DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Devon County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Devon County Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Devon County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents M-Z Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Devon County Personal Details: Name: Patricia Wendy Machin E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Bishopsteignton Residents Association Comment text: I have been a resident of Bishopsteignton for 17'years and am a member of the local residents association. I feel very strongly that it would not be in the best interests of this village to exclude it from the area of Teignmouth, as this is where most people go for shopping and services. The boundary of the A 380 and the extensive building there recently makes it difficult to get into Kingsteignton, whereas Teignmouth adjoins our village and is very accessible. The boundary between the two is not well marked and we identify with and share facilities and activities very much with Teignmouth and Shaldon. Our recent village festival was well attended by Teignmouth Residents and many people here are involved in organisations there, especially sailing and rowing, local churches and choirs, political groups and the arts. We feel very much a coastal area and our identity is here. We have a very active and strong local identity which includes Teignmouth and is highly valued by the people who live and visit here. Please do not change that, for the sake of political expediency. If democracy and local participation in the governance of this area means anything, I hope and trust that you will listen and take account of the views of the residents of Bishopsteignton. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/5549 06/07/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Devon County Personal Details: Name: John Macnab E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Joining Kingsteignton and Bishopsteignton is nonsensical. Bishopsteignton is a a village on the Teign Estuary. Kingsteignton is an urban adjunct of Newton Abbot. Bishopsteigtnon has much more in common with the other villages on the esturary, even Teignmouth, than it has with Kingsteignton. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/5545 06/07/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Devon County Personal Details: Name: susan martin E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I think Bishopsteignton should stay within the Teignmouth boundary,out children go to Teignmouth schools We use Teignmouth shops and facilities, we do not associate with kingsteignton, I think changing to the Taintons is a stupid idea. I winder how long developers step in and start building. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/5575 06/07/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Devon County Personal Details: Name: Paul McFadden E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I consider the proposed new Yealmpton Division to fail the stated aim of the new divisions to reflect the interests and identities of local communities. As a resident of South Devon for nearly 10 years, I believe that the communities of Holne, Scorriton and Dean Prior tend to look towards Buckfastleigh, whilst those of South Brent, Harbourneford, Rattery, North Huish and Diptford tend to look towards Totnes. Certainly, there is very little association between those communities and villages such as Noss Mayo, Newton Ferrers and Yealmpton. Furthermore, there is no recognised Market Town within the division that would provide a sense of cohesion between these disparate communities. I get the sense that this proposed division is the 'bit that was left' after other more obvious divisions, strongly tied to specific Market Towns and their surrounding parishes, were drawn up. Not a good result for the residents of the communities within this proposed division. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/5242 18/05/2015 Pascoe, Mark From: Shan Merritt < Sent: 07 July 2015 05:03 To: reviews Subject: Boundaries review - East Devon Hi there I have had problems accessing the correct area to comment on the consultation re boundaries review in East Devon, so my comments are shown here: Re the proposed new 'Otter Valley' county division: While there is some sense in shifting the parish of Newton Poppleford & Harpford away from Budleigh and into the proposed new ‘Otter Valley’ county division, it would be nonsensical to do the same with East Budleigh, Otterton, Bicton, and Colaton Raleigh. Keep East Budleigh, Otterton, Bicton and Colaton Raleigh in the Budleigh division, but move Newton Pop & Harpford etc. to join Ottery St Mary in the new Otter Valley division. The district of East Devon has a number of barriers which are effective divisions in themselves; these include the A30 and the A3052. Communities are divided from one another by these barriers, and in some cases such as the actual village of Newton Poppleford the village itself is split (a very local north south divide). East Budleigh, Otterton, Colaton Raleigh and Bicton are all in the 'south of the A3052' area and do not have any substantial links to Ottery St Mary, but do link with Budleigh Salterton, and in the case of Otterton perhaps to Sidmouth. I have not been able to obtain elector figures for each parish ward within East Devon, only for complete parishes, so cannot at present suggest a more appropriate and equitable redistribution for the proposed new Otter Valley division. It would be desirable at the same time to develop a new parish of Tipton St John and Venn Ottery, which would include the parish wards of Tipton St John (currently part of Ottery St Mary) and Venn Ottery (part of Newton Pop parish). This new parish would still be included in the Otter Valley division. ****************************** I trust you will include these comments appropriately in the review process. Regards Shân Merritt 1 Pascoe, Mark From: Sent: 05 July 2015 21:30 To: reviews Subject: Devon County Council - Local Government Boundary Review Dear Sir As a resident of the Littleham area of Exmouth, I wish to protest in the strongest possible terms at your bizarre proposals in your Devon County Council boundary recommendations to merge Littleham with Budleigh Salterton to make a new 'Budleigh Salterton Coastal' seat.. I understand that one of your key purposes is to achieve broad equality of electorates in the electoral divisions of the County. But that objective cannot possibly be achieved while sacrificing your other two fundamental objectives, namely, first, respect for local identities and community interests; and, second, to deliver effective and efficient local government. As the largest town in Devon, Exmouth deserves better. Its democratic representation should clearly reflect the whole town – not be chopped up, and redistributed to where it has no community links, solely to satisfy the Commission’s arithmetic. It is absolute nonsense to propose cutting Exmouth in two, with Littleham Ward tacked on to Budleigh Salterton. How can you possibly claim there is a shared identity or community interest in this proposed arrangement? The urban areas in each separate community are not even contiguous, but are separated by open countryside.. And yet you seem to think there is more identity of interest in the proposed arrangement than there is in Littleham being aligned with roads on the northern side of Salterton Road in Exmouth? On multiple levels, you must know that this is palpably untrue. It is also the case that, if your persist in this proposal, against local opinion, you will be doing great damage to to your third operating principal - the delivery of effective and efficient local government. You propose creating a division almost evenly split between two diametrically opposed community interests of Exmouth and Budleigh. Whatever political party (or independent) candidates contesting such a seat, they will almost certainly be drawn from one half of the division or the other. The County Councillor elected will inevitably be faced with the unenviable task of trying to represent the complete division but with half of the electorate, and in each case a strong Town Council, convinced that this cannot be the case. This is far from being an effective platform for the delivery of efficient local government and in providing effective democratic representation. I also wish to express my total opposition to the proposal for creating a rare double-member seat covering part of the rest of Exmouth. There is no necessity for this - two single member seats can be delineated without undue difficulty - but your recommendation will make representation more remote and less accountable.Interestingly, you seem to think that virtually no other area of Devon should be provided with double-member divisions, apart from the two instances you propose. This is blatant discrimination. Taken together, you seem to be on a mission to diminish and disregard the identity and political unity of Exmouth. This is unacceptable to me and to many living in Littleham who are aware of your proposals (which, I am afraid, are far too little known and appreciated). I understand that your task is not easy. But it would be a great deal easier if you were working to a 62-strong County Council, (as at present) rather than following Devon CC's desire to save money by cutting representation to 60. It is, in my view, much more important that your proposal makes democratic sense and meets all three of the basic criteria of your review, rather than it creates the injustices I have referred to above, for the sake of minimal savings in the public purse.