Advances in & Theory, 2018, 8, 1-10 http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt ISSN Online: 2165-3348 ISSN Print: 2165-333X

Quasi-Rational Canonical Forms of a Matrix over a Number

Zhudeng Wang*, Qing Wang, Nan Qin

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China

How to cite this paper: Wang, Z.D., Wang, Abstract Q. and Qin, N. (2018) Quasi-Rational Ca- nonical Forms of a Matrix over a Number A matrix is similar to Jordan canonical form over the complex field and the Field. Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix rational canonical form over a number field, respectively. In this paper, we fur- Theory, 8, 1-10. ther study the rational canonical form of a matrix over any number field. We https://doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 firstly discuss the elementary divisors of a matrix over a number field. Then, we

Received: October 28, 2017 give the quasi-rational canonical forms of a matrix by combining Jordan and Accepted: January 7, 2018 the rational canonical forms. Finally, we show that a matrix is similar to its Published: January 10, 2018 quasi-rational canonical forms over a number field.

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Keywords Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Matrix, Jordan Canonical Form, Rational Canonical Form, Commons Attribution International Quasi-Rational Canonical Form License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Open Access

1. Introduction

A matrix is similar to Jordan canonical form over the complex field and the ra- tional canonical form over a number field, respectively. Thus, Jordan and the ra- tional canonical forms of a matrix over the complex field are similar. Recently, Radjabalipour [1] studied the symmetrization of the Jordan canoni- cal form, Abo et al. [2] and Barone et al. [3] discussed the relations between the eigenstructures and Jordan canonical form. Moreover, Li [4] discussed the prop- erty of the rational canonical form of a matrix, Liu [5] gave out a constructive proof of existence theorem for rational form, and Radjabalipour [6] investigated the rational canonical form via the splitting field. In this paper, we further study the rational canonical form over any number field. We firstly discuss the concept of elementary divisors of a matrix over any num- ber field. Then, we give the quasi-rational canonical forms of a matrix by combin- ing Jordan and the rational canonical forms. Finally, we show that a matrix is sim- ilar to its quasi-rational canonical forms over any number field.

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 Jan. 10, 2018 1 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

2. Jordan and Rational Canonical Forms

Given a matrix A, it is an interesting work to find a simple matrix that is similar to A. We know that such a simple matrix is Jordan canonical form or the ration- al canonical form of A. Lemma 2.1. ([7], pp 244-247) An nn× matrix A is similar over the complex field to Jordan canonical form of its, such Jordan canonical form is unique up to a rearrangement of the order of its characteristic values, i.e., A is similar to the quasi- of order n

J1  J J = 2   Js where

ci 0 00 1c  00 i Ji = 01 00    00 1ci mmii×

is called an elementary Jordan matrix with characteristic value ci , is=1, 2, ,

and mm12+ ++ ms = n. nn−1 Definition 2.1. For a non-scalar monic daa(λλ) = +1 λ ++ n over a number field P, the nn× matrix

00 0 −an 10 0−a n−1 B = 01 0−an−2     00 1 −a1 is called the or of the monic polynomial d (λ ) . A , or λ-matrix, is a rectangular matrix A(λ ) whose ele- ments are in λ kk k−−11 k 0 A(λ) =( aij ( λ)) =( aaij λλ + ij ++ aij ) .

Here k is the largest of the degrees of the polynomial aij (λ ) . Two polynomial matrices A(λ ) and B(λ ) are called equivalent if one of them can be obtained from the other by means of some elementary operations. An arbitrary rectangular polynomial matrix is equivalent to a canonical ma- trix

a1 (λ ) 0 00  λ 0a2 ( )  00   

λ 00as ( ) 0     00 0 0

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 2 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

where the polynomials aa12(λλ),( ) ,, as ( λ) are not identically equal to zero and each is divisible by the preceding one. Let A(λ ) be a polynomial matrix of r, i.e., the matrix has minors of order r not identically equal to zero, but all the minors of order greater than r are

identically equal to zero in λ. We denote by D j (λ ) the greatest common divi- sor of all the minors of order j in Aj(λ ) ( =1, 2, , r) . It is easy to see that in the series

