Darkness,The Greatest Rabbi in the West,Louis Jacobs,Hard-Hearted

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Darkness,The Greatest Rabbi in the West,Louis Jacobs,Hard-Hearted The Lost Ark by: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen So many people love conspiracy theories, fantasies, and lost causes. Best- selling books and movies focus on myths of missing people, cities, and treasures such as Atlantis, Treasure Island. And going further back in time, to the Golden Fleece or the Ten Lost Tribes. Christianity of course is the champion of fantasies and relics. For centuries they searched for the Holy Cross. Enough pieces of wood were found to launch a whole armada. Or the nails used in the Crucifixion, to build a battleship. The Holy Grail has retained its grip on the imagination. Of course, we have ours too. The Menorah from the Second Temple that can be seen in Titus’s arch, was carried off to Rome. Some are still convinced it is hidden in the Vatican vaults despite the number of times Rome was ransacked. Anything of value was shipped off or melted down. But pride of place in the realms of myth goes to the ‘lost’ Holy Ark of the Covenant. Of which we read from the Torah this month. Forgetting Hollywood’s obsession, its disappearance has fascinated people for thousands of years. The details of the Ark’s construction can be found in several chapters in the Book of Exodus, starting with Chapter 25. God commands Moses to “make an Ark of acacia wood, two and a half cubits long, a cubit and a half wide, and a cubit and a half high. Overlay it with pure gold inside and out, make a gold molding roundabout. ….And deposit in it the tablets of the Covenant which I will give you. You shall make a cover of pure gold, two and a half cubits long and a cubit and a half wide.” On top there were .. “two cherubim of beaten gold facing each other from opposite ends.” The Ark disappeared at some point during the First Temple era, which ended in 586 BCE with the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem by the Babylonians. The Temple was sacked on several occasions even earlier. In 926 BCE, King Shishak of Egypt took the treasuries of the Temple and the royal house of Rehoboam (I Kings 14:25-26). In 786 BCE, King Jehoash of Israel attacked his former ally, King Amaziah of Judah. He seized the gold and silver from the Temple and the royal house and took that booty back to Samaria (II Kings 14:13-14). There is no mention of the Ark in the list of spoils taken from the Temple by the Chaldeans to Babylonia ( II Kings 25:13-17; Jeremiah 52:17-23). In none of these cases does the Bible say that the Ark was taken. And even if it had been it would make no sense to cart off the solid wooden structure. Anything made of gold would have been melted down for easier transport. Had the Ark still been in its usual place when the Babylonians conquered the Temple Mount, they surely would have seized this most valuable and holy possession. But the myth of the missing Ark continued. II Maccabees claims that Jeremiah hid the Ark in a cave on Mount Nebo, Moses’ final resting place. The precise location of which is unknown. The Talmud (Yoma 53b) contains lots of theories. Rabbi Judah said that the Ark was hidden in a subterranean chamber beneath the Holy of Holies by King Josiah. And several priests died when they accidentally discovering the exact spot and flames shot out and consumed them. Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Simeon bar Yochai said that the Ark was taken to Babylonia at the time of Jechoniah’s capture and exile (608 BCE). You might get confused over who Jechoniah was if you read the Bible because he was also known as Conia and Jehoakin. And incidentally, according to II Kings 25:27, thirty-seven years after the exile, he was released from prison by King Evil Merodach , welcomed to court, and made the official leader of the Judean community in Babylon The Talmud also quotes Josiah’s instructions to the Levites when he restored the Temple after the idolatrous reigns of Manasseh and Amon, to return the Ark to the Holy of Holies. (II Chronicles 35:3). But there is no evidence that he did, possibly probably because it no longer existed. While other Temple vessels were replaced when necessary, both in the first and the second Temples, the Ark is never mentioned again. Some people have suggested that this was because while winged Cherubim in the context of Mesopotamian religions represented a higher, heavenly presence, by the second Temple, the authorities feared that the cherubs might be mistaken for idols. And anyway, the Stone Tablets of the Covenant were no longer to found, so that its symbolism