Epilogue Psycho (1960) and the New Domestic Gaze

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Epilogue Psycho (1960) and the New Domestic Gaze Epilogue Psycho (1960) and the New Domestic Gaze By the time Fort Apache appeared in theatres, the Hollywood studios were in deep crisis. As Schatz puts it, “business was declining rapidly. In fact, the fall- ing gross revenues and profits for all the studios would not only continue but accelerate over the coming years” (1999: 331). When the studios did begin to recover, Hollywood had lost its monopoly on the moving sound image. Television began to penetrate everyday life. So, in the late 20th century, cinema was no longer as central to the habits and practices of Americans as it had been during the period in which it alone had the power to move pictures, and thus people. In response, cinema began to dramatize this very transformation through its interrogation of the cinematic gaze. The Gaze Rather than defining the “cinematic gaze” in conceptual terms, let me describe the picture that most famously theorizes this gaze. I’m thinking of course of that seminal moment from Alfred Hitchcock’s film Psycho (1960) that takes place about 45 minutes into the picture. Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) has arrived at the Bates Motel with a bag full of money stolen from her employer. After having dinner with Norman, she decides to shower, presumably to wash away her guilt. Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins), in an adjoining room, takes a painting from the wall. Behind the frame, a hole in the plaster through which Norman watches Marion undress. Here I offer the context, but the scene is important not only for its function in this specific narrative, but because of its formal structure; what that structure says about cinema itself, and about the viewer’s symbolic participation in cinematic violence. Norman looks at the hole in the wall. Then the camera angle changes, so that Norman is seen in profile. He slowly moves his face toward the peepshow. Around him, all is darkness. But his eye is illuminated from the light coming through the break in the plaster. Cut to Marion undressing to her undergar- ments, the picture oval framed by the black plaster so that it looks like some effect from a D.W. Griffith film. Then back to Norman’s eye, now in extreme close-up and fully illuminated by Marion’s room. This shot only lasts a few seconds. But it’s no accident that Norman’s eye looks much like a film projector, projecting images into the darkness. Here Hitchcock offers, in allegorical form, a theory of cinema spectatorship. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2014 | doi 10.1163/9789004276963_009 <UN> 184 Epilogue Norman Bates is simultaneously the projector and the receiver of the image. Hitchcock argues the spectator is intimately implicated in the spectacle, in the construction of cinematic “reality.” While it’s true that the spectator, the audience member, does not create the image, the viewer nonetheless participates in that image. In the particular case of Psycho, Hitchcock seems to be asking a question: Why do spectators enjoy the spectacle of violence? And he answers that ques- tion: It satisfies something in their psyche, some dark and unacknowledged self that is every bit as bloodthirsty as Norman Bates. In the play of shadow and light, every audience member becomes a murderous psycho. But there’s something more to say about this theory of the cinematic gaze. From Hitchcock’s Vertigo (1958) and Psycho, as well as Michael Powell’s masterwork, Peeping Tom (1960), to contemporary horror filmmakers, this gaze has been directed toward women. In fact, Psycho’s reflexive gaze impli- cates the viewer in the torture and murder of women. While there are certainly exceptions to this genre rule, often (especially in the “slasher” genre Hitchcock and Powell pioneered) the cinematic gaze is an unguarded expression of mas- culine domination that both reinforces domination and is reciprocally fueled by the energies of patriarchy circulating within the cinematic audiences (Bourdieu 2001). Thus we arrive at the sociological significance of Psycho’s cinematic gaze. This gaze signifies the spectator’s participation in cinematic violence (directed, here, against women), while, at the same time, suggesting that the spectator is, in turn shaped (interpellated) by the cinematic object itself. In other words, the film looks back at the spectator. In doing so, the film calls the spectator into a certain system of domination. Thus, cinema creates the audience, even as the audience, reciprocally, creates the cinematic object by participating in its vio- lent spectacle. Interpellating Community Writing on popular song as folklore, Gramsci argues that “what distinguishes a popular song…[is] the way it conceives the world and life, in contrast to official society” (Gramsci 1985: 195). True, cinema is not “popular song.” But consider Gramsci’s definition of the latter: “those [songs] written neither by the people nor for the people, but which the people adopt because they conform to their way of thinking and feeling” (ibid.). Now it becomes much easier to think about cinema through this Gramscian lens. Film is mediated by political and economic constraints, but within those constraints, certain films become pop- ular, while others hardly seem to exist. This suggests that viewers, to some <UN>.
