Manuscript Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
School Safety Newsletter Statewide Terrorism & Intelligence Center Mia Ray Langheim 2200 S
Volume 4, Issue 11 June 2017 The Viral Internet Stunts Parents Should Know CNN, May 24, 2017 Protecting our http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/24/health/viral-youtube-challenges-partner/? iid=ob_homepage_deskrecommended_pool future through It's a tale as old as time: We see a lot of people wearing/doing/saying something and we want to try it, too. Back in the day it was saying "Bloody Mary" into a mirror at slumber parties. Today, it means viral social media information stunts. Though adults get caught up, too, kids are especially susceptible to peer pressure and FOMO (fear of missing out). To them, what was once a double-dog dare is now a popular YouTuber eating a hot pepper just to see what happens. sharing Called "challenges," these stunts range from harmless to horrifying: There are the silly ones (such as the Mannequin Challenge); the helpful ones (like the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge); and the slightly risky ones (such as In This Issue the Make Your Own Slime Challenge). But sometimes, challenges are downright dangerous, resulting in physical injury -- and possibly even death. So what's a parent to do? The Viral Internet Stunts Parents Should Below are some of the hottest challenges that have swept social media; some fade and then make a comeback. In Know most cases, kids are watching these challenges on YouTube purely for entertainment, but some challenges inspire Next Monthly kids to try them out themselves. (In fact, the safe ones can be fun for families to try.) Others -- like the Backpack Webinar - September Challenge -- are often done with the goal of filming other kids and broadcasting the results online. -
Notes Safety Summit 2017
1/5/17 Bullying in the Digital Age A new twist on an old problem… 1 DigitalDanger.org 2 DigitalDanger.org Humiliation • A common reaction to cyber harassment • Escalator of conflict • More powerful than happiness or sadness What’s the Big Deal? • Evidence from electro-encephalogram Source = Otten & Jonas (2013) DigitalDanger.org 3 DigitalDanger.org 4 1 1/5/17 Social Exclusion So What? • Impacts more than feelings • The more trauma they experienced, the more problems they • Negatively impacts behavioral regulation experience as adults • Decreased impulse control • Stress changes the structure and function of the brain, sometimes for • Increased aggression life • Evidence from electro-encephalogram • Grows the amygdala (emotional brain) • Shrinks the cortex (thinking brain) • Area of the brain impacted hurts skills necessary for school • Emotional regulation Source = Otten & Jonas (2012) • Executive functions Source = Anda, R. - The Health and Social Impact of Growing Up with Adverse DigitalDanger.org 5 Child Experiences DigitalDanger.org 6 Reporting Suicidal Posts • Twitter, Facebook and Instagram offer ways to report suicide threats. • A review mechanism is triggered. See something….Say • Facebook sends the reports to a safety team • May send e-mail encouraging them to call the National Suicide Prevention something Lifeline 1-800-273-TALK (8255) • Click on a link to begin a confidential chat session with a crisis worker • Could trigger well-being check by law enforcement DigitalDanger.org 7 DigitalDanger.org 8 2 1/5/17 Students Arguing About Where to Sit During Coach Doesn’t Let Parents Join The Basketball An Assembly Team’s Team Twitter Account a. Kid Issue a. -
Rizikové Výzvy V On-Line Prostředí
PŘEHLEDOVÉ ČLÁNKY RIZIKOVÉ VÝZVy v oN-LINE PROSTřEDÍ Rizikové výzvy v on-line prostředí doc. Mgr. Kamil Kopecký, Ph.D.1, Mgr. Pavla Střílková1, PhDr. René Szotkowski, Ph.D.1, José-Marĺa Romero-Rodríguez2 1Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci 2Univerzita Granada, Španělsko On-line výzvy představují fenomén, který existoval již před příchodem internetu a který se masivně rozvinul především díky internetovým službám umožňujícím sdílet velké množství informací (především audiovizuální obsah) mezi ostatní uživatele. On-line výzvy mohou být zaměřeny pozitivně, např. na různých druhů kampaní na podporu informací, výzkumu a vývoje léčebných metod zaměřených na konkrétní diagnózu (typicky výzva Ice Bucket Challenge). Velké množství výzev však může osobám (často dětem), které se do nich zapojí, způsobit vážnou fyzickou či psychickou újmu. Jako příklady lze uvést Choking Challenge, Salt and Ice Challenge, Eyeballing Challenge apod. V našem textu se zaměřujeme právě na ně. Klíčová slova: on-line bezpečnost, rizikové výzvy, eyeballing, duck tape challenge, salt and ice challenge, choking challenge. Dangerous Challenges on the Internet Online challenges are a phenomenon that existed before the advent of the Internet and has developed massively, mainly through Internet-based services that allow the sharing of large amounts of information (mainly audiovisual content) among other users. Online challenges can be positively targeted, for example, to different types of campaigns to support information, research and development of treatment methods for a specific diagnosis (typically the Ice Bucket Challenge). However, a large number of challenges can cause serious physical or psychological harm to people (often children) involved. Examples include the Choking Challenge, the Salt and Ice Challenge, the Eyeballing Challenge, and so on. -
Analysis of Results
Analysis of Results The Key to Age-Locked Videos In order to formulate a quantitative assessment of risk that the viral video challenge genre may pose, I turned to YouTube’s intrinsic safeguarding tool: ‘Age-Lock’. According to YouTube, “Age-restricted content” is content that “doesn't violate our policies, but may not be appropriate for all audiences” (Y ouTube Age Restriction) . These “age-restricted videos are not visible to users who are logged out, are under 18 years of age, or have Restricted Mode enabled” (Ibid). YouTube has dened the stipulations for age-restricted videos as something that contains at least one of the following: “vulgar language, violence and disturbing imagery, nudity and sexually suggestive content or portrayal of harmful or dangerous activities” (Ibid). Violating videos may be agged in a number of ways such as “video title, description, metadata, Community Guidelines reviews,” in order “to identify and lter out potentially mature content” (Ibid). Therefore, by aggregating which videos had an ‘Age-Lock’ imposed by YouTube, we may come to understand which challenges generally tend to consistently present more “harmful or dangerous activities”. Particularly as the platform relies heavily on public perception and participation through the ‘report’ module available on each video. While age-restricted videos are “not appropriate for all audiences” they are not directly “violating” their policies. Therefore one must question why YouTube permits the publication of content that is both “not appropriate for all audiences” and depicts “harmful or dangerous activities”. 54 As the only videos to have age-restriction imposed upon them fall into either the Harmful or Dangerous category proposed above, it is clear that despite YouTube’s “Policies on harmful or dangerous Content” there is still a lack of armative action in the case of regulation.