was lost forever. Although even earlier, according to the Bible, King Hezekiah had destroyed the Bronze Serpent on a Staff mentioned in the Torah and the Books of Magical Cures, because simple people were worshipping them in idolatrous fashion. According to the Talmud (Yoma 52b), there was no Ark in the Second Temple which was destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE. But even if there had been or it was buried under the temple foundations, after the Second Destruction in70 CE the Romans razed the Temple Mount to its foundations and there is no ark on the Arch of Titus. Either way, the original Ark disappeared and was never seen again. And there is not an ounce of logic to suggest that it was spirited away to darkest Africa or the Andes. Why therefore on earth would one think it must still exist? Still, fantasies sell, both religions and entertainment. Myths often have very important messages. So, what possibly could be the message of stories of the Lost Ark? To start with, from the Babylonian exile there was always a dream that eventually the House of David would return and rebuild Jerusalem and The Temple. It was revived with the Second Destruction as a powerful story of hope for the exiles. To this day rebuilding the Temple remains a powerful dream for many. All the more so, since Christianity claimed that the Temple and sacrifices were now redundant and symbols of an Old Covenant that had been replaced by a New One. The “stubborn Jews” were not going to give up their ideas until a Messiah came who really would bring peace on Earth. For me, the Ark is a symbol of how religions develop over time and are modified both by internal and external forces. But it also illustrates how whatever mistakes or disasters we inflict upon ourselves, there is always a future to look forward to. Looking back is only helpful if it enables us to go forward. The idea of sacrifices or even a rebuilt Temple does not excite me. But hope is a powerful and therapeutic emotion. And to think that we are the heirs to a tradition that goes back so many thousands of years and once included little cherubs on an Ark is a powerful incentive for wanting to see that tradition flourish and survive. Purim or Poor them. by: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen Purim is the happiest and craziest day in the Jewish calendar and the only festival that celebrates an event in the Diaspora. But is it really? According to tradition, the story of Purim and the Book of Esther date to the early Persian period somewhere in the 5th century BCE. The story is of a naïve, drunken, male chauvinist, incompetent Persian king. He rules over an empire that extended from India to Africa but has no control over his wife. He relies on a series of different advisors who can twist him around their fingers. And issues pathetic Royal decrees insisting that all wives should obey their husbands and only speak their native tongue. Ahasuerus, otherwise known as Achashverosh, is gulled by a wicked Haman into agreeing to kill all the Jews of the Persian Empire. But the evil plan is thwarted by the combined stratagems of Queen Esther (who hides her Jewish ancestry) and her uncle Mordechai. It is in fact the first example of anti-Semitism. Hating and wanting to destroy Jews for absolutely no logical reason other than that they are different and have different ways of life. The bad guy of the story, Haman, is called the Agagite. And Agag was an Amalekite king mentioned in the Bible. The author obviously wanted to make a connection with the first attack by the Amalekites on the Israelites, vulnerable as they left Egypt. The Amalekites were not being threatened so that the attack on the exhausted stragglers was particularly despicable. The Torah commanded the Israelites to never forget their enemies. Did the story of Esther and Mordechai ever take place? Some have argued that this is all about the rivalry of the Babylonian gods Marduk and Ishtar, as mentioned in the Gilgamesh Epic. Of course, names do not necessarily date anything. No more than someone called Mary in the USA today has any connection with the Virgin Mary of Christianity. The story raises all kinds of questions. The fact is that the first Persian king, Cyrus (600-530 BCE) decreed that all religions should be tolerated and respected throughout his empire. His declaration, the Cyrus Stele, can be seen today in the British Museum. Although succeeding kings varied in the degree of their support of Jewish communities both in Babylon and Judea, there is no evidence of a Persian king wanting to exterminate the Jews. Being different was never a problem so long as you accepted the political authority.
