DOCSLIB.ORG

EBRD 9571 Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EBRD 9571 Project Document DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL EBRD and Global Environment Facility Promoting accelerated uptake of environmental technologies and promotion of best practices for improved water, chemicals and waste management in the Black Sea Basin Project Document 30 May 2019 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by the recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without the Bank's authorisation. Black Sea Basin: Project Document Table of Contents List of figures ......................................................................................................................................... ii List of tables........................................................................................................................................... ii Abbreviations and acronyms .............................................................................................................. iii Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... v 1 Context ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of the EBRD region ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Overview of the Black Sea Basin ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3 International Waters ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Chemicals and Waste .......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Baseline .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Baseline Scenario ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Consistency with National Priorities ............................................................................................... 14 2.3 Barriers .............................................................................................................................................. 15 3 Project design .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Project Alternative Scenario ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Project Objective and Outcomes ..................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Project Components and Outputs ................................................................................................... 21 3.4 Project Financing .............................................................................................................................. 28 3.5 Incrementality and Additionality .................................................................................................... 30 3.6 Global Environmental Benefits ........................................................................................................ 30 3.7 Innovativeness, Sustainability and Potential for Scaling-up ......................................................... 31 4 Rationale for the Bank’s involvement ....................................................................................... 33 4.1 Fit with the EBRD ............................................................................................................................. 33 4.2 Risks ................................................................................................................................................... 35 4.3 Socio-economic Benefits .................................................................................................................... 36 4.4 Gender ................................................................................................................................................ 37 5 Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................... 38 5.1 Project Management Structure ........................................................................................................ 38 5.2 Consultancies ..................................................................................................................................... 39 5.3 Stakeholder Engagement .................................................................................................................. 40 6 Monitoring and Reporting ......................................................................................................... 41 6.1 EBRD Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 41 6.2 GEF Monitoring and Reporting ...................................................................................................... 41 6.3 Monitoring and Evaluation Budget ................................................................................................. 42 Annex A: Project Results Framework .............................................................................................. 43 Annex B: EBRD procedures for approval of investments .............................................................. 46 Annex C: Pipeline investments and Global Environmental Benefits Analysis - CONFIDENTIAL .............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Annex D: Gender Analysis and Gender Action Plan ....................................................................... 49 Annex E: POPs and other waste sources, and mitigation and reduction measures ...................... 58 Annex F: Water pollution, and mitigation and reduction measures .............................................. 60 Annex G: Relevant on-going projects in participating Countries .................................................. 61 Annex H: Country Profiles ................................................................................................................ 64 Annex I: Stakeholder Engagement Plan ........................................................................................... 81 i Black Sea Basin: Project Document List of figures Figure 1. Black Sea Project target countries ........................