DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 63/Friday, April 1, 2016/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 63/Friday, April 1, 2016/Notices 18980 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the common thresher shark (Alopias the species (or subspecies) to which it vulpinus) as threatened or endangered belongs. National Oceanic and Atmospheric under the ESA throughout its entire Section 3 of the ESA defines an Administration range, or, as an alternative, to list 6 endangered species as ‘‘any species which is in danger of extinction [Docket No. 141219999–6234–02] distinct population segments (DPSs) of the common thresher shark, as throughout all or a significant portion of RIN 0648–XD680 described in the petition, as threatened its range’’ and a threatened species as or endangered, and designate critical one ‘‘which is likely to become an Endangered and Threatened Wildlife habitat. On April 27, 2015, we received endangered species within the and Plants; Notice of 12-Month Finding a separate petition from Defenders of foreseeable future throughout all or a on Petitions to List the Common Wildlife to list the bigeye thresher shark significant portion of its range.’’ Thus, Thresher Shark and Bigeye Thresher as threatened or endangered throughout in the context of the ESA, the Services Shark as Threatened or Endangered its range, or, as an alternative, to list any interpret an ‘‘endangered species’’ to be Under the Endangered Species Act identified DPSs, should we find they one that is presently at risk of (ESA) exist, as threatened or endangered extinction. A ‘‘threatened species,’’ on species pursuant to the ESA, and to the other hand, is not currently at risk AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries of extinction, but is likely to become so Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and designate critical habitat. We found that the petitioned actions may be warranted in the foreseeable future. In other words, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a key statutory difference between a Commerce. for both species; on March 3, 2015, and August 11, 2015, we published positive threatened and endangered species is ACTION: Notice of 12-month finding and 90-day findings for the common the timing of when a species may be in availability of status review report. thresher (80 FR 11379) and bigeye danger of extinction, either now (endangered) or in the foreseeable future SUMMARY: NMFS has completed thresher (80 FR 48061), respectively, announcing that the petitions presented (threatened). The statute also requires us comprehensive status reviews under the to determine whether any species is Endangered Species Act (ESA) for two substantial scientific or commercial information indicating the petitioned endangered or threatened as a result of species of thresher shark in response to any of the following five factors: The petitions to list those species. These actions of listing each species may be warranted, and explaining the basis for present or threatened destruction, species are the common thresher shark modification, or curtailment of its (Alopias vulpinus) and the bigeye those findings. We also announced the initiation of a status review of both habitat or range; overutilization for thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus). commercial, recreational, scientific, or Based on the best scientific and species, as required by Section 4(b)(3)(a) of the ESA, and requested information educational purposes; disease or commercial information available, predation; the inadequacy of existing including the status review report to inform the agency’s decision on whether the species warranted listing as regulatory mechanisms; or other natural (Young et al., 2015), and after taking or manmade factors affecting its into account efforts being made to endangered or threatened under the ESA. continued existence (ESA, section protect these species, we have 4(a)(1)(A)–(E)). Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the determined that the common thresher Listing Species Under the Endangered ESA requires us to make listing (A. vulpinus) and bigeye thresher (A. Species Act determinations based solely on the best superciliosus) do not warrant listing at scientific and commercial data available this time. We conclude that neither We are responsible for determining after conducting a review of the status species is currently in danger of whether the common and bigeye of the species and after taking into extinction throughout all or a significant thresher sharks are threatened or account efforts being made by any State portion of its range nor likely to become endangered under the ESA (16 U.S.C. or foreign nation or political subdivision so within the foreseeable future. 