How Would Paul Engage Today's Secularizing Society?: an Exegetical Revisiting of Acts 17

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Would Paul Engage Today's Secularizing Society?: an Exegetical Revisiting of Acts 17 MSJ 30/1 (Spring 2019) 147–67 HOW WOULD PAUL ENGAGE TODAY’S SECULARIZING SOCIETY?: AN EXEGETICAL REVISITING OF ACTS 17 Chris Burnett Faculty Associate and Ph.D. Candidate, The Master’s Seminary Proponents across the spectrum of contextualization theory often appeal to Paul’s strategic evangelization through Macedonia into Athens in Acts 17 to either support or decry the theological presuppositions at the root of popular Christian dialogue theories. It is therefore opportune to exegetically revisit this locus classicus to understand the guiding parameters and practices of Paul, especially for mission- aries who daily combat the overwhelming forces of secularism and religious plural- ism. The exegetical analysis of Acts 17 provides crucial, unmistakable conclusions about Paul’s methods of interreligious dialogue and cultural engagement in the for- eign context. The theological and practical constraints of Christian dialogue which emerge from the study should embolden the missionary in the task of propositional evangelism––that is, proclaiming the distinctly Christian gospel to a religiously am- bivalent culture. * * * * * Global Dialogue and the Relevance of Scripture Missionaries to the Majority World work on the cutting edge of innovation and creativity to combat the overwhelming hostility to the lordship of Jesus Christ found in religious pluralism and in secularism.1 As frontline contextualizers, missionaries 1 Secularism, rising in part from the vast array of globalizing worldview options, promotes the athe- istic value of separating religious faith and human reason so that the input and influence in the growth of society and individuals comes from the well of human experience rather than from a transcendent, super- natural source. For general social theory proposals as to the effects of globalization on the secular mindset, see Brian S. Turner, Religion and Modern Society: Citizenship, Secularisation and the State (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011); David Martin, The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Vio- lence and Democracy, Religion and Secularization, (Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge, 2010). 147 148 | How Would Paul Engage daily wrestle with a debate that has endured nearly two millennia over the controlling authority for evangelistic engagement with differing sources of truth.2 At least two questions relate to the ever-present debate over Christian dialogue method in the secularizing world: If secularism drains the religious and spiritual char- acter of a culture, then how should the missionary attempt to make theological in- roads? Is searching for spiritual commonalities in a foreign secular context a strategy that the apostles would condone? Scripture presents straightforward guidelines for combatting the complexities of the ever-increasing secularization of newly globalizing societies across the world. Broad biblical and theological parameters for evangelistic contextualization emerge in the canon of Scripture through a wide range of strategic approaches and case stud- ies.3 Perhaps no missionary has met the challenges of contextualization from the ba- sis of Scripture more directly and more consistently than the apostle Paul throughout his foreign travels. Proponents across the spectrum of contextualization theory often appeal to Paul’s strategic evangelization through Macedonia into Athens in Acts 17 2 Tertullian (ca. 155–ca. 240 AD) warned of the contaminating influence of Hellenistic philosophy on the tenets of Christianity, asserting that enmeshing conflicting founts of knowledge ultimately risks the syncretizing of Christian and pagan worldviews into a “mottled Christianity.” He famously asked, “What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the Academy and the Church?” Tertullian, “Prescription against Heretics,” in Greek and Roman Philosophy After Aristotle, trans. Jason L. Saunders (Simon & Schuster, 1966), 344. More recently, Miroslav Volf’s proposal for greater recon- ciliation concerning Christian-Muslim relations highlights how interfaith dialogue might lead to theolog- ical pluralism (See Miroslav Volf, Allah: A Christian Response [San Francisco: HarperOne, 2011]; see critique by Collin Hansen, “Do Muslims and Christians Worship the Same God?,” online editorial [June 28, 2011], accessed March 22, 2018, http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/do-muslims-and-chris- tians-worship-the-same-god; also see analysis in Gerald R. McDermott and Harold A. Netland, A Trini- tarian Theology of Religions: An Evangelical Proposal (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014), 62– 65. Contrast with Jason Medearis’s unqualified support of Volf’s methodology (in comments to Georges Houssney, “Analysis of Paul’s Acts 17,” article [April 4, 2011], accessed March 22, 2018, www.bibli- calmissiology.org/2011/04/04/analysis-of-pauls-acts-17/). 