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Black Sea Eutrophication Integrated Assessment Tool (BEAST) – water quality .................. 4 Figure 3. Main land based sources of Black Sea basin pollution (a) “hot spots”, (b) river run-off ........ 5 Figure 4. Model results of water quality from the three Black Sea regions: the North Black Sea, the Azov Sea and the South Black Sea ......................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5. Project overview .................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 6. EBRD’s Project implementation structure ............................................................................ 39 List of tables Table 1. Objectives and results of recent investments targeting nutrient and chemical pollution in the Black Sea basin region .......................................................................................................................... 10 Table 2. Summary of relevant national priorities.................................................................................. 14 Table 3. Barriers to investment in improved water, waste and chemicals technologies and management practices in target countries ............................................................................................. 16 Table 4. Summary of indicative pipeline, including description, relevance to Black Sea, funding sources and requirements, and potential GEBs ..................................................................................... 24 Table 5. Breakdown of project components and sources of financing ................................................. 29 Table 6. Summary of GEBs .................................................................................................................. 31 Table 7. EBRD country strategy objectives for the countries involved in the Project.......................... 33 Table 8. Risks, ratings and mitigations ................................................................................................. 35 Table 9. Indicative monitoring and evaluation plan.............................................................................. 42 ii Black Sea Basin: Project Document Abbreviations and acronyms APMR Annual Portfolio Monitoring Report BAT Best Available Techniques BEAST Black Sea Eutrophication Integrated Assessment Tool BOD Biological Oxygen Demand BREFs Best Available Techniques Reference Documents BSC Black Sea Commission BSIMAP Black Sea Integrated monitoring and Assessment Programme BS SAPIR Strategic Action Plan for Environmental Protection and Rehabilitation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Anthropogenic Transformation of the Danube-Black Sea System SUBJECT AREAS: Liviu Giosan1, Marco J
    Early Anthropogenic Transformation of the Danube-Black Sea System SUBJECT AREAS: Liviu Giosan1, Marco J. L. Coolen2, Jed O. Kaplan3, Stefan Constantinescu4, Florin Filip4, EARTH SCIENCES Mariana Filipova-Marinova5, Albert J. Kettner6 & Nick Thom7 CLIMATE CHANGE OCEANOGRAPHY 1Geology & Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA, 2Marine Chemistry & BIODIVERSITY Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA, 3ARVE Group, Ecole Polytechnique Fe´de´rale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Department of Geography, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, 70709, Romania, 5Museum of Natural History, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria, 6Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Received Boulder, CO 80309-0450, USA, 7Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. 22 March 2012 Accepted Over the last century humans have altered the export of fluvial materials leading to significant changes in 1 August 2012 morphology, chemistry, and biology of the coastal ocean. Here we present sedimentary, paleoenvironmental Published and paleogenetic evidence to show that the Black Sea, a nearly enclosed marine basin, was affected by land use long before the changes of the Industrial Era. Although watershed hydroclimate was spatially and 30 August 2012 temporally variable over the last ,3000 years, surface salinity dropped systematically in the Black Sea. Sediment loads delivered by Danube River, the main tributary of the Black Sea, significantly increased as land use intensified in the last two millennia, which led to a rapid expansion of its delta. Lastly, proliferation Correspondence and of diatoms and dinoflagellates over the last five to six centuries, when intensive deforestation occurred in requests for materials Eastern Europe, points to an anthropogenic pulse of river-borne nutrients that radically transformed the should be addressed to food web structure in the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus Inputs to the Black Sea in 1970–2050
    Reg Environ Change (2013) 13:179–192 DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0328-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the Black Sea in 1970–2050 Maryna Strokal • Carolien Kroeze Received: 18 June 2011 / Accepted: 13 June 2012 / Published online: 29 June 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus Introduction (P) inputs are major causes of eutrophication in the coastal waters of the Black Sea. The objective of this study is to Eutrophication has been a serious problem in the Black Sea analyze the past and future trends in river export of nitrogen since the 1970s (Borysova et al. 2005; Tokarev and Shul- and phosphorus to the coastal waters of the Black Sea and to man 2007; McGinley 2008; Zaitsev and Mamaev 1997; assess the associated potential for coastal eutrophication. Yunev et al. 2007; BSC 2008, 2009). This eutrophication is The Global NEWS-2 (Nutrient Export from WaterSheds) caused by increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs model was used for this purpose. Currently, most eutro- to the sea, as a result of human activities on the land. In phication occurs in the North Black Sea and the Azov Sea. particular, the rapid growth of fertilizer and manure In the future, however, this may change. We analyzed applications in agriculture contributed to this, as well as trends up to 2050 on the basis of the Millennium Ecosystem changes in land use and poor wastewater treatment (Bo- Assessment (MEA) scenarios. The results indicate that rysova et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Runoff to the Black Sea from the East European Plain During Last Glacial Maximum–Late Glacial Time