Recommended publications
  • The Numbered Sequence As a Literary Device in the Babylonian Talmud
    THE NUMBERED SEQUENCE AS A LITERARY DEVICE IN THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD by LOUIS JACOBS Leo Baeck College London, England Robert Gordis ( 1971, pp. 95-103) has demonstrated the use of the hep­ tad as a literary device by the Biblical and Rabbinic authors. He avoids the risks in this kind of exercise by adducing evidence to show that these au­ thors really had the numbered sequence in mind when they composed their works. Without supplementary evidence it would be precarious in the extreme to conclude that the occurrence of a given number of instances in a literary unit is anything but coincidental. In any given case the number of exam­ ples listed, be it three, seven, or ten, may happen to be the actual number involved, and not a matter of literary style. U. Cassuto ( 1959) has brilliantly suggested, for instance, that sequences of seven can be detected in the Pentateuchal narratives. He is often correct in seeing this pattern as a conscious striving for a literary usage based on this number. Yet in some instances, at least, coincidence cannot be ruled out. In general, there is little difficulty in discovering seven words or ideas recurring in any literary work. It is an amusing exercise to discover the number .. seven" in Cassuto's own writings. If one should be on guard against finding the number seven when it is not really present, it is all the more necessary when the search is for a smaller number like three. The author may have adopted this number .. un­ consciously," because of the natural tendency of the human mind to think of things in threes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Scholarly Writings of Rabbi Dr. Louis Jacobs (1920-2006)
    A bibliography of the scholarly writings of Rabbi Dr. Louis Jacobs (1920-2006) Compiled by Michael Fischer, Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies 1 You may download, use and distribute this bibliography free of charge for non-commercial purposes. However, the compilation remains the intellectual property of the author. No part of it may be changed or altered without prior written consent. Additions, corrections and comments are very welcome and will be incorporated into the printed version, due to be published in Summer 2008. Please write to [email protected]. © Michael Fischer, 2007 2 Acknowledgements Thanks are due mainly to Louis and Ivor Jacobs. It was very fortunate for my work that Louis Jacobs had tried to retain a reference copy of every one of his books and articles. He kindly gave me access to this collection and very happily answered all arising questions. After his death, his son Ivor Jacobs showed the same enthusiasm for my project and supported me by letting me file through the remaining publications and then posting several boxes of material to the Oxford Centre. I am also very grateful for the help of Stephen Slater of Jerusalem, who checked those journal issues for me that were not available anywhere in the UK. 3 Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................5 Scope of the bibliography ..............................................................................5 Citation style, arrangement, cross-referencing, transliteration
    [Show full text]
  • What Sugyot Should an Educated Jew Know?
    What Sugyot Should An Educated Jew Know? Jon A. Levisohn Updated: May, 2009 What are the Talmudic sugyot (topics or discussions) that every educated Jew ought to know, the most famous or significant Talmudic discussions? Beginning in the fall of 2008, about 25 responses to this question were collected: some formal Top Ten lists, many informal nominations, and some recommendations for further reading. Setting aside the recommendations for further reading, 82 sugyot were mentioned, with (only!) 16 of them duplicates, leaving 66 distinct nominated sugyot. This is hardly a Top Ten list; while twelve sugyot received multiple nominations, the methodology does not generate any confidence in a differentiation between these and the others. And the criteria clearly range widely, with the result that the nominees include both aggadic and halakhic sugyot, and sugyot chosen for their theological and ideological significance, their contemporary practical significance, or their centrality in discussions among commentators. Or in some cases, perhaps simply their idiosyncrasy. Presumably because of the way the question was framed, they are all sugyot in the Babylonian Talmud (although one response did point to texts in Sefer ha-Aggadah). Furthermore, the framing of the question tended to generate sugyot in the sense of specific texts, rather than sugyot in the sense of centrally important rabbinic concepts; in cases of the latter, the cited text is sometimes the locus classicus but sometimes just one of many. Consider, for example, mitzvot aseh she-ha-zeman gerama (time-bound positive mitzvoth, no. 38). The resulting list is quite obviously the product of a committee, via a process of addition without subtraction or prioritization.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Jacobs By: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen
    Louis Jacobs by: Rabbi Jeremy Rosen Any Anglo Jew from the 1960s will be familiar with the “Jacobs Affair” that divided the Jewish community more than any other religious debate in its history. There were other conflicts, between Sephardi and Ashkenazi, Reform and Traditional. But none as bitter or as lasting as this. I was a teenager when it all began, but it had a profound effect on how I viewed the Jewish religious establishment. Rabbi Louis (Laibel) Jacobs (1920-2006) studied in Yeshivot in Manchester and Gateshead and embarked on a career in the English rabbinate. He moved from the Central Synagogue in Manchester to the prestigious New West End Synagogue in Bayswater, London. It was part of the powerful Anglo Jewish establishment, the United Synagogue, that was under the authority of the Chief Rabbi and his Court, the Beth Din. He was one of the most impressive scholars and thinkers of his time. In an early book We Have Reason to Believe in 1957, he pointed out that there were different ways of understanding the concept of Divine Revelation, Torah Min Hashamayim. His sources were traditional and nothing he said was really controversial and the book had been positively reviewed even by religious journals. Most United Synagogue rabbis at the time saw no problem with what he wrote. He resigned from The New West End In 1960 to become a tutor and lecturer in Jews College the rabbinical training academy of Britain. He was expecting to succeed Rabbi Dr. Isadore Epstein the principal, who was about to retire.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources to Begin the Study of Jewish Law in Conservative Judaism*
    LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 105:3 [2013-15] Resources to Begin the Study of Jewish Law in Conservative Judaism* David Hollander** Conservative Judaism stands at the center of the Jewish ideological spectrum. In that position it strives, sometimes with difficulty, to apply a flexible, modern out- look to an ancient system of binding laws. This bibliography provides law scholars with annotated citations to a selection of important sources related to Jewish law in Conservative Judaism, supplemented by brief explanations of the larger context of the resources. Introduction . 305 Historical Development of Conservative Judaism. 307 Primary Sources of Jewish Law in Conservative Judaism. 310 Secondary Sources of Jewish Law in Conservative Judaism. 316 Jewish Law and Conservative Judaism in Israel. 319 Conclusion . 320 Introduction ¶1 Conservative Judaism is an unfortunately named branch of liberal Judaism.1 If Orthodox Judaism stands on one side of the left-right divide of the Jewish com- munity (the right side), Conservative Judaism is firmly on the opposite (left) side. However, if the Jewish community is divided into those who view Jewish law as binding and those who do not, Conservative Judaism (in theory, at least) is firmly on the side of binding law, the same side as Orthodox Judaism. So Conservative Judaism occupies an uncomfortable position, firmly modern and liberal, while still adhering to a binding legal framework, which is a space largely occupied by the nonliberal camp of Orthodox Judaism. ¶2 This middle space is accompanied by many problems, but despite these problems, the conception of Jewish law offered by the Conservative movement represents an important and comprehensive vision that claims for itself a historical authenticity,2 and that is ideally suited to ensure that the exploration of Jewish law * © David Hollander, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies 2018
    Report of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies 2018–2019 Report of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies Report of the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies 2018–2019 oxford centre for hebrew and jewish studies Contents oxford centre for hebrew and jewish studies The Clarendon Institute Walton Street President’s Message 8 Oxford Highlights of the 2018–2019 Academic Year 10 ox1 2hg Tel: 01865 610422 People Email: [email protected] Academic Staff 22 Website: www.ochjs.ac.uk Board of Governors 25 The Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies is a company, limited by Academic Activities of the Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies guarantee, incorporated in England, Registered No. 1109384 (Registered Charity No. 309720). The Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies is a tax-deductible Oxford Seminar in Advanced Jewish Studies: The Mishnah organization within the United States under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue between Christians and Jews in Early Modern Europe Code (Employer Identification number 13–2943469). The Mishnah between Christians and Jews in Early Modern Europe Dr Piet van Boxel and Professor Joanna Weinberg 28 William Wootton’s Version of Mishnah Shabbat and Eruvin (1718) and the Mishneh Torah in England between the Late-seventeenth and the Early-eighteenth Centuries Marcello Cattaneo 29 Imagining the Mishnah Visually: From Wagenseil to Wotton Professor Richard Cohen 30 Rabbi Jacob Abendana, the Author of a Lost Spanish Translation of the Mishnah Professor Yosef Kaplan 32 Guilielmus