DD12(λλ),( ) ,, Dr ( λ)

each polynomial is divisible by the preceding one (see [8], pp 139-140). An easy verification shows immediately that the elementary operations change

neither the rank of A(λ ) nor the polynomials DD12(λλ),( ) ,, Dr ( λ) . Thus, rs= , the corresponding quotients will be denoted by

DD2 (λλ) r ( ) d1(λ) = Dd 12( λλ),( ) = ,, dr (λ) = DD11(λλ) r− ( )

is invariant under elementary operations and

d1(λ) = ad 12( λλ),( ) = a 2( λ),, drr( λ) = a( λ) .

The polynomials dd12(λλ),( ) ,, dr ( λ) are called the invariant polynomials of the λ-matrix A(λ ) .

Definition 2.2. ([8], pp 144-145) Let Aa= ( ij ) be an nn× matrix. We form its characteristic matrix

λ −−aa11 12  − a1n  −−aaλ  − a λEA−=21 22 2n .    −−aan12n  λ − ann The characteristic matrix is a λ -matrix of rank n. Its invariant polynomials

DD2 (λλ) n ( ) d1(λ) = Dd 12( λλ),( ) = ,, dn (λ) = DD11(λλ) n− ( )

are called the invariant polynomials of the matrix A. It is easy to see that the invariant polynomials of the companion matrix B of the monic polynomial d (λ ) are 1, , 1, d (λ ) . Definition 2.3. The following quasi-diagonal matrix

B1  B C = 2   Bs

is called the direct sum of the companion matrices Bi of non-scalar monic polyno-

mials dd12(λλ),( ) ,, ds ( λ) such that di+1 (λ ) divides di (λ ) for is=1, , − 1 and said to be in rational canonical form. The invariant polynomials of the rational canonical form matrix B in Defini- tion 2.3 are

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 3 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

1, , 1,dd12(λλ) ,( ) , , ds ( λ) .

Lemma 2.2. ([7], pp 238-239, Theorem 5) An nn× matrix A is similar over a number field P to one and only one matrix which is in rational canonical form, i.e., A is similar to the quasi-diagonal matrix

B1  B C = 2   Bs

where BB12,,, Bs are the companion matrices of the non-scalar invariant

polynomials dd12(λλ),( ) ,, ds ( λ) of matrix A.

3. The Elementary Divisors of a Matrix over a Number Field

Let P be a number field. Then a non-scalar monic polynomial in Px[ ] can be fac- tored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials in Px[ ] in one and, except for order, only one way. In the factorization of a given non-scalar monic polynomial fx( ) , some of the monic irreducible factors may be repeated. If

px12( ), px( ) ,, pxs ( )

are the distinct monic irreducible polynomials occurring in this factorization of fx( ) , then

rr12 rs fx( ) = p12( x) ⋅ p( x) ps ( x)

the exponent ri being the number of times the irreducible polynomial pxi ( ) oc- curs in the factorization. This decomposition is also clearly unique, and is called the primary decomposition of fx( ) . Theorem 3.1. If B is the companion matrix of the monic polynomial

nn−1 paa(λλ) = +1 λ ++ n B  EB1n Cc= = ( ij )  rn× rn  EB1n

where 0 01  0 00 E =  1n    0 00nn×

i.e.,

ccnn++1,= 2 n 1,2 n = = c(rn−+11,1) ( rn −) =1

then the invariant polynomials of C are 1, 1, , pr (λ ) .

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 4 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

Proof. Let λEB− −−λ E1n EB C(λλ) = EC −= =(cij (λ)) .  rn× rn  −−E1n λ EB

Then cc21(λλ) = 32 ( ) = = crn, rn− 1 ( λ) = −1 and a of order rn −1

cc21 (λλ) 22 ( )  c2,rn− 1 ( λ)

cc31 (λλ) 32 ( )  c3,rn− 1 ( λ) = ±1.  

ccrn,1 (λλ) rn,2 ( )  crn, rn− 1 ( λ)

Thus,

D11(λ) = = Drn− ( λ) =1, Drn ( λλ) = EC − .

