Jerne's Anti-Idiotypic Network Theory Cannot Explain Self-Nonself

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jerne's Anti-Idiotypic Network Theory Cannot Explain Self-Nonself Journal of Alternative Medicine Research ISSN: 1939-5868 Volume 1, Issue 4, pp.439-444 © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Human development XVII: Jerne’s anti-idiotypic network theory cannot explain self-nonself discrimination Søren Ventegodt∗1,2,3,4,5, Tyge Dahl Abstract Hermansen1, Isack Kandel6,7 and Joav Merrick5,7,8,,9 In this paper we propose that self-nonself discrimination 1 takes place at a supra-cellular systemic level and involves Quality of Life Research Center, Classensgade 11C, 1 selective activation of immune cell precursors. We discuss sal, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark; this activation, the further differentiation to active 2Research Clinic for Holistic Medicine and lymphocytes, and the following immune response induced 3Nordic School of Holistic Medicine, Copenhagen, by the system permitting all relevant information to be Denmark; involved in the “decision” process in a dynamic way. We 4Scandinavian Foundation for Holistic Medicine, discuss Jerne’s immunological network theory based on the capability of self-nonself discrimination and we discuss if Sandvika, Norway; 5 his immunological network theory is able to carry out such Interuniversity College, Graz, Austria; self-nonself discrimination. We argue that this is not the 6 Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Behavioral case. We discuss the immune tolerance that seems not to be Sciences, Ariel University Center of Samaria, Ariel, transferred with the immune cells, what Jerne’s network Israel; model involves as a necessity. We discuss Jerne’s 7National Institute of Child Health and Human idiotypical network’s capability of being expanded to include T-cells. Also here we argue that this is not the case. Development 8 Furthermore, We discuss Jerne’s own arguments for his Office of the Medical Director, Division for Mental immunological network theory and discuss different Retardation, Ministry of Social Affairs, Jerusalem, experiments capability of supporting or rejecting Jerne’s Israel and immunological network theory. We found that not enough 9Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky, evidence and proof for his model have yet been presented Lexington, United States in the forum of discussion or in the scientific literature to support the existence of Jernes network theory. Finally we argue that his model in principle can not explain the immunological self-nonself discrimination. Keywords: Immunology, self-nonself discrimination, holistic biology, theoretical biology, clinical holistic medicine, public health, T-cells. Introduction In this paper we discuss self-nonself discrimination, mainly in the view of the Danish immunologist Niels ∗ Correspondence: Søren Ventegodt, MD, MMedSci, MSc, Kaj Jerne (1911-1994) immunological network theory Director, Quality of Life Research Center, Classensgade (1,2). In 1974, Niels Jerne came up with his network 11C, 1 sal, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark. Tel: +45- 33-141113; Fax: +45-33-141123; E-mail: theory for the immune system (1). It was an a priori [email protected] hypothesis that had no experimental foundation. It 440 Søren Ventegodt, Tyge Dahl Hermansen, Isack Kandel et al. was what Jerne himself later called “a preconceived paratopes not necessarily means that the two idea” (2). Jerne did take an important step in 1974, antibodies have the same idiotopes. He furthermore because the investigation of systemic information was assumes that each antibody recognizes through its and is essential. Because the scientific community at paratope and is recognized through all its idiotopes. that time had no clue about the function of the Jerne emphasized, that the resulting network immune system as a system, Jerne’s hypothesis was implies both free and cell bound Ig, why the B-cells very well received. Because a network theory was are involved. He mentioned that Myeloma Ig gives expected at that time, many immunologists did not idiotypespecific tolerance, when it is administered question the nature of Jerne’s theory. The hypothesis untreated in a mouse, while the polymerised or was in its basic elements simple and easy to modified Myeloma Ig gives anti-idiotypic antibody understand, but in its totality impossible to get an response. From this he concludes, that the B- overview of, even incomprehensible. Nobody had lymphocyte can react with response or with tolerance expected the regulation of the immune system to be at the Ig (this is not a logical consequence but seems simple, and fundamentally Jerne’s theory did not very reasonable). He further mentions, that most of deter many immunologists. Today opponents against the experiments suggest that B-cells become Jerne’s theory reject his network theory as a formal suppressed, when a paratope of an alien Ig finds an