3 In the Old Testament one need only look to Abraham, for example, to see how the message of grace-enabled, justifying faith in Yahweh extends from one culture-bound family to all peoples of the earth (Gen. 12:2–3; 15:5–6; 22:17–18). The message of salvation is necessarily transcultural and contex- tual. Peters broadly identifies the “universality” of the OT missionary mandate in George W. Peters, A Biblical Theology of Missions (Chicago: Moody, 1972), 21–25. The OT saint is the one who, regardless of culture, repented of sin and sought the one true God (Isa. 55:6–7) as revealed to Abraham’s offspring Israel, Yahweh’s holy nation (Exod. 19:6). Because of the atoning sacrifice of Israel’s Messiah for sinners (Isa. 53:4–11; cf. Mark 10:45), salvation reaches beyond the borders of Israel into many nations through the work of missionaries presently and in the millennium (Isa. 52:7, 15; cf. Rom. 10:15). Of interest for further study on biblical contextualization approaches are the NT intercultural exchanges of Jesus with the Greeks (John 12:20–50), with the Syrophoenecian woman (Matt. 15:21–28), and with Samaritans (John 4:4–43); Philip’s intercultural exchange with the Ethiopian (Acts 8:25–39); Peter’s exchange with Cor- nelius the Italian God-fearer (Acts 10:1–11:18), the contextualization guidelines established by the Jeru- salem Council (Acts 15:1–21), his evangelization at Pentecost (Acts 2:1–47), the implications of his cul- tural hypocrisy in Antioch (Gal. 2:11–21), and his contribution to the doctrines of bibliology which inform contextualization (1 Pet. 1:24–2:3; 2 Pet. 1:16–21); John’s intercultural exchange among the mixed con- gregations of Asia Minor (1–3 John) who were later addressed directly by Jesus Christ (Rev. 2:1–3:22); Paul’s understanding of the spiritual limitations to a culturally rooted gospel comprehension (1 Cor. 1:17– 2:16), and the cultural motivations for messianic believers to perform non-salvific Temple vows and sac- rifices (Acts 21:15–29). The Master’s Seminary Journal | 149 to either support or decry the theological presuppositions found at the root of popular Christian dialogue theories. This article revisits the apostle Paul’s evangelistic activities in Acts 17 with a fresh exegetical analysis in order to provide essential insights for developing an evan- gelical dialogue method suitable to a secularizing society. Analyzing the original text with a straightforward hermeneutic provides crucial, unmistakable conclusions about Paul’s methods of interreligious dialogue and cultural engagement in the foreign con- text. The theological and practical constraints of Christian dialogue which emerge from the study should embolden the missionary in the task of proclaiming the dis- tinctly Christian gospel to a religiously ambivalent culture. But first it is opportune to present some of the key theological presuppositions which undergird the work of the conservative contextualizer who aims to follow the path of Paul in the activity of dialogue. Presuppositions and Definitions Conservative evangelicals need to speak with biblical clarity when they deter- mine to engage growing societal paradigms such as secularization. The task of con- structing a biblically faithful contextualization model in a secularizing society must operate from a high view of Scripture, one which both allows and expects the text to set the priorities and boundaries of the missionary task.4 Contextualization is there- fore necessarily and fundamentally an exegetically harnessed and doctrinally bound work. Thus, the Christian who appeals to the sufficiency of Scripture in missionary endeavors must ascertain the biblical parameters for responding to false theological claims and do so in a relevant way that avoids inappropriately hybridizing true and false beliefs at every level.5 Likewise, the conservative missionary must retain a low view of man, not in terms of one’s affection or esteem for the target audience but with regard to the spir- itual reality upon which to build the gospel message. It must be remembered that nonbelievers from the most diverse contexts and belief systems do not hold entirely distinct or isolated worldviews,6 because at the base of each lies the objective fact 4 In comparison with the this-worldly tolerance of many or no faiths today, a high view of Scripture is exceedingly high. The Bible holds the ultimate authority for defining truth; it demands absolute belief in the reality it proclaims and punishes all disbelief and disobedience with an eternal judgment proclaimed by God Himself. Such a high view of Scripture therefore has the highest desire––the transformation of individual children of wrath into children
Recommended publications
  • The Tuesday Afternoon Bible Study - Acts 17 Continuing Paul’S 2Nd Missionary Journey
