DOCSLIB.ORG

Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Baccaro, Lucio; Howell, Chris Working Paper Unhinged: Industrial relations liberalization and capitalist instability MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 17/19 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Baccaro, Lucio; Howell, Chris (2017) : Unhinged: Industrial relations liberalization and capitalist instability, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 17/19, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-5B75-A This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/172298 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/19 Unhinged Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability Lucio Baccaro and Chris Howell MPIfG Discussion Paper MPIfG Discussion Paper Lucio Baccaro, Chris Howell Unhinged: Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/19 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne November 2017 MPIfG Discussion Paper ISSN 0944-2073 (Print) ISSN 1864-4325 (Internet) © 2017 by the author(s) About the authors Lucio Baccaro is Director at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies and Professor of Macro Sociology at the University of Geneva. Email: [email protected] Chris Howell is the James Monroe Professor of Politics at Oberlin College. Email: [email protected] MPIfG Discussion Papers are refereed scholarly papers of the kind that are publishable in a peer-reviewed disciplinary journal. Their objective is to contribute to the cumulative improvement of theoretical knowl- edge. The papers can be ordered from the institute for a small fee (hard copies) or downloaded free of charge (PDF). Downloads www.mpifg.de Go to Publications / Discussion Papers Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Paulstr. 3 | 50676 Cologne | Germany Tel. +49 221 2767-0 Fax +49 221 2767-555 www.mpifg.de [email protected] Baccaro, Howell: Unhinged: Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability iii Abstract This paper makes two interrelated arguments. First, based on case studies of Sweden and Germany, it argues for a generalized liberalization trend in industrial relations, affecting not just “liberal” but also “coordinated” forms of capitalism. In coordinated economies, lib- eralization has not taken place primarily through outright deregulation, but has involved alternative mechanisms that increase employer discretion without fundamentally altering the form of existing institutions. Second, the paper links the liberalization of industrial relations to “secular stagnation” – i.e., to the growing difficulty that all advanced econo- mies have in generating adequate levels of aggregate demand. It argues that strong unions and centralized collective bargaining were cornerstones of the wage-led Fordist model, and that the liberalization of industrial relations has undermined a crucial institutional channel for transmitting productivity increases into real wages and aggregate demand. Post-Fordist growth models are based on alternative drivers of growth, but they are all fundamentally unstable. Keywords: capitalism, liberalization, industrial relations, secular stagnation, Europe Zusammenfassung Dieses Diskussionspapier führt zwei Argumente. Erstens zeigt es auf der Basis von Fallstudien zu Schweden und Deutschland, dass sich der gegenwärtige Trend der Liberalisierung der Arbeitsbeziehungen nicht nur auf die „liberale“ Ländergruppe, sondern auch auf die „koor- dinierten“ Kapitalismusmodelle erstreckt. In den koordinierten Ökonomien geschah dies nicht allein mittels durchgreifender Liberalisierungspolitik, sondern auch mittels alternati- ver Mechanismen, die die Institutionen intakt ließen, den diskretionären Handlungsspiel- raum der Arbeitgeber aber gleichwohl erhöhten. Zweitens verknüpft das Papier den Befund der Liberalisierung der Arbeitsbeziehungen mit der Debatte über „säkulare Stagnation“, also der Schwierigkeit entwickelter Industrieländer, ihre gesamtwirtschaftliche Nachfrage adäquat zu entwickeln: Die Liberalisierung der Arbeitsbeziehungen hat die Gewerkschaften geschwächt, die Lohnfindung dezentralisiert und der Überführung von Produktivitätsfort- schritten in Reallohn- und Nachfragezuwächse damit die institutionelle Grundlage entzo- gen. Die postfordistischen Wachstumsmodelle, die sich auf alternative Wachstumstreiber stützen, erweisen sich allesamt als instabil. Schlagwörter: Kapitalismus, Liberalisierung, industrielle Beziehungen, säkulare Stagnation, Europa iv MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/19 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The liberalization of industrial relations 2 The Swedish case 4 The German case 8 3 The key role of industrial relations institutions in wage-led Fordist growth 12 4 Industrial relations liberalization and the crisis of wage-led growth 16 5 Concluding remarks 20 References 22 Baccaro, Howell: Unhinged: Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability 1 Unhinged: Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability 1 Introduction This paper discusses the impact of industrial relations liberalization on the instability of current capitalist growth models. It makes two interrelated arguments. First, by ana- lyzing two “unlikely” cases for liberalization, Germany and Sweden, we document the existence of a generalized liberalization trend, not just in “liberal” forms of capitalism (which is uncontroversial) but also in “coordinated” forms (Baccaro and Howell 2011; Baccaro and Howell 2017), where it mostly took the form of reformatting existing insti- tutions to make them serve different goals and produce different outcomes. Second, we establish a link between the liberalization of industrial relations and “secular stagnation” (Summers 2014), a trend by which capitalism becomes progressively unable to generate levels of aggregate demand sufficient to stimulate investment and produce full employ- ment (Storm 2017). Briefly stated, we see the liberalization of industrial relations as part and parcel of the withering away of the regulation and growth regime of “wage-led Fordism” and secular stagnation as deriving from the inability to find a replacement for the stabilizing function once exercised by Fordist industrial relations institutions. National industrial relations systems characterized by strong trade unions and indus- try-level collective bargaining played a key role, we argue, in wage-led Fordism. Specifi- cally, they provided crucial institutional mechanisms ensuring the transfer of produc- tivity gains into real wages and household consumption. This was a key institutional innovation relative to the previous regulatory model of the interwar years, as it allowed aggregate demand to expand in lockstep with the expansion of the productive potential of the economy for some time. The wage-led Fordist model began to come apart at the seams sometime in the 1970s due to a combination of international economic shifts (in primis trade and capital ac- count liberalization) and internal tensions (wage inflation and deindustrialization). The crisis of industrial relations was linked to the demise of wage-led Fordism as both cause and consequence. On the one hand, the inability of wage-led growth to adapt to trade and financial liberalization, and its endemic problem of inflation, facilitated a shift in the balance of class power which permitted the liberalization of industrial rela- tions institutions through changes in state policy, a decline in labor’s capacity to resist, and capital’s greater ability to push for its first-order preference, which was using as much discretion as possible. On the other hand, the liberalization of industrial relations contributed to undermining Fordist growth further but also created the conditions for the emergence of a new set of post-Fordist growth models, different from one another, but sharing a set of key features: industrial relations are no longer the key institution in 2 MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/19 the regulatory architecture of capitalisms; labor markets are much closer to being com- petitively regulated than ever before in the postwar period; and the resulting growth models are all imbalanced and prone to crisis. The remainder of the paper is divided into two parts. First, we discuss the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Labour Standards and Economic Integration
    Chapter 4 LABOUR STANDARDS AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION A, INTRODUCTION AND MAIN FINDINGS the establishment of a “social clause” in the GATT. Then there is thc vicw that labour standards are a poten- tial determinant of economic efficiency [Sengenberger Over the last decade, the process of creating and (1991); Castro et al. (‘I 992j1, Without international stand- enlarging regional trading areas (RTAs j has gathered ards, firms will compete by offering poor working condi- momentum. The EC Single Market, European Free Trade tions. The imposition of a floor to wages and employ- Agreement (EFTA) and North America Free Trade ment protection legislation, it is argued, will create a Agreement (NAFTA) are important examples of RTAs in stable labour relations framework conducive to improved the OECD area. The membership of these RTAs includes human capital and higher real incomes, and thereby boost countries with different levels of economic development world trade. Thus, the establishment of certain labour and with different labour standards. The issue arises as to standards would be justified un long-term efficiency whether some degree of harmonization of labour stand- grounds. A third group argues that, on the contrary, ards is called for, so as to prevent trade liberalisation exogenously imposed labour standards may produce det- stemming from economic integration from eroding work- iimental output and trade effects [Fields (1990)l. Accord- ing conditions, Governments and firms may indeed be ing to this vicw, working conditions should improve tcinptcd to put pressure on working conditions and social hand in hand with economic development and so policy- protection in an effort to improve competitiveness in makers should focus on outcomes rather than on the world markets, generating what has been called “social regulations and institutional arrangements governing dumping”.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSIONAL, TECHNICAL, CLERICAL, MECHANICAL and SIMILAR OCCUPATIONS Effective January 1, 2002 As Amended
    OFFICIAL NOTICE INDUSTRIAL WELFARE COMMISSION ORDER NO. 4-2001 REGULATING WAGES, HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE PROFESSIONAL, TECHNICAL, CLERICAL, MECHANICAL AND SIMILAR OCCUPATIONS Effective January 1, 2002 as amended Sections 4(A) and 10(C) amended and republished by the Department of Industrial Relations, effective January 1, 2019, pursuant to SB 13, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2016 and section 1182.13 of the Labor Code This Order Must Be Posted Where Employees Can Read It Easily IWC FORM 1104 (Rev. 11/2018) OSP 06 98762 • Please Post With This Side Showing • OFFICIAL NOTICE Effective January 1, 2001 as amended Sections 4(A) and 10(C) amended and republished by the Department of Industrial Relations, effective January 1, 2019, pursuant to SB 3, Chapter 4, Statutes of 2016 and section 1182.13 of the Labor Code INDUSTRIAL WELFARE COMMISSION ORDER NO. 4-2001 REGULATING WAGES, HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE PROFESSIONAL,TECHNICAL, CLERICAL, MECHANICAL AND SIMILAR OCCUPATIONS TAKE NOTICE: To employers and representatives of persons working in industries and occupations in the State of California: The Department of Industrial Relations amends and republishes the minimum wage and meals and lodging credits in the Industrial Welfare Commission’s Orders as a result of legislation enacted (SB 3, Ch. 4, Stats of 2016, amending section 1182.12 of the California Labor Code), and pursuant to section 1182.13 of the California Labor Code. The amendments and republishing make no other changes to the IWC’s Orders. 1. APPLICABILITY OF ORDER This order shall apply to all persons employed in professional, technical, clerical, mechanical, and similar occupations whether paid on a time, piece rate, commission, or other basis, except that: (A) Provisions of Sections 3 through 12 shall not apply to persons employed in administrative, executive, or professional capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report – Severe Labour Exploitation – Ireland
    Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET) Severe forms of Labour Exploitation Supporting victims of severe forms of labour exploitation in having access to justice in EU Member States Ireland, 2014 FRANET contractor: Milieu, Belgium Author: Robert Mooney, UCD, RTI Applied Research Centre (ARC) University College Dublin DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Severe forms of labour exploitation’ . The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. 1 Contents Table of figures ................................................................................................................ 4 Categories of interviewees: ............................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Interviews ........................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Focus Group ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Employment Relationship and the Field of Industrial Relations
    THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP 1 1 THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP AND THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PAUL EDWARDS The term ‘industrial relations’ (IR) came into common use in Britain and North America during the 1920s. It has been joined by personnel management (PM) and, since the 1980s, human resource management (HRM). All three denote a practical activity (the management of people) and an area of academic enquiry. Texts in all three fields commonly take as their starting point the corporate assertion that ‘people are our most important asset’: if this is indeed so, there is little further need to justify a text. Yet we need first to explain what lies behind this apparent axiom. It is then important to highlight some of the key current issues about the conduct of work in modern Britain. We can then consider how IR as an academic approach addresses these issues and the distinction between it and the other two fields of enquiry. Finally, the structure of the book is explained. First, some basic explanation. ‘Industry’ is sometimes equated with manufac- turing, as in contrasts between industry and services. ‘Industrial relations’ has in principle never been so restricted. In practice, however, attention until recently often focused on certain parts of the economy. These in fact embraced more than manufacturing to include the public sector for example, but there was neglect of small firms and large parts of the private service sector. Whether or not there were good reasons for this neglect (and the case is at least arguable), the situation has changed, and recent research has addressed growing areas of the economy such as call centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Relations
    Industrial relations Introduction Sound industrial relations and effective social dialogue are a means to promote better wages and working conditions as well as peace and social justice. As instruments of good governance they foster cooperation and economic performance, helping to create an enabling environment for the realization of the objective of Decent Work at the national level. Indicators on industrial relations are an important element in measuring progress of Decent Work, which is why ILOSTAT presents statistics on trade union density and collective bargaining coverage rates resulting from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. ILOSTAT also includes statistics compiled from national sources on the number of strikes and lockouts that took place every year, the number of workers involved in strikes and lockouts, the number of days not worked due to strikes and lockouts and the ratio of days not worked due to strikes and lockouts per 1000 workers, all of them disaggregated by economic activity. Concepts and definitions A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. For the purposes of favouring international comparability of the statistics presented in ILOSTAT, trade union membership refers only to union members who are employees. That is, it excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. Workers covered by collective bargaining are all those workers whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Exploitation: Emerging Empirical Evidence
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Dickens, Linda (Ed.); Meardi, Guglielmo (Ed.) Working Paper Labour market exploitation: Emerging empirical evidence Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 108 Provided in Cooperation with: Industrial Relations Research Unit, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick Suggested Citation: Dickens, Linda (Ed.); Meardi, Guglielmo (Ed.) (2017) : Labour market exploitation: Emerging empirical evidence, Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 108, University of Warwick, Industrial Relations Research Unit, Coventry This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/197741 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN SYSTEM of INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Some Contrasts with Foreign Systems
    CHAPTER VIII THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Some Contrasts With Foreign Systems SUMNER H. SLICHTER Lamont Professor of Economics Harvard University The year 1954 saw important developments in the field of indus- trial jurisprudence. A New York arbitrator held that it is not per- missible to fire a waiter because he is writing a book about the customers and the owner of the restaurant. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that a bartender, hit by flying beer steins, may collect workmen's compensation. An Australian tribunal held that compen- sation was proper in the case of a dislocated jaw suffered while yawning at work. There were also important new laws and adminis- trative orders. Boxers appearing in professional bouts in Indiana were required to take non-communist oaths. The town of Waterloo, Nebraska, forbade barbers to eat onions between 7 A.M. and 7. P.M. Before a body such as this it might seem appropriate for me to discuss these and other important recent developments in industrial jurisprudence. But your President knows that I am not competent to do this and he wisely suggested that I refrain from talking about the kind of problems that you are so expert at handling. Something broad and general that might give you what he called "background" and that would not too painfully reveal my ignorance of arbitration was what he suggested. Well, the broadest topic that I can think of in the labor field is comparisons between the systems of industrial relations of different countries. Consequently, I am going to discuss a few aspects of the 167 168 ARBITRATION TODAY American system of industrial relations and contrast them with cor- responding parts of some foreign systems of industrial relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Will the New Industrial Relations Last? : Implications for the American Labor
    n* WORKING PAPER ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan Michael J. Piore December 1983 SSM WP //1505-83 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139 Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan Michael J. Piore December 1983 SSM WP //1505-83 Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan and Michael J. Piore Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 1983 This paper was prepared for a forthcoming issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science devoted to the future of the labor movement. Portions of this paper were presented at an MIT/Union Leadership Conference held in Boston in June, 1983. The content of the paper draws on some of the findings emerging out of a collaborative research project studying "U.S. Industrial Relations in Transition" underway in the Industrial Relations Section at MIT. Funds for this project are provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, however, the authors are solely responsible for the contents of this paper. Abstract This paper reviews changes occurring in the U.S. industrial relations system at the workplace, in collective bargaining, and at the level of strategic decision making within business and labor organizations. By relating these current developments to longer term pressures on the post New Deal industrial relations system, we suggest that the system is undergoing fundamental transformation. To adapt to these changes unions will need to redefine their roles at the workplace by reorganizing work and fostering worker participation, adjust their wage bargaining objectives to promote employment continuity and compensation systems that are more closely tied to firm performance, and play a more direct and central role in business strategy decisions within the firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Participation and Productivity Change
    Worker participation and productivity change A careful assessment of the available evidence casts doubt on the viability of grafting industrial relations practices from abroad onto the U.S. scene SAR A. LEVITAN AND DIANE WERNEKE In the past several years, there has been increasing specu- patibly designed, given the existing skills of employees, or lation that the decisionmaking patterns of foreign business they may be inappropriately meshed. Information may be firms hold the key to improving U.S . productivity perfor- lacking, thereby forestalling smooth and coordinated work mance, reflecting greater recognition of institutional and processes. The consequence is deficient control over the cultural influences on productivity . In particular, the in- quality and quantity of production . Management can set its dustrial practices found in West Germany and Japan, the goals in broad terms, but at the lower levels there is con- United States' strongest competitors, have been cited as siderable room for variation both in the interpretation of models to be emulated to achieve optimal productivity . goals and in the effort made to meet them. To achieve greater Pointing to the traditional relationship between U.S. man- productivity, according to this view, management needs to agement and labor as well as the failure of many business share authority with workers by giving the employees a leaders to properly manage and motivate their employees, greater voice in determining production processes . proponents of reforming the workplace have stressed the Job satisfaction may also play a major role in worker potential of raising productivity through better labor- productivity . One of the principal arguments advanced in management communications and the establishment of pro- favor of worker participation is that giving employees a grams of greater worker participation.' greater share in decisionmaking can reduce alienation and, Rejecting the prevailing U .S .
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Unions Do in Times of Economic Crisis? Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe
    IZA DP No. 9466 What Do Unions Do in Times of Economic Crisis? Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe Artjoms Ivlevs Michail Veliziotis October 2015 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor What Do Unions Do in Times of Economic Crisis? Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe Artjoms Ivlevs University of the West of England, GEP, DEFI, CETS and IZA Michail Veliziotis University of the West of England Discussion Paper No. 9466 October 2015 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Profitability Or Industrial Relations: What Explains Manufacturing Performance Across Indian States?1
    Profitability or Industrial Relations: What Explains Manufacturing 1 Performance Across Indian States? Anirban Karak± and Deepankar Basu# This version: March 15, 2017 Abstract We use a state-level panel data set for the period 1969-2005 to analyze the relative importance of profitability (rate of profit) and industrial disputes (man-days lost to all industrial disputes per worker) in explaining cross-state variations of manufacturing sector performance in India. Using three different measures of manufacturing performance – net value added, investment and employment – we find that profitability is more significant than industrial disputes in explaining the variation of manufacturing sector performance across Indian states. Keywords: manufacturing performance, profitability, industrial disputes JEL Classification: B50, C26, O10 1 Acknowledgement: The research for this paper was supported by a Chair’s Summer Research Fellowship, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ± Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Email: [email protected] # Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Email: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction Economists have often envisaged an important role for the manufacturing sector in the structural transformation of an underdeveloped economy. While Lewis (1954) focused on the ability of manufacturing to absorb surplus labor from the traditional sector, Kaldor (1967) claimed that a fast growth rate of national income can only be achieved if a dynamic, fast-growing manufacturing sector leads the way.2However, the actual experience of the Indian economy is quite different. Immediately after attaining independence in 1947, political leaders in India placed a great deal of emphasis on planned import-substitution industrialization (ISI) as the motor for economic development of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Does It Have a Future in Post-Industrial Society”
    “Whither Industrial Relations: Does It Have a Future in Post-Industrial Society” Michael J. Piore David W. Skinner Professor of Political Economy Department of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Prepared for Presentation at: British Journal of Industrial Relations Annual Lecture 2010 London, United Kingdom November 18, 2010 This Version: July 25, 2011 Industrial relations is in trouble. It is in trouble both as a set of institutions and practices linked to trade unions and collective bargaining (however broadly defined) and as a scholarly endeavor. The problem is that these institutions are under attack. The attack has been especially virulent in the U.S., and particularly successful. There, trade union membership and collective bargaining coverage has fallen from a third of the private sector labor force in the early postwar decades to less than 8% today. For this reason, I want to focus on the U.S. here. But the attack is not confined to the United States: Union power has declined to a greater or less extent in most of the industrial world. The attack is, to be sure, both in the U.S. and elsewhere, part of an effort of particular economic and social interests to gain private advantage; and it has succeeded through the exercise of raw political and economic power. But the attack is also intellectual, and takes advantage of a weakness of industrial relations as a scholarly discipline. In the past, the discipline has provided an intellectual defence of trade unions and a framework in terms of which society, and indeed the unions themselves, could understand and justify their existence and deal with the problems that they posed for social organization.
    [Show full text]