DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia's World Natural Heritage Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia's World Natural Heritage Sites No. 40 Fall 2005/Winter 2006 Special Issue: Russia's World Natural Heritage Sites • Lake Baikal to be Spared Pipeline Threat • A Transportation Corridor through the Ukok Plateau? • Russia and Mongolia Collaborate to Preserve the Uvs Nuur Basin PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (A Letter from the Editors) ....1 Contacts, Welcomes International Guests ....................23 INTRODUCTION TO WORLD NATURAL GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI.....................................................26 HERITAGE SITES IN RUSSIA Examining Alternative Development Scenarios World Natural Heritage Sites in Russia.............................2 for the Ukok Plateau ...................................................................27 The Benefits of World Heritage Status WESTERN CAUCASUS...........................................................................30 in Russian Practice.......................................................................... 4 Extending the Western Caucasus World UNESCO's World Heritage List and Heritage Site: Plans and First Steps ..................................31 the Place of Russian Natural Territories on It .......... 7 CENTRAL SIKHOTE-ALIN ...................................................................34 International Seminar Attracts Specialists to Discuss Alternative Nature World Heritage Status for Unique Territories Use on World Natural Heritage Sites.................................9 in the Bikin River Valley?............................................................35 Russian-German Collaboration in Protecting UVS NUUR BASIN .................................................................................36 World Heritage.................................................................................11 Russia and Mongolia Collaborate to Preserve CASE STUDIES: WORLD HERITAGE STATUS the Uvs Nuur Basin.......................................................................37 AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR RUSSIA’S NATURAL SYSTEM OF WRANGEL ISLAND RESERVE................39 PROTECTED AREAS Overcoming a Difficult Period of Transition An Introduction ..............................................................................12 in the Russian High Arctic.......................................................40 VIRGIN KOMI FORESTS ......................................................................13 THE FUTURE Protecting Territory and Developing Tourism in Yugyd Va National Park......................................................14 World Natural Heritage Sites in Russia: Future Prospects ............................................................................................. 42 LAKE BAIKAL ...........................................................................................17 Spotlight on Russia's Tentative List..................................43 Oil Pipeline Construction Threatens Lake Baikal ..........................................................................................18 TABLE OF RUSSIA'S WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE SITES............................Rear Inside Cover VOLCANOES OF KAMCHATKA...........................................................22 Klyuchevskoi Nature Park Establishes International CONSERVATION CONTACTS.............Back Cover The mission of the Center for Russian Nature Russian Conservation News is produced with support form many wonderful Conservation (CRNC) is to promote the conservation conservation-minded people! We could not do our work without you! of nature in Russia and throughout the former Soviet Special thanks to: Gerard Boere, Dave Cline & Olga Romanenko, Evelyn Union, and to assist conservation groups in that Cochran, Harriet Crosby, Susan Helms Daley, Winslow Duke, Bernt Dybern, region through information exchange, coordination Brock Evans, Matthew Foley, Carol Foss, Kevin Gilligan, Freeborn Jewett, of professional and education exchanges, and provi- George Johnson, Mati Kaal, Nadezhda Kavrus-Hoffman, Eliza Klose, Richard sion of technical assistance to protected areas. CRNC Lanier (Trust for Mutual Understanding), Phyllis Lathrope, Thomas McCorkle is a project of the Tides Center. & Brook Stevens, Richard McQuire, Mary Anne Mekosh, Kazuo Morimoto, Lois Morrison, Gordon