    The Tuesday Afternoon Bible Study - Acts 17 Continuing Paul’s 2nd Missionary Journey Here’s the handy map: https://kimberlinglutheran.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Lesson-17-Pauls-second-missionary-journey1.jpg At the end of chapter 16, Paul, Silas, Timothy, and now Luke leave Philippi and head south along the Aegean Sea towards Thessalonica, another major city in Greece. It’s been noted that very rarely in Acts do people travel to hear the gospel – in Acts, the gospel comes to them, brought by messengers. This shows God’s willingness to meet us where we are – the good news is meant to crash in on people’s lives, wherever we find ourselves. God’s Good News comes to people everywhere. Read Acts 17: 1-9, in Thessalonica 1. Note that Paul spends 3 weeks speaking on why Jesus was the Messiah who came “to suffer and to rise from the dead.” 2. Some of the Jews are persuaded, but also a great many God-fearing Greeks, including “leading women.” Why do you think it is significant that Paul specifically points out the women? 3. Yet, a mob ensues, and while searching for Paul, they drag Jason and others to court. Note how the disciples are described as “those people who have been turning the world upside down.” Do you think this is positive or negative? I’ve always taken it as positive thing, but I don’t think they meant it that way! 4. Jason is a Greek name. Tradition counts Jason as one of the 70 disciples sent out by Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unknown God: Connecting with the Culture (Acts
    Action An Unknown God | CONNECTING WITH THE CULTURE What Do I Need to Know About the Passage? What’s the Big Idea? Acts 17:16-34 In this passage, Paul shares the gospel with a group of pluralistic philosophers, whose This passage is one of the most relevant in all of Acts. Here, Luke gives us a record worldview was very similar to that of college of Paul’s interaction with a group of philosophers in Athens. His tact and skill at students today. His message is a study in communicating the gospel to this group of pluralists is fantastic. There is much here how to tactfully, and effectively, create a that we can model on campus. thirst among unbelieving people to hear the gospel. In verse 16, Paul is waiting in Athens for his travel companions, Silas and Timothy. He was sent ahead alone because of the risk of violence from an unruly mob in the cities in which he had been. Although he is supposed to wait for them, Paul isn’t one for inactivity. He sees that the city is full of idols, and is greatly distressed and moved to action. God alone is great. Mute idols of stone, gold, or silver ought not steal praise from God. So, Paul begins to preach, both in the synagogue and in the marketplace. Some of the philosophers debate with him and invite him to come address the Areopagus, a society of philosophers. Luke, in this account, derides those philosophers What’s the Problem? for doing nothing but sitting around talking about the latest ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts Part 15 Gospel Contextualization Acts 17:1-34 Acts
    Acts part 15 Gospel Contextualization Acts 17:1-34 Acts 17:1–4[1] Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. [2] And Paul went in, as was his custom, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, [3] explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.” [4] And some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women. Paul in Thessalonica. When Paul is talking to jews, he reasons from the scriptures. Looking at OT passages and why the messiah was not a political/military leader but a suffering servant. ​ Psalm 22 Isaiah 53 Verse 10-15 He gets run out of the city, he next went to Berea (90 miles) and preached there and ​ ​ ​ ​ many believed him. People in Thessalonica found out that Paul was preaching in Berea and they came ​ ​ and ran him out as well. “These men that are turning the world upside down have come here” ​ Paul fled and went to Athens, and here is where our story begins. Home of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the great. It was a university town and ​ ​ Paul was the first Christian to arrive in that town. Acts 17:16–34 [16] Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts of the Apostles Session 5 Acts 10-12
    Acts of the Apostles Session 5 Acts 10-12 “…to the ends of the earth!” Humility (and humiliations!) for the Gospel Recap and look forward • May 27- Acts 13-16 • June 3- Acts 17-20 • June 10- Acts 21-24 • June 17- Acts 24-28 • June 24- Acts 29 Outline for our discussion: • 10:1-33 -the visions of Peter and Cornelius and their meeting • 10:34-43 Peter’s preaching of Jesus Christ • 10:44-49 Coming of the Holy Spirit (!) and Baptism • 11- Peter explains his actions to the Jerusalem Christians • 11:19-26 Church in Antioch, “Christians”, Barnabas and Saul • 11:27-30 prophecy of Agabus and mercy missions • 12: 1-19 Herod’s persecution of the Church, Martyrdom of James, son of Zebedee, arrest of Peter and Peter’s miraculous release from prison • 12:20-25 Death of Herod (Julius Agrippa I) Quiz Time! (answers given at the end of the session) 1. What was the controversy that led the early Church to call and ordain the first deacons? 2. What is the method of reading the Old Testament called where you see Old Testament figures as being fulfilled in Jesus? (used by Stephen in his preaching before his martyrdom) 3. Name two ways that Deacon Philip’s engagement with the Ethiopian eunuch are a model for evangelization. 4. Name one place that the famous “Son of Man” from Daniel chapter 7 is referenced in the Gospel of Luke or Acts of the Apostles. ***Cindy and the “standing” of the Son of Man at the right Hand of God in Stephen’s vision* Humility and humiliations: Saul escaping Damascus in a basket (9:23-25); Peter eating gross stuff, visiting house of a Roman Centurion; a Roman Centurion prostrating before a Jewish fisherman; baptizing pagans; Peter explaining himself before others (newcomers to the Jesus movement!); Herod’s self-exaltation and demise; hilarious liberation of Peter from prison; handing over leadership to James.
