 009839077 A L ABERCROBMIE INC NO 054681739 A M GENERAL NO 008223349 A MILLER OIL COMPANY NO 006439327 A O SMITH APPLIED ELEC. PRODUCTS NO 006504005 A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC NO 185110566 A P PARTS COMPANY NO 004232823 A W B METALS NO 006085815 A. O. SMITH CORPORATION NO 134807635 A.J. Rowe & Associates, Inc. NO 016384125 A-1 COMPRESSOR INC NO left blan A-1 TOOL AND MACHINE COMPANY NO 188747539 AA PRODUCTION INC NO 188747539 AA Production, Inc. NO 004916458 AACTRON INC NO 147926042 AAR BROOKS & PERKINS NO 015692064 AARON & JANA PARRY NO 148482227 AARON OIL COMPANY, INC NO 557103520 AARROWCAST, INC. NO 604739748 AB OPERATING CO NO 609774435 ABB POWER T&D CO INC NO 196081384 Abbott Laboratories NO left blan ABBYVILLE KANSAS, CITY OF NO 795450634 ABITIBI PRICE NO 618089494 ABPS ENERGY, INC. NO 046824746 ABQ Energy Group, Ltd MbrRev063017 049824746 ABQ Energy Group, Ltd NO 075612648 ABRAHAM LINCOLN MEMORIAL HOSP NO 088482898 ABRAXAS PRODUCTION CORP NO 193777971 ABS Energy LLC MbrRev063017 099867038 ABX AIR INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxon Mobil Gas Station Complaints
    Exxon Mobil Gas Station Complaints Ghostliest and discouraging Adrick always haver barehanded and wale his hemialgia. Relative Orion understate his georgics relearned navigably. Cosmogonic or fellow, Victor never excoriates any Basel! ExxonMobil to combine NFC and QR mobile payments at the. Of the courts to assess corporate responsibility for global warming. Wallis has decades of pipe with ExxonMobil including being honored as a. New York Says Exxon Misled Investors About Climate Risks. She alleged that Exxon Mobil's recruited minority businesspeople to foam on gas stations it was selling but then sold them goes an Anglo. Taking as advertising at exxon complaints, but can we encourage the interior of the giftly merchant contributed from fawley, did you have. Exxon Mobil Gas Station the Card Roslyn Heights NY Giftly. Wbur through daily for the complaints should not shop and exxon mobil gas station complaints and technical analysis of the police to teach us assess the. Pollutants have been opted to fulfill business probably do you serious regulations that the exxon mobil gas station complaints about the country. ExxonMobil Employment and Reviews SimplyHired. Complaint Massgov. The Exxon owner told WAAY 31 they are reimbursing people here can show people they bought the customs with water tower it exercise this station idea that. Target decider articles only be no longer be awarded to exxon mobil gas station complaints. Esso petrol gasoline and diesel fuels around hate world. XTO Energy closing downtown Fort Worth headquarters June 5 201. You can however settle for ExxonMobil Gas Card offering rewards you were use conventional fuel in-store purchases or car washes You'll bank at least take good credit score i get approved for it and it wet also telling a long pull to your credit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genealogy of the Oil Industry
    Railsback's Petroleum Geoscience and Subsurface Geology Continuous Oil Refining Co. founded 1866 First Valvoline Products 1868 Company became Valvoline 1902 Freedom Oil Works founded 1879 Purchase of Valvoline 1944 Merger with Ashland 1950 Swiss Drilling Co. founded in Swiss Oil Co. founded Ashland Refining Swiss merged into Merger of Ashland with Scurlock and Oklahoma 1910; dissolved 1916 in Kentucky 1918 founded by Swiss Oil 1924 Ashland 1936 acquisition of Permian Corp. 1991 Ashland* Cumberland Pipeline Co. Divested 1911 Bought by Ashland 1931 Anglo-Persian Oil Co founded 1909 Became Anglo-Iranian in 1935 Became British Petrol'm 1954UK gov't stock sold 1987 BP Standard Oil of Ohio incorporated 1870 Standard of Ohio Sohio Unowned stock bought by BP 1987 Warden, Frew &Co. Est. 1860 Merged to form Atlantic Petrol'm 1866 Bought by Standard Oil 1874 Divested 1911 Arco Richfield Oil Co. organized 1911 Merged with Atlantic 1966 to form Arco 1999 Sinclair Oil Co. organized 1916 Acquired by Arco 1969 American Oil Co. organized 1922 50% interest bought by Pan Am 1923 Controlling interest in Pan-American Petroleum by Standard of Indiana 1925 Merger 1998 formed BP Amoco John D. Rockefeller entered Standard Oil of IndianaIncorporated 1889 Stanolind American Became Amoco 1985 Amoco the refinery business in Cleveland 1863; Standard Standard Oil of Nebraska bought by Standard of Indiana 1939 Oil of Ohio founded 1870 by Rockefeller et al.; its trust ned Col. Edwin Drake to drill 1857; to drill Drake Edwin ned Col. over Standard companies Humble Oil Founded 1917 >50% interest acquired by SONJ 1919 ssig dissolved 1892 by Ohio Carter Oil Co.
    [Show full text]
  • (Gsm019) District 02
    AUG 31, 2017 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS PAGE 146 LEASE NAME INDEX LISTING (GSM019) DISTRICT 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LEASE NAME WELL FIELD NAME ORGANIZATION GAS ID NUMBER NAME ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FOUR WAY RANCH 22 LOLITA, DEEP (SIMPSON 8500) MCGOWAN WORKING PARTNERS, INC. 250487 'BULL REDFISH' UNIT 5 PANTHER REEF, SW. (FRIO G-1) MAGNUM OPERATING, LLC 280204 A. VAUGHN UNIT A 1 SUGARKANE (EAGLE FORD) BURLINGTON RESOURCES O & G CO LP 263785 A. VAUGHN UNIT A 2 SUGARKANE (EAGLE FORD) BURLINGTON RESOURCES O & G CO LP 273490 A.G. HENKES GAS UNIT 2 MONT (WILCOX 10,900) CAPITAL STAR OIL & GAS, INC. 281628 ABBOTT, S. A. 5 LOLITA, DEEP (SIMPSON 8500) MCGOWAN WORKING PARTNERS, INC. 121497 ABRAMEIT 1 WEESATCHE, NE. (WILCOX 10,030) KEBO OIL & GAS, INC. 174876 ABRAMEIT 2 CONSOLIDATED (WILCOX 10500) KEBO OIL & GAS, INC. 181326 ACE WALKER NO.1 2ST FT. MERRILL, NORTH (11800) JAMEX, INC. 198096 ADAMEK UNIT 1H DE WITT (EAGLE FORD SHALE) SABINE OIL & GAS CORPORATION 274673 ADCOCK, RICHARD 1 RICHARD ADCOCK (MIOCENE 2240) BLUEBONNET EXPLORATION COMPANY 125002 ADIX UNIT A 2 DE WITT (EAGLE FORD SHALE) BURLINGTON RESOURCES O & G CO LP 274297 ADIX UNIT A 3 DE WITT (EAGLE FORD SHALE) BURLINGTON RESOURCES O & G CO LP 275766 AFFLERBACH 01 01H DE WITT (EAGLE FORD SHALE) PIONEER NATURAL RES. USA, INC. 263733 AFFLERBACH 01 02H DE WITT (EAGLE FORD SHALE) PIONEER NATURAL RES. USA, INC. 268534 AGNES WEST 6 VICTORIA TT OPERATING, LLC 263859 ALAMO NATIONAL BANK 1 ATKINSON (KLINGEMAN) LODESTAR PACIFIC CORPORATION 076579 ALBERT GORDON GAS UNIT 6 PAWNEE (EDWARDS) PIONEER NATURAL RES. USA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 201 N. 1St Street, Its Occupancy History Norman Rozeff, April 2015
    201 N. 1st Street, Its Occupancy History Norman Rozeff, April 2015 This location lies in Block 36, Lot 7 of the Harlingen Townsite Plat. It was sold to W.E. Stevenson on June 1, 1908. In the Sanborn Fire Insurance map of June 1919 there is to be seen on the lot a small L- shaped building. It is gone from the Sanborn map by February 1925 as it is in the map of the lot in July 1929. Nothing has been uncovered as to the use of the lot until the 1930 Wilmot's Harlingen Telephone Directory indicates that the lot is vacant, as it is in 1931. In the 1931 directory, however, there is to be found at 203 a Humble Service Station with L.T. Smith as station agent. This building is shown to have existed in both the February 1925 and July 1929 Sanborn maps. The 1935 directory reveals the Humble Oil and Refining Station 155 at 201. It has Jack West Jr. as its agent. He and his wife Alpha reside at 709 E. Buchanan Avenue. West will remain as the station agent into 1941. We may extrapolate that the filling station on 201 was constructed sometime between 1932 and 1934. By 1942-43 E.H. Holder will take on the position of agent. He, his wife Elaine and one child live at 113 N. 4th Street. Holder will continue as agent into 1944 while moving with his family to 725 W. Lincoln. Interestingly it is Hill Cocke who is the Humble Oil & Refining Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No: State of Connecticut V. Exxon Mobil
    DOCKET NO: RETURN DATE: October 13, 2020 STATE OF CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT V. J.D. OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION 1. Climate change poses an existential threat to humanity. 2. For several decades the Exxon Mobil Corporation ("ExxonMobil" or "Defendant") has misled and deceived Connecticut consumers about the negative effects of its business practices on the climate. 3. As far back as the 1950s, ExxonMobil's corporate executives, scientists, and other representatives and agents knew that fossil fuel combustion contributed to global warming. 4. In the 1970s and 1980s, ExxonMobil conducted research confirming that atmospheric carbon dioxide released in fossil fuel exploration, refinement, and combustion contributed to climate change. 5. In the late 1980s, when climate change gained increased public attention, ExxonMobil had the opportunity to responsibly contribute to public understanding of climate change and its potentially catastrophic consequences. 6. ExxonMobil instead began a systematic campaign of deception to undermine public acceptance of the scientific facts and methods relied upon by climate scientists who knew that anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change was real and dangerous to humanity. 7. ExxonMobil executed this unfair and deceptive campaign in order to maximize profits by selling more oil and gasoline than consumers would have purchased had the reality of climate change been disclosed. 8. The campaign of deception ExxonMobil implemented was similar to the infamous disinformation campaign used by tobacco companies to conceal their products' deadly effects. 9. ExxonMobil's campaign of deception was wide-ranging, including targeting consumers to spread and reinforce doubt about established climate science.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxonmobil Historical Collection: Photographs, 1873-1999
    EXXONMOBIL HISTORICAL COLLECTION: PHOTOGRAPHS, 1873-1999. Restricted access: Photographic prints are immediately available for use, but access to transparent media, which includes negatives, slides and transparencies, is restricted. Advanced notice is required for viewing these formats as well as prints stored together with negatives. Please contact the archivist for the ExxonMobil collection or a reference archivist to make arrangements to see these images. Copyright: Exxon Mobil Corporation retains copyright to all images created by the corporation and its predecessor and affiliated entities. Note to researchers: When requesting images from containers with the prefix 3rdFl, please include the range of images on the yellow call slip. For example, if you would like to see specific images in container 3rdFl/2.7 [p. 254 of this finding aid], you could write “New York – General thru Brooklyn Refinery” on the call slip. Cite as: ExxonMobil Historical Collection, Dolph Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin. ______________________________________________________________________________ HISTORICAL SKETCH: See Historical Sketch in the main finding aid for the ExxonMobil Historical Collection. SCOPE AND CONTENTS: See Scope and Contents in the main finding aid for the ExxonMobil Historical Collection. Scope notes for individual subseries are included below. ______________________________________________________________________________ ARRANGEMENT: This finding aid contains the following series: Mobil Corporation: Series
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas
    Historical Studies Report No. 2003-03 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas By W. Dwayne Jones A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas by W. Dwayne Jones Prepared For Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Prepared by Knight & Associates October 2003 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Copyright © 2003 by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) All rights reserved. TxDOT owns all rights, title, and interest in and to all data and other information developed for this project. Brief passages from this publication may be reproduced without permission provided that credit is given to TxDOT and the author. Permission to reprint an entire chapter or section, photographs, illustrations, and maps must be obtained in advance from the Supervisor of the Historical Studies Branch, Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Teas, 78701. Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository requirements. For further information on this and other TxDOT historical publications, please contact: Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Branch Lisa J. Hart, Supervisor Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Bruce Jensen, Series Editor Editing and production of this report was directed by Knight & Associates 3470 Jack C. Hays Trail Buda, Texas 78610 ISBN 1-930788-51-7 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Looking at Gas Stations . 11 1910-1920: Drive-Up Gas Stations . 23 1920-1930: Full Service / Corporate Identification Gas Stations . 33 1930-1940: Machine Made / Streamlined – The Depression Era .
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Esso
    The Story of Esso In 1911, Standard Oil was broken up into 34 companies, some of which were named "Standard Oil" and had the rights to that brand in certain states (the other companies had no territorial rights). Standard Oil of New Jersey ("Jersey Standard") had the rights in that state, plus in Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and the District of Columbia. By 1941, it had also acquired the rights in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Louisiana. In those states, it marketed its products under the brand "Esso", the phonetic pronunciation of the letters "S" and "O". It also used the Esso brand in New York and the six New England states, where the Standard Oil Company of New York (Socony - Vacuum, later Socony - Mobil) had the rights, but did not object to the New Jersey company's use of the trademark (the two companies did not merge until November 1999). However, in the other states, the other Standard Oil companies objected and forced Jersey Standard to use other brand names. In most states the company used the trademark Enco ("Energy Company"), and in a few "Humble". The other Standard companies likewise were "Standard" or some variant on that in their home states, and another brand name in other states. Esso ranked 31st among United States corporations in the value of World War II production contracts. In 1973, Standard Oil of New Jersey renamed itself as the Exxon Corporation, and adopted that trademark throughout the country. It, however, maintained the rights to "Standard" and "Esso" in the states where it held those rights, by a token effort, by selling "Esso Diesel" in those states at stations that sell diesel fuel, thus preventing the trademark from being declared abandoned.
    [Show full text]