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuing the Quest Selected Writings of Louis Jacobs
    PURSUING THE QUEST SELECTED WRITINGS OF LOUIS JACOBS Includes Full Bibliography Edited and with an introduction by Harry Freedman PhD Editor, Friends of LouisJacobs.org Digitally printed by Ivor Solution Limited, London l vors~ n SI lOP OPEN ,.. EIJITORS SELECTIONS & NFWS I EJ1'U!S PUBLICATIONS \'!1)1 ARTICLES & VIew orHine 30 REVIEWS,.. hours of Rabb• Jacobs teaching Arguments For Plus videos ol Access archives. HXrs 01' Fllends le<:tmes. scrapbook semchable Heaven's Sake! pages on-line Chck h00!P to Vl!'. ll biOQ Lectuees and discussions from 2006 to date EXHIBITION ABO UT RABBI Thoughts of Sign up to regular thoughts email LOUIS JACODS GO ES Loui s Jncobs DIGITAL! A vittualtour of the 0Jtl01d Click here to First Name view thought Cenoe !or l lebtew and Jewish Studies exhibttion at Yamton to date. Submll Manor about Rabbi Louis Em all Jacobs can be seen on line here C:hck llt.ct A1t o 1tl · elt>~J • fl~ • .. ~ ool .,lr wro 1 P "I' • ' R.t.Wo. ,...,,, ... ~..c. , •., ••..n liii!liliii§UCIGIIIi¥'i41ilii'Jj!N I '· lnui .t w• The OKford Cenhe for Hebtew ond Jewish Stud ies ond rt!ends of www.!oulsjacobs.OIQ presenled a major Jewish cormnunlly !nltlat!ve. A mainly loi'KIOII based hom Decembe1 2012 un\11 Ju!le 2013 tan Quest videos of many of the alongside an ncademlc ptogmmme at O!dord 011 : • Alguments 101' Heaven' s sake Otthodoxy. l heotoglcal Debnte nnd Contemporary Judalsm: A Ctitlcal lectUies rue now 0111lne. Exploration of OuesUor1s Raised in the Thouqht of Louis Jacobs Click l ~<' t Ptovif'w Cltrk hPte to view Of iginal ptogmmme
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Prayer Aliyot Hagbah and Gililah the Community
    Jewish Prayer Aliyot Hagbah and Gililah The Community The Friends ofwww.louisjacobs.org souvenir edition Published to commemorate the consecrlltion, in memory ofLouis ]llCobs, ofthe Beit MitlrtUh situlltetl in the New North London Synagogue's new Bui/Jing andpresented to members ofthe Synagogue. Friends oflouisjacobs.org is a registered charity No 113909 Please visit our web site www.louisjacobs.org Printed and typeset by lvor Solution Ltd. Clerkenwell, London EC1V OAH IVOrSOIUtiOn~ Illustrations by Barbara Jackson INTRODUCTION The first book that Rabbi Jacobs wrote was Jewish Prayer. It was a book of just sixty pages, yet as a layman's guide to the subject it was a wonderful exposition. Originally published in 1955, two years after Louis Jacobs became Rabbi at the New West End Synagogue, the book was written as a response to the need of congregants for an open and stimulating essay that could connect them to the Synagogue and help them gain further meaning in their Jewish life. The book was well received and was published in several editions with the last one in 1962. Now fifty years later, it is high time another edition was published and what better time than to commemorate the opening of the new Synagogue in Finchley. As Trustees of the newly formed charity whose aim is to publish online every one of Rabbi Jacobs's articles, we have found Jewish Prayer a source of great strength and value. It remains fresh and relevant, we believe even to an entirely new generation, many of whom may not know that much about the contribution that Rabbi Jacobs has made to understanding Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Judaism: How the Middle Became a Movement
    Conservative Judaism: How the Middle Became a Movement The First Hundred Years of Conservative Judaism. By Rabbi Louis Jacobs Conservative Judaism is the form of the Jewish religion that occupies the middle ground between Orthodoxy and Reform, with its center in the United States, where it is the largest of the three movements, and with adherents in other parts of the world…. The Theoretical Origins of Conservative Judaism The two key thinkers of Conservative Judaism are Zachariah Frankel and Solomon Schechter, the former describes his religious position as that of “positive historic Judaism.” the latter stresses the idea of “Catholic Israel,” that the ultimate seat of authority in Judaism resides in the consensus of the Jewish people as a whole on the meaning of Judaism. The attitudes of Frankel and Schechter were by no means novel in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, where it became obvious to many thinking, observing Jews that, in the light of modern historical investigation into the Bible and the classical sources of Judaism, a reappraisal was required of the whole idea of revelation. For these Jews, the too-neat picture of the doctrine “the Torah is from heaven” as presented in Orthodoxy, was unacceptable, since historical research has demonstrated the developing nature of Jewish religion as it came into contact, throughout its history, with various and differing systems of thought. On the other hand, these Jews saw Reform as too ready to accommodate Judaism to the zeitgeist and to abandon practices and doctrines hallowed by tradition, especially in Reform’s indifference, if not hostility, to the system of Jewish law, the Halakhah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uplifting of Sparks in Later Jewish Mysticism