    [Show full text]
  • By the Spirit, Christ Is Ever Near—Acts 17:16-31; John 14:15-21 Page 1 Easter 6A Pastor Douglas Punke
    By the Spirit, Christ Is Ever Near—Acts 17:16-31; John 14:15-21 Page 1 Easter 6a Pastor Douglas Punke In the name of c Jesus. We didn’t get to celebrate the Easter Feast, but the season is not over. We continue to ponder Jesus’ resurrection. But this far into season we have moved beyond Jesus’ resurrection appearances to the Church’s proclamation of that resurrection. In our first reading, we find Paul in Athens, the city with those beautiful structures dedicated to their mythical gods and goddesses. The most famous structure is probably the Parthenon, dedicated to Athen’s patron goddess Athena. Paul’s “spirit was provoked within him” by this “city … full of idols.” He began to reason with the Jews and others in the synagogue and in the marketplace, with anyone who would listen. Paul preached “Jesus and the resurrection.” He caught their interest. Even “the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers” wanted to hear more. They took Paul to the Areopagus. Perhaps that means to the rock hill where supposedly Ares, the Greek god of war, had “been tried … by the gods for the murder of Poseidon’s son.” Blah, blah, blah. It’s sometimes referred to as “Mars Hill” because the Roman god of war was Mars. But more probably this means that Paul was brought before the Council of the Areopagus because of its “special jurisdiction in matters of morals and religion” (Illustrated Bible Dictionary, 1:108). Regardless, Paul presented his case for the true God, not idols made of “gold or silver or stone.” He made His case for the Creator and Preserver of all things, not something imagined by the mind of man and fashioned by his hands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Pentecost Meditations on God’S Mission in Acts
    Week 5 The Power of Pentecost Meditations on God’s Mission in Acts OLCC’s mission leads us to be people who worship God, are formed to be like Christ, and are empowered by the Spirit to be on mission with Jesus. In this space between Easter and Pentecost (May 31), we want to focus together on seeing God’s unstoppable mission outlined in the book of Acts. We’ll be looking at a passage or chapter from it each day. As you soak in these passages, you can use the following format that builds in the practices of prayerful reading, inviting God to speak, and praying scripture: 1. Read. Invite the Holy Spirit’s presence as you read the passage to orient yourself. ​ 2. Ask. Ask God to open the passage to you, and read it again. ​ ​ ​ 3. Pray. Use the words of the passage to pray it back to Jesus and the Father. ​ 4. Listen. Pause and listen, and note what you sense God communicating to you. ​ Throughout our journey to Pentecost, we’ll see how the Father’s promise of the Holy Spirit was fulfilled, how the early church was established and continued the ministry of Jesus, and how God worked through these ordinary people to expand his kingdom. — Connie Willems ​ ​ Day 25 Acts 17:16-34 – Paul tells the good news in Athens. 1. Read. Invite the Holy Spirit’s presence as you read the passage to orient yourself. ​ 2. Ask. “Father, what would you like me to see about telling your gospel?” Read the passage ​ ​ ​ again.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul's Second Missionary Journey Acts 17:1-15 Paul and Barnabas
    Paul's Second Missionary Journey Acts 17:1-15 Paul and Barnabas parted company because of a disagreement they had about John Mark. The young man had earlier left their company and returned to Jerusalem. Barnabas wanted to give John Mark, his nephew, another chance, but Paul preferred not to take him on the next trip. So Barnabas and John Mark went one way, and Paul chose Silas to accompany him on a trip in another direction. Besides Paul and Silas there were two more preachers on the journey; a young Christian named Timothy and Luke, the physician. They arrived in Thessalonica (thes uh luh NIKE uh) which was a seaport town. Paul preached in the Jewish synagogue for three Sabbaths. Many Jews and Greeks believed his teaching, but his enemies, the Jews who didn't believe, began stirring up trouble again, and Paul and Silas had to leave the city at night under the cover of darkness. They went to Berea (buh REE uh). The people there listened to Paul, but they also searched the scriptures to be sure what Paul was saying agreed with the scriptures they accepted as the word of God. Of course, the teachings were in perfect harmony because God, who had inspired the scriptures, was also guiding Paul's preaching. The Bible says the Bereans were more noble than the people in Thessalonica because they wanted to prove that Paul's words were true. The Jews in Thessalonica came to Berea and started causing trouble for Paul, so the Christians sent him to Athens, but Silas and Timothy stayed in Berea intending to join Paul as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • SSS 2019 Acts Handouts
    !1 MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? The Word of God and Evangelisation Today Holy Cross College 2019 Kieran J. O’Mahony www.tarsus.ie The First Christian History: the Acts of the Apostles Learning today from the very first generations Programme 1. Introduction to the Acts (p. 1) 2. Pentecost tableau (p. 8) 3. Speeches in Acts (p. 14) 4. Conversion of Cornelius (p. 18) 5. Paul in Athens (p. 23) 6. Paul in Rome (p. 28) 1. Introduction to the Acts • First of all • Two “big” stories • Getting started • History? • Date, authorship, location • Prayer / Conversation First of all… • The world of Acts • Our world(s)!!! • This is a rattling good story, full of excitement and drama. • Plenty of friendship • Plenty of conflict • Two “big” stories with lots of little stories around as well… • Two “big” stories: Peter and Paul • Two volumes: Gospel and Acts together • Starts in Jerusalem and ends in Rome. • Really the story of Peter and then Paul; Peter peters out. • Large biblical theology of history, found chiefly in the speeches. • About one third of Acts is made up of speeches. • The break with Judaism and the inclusion of the Gentiles. • The “we” passages in Acts. • The vast number of characters. • Certain scenes receive extensive treatment (Cornelius; the journey to Rome). • Ends happily, but strangely without closure. Two “big” stories Two volumes: Gospel and Acts together Preface Luke 1:1-4 Part I Luke 1:5-2:52 The time of Israel reaches its climax Part II Luke 3:1-Acts 1:26 The time of Jesus Part III Acts 2:1-28:31 The time of the Church www.tarsus.ie !2
    [Show full text]
  • Acts 17:1-15 (#27) 10.8.20 (20087) the Effective Gospel
    Acts 17:1-15 (#27) 10.8.20 (20087) The Effective Gospel I. Acts 26:15-18. Paul’s call is the Church’s call as well. (Matt.28:18-20) A. Their world was adversarial, multi-cultural, multi-religious, and innately opposed to the gospel. An evil age (Gal.1:4) B. Yet the Lord was at work opening eyes, bring people from darkness to light, from the power of Satan to God, receiving forgiveness and sanctification by believing in Jesus Christ. II. Paul’s second journey is an illustration of this. Acts 17:1-15. (after the stress in Philippi) A. Thessalonica. 1-9 (100 miles from Philippi, capitol of Macedonia, 45-65k population) 1. He starts with a knowledgeable audience. The Jews who already had God’s Word. The Synagogue in Thessalonica. 2-4. a) Israel was and is God’s people in a unique way. b) To the Jew first, and also to the Greek. (Rom.1:16-17) 2. He brings them Shocking Message. 3. The Gospel. Explaining about who Jesus is and what he did. Lk.24:44-47 a) Jesus is the Christ, the risen Lord. (1) Lordship. Jesus was presented as Lord. King Jesus. v. 7 b) Who died for our sins. (suffered) (1) Atonement (his death) and resurrection (which includes the ascension), which demonstrates his saving lordship. c) So that by faith in him, we might be forgiven and brought into the Lord’s own life. d) Reasoning = argue, debate, reason together (1) From the Scriptures (2) Over time. 3 weeks e) Explaining = Teaching, and answering questions and giving a meaningful f) Proving = Giving evidence (NASB).