absurdity (3-5), and its spokesmen admit that self- idiotope at the B-cell (but the evidence seems weak). nonself discrimination also in the view of Jerne’s Finally, Jerne (1) emphasized the importance of theory lack the capability of controlling the network suppression: “I have become increasingly convinced (6). Jerne’s network theory only takes care of the of its lymphocytes”, he wrote. regulation of the immune response after activation Experiments with tolerance induction show that a (when the “choices” has been taken), and a problem cell also can become suppressed when it meets the concerning the spokesmen is that Jerne rarely cites the specific epiotope for which it has a paratope, experimental results that contradict his network wherefore the inhibiting forces in the network seem to theory (7,8). outdo the activating forces. Jerne imagined a dynamic According to Klein (9) a network is a possibility, equilibrium, where the immune cells through and he discusses the existence of idiotype specific inhibition are prevented from working, except when cells (Th-cells). There are as many experiments that they are needed. Jerne mentioned the problem of low- confirm the existence of these cells as there are dose tolerance and wrote that the concentration of Ig- experiments that contradict their existence. We think idiotopes maybe exceed the threshold of low-dose the existing proof for confirmation of Jerne’s network tolerance. The low-dose interval, however, seemed to theory has not been sufficient. In this paper we argue be 106-1012 epitopes pr. ml., while the average of Ig- that Jerne’s network theory is not able to explain the idiotopes taken as an average of some millions, is mechanism behind self-nonself discrimination, what about 1010. This value should furthermore be our holistic paradigm is (10). adjusted in a downward direction for the peaks of specific Ig’s formed in connection with an immune response. Thereby the idiotopes seem to fall within Jerne’s network model the low-dose tolerance interval. From this we conclude that the immune system has an eigen- Jerne (1) at first defined a few concepts: the behaviour and constantly reacts towards itself. antigen determinant he called the epiotope, and the In figure 1 for each Ig plotted a paratope (P) and antibody combining site he called the paratope. Each an idiotope (I) are also. P(Ig1) (also referred to as individual antibody molecule carries a specific AB1 below) recognizes the antigen (E) (left). But, at paratope, but also a number of its own specific the same time, the paratope P(Ig1) fits to an idiotope determinants that under specific circumstances are I(Ig2) on the Ig2. P(Ig1) have its own idiotope I(Ig1) able to give an immune response. These are situated that is recognized on P(Ig3). To a stranger epitope E, at the variable part and are called idiotopes (idios = a set of Ig’s (P-I) exists with different affinity. self). Jerne assumes that the existence of identical Human development XVII 441 Figure 1. A model of Niels Jerne’s immunological network modified from (1). For each Ig a paratope (P) and an idiotope (I) are plotted. P(Ig1) recognizes the antigen (E). The paratope P(Ig1) fits to an idiotope I(Ig2) on the Ig2. P(Ig1) have its own idiotope I(Ig1) that is recognized on P(Ig3). To a foreign epitope E, a set of Ig’s (P-I) exists with different affinity produced through an immune response. A modification of Jerne [1] (figure 7). These affinities can be produced through an inhibited itself, etc. etc.. The activated inner picture, immune response. They recognize a great amount of have an inner picture itself that have to be activated, idiotopes said to be the E’s “inner picture”. These Ig’s etc. etc. have a huge amount of idiotopes (I’s) that are After this the strengthened inner picture recognized by an extended set of paratopes (P’s). uninhibited provoke an activation (and propagation?) Jerne argued that the inner picture may have the of AB1-cells that may soon exist in huge amounts. same effect as the presentation of an outer antigen, Jerne thought that this reinforcement would tend and therefore may stimulate the B-lymphocytes. The against counteracting the mentioned avalanche in extended set that recognizes the Ig-idiotopes, on the such way that the network attempts to regain its other hand, should be inhibiting. However, the balance. But we ask how this should be able to immune system is after this in a stage of extended happen. The enforcement has exactly come through as suppression that has to be overcome through an a consequence of the unbalance in the system. So, will outside stimulus, the antigen. This may be the first it be able to bring it in balance again? We do not think step in an immune response and may correspond to a so. Analogically, this could be compared to a man suddenly miss of AB1, because this then, is tied to the that, to find the balance again, grabs the stone he antigen. This leads to absence of inhibition on a part caused to unbalance and just has lost.