By Laplace Theorem, we have that

r r Drn (λλ) = EC −= λ EB − = p( λ) .

Therefore, the invariant polynomials of C are 1, 1, , pr (λ ) .

The theorem is proved. The matrix C is called the rational block of pr (λ ) and the characteristic polynomial of C is precisely the last invariant polynomial pr (λ ) of C. We decompose the invariant polynomials

dd12(λλ),( ) ,, dr ( λ)

of the λ-matrix A(λ ) into irreducible factors over the number field P

kk11 12 k1s d1(λ) = pp 12( λλ) ( ) ps ( λ), d(λ) = ppkk21 ( λλ) 22 ( ) pk2s ( λ), 2 12 s 

kkrr12 krs drs(λ) = pp12( λλ) ( ) p( λ).

Here, pp12(λλ),( ) ,, ps ( λ) are all the distinct irreducible polynomials

over P (and with highest coefficient 1) that occur in dd12(λλ),( ) ,, dr ( λ) and

k12j≤ k j ≤≤ kjrj , = 1, , s.

All the power among

kk11 12 krs pp12(λλ),( ) ,, ps ( λ)

as far as they are distinct from 1, are called the elementary divisors of the λ-matrix A(λ ) in the number field P. Theorem 3.2. Assume that

kk12 kS d(λ) = pp12( λλ) ( ) pS ( λ)

is a polynomial of degree n, where

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 5 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

pp12(λλ),( ) ,, ps ( λ)

are the distinct monic irreducible polynomials and kk12,,, ks are all positive

integers. If CC12,,, Cs are, respectively, the rational blocks of

kk12 kS pp12(λλ),( ) ,, pS ( λ) then the invariant polynomials of the quasi-diagonal matrix

C1  C F = 2   Cs are 1, , 1, d (λ ) . Proof. It is easy to see that

λEC− 1  λEC− λEF−=2   λEC− s

ki and the invariant polynomials of λECi−=i ( 1, 2, , s) is 1, , 1, pi (λ ) . Thus,

by elementary operations of λ-matrices, λEC− i can be transformed into the ca- nonical form (see [8], pp 140-141) 1 1 C (λ ) =  i  ki pi (λ ) and λEF− be further transformed into 1   pk1 (λ ) 1 F (λ ) =  . 1   ks ps (λ ) For λ-matrix F (λ ) , we have that

Dn−1 (λ )

kk21ks kk31 ssk1k− = ( p2(λλλλλλ) ps( ), pp13( ) ( ) p ss( ),, p1( ) p− 1( λ)) =1

kk12 ks Dns(λ) = pp12( λλ) ( ) p( λλ) = d( ) . Thus,

D11(λ) = = Dnn− ( λ) =1, Dd( λλ) = ( ) and the invariant polynomials of F is

D(λ) DD− ( λλ) ( ) 1,21= 1, ,nn= 1, = d (λ ) . D1(λ) DDnn−− 21( λλ) ( ) The theorem is proved.

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 6 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

4. Quasi-Rational Form of a Matrix

By combining Jordan canonical form over the complex field and the rational ca- nonical forms over a number field and using the rational blocks of pr (λ ) , we give the quasi-rational canonical forms of a matrix over a number field. Theorem 4.1. If the invariant polynomials of a matrix A over a number field

P are 1, , 1,dd1 (λλ) , , s ( ) , FF12,,, Fs are the corresponding matrices of

the non-scalar invariant polynomials dd1 (λλ),, s ( ) in Theorem 3.2, then ma- trix A is similar over the number field P to the quasi-diagonal matrix

F1  F G = 2 .   Fs Proof. It is easy to verify that

λEF− 1  λEF− λEG−=2   λEF− s

and the invariant polynomials of λE−= Fii ( 1, 2, , s) are 1, , 1, di (λ ) . Thus,

by elementary operations of λ-matrices, λEF− i can be transformed into the ca- nonical form 1  1 F (λ ) =  i   di (λ )

and λEG− be further transformed into 1   d (λ ) 1 G (λ ) =  . 1    ds (λ )

