DOCSLIB.ORG

Thompson Sub-Machine Gun Philip B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thompson Sub-Machine Gun Philip B Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 23 Article 17 Issue 6 March--April Spring 1933 Thompson Sub-Machine Gun Philip B. Sharpe Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Philip B. Sharpe, Thompson Sub-Machine Gun, 23 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 1098 (1932-1933) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1098 PHILIP B. SHARPE his parole was revoked and he was returned to the penitentiary to complete his sentence. 8 One witness testifying in this investigation cited a large number of typical examples of the effect of Marihuana of which the following is the outstanding case. A Mexican, under the influence, while going beneath a railroad viaduct imagined that he saw approaching him, at great speed, a rider on an enormous horse. Dodging behind a column for protection, when he looked out again, he realized that what he had seen was an old woman pulling a small wagon. Going home, despite the fact that his wife had that day given birth to a child, he compelled her to get out of bed and prepare his dinner. Still suffering from the characteristic hallucinations, as she was peeling an onion, he imagined that she was preparing to attack him, and seizing a club he hit her in the head with such force that she was knocked unconscious. While this is only one example, it is typical of conditions among habitual smokers. THE THOMPSON SUB-MACHINE GUN PHILIP B. SHARPE Editor's Note: Since the Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory of North- western University, the Director of which is Editor of the Police Science Sec- tion of this JOURNAL, came into being as a direct result of the so-called Valentine Day Massacre which occurred in Chicago on February 14, 1929, a crime note- worthy for its speed of execution and the number of victims involved, both of which were made possible through the employment of the so-called "sub- machine gun," it seems quite fitting that an article exhaustively describing this weapon should appear in the section which he edits. Mr. Sharpe, as a perusal of his paper will show, is quite familiar with the history of the Thomp- son gun from its inception over ten years ago up to the present time. Persons interested in informing themselves upon the mechanism, function, and uses of this weapon, will find his contribution a most welcome one. C. G. At the National Rifle Matches at Camp Perry, Ohio, back in August, 1920, there appeared a strange looking weapon. It was neither rifle nor shotgun; pistol nor revolver. It had two odd-looking pistol grips with finger grooves in the forward surfaces. It had no buttstock. The user held the weapon on his hip by firmly grasping the two grips-and squeezed the trigger. Then things began to happen. From the muzzle burst a sheet of flame containing a string of copper-jacketed pellets; from the breech THOMPSON SUB-MACHINE GUN 1U99 erupted a shower of shiny brass cases. Crowds gathered. Here was a deadly arm, capable of spraying the landscape with sudden death in the form of 230 grain .45 Colt Automatic pistol bullets. Figure L IDENTIFICATION OF COMPONENT PARTS, MODEL 21AC (Fig. I) (No Tools Necessary for This Dismounting) 1. Cutts Compensator. 18. Firing Pin Spring. 2. Front Sight (Dovetailed into Corn- 19. Hammer. pensator). 20. Hammer Pin. 3. Barrel. 21. Buffer Pilot. 4. Receiver. 22. Buffer. 5. Rear Sight (Lyman), leaf raised. 23. Recoil Spring. 6. Ejector (Not removed for photo). 24. Sear Spring. 7. Frame Latch and Spring. 25. Sear Lever. 8. Actuator. 26. Sear Lever Spring. 9. Lock. 27. Safety. 10. Bolt. 28. Rocker Pivot, or Fire Control 11. Pivot Plate. Lever. 12. Sear. 29. Trigger Spring. 13. Magazine Catch. 30. Trip. 14. Magazine Catch Spring. 31. Disconnector. 15. Frame with Grip Attached. 32. Disconnector Spring. 16. Extractor. 33. Rocker. 17. Firing Pin. 34. Trigger. "What. is it?' was the topmost question. "A machine gun? What's it for?" The designers let their friends into the secret. It was 'a new development-and when prepared for the market would be known as the Thompson Sub-Machine Gun-one of the fastest firing weapons ever devised! That same year the new gun was adopted by the New York Police. The first move in making the Sub-Machine Gun interna- tionally famous had started-a move which has steadily spread until, with the start of 1932, several hundred police departments in the United States and Canada are equipped with the weapon which has made history in law enforcement. The writer has been keenly interested in the Thompson gun ever since that initial showing at Perry. His interest has prompted the PHILIP B. SHARPE preparation of this compilation of historical and practical data on a much misunderstood firearm. The few Thompson guns which have