Recommended publications
  • MINIREVIEW Idiotypic Vaccines and Infectious Diseases JACQUES R
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, June 1988, p. 1407-1413 Vol. 56, No. 6 0019-9567/88/061407-07$02.00/0 Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology MINIREVIEW Idiotypic Vaccines and Infectious Diseases JACQUES R. HIERNAUX Laboratory of Microbial Immunity, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 INTRODUCTION If we accept the view that idiotypic interactions play a role in the regulation of the immune response to infectious The discovery of vaccination by Jenner, as well as the agents, various types of idiotypic manipulations (the injec- development of the principle of vaccines by Pasteur, had an tion of internal-image-bearing antibody being one of them) enormous impact on the eradication of many infectious could influence ongoing regulatory processes. On the basis diseases. These developments opened the road to the devel- of the idiotypic-network hypothesis, the idiotypic cascade opment of attenuated (i.e., live) or inactivated (i.e., nonin- presented in Fig. 1 can fectious) vaccines; however, such vaccines are not without be developed. Figure 1 follows problems and can have detrimental effects. Indeed, attenu- Jerne's original assumption that paratopes and idiotopes are ated vaccines can revert to a more virulent form, and distinct functional entitites. This allows us to deduce which inactivated vaccines may produce serious side effects. There interactions can potentially occur within the idiotypic cas- also are several infectious diseases for which no vaccines cade. For the sake of simplicity, I only present some of the are available. For example, many parasitic infections cannot members of the cascade and consider one or two idiotopes be prevented by vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Idiotype Antibody Generation and Application in Antibody Drug Discovery
    Anti-idiotype Antibody Generation and Application in Antibody Drug Discovery Liusong Yin, PhD Senior Scientist, Group Leader Antibody Discovery, Antibody Department, GenScript [email protected] Apr 21st, 2016 Presentation Overview Anti-idiotype antibody introduction 1 2 Anti-idiotype antibody application 3 Anti-idiotype antibody development 4 Anti-idiotype antibody case study Make Research Easy 2 Structural overview of antibodies PDB ID: 1HZH Liusong Yin, 2014, A Dissertation Make Research Easy 3 Antibody ‘-types’ Isotype (species specific)– the phenotypic variations in the constant regions of the heavy and light chains Allotype (animal specific)– the genetically determined difference in antibodies between individuals in the same species, mainly a couple AA differences in constant region Idiotype (antigen specific)– the antigen binding specificity defined by the distinctive sequence in the variable region of antibodies Make Research Easy 4 ‘-topes’ in anti-idiotype antibodies (anti-IDs) Idiotope – the antigenic determinants in or close to the complementarity determining region (CDR) in variable region Epitope Paratope Paratope – the part of an Ab that recognizes an antigen, the antigen-binding site of an Ab Epitope – the part of the antigen to which the paratope binds Anti-IDs – anti-idiotype antibodies which recognize the shared feature of idiotopes Make Research Easy 5 Different types of Anti-IDs Antigen-blocking Non-blocking Complex-specific Anti-ID Drug Target Anti-ID Anti-ID Antibody drug Antibody drug Antibody drug
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Antibodies Production
    THEORIES OF ANTIBODIES PRODUCTION 1. Instructive Theories a. Direct Template Theory b. Indirect Template Theory 2. Selective Theories a. Natural Selection Theory b. Side Chain Theory c. Clonal Selection Theory d. Immune Network Theory INSTRUCTIVE THEORIES Instructive theories suggest that an immunocompetent cell is capable of synthesizing antibodies of all specificity. The antigen directs the immunocompetent cell to produce complementary antibodies. According to these theories the antigen play a central role in determining the specificity of antibody molecule. Two instructive theories are postulated as follows: Direct template theory: This theory was first postulated by Breinl and Haurowitz (1930). They suggested that a particular antigen or antigenic determinants would serve as a template against which antibodies would fold. The antibody molecule would thereby assume a configuration complementary to antigen template. This theory was further advanced as Direct Template Theory by Linus Pauling in 1940s. Indirect template theory: This theory was first postulated by Burnet and Fenner (1949). They suggested that the entry of antigenic determinants into the antibody producing cells induced a heritable change in these cells. A genocopy of the antigenic determinant was incorporated in genome of these cells and transmitted to the progeny cells. However, this theory that tried to explain specificity and secondary responses is no longer accepted. SELECTIVE THEORIES Selective theories suggest that it is not antigen, but the antibody molecule that play a central role in determining its specificity. The immune system already possess pre-formed antibodies of different specificities prior to encounter with an antigen. Three selective theories were postulated as follows: Side chain theory: This theory was proposed by Ehrlich (1898).
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies and “Tumor-Only” Antigens: an Update Alejandro López-Requenaa,B and Oscar R
    The Open Immunology Journal, 2009, 2, 1-8 1 Open Access Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies and “Tumor-Only” Antigens: An Update Alejandro López-Requenaa,b and Oscar R. Burrone*,b aDepartment of Antibody Engineering, Center of Molecular Immunology, P.O. Box 16040, Havana 11600, Cuba bMolecular Immunology Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Padriciano 99, 34012 Trieste, Italy Abstract: The use of anti-idiotypic antibodies for cancer treatment continues to be a major field of investigation. One ma- jor challenge for tumor immunotherapy is the identification of antigens associated only or preferably with malignant cells. We summarize here some of the most recent preclinical and clinical advances using two targets that can be considered tumor-specific antigens: N-glycolyl (NeuGc)-gangliosides and the idiotype of B cell lymphomas. Recent developments with tumor-associated protein antigens and the role of anti-idiotypic antibodies in autoimmune diseases are also discussed. Keywords: Anti-idiotypic antibodies, NeuGc, ganglioside, idiotype, B cell lymphoma. INTRODUCTION antigen. The generation of anti-idiotypic antibodies against Ab2 (anti-Ab2 or Ab3) with the same specificity of the Ab1 From the pioneer works by Oudin and Kunkel [1, 2], (Ab1’) can be impaired by the peripheral tolerance mecha- where the existence of individual antigenic determinants of nisms of the organism even when the Ab2 carries the “inter- the immunoglobulins (idiotopes) was demonstrated, to nal image” of the antigen [6]. Jerne’s Idiotypic Network Theory [3]; through Bona’s “regu- latory idiotope” [4] and Coutinho’s “second generation” Anti-idiotypic antibodies have been widely used for can- networks [5], the theory around anti-idiotypic antibodies has cer immunotherapy [7].