By interchanging rows or columns of G (λ ) , G (λ ) can be transformed into 1   1   . d (λ ) 1   ds (λ )

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 7 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

Thus, λEG− and λEA− have same canonical forms, i.e., λEG− and λEA− are equivalent. Therefore, A and G are similar. The theorem is proved. The quasi-diagonal matrix G in Theorem 4.1 is called the quasi-rational ca- nonical form of matrix A.

Noting that Fii ( =1, 2, , s) in Theorem 4.1 is the direct sum of the rational blocks of some elementary divisors of matrix A, we see that these little block matrices appearing in the quasi-rational canonical form of A are precisely the rational blocks of all elementary divisors of A. Thus, if we find all elementary di- visors

kk12 km pp12(λλ),( ) ,, pm ( λ)

of A and the corresponding rational blocks FF12,,, Fm , then

λEF− 1  λEF− 2   λEF− m is equivalent to 1   pk1 (λ ) 1 F (λ ) =  . 1   km pm (λ ) By interchanging rows or columns, we know that F (λ ) is equivalent to 1   d (λ ) 1 G (λ ) =  1    ds (λ ) G (λ ) is equivalent to 1   1   . d (λ ) 1   ds (λ ) Thus,

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 8 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

λEF− 1  λEF− 2   λEF− m is equivalent to 1   1   . d (λ ) 1   ds (λ )

Therefore, A and the quasi-diagonal matrix

F1  F 2   Fs are similar. Similar to Jordan canonical forms of a matrix over the complex field, if we find all elementary divisors of a matrix over a number field and rational blocks of these elementary divisors, then the direct sum of these rational blocks is pre- cisely the quasi-rational canonical form of the matrix. Of course, the quasi-rational canonical form of a matrix is not unique. But, the quasi-rational canonical form is unique up to a rearrangement of the order of ra- tional blocks.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we further study the rational canonical form over any number field and give the quasi-rational canonical forms of a matrix by combining Jordan and the rational canonical forms. Unlike the companion matrices in the rational canonical form of a matrix A in [4] [5] [7], these little block matrices in the qua- si-rational canonical form of a matrix A are the rational blocks of elementary di- visors of A and not the companion matrices of the non-scalar invariant polyno- mials of A.

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Flagship Major Development of Jiangsu Higher Educa- tion Institution (PPZY2015C211) and College Students Practice Innovation Train- ing Program (201610324027Y).

References [1] Radjabalipour, M. (2017) A Symmetrization of the Jordan Canonical Form. Linear

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 9 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory

Z. D. Wang et al.

Algebra and Its Applications, 528, 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2016.05.027 [2] Abo, H., Eklund, D., Kahle, T. and Peterson. C. (2016) Eigenschemes and the Jor- dan Canonical Form. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 496, 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.12.030 [3] Barone, M., Lima, J.B. and Campello de Souza, R.M. (2016) The Eigenstructure and Jordan Form of the Fourier Transform over Fields of Characteristic 2 and a Genera- lized Vandermonde-Type Formula. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 494, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.12.021 [4] Li, S.G. (2015) The Study on the Property of Matrix Rational Canonical Form and Its Application. College Mathematics, 31, 76-83. (In Chinese) [5] Liu, X.Z. (2006) A Constructive Proof of Existence Theorem for Rational Form. College Mathematics, 22, 125-128. (In Chinese) [6] Radjabalipour, M. (2013) The Rational Canonical Form via the Splitting Field. Li- near Algebra and Its Applications, 439, 2250-2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2013.07.018 [7] Hoffman, K. and Kunze, R. (1971) Linear Algebra. 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. [8] Gantmacher, F.R. (1960) The Theory of Matrices. AMS Chelsea Publishing, New York.

DOI: 10.4236/alamt.2018.81001 10 Advances in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory