DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Author's Addendum Sanford G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Author's Addendum Sanford G Against the Grain Volume 20 | Issue 3 Article 21 June 2008 From the University Presses -- On the Author's Addendum Sanford G. Thatcher Penn State Press, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Thatcher, Sanford G. (2008) "From the University Presses -- On the Author's Addendum," Against the Grain: Vol. 20: Iss. 3, Article 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.2413 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. From the University Presses — On the Author’s Addendum Column Editor: Sanford G. Thatcher (Director, Penn State Press, USB 1, Suite C, 820 N. University Drive, University Park, PA 16802-1003; Phone: 814-865-1327; Fax: 814-863-1408) <[email protected]> www.psupress.org t has long been a tradition in scholarly turn in 2005 when a number of initiatives began to deposit publishing for authors to transfer all rights to coalesce around the idea of encouraging or them into Ito the publishers of their articles and even even requiring faculty to retain certain rights any disci- their books. The reason is simple: academic when they sign contracts with publishers. The pline-based authors do not live on the income generated by question to be asked is whether the use of an r e s e a r c h their scholarly publications, if they generate author’s addendum, at least as now formulated, repository any income at all, and with much else to absorb is truly in the best interest of higher education, (including their attention, they have not been motivated all things considered. And, in particular, what P u b M e d to bother about dealing with all the small mat- is the likely effect of this new practice going C e n t r a l , ters of business that are connected with the to be on university presses? the Nation- myriad of rights that fall within copyright, al Library such as responding to requests for permission How the Author’s Addendum of Medicine’s database for NIH-funded to reproduce an article in a coursepack, to Was Developed manuscripts).” (http://info-libraries.mit.edu/ quote a passage that is lengthy enough not to As it often has been in the arena of scholarly scholarly/mit-copyright-amendment-form). be covered by “fair use,” and to deal with for- communication, the University of California The reference to the NIH here is an acknowl- eign publishers seeking translation rights, just was among the pioneers in this effort. Its Aca- edgment that much of the impetus for the move to name a few. Nor are authors familiar with demic Senate appointed a Special Committee to devise and implement an author’s addendum the procedures for registering their copyrights, on Scholarly Communication, which produced came from the fierce struggle over the legisla- and few want to take the time to learn. Hence a number of white papers in December 2005. tion to mandate deposit of articles supported scholarly publishers have come to assume the (http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/sen- by NIH funding into PubMed Central and the role of serving as the author’s agent for these ate/committees/scsc/reports.html). One paper even broader open-access proposal embedded purposes, and they have professional staff proposed that all faculty, in signing contracts, in the Federal Research Public Access Act trained to know what normal business practices “transfer to publishers only the right of first of 2006. are and what rates to charge for various kinds publication, or at a minimum, retain rights Strong support for FRPAA, as publicly of uses. This tradition contrasts sharply with that allow postprint archiving and subsequent voiced in an open letter from the provosts of another tradition that exists in trade publishing, non-profit use.” It also urged that “faculty shall the Committee on Institutional Cooperation where most authors are represented by literary routinely grant to the Regents of the University (the Big Ten plus Chicago) in July 2006, car- agents who have the knowledge equivalent to of California a limited, irrevocable, perpetual, ried over to the CIC provosts’ endorsement that of trained publishing staff and can act on worldwide, non-exclusive license to place the later in 2006 of its own version of the author’s the author’s behalf in negotiating the sale of faculty member’s scholarly work in a non-com- addendum, which was very similar to MIT’s subsidiary rights. The difference, of course, mercial open-access repository for purposes form in retaining certain nonexclusive rights is that many trade-book authors do live on of online dissemination and preservation on for authors to make use of their works in their the income from their writing, including the behalf of the author and the public.” This pro- teaching and research activities and to post potentially large income that can come from posal was later slightly modified to define the them on their personal Websites, their own successful sales of book club, movie, TV, “scholarly work” affected by the policy as that institutional repositories, and any disciplinary audio, and foreign translation rights. “published in a scholarly journal or conference or funding agency sites connected with their