    Downloaded from specialpapers.gsapubs.org on September 18, 2012 The Geological Society of America Special Paper 473 2011 Surface runoff to the Black Sea from the East European Plain during Last Glacial Maximum–Late Glacial time Aleksey Yu. Sidorchuk Andrey V. Panin Geographical Faculty, Moscow State University, Vorob’evy Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia Olga K. Borisova Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per., Moscow 119017, Russia ABSTRACT Hydromorphological and hydroclimatic methods were used to reconstruct the former surface runoff from the East European part of the Black Sea drainage basin. Data on the shape and dynamics of the last Fennoscandian ice sheet were used to cal- culate meltwater supply to the headwaters of the Dnieper River. The channel width and meander wavelength of well-preserved fragments of large paleochannels were measured at 51 locations in the Dnieper and Don River basins (East European Plain), which allowed reconstruction of the former surface runoff of the ancient rivers, as well as the total volume of fl ow into the Black Sea, using transform functions. Studies of the composition of fossil fl oras derived from radiocarbon-dated sediments of vari- ous origins and ages make it possible to locate their modern region analogues. These analogues provide climatic and hydrological indexes for the Late Pleniglacial and Late Glacial landscapes. Morphological, geological, geochronological, and palyno- logical studies show that the landscape, climatic, and hydrologic history of the region included:
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Environment Programme
    Annex 1 PROJECT BRIEF 1. IDENTIFIERS PROJECT NUMBER : PROJECT NAME: GEF Strategic Partnership on the Danube/Black Sea Basin, Element 1 - Regional (Bulgaria, Romania, Georgia, Russian Federation, Turkey, Ukraine): Control Of Eutrophication, Hazardous Substances And Related Measures For Rehabilitating The Black Sea Ecosystem: Phase 1 PROJECT DURATION: 2 Years (followed by 3 year Phase 2) IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: UNDP, in association with UNEP and the World Bank EXECUTING AGENCY: UNOPS REQUESTING COUNTRIES : Bulgaria, Romania, Georgia, Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine ELIGIBILITY: Eligible under para. 9(b) of GEF Instrument GEF FOCAL AREA: International Waters GEF PROGRAMMING OP#8: Waterbody-Based Operational Program FRAMEWORK SUMMARY The long-term objective of the project is to assist the beneficiary countries to take measures to reduce nutrient levels and other hazardous substances to such levels necessary to permit Black Sea ecosystems to recover to similar conditions as those observed in the 1960s. This will be achieved through a process of adaptive management in which agreed common targets are pursued throughout the 17 country Black Sea Basin. The present project will assist the coastal countries to meet the agreed first target (maintenance of nutrient loads at their 1997 levels) and to set the subsequent target using the best available scientific information coupled with benefit/cost studies and political pragmatism. The current project will also help to reduce fisheries pressure on sensitive habitats and contribute towards rational
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Effects of Eutrophication in the Black Sea
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF EUTROPHICATION IN THE BLACK SEA SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by Joint Ad-hoc Technical Working Group ICPDR - ICPBS DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF EUTROPHICATION IN THE BLACK SEA SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by Joint Ad-hoc Technical Working Group ICPDR - ICPBS Preface The Black Sea is regarded as a regional sea that has been most severely damaged as the result of human activity. Based upon comprehensive studies by scientists, in 1996, Ministers of the Environment from Black Sea countries recognised, amongst other things, that "The Black Sea ecosystems continues to be threatened by inputs of certain pollutants, notably nutrients. Nutrients enter the Black Sea from land based sources, and in particular through rivers The Danube River accounts for well over half of the nutrient input of the Black Sea. Eutrophication is a phenomenon which occurs over wide areas of the Black Sea and should be a concern to the countries of the Black Sea Basin." Further more, the Ministers agreed that "A Black Sea Basin Wide Strategy, negotiated wit all states located in the Black Sea Basin should be developed to address the eutrophication problem in the Black Sea. The objective of the Strategy should be to negotiate a progressive series of stepwise reductions of nutrient loads, until agreed Black Sea water quality objectives are met." In order to facilitate the development of such a strategy, it is necessary to have a clear common understanding of the nature of the problem, its causes and the options available for solving it.