1531 et seq.). To make this thereof to protect the species. In DATES: This finding was made on April determination, we first consider evaluating the efficacy of existing 1, 2016. whether a group of organisms protective efforts, we rely on the constitutes a ‘‘species’’ under Section 3 ADDRESSES: The status review report for Services’ joint Policy on Evaluation of of the ESA, then whether the status of common and bigeye thresher sharks is Conservation Efforts When Making the species qualifies it for listing as available electronically at: http:// Listing Decisions (‘‘PECE’’; 68 FR 15100; either threatened or endangered. Section www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/ March 28, 2003) for any conservation 3 of the ESA defines species to include common-thresher-shark.html and http:// efforts that have not been implemented, ‘‘any subspecies of fish or wildlife or www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/ or have been implemented but not yet plants, and any distinct population bigeye-thresher-shark.html. You may demonstrated effectiveness. segment of any species of vertebrate fish also receive a copy by submitting a or wildlife which interbreeds when Status Review request to the Office of Protected mature.’’ On February 7, 1996, NMFS We convened a team of agency Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service scientists to conduct the status review Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, (USFWS; together, the Services) adopted for the common and bigeye thresher Attention: Thresher Shark 12-month a policy describing what constitutes a sharks and prepare a report. The status Finding. DPS of a taxonomic species (61 FR review report of common and bigeye FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4722). The joint DPS policy identified thresher sharks (Young et al., 2015) Chelsey Young, NMFS, Office of two elements that must be considered compiles the best available information Protected Resources, (301) 427–8491. when identifying a DPS: (1) The on the status of both species as required SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: discreteness of the population segment by the ESA, provides an evaluation of in relation to the remainder of the the discreteness and significance of Background species (or subspecies) to which it populations in terms of the DPS policy, On August 26, 2014, we received a belongs; and (2) the significance of the and assesses the current and future petition from Friends of Animals to list population segment to the remainder of extinction risk for both species, focusing VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 Mar 31, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN2.SGM 01APN2 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Notices 18981 primarily on threats related to the five abundance, threats, and extinction risk temperate waters (Moreno et al., 1989; statutory factors set forth above. We is attributable to the status review Goldman, 2009). In the North Atlantic, appointed a biologist in the Office of report. However, we have common thresher sharks occur from Protected Resources Endangered independently applied the statutory Newfoundland, Canada, to Cuba in the Species Conservation Division to provisions of the ESA, including west and from Norway and the British undertake a scientific review of the life evaluation of the factors set forth in Isles to the African coast in the east history and ecology, distribution, Section 4(a)(1)(A)–(E), our regulations (Gervelis and Natanson, 2013). Landings abundance, and threats to common and regarding listing determinations, and along the South Atlantic coast of the bigeye thresher sharks. Next, we our DPS policy in making the 12-month United States and in the Gulf of Mexico convened a team of biologists and shark finding determination. are rare. Common thresher sharks also experts (hereinafter referred to as the occur along the Atlantic coast of South Extinction Risk Analysis (ERA) team) to Life History, Biology, and Status of the America from Venezuela to southern conduct extinction risk analyses for Petitioned Species Common Thresher Argentina. In the eastern Atlantic, the both species, using the information in Shark (Alopias vulpinus) common thresher ranges from the the scientific review. The ERA team was Taxonomy and Species Description central coast of Norway south to, and comprised of a fishery management including, the Mediterranean Sea and All thresher sharks belong to the specialist from NMFS’ Highly Migratory down the African coast to the Ivory family Alopiidae, genus Alopias, and Species Management Division, four Coast. They appear to be most abundant are classified as mackerel sharks (Order research fishery biologists from NMFS’ along the Iberian coastline, particularly Lamniformes). Thresher sharks are Southeast, Northeast, Southwest, and during spring and fall. Specimens have recognized by their elongated upper Pacific Island Fisheries Science Centers, also been recorded at Cape Province, and two natural resource management caudal lobe (tail fin) almost equal to its South Africa (Goldman, 2009). In the specialists with NMFS’ Office of body length, which is unique to the Indian Ocean, the common thresher is Protected Resources. The ERA team had Alopiidae family. There are currently found along the east coast of Somalia, group expertise in shark biology and three recognized species of thresher and in waters adjacent to the the ecology, population dynamics, highly shark: common thresher (Alopias Maldive Islands and Chagos migratory species management, and vulpinus), bigeye thresher (Alopias archipelago. The species is also present stock assessment science.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish Leather, Anyone?
    Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Aquaculture Department SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository http://repository.seafdec.org.ph Journals/Magazines Aqua Farm News 1995 Fish leather, anyone? Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department (1995). Fish leather, anyone? Aqua Farm News, 13(1), 16-17, 18. http://hdl.handle.net/10862/2458 Downloaded from http://repository.seafdec.org.ph, SEAFDEC/AQD's Institutional Repository Fish leather, anyone? SHARK LEATHER a) the existing leather tannery infrastruc­ Previously regarded as a by-catch of lim­ ture is well-developed especially around Ma­ ited potential, shark is now targetted by small- dras; scale fishermen in the Bay of Bengal for leather b) operating costs are relatively low; and production. c) offshore resources of sharks are not Fish, let alone shark, does not conjure up sufficiently tapped at present. images of leather goods unlike cow, goat or An environmentally significant point is that crocodile. shark and fish leathers in general are essentially The method of obtaining the raw material food industry by-products which would otherwise and the specialized nature of the market hamper be wasted. Other exotic leathers produced from success in this field and general awareness of crocodile and snake, for example, have negative potential. connotations in this respect in spite of their Shark is a hunted resource often captured increased production through culture. by small-scale fishermen only as by-catch, and primarily landed for its meat. It may therefore be Offshore resources difficult to obtain a regular supply of raw material The offshore zone is the realm of the large for what is a totally different industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice in the Prevention of Shark Finning
    Best practice in the prevention of shark finning Brautigam, A. 2020. Best Practice in the Prevention of Shark Finning. Published by the Marine Stewardship Council [www.msc.org]. This work is licensed under Creative Commons BY 4.0 to view a copy of this license, visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Marine Stewardship Council. Best Practice in the Prevention of Shark Finning FINAL Report to the Marine Stewardship Council Amie Bräutigam, Consultant 7 July 2020 Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Best Practice in the Prevent of Shark Finning FINAL Report – 7 July 2020 Table of Contents Acronyms, Abbreviations and Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................... .2 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Best Practice in the Prevention of Shark Finning – Scope and Methods.....……………………………………………...3 A. Scope…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..3 B. Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 III. Findings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 A. Prevalence and Evolution of Fins Naturally Attached (FNA) Globally………………………………………..………..5 C. Taxonomic Coverage of Shark Finning Bans and FNA Requirements ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Traceability Study in Shark Products
    Traceability study in shark products Dr Heiner Lehr (Photo: © Francisco Blaha, 2015) Report commissioned by the CITES Secretariat This publication was funded by the European Union, through the CITES capacity-building project on aquatic species Contents 1 Summary.................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Structure of the remaining document ............................................................................. 9 1.2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 10 2 The market chain ................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Shark Products ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Shark fins ............................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Shark meat ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.3 Shark liver oil ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Shark cartilage ....................................................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Shark skin ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Examining the Shark Trade As a Tool for Conservation
    Re-examining the shark trade as a tool for conservation Shelley Clarke1 Shark encounters of the comestible Therefore, while sharks have become conspicuous as entertainment since the 1970s, they have been impor- kind tant as commodities for centuries. Telling the tale of public fascination with sharks usually begins with the blockbuster release of the movie “Jaws” In September 2014, the implementation of multiple in the summer of 1975. This event more than any other new listings for sharks and rays by the Convention on is credited with sparking a demonization of sharks that International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of has continued for decades (Eilperin 2011). In recent Wild Fauna and Flora (Box 1), underscored the need to years, less deadly but equally adrenalin-charged shark re-kindle interest in using trade information to comple- interactions, including cage diving, hand-feeding and ment fisheries monitoring. These CITES listings are a even shark riding, have captured the public’s attention spur to integrate international trade information with through ecotourism, television and social media. These fishery management mechanisms in order to better reg- more positive encounters (at least for most humans), in ulate shark harvests and to anticipate future pressures combination with many high-profile shark conservation and threats. To highlight both the importance and com- campaigns, have turned large numbers from shark hat- plexity of this integration, this article will explore four ers to shark lovers, and mobilized political support for common suppositions about the relationship between shark protection around the world. shark fishing and trade and point to areas where further work is necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Info Sheet
    Methyl Mercury The danger from the sea Report by SHARKPROJECT International • Aug. 31, 2008 Updated by Shark Safe Network Sept. 12, 2009 ! SHARK MEAT CONTAINS HIGH LEVELS OF METHYL MERCURY: A DANGEROUS NEUROTOXIN In the marine ecosystem sharks are on top of the food chain. Sharks eat other contaminated fish and accumulate all of the toxins that they’ve absorbed or ingested during their lifetimes. Since mercury is a persistent toxin, the levels keep building at every increasing concentrations on the way up the food chain. For this reason sharks can have levels of mercury in their bodies that are 10,000 times higher than their surrounding environment. Many predatory species seem to manage high doses of toxic substances quite well. This is not the case, however, with humans on whom heavy metal contamination takes a large toll. Sharks at the top end of the marine food chain are the final depots of all the poisons of the seas. And Methyl Mercury is one of the biologically most active and most dangerous poisons to humans. Numerous scientific publications have implicated methyl mercury as a highly dangerous poison. Warnings from health organizations to children and pregnant women to refrain from eating shark and other large predatory fish, however, have simply not been sufficient, since this “toxic food-information” is rarely provided at the point of purchase. Which Fish Have the Highest Levels of Methyl Mercury? Predatory fish with the highest levels of Methyl Mercury include Shark, King Mackerel, Tilefish and Swordfish. Be aware that shark is sold under various other names, such as Flake, Rock Salmon, Cream Horn, Smoked Fish Strips, Dried cod/stockfish, Pearl Fillets, Lemonfish, Verdesca (Blue Shark), Smeriglio (Porbeagle Shark), Palombo (Smoothound), Spinarolo (Spiny Dogfish), and as an ingredient of Fish & Chips or imitation crab meat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks Are a Top Predator of the Ocean
    Shark Finning Tiana Barron-Wright Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks are a top predator of the ocean. However, sharks are a target Shark fin soup originated in 968 AD by an emperor from the Sung The Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000, was signed by former Sharks play an important role in the ecosystem. Sharks maintain the for humans. Shark finning is the process of cutting off a shark’s Dynasty. The emperor created shark fin soup to display his wealth, President Bill Clinton. This act prohibited the process of shark finning in species below them in the ecosystem and serve as a health indicator for the fins while it is still alive and throwing the shark back into the power and generosity towards his guest. Serving shark fin soup the United States. This bans anyone in the United States jurisdiction from ocean. The decrease of sharks in the oceans has led to the decline of coral ocean where it will die. After getting their fins cut off, some sharks shark finning, owning shark fins without the shark’s body, and landing reefs, sea grass beds, and the loss of commercial fisheries. Without sharks was seen as a show of respect. Chinese Emperors thought the dish in the ecosystem, other predators can thrive. For example, groupers can can starve to death, get eaten by other fish or drown to death. shark fins without the body. This act also has NOAA (National Oceanic had medicinal benefits. Shark fin soup is considered a delicacy in and Atmospheric Administration) Fisheries to give Congress a report increase in numbers and eat herbivores.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Shark Finning and Why Is It Harmful?
    What is shark finning and why is it harmful? Shark finning is defined as the onboard removal of a shark’s fins and the discarding of the body at sea. This practice poses a significant threat to many shark stocks and to the health of marine ecosystems. It is also a threat to traditional fisheries and to food security in some low-income countries. A threat to sharks Tens of millions of sharks are finned every year. Once the shark has been discarded, the fins can be dried on deck, eliminating the need for freezer space. It is therefore inherently unsustainable, since it allows fishers to catch an almost unlimited number of sharks. This greatly increases the threat to sharks and, by removing large numbers of top predators from marine ecosystems, is likely to have dramatic and negative impacts on other species, including commercially-important species. Predictive modelling has shown that the removal of sharks from their ecosystems can have unpredictable and often devastating impacts on other species. Sharks are highly vulnerable to over-exploitation, owing to their slow growth, long gestation and low reproductive output. Over-exploited shark stocks can take years or even decades to recover. Some European shark fisheries that were closed fifty years ago remain so, as the populations have yet to recover. The threat of over-exploitation is exacerbated by the lengthy migrations undertaken by many shark species. Even if they are protected in one area, sharks can move into areas where they are not subject to protection. A threat to shark management Gathering and analysing catch data is the sine qua non of shark conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharks in the Seas Around Us: How the Sea Around Us Project Is Working to Shape Our Collective Understanding of Global Shark Fisheries
    Sharks in the seas around us: How the Sea Around Us Project is working to shape our collective understanding of global shark fisheries Leah Biery1*, Maria Lourdes D. Palomares1, Lyne Morissette2, William Cheung1, Reg Watson1, Sarah Harper1, Jennifer Jacquet1, Dirk Zeller1, Daniel Pauly1 1Sea Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2UNESCO Chair in Integrated Analysis of Marine Systems. Université du Québec à Rimouski, Institut des sciences de la mer; 310, Allée des Ursulines, C.P. 3300, Rimouski, QC, G5L 3A1, Canada Report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts by the Sea Around Us project December 9, 2011 *Corresponding author: [email protected] Sharks in the seas around us Table of Contents FOREWORD........................................................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 SHARK BIODIVERSITY IS THREATENED ............................................................................. 10 SHARK-RELATED LEGISLATION ............................................................................................. 13 SHARK FIN TO BODY WEIGHT RATIOS ................................................................................ 14
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHARK and RAY MEAT NETWORK a DEEP DIVE INTO a GLOBAL AFFAIR 2021 Editor Evan Jeffries (Swim2birds)
    THE SHARK AND RAY MEAT NETWORK A DEEP DIVE INTO A GLOBAL AFFAIR 2021 Editor Evan Jeffries (Swim2birds) Communications Stefania Campogianni (WWF MMI), Magdalena Nieduzak (WWF-Int) Layout Bianco Tangerine Authors Simone Niedermüller (WWF MMI), Gill Ainsworth (University of Santiago de Compostela), Silvia de Juan (Institute of Marine Sciences ICM (CSIC)), Raul Garcia (WWF Spain), Andrés Ospina-Alvarez (Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies IMEDEA (UIB- CSIC)), Pablo Pita (University of Santiago de Compostela), Sebastián Villasante (University of Santiago de Compostela) Acknowledgements Serena Adam (WWF-Malaysia), Amierah Amer (WWF-Malaysia), Monica Barone, Andy Cornish (WWF-Int), Marco Costantini (WWF MMI), Chitra Devi (WWF-Malaysia), Giuseppe di Carlo (WWF MMI), Caio Faro (WWF Brazil), Chester Gan (WWF-Singapore), Ioannis Giovos (iSea), Pablo Guerrero (WWF-Ecuador), Théa Jacob (WWF-France), Shaleyla Kelez (WWF-Peru), Patrik Krstinić (WWF-Adria), Giulia Prato (WWF-Italy), Rita Sayoun (WWF-France), Umair Shahid (WWF-Pakistan), Vilisoni Tarabe (WWF-Pacific), Jose Luis Varas (WWF-Spain), Eduardo Videira (WWF-Mozambique), Ranny R. Yuneni (WWF-Indonesia), Heike Zidowitz (WWF-Germany). Special acknowledgments to contribution of Glenn Sant (TRAFFIC). Special acknowledgements go to WWF-Spain for funding the scientific part of this report. For contact details and further information, please visit our website at wwfmmi.org Cover photo: © Monica Barone / WWF Safesharks Back cover photo: © Matthieu Lapinski / Ailerons WWF 2021 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 SHARKS AND RAYS IN CRISIS 6 THE OVERALL TRADE VALUE 7 GLOBAL NETWORK ANALYSIS 8 SHARK MEAT TRADE 10 RAY MEAT TRADE 18 THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE SHARK AND RAY TRADE 26 A GLOBAL SELECTION OF DISHES WITH SHARK AND RAY MEAT 28 RECOMMENDATIONS 30 © Nuno Queirós (APECE) / WWF 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHARKS AND RAYS ARE IN CRISIS GLOBALLY Up to 100 million are killed each year, and some populations have declined by more than 95% as a result of overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Caracterización Del Riesgo Por Exposición a Metilmercurio Por Consumo No Intencional De Carne De Tiburón En Mujeres De México
    MONOGRÁFICO 167 Caracterización del riesgo por exposición a metilmercurio por consumo no intencional de carne de tiburón en mujeres de México Caracterização do risco de exposição à metilmercurio do consumo não intencional de carne de tubarão em mulheres do México Characterization of the Risk of Exposure to Methylmercury Due to the Non- intentional Consumption of Shark Meat by Mexican Women Laura Elizalde-Ramírez, Patricia Ramírez-Romero, Guadalupe Reyes-Victoria, Edson Missael Flores-García Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, México. Cita: Elizalde-Ramírez L, Ramírez-Romero P, Reyes-Victoria G, Flores-García EM. Risk characterization of exposure to methylmercury due to non-intentional consumption of shark meat in females from Mexico. Rev. salud ambient. 2020; 20(2):167-178. Recibido: 27 de mayo de 2020. Aceptado: 10 de noviembre de 2020. Publicado: 15 de diciembre de 2020. Autor para correspondencia: Patricia Ramírez-Romero. Correo e: [email protected] Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México. Financiación: Proyecto “Indicadores de integridad ecológica y salud ambiental”, de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana de México, programa de posgrado en Energía y Medio Ambiente (PEMA) y el Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT, México) a través del M. Sc. Beca No. 659582. Declaración de conflicto de intereses: Los autores declaran que no existen conflictos de intereses que hayan influido en la realización y la preparación de este trabajo. Declaraciones de autoría: Todos los autores contribuyeron al diseño del estudio y la redacción del artículo. Asimismo todos los autores aprobaron la versión final. Abstract Concern about the health risks due to the consumption of shark meat arose in two previous studies in which shark meat with high concentrations of methylmercury (MeHg) and fish meat with up to 60 % substitution with shark meat were documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Fishing and the Fin Trade in Ghana: a Biting Review
    Plenty of Fish in the Sea? Shark Fishing and the Fin Trade in Ghana: A Biting Review Max J. Gelber A Field Practicum Report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Sustainable Development Practice Degree at the University of Florida, in Gainesville, FL USA May 2018 Supervisory Committee: Dr. Paul Monaghan, Chair Dr. Renata Serra, Member Men hauling in their shark catch in Shama, Ghana. (Author’s photo, 2017) Acknowledgements This project was supported through generous funding from UF’s Center for African Studies, Center for Latin American Studies, and Master of Sustainable Development Practice (MDP) program. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Paul Monaghan and Dr. Renata Serra, and the MDP program’s administration, Dr. Glenn Galloway and Dr. Andrew Noss, for their invaluable guidance and support over the past two years. Through thick and thin, these professors have remained by my side, encouraging me to continue to achieve as a lifelong learner; for this, I am forever gracious. I would also like to thank Mr. Samuel Kofi Darkwa (Ph.D student in Political Science at West Virginia University), my language instructor at the 2016 African Flagship Languages Initiative (AFLI) Domestic Intensive Summer Program at UF, and Mr. Mohammed Kofi Mustapha (Ph.D student in Anthropology at the UF), for teaching me Akan/Twi. Their dedication and support have been instrumental in the planning and execution of this project. I believe that the study of language serves as the premier gateway to better understanding people and culture, and my experience learning Akan/Twi has reinforced this belief in so many ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Shark Fin Trade to and from Australia
    MANAGEMENT Scalloped hammerhead sharks OF SHARK FIN TRADE TO AND FROM AUSTRALIA In preparing this report the author has made all reasonable efforts to ensure the information it contains is based on evidence. The TABLE OF CONTENTS views expressed in this report are those of the author based on that evidence. The author does not guarantee that there is not further evidence relevant to the matters covered 1. Executive Summary 2 by this report and therefore urges those with an interest in these matters to conduct their own due 2. Introduction 5 diligence and to draw their own conclusions. 3. Shark Fin Trade 7 Trends in shark fin trade 8 Australian shark fin trade 13 4. Shark Fishery Management 17 5. Fins Naturally Attached 23 6. Traceability 29 Principle 1: Unique Identification 31 Principle 2: Data Capture and Management 31 Principle 3: Data Communication 33 7. Managing International Trade 34 8. Conclusion 36 Annex A – Protected Species as of October 2020 38 Annex B – Country Specific HS Codes for Shark Fin 40 Annex C – Fisheries Specific Shark Management Measures 45 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Healthy shark populations are an indicator of the health of the marine environment. Sharks play This report looks at the current trends in the global a key role in marine and estuarine environments, and people around the world rely on healthy shark fin trade and actions that Australia can take marine ecosystems for their livelihoods. It has been predicted that by 2033, shark based eco- to drive improvement in the shark fin industry, tourism will be worth more than 785 million USD.
    [Show full text]