Owing to the perceived “serials crisis” proceedings.” Also added was this provision: research (http://www.cic.uiuc.edu/groups/ that librarians became concerned about as far “Faculty may opt out of this requirement for CICMembers/archive/Report/AuthorsRights. back as the late 1960s when the first serious any specific work or invoke a specified delay shtml). The major difference is that the CIC studies of the impact of journal price increases before such work appears in an open-access addendum specifies a delay of six months after (especially in STM fields) on library budgets repository.” The Academic Senate’s Assembly publication before any posting of the “final were undertaken, however, there has been endorsed this proposal as thus modified on May published version” of the article to a publicly a growing movement fueled primarily by 10, 2006. Feedback received from the vari- accessible site. As of March 17, 2008, faculty libraries’ budget problems to “take back the ous UC system campuses over the following senates at nine of the twelve CIC universities copyrights.” As the standard argument goes, month, however, revealed a strong preference had officially endorsed use of the addendum, scholars produce the intellectual property for an opt-in approach instead of the opt-out which in the CIC version is entirely voluntary, embedded in their articles, then give it away mechanism included in the original proposal. not mandated by any opt-out approach. By far to publishers, who in turn charge increasingly And a survey of over 1,100 UC faculty released the most thorough discussion of the author’s steep prices to libraries to buy it back. Since in August 2007 showed that, for most faculty, addendum and the problems it is meant to scholars also provide peer review at no charge there was a disconnect between their attitudes address is provided on the Website of the to publishers, the perception is that the publish- and their behavior, with many expressing con- University of Wisconsin’s library, which ers’ business is being partially subsidized in cern about changes in the system of scholarly established an Office of Scholarly Communica- this way by university faculty, allowing them communication but most acting as they always tion and Publishing following a faculty senate to generate even higher profit margins than have with respect to their publishers and not resolution in 2005 to help educate faculty about they would otherwise be able to achieve. With believing it to be their problem but someone issues in scholarly communication (http://www. their backs to the wall, librarians have fought else’s (http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/re- library.wisc.edu/scp). back, principally through their associations, to sponses/activities.html). lobby for changes in copyright law and, more The MIT library also was an early pioneer Other major promoters of the author’s recently, to educate faculty to manage their and in January 2006 released its Copyright addendum have been the Association of own intellectual property more responsibly in Amendment Form, which “enables authors to College and Research Libraries through its the best interest of higher education as a whole, continue using their publications in their aca- Scholarly Communication Toolkit, SPARC, as they see it. This long struggle took a new demic work; to deposit them into DSpace; and continued on page 67 66 Against the Grain / June 2008 <http://www.against-the-grain.com> From the University Presses from page 66 and Science Commons, the latter an off- shoot of Creative Commons that focuses particularly on the needs of scientific com- munication. ACRL provides information in its Toolkit about the background of the crisis in scholarly communication, recent changes in 1]c\bS` the system including the “big deal” approach of commercial publishers to selling journal OaaSaa[S\bb]]Za content of which ACRL is very critical, the increasing consolidation of the industry, and [OYSWbSOagb] new alternatives for disseminating scholarship and managing copyrights (http://www.ala.org/ ]^bW[WhSbVSdOZcS ala/acrl/acrlissues/scholarlycomm/scholarly- communicationtoolkit/toolkit.cfm). With their own versions of an author’s addendum already ]TS`Sa]c`QSa developed, SPARC and Science Commons joined in a further effort in May 2007 to pro- vide new online tools “to simplify the process 1][^O`S`SacZbaPSbeSS\ of choosing and implementing an addendum RWTTS`S\b^`]dWRS`a to retain scholarly rights.” (http://www.arl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Publish Without Perishing: a Practical Handbook for Academic Authors. INSTITUTION National Education Association, Washington, D.C.; National Writers Union