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Against a Human Multiple Organ- Reactive Autoantibody
    Anti-idiotypic antibodies against a human multiple organ- reactive autoantibody. Detection of idiotopes in normal individuals and patients with autoimmune diseases. K Essani, … , P R McClintock, A L Notkins J Clin Invest. 1985;76(4):1649-1656. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112150. Research Article We have recently isolated and characterized a human monoclonal autoantibody, MOR-h1 (multiple organ-reactive human 1), that reacts with antigens in multiple organs and have shown that this antibody binds to human growth hormone and a 35,000-mol wt protein. In the present study we generated three monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies (4E6, 3E5, and 3F6) against MOR-h1. These anti-idiotypic antibodies specifically reacted with MOR-h1 and not with 26 other multiple organ- reactive monoclonal IgM autoantibodies nor with pooled human IgM (myeloma proteins). The binding of the anti-idiotypic antibodies to MOR-h1 was inhibited by both human growth hormone and the 35,000-mol wt protein, which strongly suggests that these antibodies react with epitopes at or near the paratope on MOR-h1. The results of competitive binding experiments revealed that the epitope recognized by 4E6 is distinct from that recognized by 3E5 and 3F6. Using these anti-idiotypic antibodies, lymphocytes and sera from normal individuals were tested for the presence of the 4E6 and 3E5/3F6 idiotopes. By indirect immunofluorescence, the 4E6 idiotope was detected on an average of 1.1% of normal circulating B lymphocytes, and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, the 4E6 and to a lesser extent the 3E5/3F6 idiotopes were found on IgG molecules in sera of normal individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Idiotype Antibodies in Cancer Treatment
    Oncogene (2007) 26, 3594–3602 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer treatment ALo´ pez-Dı´ az de Cerio, N Zabalegui, M Rodrı´ guez-Calvillo, S Inoge´ s and M Bendandi Lab of Immunotherapy, Oncology Division, Center for Applied Medical Research and Cell Therapy Area, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain As a cancer immunotherapy tool, idiotypes (Ids) have been tiny amount of them normally present in any individual used in different ways over the last three decades, is insufficient to elicit self-tolerance, whereas allotopes depending on the actual human tumor cell target.It all can be also recognized as foreign, but rather because started with passive, monoclonal, anti-Id antibody treat- they are not shared by different individuals (Bendandi, ment of B-cell lymphoma, a setting in which results were 2001). To date, the patient-specific Id borne by a tantalizing, but logistics unsustainable.It then moved number of different B-cell lymphoma subtypes is the toward the development of anti-Id vaccines for the sole, complete, tumor-specific antigen we know (Bend- treatment of the same tumors, a setting in which we have andi, 2004). recently provided the first formal proof of principle of clinical benefit associated with the use of a human cancer vaccine.Meanwhile, it also expanded in the direction of Id-based immunotherapy strategies for the treatment of exploiting the antigenic mimicry of some Ids with Id- cancer unrelated, tumor-associated antigens for the immunother- The most obvious application of such a tumor-specific apy of a number of solid tumors, a setting in which clinical antigen would be of course that consisting in targeting it results are still far from being consolidated.All in all, over by means of therapeutic antibodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Ids in Allergy: Timeliness of a Classic Concept
    BASIC AND CLINICAL TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE IN ALLERGY,ASTHMA AND IMMUNOLOGY REVIEW SERIES Anti-Ids in Allergy: Timeliness of a Classic Concept Julia Wallmann, MSc, Isabella Pali-Scho¨ll, PhD, and Erika Jensen-Jarolim, MD idiotypes. Classically, Jerne defined the order of an antibody Abstract: Anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-ids) are part of natural response as follows: Antibody Ab1 is produced in response to immune responses with regulatory capacity. Their effect on an an antigen and induces the production of anti-idiotypic Ab2, antigen-specific, so-called Ab1 antibody response, is dependent on which can in turn stimulate the synthesis of an anti-(anti- 1) the original antigen, which they mirror, being Ab2 antibodies, and idiotypic) antibody Ab3, and so forth (Fig. 1). Anti-idiotypic 2) their isotype. In the case of IgE-mediated allergy, natural anti-ids antibodies (Ab2) can be classified into several categories against allergen-specific IgE represent internal images of allergen according to their fine specificity (Fig. 2): 1) conventional molecules. A key biologic feature of allergens is that they can Ab2␣ antibodies recognize idiotopes of Ab1 outside of its crosslink IgE, expressed by B-lymphocytes or passively bound via antigen binding site, but still within the variable region; 2) high affinity receptors to effector cells, which renders cellular internal image Ab2␤ antibodies recognize idiotopes directly activation. Therefore, the IgE cross linking capability of anti-ids within the antigen binding site of Ab1 and, therefore, mimic its determines whether they dampen or enhance immediate-type hyper- original antigen epitope like “internal images”; 3) in case the sensitivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction and Characterization of Monoclonal Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Reactive with Idiotopes of Canine Parvovirus Neutralizing Monoc!Onal Antibodies*
    Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 29 ( 1991 ) 139-150 139 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam Induction and characterization of monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies reactive with idiotopes of canine parvovirus neutralizing monoc!onal antibodies* G.F. Rimmelzwaan, J.H. van Es, G. Drost, F.Gx."M ..... UytdeHaag and A.D.M.E. Osterhaus Department of lmmunobiology, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, P.O. Box I, 3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands (Accepted 26 September 1990) ABSTRACT Rimmelzwaan, G.F., van Es, J.H., Drost, G., UytdeHaag, F.G.C.M. and Osterhaus, A.D.M.E., 1991. Induction and characterization of monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies reactive with idiotopes of canine parvovirus neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 29:139- 150. Monoclonal anti-idiotypic (anti-ld) antibodies (Ab2) were generated against idiotypes (ld) of canine parvovirus (CPV) specific monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). The binding of most of these anti-Id antibodies to their corresponding Id could be inhibited by antigen, thus classifying these anti- id antibodies as Ab2~, or Aozp. by mmmung experiments it waa anuw. mat ui~. ....... - ........... did not recognize interspecies cross-reactive idiotopes, but recognized private idiotopes, uniquely as- sociated with the Id of the anti-CPV MoAb used for immunization. This classifies these anti-ld anti- bodies as non-internal image Ab2y. The potential use of these non-internal image anti-ld antibodies for the induction of antiviral antibodies in the CPV system is discussed. ABBREVIATIONS BSA, bovine serum albumin; CPV, canine parvovirus; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent as- say; FPV, feline parvovirus; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IAC, immunoaffinity chromatography; Id, idiotypes; KLH, keyhole limpet haemocyanin; MoAb, monoclonal antibodies; PBS, phosphate-buff- ered saline; SPF, specific pathogen free; TMB, tetramethylbenzidine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antibody Response to Specific Immune Complexes Is Under Genetic Control and Correlates with the Expression of a Recurrent Idiotype
    THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC IMMUNE COMPLEXES IS UNDER GENETIC CONTROL AND CORRELATES WITH THE EXPRESSION OF A RECURRENT IDIOTYPE BY MICHAEL J. CAULFIELD, KATHLEEN J. LUCE, DIANA SHAFFER AND JEFFREY P. LAKE* From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44106; and the *Department of Pathology, The Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 In the natural selection theory of antibody formation (1), Jerne proposed that the "antigen is solely a selective carrier of spontaneous circulating antibody to a system of cells which can reproduce the antibody." Although proposed before the nature of the antigen-reactive cell was known, the hypothesis has proved to be remarkably accurate in its predictions. Central to the theory is the prediction that natural antibody exists prior to exposure to an antigen, and that the subsequent response is composed of antibody that is identical to that which interacts with the antigen in the first place. This study was undertaken to test this prediction by examining the antigen-specific antibody response to preformed immune complexes. Specifically, we wished to determine whether the response to the antigen is influenced by allotypic or idiotypic determinants on the antibody used to form the immune complex. Our approach has been to examine the immunogenicity of preformed antigen/antibody complexes in strains of mice that have different immunoglobulin heavy chain allotypes and in strains that express either high or low levels of the relevant idiotype. In the network theory, Jerne suggested (2) that recognition of self-idiotopes forms the basis of an immunoregulatory network.
    [Show full text]
  • Idiotypes Advanced Article
    Idiotypes Advanced article Aysegul Uner, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Article Contents . Introduction Jerrie Gavalchin, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA . Structure and Expression of Idiotypes . Classification of Idiotypes Idiotypes, the unique and characteristic determinants of an immunoglobulin or T cell . Function of Idiotypes receptor, can function as antigens. Anti-idiotypic responses, which include anti-idiotypic . Idiotypic Network in Health and Disease antibody-producing B cells and idiotype-specific T cells, form a network of immune cells that regulate their production. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000912 Introduction as a B-cell network in which interactions between lympho- The idiotypic network hypothesis, formulated by Niels cytes required complementary V-region structures present Jerne in 1974, postulates that the immune response may be on antibody molecules. This has been expanded to include regulated by responses to idiotypes, unique determinants T cells and their TCR, which are key to the production of originally described on B cell, and now also on T-cell immunoglobulin and regulation of the immune system. receptors. This thesis is based on the dual characteristics of The immunogenicity of idiotypes expressed on immuno- the B- and T-cell receptors (BCR and TCR, respectively), globulins was one of the first observations in support of the such that they both react with an antigen through their idiotypic network theory. Cross-species immunization antigen-binding sites, but may also be recognized by anti- demonstrated that antigenic determinants on the antibody idiotypic antibody and anti-idiotypic T cells. These inter- could be xenotypic (between species), allotypic (between actions create a network of clones of B and T cells that different strains of the same species), or idiotypic (specific express distinct idiotypic specificities that interact with for a given clone in an individual).
    [Show full text]
  • Recapitulation of the Anti-Idiotype Antibodies As Vaccine Candidate Ahsan Naveed1*, Sajjad Ur Rahman1, Muhammad Imran Arshad1 and Bilal Aslam2
    Naveed et al. Translational Medicine Communications (2018) 3:1 Translational Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-018-0021-4 Communications REVIEW Open Access Recapitulation of the anti-Idiotype antibodies as vaccine candidate Ahsan Naveed1*, Sajjad Ur Rahman1, Muhammad Imran Arshad1 and Bilal Aslam2 Abstract The foreign antigen that enters into the body is detected by the immune system through antigen presenting cells leading to the production of antibodies. The use of anti-idiotype antibodies is a new way to excite the immune response that identifies and eliminates the foreign antigens entered into the body. These Anti-idiotype antibodies have the ability to decrease the non-specific binding of the antigenic protein epitopes because of high specificity for the antigenic determinants. The anti-idiotype antibodies attach to the paratope of idiotype antibody and stimulate a precise immune reaction same as that of external antigen. The anti-idiotype antibodies are the peerless therapeutic candidate as they mimic the antigenic structure and potentiate antibody and cell-mediated immunity. Even in the absence of foreign antigen, these anti-idiotype antibodies have the potential to provide long-lasting immunity. The present review is about immune regulations by anti-idiotype antibodies with some success therapeutic stories. The previous research analysis is evidence of anti-idiotype antibodies as an excellent candidate for the development of both human and animal vaccines although it has some gaps that are needed to be addressed. Keywords: Anti-idiotype, Immunity, Vaccines, Antigens Background Structural analysis of antibody The Immune system is strong defense against invading The immune system starts producing antibodies when- pathogens, a number of different ways are adopted at ever it recognizes any foreign element in the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Article: Idiotypes and Anti-Idiotypes
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.47.9.705 on 1 September 1988. Downloaded from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1988; 47, 705-707 Leading article: Idiotypes and anti-idiotypes: What are they trying to tell us? A cardinal feature of the immune system is its ability Abl and Ab3 antibodies and that immunisation with to generate an enormous number of different Ab2 preferentially stimulates direct expression of antibodies (approximately 100 million in the VH germline genes.4 Furthermore, Ab2 may bear mouse). 1 Antibodies are classically identified by structural similarity to the stimulating antigen their antigen binding properties. A second method because the combining site of Abl will be comple- ofdescribing antibodies serologically is by an analysis mentary to a structure on the antigen and the of their idiotypes. The variable (V) region of the combining site on Ab2 will be complementary to immunoglobulin molecule was first shown to be that on Abl. The amino acid sequence of reovirus antigenic by the injection of V region polypeptides haemagglutinin (antigen) has a region of sequence into experimental animals.2 These antigenic deter- homology with the light chain of anti-anti-haemag- minants are known as idiotopes and collectively glutinin (anti-idiotype Ab2).5 The immune system comprise the idiotype. The three dimensional shape may therefore have within the idiotype network an of the idiotype may involve structures on either the internal image of potential antigens available before heavy or light chains or both. Idiotypes can be meeting an antigen for the first time. This notion is divided into two main types based on their precise being extensively investigated to determine whether location within the variable region: (a) those located anti-idiotypes may have a role as vaccines.
    [Show full text]