fallen into the hands of law breakers are much more in a minority than law enforcement ex- ecutives believe. For nearly two years, it is safe to state, probably S E " Figure IL Thompson Sub-Machine Gun, Model 1921AC, fitted with Cutts Compensator, 20-shot clip magazine and detachable stock. Figure III. Thompson Sub-Machine Gun, (Navy model of 1928) fitted with Compensator, 50-shot drum magazine, sling strap, and detachable stock. not one of these guns has gone astray, due to an entirely new sales system which will be explained later. The original Thompson gun is the product of a mind well known in military circles-General John T. Thompson, U. S. A., retired. General Thompson served for many years in the Ordance Dept. of the Army, retiring in 1914. But even a retired war horse cannot be shoved into the background. When the World War broke out, and THOMPSON SUB-MACHINE GUN 1101 American arms makers, together with various machinery firms, under- took to fill contracts for small arms for sundry Allied nations, the government stepped in to supervise this work. General Thompson was appointed Director of Arsenals, and the task fell on his shoulders. The former Ordnance executive foresaw the entry of the United States into the affray, and his military experience clearly indicated that our two armories-Springfield and Rock Island Arsenal-could not be tooled up to handle properly the manufacture of the Model 1903 rifle in sufficient quantities to equip our large armies. So he carefully studied the foreign arms available. The Remington Arms Company, at its Chester, Pennsylvania, plant, was manufacturing huge quantities of British Enfield rifles for England. To General Thompson, this arm seemed to be the most practical. Hence, when War was declared, General Thompson hav- ing been recalled to service, supervised the retooling of the Reming- ton-Chester plant to manufacture this rifle chambered for the U. S. service cartridge. Thus the "Springfield-Enfield" or "U. S. Rifle, Model 1917," as it was officially known, sprang into existence to be added to the capacity outputs of our military small arms plants. That they served their purpose well, only to be abandoned with the coming of peace, is a matter of record. With the cessation of hostilities, General Thompson turned his genius in other directions. The recent war had impressed on him the necessity for a new weapon, rapid in its rate of fire, yet suf- ficiently portable to replace the present Mauser type service rifle. A military man with a background of experience realizes that any new equipment, to be adopted, must not only shoot, but must with- stand the test of time, weather, wear, and carelessness on the part of enlisted men. The self-loading or "automatic" rifle intrigued him, although none of the existing types of actions met his critical ap- proval. The Browning Automatic Rifle, model 1918, was a moderately successful arm, although its disadvantages were prominent. It was too heavy. The empty gun and magazine weighed fifteen pounds, fifteen ounces. With the loaded clip of 20 rounds of service ammunition, another pound was added. Furthermore, General Thompson be- lieved that a gas operated arm was not practical because of its neces- sarily complicated structure. Yet the many Brownings turned out of the Colt plant managed to give a successful account of themselves. Thompson, however, set forth to design a mechanical action hav- ing the following features: PHILIP B. SHARPE Simplicity Accessibility Positive action under all conditions Normally light weight High rate of controlled fire. He designed and manufactured at the Colt plant in Hartford, Conn., twenty new type rifles which were submitted to the Army for tests, along with a number of other makes, both in the standard .30/06 caliber and also chambered for a new cartridge, the Pedersen .276. Results of this test were never made public, and it is doubtful if an automatic or self-loading rifle will be adopted by our Army and Navy for some time to come. A number of years ago I had an opportunity to handle, but not dismount, the .30 Thompson rifle at Springfield Armory. The gun weighed but ten pounds, and despite its long receiver, balanced well. These rifles were built to hold five shots and fired a single shot for each complete pull and release of the trigger. Since that time, two other rifles equipped with twenty shot magazines have been manu- factured and submitted to the military authorities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress
    The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces June 8, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22888 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The M-4 carbine is the Army’s primary individual combat weapon for infantry units. While there have been concerns raised by some about the M-4’s reliability and lethality, some studies suggest that the M-4 is performing well and is viewed favorably by users. The Army is undertaking both the M4 Carbine Improvement Program and the Individual Carbine Competition, the former to identify ways to improve the current weapon, and the latter to conduct an open competition among small arms manufacturers for a follow-on weapon. An integrated product team comprising representatives from the Infantry Center; the Armament, Research, Development, and Engineering Center; the Program Executive Office Soldier; and each of the armed services will assess proposed improvements to the M4. The proposal for the industry-wide competition is currently before the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, and with the anticipated approval, solicitation for industry submissions could begin this fall. It is expected, however, that a selection for a follow-on weapon will not occur before FY2013, and that fielding of a new weapon would take an additional three to four years. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service The
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Country Report
    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Singapore Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Singapore and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: AR 15 (M16/M4) G HK MP5 G Browning M 2 G IGLA (SA-16 / SA-18) G Carl Gustav recoilless rifle G Lee-Enfield SMLE G Daewoo K1 / K2 G M203 grenade launcher G FN FAL G Remington 870P G FN Herstal FN MAG G RPG 7 G Sterling MP L2A3 FN High Power U G FN P90 G Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pistol Grip Power Tool Handle and Trigger Size Effects on Grip Exertions and Opera Tor Preference
    HUMAN FACTORS, 1993,35(3),551-569 Pistol Grip Power Tool Handle and Trigger Size Effects on Grip Exertions and Opera tor Preference SEOUNGYEON OH and ROBERT G. RADWIN,1 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Finger and palmar forces were measured during actual pneumatic nutrunner op- eration using a strain gauge dynamometer. Eighteen student subjects were as- signed to one of three categories based on hand length. Two triggers and four handle spans were presented randomly. Handle span affected maximal and sub- maximal grip force. As span increased from 4 cm to 7 cm, average peak finger force increased 24%, peak palmar force increased 22%, and average finger and palmar tool-holding forces increased 20%. When an extended trigger was used, average peak finger force decreased 9%, peak palmar force decreased 8%, finger tool- holding force decreased 65%, and palmar tool-holding force decreased 48%. Hand size affected grip strength (MVC),grip force, and exertion level (force/MVC). Hold- ing exertion level was maximum for large-handed subjects using a 4-cm handle and for small-handed subjects using a 7-cm handle. Subjective handle span pref- erence increased as hand size increased. A similar experiment was performed using 11 factory workers. INTRODUCTION was connected directly to the use of pneu- matic screwdrivers and nutrunners. There is Pneumatic hand-held power tools are also growing concern about designing and se- widely used in industry. Power tools reduce lecting power tools for preventing cumulative manual force requirements, shorten the time trauma disorders (CTDs). to accomplish tasks, and improve the quality Repetitive motion, forceful exertion, awk- of work.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. V. Corlett
    No. ______ In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ROBERT NASH, BRANDON KOCH, Petitioners, v. KEITH M. CORLETT, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of New York State Police, RICHARD J. MCNALLY, JR., in His official Capacity as Justice of the New York Supreme Court, Third Judicial District, and Licensing Officer for Rensselaer County, Respondents. ________________ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ________________ PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ________________ KEVIN M. NEYLAN, JR. PAUL D. CLEMENT KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Counsel of Record 601 Lexington Ave. ERIN E. MURPHY New York, NY 10022 KASDIN M. MITCHELL KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 389-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners December 17, 2020 QUESTION PRESENTED New York prohibits its ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying a handgun outside the home without a license, and it denies licenses to every citizen who fails to convince the state that he or she has “proper cause” to carry a firearm. In District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” 554 U.S. 570, 592 (2008), and in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court held that this right “is fully applicable to the States,” 561 U.S. 742, 750 (2010). For more than a decade since then, numerous courts of appeals have squarely divided on this critical question: whether the Second Amendment allows the government to deprive ordinary law-abiding citizens of the right to possess and carry a handgun outside the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Shotgun Shooting
    SHOTGUN SHOOTING STEM-Based BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MERIT BADGE SERIES SHOTGUN SHOOTING “Enhancing our youths’ competitive edge through merit badges” Requirements 1. Do the following: a. Explain why BB and pellet air guns must always be treated with the same respect as firearms. b. Describe how you would react if a friend visiting your home asked to see your or your family’s firearm(s). c. Explain the need for and use and types of eye and hearing protection. d. Explain the main points of the laws for owning and using guns in your community and state. e. Explain how hunting is related to the wise use of renewable wildlife resources. f. Successfully complete a state hunter education course, or obtain a copy of the hunting laws for your state, then do the following. (1) Explain the main points of hunting laws in your state and give any special laws on the use of guns and ammunition, and (2) List the kinds of wildlife that can be legally hunted in your state. g. Explain to your counselor the proper hygienic guidelines used in shooting. h. Identify and explain three shotgun sports. Identify places in your community where you could shoot these sports and explain how you can join or be a part of shooting sports activities. i. Give your counselor a list of sources that you could contact for information on firearms and their use. 4 SHOTGUN SHOOTING 2. Do ONE of the following options: OPTION A—SHOTGUN SHOOTING (Modern Shotshell Type) a. Identify the principal parts of a shotgun, action types, and how they function.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Brochure 9Th Edition.Indd
    9th Edition Own A Piece Of American History Thompson Submachine Gun General John T. Thompson, a graduate of West Point, began his research in 1915 for an automatic weapon to supply the American military. World War I was dragging on and casualties were mounting. Having served in the U.S. Army’s ordnance supplies and logistics, General Thompson understood that greater fi repower was needed to end the war. Thompson was driven to create a lightweight, fully automatic fi rearm that would be effective against the contemporary machine gun. His idea was “a one-man, hand held machine gun. A trench broom!” The fi rst shipment of Thompson prototypes arrived on the dock in New York for shipment to Europe on November 11, 1918 the day that the War ended. In 1919, Thompson directed Auto-Ordnance to modify the gun for nonmilitary use. The gun, classifi ed a “submachine gun” to denote a small, hand-held, fully automatic fi rearm chambered for pistol ammunition, was offi cially named the “Thompson submachine gun” to honor the man most responsible for its creation. With military and police sales low, Auto-Ordnance sold its submachine guns through every legal outlet it could. A Thompson submachine gun could be purchased either by mail order, or from the local hardware or sporting goods store. Trusted Companion for Troops It was, also, in the mid ‘20s that the Thompson submachine gun was adopted for service by an Dillinger’s Choice offi cial military branch of the government. The U.S. Coast Guard issued Thompsons to patrol While Auto-Ordnance was selling the Thompson submachine gun in the open market in the ‘20s, boats along the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Model 1897 Winchester a Complete Index to All Back Issues Article and Model 1897 Photos Dispatch Home by David V
    Official State Historical Center of the Texas Rangers law enforcement agency. The Following Article was Originally Published in the Texas Ranger Dispatch Magazine The Texas Ranger Dispatch was published by the Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum from 2000 to 2011. It has been superseded by this online archive of Texas Ranger history. Managing Editors Robert Nieman 2000-2009; (b.1947-d.2009) Byron A. Johnson 2009-2011 Publisher & Website Administrator Byron A. Johnson 2000-2011 Director, Texas Ranger Hall of Fame Technical Editor, Layout, and Design Pam S. Baird Funded in part by grants from the Texas Ranger Association Foundation Copyright 2017, Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum, Waco, TX. All rights reserved. Non-profit personal and educational use only; commercial reprinting, redistribution, reposting or charge-for- access is prohibited. For further information contact: Director, Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum, PO Box 2570, Waco TX 76702-2570. TEXAS RANGER DISPATCH Magazine Rangers Today Visitor Info History Research Center Hall of Fame Student Help Family History News Guns of the Texas Rangers: Click Here for The Model 1897 Winchester A Complete Index to All Back Issues Article and Model 1897 Photos Dispatch Home by David V. Stroud Visit our nonprofit Museum Store! Contact the Editor The development of a rapid-fire shotgun soon followed the development of rapid-fire rifles. Inventors such as Browning hoped that lever-action and slide- action (pump) action shotguns would prove as popular as Winchester rifles. Winchester Model 1887 Shotgun Courtesy Frank Ballinger Click Here for Bonnie & Clyde's Hideout In 1887, Winchester developed a lever-action shotgun loosely based on its rifle mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 CALIBER (12.7MM) HEAVY MACHINE GUN Reliable, Accurate, Effective
    M2HB .50 CALIBER (12.7MM) HEAVY MACHINE GUN Reliable, accurate, effective SPECIFICATIONS s General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems produc- Caliber .50 caliber / 12.7mm (NATO) es the .50 Caliber M2 Heavy Barrel (M2HB) machine gun, Weight (complete gun) 84 pounds (38.2 kg) a belt-fed, recoil operated, air-cooled, crew-served weapon Length 65.13 inches (1,654mm) capable of right or left-hand feed. The weapon’s lethality, durability and versatility make it ideal for offensive and Width 9 inches (230mm) defensive operations. Cyclic rate of fire 450-600 rounds per minute Maximum effective The M2 machine gun is one of the world’s most reliable, 2,000 yards (1,830m) range highly accurate and effective weapons. Maximum range 7,400 yards (6,766m) The M2HB fires a variety of NATO .50 Caliber ammuni- 3,050 feet per second Muzzle velocity (M33) (930 meters per second) tion to include: ball, tracer, armor-piercing, incendiary, and Barrel weight 26 pounds (11.79 kg) saboted light armor penetrator. The M2HB will deliver lethal Barrel construction cobalt-chromium alloy liner effects against multiple target types. The maximum effec- tive range of the M2HB is 1,830 meters for area targets and 1,500 meters for point targets. M2HB .50 CALIBER (12.7MM) HEAVY MACHINE GUN KEY FEATURES - Sustained automatic or single-shot firing - Durable, rugged design - Fires from the closed bolt for single-shot accuracy - Replaceable heavy barrel assembly - Simple design for ease of maintenance - Adjustable headspace and timing - Converts from left-hand to right-hand feed - Barrel life exceeds 10,000 rounds - Variety of mounting applications - Trigger block safety 11399 16th Court North - Suite 200 - St.
    [Show full text]
  • FIREARM SAFETY CERTIFICATE MANUAL for California Firearms Dealers and DOJ Certified Instructors
    F S C Firearm Safety Certificate M A N U A L for California Firearms Dealers and DOJ Certified Instructors California Department of Justice Division of Law Enforcement Bureau of Firearms June 2020 FIREARM SAFETY CERTIFICATE MANUAL For California Firearms Dealers and DOJ Certified Instructors TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 1 Firearms Dealer Responsibilities The Firearm Safety Certificate Law. .2 Verifying and Recording FSC Information on a DROS. 2 Firearm Safety Certificate Exemptions. 3 Safe Handling Demonstration Affidavits. 6 Firearm Safety Certificate Study Guide. 6 DOJ Certified Instructor Responsibilities The Firearm Safety Certificate Law. .7 Firearm Safety Certificate - Certified Instructor Cards. 7 Administering the FSC Test and Issuing FSCs. 7 Firearm Safety Certificate Fees. 7 The Firearm Safety Certificate Test Format. 7 Firearm Safety Certificate Test Guidelines. 8 Scoring the Firearm Safety Certificate Test. .8 Firearm Safety Certificate Issuance. 9 Firearm Safety Certificate Card Replacement. 9 Firearm Safety Certificate Record Keeping. 9 FSC Test Disqualification and Specific Acts of Collusion. 10 Safe Handling Demonstrations. 10 APPENDIX I Safe Handling Demonstration Steps (Conventional Firearms). 12 Semiautomatic Pistol. 12 Double-Action Revolver. 15 Single-Action Revolver. 17 Pump Action Long Gun. 19 Break-Top Long Gun. 20 Bolt Action Long Gun. 21 Lever Action Long Gun. 22 Semiautomatic Long Gun With a Detachable Magazine. 23 Semiautomatic Long Gun With a Fixed Magazine. 24 Safe Handling Demonstration Steps (Alternative Designs). 25 Semiautomatic Pistol With a Non-Locking Slide. 25 Semiautomatic Pistol With a Fixed Magazine. 26 Semiautomatic Pistol With a Magazine Operated Toggle Lock. 26 Semiautomatic Pistol With a Top-Feeding Magazine. 27 Semiautomatic Pistol With a Tip-Up Barrel.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar15 Semi—Automatic Instruction/ Safety Manual Caution
    AR15 SEMI—AUTOMATIC INSTRUCTION/ SAFETY MANUAL CAUTION: USE ONLY CLEAN, DRY, ORIGINAL, HIGH QUALITY COMMERCIALLY MANUFACTURED AMMUNITION IN GOOD CONDITON which is appropriate to the caliber of your firearm. We do not recommend the use of remanufactured or hand loaded ammunition because it may cause severe damage to yourself and/ or your rifle. Page 1 SECTION 1 PRECAUTIONS READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL THE FOLLOWING PRECAUTIONS BEFORE REMOVING THIS FIREARM FROM ITS PACKAGE. ! WARNING: IF THIS FIREARM IS CARELESSLY OR IMPROPERLY HANDLED, UNINTENTIONAL DISCHARGE COULD RESULT AND COULD CAUSE INJURY, DEATH, OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. CAUTION: PRIOR TO LOADING AND FIRING, CAREFULLY READ THIS INSTRUCTION MANUAL WHICH GIVES BASIC ADVICE ON THE PROPER HANDLING AND FUNCTIONING OF THIS RADICAL FIREARMS SYSTEM. However, your safety and the safety of others (including your family) depends on your mature compliance with that advice, and your adoption, development and constant employment of safe practices. If unfamiliar with firearms, seek further advice through safe handling courses run by your local gun clubs, NRA approved instructor, or similar qualified organizations. Page 2 NOTICE: Radical Firearms shall not be responsible for injury, death, or damage to property resulting from either intentional or accidental discharge of this firearm, or from its function when used for purposes or subjected to treatment for which it was not designed. Radical Firearms will not honor claims involving this firearm which result from careless or improper handling, unauthorized adjustment or parts replacement, corrosion, neglect, or the use of wrong caliber ammunition, or the use of ammunition other than original high quality commercially manufactured ammunition in good condition, or any combination thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Firearm Magazines and Magazine Prohibitions
    KOPEL 3/17/2015 11:41 AM THE HISTORY OF FIREARM MAGAZINES AND MAGAZINE PROHIBITIONS David B. Kopel* I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the prohibition of firearms magazines has become an important topic of law and policy debate. This article details the history of magazines and of magazine prohibition. The article then applies the historical facts to the methodologies of leading cases that have looked to history to analyze the constitutionality of gun control laws. Because ten rounds is an oft-proposed figure for magazine bans, Part II of the article provides the story of such magazines from the sixteenth century onward. Although some people think that multi- shot guns did not appear until Samuel Colt invented the revolver in the 1830s, multi-shot guns predate Colonel Colt by over two centuries.1 Especially because the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller2 considers whether arms are “in common use” and are “typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,”3 the article also pays attention to whether and when particular guns and their magazines achieved mass-market success in the United States. The first time a rifle with more than ten rounds of ammunition did so was in 1866,4 and the first time a * Adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law, Denver University, Sturm College of Law. Research Director, Independence Institute, Denver, Colorado. Associate Policy Analyst, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C. Professor Kopel is the author of fifteen books and over ninety scholarly journal articles, including the first law school textbook on the Second Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses
    PROTECTIVE FORCE FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Health, Safety and Security AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.hss.energy.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses July 2011 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A – APPROVED FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES .......................... I-1 CHAPTER I . INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... I-1 1. Scope .................................................................................................................. I-1 2. Content ............................................................................................................... I-1 CHAPTER II . DOE FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ................................................................................ II-1 1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................II-1 2. Scope .................................................................................................................II-1 3. Process ..............................................................................................................II-1 4. Roles .................................................................................................................II-2 CHAPTER III . GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES.............................................................................III-1 CHAPTER IV
    [Show full text]