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 342 021 CS 213 205 AUTHOR Benjaminson, Peter TITLE Publish without Perishing: A Practical Handbook for Academic Authors. INSTITUTION National Education Association, Washington, D.C.; National Writers Union. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8106-1544-4 PUB DATE 92 NOTE 135p.; Reference & Resource Series. AVAILABLE FROM NEA Professional Library. P.O. Box 509, West Haven, CT 06516 (Stock No. 1544-4-00, $16.95). PUB TYPE Guides - Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Copyrights7 Faculty Development; *Faculty Publishing; Higher Education; *Publishing Industry; *Publish or Perish Issue; Textbook Publication; *Writing for Publication IDENTIFIERS *Scholarly Writing ABSTRACT Providing a guide to academic authors with a manuscript in hand, this book explains the book publishing process step-by-step and provides examples of the actual experiences (good and bad) of academic authors. Chapters in the book are entitled: (1) It. Doesn't Have to Be This Way;(2) Agents: Can't Live with'Em, Can't Live without'Em;(3) Collaboration: Do You Want to Do It klone, or with Someone Else?;(4) Preparing Proposals;(5) Peer Review: A Long Walk on a Short One?;(6) Advances: It's What's Up Front That Counts; (7) Royalties: The King and Queenmakers;(8) Subventions: You Don't Pay, You Don't Play;(9) Copyright (Right) and Work for 114.re (Wrong); (10) Indexes and :ther Danger,..;(11) Subsidiary Rights: The Biggest Part is Underwater; (12) Dealing with Editors and Other Strangers; (13) Will It Be ±nookstores? Will Anyone Know It's There?; (14) Reprints and Remainderings: There Is Life after Termination; (15) Was It Good for You Too? Do You Want to Do It again? With the Same Publisher?;(16) Don't Fight: Grieve, Arbitrate, or Mediate; and (17) Never Give Up: Publish without Perishing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Role of Commercial Use in Copyright
    The Evolving Role of “For Profit” Use in Copyright Law: Lessons from the 1909 Act by Lydia Pallas Loren1 Copyright law in the United States has always involved a struggle for balance; a balance between granting rights to “authors” in their “writings” sufficient to provide the incentive to create and ensuring that those rights do not stifle the progress copyright law is designed to achieve. Whether described as designing “leaky rules” or designing rules that permit a certain amount of “free-riding,”2 the copyright law must build in a balance in order to achieve its underlying purpose of progress in knowledge and learning. The “free-riding” permitted by the Copyright Act is not an accident,3 but rather is integral to the design of an effective system meant to promote progress. The rights granted to copyright owners come at a cost borne the public in reduced access, use, and enjoyment of copyrighted works. How the legal rules define that balance has transformed over time. At first the rights granted were narrow, and the hurdles necessary to achieve those rights significant.4 Slowly, at first, the rights became greater and lasted for longer. A doctrine of “fair use” developed in the 1800s,5 pushing back on the expansion of rights and making sure that the rights remained limited so that progress could be achieved. Today the rights granted to copyright owners have expanded to a point beyond the wildest dreams of the founding fathers and fair use is called upon to do more and more to achieve the desperately needed balance in copyright 1 Jeffrey Bain Faculty Scholar and Professor of Law, Lewis and Clark Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • NSP Draft Contract
    PUBLISHING AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of DATE, between NO STARCH PRESS, INC. (“we” or “us”), located at 245 8th St., San Francisco, CA 94103, and AUTHOR (“you”), located at ADDRESS, concerning a literary work tentatively entitled WORKING TITLE (“Work”). The Work is described in Schedule A, attached to and made a part of this Agreement. The parties agree: 1. Grant of Rights and Term of This any deadline in your schedule, and we, in our sole Agreement. You grant, convey, and transfer to discretion, have not agreed in writing to extend Us the exclusive right to publish, distribute, and your deadline, we may terminate your sell the Work in whole or in part in print, Agreement, and you shall promptly return to us electronic, or any other form or medium, now any monies advanced or granted to you by us. known or hereafter developed, in all languages, throughout the world, for the duration of 4. Advances and Approval. We will pay you an copyright in the Work, which shall be the term of advance against royalties of $XXX as follows: this Agreement unless it is terminated sooner as the Agreement provides. “Electronic Form” shall include photographic, audio, video, digital, laser, $XXX on our acceptance of one-third magnetic, or any other form, and for any medium of the manuscript. now known or hereafter developed. You may publish excerpts from the Work or articles based $XXX on our acceptance of one-half of on the Work, provided that no individual excerpt the manuscript. represents more than ten percent (10%) of the entire Work, and that all such excerpts or articles $XXX on our acceptance of the balance contain appropriate references to the Work, of the manuscript, including any including a reference to us as its publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Author Initials Publisher