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Primary Care Networks
    DEVON LPC PHARMACY MAPPING FOR PRIMARY CARE NETWORKS (Updated 25 May 2021) NORTHERN PRIMARY CARE NETWORKS NETWORK & GEOGRAPHY CLINICAL DIRECTOR PRACTICE NAME COMMUNITY PHARMACIES NOMINATED LEAD LIST SIZE PHARMACIST Torridge Bideford Dr Adam Kwiatkowski Bideford Medical Centre Arnolds Pharmacy, Westward Ho Chrissie Walkey 51,136 Hartland [email protected] Castle Gardens Surgery Asda Pharmacy, Bideford Lloyds Pharmacy, Torrington Torrington Hartland Surgery Boots, High Street, Bideford ODS Code:FX967 Northam Surgery Boots, The Old Library, Northam Torrington Health Centre Bideford Pharmacy, Bideford [email protected] Wooda Surgery Lloyds Pharmacy, High Street, Torrington Lloyds Pharmacy, Wooda Surgery, Bideford Well Pharmacy, High Street, Bideford Barnstaple Barnstaple Dr Sophia Erdozain Brannam Medical Centre Bear Street, Pharmacy, Barnstaple Vacancy Alliance [email protected] Fremington Medical Boots, Fremington 49,301 Centre Boots, Roundswell, Barnstaple Litchdon Medical Centre Boots, High Street, Barnstaple Dr Oliver Hassall Queens Medical Centre Lloyds Pharmacy, Litchdon MC, Barnstaple [email protected] Lloyds Pharmacy, Gratton Way, Barnstaple Lloyds Pharmacy, Brannams Square, Barnstaple Tesco Pharmacy, Station Road, Barnstaple Holsworthy, Holsworthy Dr Mike Dowling Bradworthy Surgery Boots, Holsworthy Medical Centre, Holsworthy Dudley Taylor, Bude Cornwall Bude, and Bradworthy Dr Chloe Carey Neetside Surgery Lloyds Pharmacy, The Square, Holsworthy Pam Irwin Surrounding Black Ruby Country Medical [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Report
    PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT Case Officer: Adam Williams Parish: North Huish Ward: South Brent Application No: 3498/19/FUL Agent/Applicant: Applicant: Mr Ian Hodgson - DMR Design Mr & Mrs C Collins The Acorn Centre 23 Southfield Avenue Oak Court Preston Lee Mill Industrial Estate, Iv Paignton PL21 9GP TQ3 1LH Site Address: Newpark Stables, North Huish Development: Proposed Manege Area to be used in conjunction with existing Stables development. Reason item is being put before Committee Cllrs Pannell and Smerdon wish the Committee to consider the relationship of the proposed development to the AONB and whether there is any impact on neighbour amenity Recommendation: Conditional Approval Conditions 1. Standard Time 2. Standard Plans 3. Not for commercial use 4. Additional landscaping 5. Land returned if no longer used 6. Drainage details 7. No outside lighting Key issues for consideration: The principle of development in the countryside, landscape impacts in particular impacts on the AONB, and amenity. Site Description: The site comprises a piece of land and some stables near Diptford, used for keeping horses, the stables are prohibited from livery functions. The site is in open countryside, within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The site itself is set behind a hedgerow and trees and has limited visibility from the public highway The Proposal: The proposal seeks permission to construct a ménage measuring 40x30m, the works will involve the formation of banking as part of the ‘cut & fill’ exercise in constructing/siting a flat area into a land that has a sloping topography Consultations: County Highways Authority - no comments SHDC Drainage - This is an application for the provision of a sand school, therefore we have no comments.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT WINNERS 2018 Pictured Are Kingsteignton Brownies and Rainbows with Their Leaders
    GARDEN, CRAFT & HOBBY FAYRE On the morning of Saturday 28th July, at 11 am, the sun shone down as our Town Crier, Mrs Jackie Edwards officially opened the 10th annual show and although it was a little blustery, many people and stall holders got the day underway. In the exhibits marquee we had a fantastic display of handcrafted items, homemade cakes, preserves, home grown flowers and fruit and veg. as well as some superb amateur photography, all of which were put on display by many of our truly talented residents. Presentations of cups, shields and certificates were made by Mayor, Cllr Ron Peart accompanied by his wife, Mayoress June Peart, with the exception of the Kingsteignton Village Trust Cup, which was won by Ron himself and was presented by Town Clerk, Carol Lakin. Pictured above L—R: Town Clerk, Carol Lakin presenting Mayor, Cllr Ron Peart winner of Best in Fruit & Veg. Hilary Barnett winner of Kingsteignton Craft Cup for Best Art Exhibit, pictured with Mayoress, June Peart, Louise Stoddart winner of the Mayoral Cup for Best Craft, Lindsay Rose winner of the Kingsteignton Town Photography Cup for Best Photographic Exhibit and Sandra Davies winner of Domestic Science Cup for Best Domestic Sci- ence Exhibit. Pictured opposite L-R: Isaac Berry winner of Age 8-11 year olds & Milly Gubby winner of 5-7 years. Mayor Cllr Ron Peart, Sarah Whatty winner of Best in Childrens Art Shield and Mayoress June Peart. The competition for the childrens organised groups which was to design some- thing to the theme of ‘ Fly Me to the Moon’ brought some creative pieces of work to the show and earnt their groups some rewarding funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Stags.Co.Uk 01803 865454 | [email protected]
    stags.co.uk 01803 865454 | [email protected] Larcombe Corner, Diptford Totnes, TQ9 7PD A smartly presented four bedroom bungalow offering flexible accommodation set in its own mature gardens and woodland. Totnes 6 miles Plymouth 16 miles Exeter 30 miles • Ample natural light and natural wood finishes • A flexible four bedroom home Set in rural location • Additional 2-room studio • Viewing highly recommended • Underfloor heating • Guide price £649,000 Cornwall | Devon | Somerset | Dorset | London Larcombe Corner, Diptford, Totnes, TQ9 7PD SITUATION Currently occupied by two families with two Larcombe Corner is situated within the small hamlet separate kitchen/dining areas, with decking along of Larcombe. A short drive away is the sought-after the front of the bungalow and gardens and village of Diptford which offers a strong village woodland extending to approximately 0.7 of an acre community. Totnes is approximately 7 miles and is a make this an ideal family home or would suit multi bustling and thriving market town, that retains generational living. The 2 room studio situated over much of its original character, full of interest with a looking the pond offers potential for further wide range of good local schools, shopping facilities development subject to planning permissions. and recreational pursuits including indoor swimming pool and boating opportunities on the River Dart. ACCOMMODATION Totnes has a mainline railway station to London (Please see accompanying floorplan). Entrance porch Paddington 2 ¾ hours.Located a short distance to to inner hall with solid wooden floors. Living/dining the village of Diptford and easily accessible to the room with solid wooden floors with under floor town of Totnes and the A38 providing onward heating, double doors onto decked area.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower River Otter Options
    Haycock, Suite 1, Deer Park Business Centre, Eckington, Pershore, Worcestershire, WR10 3DN t +44 (0)1386 750642 e [email protected] www.haycock-associates.co.uk Lower River Otter: Long term options for drainage and flood management Client Clinton Devon Estates Author Dr. N.E. Haycock Date 18th December 2009 updated 16th February 2010 Version 3 rivers soils hydrology landscapes Haycock Associates Limited. Registered in England No. 03934665 VAT No. GB 658 1644 14 Registered office: Red Roof, Wick Road, Little Comberton, Pershore, Worcestershire WR10 3EG. Haycock Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Aims of the Report 2 Introduction 2 Background 4 Catchment Topography and Geology 4 Lower Otter Topography and Geology 6 Catchment Hydrology 8 Current Drainage Layout 10 Recorded Flood Events 12 Tidal Levels and Data and its Current Influence 16 Historical Periods and Accounts of the Lower Otter Valley 18 Hydraulic Model of the Lower Otter Valley 20 Flood Dynamics - Fluvial 20 Flood Dynamics - Tidal 25 Flood Dynamics - Drainage 29 Predicted Sea Level and Flood Regime 29 Conclusions Arising from the Simulation Flood Models. 30 Long Term Options for Drainage and Flood Management 31 Option A - Cricket Ground Bund 32 Option B - Relocation of Cricket Ground 34 Haycock Option C - South Farm Road 35 Option D - River Otter floodplain at White Bridge. 37 Option E - Southern Big Marsh (linked to option B, C and D). 38 Option F - Northern Big Marsh 40 Option K - River Otter Big Bank Reach 42 Option G - Little Bank and Swale 43 Option H - Otterton Mill and Otterton Bridge 44 Summary of Options - Table 5 47 Overview and recommendations 48 Key Documentation 49 Appendix A: Long section through the Lime Kiln Culvert (Howick and Partners, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • DEYQNSHI~E. , (KEL~Y's
    888 FAR DEYQNSHI~E. , (KEL~Y's FARMERS continued. Turner James, West Upham, Cheriton Vale W.Lit Hele,Bradworthy,Holswrthy Tucker Richard, Yeatheridge, East Fitzpaine, Crediton Valentine Mrs. Mary, Crockers, Dun- Worlington, Morchard B1shop R.S.O Turner J. Colehill, Werrington,Launcstn keswell Abbey, Cullompton Tucker Rt.Leigh,MorchardBishopR.S.O Turner Jn. Combe,Abbotsham, Bideford Vanstone J.\Irs. Elizabeth, Dunstone, Tucker Robert, Lower Veines, .Corn- Turner John Snell, Dowland ~arton, Yealmpton, Plymouth worthy, Totnes Dolton R.S.O Vanstone Mrs. Elizabeth, Huddisfprd, Tucker ::lamuel,Mariansleigh,Sth.Moltn Turner John, Halsbury, Burrington, Woolfardisworthy West, Bideford Tucker Saml. Wiggaton,Ottery St. Mary Chulmleigh Vanstone George, Lower Rosedown, Tucker Samuel, Woolfardisworthy, Turner John, Pinhoe, Exeter Hartland, Bideford Morchard Bishop R.S.O Turner John, Pitworthy, Pancrasweek, Vanstone G.Natcott, Hartland, Bideford TuckerT.Druxton,Werrington,Launcstn Holsworthy Vanstone James, Bowls bridge~ North Tucker T.Leigh,Morchard Bishop R.S.O Turner Mark, Winscott, St. Giles-in-the- Petherwin, Eglos.kerry R.S.O Tucker Thomas, Ley, South Molton Wood, Great Torrington Vanstone James, Kennaland, Bradford, TuckerT.Nth.Buckland,BrauntonR.S.O Turner Mrs. Matilda, Marsh green, Brandis Corner R.S.O Tucker T. Slade,Morchard BishopR.S.O Rockbeare, Exeter Vanstone J.Seckington,Hartlnd.Bideford Tucker Thos.Sth.Dean,Dean,Ilfracombe Turner Matthew, Scruel Barton, South- Vanstone James, Stowford, Langtree, 'fuckerW.Lane end,l\Iorchrd.Bshp.RSO leigh, Axminster Torrington Tucker William,Apridge, Doddiscombs- Turner Nicholas, Lower Uppercot, Vanstone John, Little Ladford, Sheb- leigh, Exeter Leusden, Ashburton R.S.O bear, Highampton R.S.O Tucker William, Barnacott, Stoke Turner William, Chelpham Barton, Vanstone Loammi, Broadwood-Kelly, Rivers, Barnstaple Bratton Fleming, Barnstaple Winkleigh R.S.O Tucker William (exors.of), Broomsmed, Turner William, Higher North Combe, Vanstone Samuel, Caute, Shebbear, Lapford, Morchard Bishop R.S.O Templeton, Tiverton .
    [Show full text]
  • The Chantry, Kingsteignton, Devon, TQ12 3BA Guide Price £585,000
    The Chantry, Kingsteignton, Devon, TQ12 3BA Guide Price £585,000 . Reception Hall with Cupola . 2 Shower Rooms & Pool Room . Superb octagonal Dining Road . Library/6th Bedroom . Impressive Oval Sitting Room . Garage, ample Parking, Workshop . Comprehensively fitted Kitchen . Refurbished Studio . 5 Themed Ensuite Bedrooms . Heated 20' Plunge Pool 50 Fore Street, Bovey Tracey, Devon, TQ13 9AE Tel: 01626 818094 [email protected] The Chantry is currently set up for a successful 5 Star Access to the property is through double wrought iron holiday letting, but would easily convert back to an exciting gates leading into a sweeping circular driveway which has beautifully proportioned family home with double garage parking for 10 plus vehicles. From here there is access to and a self-contained studio and enclosed gardens. the main house, DOUBLE GARAGE with power and Described by the Georgian Group dedicated to preserving light connected with a door leading up to the buildings from this period as 'one of the very best examples of the cottage orne genre in the country'. Dating back to STUDIO – This self-contained area has been refurbished 1815, this beautiful Grade II Listed, quirky thatched to provide a comfortable living/kitchen area with a property forms the major part of the original vicarage and double ensuite bedroom. is the perfect location for a family holiday or for friends to get together. The gardens to the rear of the main property include a raised decked area which has an inset 20' x 10' heated The Grade II* listing reflects the many wonderful features plunge pool which is surrounded by a tall gothic style of historical and architectural importance of which the screen with inset gothic style windows.
    [Show full text]
  • Ringing Round Devon
    Ringing Round THE GUILD OF DEVONSHIRE RINGERS Devon Newsletter 112: December 2018 ‘to promote an environment in which ringing can flourish’. Last Sunday we witnessed what ‘flourish’ looks like – more of that, Guild Events please. Whilst it is impossible to thank all key individuals by name, I RINGING REMEMBERS would like to pay a special tribute to Vicki Chapman – Ringing Remembers Project Coordinator, Colin Chapman – Coordinator’s ‘roadie’, Alan Regin – Steward of the CCCBR Rolls of Honour, Andrew Hall – developer and administrator of the Ringing Remembers web platform, and Bruce and Eileen Butler – who linked thousands of enquirers to guilds, districts and towers. And there are so many others… My thanks go also to all those who have come to ringing through this route; may you continue to develop in skill and gain many happy years of fulfilment in your ringing. And to that widespread army of ringing teachers who have risen to the challenge of training so many enthusiastic learners – well done! Last Sunday was a day of reflection, a day of commemoration, a day of participation. Bellringers everywhere were able to say: ‘I was there – I remembered’. Christopher O’Mahony The badge issued to all new ringers who registered in time Photo by Lesley Oates Note from our Guild President I think all of our members deserve to be congratulated on the ‘WE REMEMBERED’ – A MESSAGE FROM THE fantastic number of towers in Devon which were heard ringing for PRESIDENT OF THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF the Armistice on Sunday. Much has been shared on social media CHURCH BELL RINGERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Whimple and Rockbeare Reference 19/1606/FUL Applicant
    Ward Whimple And Rockbeare Reference 19/1606/FUL Applicant Mr N Readfern (Whimbrel Homes Ltd) Location The Elms London Road Whimple Exeter EX5 2PH Proposal Construction of 3 bay garage with flat above RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Habitat Regulations Appropriate Assessment contained within the report be adopted; and, 2. The application be APPROVED subject to conditions. Crown Copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 100023746 Committee Date: 29th August 2019 Whimple And Target Date: Rockbeare 19/1606/FUL 18.09.2019 (Rockbeare) Applicant: Mr N Readfern (Whimbrel Homes Ltd) Location: The Elms London Road Proposal: Construction of 3 bay garage with flat above RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Habitat Regulations Appropriate Assessment contained within the report be adopted; and, 2. The application be APPROVED subject to conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application is before Members as it represents a departure from adopted policy. The proposal seeks to provide a flat above a garage block that has previously benefitted from planning permission. As the principle of development of the site has been found to be acceptable by a Planning Inspector in 2016, due to its close relationship of the site with Cranbrook, and with planning permission subsequently approved for the garage block as part of a development of 4 dwellings on the site, the principle of a building in this location and residential use of the site has been established and is acceptable. The access is suitable to serve the additional dwelling and adequate car parking is provided. Whilst the proposal will increase the ridge height of the garage slightly, and introduce a couple of dormer windows and gable ends to the front and rear elevations, the site is set back from the main road frontage and as such the design of the proposal is considered to be acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • South Devon , but There Is a General Idea That It May Be Said to Be Within a Line from Teignmouth to Modbury, Spreading Inward in an Irregular Sort of Way
    SO UT H D EVO N PAI NTED BY E H ANNAF O RD C . D ESC R IBED BY C H AS R R WE M . I . O , J . WI TH 2 4 F U LL- PAG E I LLU STRATI O NS I N C O LO U R L O N D O N ADAM AND CH ARLES BLACK 1 907 C ONTENTS I NTRO DU C TO RY TO R"UAY AND TO R B AY DARTMO U T H TEIGNMO U 'I‘ H N EWTO N A B B O T ToTNEs K INGSB RI D GE I ND E" LIST O F ILLU STRATIONS 1 S . Fore treet, Totnes F ACING 2 C . A Devonshire ottage 3 . Torquay 4 B abbacombe . , Torquay An i 5 . st s Cove , Torquay 6 C C . ompton astle 7 . Paignton 8 . Brixham Butterwalk 9 . The , Dartmouth 1 ’ 0. C Bayard s ove , Dartmouth 1 1 S . Fosse treet, Dartmouth 1 2 . Dittisham , on the Dart 1 3 . rt Kingswear, Da mouth 1 4 Shaldon , Teign mouth from 1 5 . Teignmouth and The Ness 1 6 . Dawlish 1 St ’ 7 . Leonard s Tower, Newton Abbot LI ST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Bradley Woods, Newton Abbot Berry Pomeroy Castle Salcombe Kingsbridge Salcombe Castle S Bolt Head, alcombe Brent S O U T H D E V O N INTRODU C TORY PER HAPS there is no rigorously defined region in cluded under the title of South Devon , but there is a general idea that it may be said to be within a line from Teignmouth to Modbury, spreading inward in an irregular sort of way .
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency South West Region
    ENVIRONMENT AGENCY SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 ANNUAL HYDROMETRIC REPORT Environment Agency Manley House, Kestrel Way Sowton Industrial Estate Exeter EX2 7LQ Tel 01392 444000 Fax 01392 444238 GTN 7-24-X 1000 Foreword The 1997 Hydrometric Report is the third document of its kind to be produced since the formation of the Environment Agency (South West Region) from the National Rivers Authority, Her Majesty Inspectorate of Pollution and Waste Regulation Authorities. The document is the fourth in a series of reports produced on an annua! basis when all available data for the year has been archived. The principal purpose of the report is to increase the awareness of the hydrometry within the South West Region through listing the current and historic hydrometric networks, key hydrometric staff contacts, what data is available and the reporting options available to users. If you have any comments regarding the content or format of this report then please direct these to the Regional Hydrometric Section at Exeter. A questionnaire is attached to collate your views on the annual hydrometric report. Your time in filling in the questionnaire is appreciated. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Contents Page number 1.1 Introduction.............................. .................................................... ........-................1 1.2 Hydrometric staff contacts.................................................................................. 2 1.3 South West Region hydrometric network overview......................................3 2.1 Hydrological summary: overview
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Schedule of Polling Places and Designated Polling Stations
    DRAFT APPENDIX C TEIGNBRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF POLLING DISTRICTS, DESIGNATED POLLING STATIONS AND NUMBER OF ELECTORS POLLING POLLING PLACE DESIGNATED POLLING NUMBER OF DISTRICT STATION(S) ALLOCATED ELECTORS CAA Station 1: 1366 Ashburton St Andrew’s Church Hall Ashburton Station 2: 1288 CAB Ashton Ashton Village Hall 149 Ashton CAC Bickington Bickington Village Hall 236 Bickington CAD Methodist Hall, Bovey Tracey 2254 Bovey Tracey Bovey Tracey Wickham Hall, Bovey Tracey 1839 CAE Bovey Tracey Bovey Tracey Heathfield Community Centre 1076 (Heathfield) CAF Bridford Bridford Village Hall 369 Bridford CAG Station1: 1073 Buckfastleigh Buckfastleigh Town Hall Buckfastleigh Station 2: 1067 CAH Buckfastleigh Buckfast South Park Community Centre 312 (Buckfast) CAI Buckland-in- Buckland-in-the-Moor Buckland-in-the-Moor Community Hall 88 the-Moor CAJ Christow Teign Valley Community Hall 631 Christow CAK Station 1: 1544 Chudleigh Woodway Room, Chudeigh Town Hall Chudleigh Station 2: 1524 CAL Doddiscombs Doddiscombsleigh Doddiscombsleigh Primary School 201 leigh CAM Dunchideock Dunchideock Village Hall 197 Dunchideock CAN Dunsford Dunsford Village Hall 453 Dunsford DRAFT APPENDIX C CAO Station 1: 1397 Exminster Victory Hall, Exminster Exminster Station 2: 1439 CAP Hennock Hennock Hennock Village Hall 334 (Village) CAQ Hennock Chudleigh Knighton Chudleigh Knighton Village Hall 884 (Chudleigh Knighton) CAR Holcombe Holcombe Burnell Longdown Village Hall 405 Burnell CAS Ide Ide Memorial Hall 388 Ide CAT Ilsington Ilsington Village Hall 475 Ilsington
    [Show full text]