Recommended publications
  • Greater Griffith Park Neighborhood Council Name: Jessica Kornberg
    Contact Information Neighborhood Council: Greater Griffith Park Neighborhood Council Name: jessica kornberg Phone Number: 917 446 8991 Email: [email protected] Date of NC Board Action: 09/21/2010 Type of NC Board Action: General Comments Impact Information Date: 09/27/2010 Update to a Previous Input: No Directed To: City Council and Committees Council File Number: 07-2858-S1 Agenda Date: 09/28/2010 Item Number: Brief Summary: The GGPNC reaffirms its opposition to supergraphic signs. In addition, we urge the City Council to retain the sign reduction program. In the event an entity erects different signage than permitted, then the permit should be revoked and the entity and signage should be deemed illegal and subject to the appropriate fines and penalties. Finally, the City Planning Commission should see all proposed signage before any permit is issued. Additional Information: GREATER GRIFFITH PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL “Your Neighborhood. Your Voice. Your Council” GOVERNING BOARD MEETING CERTIFIED COUNCIL #36 PRESIDENT Ron Ostrow MINUTES PO Box 27003 VICE PRESIDENTS Los Angeles, CA 90027- Tor Hyams - Administration 0003 Luisa Nubaravacharyan - Outreach September 21, 2010 – 7:00 p.m. TREASURER Los Feliz Community Police Center (323) 908-6054 Christina Khanjian 1965 n. Hillhurst Ave. (2nd floor of Citibank) www.ggpnc.org SECRETARY Los Angeles, CA 90027 Jessica Kornberg [email protected] 1. Call to Order. Quorum Check. 7:10pm Napier, Mims, DeOcampo excused. Here: RO, CK, TW, JG, MV, TO, JK, RD, FM, LVKC, HM, TH, MM 2. Reports from Public Officials City Attorney, Bill Larson: Update on Bates Motel. Order in place for abatement has been appealed.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Worksheets LEVEL 3 Teacher Support Programme
    PENGUIN READERS Activity worksheets LEVEL 3 Teacher Support Programme Psycho Photocopiable While reading a ‘I’m sorry I wasn’t in the office.’ Chapters 1–3 ……………………………………………… 1 Answer these questions about Marion Crane. b ‘What an amusing young man.’ a How old is she? ……………………………………………… ……………………………………………… c ‘You can’t bring strange young girls up to this b What kind of work does she do? house.’ ……………………………………………… ……………………………………………… c Is she married? d ‘I made trouble for you. I’m sorry.’ ……………………………………………… ……………………………………………… d Is she a happy woman? Why? / Why not? e ‘A boy’s best friend is his mother.’ ……………………………………………… ……………………………………………… e Does she have any brothers or sisters? f ‘If you love someone, you don’t leave them.’ ……………………………………………… ……………………………………………… 2 Complete the sentences with the names from g ‘I made a bad mistake.’ the box. ……………………………………………… 5 Choose the right answer. Tommy Cassidy Marion Crane a Why does Marion stop at the motel? … Sam Loomis Mr Lowery the policeman 1 Because she doesn’t want to see the a ………………… wants to marry her policeman again. boyfriend. 2 Because she is tired and hungry. b ………………… needs $11,000 to pay his 3 Because she wants to call Sam. debts. b Why does Marion write the wrong name in c ………………… is late to work after lunch the visitor’s book? … but her boss is having lunch with a customer. 1 Because she and Sam meet secretly. d ………………… is an unpleasant man with 2 Because she always does. lots of money. 3 Because she doesn’t want the police to find e ………………… leaves work with $40,000. her. f ………………… sees Marion Crane in her c Where does Marion hide the money? … car at some traffic lights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horror Within the Genre
    Alfred Hitchcock shocked the world with his film Psycho (Alfred Hitchcock, 1960), once ​ ​ he killed off Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) half way through the film. Her sister, Lila Crane (Vera Miles), would remain untouched even after Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) attacked her and her sisters lover. Unlike her sister, Lila did not partake in premarital sex, and unlike her sister, she survived the film. Almost 20 years later audiences saw a very similar fate play out in Halloween (John Carpenter, 1978). Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) managed to outlive her ​ three friends on Halloween night. Once she slashed her way through Michael Myers (Nick Castle), Laurie would remain the lone survivor just as she was the lone virgin. Both Lila and Laurie have a common thread: they are both conventionally beautiful, smart virgins, that are capable of taking down their tormentors. Both of these women also survived a male murder and did so by fighting back. Not isolated to their specific films, these women transcend their characters to represent more than just Lila Crane or Laurie Strode—but the idea of a final girl, establishing a trope within the genre. More importantly, final girls like Crane and Strode identified key characteristics that contemporary audiences wanted out of women including appearance, morality, sexual prowess, and even femininity. While their films are dark and bloodstained, these women are good and pure, at least until the gruesome third act fight. The final girl is the constant within the slasher genre, since its beginning with films like Psycho and ​ ​ Peeping Tom (Michael Powell, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • S • Homophones • One-Word Titles • Cool Beans • Landmark Addresses • Light the Way Multiple “A”S 1
    Category Trivia August 2021 There are six categories with six questions in each category. The categories are: • Multiple “A” s • Homophones • One-Word Titles • Cool Beans • Landmark Addresses • Light the Way Multiple “A”s 1. What organization represents retired people, is a source of information on topics of interest to seniors, and offers many membership benefits? AARP It stands for American Association of Retired People. Multiple “A”s 2. What are the initials of the 12-step program for alcoholics? AA It stands for Alcoholics Anonymous. Multiple “A”s 3. What are the letters for a two-year college degree? AA It stands for associate of arts. Some undergraduates earn an AA at a community college before completing the final two years of a bachelor’s degree at a four-year university. Multiple “A”s 4. What does NAACP stand for? National Association for the Advancement of Colored People It was founded in 1909, and it’s the largest and oldest civil rights organization in the United States. Multiple “A”s 5. What organization oversees college athletics? NCAA It stands for National Collegiate Athletic Association. Multiple “A”s 6. What is the highest bond rating? AAA Also known as investment-grade bonds, they are the safest bonds. Bonds rated CCC and below are considered junk bonds, and they pay the highest interest rate due to the possibility that investors may lose their entire investment. Homophones 7. What is your mother’s sister and an insect? Aunt/ant Homophones 8. What is an advertisement and how you arrive at a sum of numbers? Ad/add Today, advertisements come in many forms, from written copy to interactive videos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overbearing in Coriolanus and Psycho
    The Corinthian Volume 17 Article 2 2016 Mother Knows Best: The Overbearing in Coriolanus and Psycho Mikaela LaFave Georgia College and State University Follow this and additional works at: https://kb.gcsu.edu/thecorinthian Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation LaFave, Mikaela (2016) "Mother Knows Best: The Overbearing in Coriolanus and Psycho," The Corinthian: Vol. 17 , Article 2. Available at: https://kb.gcsu.edu/thecorinthian/vol17/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Research at Knowledge Box. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Corinthian by an authorized editor of Knowledge Box. The Corinthian: The Journal of Student Research at Georgia College Volume 17 • Spring 2016 Mother Knows Best: The Overbearing in Coriolanus and Psycho ercises enough influence over Martius to drive him toward self-de- Mikaela LaFave structive pride. The First Citizen establishes that Martius’ pride originates from his sense of obligation towards Volumnia: “Though Dr. Jenny Flaherty soft-conscienced men can be content to say it was for his country, Faculty Mentor [Martius] did it to please his mother and to be partly proud, which he is, even to the altitude of his virtue” (1.1.36-40). Shakespeare establishes that Martius’ pride possesses an indelible link to Volum- nia; rather than feeling pride for himself, or seeking out pride for Psychoanalytic critics have focused on the mother-son himself, he does so for his mother, framing their relationship as one relationship throughout its criticism, stemming from Freud’s rein- of fear and domination rather than love.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM BATES to BUSH the NEW SLASHER FILM By
    FROM BATES TO BUSH THE NEW SLASHER FILM By JAMES FENIMORE COOPER II Bachelor of Arts in Film Studies University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OFARTS July, 2011 FROM BATES TO BUSH THE NEW SLASHER FILM Thesis Approved: Dr. Stacy Takacs - Thesis Adviser Dr. Jeffrey Walker Dr. John Kinder Dr. Mark E. Payton - Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I am forever in the debt of Drs. Stacy Takacs, John Kinder, and Jeffrey Walker for their willingness to read through multiple drafts of a project on murder and mayhem. I owe a special “Thank You” to Dr. Takacs for being such a helpful guide in what seemed the darkest of hours; her advice, understanding, and counsel proved much too invaluable when the burdens of coursework, teaching, research, and writing weighed on me the most and anxiety loomed the largest. This essay owes much to her stewardship and to our conversations on film and culture. Moreover, I’d like to sincerely thank the following people for their varying influence on this project: Dr. Brian Price, for introducing me to Richard Rorty, for being such a thoughtful and patient man, and for convincing me to study at OSU; Dr. Carol Mason, for guiding me through the wonderful world of Michel Foucault and for making me feel like I had the whole world ahead of me; Dr. Ron Brooks, for teaching me how to teach and for his passion for students; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror
    The Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films 334 West 54th Street Los Angeles, California 90037-3806 Phone: (323) 752-5811 e-mail: [email protected] Robert Holguin (President) Dr. Donald A. Reed (Founder) Publicity Contact: Karl Williams [email protected] (310) 493-3991 “Gravity” and “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” soar with 8 Saturn Award nominations, “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire,” scores with 7, “Iron Man 3,” “Pacific Rim,” “Star Trek Into Darkness and Thor: The Dark World lead with 5 nominations apiece for the 40th Annual Saturn Awards, while “Breaking Bad,” “Falling Skies,” and “Game of Thrones” lead on TV in an Epic Year for Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror LOS ANGELES – February 26, 2014 – Alfonso Cuaron’s Gravity and Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug both received 8 nominations as the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films today announced nominations for the 40th Annual Saturn Awards, which will be presented in June. Other major contenders that received major nominations were The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, Guillermo del Toro’s Pacific Rim, Star Trek Into Darkness, The Book Thief, Her, Oz The Great anD Powerful and Ron Howard’s Rush. Also making a strong showing was the folk music fable InsiDe Llewyn Davis from Joel and Ethan Coen highlighting their magnificent and original work. And Scarlett Johansson was the first Best Supporting Actress to be nominated for her captivating vocal performance in Spike Jones’ fantasy romance Her. For the Saturn’s stellar 40th Anniversary celebration, two new categories have been added to reflect the changing times; Best Comic-to-Film Motion Picture will see Warner’s Man of Steel duking it out against Marvel’s Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark WorlD and The Wolverine! The second new category is Best Performance by a Younger Actor in a Television Series – highlighting the most promising young talent working in TV today.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycho by Charles Taylor “The a List: the National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002
    Psycho By Charles Taylor “The A List: The National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002 Reprinted by permission of the author The impact of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho” owes so much to its two big surprises that when the film opened in 1960 Hitchcock not only refused to allow press screenings but had theaters hire Pinkerton security guards to prevent latecomers from entering the theater once the picture had started. He wanted to keep the people who hadn’t bought tickets from finding out that Janet Leigh’s Marion Crane is stabbed to death in the shower only forty-five minutes into the movie, and that the murderer is Antho- ny Perkins’s Norma Bates, who has succumbed to the personality of the mother he murdered years before. In many ways, “Psycho” seems like a death knell for the studio system that would lumber on for a few more years before collapsing later in the decade under the weight of filmmakers and audiences sick of the old stultified formu- Alfred Hitchcock holding a clapper on the set of “Psycho.” las. It isn’t just that Hitchcock made the film fast and on Courtesy Library of Congress the cheap (it cost only $800,000), using the crew from his television anthology series “Alfred Hitchcock Presents.” We are as anxious for Norman not to be found out cover- And it’s not just the shock of the shower murder, its bril- ing up “mother’s” crime as we were for Marion not to get liant and savage elisions heralding and in many cases sur- caught stealing the $40,000 that started her on the jour- passing the screen violence to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Peeping Through the Holes
    Peeping Through the Holes Peeping Through the Holes: Twenty-First Century Essays on Psycho Edited by Eugenio M. Olivares Merino and Julio A. Olivares Merino Peeping Through the Holes: Twenty-First Century Essays on Psycho, Edited by Eugenio M. Olivares Merino and Julio A. Olivares Merino This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Eugenio M. Olivares Merino and Julio A. Olivares Merino and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4475-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4475-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................... vii Preface...................................................................................................... viii Chapter One................................................................................................. 1 Hitchcock and the Hollywood Production Code: Censorship and Critical Acceptance in the 1960s María del Carmen Garrido Hornos Chapter Two.............................................................................................. 25 “I Don’t Hate Her. I Hate What She’s Become:”