    Authors Place Publishing Agreement NM1000-03262020 Authors Place LLC Publishing Agreement INTRODUCTORY CLAUSES This PUBLISHING AGREEMENT (Agreement) between Authors Place LLC with its offices located at 9885 Wyecliff Drive, Suite 200, Highland Ranch 80126 (Publisher), and the following author, __________________________, (hereinafter called the “Author,” whose name and signature appear on this executed publishing agreement, is entered into as of ____________________________, 2020 and effective as of the date of the Author’s signature. WHEREAS, the Publisher and the Author wish respectively to publish the Author’s work, and, WHEREAS, the Author is submitting the Work, a single chapter of a book, to be published as part of an author compilation project which will be printed as a single book. The Author understands that the Work, in this case, is a chapter written by Author to be included in the compilation project with AT LEAST 20 other chapters written by other authors related to the same subject. The intention of the project is to produce a book that is both retail- ready and commercially distributed as a compilation of 20 or more chapters written by different authors under a single title (hereinafter called the “Project”). THEREFORE, they mutually agree as follows: GRANT OF RIGHTS 1. Grant of Rights The Author exclusively grants, assigns, and otherwise transfers to the Publisher and its licensees, successors, and assigns, the rights, title, and interest in and to the Work, throughout the world, for the full term of the copyright and
    [Show full text]
  • Writepublishread's How to Self-Publish for Everyone
    WritePublishRead’s How to Self-publish for Everyone Contents Welcome .............................................................................................................. iv The WritePublishRead process in a few words ....................................................... iv What is the WritePublishRead programme? .......................................................... vi How the WritePublishRead programme works ....................................................... vi How the WritePublishRead Assisted Self-Publishing programme works .................. 1 WritePublishRead Assisted Self-Publishing programme: rules and requirements ....2 About Smashwords ...............................................................................................3 More about Smashwords .......................................................................................5 Why is this an eBook programme and not a printed book one? ................................5 The WritePublishRead Process ..............................................................................8 Step 1 Write! Let’s get going! .................................................................................8 Before you write ....................................................................................................8 What’s your big idea? ............................................................................................9 Just write! ............................................................................................................11 Three
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts, Copyright & Confusion
    Contracts, Copyright & Confusion Making Sense of Your Book Publishing Contract Lisa Quinn, Acquisitions Editor Wilfrid Laurier University Press Contract Basics A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more persons for a particular purpose. For example: • a person offers to give another person something (contract of sale) • to provide a service (hire of services or lease of property) • to refrain from doing something (non-competition) • a mandate whereby a person gives another the power to represent them A contract is a mechanism of economic exchange. The primary exchange of the publishing contract concerns copyright. …the sole right to produce or reproduce the work or any substantial part thereof in any material form whatever, to perform the work or any substantial part thereof in public or, if the work is unpublished, to publish the work or any substantial part thereof… Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) 3. (1) The Copyright Clause: Examples Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the Author hereby grants to the Press, the sole and exclusive copyright to produce and publish the Work titled… The Author hereby grants and assigns to the Publisher and its international affiliates, subsidiaries and assignees worldwide, all rights, title and interest in and to the copyright in [her] book herein identified as the ‘Work,’ and the exclusive right to publish and license to publish the first and all subsequent editions in all forms and media in all languages throughout the world… Moral Rights V. Copyright The author of a work has the moral right to: • be named as the author of the work as they choose • the integrity of the work • Authors cannot assign their moral rights to someone else but they can waive them • Signing over copyright does not constitute waiving moral rights • If an author waives their moral rights to the copyright holder, that party can enforce those rights in place of the author • Moral rights subsist for the same term as the copyright in the work Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Technology Law Journal
    BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 25 NUMBER 3 SYMPOSIUM 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SYMPOSIUM: COPYRIGHT @ 300 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: HAPPY BIRTHDAY STATUTE OF ANNE: THE DANCE BETWEEN THE COURTS AND CONGRESS.. .............................. 1145 Hon. M. MargaretMcKeown THE COPYRIGHT PRINCIPLES PROJECT: DIRECTIONS FOR REFORM................... 1175 Pamela Samuelson and Members of The CPP THE UNTOLD STORY OF THE FIRST COPYRIGHT SUIT UNDER THE STATUTE OF ANNE IN 1710 ........................................... 1247 H. Tomds Gdme-Arostegui ALL CHANGE FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: COPYRIGHT AND BUSINESS MODELS IN THE EARLY EIGHTEENTH CENTURY....................... 1351 IsabellaAlexander THE INVENTION OF COMMON LAW PLAY RIGHT.......... ............... 1381 Jessica Litman THE ADVENTURES OF THE STATUTE OF ANNE IN THE LAND OF UNLIMITED POSSIBILITIES: THE LIFE OF A LEGAL TRANSPLANT ............ 1427 Oren Bracha "THE SOLE RIGHT... SHALL RETURN TO THE AUTHORS": ANGLO- AMERICAN AUTHORS' REVERSION RIGHTS FROM THE STATUTE OF ANNE TO CONTEMPORARY U.S. COPYRIGHT ....................... ........... 1475 Lionel Bently & Jane C Ginsburg SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION The Berkeley Technolog Law Journal (ISSN1086-3818), a continuation of the High Technolog Law journal effective Volume 11, is edited by the students of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall), and published four times each year (May, August, November, February) by the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. Journal Publications, School of Law. Periodicals Postage Rate Paid at Berkeley, CA 94704-9998, and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Journal Publications, 2850 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 561 #7220, Berkeley, CA 94705-7220. Correspondence. Address all correspondence regarding subscriptions, address changes, claims for non-receipt, single copies, advertising, and permission to reprint to Journal Publications, 2850 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 561 #7220 Berkeley, CA 94705-7220; (510) 643-6600; JournalPublications@ law.berkeley.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Factors Influencing Publishers' Ability to Sell Rights Or to Distribute Into a Foreign Region
    RIGHTS OR DISTRIBUTION: AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLISHERS' ABILITY TO SELL RIGHTS OR TO DISTRIBUTE INTO A FOREIGN REGION by Jennifer Powell B.A. (Honours), Trinity College, University of Dublin, 2003 PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PUBLISHING in the Faculty ofArts & Social Sciences © Jennifer Powell 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. Approval Name: Jennifer Powell Degree: Master ofPublishing Title ofProject: Rights or Distribution: An Analysis ofFactors Influencing Publishers' Ability to Sell Rights or to Distribute into a Foreign Region Supervisory Committee: John Maxwell Senior Supervisor Publishing Program Don Sedgwick Supervisor Publishing Program Stephanie Purcell Industry Supervisor Children's Rights Manager Simon & Schuster UK Ltd, London Date Approved: 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection (currently available to the public at the "Institutional Repository" link of the SFU Library website <www.lib.sfu.ca> at: <http://ir.lib.sfu.calhandle/18921112>) and, without changing the content, to translate the thesis/project or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition of Edward A. Miller
    1 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 4 RANDOM HOUSE, INC., ) 5 ) Plaintiff, ) 6 ) vs. ) 7 ) ROSETTA BOOKS, LLC and ) 8 ARTHUR M. KLEBANOFF, in his ) individual capacity and as ) 9 principal of ROSETTA BOOKS, ) LLC, ) 10 ) Defendants. ) 11 -----------------------------) 12 13 14 DEPOSITION OF EDWARD A. MILLER 15 New York, New York 16 Wednesday, March 28, 2001 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Reported by: JOAN WARNOCK 25 JOB NO. 119763B 2 1 2 3 March 28, 2001 4 1:45 p.m. 5 6 Deposition of EDWARD A. MILLER, held 7 at the offices of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, 8 LLP, 767 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, 9 pursuant to Notice, before Joan Warnock, a 10 Notary Public of the State of New York. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 2 A P P E A R A N C E S: 3 4 WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 767 Fifth Avenue 7 New York, New York 10153-0119 8 BY: R. BRUCE RICH, ESQ. 9 10 KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 One South Broad Street, Suite 2100 13 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-3389 14 BY: JOANNE ZACK, ESQ. 15 16 ALSO PRESENT: 17 ANKE E. STEINECKE 18 NATALIA PORCELLI 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, 3 by and between counsel for the respective 4 parties hereto, that the filing, sealing and 5 certification of the within deposition shall 6 be and the same are hereby waived; 7 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED 8 that all objections, except as to the form 9 of the question, shall be reserved to the 10 time of the trial; 11 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED 12 that the within deposition may be signed 13 before any Notary Public with the same force 14 and effect as if signed and sworn to before 15 the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Letter from and We Were the Last Ones Still Talking