    e Upliing of Sparks in Later Jewish Mysticism* Louis Jacobs Although for convenience’s sake we shall refer, in this essay, to light as a kabbalistic symbol for the divine, it should be noted that, for the kabbalists themselves, light and the other symbols they use are really more than symbols. ey are not mere pointers to the reality; in a sense they are the reality itself. For the kabbalists, light, for example, really exists on high as a spiritual object. It is that entity which is the true source of physical light. Again, for them, the Hebrew language is not simply a convention. e Hebrew leers are the material form assumed by the sacred alphabet on high. God really did say: ‘Let there be light’ (Gen. :) by combining those spiritual forces represented by the leers alef, waw and resh to form the spiritual word for light, or. Echoes of the Platonic ‘idea’ are heard in all this. Edwyn Bevan has shown how ubiquitous is the light symbol in the religions of humanity: from the earliest times, light has impressed humans as most closely associated with our thoughts of the divine.¹ Among the reasons for the emergence and persistence of the light symbol to represent the divine are that light dispels darkness and so is a symbol for knowledge, for admission into the mysteries, for the sudden realization of the truth, as in the expression ‘a flash of illumination’. In the darkness something hostile may be lurking. ere is danger to life there, making us welcome the safety and security afforded by light.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Communities Rachel Montagu
    63 Diverse communities Rachel Montagu HERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SOCIETY, said Margaret Thatcher, only T family and the individual. This is not a view which could be tenable in a Jewish context where religion is lived out in the community. Family is important, and many rituals take place in the family home, but community, a gathering of families into a congre- gation, is also of vital importance. This article looks at different historical Jewish definitions of what is meant by a community, and also at the way the modem Jewish world has developed different groupings as a result of the varying circumstances and cultures in the countries in which Jews five. Early Jewish definitions of community In the Talmud, the early medieval compendium of the rabbis' legislation and storytelling, the word community is used in a number of different ways. It is used to describe the whole people of Israel as a collective entity. It is used to describe the Jews of any one country, acting collectively, and it is used to describe a synagogue. A synagogue is a group of Jews who pray together but who also function as a social grouping, meeting to support those in need, to organize and enjoy educational activities and to spend time with each other. In the Talmudic period, the divisions between communities were geographical - one of the major influences on the Talmudic legislation was the interaction of the two major Jewish communities of the time, Babylonian and Palestinian. They produced two major sourcebooks, the Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem Talmud, each attuned to the different needs of their community.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NECESSITY, PROBLEMS, and PROMISE of SECOND TEMPLE JUDAISM for DISCUSSIONS of NEW TESTAMENT ESCHATOLOGY Larry R. Helyer* I. T
    JETS 47/4 (December 2004) 597–615 THE NECESSITY, PROBLEMS, AND PROMISE OF SECOND TEMPLE JUDAISM FOR DISCUSSIONS OF NEW TESTAMENT ESCHATOLOGY larry r. helyer* i. the necessity of second temple judaism The study of Second Temple Judaism has reframed evangelical biblical theology. The reason is the presupposition of this paper: Jesus and his apos- tles read the sacred Scriptures of Israel through the lens of Second Temple Judaism.1 As the world of Second Temple Judaism has become better under- stood, so has the background and thought of the NT. NT writers, at numerous points, reveal that they are reading the OT in line with traditional readings derived from Second Temple Judaism. My esteemed mentor, Dr. David Hubbard, used to illustrate the point by saying that the train of revelation, at the end of the OT, enters an intertestamental tunnel. Upon reemerging in the NT period, it obviously carries additional cargo.2 For example, NT writers adopt an eschatological framework, which, though rooted in the OT, receives considerable development and elaboration in the literature of the Second Temple. Whereas the OT depicts God’s saving activity as culminating in a climactic Day of the Lord by at least the first century bc, apocalyptic Judaism views redemptive history as unfolding in a two ages framework, “this age,” inaugurated by creation, and “the age to come,” inaugurated by the Day of the Lord (1 Enoch 71:15; cf. 48:7). The dis- tinctive Christian modification of this framework, traceable to Jesus himself, * Larry Helyer is professor of biblical studies at Taylor University, 236 West Reade Ave., Upland, IN 46989-1001.
    [Show full text]