    [Show full text]
  • Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY for SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER in the WESTERN BALKANS
    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Background Report No. 2 Hydrology, integrated water resources management and climate change Final Draft 4 November 2017 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor t has been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client ’) in connection wit h the captioned project . It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed t erm s of reliance wit h us (the ‘Recipient ( s)’) may rely on the content, inf ormation or any views expr essed in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Management in the Danube and Black Sea Region - Policy and Implementation
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Umwelt - Schriftenreihe für Ökologie und Ethologie Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 32 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zavadsky Ivan Artikel/Article: Water Quality Management in the Danube and Black Sea Region - Policy and Implementation. 44-72 © Verein für Ökologie und Umweltforschung; download unter www.zobodat.at Water Quality Management in the Danube and Black Sea Region - Policy and Implementation Wasserqualitatsmanagement in der Region Donau - Schwarzes Meer: Strategien und Umsetzung Ivan Zavadsky 1 Danube - Black Sea Basin - the most international basin The Black Sea is the world’s most isolated sea - connected to the Oceans via the Mediterranean Sea through the Bosphorus, Dardanelle and Gibraltar straits and with the Sea of Azov in the northeast through the Kerch Strait. The catchment area is 6 times greater than the surface area of the Black Sea. The Black Sea is up to 2212 metres deep and receives the drainage from a 2 mil­ lion square kilometre basin. Every year, about 350 cubic kilometres of river water pour into the Black Sea from an area covering almost a third of continental Europe and including significant areas of seventeen countries: Austria, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia Czech Republic, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Serbia und Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine. Europe’s second, third ano fourth rivers: the Danube, Dnipro (Dnipro) and Don via the Sea of Azov, togethe: with Rioni, Kodori, Inguri Chorokh, Kizilirmak, Yeshihrmak, Sakarya, Southern Bu| and Dnister, all flow into the Black Sea. Its only connection to other marine water bodies is through the winding Istan bul (Bosphorus) Straits, a 35 km natural channel, as little as 40 metres dee in places.
    [Show full text]
  • Danube - Black Sea Basin Strategic Partnership
    October 2005 DANUBE - BLACK SEA BASIN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP Interim Progress Report – Annex 1 W o r k i n g f o r t h e D a n u b e a n d B l a c k S e a Interim Progress Report on the Danube – Black Sea Strategic Partnership page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. Introduction to Danube/Black Sea basin Strategic Partnership Interim Report – annex 1 ................................................................................................................... 9 2. Overall Progress on the Strategic Partnership: Objectives vs. Indicators (Process and Stress Reduction) ................................................................................. 12 2.1. Objective 1 ............................................................................................................ 13 2.1.1. Objective 1: Progress Summary ..................................................................... 13 2.1.2. Objective 1: Progress ................................................................................... 14 2.2 Objective 2 ............................................................................................................ 16 2.2.1. Objective 2: Progress Summary ..................................................................... 16 2.2.2. Objective 2: Progress ................................................................................... 17 2.3. Objective 3 ............................................................................................................ 31 2.3.1. Objective 3: Progress Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Water Discharges Into the Bulgarian Black Sea
    International Symposium on Outfall Systems, May 15-18, 2011, Mar del Plata, Argentina Water Discharges into the Bulgarian Black Sea S. I. Dineva* *Institute of Fishing Resources, 4 Primorski Blvd., P.O. Box 72, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract In respect to marine pollution, the Black Sea is one of the world's most vulnerable areas as it refers to the internal continental seas, with limited contact to the World Ocean. Human activity has affected the Black Sea environment and its shores. The survey highlights the factors and issues related to pollution of the Bulgarian Black Sea by various discharges, and address it since if not be resolved, this marine environmental problem can become security threat. The aim is to analyze the current environmental setting related to discharges into the Bulgarian Black Sea and to focus on the most critical problems as to pollution. The survey ranges over a large number of discharges by rivers, municipal and industrial sources, agriculture, etc., linking to pollution of the Bulgarian Black Sea. Current environmental state is due to ineffectiveness in discharge control, management and necessary infrastructure. Keywords Discharges, pollution, water environment impacts, the Black Sea INTRODUCTION Though almost enclosed, the Black Sea is deep (EC, 2011). The maximum depth in the central part is 2210 m. With regard to oxygen, the water is an extremely vulnerable environment. For the past thirty years, the major rivers that flow into the Black Sea have been dumping massive quantities of industrial waste into it, resulting in considerable damage to the ecosystem.The Black Sea is still the most popular tourist destination for people in nearby countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 51. Black Sea: Geological Setting and Recent Deposits Distribution from Seismic Reflection Data
    51. BLACK SEA: GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND RECENT DEPOSITS DISTRIBUTION FROM SEISMIC REFLECTION DATA J. Letouzey, R. Gonnard, and L. Montadert, Institute Français du Pétrole, Reuil-Malmaison, France K. Kristchev, Académie Bulgare des Sciences, Institut Géologique "Strasimir Dimitrov," Sofia, Bulgaria and A. Dorkel, Societé Nationale Elf-Aquitaine, Pau, France ABSTRACT The origin of the Black Sea is discussed in the framework of the evolution of the Mediterranean Alpine area since the beginning of the Mesozoic. The Black Sea is considered to be a marginal basin formed between Lias to Upper Cretaceous times, behind the Pontides Range relative to the consumption of the Tethys. Land geological data and multichannel seismic reflection profiles show that later compressional movements occurred at the northeastern and southern margin of the Black Sea depression. In the abyssal plain, basement reliefs are buried by a thick horizontal sequence of mainly post-Eocene sediments. Mud diapiric phenomena of deep layers, related to undercompaction, and covered by rapidly deposited thick sediments, are observed southeast of Crimea. It appears that, during Pliocene-Quaternary times, sedimentation and subsidence strongly increased. Sedimentation was controlled by fans related to the main deltas. Correlations of DSDP holes with seismic reflection profiles allow better interpretation of the sedimentation pattern in the Black Sea. INTRODUCTION structural zones (Figure 1). To the north the Ukranian Shield plunges southward beneath Mesozoic and In recent years, the numerous oceanographic surveys Cenozoic formations that form the Scythian Platform made in the different Mediterranean basins have led to and thick-sectioned Karkinit and Indol Kuban basins. great progress in our understanding of these basins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danube River Basin District
    / / / / a n ï a r k U / /// ija ven Slo /// o / sk n e v o l S / / / / a r o G a n r C i a j i b r S / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / g á z s r ro ya ag M The /// a / blik repu Danube River Ceská / Hrvatska //// osna i Hercegovina //// Ba˘lgarija /// / B /// Basin District h ic e River basin characteristics, impact of human activities and economic analysis required under Article 5, Annex II randr Annex III, and inventory of protected areas required under Article 6, Annex IV of the EU Water Framework Directivee (2000/60/EC) t s Part A – Basin-wide overviewÖ / / Short: “Danube Basin Analysis (WFD Roof Report 2004)” / / d n a l h c s t u e D / / / / The complete report consists of Part A: Basin-wide overview, and Part B: Detailed analysis of the Danube river basin countries 18 March 2005, Reporting deadline: 22 March 2005 Prepared by International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) in cooperation with the countries of the Danube River Basin District. The Contracting Parties to the Danube River Protection Convention endorsed this report at the 7th Ordinary Meeting of the ICPDR on December 13-14, 2004. The final version of the report was approved 18 March 2005. Overall coordination and editing by Dr. Ursula Schmedtje, Technical Expert for River Basin Management at the ICPDR Secretariat, under the guidance of the River Basin Management Expert Group. ICPDR Document IC/084, 18 March 2005 International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River Vienna International Centre D0412 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Basin ENI CBC 2014-2020 DRAFT 4 July 2014
    Black Sea Basin ENI CBC 2014-2020 DRAFT 4 July 2014 Prepared by the ENI CBC: Support to Programmes A project funded by the EU and implemented by Aets and Particip Table of Contents Black Sea Basin ENI CBC 2014-2020 ................................................................................ 1 ◦ Overall strategic framework ......................................................................................... 1 EU strategy for ENI CBC ................................................................................................................. 1 EU strategic framework for the Black Sea Basin ................................................................................. 2 Other relevant EU policies and initiatives........................................................................................... 3 ◦ Black Sea Basin strategic analyses and consultations ..................................................... 5 Socio-economic and SWOT analysis ................................................................................................. 5 Past experience analysis .................................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholders consultations ................................................................................................................ 7 Consistency with other EU programmes ............................................................................................ 8 Summary of strategy identification .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]