Orians, Peyton Owston, Jose Vasco Sousa, Hunter & Lois Staley, Greg Streveler, Townsend Swayze, Thomas Van Pelt, William & Susan Wasch, Gary Waxmonsky, Don & Patricia Weeden, and Fred Welty. RCN has many partners and friends in Russia, including the Partnership for Zapovedniks, whose mission is to offer organizational, technical, and financial help to zapovedniks and national parks © Copyright 2006 CRNC/Tides Center. in Russia. ISSN 1026-6380 Fall 2005/Winter 2006, No. 40 Russian Conservation News World Natural Heritage Sites in the Russian Federation Selection Criteria processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh Until late 2004, when Russia's last natural site, Wrangel Island, was water, coastal, and marine ecosystems and communities of inscribed on the World Heritage List, properties were selected on plants and animals; the basis of six cultural and four natural criteria, with the protec- (iv) Contains the most important and significant natural habitats tion, management, authenticity, and integrity of properties also for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those being important considerations. According to UNESCO criteria, a containing threatened species of outstanding universal value property may be inscribed if it: from the point of view of science or conservation. (i) Contains superlative natural phenomena or areas of exception- al natural beauty and aesthetic importance; Note: In 2005, the selection criteria for cultural and natural sites were com- (ii) Represents major stages of earth's history, including the record bined into one list of criteria numbered (i)-(x), when the Operational of life, significant on-going geological processes in the develop- Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention were ment of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic revised. Under the current system, natural criteria (i)-(iv) detailed above are features; known as criteria (vii)-(x), respectively. It is under these new criteria that (iii) Represents significant on-going ecological and biological Russia's future World Natural Heritage sites will be inscribed. Fall 2005/Winter 2006, No. 40 CONSERVATION CONTACTS “Altai-21st Century” Public Charitable Fund. Mikhail Shishin, President. Magadansky Zapovednik. Ulitsa Koltsevaya 17, Magadan, Russia Ulitsa Matrosova 120, Barnaul, Altaisky Krai, Russia 656052. 685000. Tel/Fax: +7 (413-22) 5-78-71. Email: [email protected] Tel: +7 (3852) 44-35-67. Tel/Fax: +7 (3852) 75-72-00. Email: [email protected] Natural Heritage Protection Fund. Aleksey Butorin, Director. Ulitsa Altaisky Biosphere Zapovednik. Artybash, Turachaksky District, Vyborgskaya, 8-3, Moscow, Russia 125212. Tel: +7 (910) 414-5315. Tel/Fax: Republic of Altai, Russia 649154. Tel/Fax: +7 (388-43) 2-74-35. +7 (495) 150 9293. Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.nhpfund.ru/en/ Email: [email protected], [email protected] Ostrov Vrangelya (Wrangel Island) Zapovednik. Ulitsa Obrucheva 27, Room Baikalo-Lensky Zapovednik. P.O. Box 3580, Ulitsa Baikalskaya 291B, Irkutsk, 63, Pevek, Chaunsky District, Chukotsky Autonomous Okrug, Russia 689400. Russia, 664050. Tel/Fax: +7 (395-2) 35-13-50. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Tel/Fax: +7 (427-37) 2-15-35. Email: [email protected] Baikalsky Biosphere Zapovednik. Tankhoi, Kabansky District, Republic of Pechoro-Ilychsky Biosphere Zapovednik. Yaksha, Troitsko-Pechorsky District, Buryatia, Russia 671220. Tel/Fax: +7 (301-38) 9-37-10, +7 (395-42) 36-1-63. Republic of Komi, Russia 169436. Tel/Fax: +7 (821-38) 9-50-91. Email: [email protected] Pribaikalsky National Park. P.O. Box 185, Microdistrict Yubeleiny 83A, Irkutsk, Barguzinsky Biosphere Zapovednik. Ulitsa Kozlova 61, Nizhneangarsk, Russia 664049. Tel/Fax: +7 (395-2) 39-63-18. Email: [email protected], Severo-Baikalsky District, Republic of Buryatia, Russia 671710. [email protected] Tel/Fax: +7 (301-30) 5-19-92. Email: [email protected] Putoransky Zapovednik. Ulitsa Komsomolskaya 1, Norilsk, Krasnoyarsky Krai, Daursky Biosphere Zapovednik. Ulitsa Komsomolskaya, Nizhnii Tsasuchei, Russia 663300. Tel/Fax: +7 (391-9) 46-53-26. Email: [email protected] Ononsky District, Chitinskaya Oblast, Russia 674480. Tel/Fax: +7 (302-52) 7-15-59. Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage. Nikolai Email: [email protected], [email protected] Maxakovsky, Senior Scientist. 