    [Show full text]
  • Marion, Norman, and the Collision of Narratives in Psycho | Reel 3 11/7/09 5:32 PM
    Marion, Norman, and the Collision of Narratives in Psycho | Reel 3 11/7/09 5:32 PM Home Marion, Norman, and the Collision of Narratives in Psycho By Jason Haggstrom, June 16, 2010 Today marks the 50th anniversary of the release of Psycho, one of Alfred Hitchcock's greatest films in a career that fostered the creation of many. As with all of Hitchcock's great films, Psycho can be seen as simple, face value entertainment or as a a film worthy of great study and analysis. I've seen Psycho many times over the course of my 34 years of existence, but what keeps me coming back is the way that Hitchcock uses multiple narratives to toy with audience perspective. The film begins with an objective narrative before switching to a subjective one only to see that narrative destroyed when it collides with another. This is an analysis of those narratives and how they shape (and re-shape) the way that we view the lead characters and their actions. Spoilers Ahead: Initial plot Plot twist Character death Psycho opens with a series of pans that overlook the city of Phoenix, Arizona. The shots cut progressively closer until the camera finally settles on one specific building, then one specific window. The camera drifts inside, an explicit act of voyeurism that exposes what would otherwise be a private moment: two lovers discuss the lunchtime affair they have been conducting during the free hours of the workday. Marion Crane http://reel3.com/marion-norman-and-the-collision-of-narratives-in-psycho/ Page 1 of 7 Marion, Norman, and the Collision of Narratives in Psycho | Reel 3 11/7/09 5:32 PM is introduced as a semi-naked body laying on a bed, a delectable object for the camera's eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchcock Blonde
    42nd Season • 405th Production SEGERSTROM STAGE / FEBRUARY 3 - MARCH 12, 2006 David Emmes Martin Benson PRODUCING ARTISTIC DIRECTOR ARTISTIC DIRECTOR presents the American premiere of HITCHCOCK BLONDE written and directed by Terry Johnson William Dudley Chris Parry Ian Dickinson Ian Galloway for Mesmer SCENIC/COSTUME/VIDEO DESIGN LIGHTING DESIGN COMPOSER/SOUND DESIGN VIDEO REALIZATION Magdalena Zira Jeff Gifford Jamie A. Tucker* ASSISTANT DIRECTOR PRODUCTION MANAGER STAGE MANAGER Valerie and Geoff Fearns HONORARY PRODUCERS Hitchcock Blonde • SOUTH COAST REPERTORY P1 THE CAST (in order of appearance) Jennifer .................................................................................. Adriana DeMeo* Alex ............................................................................................. Robin Sachs* Hitch ..................................................................................... Dakin Matthews* Blonde ...................................................................................... Sarah Aldrich* Husband .................................................................................... Martin Noyes* LENGTH Approximately two hours and 10 minutes, including one 15-minute intermission. PRODUCTION STAFF Assistant Stage Manager ................................................. Chrissy Church* Casting .............................................................................. Joanne DeNaut Fight Choreographer ............................................................ Martin Noyes Stage Management Intern
    [Show full text]
  • The Fisher King
    Movies & Languages 2018-2019 Psycho About the movie (subtitled version) DIRECTOR Alfred Hitchcock YEAR/COUNTRY 1960 / USA GENRE Thriller ACTORS A. Perkins (Norman Bates), J. Leigh (Marion Crane), J. Gavin (Sam Loomis), V. Miles (Marion’s sister, Lila), M. Balsam (Arbogast) PLOT Marion Crane is a trusted secretary who steals $40,000 in cash that her boss entrusts her with, planning to take it to her lover, Sam, and start a new life. However, she is not very good at being a criminal and makes a policeman suspicious, and also a car salesman when she trades in her car. Due to a heavy rainstorm, she ends up at the Bates motel, which is well off the main highway, where the shy manager offers her a room, a meal and a chat. They have a conversation about life’s traps which makes Marion decide to give the money back. However, Marion is murdered in the shower before she can carry out her plan. Wanting to get the money back without involving the police, Marion’s boss, her sister and the boss’s associate pay a private detective, Arbogast, to track her down. After notifying Lila and Sam that he is intending to interview Bates’ mother, Arbogast disappears, and the two searchers contact the local sheriff. Here they make some discoveries which lead them to go out to the motel themselves and solve the mystery. LANGUAGE This movie contains very little complex vocabulary – indeed, it contains relatively little dialogue. The English used, although American in accent, is standard and classic, with the slight exception of the sheriff, who uses a few more colourful expressions (e.g.
    [Show full text]