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of the Kingdom in Acts 3:19–21
    MSJ 26/1 (Spring 2015) 75–93 IMPLICATIONS OF THE KINGDOM IN ACTS 3:19–21 Peter Goeman Ph.D. Candidate The Master’s Seminary The Messianic Kingdom is a subject which is given great importance in Scrip- ture. Different theological systems debate the current status of this kingdom and its relationship to Israel. A neglected passage in this discussion is Acts 3:19–21. In or- der for a theological system to be accurate, it must incorporate Acts 3:19–21. This passage teaches that the Messiah’s kingdom is not present at this time, and awaits the future repentance of the nation of Israel, at which time Israel will turn to the Messiah and He will return to establish the kingdom. ***** Introduction Acts 3:19–21 appears to teach that the end time events of the Messiah’s Second Coming and the establishment of His kingdom are in some way related to the national repentance and forgiveness of Israel. In addition, the context of Acts 3:19–21 seems to indicate that the promised kingdom will not come until that time. This understand- ing of Acts 3:19–21 also appears to match the expectations of both the Old Testament and non-canonical Jewish literature. This article will begin by addressing Acts 3:19–21, examining its meaning in context. Then, the proposed interpretation of Acts 3:19–21 will be compared with the teaching of the Old Testament, as well as the common Jewish expectation of Peter’s day. Finally, this article will offer a reason for Luke’s authorial strategy in placing Acts 3:19–21 within the broad flow of Luke-Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPREAD of the Gospel in the BOOK of ACTS WELCOME to FELLOWSHIP PRAYER REQUESTS PRAYER TEAM
    WITNESSES THE SPREAD OF THE gospel IN THE BOOK OF ACTS WELCOME TO FELLOWSHIP PRAYER REQUESTS PRAYER TEAM WITNESSES THE SPREAD OF THE gospel IN THE BOOK OF ACTS Questions for WITNESSES Why do we come to church (if you do)? Regular attender or regular misser? How is the truth communicated best? Are you readyActs to receive 17 and evaluate? In the second century BC, the Romans built a highway called the via Egnatia from Dyrrachium on the Adriatic Sea to Byzantium (now called Constantinople) near the Black Sea, a distance of almost 700 miles. Nearly 20 feet wide and paid with hand laid stone slabs, it carried Roman troops to battle, and merchandise everywhere. Chuck Swindoll PAUL’S SECOND MISSIONARY JOURNEY c. AD 49 – 52 (Ac 15:3 9 –18:22) THRACE Black Sea A C E D O N N D P O N T US M I A A Philippi Byzantium I A Amphipolis Neapolis N Thessalonica Y Samothrace Nicaea H A Berea Apollonia T t I I A Gulf on I sp Prusa B C lle T He O A Troas A Dorylaeum D e MYSIA g e L A a Thyatira A n I P A A C H A I G Pisidian P A S ASIA e G a Y Antioch A Athens Ephesus . Corinth R C s Iconium t H Cilician M Saronic Lystra Cenchreae P Gates Derbe I A s Gulf Sila u C nd s l a I Pau n L Tarsus a I m C Seleucia A Rhodes Pieria Antioch S Y as ab R CRETE S arn k U B ar .
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Inspiring Lessons from the Life (And Death) of Dorcas Heather Adams | Contributing Writer 2021 24 May
    5 Inspiring Lessons from the Life (and Death) of Dorcas Heather Adams | Contributing Writer 2021 24 May Photo credit: ©Getty Images/Ridofranz “In Joppa there was a disciple named Tabitha (in Greek her name is Dorcas)...” (Acts 9:36a). Dorcas is mentioned only briefly, in the New Testament book of Acts. Yet she has been the subject of poems, paintings and even stained-glass art pieces. In the Catholic faith, feasts have been observed in her honor, along with other women who were very active in ministry for the early church. Why is there so much admiration for someone who only appears once in Scripture? Part of the reason can actually be found in the reaction of those that knew her, as they saw her illness and death. The story of this Godly woman offers insights for Christians who want to make a real difference in their communities. Who Was Dorcas? Dorcas, or Tabitha, lived in Joppa, an important port city overlooking the Mediterranean sea. She kept busy there as a seamstress, and her days were filled with activities that brought relief to the needy, especially widows. The fact that so many gathered to mourn her hints at how well-known and respected she must have been. And it was the widows’ affection for her that led them to seek the Apostle Peter’s help. He may have responded to their pleas in part because he had heard of her important work for the Lord in that area. The account of Dorcas is found in Acts 9:36-42. It occurred when Peter was staying in Lydda as he travelled around the region encouraging “the Lord’s people” (Acts 9:32).
    [Show full text]