2, Ulitsa Kosmonavtov, Moscow, Russia 129366. Dresden University of Technology. Professor Peter Schmidt. Faculty of Forestry, Tel: +7 (095) 686-13-19. Fax: +7 (095) 686-13-24. Email: [email protected]. Geosciences and Hydrosciences, Institute for General Ecology and Environmental Website: http://heritage-institute.ru/ Protection, P.O. Box 1117, D-01735 Tharandt, Germany. Tel: +49 (35203) 38- Sikhote-Alinsky Biosphere Zapovednik. Ulitsa Partizanskaya 44, Ternei, 31288. Fax: +49 (35203) 38-31266. Email: [email protected]. Terneisky District, Primorsky Krai, Russia 692150. Tel/Fax: +7 (423-74) 3-13-78. Website: http://www.forst.tu-dresden.de/Oekologie/indexeng.html Email: [email protected] Environmental Watch on the North Caucasus. Andrey Rudomakha, Tunkinsky National Park. Ulitsa Lenina 69, Kyren, Tunkinsky District, Republic Coordinator. Poselkovaya
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poaceae: Aveneae) in Northern Asia
    Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 11 (2) 2011 ISSN 1407 - 8953 ON THE ORIGIN OF SOME SPECIES OF THE GENUS AGROSTIS L. (POACEAE: AVENEAE) IN NORTHERN ASIA Ilya Enushchenko Enushchenko I. 2011. On the origin of some species of the genus Agrostis L. (Poaceae: Aveneae) in Northern Asia. Acta Biol. Universit. Daugavpil., 11 (2): 113-118. Critical revision of some species of the genus Agrostis L. (Poaceae: Aveneae) in Northern Asia was carried out. The paper considers the hybridization process within the genus. Suppositions about the kinship and origin of some species are made. New taxonomic rank A. bodaibensis, A. korczaginii, and A. ussuriensis is substantiated. Key words: Agrostis, Poaceae, hybrids, kinship, Northern Asia. Ilya Enushchenko. V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Bator, 1, 664033, Irkutsk, Russia, [email protected] INTRODUCTION Agraulus (Beauv.) Tzvel., and sect. Trichodium (Michx.) Dumort. The genus Agrostis L. includes about 150 species. It is one of the largest and most Species of the first section are characterized by polymorphic genera of the tribe Aveneae awnless (normally), less frequently aristate lem- Dumort., therefore it is considered taxo- mas. Callus hairs are generally more than 6 times nomically complex. Representatives of shorter than lemmas, more rarely are absent. the genus are distributed almost in all Paleae are 1.5 – 2 times shorter than lemmas. An- extratropical areas of both hemispheres; thers are 0.8 – 1.5 mm long. This section includes they also occur at high altitudes of the predominantly tetraploid (2n=28), more rarely tropics (Tsvelev 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Baikal Russian Federation
    LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x).
    [Show full text]
  • Buryat Cumhuriyeti'nin Turizm Potansiyeli Ve Başlıca
    SDÜ FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, AĞUSTOS 2021, SAYI: 53, SS. 136-179 SDU FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, AUGUST 2021, No: 53, PP. 136-179 Makale Geliş | Received : 07.06.2021 Makale Kabul | Accepted : 31.08.2021 Emin ATASOY Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Bölümü [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-6073-6461 Erol KAPLUHAN Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Coğrafya Bölümü [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-2500-1259 Yerbol PANGALİYEV [email protected] ORCID Numarası|ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-2392-4180 Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin Turizm Potansiyeli ve Başlıca Turizm Kaynakları Touristic Potential And Major Touristic Attractions Of Buryatia Republic Öz Rusya Federasyonu’nun Güney Sibirya Bölgesi’nde yer alan Buryat Cumhuriyeti, Saha Cumhuriyeti ve Komi Cumhuriyeti’nden sonra Rusya’nın en büyük yüzölçümüne sahip üçüncü özerk cumhuriyetidir. Siyasi yapılanma olarak Uzakdoğu Federal İdari Bölgesi, ekonomik yapılanma olarak ise Uzakdoğu İktisadi Bölge sınırları içinde yer alan Buryatya, Doğu Sibirya’nın güney kesimlerinde ve Moğolistan’ın kuzeyinde yer almaktadır. Araştırmada coğrafyanın temel araştırma metotları gözetilmiş, kaynak tarama yöntemi aracılığıyla ilgili kaynaklar ve yayınlar temin edilerek veri tabanı oluşturulmuştur. Elde edilen verilerin değerlendirilmesi için haritalar, şekiller ve tablolar oluşturulmuştur. Konunun net anlaşılması amacıyla Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin lokasyon, Buryat Cumhuriyeti Kültürel Turizm Merkezleri, Buryat Cumhuriyeti’nin Doğal turizm alanları, Buryat Cumhuriyeti milli parkları ve doğa koruma alanları haritalarının yanı sıra ifadeleri güçlendirmek için konular arasındaki bağlantılar tablo ile vurgulanmıştır. Tüm bu coğrafi olumsuzluklara rağmen, Buryatya zengin doğal kaynaklarıyla, geniş Tayga ormanlarıyla, yüzlerce göl ve akarsu havzasıyla, yüzlerce sağlık, kültür ve inanç merkeziyle, çok sayıda kaplıca, müze ve doğa koruma alanıyla, Rusya’nın en zengin turizm kaynaklarına sahip cumhuriyetlerinden biridir.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Current Tourism Trends on the Black Sea Coast
    CURRENT TOURISM TRENDS ON THE BLACK SEA COAST Minenkova Vera, Kuban State University, Russia Tatiana Volkova, Kuban State University, Russia Anatoly Filobok, Kuban State University, Russia Anna Mamonova, Kuban State University, Russia Sharmatava Asida, Kuban State University, Russia [email protected] The article deals with current trends of development of tourism on the Black Sea coast, related to geographical, economic, geopolitical factors. Key words: Black Sea coast, tourism and recreation complex, tourism, current trends. I. INTRODUCTION Black Sea coast has a number of natural features that define the high tourism and recreation potential of the territory. The unique combination of different resources defines the high tourism and recreation potential of the territory and creates conditions for the development of various forms of tourist activity. In view of the existing tourism industry (accommodation facilities, entertainment companies, etc.) and infrastructure we can talk about conditions for the development of almost all types of tourism: − cultural, educational and historical − health and resort − children − ecological − business − ethnographic − religious − agritourism (rural) − gastronomic and wine − active forms of tourism (diving, kitesurfing, hang-gliding, biking, caving, jeeping, rafting, horse riding, skiing and snowboarding, mountain climbing). II. TOURISM DEVELOPMENT FACTORS In general, current trends in the development of tourism on the Black Sea coast are determined by several factors: 1. The presence of significant historical and cultural potential and the unique culture of the local communities. According to archaeological evidence, the Caucasus is really to be considered one of the main points related to the "Cradle places of human civilization" (a series of sites of ancient human settlements in the Caucasus extends back over 300-350 thousand years).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Baikal (Russian Federation) (N 754)/ Lac Baïkal (Fédération De Russie) (N754)
    World Heritage 30 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 5 May / mai 2006 Original: English / anglais Distribution limited / limitée UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirtieth session / Trentième session Vilnius, Lithuania / Vilnius, Lituanie 08-16 July 2006 / 08-16 juillet 2006 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril REPORT OF THE JOINT UNESCO-IUCN REACTIVE MONITORING MISSION RAPPORT DE MISSION DE SUIVI REACTIF CONJOINTE DE L’UNESCO ET DE L’IUCN Lake Baikal (Russian Federation) (N 754)/ Lac Baïkal (Fédération de Russie) (N754) 21-31 October 2005 / 21-31 octobre 2005 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-06/30.COM/7A WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add WHC-06/30.COM/7B WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add 1 World Heritage Centre – IUCN Joint Mission to Lake Baikal World Heritage Property MISSION REPORT Reactive Monitoring Mission to Lake Baikal Russian Federation 21 – 31 October 2005 Pedro Rosabal (IUCN) Guy Debonnet (UNESCO) 2 Executive summary Following previous World Heritage Committee’s discussions on the State of Conservation of this property and, prompted by reports that works on a new oil pipeline started in May 2004 within the boundaries of the property, the World Heritage Committee at its 29th session (Durban, South Africa) requested a new monitoring mission to the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboudary Cooperation of Russian Cooperation Of
    MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Dauria International Protected TRANSBOUDARY Area Daursky Biosphere Reserve COOPERATION OF RUSSIAN OLGA KIRILYUK [email protected] PROTECTED AREAS TRANSBOUDARY COOPERATION OF RUSSIAN PROTECTED AREAS RF 2 The Russian Federation has a longest national borders in the World and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_area cross the different types of ecosystems Russia (Russian Federation) is one of the largest country in the world. RF shares land and maritime borders with more than 15 countries. Total length of borders is 62, 269 km. State borders cross several terrestrial and marine ecosystem types: from arctic to subtropical. Total area of all Russian PA is about 207 million hectares (11,4% ). Along Russian border territories are a lot of Protected areas among them about 30 are federal level PAs of I-IV categories of IUCN classification. Many of them have international significance (status). TRANSBOUDARY COOPERATION OF RUSSIAN PROTECTED AREAS 1 3 5 3 2 4 3. Only 5 official 1. “Friendship” (USSR-Finland), 1989; 2. Dauria (Russia-Mongolia-China), 1994; transboundary protected 3. “Ubsunur Hollow” (Russia-Mongolia), areas were created by 2003; intergovernmental 4. “Khanka Lake” (Russia-China), 2006; agreement: 5. “Altay” (Russia-Kazahstan), 2011. TRANSBOUDARY COOPERATION OF RUSSIAN PROTECTED AREAS 4 Russian - Finnish zapovednik «Friendship» Protects the boreal forest ecosystems •Kostomukshsky zapovednik (Russia), •Metsahalitus Forstyrelsen PA (Finland) Main aim of creation:
    [Show full text]
  • Migration: on the Move in Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Alaska Region Migration: On the Move in Alaska Volume 17, Issue 1 Alaska Park Science Volume 17, Issue 1 June 2018 Editorial Board: Leigh Welling Jim Lawler Jason J. Taylor Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Guest Editor: Laura Phillips Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Contributing Editor: Stacia Backensto Design: Nina Chambers Contact Alaska Park Science at: [email protected] Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at: www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Migration: On the Move in Alaska ...............1 Future Challenges for Salmon and the Statewide Movements of Non-territorial Freshwater Ecosystems of Southeast Alaska Golden Eagles in Alaska During the A Survey of Human Migration in Alaska's .......................................................................41 Breeding Season: Information for National Parks through Time .......................5 Developing Effective Conservation Plans ..65 History, Purpose, and Status of Caribou Duck-billed Dinosaurs (Hadrosauridae), Movements in Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th World Heritage Committee Session Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 16-27 June 2013
    Enhancing the IUCN World Heritage Programme II – Focus Europe 7-11 November 2013, Vilm, Germany 37th World Heritage Committee Session Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 16-27 June 2013 Boris Erg IUCN The 37th Session of the World Heritage Committee took place in the Kingdom of Cambodia, in Phnom Penh and Siem Reap-Angkor, from 16th to 27th June 2013. It was organized by UNESCO and the National Commission of Cambodia with the support of the Office of the Council of Ministers. World Heritage Committee The Committee is a governing body responsible for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. It decides on new inscriptions on the World Heritage List. It examines State of Conservation reports and also decides on the inscription or deletion of properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger. World Heritage Committee (ctd.) The 21 States Parties of the current World Heritage Committee are the following: Algeria, Cambodia, Colombia, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Germany, India, Iraq, Japan, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Qatar, Russian Federation, Senegal, Serbia, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, and United Arab Emirates. During the 19th session of the General Assembly (19-21 November 2013), 12 seats will have to be filled. Outgoing members in 2013 are: Cambodia, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Iraq, Mali, Mexico, Russian Federation, South Africa, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates. IUCN’s advisory role Ahead of the annual World Heritage Committee meeting, IUCN submits its recommendations regarding the inscriptions of new sites following a rigorous evaluation process through which it works with members on the ground, scientific experts, independent feedback and desk reviews. IUCN also submits “state of conservation” reports for sites under threat or sites that are already on the danger list or that it considers should be.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]