    the pitch spring 2014 The Newsletter for the Association of Authors' Representatives CONTENTS LETTER FROM and we were the last ones still talking. I THE PRESIDENT felt as if I had had a primer on the last 1. LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT fifty years in this business. Michigan-born Carole always 3. THE RISE OF MASS MARKET e in the American agent thought she would follow her father 4. BIG MOVES: SPOTLIGHT ON Wcommunity have suffered way too many into law, then considered looking for EDITORS' NEW POSITIONS sad losses in the past couple of years. a position on Wall Street, and moved How we miss the genial temperament to New York City after college in the 5. LOIS WALLACE, AN ORIGINAL of Owen Laster, who seemed to know mid-1960s only to find that it appeared 6. NEW FINANCING POSSIBILITIES everyone else at the Four Seasons impossible for a young woman to find FOR THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS when we met for a group lunch there; a good job on Wall Street. To pay the 6. COMMITTEE REPORT: the gentlemanly warmth of Carl rent, she took a job as a copy editor at INTERNATIONAL Brandt; the droll seriousness of Robert Holt, Rinehart and Winston, and found 7. CONTRIBUTORS Lescher. I figure that Wendy Weil herself copyediting books such as “The and Lois Wallace, the best of friends Bluest Eye” by Toni Morrison. Staff 8. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IF in life, are avidly discussing books, changes left her head of the copyediting YOU'RE BUILDING A NEW AGENCY WEBSITE fashion, and the latest gossip in the department.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Book Contracts
    NATIONAL WRITERS UNION GUIDE TO BOOK CONTRACTS by Philip Mattera, NWU National Book Grievance Officer Maria Pallante, Former NWU Executive Director Revised by Christine Ammer <For NWU Members only> ©1995. All rights reserved. Revision © 2007 No part of this publication may be reproduced, displayed, performed, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, in whole or in part, including without limitation by electronic or mechanical means, without the prior permission of the National Writers Union. National Writers Union/UAW Local 1981 113 University Place, 6th floor, New York, NY 10003 (212) 254-0279; e-mail: [email protected] January 1995, November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Acknowledgments . 5 I. RIGHTS AND COPYRIGHT . 8 1. Copyright . 8 — Works Made for Hire . 8 2. Publishing rights . 11 a. Grant of rights--format . 11 b. Grant of rights--duration . 11 c. Grant of rights--geographical scope . 12 3. Subsidiary rights . 13 a. Granting vs. reserving rights . 13 b. Notification; reversion of rights . 14 c. Flowthrough/passthrough . 15 d. Income splits . 15 i. Paperback reprint rights . 16 ii. First serialization . 16 iii. Second serialization and anthology rights . 16 iv. Book club rights . 16 v. Translation & foreign English-language rights . 17 vi. Audio rights . 17 vii. Merchandising rights . 17 viii. Performance rights . 17 ix. Electronic rights . 18 x. Miscellaneous and unspecified rights . 20 II. ROYALTIES . 20 1. Method of calculation . 20 —Freight Pass-Through . 21 2. Advances . 22 a. Size of the advance . 22 b. Schedule of advance payments . 23 c. Bestseller clause . 24 3. Royalty rates . 24 a. Hardcover editions . 25 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Backlist Rights Clearance and Digitization Aaup 2012 Annual Meeting Handouts Kathleen Kornell, Univers
    TACKLING THE UNTHINKABLE: BACKLIST RIGHTS CLEARANCE AND DIGITIZATION AAUP 2012 ANNUAL MEETING HANDOUTS KATHLEEN KORNELL, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESS [email protected] CLAIRE LEWIS EVANS, UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PRESS [email protected] LAURA YOUNG BOST, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PRESS [email protected] December 9, 2011 Dear, This letter constitutes an addendum to the publishing agreement fully-executed on [insert date] with the University of Illinois Press to publish, [insert title]. We are pleased to inform you the University of Illinois Press is beginning to distribute our titles electronically. As we continue to expand our relationship with e- book vendors, including those with sales to libraries and to individual consumers, we wish to amend your publishing agreement to conform to our current e-book royalty rate. Though our current contract conveys e-book rights to us, it does not specify royalty terms for e-book sales. We are able to offer you the same terms for e-books as we offer for clothbound books, [insert royalty percentage] of the net amount we receive from selling your book as an e-book. Please acknowledge your agreement to this addendum by signing both copies of this letter, retaining one for your records, and returning the other to me. All other terms of the original agreement remain the same. We hope you are as enthusiastic about these new digital opportunities as we are and we look forward to advancing our relationship into the digital realm. Respectfully, Signature: Willis G. Regier Director THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESS Date: [email protected] BACKLIST CLEARANCE CHECKLIST (Illlinois) _____________ Checker’s Initials _____________________________________________________________________________________ Author & Book Title 1.
    [Show full text]