DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the High Peak Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the High Peak Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the High Peak Council electoral review This PDF document contains 14 Submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 High Peak District Personal Details: Name: Nic Bridge E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: The High Peak Wards are okay and the 43 Councillors are, too. However, the High Peak Parish Wards of "Chinley, Buxworth and Brownside [Chinley]" and "Chapel-en-le-Frith [Chapel]", are NOT okay. "Chinley" needs to include the hamlet of "Whitehough" because it is so close to Chinley village; shops, railway station, schools, children's playgrounds etc. More importantly, because a huge housing development has just gained Outline Planning Permission for the old 'Dorma' factory site; for some 320+ houses!! 'New residents' in that development would have a very strong identity, with "Chinley" and the local community of "Chinley". For perspective, there are currently, approximately 1150 dwellings in the whole of "Chinley, Buxworth and Brownside" Parish. Hence, 320+ more dwellings, is a massive invasion of and infrastructure / resource-strain for this locality. Financially, "Chinley" parish would be significantly worse-off, IF "Whithough" and the planned new development, were to remain in "Chapel" Parish. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2623 22/11/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2623 22/11/2013 Hinds, Alex From: Egan, Helen Sent: 16 December 2013 12:09 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: High Peak ER-Boundary Consultation for High Peak 4 of 4 From: vicky brown Sent: 15 December 2013 13:05 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary Consultation for High Peak I am a resident of Shirebrook Park in Glossop, Derbyshire. I understand that you are consulting on where the boundaries should be for different areas in the High Peak. We are currently represented within the Old Glossop ward but I feel it would benefit Shirebrook to have its own councillor as the demographic on the estate is completely different to that of Old Glossop. (Shirebrook is a family estate in the main, with residents commuting out of the area to work.) I feel having a separate councillor would make it easier for the councillor to address issues that affect Shirebrook (such as speeding within the estate, school provision, lack of grit bins on the estate etc). Should you need my address, my details are V Brown, . Please note I do not want to receive any junk mail. Kind regards, Victoria Brown 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 High Peak District Personal Details: Name: Jamie Douglas E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: As someone who lives in Glossop, I want to make a few proposals for the ward boundaries for the Glossop area. Firstly, I don't see any reason why Shirebrook should still be part of Old Glossop; everyone knows it's a completely separate area and nothing like Old Glossop, so it should have it's own ward. In my opinion it's perfect for having it's own ward - Hurst Brook separates it from the rest of the ward, it has its own separate identity and it looks like it'd be big enough for it's own ward now the estate has been completed. Secondly, I think it's very odd that Gamesley ward doesn't cover the whole of Gamesley estate. I guess the estate may be too big to all be in one ward, but I do think as much of it as possible should be in its own ward, rather than being in Hadfield South ward. Gamesley has a really good community, with their own residents association and community events such as bonfire nights and things like that, so having more of the estate in Gamesley ward would surely be better for them? I know I'd think it was daft if I lived on Gamesley estate but wasn't in Gamesley ward - it just seems such an odd boundary. Talking of odd boundaries, I think the boundary between Hadfield North and Hadfield South should be changed too. It just makes no sense at the moment - it splits an area of Hadfield that should be together in the same ward. In my opinion it should be Hadfield North that's the two seat ward, with Hadfield South being the one-seat ward. That would make more sense, as the southern part of Hadfield South ward is definitely different to the northern part of the ward. It'd probably be easier to find a natural boundary for them somewhere around there too, as there's a bit of a break where there's a river, before you get to the proper southern part of Hadfield. Looking at numbers, obviously some of Padfield ward should be put into Hadfield North ward - Padfield is massive at the moment, but that's easy to fix, as there's a bit of Hadfield in Padfield ward, and some of that could move across quite easily. Simmondley also looks to be too big, so I think the bits of Simmondley ward that aren't actually part of Simmondley - like Charlestown and Dinting Vale - should be moved out of it. That'd make it smaller. Oh and isn't Old Glossop too big as well at the moment? I don't see why King Edward Avenue and Riverside Close and the roads around there are in it, they're on the same little estate as roads near it which are in Howard Town ward! They should be moved out of Old Glossop into Howard Town ward, which would make Old Glossop smaller. But don't forget about Shirebrook! It's daft that Shirebrook is still part of Old Glossop ward. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2744 30/12/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2744 30/12/2013 Hinds, Alex From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 17 December 2013 09:10 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Councillor for Shirebrook Estate in Glossop From: Fred Evans Sent: 16 December 2013 17:56 To: Reviews@ Subject: Councillor for Shirebrook Estate in Glossop Dear Sir/Madam I believe the residents of the Shirebrook estate in Glossop should have their own local councillor. The estate has grown to over 600 houses in the past 30 years but local representation reflects the previous topography. Kind regards Fred Evans 1 Hinds, Alex From: Buck, Richard Sent: 23 December 2013 09:40 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Review of High Peak Boundary - Hadfield South Ward Hi Alex – Another submission for High Peak… From: STEPHEN FOOTE Sent: 20 December 2013 16:18 To: Reviews@ Subject: Review of High Peak Boundary - Hadfield South Ward In your review of the boundaries of the High Peak Council can I ask you to make a special look at the current ward boundary of Hadfield South Ward. At present it comprises mainly residents of Hadfield but a sizeable number of people living in Gamesley. The two areas have totally different communities and different needs. Superficially on the map they appear to be about a mile from each other but there is a huge valley in between and, because of this, people living in Hadfield would rarely, if ever, go to Gamesley and visa versa. There is no need to. Children of Hadfield go to Hadfield primary schools and those in Gamesley to either Gamesley or Charlesworth schools. Each area has its own Children's Centre and Nursery school. People in Hadfield would do their shopping either in Hadfield or Glossop never Gamesley. There is no public transport that I am aware that connect the two areas other than taking a bus or train into Glossop and then getting another bus out of Glossop. Those people living in Gamesley can, if they so want, be a member of the Gamesley Residents Association, Hadfield residents could not. Hadfield does not in itself have a residents association, the nearest thing is perhaps either the Hadfield and Padfield Heritage Trail or Friends of Hadfield Hall (a large building in the centre of Hadfield) which a group of us have bought back into Community use for the residents of Hadfield to use for social and community group usage. This Hall is used extensively by the Community and to my knowledge (and I am the Booking Secretary) it has never been used by Gamesley Residents. I appreciate that the change to the boundary will have some knock-on effects on electoral numbers and I would personally welcome Hadfield South becoming wholly within the Hadfield area and being reduced to a one seat ward. Consideration might be given to drawing the boundary between Hadfield South and North using either the river (between Higher Barn Road and Lower Barn Road) or Woolley Bridge Road/Hadfield Road. This "new" ward would have I suspect 95% of the property built in Hadfield since 1960 and these residents often have the same issues, anti-social behaviour, lack of amenities, dog fouling, council tax rises (newer houses tend to be put in a higher council tax band). If a new Hadfield South ward was created then the Councillor (whoever was elected) could concentrate their time and energy dealing with problems faced by residents in just one area, the southern area of Hadfield.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peak Sub Region
    Peak Sub Region Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report to Derbyshire Dales District Council, High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority June 2009 ekosgen Lawrence Buildings 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 STUDY INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................... 5 ROLE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 8 REPORT STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 10 2 SHLAA GUIDANCE AND STUDY METHODOLOGY..................................................... 12 SHLAA GUIDANCE................................................................................................................. 12 STUDY METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................... 13 3 POLICY CONTEXT.......................................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18 NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND
    [Show full text]
  • HP Councillors Initiative Fund 2018
    High Peak Borough Council Councillor's Initiative Fund 2018-2019 Projects Project Group Name Project Name Total Agreed £ Councillor(s) Ward Ref CIF CIF 2 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 650.00 100.00 Longos, Nick Padfield 100.00 Hardy, Paul Old Glossop 200.00 Kelly, Ed Hadfield North 250.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town CIF 3 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 200.00 Wharmby, Jean Dinting CIF 4 Dove Holes Cricket Club Upgrading of security 250.00 Roberts, Peter Limestone Peak lighting CIF 5 Gloss Group Social Activities Project 200.00 Wharmby, Jean Dinting CIF 6 Tintwistle Ladies Well Dressing 200.00 Jenner, Pat Tintwistle CIF 7 GYGs - Gamesley Youth GYGs 80.00 McKeown, Anthony Gamesley Gatherings CIF 8 People of Whitfield Whitfield Food Club 200.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield CIF 9 Buxton Town Team Fairfield Road – Gateway 350.00 Quinn, Rachael Barms to Buxton CIF 10 Eat Well Glossop CIC Eat Well Whitfield 400.00 200.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield 100.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town 100.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town CIF 11 Wellbeing Group Social Activities 250.00 Fox, Andrew Whaley Bridge CIF 12 Glossop Arts Project “Arts for Wellbeing” 100.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town CIF 13 Harpur Hill Residents Harpur Hill Community 150.00 Grooby, Linda Cote Heath Association Fun Day CIF 14 Glossopdale Foodbank Glossopdale Foodbank 125.00 Claff, Godfrey Howard Town CIF 15 Glossopdale Foodbank Glossopdale Foodbank 320.00 80.00 Greenhalgh, Damien Howard Town 80.00 Oakley, Graham Whitfield 80.00 Hardy, Paul Old Glossop 80.00 Kelly, Ed Hadfield
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolsover, North East Derbyshire & Chesterfield
    ‘extremewheels roadshows’ Summer 2017 BOLSOVER, NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE & CHESTERFIELD JULY 15th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 15th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 24th Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 15th Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 25th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 15th Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 25th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 16th Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 25th Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 17th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 25th Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 17th Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 27th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 17th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 27th Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 18th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 27th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 18th Shirebrook - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 28th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 22nd Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm AUGUST 22nd Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 1st Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 22nd Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 1st Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 22nd Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 1st Chesterfield - Queens Park 6 - 8pm 24th Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 1st Mickley - Community Hut 6 - 8pm 24th Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 2nd Hasland - Eastwood Park 1 - 3pm 25th Bolsover - Hornscroft Park 6 - 8pm 2nd Pilsley - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 25th Shirebrook - Skatepark 6 - 8pm 3rd Whitwell - Skatepark 1 - 3pm 29th Chesterfield - Stand Rd Rec Ground 1 - 3pm 3rd Grassmoor - Barnes Park 1 - 3pm 29th Tupton - Rugby Club 1 - 3pm 3rd Hasland - Eastwood Park 6 - 8pm 29th Chesterfield - Queens Park
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPORTED LIVING Emma / Resident ACROSS DERBYSHIRE
    “ EMH are the most friendly @emhcare people I know. I get on @emhcareandsupport with them very well and @emh_care_and_support we go out for meals together. My flat is bigger that the old one I lived in, it is perfect now, especially with my new boiler.” SUPPORTED LIVING Emma / Resident ACROSS DERBYSHIRE WHERE YOU CAN FIND US We provide housing across Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire IN DERBYSHIRE… for people with a wide range of needs, including learning difficulties, physical disabilities, complex needs (including dual GLOSSOP diagnosis), mental health concerns, sensory impairments PEAK and autistic spectrum disorders. NEW MILLS KILLAMARSH DISTRICT CLOWNE BUXTON CHESTERFIELD BOLSOVER BAKEWELL CLAY CROSS SHIREBROOK MATLOCK ALFRETON DERBY CONTACT US For more information please call our Housing Team on: T. 01158 508 507 / M. 07833 046 107 E. [email protected] GRASSMOOR Visit: www.emhcareandsupport.org.uk emh care & support is part of emh group FLEXIBILITY AND CHOICE Our highly personalised Our Housing team can: services are individually e Provide advice on how to keep tailored to meet the specific your home safe and secure e needs of each and every Help with applying for housing benefits person we support. We are e Assist with reporting repairs able to offer shared or e Sign post to other agencies single occupancy and have e Support with completing property available across applications for grants and aids Derbyshire. & adaptations We provide housing and care to improve opportunities for people We help vulnerable people live an enjoyable, “ I like living in my flat independent life by advocating on their behalf because I have been able to or by providing activities, support, care, and choose what décor and furniture I like.
    [Show full text]
  • MBC Event Start Sheet.Indd
    EVENT KUDOS SERIES 3 MBC OPEN 10 MILE TIME TRIAL 05 APRIL2021 J10/HQ: BUXWORTH PRIMARY SCHOOL | DERBYSHIRE1 MEN’S RECORD HELD BY SCOTT DAVIES 19:15 WOMEN’S RECORD HELD BY ALEX DECK 23:01 PROMOTED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF CYCLING TIME TRIALS UNDER ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS EVENT MBC KUDOS SERIES OPEN 10 MILE TIME TRIAL 3 Thank you for entering the Manchester Bicycle Club Open 10 mile TT, event 3 of the Bioracer Kudos Series. It is highly recommended riders familiarise themselves with the HQ, additional parking, toilet facilities and the start location. EVENT SECRETARY RESERVES Alexander Royle Please send apologies either by e-mail or 14 Blackbrook Drive, Chinley, High Peak, phone to the event secretary at the earliest opportunity if you are unable to ride in Derbyshire, SK23 6BF the event. This will enable early allocation Mobile: 07734447523 of reserve slots to help the organiser and Email: [email protected] reserve riders plan better. EVENT HQ - OPEN 7:00am BUXWORTH PRIMARY SCHOOL Limited parking available at HQ Station Road, Buxworth Limited toilet facilities available at HQ High Peak, Derbyshire No Changing facilities available at the event HQ SK23 7NJ No refreshments are available from the event HQ ADDITIONAL TOILETS: Tesco Superstore also has toilet facilities and is open from 8:00am (Bridgemont, Whaley Bridge, High Peak, SK23 7PB). Do not urinate in public spaces. Do not park on the main road (B6062) in Buxworth village outside the HQ. Riders must park safely and remain courteous to residents, road users and other members of the public at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Guided Walks and Folk Trains in the High Peak and Hope Valley
    High Peak and Hope Valley January – April 2020 Community Rail Partnership Guided Walks and Folk Trains in the High Peak and Hope Valley Welcome to this guide It contains details of Guided Walks and Folk Trains on the Hope Valley, Buxton and Glossop railway lines. These railway lines give easy access to the beautiful Peak District. Whether you fancy a great escape to the hills, or a night of musical entertainment, let the train take the strain so you can concentrate on enjoying yourself. High Peak and Hope Valley This leaflet is produced by the High Peak and Hope Valley Community Rail Partnership. Community Rail Partnership Telephone: 01629 538093 Email: [email protected] Telephone bookings for guided walks: 07590 839421 Line Information The Hope Valley Line The Buxton Line The Glossop Line Station to Station Guided Walks These Station to Station Guided Walks are organised by a non-profit group called Transpeak Walks. Everyone is welcome to join these walks. Please check out which walks are most suitable for you. Under 16s must be accompanied by an adult. It is essential to have strong footwear, appropriate clothing, and a packed lunch. Dogs on a short leash are allowed at the discretion of the walk leader. Please book your place well in advance. All walks are subject to change. Please check nearer the date. For each Saturday walk, bookings must be made by 12:00 midday on the Friday before. For more information or to book, please call 07590 839421 or book online at: www.transpeakwalks.co.uk/p/book.html Grades of walk There are three grades of walk to suit different levels of fitness: Easy Walks Are designed for families and the occasional countryside walker.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Council Guide for Residents
    CHAPEL-EN-LE-FRITH PARISH WELCOME PACK TITLE www.chapel-en-le-frithparishcouncil.gov.uk PARISH COUNCILGUIDE FOR RESIDENTS Contents Introduction The Story of Chapel-en-le-Frith 1 - 2 Local MP, County & Villages & Hamlets in the Parish 3 Borough Councillors 14 Lots to Do and See 4-5 Parish Councillors 15 Annual Events 6-7 Town Hall 16 Eating Out 8 Thinking of Starting a Business 17 Town Facilities 9-11 Chapel-en-le-Frith Street Map 18 Community Groups 12 - 13 Village and Hamlet Street Maps 19 - 20 Public Transport 13 Notes CHAPEL-EN-LE-FRITH PARISH WELCOME PACK INTRODUCTION Dear Resident or Future Resident, welcome to the Parish of Chapel-en-le-Frith. In this pack you should find sufficient information to enable you to settle into the area, find out about the facilities on offer, and details of many of the clubs and societies. If specific information about your particular interest or need is not shown, then pop into the Town Hall Information Point and ask there. If they don't know the answer, they usually know someone who does! The Parish Council produces a quarterly Newsletter which is available from the Town Hall or the Post Office. Chapel is a small friendly town with a long history, in a beautiful location, almost surrounded by the Peak District National Park. It's about 800 feet above sea level, and its neighbour, Dove Holes, is about 1000 feet above, so while the weather can be sometimes wild, on good days its situation is magnificent. The Parish Council takes pride in maintaining the facilities it directly controls, and ensures that as far as possible, the other Councils who provide many of the local services - High Peak Borough Council (HPBC) and Derbyshire County Council (DCC) also serve the area well.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Reduction & Community Safety Group Tilley Awards 2008
    Crime Reduction & Community Safety Group Tilley Awards 2008 Application form Please ensure that you have read the guidance before completing this form. By making an application to the awards, entrants are agreeing to abide by the conditions laid out in the guidance. Please complete the following form in full, within the stated word limit and ensuring the file size is no more than 1MB. Failure to do so will result in your entry being rejected from the competition. Completed application forms should be e-mailed to [email protected]. All entries must be received by noon on Friday 25th April 2008. No entries will be accepted after this time/date. Any queries on the application process should be directed to Alex Blackwell on 0207 035 4811. Section A: Application basics 1. Title of the project: The Thickley Bank Project/Partnership Intervention at Neighbourhood Level 2. Key issue that the project is addressing e.g. Alcohol related violence: Alcohol related crime, anti social behaviour, general disorder, criminal damage, secondary fires and lack of community confidence. Author contact details 3. Name of application author: Councillor Brian R. Murray-Carr 4. Organisation submitting the application: Bolsover Community Safety Partnership 5. Full postal address: Bolsover District Council, Sherwood Lodge, Bolsover, Derbyshire, S44 6NF 6. Email address: [email protected] 7. Telephone number: 01246 242589 Secondary project contact details 8. Name of secondary contact involved in the project: Carolyn Bowen 9. Secondary contact email address: [email protected] 10. Secondary contact telephone number: 01246 242589 Page 1 of 9 The Thickley Bank Project/Partnership Intervention at Neighbourhood Level Endorsing representative contact details 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Marple Locks Trail
    MARPLE LOCKS - A HISTORY Canal builders would, as far as possible, always use This problem was overcome by the construction of a local materials. In the case of the Peak Forest Canal, an tramroad which started near Oldknow's lime kilns, ran ample supply of stone was readily available in the across what is now Strines Road, cut across the corner of Marple Locks are situated on the Peak Forest Canal in district and this was used almost exclusively in the the present Recreation Ground and along the banking Marple Cheshire. construction of lock chambers and bridges. The canals which can still be identified near the children's play The Peak Forest Canal runs from Buxworth in were "cut" by gangs of men using picks, shovels and area. From there it went towards the modern St. Derbyshire, where an arm also services nearby Whaley wheelbarrows. The skilled diggers were called cutters or Martin's Road but turned to cross the canal at lock 10 Bridge, through Furness Vale, New Mills and Disley to bankers and the unskilled, labourers, although soon near the Tollgate Cottage. The grooved support stones Marple. Here it is joined by the Macclesfield Canal. At they all became known as Navigators or "Navvies" for for the rails and the holes for the wooden pegs which Marple the canal descends a flight of sixteen locks, short. The locks were built by masons and the lock gates held them in place can still be seen. The route then lowering the level by 210 feet before crossing 100 feet by carpenters or joiners.
    [Show full text]
  • Shirebrook Academy
    SHIREBROOK ACADEMY COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED 31 AUGUST 2014 REGISTERED NUMBER: 06628631 SHIREBROOK ACADEMY COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED 31 AUGUST 2014 C O N T E N T S Page Reference and administration details 1 - 4 Governors Annual Report 5 -15 Governance statement 16 - 19 Statement on Regularity, Propriety, and Compliance 20 Statement of Governors’ responsibilities 21 Independent auditor's report to the members 22 - 23 Independent reporting accountant’s assurance 24 - 25 report on regularity to Shirebrook academy trust limited and the Education Funding Agency Statement of financial activities (incorporating the 26 - 27 income and expenditure account) Balance sheet 28 - 29 Cash flow statement 30 Accounting policies 31 - 35 Notes to the financial statements 35 - 54 SHIREBROOK ACADEMY COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS YEAR ENDED 31 AUGUST 2014 REGISTERED CHARITY NAME: Shirebrook Academy COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 06628631 (England and Wales) PRINCIPAL OFFICE: Common Lane Shirebrook NG20 8QF REGISTERED OFFICE: Derbyshire County Council County Hall Matlock Derbyshire DE4 3AG THE GOVERNORS: * Members of the Finance Committee Ms J S Bloor (Principal and Accounting Officer)* † Sponsor Governor Mr S West * † (Chairman from 1 September 2013) Mr A P Brickles* † Mr R S Ibbotson † Mr G A Warrener † Mr M Beck* (Co-opted Governor, appointed 25 September 2013, became Sponsor Governor 29 September 2014) † Dr M Mitton (Staff Governor,
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire. 81
    DIRECTORY.] DERBYSHIRE. CHAPEL-EX-LE-FRITH. 81 The nparest money order & telegraph office is at in 1872, enlarged in 1889, for 160 children; averag9 Spondon attendance, 96 mixed & 5 I infants; Edward Willett», Church of England (mixed & infants), School, erected master co~nIEnCIAL. Hunt Ebenezer, farmer FRIVATE RESIDE~TS. Allen Thr.mas, farmer & butcher Jacksl)n William, farmer, Brook farm Longaon Joseph Argile ·William, farmer Lano George H. farmer, Roe farm Martin Miss .A.shworth Jas. mining engnr. Highfld Martin Charles, farmer, 'The Moor Whinyates Col. Francis Arthur, The Best w':~k John, fsrmer, Hill :"'layer \"'m. farmer & horse de:l1er :Moor house nwison \Villiam, blacksmith Older.;;h~w .Tohn & George, builders Wilmot Col. Sir Henry bart. V. C., Doncaster vVilliam, carter Oldershaw Herbert, butcher & farmer, C.R, D.L., J.P. Chaddesden hall; Green \Yilliam, tailor, The Moor Cherry Tree hill &; Carlton & Arthur's club~, Lon- Ihynes John, \Yhitehurst, 'Vilmot Painter Joseph, farmer don SW Ar:ns P.H Smith Thomas Seth, farmer Wilmot Rev. l'rancis Edmund \1'il- Hodg1dn William, wheelwright Webb John, market gardener Earn M.A. (vicar) Holmes Robert, farmer Whitman Miss Mary A. shopkeeper CHAPEL-EN-LE-FRITH is a small market and of the late Henry Constantine Renshaw esq. J.P. by whom un'ion town and head of a county court district and it was rebuilt on the site of an ancient house, is at present parish, 6 miles north from Buxton and 166 from. London (1895) unoccupied. Bowden Hall, the property of the by road, in the High Peak division of the county, hun- Rev.
    [Show full text]